Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-5lx2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T11:49:38.043Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Therapeutic Jurisprudence in Practice: Changes in Family Treatment Court Norms Over Time

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Suzanna Fay‐Ramirez
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Family treatment court (FTC) is an example of an increasing number of problem‐centered courts currently operating in the United States. Problem‐centered courts such as FTC encompass the ideas of therapeutic jurisprudence but operate within the broader court system. Presented are the results of an FTC case study that seeks to understand the evolution of courtroom norms and practice over time. Observations of courtroom interactions and interviews with courtroom personnel show that initial observations are consistent with the ideals of therapeutic jurisprudence. However, over time, daily demands and pressures on the courtroom undermine the therapeutic approach.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 40 , Issue 1 , Winter 2015 , pp. 205 - 236
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aos, Steve, Miller, Marna, and Drake, Elizabeth 2006. Evidence Based Public Policy Options to Reduce Future Prison Construction, Criminal Justice Costs and Crime Rates. Federal Sentencing Review 19 (4): 275–290.Google Scholar
Baar, Carl, and Solomon, Freda F. 2000. The Role of the Courts: The Two Faces of Justice. Court Manager 15 (3): 19–27.Google Scholar
Banks, Duren, and Gottfredson, Denise C. 2004. Participation in Drug Treatment Court and Time to Rearrest. Justice Quarterly 21 (3): 637–658.Google Scholar
Barth, Richard 1996. The Juvenile Court and Dependency Cases. Future of Children 6 (3): 100–110.Google Scholar
Beckett, Katherine, and Sasson, Theodore 2004. The Politics of Injustice: Crime and Punishment in America. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Berman, Greg, and Feinblatt, John 2001. Problem‐Solving Courts: A Brief Primer. Law and Policy 23 (2): 125–140.Google Scholar
BJA Drug Court Clearinghouse Project. 2011. Summary of Impact/Outcome Findings Reported for Family Drug Court Programs: 2000—Present. Washington, DC: American University Press. http://www.ndcrc.org/content/summary‐impactoutcome‐findings‐reported‐family‐drug‐court‐programs‐part‐2 (accessed August 1, 2013).Google Scholar
Blumberg, Abraham S. 1967. The Practice of Law as Confidence Game—Organizational Cooptation of a Profession. Law and Society Review 1:15–39.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, John. 1989. Crime, Shame and Reintegration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bruns, Eric J., Pullmann, Michael D., Weathers, Ericka S., Wirschem, Mark L., and Murphy, Jill K. 2012. Effects of a Multidisciplinary Family Treatment Drug Court on Child and Family Outcomes: Results of a Quasi‐Experimental Study. Child Maltreatment 17 (3): 218–230.Google Scholar
Burns, Stacy Lee, and Peyrot, Mark 2003. Tough Love: Nurturing and Coercing Responsibility and Recovery in California Drug Courts. Social Problems 50 (3): 416–438.Google Scholar
Carey, S. M., Mackin, J. R., and Finigan, M. W. 2012. What Works? The Ten Key Components of Drug Court: Research‐Based Best Practices, Drug Court Review 8 (1): 6–42.Google Scholar
Cicourel, Aaron V. 1995. The Social Organization of Juvenile Justice. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
Dakof, Gayle A., Cohen, Jeri B., Henderson, Craig E., Duarte, Eliette, Boustani, Maya, Blackburn, Audra, Venzer, Ellen, and Hawes, Sam 2010. A Randomized Pilot Study of the Engaging Moms Program for Family Drug Court. Journal of Substance Abuse and Treatment 38 (3): 263–274.Google Scholar
Douglas, James W., and Hartley, Roger E. 2004. Sustaining Drug Court in Arizona and South Carolina: An Experience in Hodgepodge Budgeting. Justice System Journal 25 (1): 75–86.Google Scholar
Downey, P. Mitchell, and Roman, John K. 2010. A Bayesian Meta‐Analysis of Drug Court Cost‐Effectiveness. Washington, DC: Crime Policy Institute.Google Scholar
Eisenstein, James, Flemming, Roy B., and Nardulli, Peter F. 1988. The Contours of Justice: Communities and Their Courts. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Co.Google Scholar
Emerson, Robert M. 2001. Contemporary Research: Perspectives and Formulations. Los Angeles, CA: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
Emerson, Robert M., Fretz, Rachael I., and Shaw, Linda L. 1995. Writing Ethnographic Field Notes. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Feeley, Malcolm 1979. The Process Is the Punishment: Handling Cases in a Lower Criminal Court. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Feld, Barry 1990. The Punitive Juvenile Court and the Quality of Procedural Justice: Disjunctions Between Rhetoric and Reality. Crime and Delinquency 36 (4): 443–466.Google Scholar
Flemming, Roy B., Nardulli, Peter F., and Eisenstein, James 1992. The Craft of Justice: Politics and Work in Criminal Court Communities. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold 1956. Conditions of Successful Degradation Ceremonies. American Journal of Sociology 61 (5): 420–424.Google Scholar
Gilmore, Amna S., Rodriguez, Nancy, and Webb, Vincent J. 2005. Substance Abuse and Drug Courts: The Role of Social Bonds in Juvenile Drug Courts. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice 3 (4): 287–315.Google Scholar
Gottfredson, Denise. C., Kearley, Brook W., Najaka, Stacy S., and Rocha, Carlos M. 2007. How Drug Treatment Courts Work: An Analysis of Mediators. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 44 (1): 3–35.Google Scholar
Green, Beth L., Furrer, Carrie, Worcel, Sonia, Burrus, Scott, and Finigan, Michael W. 2007. How Effective Are Family Treatment Drug Courts? Outcomes from a Four‐Site National Study. Child Maltreatment 12 (1): 43–59.Google Scholar
Grella, Christine E., and Hall, Elizabeth 2010. Dependency Drug Courts: Evaluation of Cost Avoidance and Child Welfare Outcomes. Offender Programs Report 14 (4): 49–54.Google Scholar
Heyink, J. W., and Tymstra, T. J. 1993. The Function of Qualitative Research. Social Indicators Research 29:291–305.Google Scholar
Herzog, Sergio 2004. Plea Bargaining Practices: Less Covert, More Public Support? Crime and Delinquency 50 (4): 590–614.Google Scholar
Hora, Peggy F., Schma, William G., and Rosenthal, John T. A. 1999. Therapeutic Jurisprudence and the Drug Treatment Court Movement: Revolutionizing the Criminal Justice System's Response to Drug Abuse and Crime in America. Notre Dame Law Review 74 (2): 439–446.Google Scholar
Huddleston, C., Marlow, Douglas B., and Casebolt, Rachel 2008. Painting the Current Picture: A National Report Card on Drug Courts and Other Problem Solving Court Programs in the United States (Vol. 2, No. 1). Alexandria, VA: National Drug Court Institute.Google Scholar
Kupchik, Aaron 2003. Prosecuting Adolescents in Criminal Courts: Criminal or Juvenile Justice? Social Problems 50 (3): 439–460.Google Scholar
Latimer, Jeff, Morton‐Bourgon, Kelly, and Chretien, Jo‐Anne 2006. A Meta‐Analytic Examination of Drug Treatment Courts: Do They Reduce Recidivism? Ottawa, ON: Department of Justice.Google Scholar
Marlowe, Douglas, Festinger, David S., Dugosh, Karen L., Benasutti, Kathleen M., Fox, Gloria, and Croft, Jason R. 2012. Adaptive Programming Improves Outcomes in Drug Treatment Court: An Experimental Trial. Criminal Justice and Behavior 39 (4): 514–532.Google Scholar
Maryland Judiciary. 2006. Maryland District Courts Annual Report Highlights 2005–2006. Ocean City, MD: Maryland District Courts.Google Scholar
Mirchandani, Rakha 2005. What's So Special About Specialized Courts? The State and Social Change in Salt Lake City's Domestic Violence Court. Law and Society Review 39 (2): 379–417.Google Scholar
Moore, Dawn 2007. Translating Justice and Therapy: The Drug Treatment Court Movement. British Journal of Criminology 47 (1): 42–60.Google Scholar
Murphy, Kristina, and Tyler, Tom 2008. Procedural Justice and Compliance Behavior: The Mediating Role of Emotions. European Journal of Social Psychology 38 (4): 652–668.Google Scholar
Nolan, James L. 2001. Reinventing Justice: The American Drug Court Movement. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
–––, . 2002. Therapeutic Adjudication. Society 39 (2): 29–38.Google Scholar
O'Keefe, Kevin 2010. Two Wrongs Make a Wrong: A Challenge to Plea Bargaining and Collateral Consequence Statutes Through Their Integration. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 100 (1): 243–276.Google Scholar
Packer, Herbert L. 1968. The Limits of the Criminal Sanction. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Patton, William W. 1992. Child Abuse: The Irreconcilable Differences Between Criminal Prosecution and Informal Dependency Court Mediation. University of Louisville Journal of Family Law 31 (1): 37–64.Google Scholar
Picard‐Fritsche, Sarah, Bryan, Jennifer, Kralstein, Dana, and Farley, Erin 2011. The Bronx Family Treatment Court 2005–2010: Impact on Family Court Outcomes and Participant Experiences and Perceptions. New York: Center for Court Innovation.Google Scholar
Polakowski, Michael, Hartley, Roger E., and Bates, Leigh 2008. Treating Tough Cases in Juvenile Drug Court: Individual and Organizational Practices Leading to Success or Failure. Criminal Justice Review 33 (3): 379–404.Google Scholar
Poythress, Norman G., Petrila, John, McGaha, Annette, and Boothroyd, Roger 2002. Perceived Coercion and Procedural Justice in the Broward Mental Health Court. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 25:517–533.Google Scholar
Quinn, Mae C. 2000. Whose Team Am I on Anyway—Musing of a Public Defender About Drug Treatment Court Practice. New York University Review of Law and Social Change 26 (1): 37–76.Google Scholar
Ramirez, Suzanna 2006. Court Modeling: Assessing Family Treatment Court Orientation to Justice. Master's Thesis, Department of Sociology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.Google Scholar
Rossman, Shelli B., Roman, John K., Zweig, Janine M., Rempel, Michael, and Lindquist, Christine H. 2011. The Multi‐Site Adult Drug Court Evaluation: The Impact of Drug Courts, Vol. 4. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Justice Policy Center.Google Scholar
Rossman, Shelli B., Willison, Janeen B., Mallik‐Kane, Kamala, Kim, KiDeuk, Debus‐Sherrill, Sara, and Downey, Mitchell M. 2012. Criminal Justice Interventions for Offenders with Mental Illness: Evaluation of Mental Health Courts in Bronx and Brooklyn, New York. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
Rottman, David, and Casey, Pamela 1999. Therapeutic Jurisprudence and the Emergence of Problem‐Solving Courts. National Institute of Justice Journal 240:12–19.Google Scholar
Saltzburg, Stephen A. 1978. The Unnecessarily Expanding Role of the American Trial Judge. Virginia Law Review 64 (1): 1–81.Google Scholar
Snow, David 1999. Assessing Ways in Which Qualitative/Ethnographic Research Contributes to Social Psychology: Introduction to the Special Issue. Social Psychology Quarterly 62 (2): 97–100.Google Scholar
Tanenhous, David 2000. The Evolution of Transfer Out of the Juvenile Court. In The Changing Borders of Juvenile Justice, ed. Fagan, J. and Zimring, F. E., 13–43. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Tiger, Rebecca 2013. Judging Addicts: Drug Courts and Coercion in the Justice System. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Tourtellott, Janeanne E. 2008. FIRST Program in North Carolina Reuniting Families. Unified Family Court Connection (Spring): 3.Google Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. 2006. Why People Obey the Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
US Department of Justice. 2012. Drug Courts, Washington, DC: Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs. https://ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/236074.pdf (accessed February 5, 2013).Google Scholar
VanMeter, Sara 2004. Public Access to Juvenile Dependency Proceedings in Washington State: An Important Piece of the Permanency Puzzle. Seattle University Law Review 27:859–897.Google Scholar
Warner‐King, Kelly 2004. Family Treatment Court: Levels, Goals, Expectations and Requirements for Advancement. Seattle, WA: Family Treatment Court.Google Scholar
Wemmers, Jo‐Anne, and Cyr, Katie 2005. Can Mediation be Therapeutic for Crime Victims? An Evaluation of Victim's Experiences in Mediation with Young Offenders. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice 47 (3): 527–544.Google Scholar
Wexler, David B. 1996. Therapeutic Jurisprudence and Changing Conceptions of Legal Scholarship. In Law in a Therapeutic Key: Developments in Therapeutic Jurisprudence, ed. Wexler, D. B. and Winick, B. J., 24–55. Durham, NC: Carolina University Press.Google Scholar
Wolf, Robert V. 2000. Fixing Families: The Story of the Manhattan Family Treatment Court. Journal of the Center for Families, Children and the Courts 2:5–21.Google Scholar
Wren, Ginger L. 2010. Mental Health Courts: Serving Justice and Promoting Recovery. Annals of Health Law 19:577–593.Google Scholar