Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-27T09:21:29.902Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Roman Nobility, the Early Consular Fasti, and the Consular Tribunate*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2017

J. H. Richardson
J. H. Richardson*
Affiliation:
Massey UniversityJ.H.Richardson@Massey.ac.nz
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

While the general absence of Rome’s nobility from the traditions of the regal period has often been noted, the nobility’s prompt appearance at the beginning of the republican period has elicited little comment. This paper argues that the nobility’s appearance is more significant than its earlier absence, precisely on account of its very promptness and also because the nobility appears primarily with the consulship. Given the special importance that the consulship later came to have, following the emergence of Rome’s office-holding nobility, these circumstances inevitably raise questions about the value of the early consular fasti, and indeed even about the whole premise on which the early fasti are based, namely that the consulship was established immediately after the expulsion of the kings. It is argued here that this premise is anachronistic, and that the early consular fasti are unreliable and often tendentious; it is further argued that this premise is also responsible for some of the confusion surrounding the mysterious consular tribunate. The consular tribunate was a magistracy about which ancient writers quite clearly knew very little, and their ignorance and the inconsistencies in what they had to say about the tribunate inevitably undermine their claim to possess better and more detailed information about earlier times.

Type
Research Article
Information
Antichthon , Volume 51: Thematic Issue: Politics and Power in Early Rome 509-264 BC , 2017 , pp. 77 - 100
Copyright
© The Australasian Society for Classical Studies 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I should like to thank the Marsden Fund for its generous support, which has helped to make the completion of this paper possible.

References

Adcock, F. E. (1957), ‘Consular Tribunes and Their Successors’, JRS 47, 9-14.Google Scholar
Armstrong, J. (2016), War and Society in Early Rome, from Warlords to Generals. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Badian, E. (1966), ‘The Early Historians’, in T. A. Dorey (ed.), Latin Historians. 1-38. London.Google Scholar
Badian, E. (1990a), ‘Diskussion. Sektion II: Quellen und Quellenkritik’, in W. Eder (ed.), Staat und Staatlichkeit in der frühen römischen Republik. 208-217. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Badian, E. (1990b), ‘Kommentar. Sektion V: Magistratur und Gesellschaft’, in W. Eder (ed.), Staat und Staatlichkeit in der frühen römischen Republik. 458-475. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Bispham, E. H. and T. J., Cornell (2013), ‘Q. Fabius Pictor’, in T. J. Cornell et al. (eds), The Fragments of the Roman Historians, Volume I: Introduction. 160-178. Oxford.Google Scholar
Boddington, A. (1959), ‘The Original Nature of the Consular Tribunate’, Historia 8, 356-364.Google Scholar
Brennan, C. (2000), The Praetorship in the Roman Republic, 2 vols. Oxford.Google Scholar
Briscoe, J. (2013), ‘Paulus Clodius’, in T. J. Cornell et al. (eds), The Fragments of the Roman Historians, Volume I: Introduction. 264-265. Oxford.Google Scholar
Broughton, T. R. S. (1951), The Magistrates of the Roman Republic, Volume I: 509 B.C.-100 B.C. New York.Google Scholar
Cornell, T. J. (1995), The Beginnings of Rome: Italy and Rome from the Bronze Age to the Punic Wars (c. 1000-264 BC). London.Google Scholar
Cornell, T. J. (2005), ‘The Value of the Literary Tradition Concerning Archaic Rome’, in K. A. Raaflaub (ed.), Social Struggles in Archaic Rome: New Perspectives on the Conflict of the Orders, 2nd edn. 47-74. Malden, MA.Google Scholar
Drogula, F. K. (2015), Commanders and Command in the Roman Republic and Early Empire. Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Drummond, A. (1989), ‘Rome in the Fifth Century II: The Citizen Community’, in F. W. Walbank, A. E. Astin, M. W. Frederiksen, R. M. Ogilvie, and A. Drummond (eds), The Cambridge Ancient History, vol. 7.2, 2nd edn. 172-242. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. (2007), Caesar’s Calendar: Ancient Time and the Beginnings of History. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Flaig, E. (2003), Ritualisierte Politik: Zeichen, Gesten und Herrschaft im Alten Rom. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Flower, H. I. (2009), ‘Alternatives to Written History in Republican Rome’, in A. Feldherr (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Historians. 65-76. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Forsythe, G. (1999), Livy and Early Rome: A Study in Historical Method and Judgment. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Forsythe, G. (2005), A Critical History of Early Rome, from Prehistory to the First Punic War. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Fritz, K. von (1950), ‘The Reorganisation of the Roman Government in 366 B.C. and the So-Called Licinio-Sextian Laws’, Historia 1, 3-44.Google Scholar
Giovannini, A. (1998), ‘Les livres auguraux’, in La mémoire perdue: Recherches sur l’administration romaine. 103-122. Rome.Google Scholar
Hedrick, C.W. Jr.(2002), ‘The Prehistory of Greek Chronography’, in V. B. Gorman and E. W. Robinson (eds), Oikistes: Studies in Constitutions, Colonies, and Military Power in the Ancient World Offered in Honor of A. J. Graham. 13-32. Leiden.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (1993), ‘Conquest, Competition and Consensus: Roman Expansion in Italy and the Rise of the Nobilitas ’, Historia 42, 12-39.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (1999), ‘Römische Gentes und griechische Genealogien’, in G. Vogt-Spira and B. Rommel (eds), Rezeption und Identität: Die kulturelle Auseinandersetzung Roms mit Griechenland als europäisches Paradigma. 3-21. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Jones, L. (2016), ‘Memory, Nostalgia and the Roman Home’, in M. García Morcillo, J. H. Richardson, and F. Santangelo (eds), Ruin or Renewal? Places and the Transformation of Memory in the City of Rome. 183-211. Rome.Google Scholar
Kajanto, I. (1965), The Latin Cognomina. Helsinki.Google Scholar
Kvium, C. (2008), ‘Identifying Identities – Some Thoughts about gentes and gentiles in Archaic Rome’, in A. H. Rasmussen and S. W. Rasmussen (eds), Religion and Society: Rituals, Resources and Identity in the Ancient Graeco-Roman World. The BOMOS-Conferences 2002-2005. 267-285. Rome.Google Scholar
La Rosa, F. (1994), ‘I ‘tribuni militum’ tra le istituzioni dell’alta repubblica’, Iura 45, 15-33.Google Scholar
Linderski, J. (1990), ‘The Auspices and the Struggle of the Orders’, in W. Eder (ed.), Staat und Staatlichkeit in der frühen römischen Republik. 34-48. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R. E. (2005), ‘The Definition of patres and plebs: An End to the Struggle of the Orders’, in K. A. Raaflaub (ed.), Social Struggles in Archaic Rome: New Perspectives on the Conflict of the Orders, 2nd edn. 128-167. Malden, MA.Google Scholar
Möller, A. (2001), ‘The Beginning of Chronography: Hellanicus’ Hiereiai ’, in N. Luraghi (ed.), The Historian’s Craft in the Age of Herodotus. 241-262. Oxford.Google Scholar
Möller, A. (2004), ‘Greek Chronographic Traditions about the First Olympic Games’, in R. M. Rosen (ed.), Time and Temporality in the Ancient World. 169-184. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. (1963), ‘An Interim Report on the Origins of Rome’, JRS 53, 95-121.Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. (1969), ‘The Origins of the Roman Republic’, in C. S. Singleton (ed.), Interpretation: Theory and Practice. 1-34. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. (1989), ‘The Origins of Rome’, in F. W. Walbank, A. E. Astin, M. W. Frederiksen, R. M. Ogilvie, and A. Drummond (eds), The Cambridge Ancient History, vol. 7.2, 2nd edn. 52-112. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. (1990), The Classical Foundations of Modern Historiography. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Münzer, F. (1920), Römische Adelsparteien und Adelsfamilien. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Oakley, S. P. (1997-2005), A Commentary on Livy, Books VI-X, 4 vols. Oxford.Google Scholar
Ogilvie, R. M. (1965), A Commentary on Livy, Books 1-5. Oxford.Google Scholar
Drummond, A.(1989), ‘The Sources for Early Roman History’, in F. W. Walbank, A. E. Astin, M. W. Frederiksen, R. M. Ogilvie, and A. Drummond (eds), The Cambridge Ancient History, vol. 7.2, 2nd edn. 1-29. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Pais, E. (1899), Storia di Roma I.2. Turin.Google Scholar
Pais, E. (1913), Storia critica di Roma durante i primi cinque secoli I.1. Rome.Google Scholar
Rawson, E. (2014), ‘Cicero the Historian and Cicero the Antiquarian’, in J. H. Richardson and F. Santangelo (eds), The Roman Historical Tradition: Regal and Republican Rome. 259-283. Oxford. (=JRS 62 [1972], 33-45; E. Rawson [1991], Roman Culture and Society, Collected Papers. 58-79. Oxford.)Google Scholar
Rich, J. W. (2013), ‘Annales Maximi’, in T. J. Cornell et al. (eds), The Fragments of the Roman Historians, Volume I: Introduction. 141-159. Oxford.Google Scholar
Richard, J.-C. (1990), ‘Réflexions sur le Tribunat consulaire’, MEFRA 102, 767-799.Google Scholar
Richard, J.-C. (1992), ‘Tribuns militaires et triomphe’, in La Rome des premiers siècles: Légende et histoire. 235-246. Florence.Google Scholar
Richardson, J. H. (2008), ‘Ancient Historical Thought and the Development of the Consulship’, Latomus 67, 328-341.Google Scholar
Richardson, J. H. (2012), The Fabii and the Gauls: Studies in Historical Thought and Historiography in Republican Rome. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Richardson, J. H. (2014), ‘‘Firsts’ and the Historians of Rome’, Historia 63, 17-37.Google Scholar
Ridley, R. T. (1980), ‘Fastenkritik: A Stocktaking’, Athenaeum 58, 264-298.Google Scholar
——Ridley, R. T. (1983), ‘ Falsi triumphi, plures consulatus ’, Latomus 42, 372-382.Google Scholar
Ridley, R. T. (1986), ‘The ‘Consular Tribunate’: The Testimony of Livy’, Klio 68, 444-465.Google Scholar
Ridley, R. T. et al. (1990), ‘Diskussion. Sektion VI: Außenbeziehungen und innere Entwicklung’, in W. Eder (ed.), Staat und Staatlichkeit in der frühen römischen Republik. 546-559. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Ross Holloway, R. (2008), ‘Who Were the Tribuni Militum Consulari Potestate?’, AC 77, 107-125.Google Scholar
Rüpke, J. (1993), ‘Livius, Priesternamen und die annales maximi ’, Klio 75, 155-179.Google Scholar
Rüpke, J. (1995), ‘ Fasti: Quellen oder Produkte römischer Geschichtsschreibung?’, Klio 77, 184-202.Google Scholar
Rüpke, J. (2008), Fasti Sacerdotum: A Prosopography of Pagan, Jewish, and Christian Religious Officials in the City of Rome, 300 BC to AD 499, translated by D. M. B. Richardson. Oxford.Google Scholar
Sealey, R. (1959), ‘Consular Tribunes Once More’, Latomus 18, 521-530.Google Scholar
Smith, C. J. (2006), The Roman Clan: The Gens from Ancient Ideology to Modern Anthropology. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Smith, C. J. (2011a), ‘Thinking about Kings’, BICS 54, 21-42.Google Scholar
Smith, C. J. (2011b), ‘The Magistrates of the Early Roman Republic’, in H. Beck, A. Duplá, M. Jehne, and F. Pina Polo (eds), Consuls and Res Publica: Holding High Office in the Roman Republic. 19-40. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Sohlberg, D. (1991), ‘Militärtribunen und verwandte Probleme der frühen römischen Republik’, Historia 40, 257-274.Google Scholar
Staveley, E. S. (1953), ‘The Significance of the Consular Tribunate’, JRS 43, 30-36.Google Scholar
Stewart, R. (1998), Public Office in Early Rome: Ritual Procedure and Political Practice. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Taylor, L. R. (1951), Review of K. Hanell (1946), Das altrömische eponyme Amt. Lund, AJPh 72, 69-72.Google Scholar
Taylor, L. R. (1960), The Voting Districts of the Roman Republic: The Thirty-five Urban and Rural Tribes. Rome.Google Scholar
Urso, G. (2005), Cassio Dione e i magistrati: le origini della repubblica nei frammenti della Storia romana. Milan.Google Scholar
Versnel, H. S. (1970), Triumphus: An Inquiry into the Origin, Development and Meaning of the Roman Triumph. Leiden.Google Scholar
Walt, S. (1997), Der Historiker C. Licinius Macer: Einleitung, Fragmente, Kommentar. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Wikander, Ö. (1993), ‘Senators and Equites V. Ancestral Pride and Genealogical Studies in Late Republican Rome’, OpRom 19, 77-90.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. (1979), Clio’s Cosmetics: Three Studies in Greco-Roman Literature. Leicester.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. (1995), Remus: A Roman Myth. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. (2004), The Myths of Rome. Exeter.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. (2008), Unwritten Rome. Exeter.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. (2009), Remembering the Roman People: Essays on Late-Republican Politics and Literature. Oxford.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. (2016), How Old is Exeter? Divining the Distant Past with W. G. Hoskins. Exeter.Google Scholar