Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-vt8vv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-08-13T05:18:32.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

TABLETTES DE LA COLLECTION DE MICHEL DE GENOUILLAC

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 October 2017

Camille Lecompte  and
Christine Pariselle
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Henri de Genouillac (1881–1940), one of the leading Assyriologists of his time, owned a collection of cuneiform tablets and inscribed artefacts. On his death, it was divided into two parts. Whereas the majority of these objects were bequeathed to the Musée des Antiquités in Rouen, his native city, a smaller part remained the property of his nephew, Michel de Genouillac. The present paper, which offers the publication of the latter, also aims to reconstruct its history. The Michel de Genouillac collection consists of 20 Ur III tablets (9 from Puzriš-Dagan, 10 from Girsu, 1 of uncertain origin), 1 clay cone with an inscription of Gudea and 5 Sargonic administrative tablets from Girsu.

Type
Research Article
Information
IRAQ , Volume 79 , December 2017 , pp. 105 - 127
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute for the Study of Iraq 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliographie

Alivernini, S. 2013. La struttura amministrativa del mar-sa nella documentazione della III Dinastia di Ur, Rivista degli studi orientali Supplemento no 1. Rome : Fabrizio Serra Editore.Google Scholar
Amiet, P. 1957. “Les intailles orientales de la collection Henri de Genouillac conservées au Musée Départemental des Antiquités de Seine-Maritime à Rouen”, Cahiers de Byrsa, 1957/7: 35–73.Google Scholar
Amiet, P. 1959. “Les Antiquités orientales de la Collection H. de Genouillac à Rouen”, La Revue des Arts 1959/2: 80–84.Google Scholar
Boschloos, V., Devillers, A., Gubel, É., Hameeuw, H., Jean, C., Van Goethem, L., Van Overmeire, S., Overlaet, B. 2012. “The Ancient Near Eastern glyptic collections of the Royal Museums of Art and History Reconsidered”, Bulletin des Musées Royaux. Parc du Cinquantenaire 83: 23–43.Google Scholar
Charpin, D. 1988. “Sippar : deux villes jumelles”. Revue d'assyriologie 82: 13–32.Google Scholar
Charpin, D. 2005. “Chroniques bibliographiques 5. Économie et société à Sippar et en Babylonie du Nord à l’époque paléo-babylonienne”. Revue d'assyriologie et d'archéologie orientale 99: 133–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charpin, D. 2014. “The historian and the Old Babylonian archives”, in Baker, H. D. et Jursa, M., éds. Documentary Sources in Ancient Near Eastern and Greco-Roman Economic History. Methodology and Practice, Oxford and Philadelphia: Oxbow Books. pp. 24–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Civil, M. 1996. HAR-ra = hubullu: Tablet X dug = karpatu apud Sallaberger 1996, pp. 129–159.Google Scholar
Garelli, P. 1957. “Trois tablettes cappadociennes du Musée de Rouen”. Revue d'assyriologie et d'archéologie orientale 51: 1–10.Google Scholar
Genouillac, H. de. 1924a. Premières recherches archéologiques à Kich. Mission d'Henri de Genouillac 1911–1912. Tome premier. Paris : Edouard Champion.Google Scholar
Genouillac, H. de. 1924b. “Choix de textes économiques de la collection Pupil”. Babyloniaca 8: 37–40.Google Scholar
Genouillac, H. de. 1930. “Nouveaux princes et cités nouvelles de Sumer”. Revue de l'histoire des religions 101: 216–222.Google Scholar
Hilgert, M. 1998. Drehem Administrative Documents from the Reign of Šulgi. Oriental Institute Publications 115. Chicago : The Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Hilgert, M. 2003. Drehem Administrative Documents from the Reign of Amar-Suena. Oriental Institute Publications 121. Chicago : The Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Huh, S. K. 2008. Studien zur Region Lagaš. Von der Ubaid- bis zur altbabylonischen Zeit. Alter Orient und Altes Testament 345. Münster : Ugarit-Verlag.Google Scholar
Liu, C. 2015. “Organization, Administrative Practices and Written Documentation at Puzriš-Dagan during the Reign of Amar-Suen”, thèse inédite, Heidelberg. Téléchargeable sur le lien : http://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/volltextserver/19005/ Google Scholar
Mander, P. 1994. An Archive of Kennelmen and Other Workers in Ur III Lagash, Annali dell'Istituto Universitario Orientale di Napoli, Supplemento 80. Naples : Istituto Universitario Orientale.Google Scholar
Mander, P. 1998. “A minor archive of Ur III Lagash for the provisions of the governors”. Aula Orientalis 16: 193–247.Google Scholar
Michalowski, P. 2008. “Observations on ‘Elamites’ and ‘Elam’ in Ur III times”, in Michalowski, P., éd. On the Third Dynasty of Ur. Studies in Honor of Marcel Sigrist. Journal of Cuneiform Studies, Supplementary Series 1. Boston : American Schools of Oriental Research. pp. 109–123.Google Scholar
Molina, M. 2008. “The corpus of Neo-Sumerian tablets: an overview”, in Garfinkle, S. J. et Johnson, J. C., éds. The Growth of an Early State in Mesopotamia: Studies in Ur III Administration, Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas. pp. 19–53.Google Scholar
Molina, M. 2014. Sargonic Cuneiform Tablets in the Real Academia de la Historia. The Carl L. Lippmann Collection. Real Academia de la Historia I.1.6. Madrid : Real Academia de la Historia.Google Scholar
Notizia, P. 2009. I testi dei messaggeri da Ĝirsu-Lagaš della Terza Dinastia di Ur. Nisaba 22. Messine : Di.Sc.A.M. Google Scholar
Paoletti, P. / Spada, G. 2005. Testi še-ur5-ra da Girsu conservati al British Museu. Nisaba 10. Messine : Di.Sc.A.M. Google Scholar
Petit-Augarde, C. 2012. La collection Genouillac au Musée Départemental des Antiquités de Rouen, Mémoire inédit de Master 2, Université de Paris-Sorbonne.Google Scholar
Pomponio, F. 2013. “The Ur III administration: workers, messengers, and sons”, in Garfinkle, S. et Molina, M., éds. From the 21st Century B.C. to the 21st Century A.D. Proceedings of the International Conference on Neo-Sumerian Studies Held in Madrid, 22–24 July 2010. Winona Lake : Eisenbrauns. pp. 221–232.Google Scholar
Powell, M. 1987–1990. “Masse und Gewichte”. Reallexikon der Assyriologie und Vorderasiatischen Archäologie 7: 457–517.Google Scholar
Sachs, A.J. 1955. Late Babylonian Astronomical and Related Texts. Providence, Rhode Island: Brown University Press.Google Scholar
Sallaberger, W. 1996. Der babylonische Töpfer und seine Gefässe nach Urkunden altsumerischer bis altbabylonischer Zeit sowie lexikalischen und literarischen Zeugnissen. Mesopotamian Society and Environment Series II: Memoirs 3. Gand : University of Ghent.Google Scholar
Sauren, H. 1969. Wirtschaftsurkunden aus der Zeit der III. Dynastie von Ur im Besitz des Musée d'art et d'histoire in Genf. Naples : Istituto Orientale di Napoli.Google Scholar
Schrakamp, I. 2015. “Geographical horizons of the Presargonic and Sargonic archives”, in Sallaberger, W. et Schrakamp, I., eds. ARCANE III. History and Philology. Turnhout : Brepols. pp. 197–270.Google Scholar
Selz, G. 1989/1990. “Eine Urkunde über Festgaben von Tempelverwaltern und anderen Notabeln aus dem Musée des Antiquités zu Rouen (H. G. 12)”. Welt des Orients 20–21: 35–44.Google Scholar
Sigrist, M. 1992. Drehem. Bethesda : CDL Press.Google Scholar
Sommerfeld, W. 2015. “The transition from the Old Akkadian period to Ur III in Lagash”, in Sallaberger, W. et Schrakamp, I., éds. ARCANE III. History and Philology. Turnhout : Brepols. pp. 271–280.Google Scholar
Steible, H. 1991. Die neusumerischen Bau- und Weihinschrifen. Teil 1. Inschriften der II. Dynastie von Lagaš. FAOS 9/1. Stuttgart : Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Steinkeller, P. 2013. “Corvée labor in Ur III times”, in Garfinkle, S. et Molina, M. éds. From the 21st Century B.C. to the 21st Century A.D. Proceedings of the International Conference on Neo-Sumerian Studies Held in Madrid, 22–24 July 2010, Winona Lake : Eisenbrauns. pp. 347–424.Google Scholar
Studevent-Hickman, B. 2006. “The Organization of Manual Labor in Ur III Babylonia”, thèse de doctorat inédite, Harvard.Google Scholar
Verderame, L. 2010. “Mar-tu nel III millennio: fonti e interpretazioni”. Rivista degli studi orientali 82 : 229–260.Google Scholar
Weiershäuser, F. 2008. Die königlichen Frauen der III. Dynastie von Ur. Göttinger Beiträge zum Alten Orient 1. Göttingen : Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar