No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Study of the efficacy and safety of various pharmacotherapy regimens for atypical depression in the framework of bipolar affective disorder, recurrent depressive disorder, psychogenic depression
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 September 2022
Abstract
To improve the effectiveness of treatment for atypical depression, it is necessary to revise the accumulated experience, taking into account new knowledge and drugs.
Comparative study of the efficacy and safety of therapy for atypical depression (AtD) in the structure of bipolar affective disorder (BAD), recurrent depressive disorder (RDR) and psychogenic depression (PD).
Clinical and clinical follow-up methods examined 77 patients with AtD, of which 35 - with bipolar disorder, 18 - with RDR and 24 - with PD. Patients in all three groups received monotherapy with an antidepressant or a mood stabilizer, or a combination of antidepressant and antipsychotic, antidepressant and mood stabilizer, mood stabilizer and antipsychotic, as well as a combination of antidepressant, antipsychotic and mood stabilizer.
Agomelatine was the most frequently used (27.3%) and effective in reducing MADRS in all groups both in monotherapy and in combination with other drugs. Also in the PD group, escitalopram and vortioxetine were highly effective. Of the antipsychotics, when combined with antidepressants, sulpiride was found to be the most effective. When comparing the tolerance of antidepressants in all groups showed the best results (by the CGI scale), agomelatine and venlafaxine, in the BAR group is also vortioxetine.
The best strategy for effective and safe treatment of atypical depression is the use of modern antidepressant, which does not increase the symptoms of the atypical spectrum and, if necessary, can be supplemented with some antipsychotics.
No significant relationships.
Keywords
- Type
- Abstract
- Information
- European Psychiatry , Volume 65 , Special Issue S1: Abstracts of the 30th European Congress of Psychiatry , June 2022 , pp. S565 - S566
- Creative Commons
- This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Psychiatric Association
Comments
No Comments have been published for this article.