Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-tdptf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T12:43:04.896Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Leskernick: Stone Worlds; Alternative Narratives; Nested Landscapes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2014

Barbara Bender ,
Sue Hamilton  and
Christopher Tilley
Barbara Bender
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University College, Gowe Street, London WC1E 6BT
Sue Hamilton
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, University College, 31-34 Gordon Square, London WC1H OPY
Christopher Tilley
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University College, Gowe Street, London WC1E 6BT Department of Archaeology, University College, 31-34 Gordon Square, London WC1H OPY
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The first season of an on-going project focused on Leskernick Hill, north-west Bodmin Moor, Cornwall, entailed a preliminary settlement survey and limited excavation of a stone row terminal. Leskernick comprises a western and a southern settlement situated on the lower, stony slopes of the hill and including 51 circular stone houses constructed using a variety of building techniques. Walled fields associated with these houses vary in size from 0.25–1 ha and appear to have accreted in a curvilinear fashion from a number of centres. Five smal burial mounds and a cist are associated with the southern settlement, all but one lying around the periphery of the field system. The western settlement includes ‘cairn-like’ piles of stones within and between some houses and some hut circles may have been converted into cairns. The settlements may have been built sequentially but the layout of each adheres to a coherent design suggesting a common broad phase of use. The southern settlement overlooks a stone-free plain containing a ceremonial complex.

The paper presents a narrative account of the work and considers not only the form, function, and chronology of the sites at Leskernick but also seeks to explore the relationships between people and the landscape they inhabit; the prehistoric symbolic continuum from house to field to stone row etc, and to investigate the relationship between archaeology as a discourse on the past and archaeology as practice in the present. It considers how the daily process of excavation generates alternative site histories which are subsequently abandoned, forgotten, perpetuated or transformed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 63 , 1997 , pp. 147 - 178
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Bapty, I. & Yates, T. (eds), 1990. Archaeology after Structuralism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Barrett, J. 1994. Fragments from Antiquity. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Barnatt, J. 1980. Lesser known stone circles in Cornwall. Cornish Archaeology 19, 17–29.Google Scholar
Barnatt, J. 1982. Prehistoric Cornwall: the ceremonial monuments. Wellingborough: Turnstone Press.Google Scholar
Barnatt, J. 1989. Stone Circles of Britain. Oxford: British Archaeological Report 215.Google Scholar
Bender, B. 1992. Theorising landscapes, and the prehistoric landscapes of Stonehenge. Man 27, 735–55.Google Scholar
Bender, B. (ed.). 1993. Landscape: politics and perspectives. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Binford, L. 1972. An Archaeological Perspective. London: Seminar Press.Google Scholar
Burl, A. 1976. Stone Circles of the British Isles. New HavenYale University Press.Google Scholar
Burl, A. 1993. From Carnac to Callanish. New Haven: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
Butler, J. 1994. Dartmoor Atlas of Antiquities, Volume 4. The South-East. Tiverton: Devon Books.Google Scholar
Christie, P.M. 1988. A barrow cemetery on Davidstow Moor, Cornwall: wartime excavations by C K Croft Andrew 1941–1942. Cornish Archaeology 26, 27–169.Google Scholar
Gearey, B. & Charman, D. 1996. Rough Tor, Bodmin Moor: testing some archaeological hypotheses with landscape scale palynology. In Charman, D.J., Newnham, R.M. & Croot, D.G. (eds), Devon and East Cornwall Field Guide. London: Quaternary Research Association, 101–19.Google Scholar
Gell, A. 1985. How to read a map: remarks on the practical logic of navigation. Man 20, 271–86.Google Scholar
Hawkes, C. 1954. Archaeological theory and method: some suggestions from the old world. American Anthropologist 56, 55–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodder, I. 1984. Burial, houses, women and men in the European Neolithic. In Miller, D. & Tilley, C. (eds), Ideology, Power and Prehistory, 51–68. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 1986. Reading the Past. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 1989. Writing archaeology: site reports in context. Antiquity 63, 268–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodder, I. 1990. The Domestication of Europe. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 1992. Theory and Practice in Archaeology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Johnson, N. & Rose, P. 1994. Bodmin Moor An Archaeological Survey. Volume I: The Human Landscape to c. 1800. London: English Heritage Archaeological Report 24.Google Scholar
Mercer, R. 1970. The excavation of a Bronze Age hut-circle settlement, Stannon Down, St. Breward, Cornwall, 1968. Cornish Archaeology 9, 17–46.Google Scholar
Miles, H. 1975. Barrows on the St Austell granite. Cornish Archaeology 14, 5–81.Google Scholar
Padel, O. 1985. Cornish place-name elements. English Place Name Society 56–7, 38–40, 150–1.Google Scholar
Pearson, G.W. & Stuiver, M. 1986. High-precision calibration of the radiocarbon timescale, 500–2500 BC. Radiocarbon 28, 839–62.Google Scholar
Richards, C. 1993. Monumental choreography: architecture and spatial representation in late Neolithic Orkney, in Tilley, C. (ed.), 1993, 143–78.Google Scholar
Salmond, A. 1982. Theoretical landscapes: on cross-cultural conceptions of knowledge. In Parkin, D. (ed.), Semantic Anthropology, 64–87. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Shanks, M. & Tilley, C. 1987. Social Theory and Archaeology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Shanks, M, & Tilley, C. 1992. Reconstructing Archaeology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Thomas, J. 1991. Rethinking the Neolithic. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Tilley, C. 1989. Excavation as theatre. Antiquity 63, 275–80.Google Scholar
Tilley, C. (ed.). 1990. Reading Material Culture. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tilley, C. (ed.). 1993. Interpretative Archaeology. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Tilley, C. 1994. The Phenomenology of Landscape. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Tilley, C. 1996. The powers of rocks: topography and monument construction on Bodmin Moor. World Archaeology 28(2), 161–76.Google Scholar
Tilley, C. In press. Rocks as resources: landscapes and power. Cornish Archaeology 35.Google Scholar