References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 June 2017
Summary
A summary is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Debating HumanityTowards a Philosophical Sociology, pp. 237 - 254Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
- Creative Commons
This content is Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence CC-BY-NC 3.0 https://creativecommons.org/cclicenses/
References
Abbas, A. and McLean, M. (2003) ‘Communicative competence and the improvement of university teaching: Insights from the field’, British Journal of Sociology of Education 24 (1): 69–82.Google Scholar
Alexander, J. C. (1983) Theoretical logic in sociology volume 4. The modern reconstruction of classical thought: Talcott Parsons, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Alexander, J. C., Giesen, B., Münch, R. and Smelser, J. (eds.) (1987) The micro–macro link, Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Althusser, L. (2003) ‘The humanist controversy’, in Althusser, L. The humanist controversy and other writings, London: Verso.Google Scholar
Alvear, R. (forthcoming) Die Stellung des Menschen in der zeitgenössischen Soziologie. Umrisse zu einer Soziologischen Anthropologie, Ph.D. thesis Flensburg University.Google Scholar
Archer, M. S. (1988) Culture and agency: The place of culture in social theory, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Archer, M. S. (1991) ‘Presidential address. Sociology for one world: Unity and diversity’, International Sociology 6 (2): 131–47.Google Scholar
Archer, M. S. (1995) Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Archer, M. S. (2003) Structure, agency and the internal conversation, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Archer, M. S. (2007) Making our way through the world: Human reflexivity and social mobility, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Archer, M. S. (2009) ‘El eurocentrismo no muere fácilmente: La sociología más allá del centro y la periferia’, in Archer, M. S. Teoría social realista. El enfoque morfogenético, Santiago: Ediciones Universidad Alberto Hurtado.Google Scholar
Archer, M. S. (2012) The reflexive imperative in late modernity, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Archer, M. S., Bhaskar, R., Collier, A., Lawson, T. and Norrie, A. (eds.) (1998) Critical realism: Essential readings, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Archer, M. S. and Tritter, J. (eds.) (2000) Rational choice theory: Resisting colonization, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Arendt, H. (1953) ‘The origins of totalitarianism – A reply’, Review of Politics 15 (1): 76–84.Google Scholar
Arendt, H. (1992) Lectures on Kant’s political philosophy, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Atwell, J. (1986) ‘Sartre and action theory’, in Silverman, H. and Elliston, F. (eds.), Jean-Paul Sartre: Contemporary approaches to his philosophy, Brighton: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Baehr, P. (2002) ‘Identifying the unprecedented: Hannah Arendt, totalitarianism, and the critique of sociology’, American Sociological Review 67 (6): 804–31.Google Scholar
Baehr, P. (2010) Hannah Arendt, totalitarianism and the social sciences, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Baehr, P. (2012) ‘Debating totalitarianism: An exchange of letters between Hannah Arendt and Eric Voegelin’, History and Theory 51 (3): 364–80.Google Scholar
Baert, P. (2015) The existentialist moment: The rise of Sartre as a public intellectual, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Barash, J. A. (1998) ‘The sense of history: On the political implications of Karl Löwith’s concept of secularization’, History & Theory 37 (1): 69–75.Google Scholar
Barber, B. and Gerhardt, U. (eds.) (1999) Agenda for sociology: Classic sources and current uses of Talcott Parsons’s work, Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
Basaure, M. (2011) ‘In the epicenter of politics: Axel Honneth’s theory of the struggles for recognition and Luc Boltanski and Laurent Thévenot’s moral and political sociology’, European Journal of Social Theory 14 (3): 263–81.Google Scholar
Baum, R. (1977) ‘Introduction to part IV. Generalized media in action’, in Loubser, J., Baum, R., Effrat, A. and Lidz, V. (eds.), Explorations in the general theory in social science: Essays in honour of Talcott Parsons, vol. II, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Beaufret, J. (1973a) Dialogue avec Heidegger. Volume 1: Philosophie grecque, Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
Beaufret, J. (1973b) Dialogue avec Heidegger. Volume 2: Philosophie moderne, Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
Beaufret, J. (1974) Dialogue avec Heidegger. Volume 3: Approche de Heidegger, Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
Beaufret, J. (1985) Dialogue avec Heidegger. Volume 4: Le chemin de Heidegger, Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
Beemer, J. (2006) ‘Breaching the theoretical divide: Reassessing the ordinary and everyday in Habermas and Garfinkel’, Sociological Theory 24 (1): 81–104.Google Scholar
Bendix, R. (1970) Embattled reason. Essays on social knowledge, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Benhabib, S. (2004) ‘Reclaiming universalism: Negotiating republican self-determination and cosmopolitan norms’, The Tanner lectures on human values, www.tannerlectures.utah.edu/lectures/volume25/benhabib_2005.pdf (last accessed 20 August 2007).Google Scholar
Benton, T. (1977) Philosophical foundations of the three sociologies, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Bissell, O., Traulsen, J. M. and Haugbolle, L. S. (2002) ‘An introduction to functionalist sociology: Talcott Parsons’ concept of the “sick role”’, International Journal of Pharmacy Practice 10 (1): 60–8.Google Scholar
Blumenberg, H. J. (2015) The laughter of the Thracian woman: A protohistory of theory, London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Boden, M. A. (2005) ‘Escaping from the Chinese room’, in Boden, M. A. (ed.), The philosophy of artificial intelligence, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boltanski, L. (2013) The foetal condition. A sociology of engendering and abortion, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Boltanski, L. and Thévenot, L. (1999) ‘The sociology of critical capacity’, European Journal of Social Theory 2 (3): 359–77.Google Scholar
Boltanski, L. and Thévenot, L. (2006) On justification: Economies of worth, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Borradori, G. (ed.) (2003) Philosophy in a time of terror: Dialogues with Jürgen Habermas and Jacques Derrida, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Borsari, A. (2009) ‘Notes on “philosophical anthropology” in Germany”. An introduction’, Iris. European Journal of Philosophy and Public Debate 1 (1): 113–29.Google Scholar
Browne, C. (2014a) ‘“Experience is a mixture of violence and justification”: Luc Boltanski in conversation with Craig Browne’, Thesis Eleven 124 (1): 7–19.Google Scholar
Browne, C. (2014b) ‘The institution of critique and the critique of institutions’, Thesis Eleven 124 (1): 20–52.Google Scholar
Brunkhorst, H. (2014) ‘Revolutionary constitutions: Arendt’s inversions of Heidegger’, European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology 1 (3): 283–98.Google Scholar
Burkle, H. (1971) ‘Sartre’s “ideal” of social unity’, in Warnock, M. (ed.), Sartre, New York: Anchor.Google Scholar
Burnham, J. C. (2014) ‘Why sociologists abandoned the sick role concept’, History of the Human Sciences 27 (1): 70–87.Google Scholar
Buxton, W. (1985) Talcott Parsons and the capitalist nation-state, University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Caetano, A. (2015) ‘Defining personal reflexivity: A critical reading of Archer’s approach’, European Journal of Social Theory 18 (1): 60–75.Google Scholar
Calarco, M. (2008) Zoographies: The question of the animal from Heidegger to Derrida, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Camic, C. (1991) ‘Introduction: Talcott Parsons before The structure of social action’, in Camic, C. (ed.), Talcott Parsons: The early essays, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Caputo, J. (1992) ‘Heidegger’s scandal: Thinking and the essence of the victim’, in Rockmore, T. and Margolis, J. (eds.), The Heidegger case: On philosophy and politics, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Cassirer, E. (1972) The philosophy of symbolic forms. Volume 3. The phenomenology of knowledge, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Cassirer, E. (1996) The philosophy of symbolic forms. Volume 4. The metaphysics of symbolic forms, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Celikates, R. (2006) ‘From critical social theory to a social theory of critique: On the critique of ideology after the pragmatic turn’, Constellations 13 (1): 21–40.Google Scholar
Chernilo, D. (2002) ‘The theorisation of social co-ordinations in differentiated societies. The theory of generalised symbolic media in Parsons, Luhmann and Habermas’, British Journal of Sociology 53 (3): 431–49.Google Scholar
Chernilo, D. (2007a) A social theory of the nation-state: The political forms of modernity beyond methodological nationalism, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chernilo, D. (2007b) ‘Universalismo y cosmopolitismo en la teoría de Jürgen Habermas’, Estudios Públicos 106: 175–203.Google Scholar
Chernilo, D. (2009) ‘Talcott Parsons’ sociology of the nation-state’, in Hart, C. (ed.), Collection of essays in honour of Talcott Parsons, Cheshire: Midrash.Google Scholar
Chernilo, D. (2012a) ‘Cosmopolitanism and the question of universalism’, in Delanty, G. (ed.), The Routledge handbook of cosmopolitan studies, Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chernilo, D. (2012b) ‘Cosmopolitanism in social theory: An ambivalent defence’, in Krossa, A. and Robertson, R. (eds.), European cosmopolitanism in question, Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Chernilo, D. (2012c) ‘Social and system integration: The philosophical foundations of a key distinction in (British) social theory’, www.academia.edu/2654231/Social_and_System_Integration_The_Philosophical_Foundations_of_a_Key_Distinction_in_British_Social_Theory (last accessed August 2016).Google Scholar
Chernilo, D. (2012d) ‘Historia de la sociología y teoría sistemática en Niklas Luhmann’, in Cadenas, H., Mascareño, A., and Urquiza, A. (eds.), Niklas Luhmann y el legado universalista de su teoría. Aportes para el análisis de la complejidad social contemporánea, Santiago: RIL.Google Scholar
Chernilo, D. (2013a) The natural law foundations of modern social theory: A quest for universalism, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chernilo, D. (2013b) ‘Jürgen Habermas: Modern social theory as postmetaphysical natural law’, Journal of Classical Sociology 13 (2): 254–73.Google Scholar
Chernilo, D. (2014) ‘The idea of philosophical sociology’, British Journal of Sociology 65 (2): 338–57.Google Scholar
Chernilo, D. (2017) ‘the question of the human in the Anthropocene debate’, European Journal of Social Theory 20 (1): 44–60.Google Scholar
Clark, A. (2001) Mindware: An introduction to the philosophy of cognitive science, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, A. (2003) Natural born cyborgs: Minds, technologies and the future of human intelligence, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, A. (2008) Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action and cognitive extension, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, A. and Chalmers, D. (2008) ‘The extended mind’, in Clark, A. Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action and cognitive extension, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, D. (2007) ‘On being “the last Kantian in Nazi Germany”: Dwelling with animals after Levinas’, in Ham, J. and Senior, M. (eds.), Animal Acts, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. and Arato, A. (1992) Civil society and political theory, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, R. A. (2006) ‘Introduction: Humanism and anti-humanism – Levinas, Cassirer, and Heidegger’, in Levinas, E. Humanism of the other, Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Connolly, W. (2004) ‘Catholicism and philosophy: A nontheistic appreciation’, in Abbey, R. (ed.), Charles Taylor, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cooke, M. (1993) ‘Habermas and consensus’, European Journal of Philosophy 1 (3): 247–67.Google Scholar
Cordero, R. (2014a) ‘It happens in-between: On the spatial birth of politics in Arendt’s On revolution’, European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology 1 (3): 249–65.Google Scholar
Cordero, R. (2014b) ‘Crisis and critique in Jürgen Habermas’s social theory’, European Journal of Social Theory 17(4): 497–515.Google Scholar
Craib, I. (1976) Existentialism and sociology. A study of Jean-Paul Sartre, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cumming, R. D. (1988) ‘This place of violence, obscurity and witchcraft’, in Wilcocks, R. (ed.), Critical essays on Jean-Paul Sartre, Boston: G. K. Hall.Google Scholar
Dahrendorf, R. (1958) ‘Out of utopia: Towards a reorientation of sociological analysis’, American Journal of Sociology 64 (2): 115–27.Google Scholar
Dahrendorf, R. (1962) ‘Sociology and human nature’, in Essays in the theory of society, Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
de Mul, J. (ed.) (2014) Plessner’s philosophical anthropology: Perspectives and prospects, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. (1995) What is philosophy?, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Depeltau, F. (2008) ‘Relational thinking: A critique of co-deterministic theories of structure and agency’, Sociological Theory 26 (1): 51–73.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (1982) ‘The ends of man’, in Derrida, J. Margins of philosophy, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (1991a) ‘Philosopher’s hell: An interview’, in Wolin, R. (ed.), The Heidegger controversy: A critical reader, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (1991b) Of spirit: Heidegger and the question, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (2002) ‘Structure, sign and play in the discourse of the human sciences’, in Derrida, J. Writing and difference, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Diken, B. (2015) ‘Critique as justification – and beyond’, Sociological Review 63 (4): 922–39.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, H. L. (2004) ‘Taylor’s (anti-)epistemology’, in Abbey, R. (ed.), Charles Taylor, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, H. L. and Dreyfus, S. E. (2005) ‘Making mind versus modelling the brain: Artificial intelligence back at a branch-point’, in Boden, M. A. (ed.), The philosophy of artificial intelligence, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E. (1960) ‘The dualism of human nature and its social conditions’, in Wolf, K. (ed.), Essays on sociology and philosophy, New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E. (1970) Montesquieu and Rousseau. Forerunners of sociology, Michigan: Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E. (1992) Professional ethics and civic morals, London and New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Durkin, K. (2014) The radical humanism of Erich Fromm, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Dux, G. (1991) ‘Communicative reason and interest: On the reconstruction of the normative order in societies structured by egalitarianism or domination’, in Honneth, A. and Joas, H. (eds.), Essays on Jürgen Habermas’s theory of communicative action, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Elder-Vass, D. (2007) ‘Reconciling Archer and Bourdieu in an emergentist theory of action’, Sociological Theory 25 (4): 325–46.Google Scholar
Elder-Vass, D. (2010) The causal powers of social structures: Emergence, structure and agency, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elkarïn-Sartre, A. (2007) ‘Preface to the 1996 French edition’, in Sartre, M. Existentialism is a humanism, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1968) ‘Humanism and the future’, in Ayer, A. J. (ed.), The humanist outlook, London: Pemberton.Google Scholar
Faye, E. (2009) Heidegger. The introduction of Nazism into philosophy, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Feher, F. (1991a) ‘Weber and the rationalization of music’, in Heller, A. and Feher, F. The grandeur and twilight of radical universalism, New Jersey: Transaction.Google Scholar
Feher, F. (1991b) ‘Between relativism and fundamentalism: Hermeneutics as Europe’s mainstream political and moral tradition’, in Heller, A. and Feher, F. The grandeur and twilight of radical universalism, New Jersey: Transaction.Google Scholar
Ferrara, A. (1987) ‘A critique of Habermas’s consensus theory of truth’, Philosophy and Social Criticism 13 (1): 39–67.Google Scholar
Fine, R. (2008) ‘Judgment and the reification of the faculties. A reconstructive reading of Arendt’s Life of the mind’, Philosophy and Social Criticism 34 (1–2): 157–76.Google Scholar
Fine, R. (2014) ‘Re-reading Arendt’s On revolution: On the dialectics of the modern revolutionary tradition’, European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology 1 (3): 219–33.Google Scholar
Finkielkraut, A. (2001) In the name of humanity: Reflections on the twentieth century, London: Pimlico.Google Scholar
Fischer, J. (2009) ‘Exploring the core identity of philosophical anthropology through the works of Max Scheler, Helmuth Plessner and Arnold Gehlen’, Iris. European Journal of Philosophy and Public Debate 1 (1): 153–70.Google Scholar
Flynn, T. R. (1988) ‘L’imagination au pouvoir: The evolution of Sartre’s political and social thought’, in Wilcocks, R. (ed.), Boston: G. K. Hall.Google Scholar
Fowler, B. (2015) ‘Figures of descent from classical sociological theory: Luc Boltanski’, in Susen, S. and Turner, B. (eds.), The spirit of Luc Boltanski, London: Anthem.Google Scholar
Frank, A. (2013) ‘From sick role to practices of health and illness’, Medical Education 47: 18–25.Google Scholar
Fuller, S. (2011) Humanity 2.0: What it means to be human past, present and future, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Fuller, S. and Lipinska, V. (2014) The proactionary imperative. A foundation for transhumanism, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Gadamer, H.-G. (1992) ‘The political incompetence of philosophy’, in Rockmore, T. and Margolis, J. (eds.), The Heidegger case: On philosophy and politics, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Gangas, S. (2014) ‘From alienation to capability deprivation: Reconstructing a sociological concept’, Social Science Information 53 (1): 54–75.Google Scholar
Gangas, S. (2016) ‘From agency to capabilities: Sen and sociological theory’, Current Sociology 64 (1): 22–40.Google Scholar
Gebauer, G. and Wulf, C. (2009) ‘After the “death of man”: From philosophical anthropology to historical anthropology’, Iris. European Journal of Philosophy and Public Debate 1 (1): 171–86.Google Scholar
Gehlen, A. (1988) Man: His nature and his place in the world, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Gerhardt, U. (1989) Ideas about illness: An intellectual and political history of medical sociology, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Gerhardt, U. (ed.) (1993) Talcott Parsons on National Socialism, New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Gerhardt, U. (1999) ‘National Socialism and the politics of The structure of social action’, in Barber, B. and Gerhardt, U. (eds.), Agenda for sociology: Classic sources and current uses of Talcott Parsons’s work, Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
Gerhardt, U. (2002) Talcott Parsons. An intellectual biography, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, P. (2012) Continental divide. Heidegger, Cassirer, Davos, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gouldner, A. W. (1965) Enter Plato. Classical Greece and the origins of social theory, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Grassi, E. (1983) Heidegger and the question of Renaissance humanism, State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Grassi, E. (1988) ‘The rehabilitation of rhetorical humanism regarding Heidegger’s anti-humanism’, Diogenes 36 (142) 136–56.Google Scholar
Gronow, A. (2008) ‘The over- or the undersocialized conception of man? Practice theory and the problem of intersubjectivity’, Sociology 42 (2): 243–59.Google Scholar
Guggenheim, M. and Potthast, J. (2012) ‘Symmetrical twins: On the relationship between actor–network theory and the sociology of critical capacities’, European Journal of Social Theory 15 (2): 157–78.Google Scholar
Haar, M. (1980) ‘Sartre and Heidegger’, in Silverman, H. and Elliston, F. (eds.), Jean-Paul Sartre: Contemporary approaches to his philosophy, Brighton: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1971) ‘Science and technology as ideology’, in Habermas, J. Towards a rational society, Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1976) ‘Some distinctions in universal pragmatics. A working paper’, Theory and Society 3(2): 155–67.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1979) ‘What is universal pragmatics?’, in Habermas, J. Communication and the evolution of society, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1984a) The theory of communicative action. Volume 1: Reason and the rationalization of society, London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1984b) ‘Notizen sur Entwicklung der Interaktionskompetenz’, in Habermas, J. Vorstudien und Ergänzungen zur Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1987) The theory of communicative action. Volume 2: The critique of functionalist reason, Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1989) ‘Notas sobre el desarrollo de la competencia interactiva’, in Habermas, J. Teoría de la acción comunicativa: Complementos y estudios previos, Madrid: Cátedra.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1991a) ‘Martin Heidegger: On the publication of the lectures of 1935’, in Wolin, R. (ed.), The Heidegger controversy. A critical reader, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1991b) ‘Is intentionality more basic than linguistic meaning?’, in Lepore, E. and van Gulick, R. (eds.), John Searle and his critics, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1992b) ‘Work and Weltanschauung: The Heidegger controversy from a German perspective’, in Habermas, J. The new conservatism: Cultural criticism and the historians’ debate, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1995) ‘Reconciliation through the public use of reason: Remarks on John Rawls’s political liberalism’, Journal of Philosophy 92 (3): 109–31.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (2010) ‘The concept of human dignity and the realistic utopia of human rights’, Metaphilosophy 41 (4): 464–80.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. and Luhmann, N. (1971) Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Haraway, D. (1991) Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature, London: Free Association Books.Google Scholar
Hayim, G. (1992) ‘Naturalism and the crisis of rationalism in Habermas’, Social Theory and Practice 18 (2): 182–209.Google Scholar
Hayles, K. N. (1999) How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies, cybernetics, literature and informatics, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hayman, R. (1986) Writing against: A biography of Sartre, London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
Hawkins, S. (2015) ‘Afterword: Reading into the distance’, in Blumenberg, H. The laughter of the Thracian woman: A protohistory of theory, London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. (1991a) ‘The self-assertion of the German university’, in Wolin, R. (ed.), The Heidegger controversy: A critical reader, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. (1991b) ‘“Only a god can save us”: Der Spiegel’s interview with Martin Heidegger’, in Wolin, R. (ed.), The Heidegger controversy: A critical reader, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. (1993a) ‘Letter on humanism’, in Heidegger, M., Basic writings, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. (1993b) ‘The question concerning technology’, in Heidegger, M. Basic writings, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Heinze, M. (2009) ‘Helmut Plessner’s philosophical anthropology’, Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology, 16 (2): 117–28.Google Scholar
Heller, A. (1991a) ‘Can poetry be written after the Holocaust?, in Heller, A. and Feher, F. The grandeur and twilight of radical universalism, New Jersey: Transaction.Google Scholar
Heller, A. (1991b) ‘Hannah Arendt on the “vita contemplativa”’, in Heller, A. and Feher, F. The grandeur and twilight of radical universalism, New Jersey: Transaction.Google Scholar
Heller, A. (1991c) ‘With Castoriadis to Aristotle; from Aristotle to Kant; from Kant to us’, in Heller, A. and Feher, F. The grandeur and twilight of radical universalism, New Jersey: Transaction.Google Scholar
Hochstrasser, T. (2000) Natural law theories in the early enlightenment, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Höffe, O. (1995) ‘Kantian scepticism toward transcendental ethics of communication’, in Benhabib, S. and Dallmayr, F. (eds.), The communicative ethics controversy, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hollis, M. (1977) Models of man. Philosophical thoughts on human action, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Honneth, A. (2005) The struggle for recognition. The moral grammar of social conflicts, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Honneth, A. (2009) ‘Problems of ethical pluralism: Arnold Gehlen’s anthropological ethics’, Iris. European Journal of Philosophy and Public Debate 1 (1): 187–94.Google Scholar
Honneth, A. (2010) ‘Dissolutions of the social: On the social theory of Luc Boltanski and Laurent Thévenot’, Constellations 17 (3): 376–89.Google Scholar
Honneth, A. and Joas, H. (1988) Social action and human nature, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Husserl, E. (1931) ‘Phenomenology and anthropology’, http://religiousstudies.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/15–1931-PHENOMENOLOGY-AND-ANTHROPOLOGY.pdf (last accessed 19 October 2016).Google Scholar
Husserl, E. (1970) The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology, Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Ingram, D. (1993) ‘The limits and possibilities of communicative ethics for democratic theory’, Political Theory 21 (2): 294–321.Google Scholar
Janicaud, D. (1996) The shadow of that thought, Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Joas, H. (1991) ‘The unhappy marriage of hermeneutics and functionalism’, in Honneth, A. and Joas, H. (eds.), Essays on Jürgen Habermas’s theory of communicative action, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Joas, H. (2013) The sacredness of the person: A new genealogy of human rights, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Jonas, H. (1963) The Gnostic religion: The message of the alien god and the beginnings of Christianity, Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Jonas, H. (1980a) ‘Technology and responsibility: Reflections on the new tasks of ethics’, in Jonas, H. Philosophical essays: From ancient creed to technological man, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jonas, H. (1980b) ‘Biological foundations of individuality’, in Jonas, H. Philosophical essays: From ancient creed to technological man, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jonas, H. (1984) The imperative of responsibility: In search of an ethics for the technological age, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jonas, H. (1996) Mortality and morality: A search for the good after Auschwitz, Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Jonas, H. (2001) The phenomenon of life: Towards a philosophical biology, Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Keefe, T. (1988) ‘Sartre’s L’Existentialism est un humanisme’, in Wilcocks, R. (ed.), Critical essays on Jean-Paul Sartre, Boston: G. K. Hall.Google Scholar
Kelly, M. (1988) ‘The Gadamer/Habermas debate revisited: The question of ethics’, Philosophy and Social Criticism 14 (3–4): 369–89.Google Scholar
Kerr, F. (2004) ‘The self and the good: Taylor’s moral ontology’, in Abbey, R. (ed.), Charles Taylor, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
King, A. (1999) ‘Against structure: A critique of morphogenetic social theory’, Sociological Review 47 (2): 199–227.Google Scholar
Kisiel, T. (1992) ‘Heidegger’s apology: Biography as philosophy and ideology’, in Rockmore, T. and Margolis, J. (eds.), The Heidegger case: On philosophy and politics, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Kleinberg, E. (2003) Generation existential: Heidegger’s philosophy in France 1927–1961, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Krüger, H.-P. (1991) ‘Communicative action or the mode of communication for society as a whole’, in Honneth, A. and Joas, H. (eds.), Essays on Jürgen Habermas’s theory of communicative action, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kurtz, P. (ed.) (1973) The humanist alternative: Some definitions of humanism, London: Prometheus.Google Scholar
Lafont, C. (1999) The linguistic turn in hermeneutic philosophy, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lafont, C. (2004) ‘Moral objectivity and reasonable agreement: Can realism be reconciled with constructivism?’, Ratio Juris 17 (1): 27–51.Google Scholar
Laitinen, A. (2008) Strong evaluations without moral sources: On Charles Taylor’s philosophical anthropology and ethics, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (1993) We have never been moderns, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (2004) ‘Whose cosmos, which cosmopolitics? Comments on the peace terms of Ulrich Beck’, Common Knowledge 10 (3): 450–462.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (2013) An enquiry into modes of existence: An anthropology of the moderns, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lazier, B. (2003) ‘Overcoming Gnosticism: Hans Jonas, Hans Blumenberg and the legitimacy of the natural world’, Journal of the History of Ideas 64 (4): 619–37.Google Scholar
Levinas, E. (1990a) ‘Heidegger, Gagarin and us’, in Levinas, E. Difficult freedom: Essays on Judaism, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Levinas, E. (1990b) ‘The name of a dog, or natural rights’, in Levinas, E. Difficult freedom: Essays on Judaism, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Levinas, E. (2006) Humanism of the other, Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Lockwood, D. (1992) ‘Social integration and system integration’, in Lockwood, D. Solidarity and schism: The problem of disorder in Durkheimian and Marxist sociology, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Loewe, D. (2015) ‘Justicia contractual y los seres del futuro’, in Figueroa, M. (ed.), Liberalismo Político, Santiago: Ril.Google Scholar
Losurdo, D. (1992) ‘Heidegger and Hitler’s war’, in Rockmore, T. and Margolis, J. (eds.), The Heidegger case: On philosophy and politics, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Löwith, K. (1970) ‘The nature of man and the world of nature for Heidegger’s 80th birthday’, Southern Journal of Philosophy, 8 (4): 309–18.Google Scholar
Löwith, K. (1991) ‘The political implications of Heidegger’s existentialism’, in Wolin, R. (ed.), The Heidegger controversy: A critical reader, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Löwith, K. (1995) Heidegger and European nihilism, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. (1977) ‘Generalized media and the problem of contingency’, in Loubser, J., Baum, R., Effrat, A., and Lidz, V. (eds.), Explorations in the general theory in social science: Essays in honor of Talcott Parsons, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. (1994) ‘“What is the case?” and “what lies behind it?” The two sociologies and the theory of society’, Sociological Theory 12(2): 126–39.Google Scholar
Lyotard, J.-F. (1990) Heidegger and “the Jews”, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
McCarthy, T. (1973) ‘A theory of communicative competence’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences 3 (1): 135–56.Google Scholar
McCarthy, T. (1979) ‘Translator’s introduction’, in Habermas, J. Communication and the evolution of society, Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Macpherson, C. B. (1964) The political theory of possessive individualism: Hobbes to Locke, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mairet, P. (1979) ‘Introduction’, in Sartre, J.-P.: Existentialism and humanism, London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Marcuse, H. (1973) Reason and revolution: Hegel and the rise of social theory, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Marquard, O. (1989) Farewell to matters of principle: Philosophical studies, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mascareño, A. (2008) ‘Acción, estructura y emergencia en la teoría sociológica’, Revista de Sociología 22: 217–56.Google Scholar
Mascareño, A. (2012) ‘Contingencia como unided la diferencia moderna’, in Cadenas, H., Mascareño, A. and Urquiza, A. (eds.), Niklas Luhmann y el legado universalista de su teoría: Aportes para el análisis de la complejidad social contemporánea, Santiago: RIL.Google Scholar
Mascareño, A. and Chernilo, D. (2009) ‘Obstacles and perspectives of Latin American sociology: Normative universalism and functional differentiation’, Soziale Systeme 15 (1): 72–96.Google Scholar
Matustik, M. (1989) ‘Habermas on communicative reason and performative contradiction’, New German Critique 47 (spring–summer): 143–72.Google Scholar
Mendelson, J. (1979) ‘The Habermas–Gadamer debate’, New German Critique 18 (autumn): 44–73.Google Scholar
Menzies, K. (1977) Talcott Parsons and the social image of man, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964) Sense and non-sense, Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1969) Humanism and terror: An essay on the communist problem, Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
Miranda, P. (2012) La precompresión de lo humano en la sociología de Luhmann: Raíces antropológicas del antihumanismo teórico luhmanniano, Santiago: Ediciones Universidad Alberto Hurtado.Google Scholar
Misgeld, D. (1977) ‘Discourse and conversation: The theory of communicative competence and hermeneutics in the light of the debate between Habermas and Gadamer’, Philosophy and Social Criticism 4 (4): 321–44.Google Scholar
Mitcham, C. (2010) ‘Philosophical biology and environmentalism’, in Tirosh-Samuelson, H. and Wiese, C. (eds.), The legacy of Hans Jonas: Judaism and the phenomenon of life, Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Moon, J. D. (1995) ‘Practical discourse and communicative ethics’, in White, S. K. (ed.), The Cambridge companion to Habermas, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mouzelis, N. (1974) ‘Social and system integration: some reflections on a fundamental distinction’, British Journal of Sociology 25 (4): 395–409.Google Scholar
Mouzelis, N. (1992) ‘Social and system integration: Habermas’ view, British Journal of Sociology 43 (2): 267–88.Google Scholar
Mouzelis, N. (1999) ‘Modernity: A non-European conceptualization’, British Journal of Sociology 50 (1): 141–59.Google Scholar
Münch, R. (1987) Theory of action: Towards a new synthesis going beyond Parsons, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (1992) ‘Human functioning and social justice: In defense of Aristotelian essentialism’, Political Theory 20 (2): 202–46.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (2006) Frontiers of justice: Disability, nationality, species membership, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Owens, R. B. (2010) ‘Producing Parsons’ reputation: Early critiques of Talcott Parsons’ social theory and the making of a caricature’, Journal of the History of Behavioral Sciences 46 (2): 165–88.Google Scholar
Papastephanou, M. (1997) ‘Communicative action and philosophical foundationalism: Comments on the Apel–Habermas debate’, Philosophy and Social Criticism 23 (4): 41–69.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. (1937) The structure of social action: A study in social theory with special reference to a group of recent European writers, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. (1961) ‘An outline of the social system’, in Parsons, T., Shills, E., Naegele, K. and Pitts, J. (eds.), Theories of society, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. (1964a) ‘Evolutionary universals in society’, American Sociological Review 29 (3): 339–57.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. (1966) Societies: Evolutionary and comparative perspectives, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. (1967a) ‘Some comments on the sociology of Karl Marx’, in Parsons, T. Sociological theory and modern society, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. (1967b) ‘Full citizenship for the Negro American?’, in Parsons, T. Sociological theory and modern society, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. (1967c) ‘Polarization of the world and international order’, in Parsons, T. Sociological theory and modern society, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. (1967d) ‘On the concept of political power’, in Parsons, T. Sociological theory and modern society, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. (1967e) ‘On the concept of influence’, in Parsons, T. Sociological theory and modern society, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. (1969a) ‘Order and community in the international social system’ in Parsons, T. Politics and social structure, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. (1969b) ‘On the concept of value-commitments’ in Parsons, T. Politics and social structure, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. (1977) Social systems and the evolution of action theory, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. and Smelser, N. (1956) Economy and society, London and New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul/Free Press.Google Scholar
Pedersen, J. (2008) ‘Habermas’ method: Rational reconstruction’, Philosophy of the social sciences 38 (4): 457–85.Google Scholar
Piiroinen, T. (2014) ‘For “central conflation”: A critique of Archerian dualism’, Sociological Theory 32 (2): 79–99.Google Scholar
Plessner, H. (1970) Laughing and crying: A study of the limits of human behavior, Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Pöggeler, O. (1991) ‘Heidegger’s political self-understanding’, in Wolin, R. (ed.), The Heidegger controversy: A critical reader, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rabinbach, , (2000) In the shadow of catastrophe. German intellectuals between apocalypse and enlightenment, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1995) ‘Political liberalism: A reply to Habermas’, Journal of Philosophy 92 (3): 132–80.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1999b) ‘Kantian constructivism in moral theory’, in Freeman, S. (ed.), John Rawls: Collected papers, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rehberg, K.-S. (2009) ‘Philosophical anthropology from the end of World War I to the 1940s and in a current perspective’, Iris. European Journal of Philosophy and Public Debate 1 (1): 131–52.Google Scholar
Ritzer, G. (1988) ‘Sociological metatheory: A defense of a subfield by a delineation of its parameters’, Sociological Theory 6(2): 187–200.Google Scholar
Rocher, G. (1974) Talcott Parsons and American sociology, London: Thomas Nelson and Sons.Google Scholar
Rockmore, T. (1992) ‘Heidegger’s French connection and the emperor’s new clothes’, in Rockmore, T. and Margolis, J. (eds.), The Heidegger case: On philosophy and politics, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Rockmore, T. (1995) Heidegger and French philosophy: Humanism, antihumanism and being, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rockmore, T. (2009) ‘Foreword to the English edition’, in Faye, E. Heidegger: The introduction of Nazism into philosophy, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. (1994) ‘Taylor on truth’, in Tully, J. (ed.), Philosophy in the age of pluralism, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rose, H. (1995) ‘Goods and life-forms. Relativism in Charles Taylor’s political philosophy’, Radical Philosophy 071 (May/June): 20–6.Google Scholar
Rosa, H. (1998) ‘On defining the good life: liberal freedom and capitalist necessity’, Constellations 5 (2): 201–14.Google Scholar
Safranski, R. (1998) Martin Heidegger: Between good and evil, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sage, D. (2014) How outer space made America: Geography, organization and the cosmic sublime, Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Sayer, A. (2011) Why things matter to people: Social science, values and ethical life, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scheler, M. (2009) The human place in the cosmos, Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Schelsky, H. (1967). El hombre en la civilización científica y otros ensayos. Buenos Aires: Sur.Google Scholar
Schilling, C. (2002) ‘Culture, the “sick role” and the consumption of health’, British Journal of Sociology, 53 (4): 621–638.Google Scholar
Schlossberger, M. (2014) ‘Habermas’s new turn towards Plessner’s philosophical anthropology’, in de Mul, J. (ed.), Plessner’s philosophical anthropology, Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Schnädelbach, H. (1991) ‘The transformation of critical theory’, in Honneth, A. and Joas, H. (eds.), Essays on Jürgen Habermas’s theory of communicative action, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Schneewind, J. (1998) The invention of autonomy: A history of modern moral philosophy, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. (2005) ‘Minds, brains and programs’, in Boden, M. A. (ed.), The philosophy of artificial intelligence, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Seemann, A. (2004) ‘Lifeworld, discourse and realism: On Jürgen Habermas’s theory of truth’, Philosophy and Social Criticism 30 (4): 503–14.Google Scholar
Sheehan, T. (1993) ‘A normal Nazi’, New York Review of Books 40 (1–2), www.nybooks.com/articles/1993/01/14/a-normal-nazi (last accessed August 2106).Google Scholar
Simmel, G. (1949) ‘The sociology of sociability’, American Journal of Sociology 55 (3): 254–61.Google Scholar
Simmel, G. (1950) ‘Fundamental problems of sociology (individual and society)’, in Wolf, K. (ed.), The sociology of Georg Simmel, Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Sloterdijk, P. (2009) ‘Rules for the human zoo: A response to the letter on humanism’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 27: 12–28.Google Scholar
Sluga, H. (1993) Heidegger’s crisis. Philosophy and politics in Nazi Germany, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, N. (2004) ‘Taylor and the hermeneutic tradition’, in Abbey, R. (ed.), Charles Taylor, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stichweh, R. (2008) ‘Strangers, inclusions and identities’, Santiago. [lecture delivered on the doctoral programme at University Alberto Hurtado]Google Scholar
Strauss, L. (2004) ‘Restatement on Xenophon’s Hiero’, in Emberley, P. and Cooper, B. (eds.), Faith and political philosophy: The correspondence between Leo Strauss and Eric Voegelin, 1934–1964, Columbia: University of Missouri Press.Google Scholar
Susen, S. (2015) ‘Towards a dialogue between Pierre Bourdieu’s “critical sociology” and Luc Boltanski’s “pragmatic sociology of critique”’, in Susen, S. and Turner, B. (eds.), The spirit of Luc Boltanski, London: Anthem.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. (1985a) Human agency and language: Philosophical papers 1, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. (1985b) Philosophy and the human sciences: Philosophical papers 2, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. (1989) Sources of the self: The making of modern identity, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. (1991a) ‘Language and society’, in Honneth, A. and Joas, H. (eds.), Essays on Jürgen Habermas’s theory of communicative action, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. (1991b) The ethics of authenticity, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. (1994) ‘The politics of recognition’, in Gutmann, A. (ed.), Multiculturalism: Examining the ethics of recognition, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. (2007) Modern social imaginaries, Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Tchir, T. (2011) ‘Daimon appearances and the Heideggerian influence in Arendt’s account of political action’, in Yeatman, A., Hansen, P., Zolkos, M. and Barbour, C. (eds.), Action and appearance: Ethics and the politics of writing in Hannah Arendt, London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Theunissen, M. (1985) The other: Studies in the social ontology of Husserl, Sartre, Heidegger and Buber, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Timmermans, S. and Haas, S. (2008) ‘Towards a sociology of disease’, Sociology of Health and Illness 30 (5): 659–76.Google Scholar
Toby, J. (1977) ‘Parsons’ theory of societal evolution’, in Parsons, T. The evolution of modern societies, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Tönnies, F. (2005) ‘Ways and goals of sociology’, in Adair-Toteff, C. (ed.), Sociological beginnings: The first conference of the German society for sociology, Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
Turing, A. (2005) ‘Computing machinery and intelligence’, in Boden, M. A. (ed.), The philosophy of artificial intelligence, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vandenberghe, F. (2005) ‘The Archers. A tale of folk (final episode?)’, European Journal of Social Theory 8 (2): 227–37.Google Scholar
Varul, M. Z. (2010) ‘Talcott Parsons, the sick role and chronic illness’, Body and Society 16 (2): 72–94.Google Scholar
Voegelin, E. (1962) ‘World-empire and the unity of mankind’, International Affairs 38 (2): 170–88.Google Scholar
Voegelin, E. (1999) ‘Hitler and the Germans’, in The collected works of Eric Voegelin, volume 31, Columbia: University of Missouri Press.Google Scholar
Voegelin, E. (2000) ‘The new science of politics’, in The collected works of Eric Voegelin, volume 5, Columbia: University of Missouri Press.Google Scholar
Vogel, L. (2001) ‘Foreword’, in Jonas, J. The phenomenon of life. Towards a philosophical biology, Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
von Uexküll, J. (2010) A foray into the worlds of animals and humans, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Wagner, P. (1999) ‘After justification: Repertoires of evaluation and the sociology of modernity’, European Journal of Social Theory 2 (3): 341–57.Google Scholar
Wagner, P. (2006) ‘Social theory and political philosophy’, in Delanty, G. (ed.), Handbook of European social theory, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Walby, S., Armstrong, J. and Stird, S. (2012) ‘Intersectionality: Multiple inequalities in social theory’, Sociology 46 (2): 224–40.Google Scholar
Walzer, M. (1984) Spheres of justice: A defense of pluralism and equality, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Warren, M. E. (1995) ‘The self in discursive democracy’, in White, S. K. (ed.), The Cambridge companion to Habermas, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weinstein, M. and Weinstein, D. (1971) ‘Sartre and the humanist tradition of sociology’, in Warnock, M. (ed.), Sartre, New York: Anchor.Google Scholar
White, S. K. and Farr, E. R. (2012) ‘“No-saying” in Habermas’, Political Theory 40 (1): 32–57.Google Scholar
Wiener, N. (1954) The human use of human beings: Cybernetics and society, Boston: Da Capo Press.Google Scholar
Wiese, C. (2010) The life and thought of Hans Jonas: Jewish dimensions, Waltham, MA: Brandeis University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, S. J. (2005) ‘Parsons revisited: from the sick role to … ?’, Health 9 (2): 123–44.Google Scholar
Wolin, R. (1993) ‘Preface to the MIT edition: Note on a missing text’, in Wolin, R. (ed.), The Heidegger controversy: A critical reader, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wolin, R. (2001) Heidegger’s children: Hannah Arendt, Karl Löwith, Hans Jonas and Herbert Marcuse, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wolters, G. (2001) ‘Hans Jonas’ philosophical biology’, Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 23 (1): 85–98.Google Scholar
Wood, D. (ed.) (1993) Of Derrida, Heidegger and spirit, Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Young-Bruehl, E. (2004) Hannah Arendt: For love of the world, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Yuval-Davis, N. (2006) ‘Intersectionality and feminist politics’, European Journal of Women’s Studies 13 (3): 193–209.Google Scholar
You have
Access
Open access