Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-04T02:56:15.892Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Antimicrobial stewardship and drug formulary restrictions during COVID-19: what is restricted and who decides?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 June 2023

Alfredo J. Mena Lora*
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
Rodrigo Burgos
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
Scott Borgetti
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
Lelia H. Chaisson
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
Susan C. Bleasdale
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
*
Corresponding author: Alfredo J. Mena Lora; Email: amenalor@uic.edu

Abstract

COVID-19 therapies were challenging to deploy due to evolving literature and conflicting guidelines. Antimicrobial stewardship can help optimize drug use. We conducted a survey to understand the role of stewardship and formulary restrictions during the pandemic. Restrictions for COVID-19 therapies were common and approval by infectious disease physicians often required.

Type
Concise Communication
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic presented a major challenge to healthcare systems worldwide. Throughout the pandemic, novel and repurposed drugs were used for the management of COVID-19. 1,2 Significant disagreements emerged over optimal treatment for hospitalized patients with COVID-19 due to conflicting guidelines and rapidly evolving literature. 1,2 Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) help optimize drug use by developing hospital guidelines, providing education, offering real-time feedback on prescribing practices, and implementing drug formulary restrictions. Reference Pierce and Stevens3 Thus, ASPs are uniquely positioned to support pandemic preparedness and response when novel treatments emerge. Reference Pierce and Stevens3,Reference Barlam, Al Mohajer and Al-Tawfiq4

Drug formulary restrictions are an important stewardship strategy that have been used to ensure that antimicrobials and COVID-19 therapies are used in accordance with the latest evidence and guidelines. Reference Pierce and Stevens3,Reference Becker, Seelye, Chua, Echevarria, Conti and Prescott5 However, there is a paucity of data on the role of ASP and formulary restrictions for COVID-19 therapeutics. In this study, we sought to understand and describe the role of stewardship and drug formulary restrictions in US hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

Study design and participants

We conducted a cross-sectional survey to assess the role of drug formulary restrictions at US hospitals. A web-based survey was developed in REDCap to capture data on characteristics of survey respondents, hospitals represented, and formulary restrictions for commonly used therapies for hospitalized patients with COVID-19 requiring supplemental oxygen and noninvasive or invasive ventilation (Supplement 2). Remdesivir, convalescent plasma, and IL-6 and JAK-2 inhibitors were included in our survey. Hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin were excluded due to lack of emergency use authorization by the FDA. Treatments for nonhospitalized patients, such as monoclonal antibodies and oral antivirals, were excluded. On April 22 and 25, 2022, we recruited participants by distributing a survey via online messaging boards and listservs for members of the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) IDea network, IDSA Antimicrobial Stewardship Centers for Excellence, and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology. The survey evaluated restrictions throughout the pandemic and remained open through May 15, 2022. Participants submitted responses anonymously.

Analysis

We assessed characteristics of survey respondents and respondents’ hospitals, the proportion of hospitals with formulary restrictions in place at any time during the COVID-19 pandemic, and specialties of providers authorized to place orders. In addition, we compared characteristics of drug formulary restrictions in hospitals where infectious diseases (IDs) physicians were authorized to place orders versus those where non-ID providers were authorized.

Ethics approval

The University of Illinois at Chicago Institutional Review Board approved this study.

Results

Survey respondents

A total of 99 survey responses were received, of which 4 hospitals outside the US were excluded. Of the 95 surveys included, 28 states and 44 cities were represented (Supplement 1). Survey respondents included 51 (54%) ID physicians, 37 (39%) pharmacists, 2 (2%) hospitalists, and 5 (5%) infection preventionists. Characteristics of hospitals with and without stewardship are listed on Table 1.

Table 1. Hospital characteristics

Stewardship

All hospitals but one hospital had ASP (n = 94, 99%) and 91 (96%) had formulary restrictions for COVID-19 therapies. Hospitals reported formulary restrictions for IL-6 inhibitors (n = 77, 81%), JAK-2 inhibitors (n = 76, 80%), remdesivir (n = 53, 56%), and convalescent plasma (n = 41, 54%) (Fig. 1). Restricted medications could be ordered or approved by ID physicians (n = 77, 81%), pulmonary/critical care physicians (n = 43, 44%), pharmacists (n = 27, 28%), designated hospitalists (n = 12, 13%), and designated COVID-19 team of providers of any discipline (n = 16, 17%) in hospitals with formulary restrictions. Hospitals where restricted medications could only be ordered or approved by ID physicians had more drug formulary restrictions (Fig. 1). Hospitals where ID physicians were not involved in the ordering or approval of restricted medications (n = 18, 19%) reported less formulary restrictions for IL-6 inhibitors (n = 7, 39%), JAK-2 inhibitors (n = 6, 33%), remdesivir (n = 6, 33%), and convalescent plasma (n = 7, 39%) (Fig. 1).

Figure 1. Restricted COVID-19 therapies by medication type (%) in all facilities and facilities with or without ID physicians ordering or approving restricted medications.

Conclusion

In our survey, formulary restrictions for COVID-19 therapeutics were commonly reported (n = 94, 96%) and approval by ID clinicians was commonly necessary (n = 77, 81%). The role of other specialties was significantly lower, with pulmonary/critical care as a distant second (n = 43, 44%). Though restrictions were present for most therapies, they were more commonly used for immunomodulators. Hospitals where ID physicians did not order or approve restricted medications had more unrestricted use of these medications. In smaller hospitals, this may reflect lack of access to ID physicians. Formulary restrictions may be a crucial tool for pandemic response in that they ensure access to medications to those who need them when availability is limited. A wider gap between remdesivir use and guideline concordance in hospitals without formulary restrictions has been reported. Reference Mena Lora, Burgos, Borgetti, Chaisson and Bleasdale6 Our survey highlights the value of ID clinicians to healthcare systems in allocating resources and promoting evidence-based practices during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Several obstacles made it challenging to bring novel COVID-19 therapies to the bedside. Rapidly evolving literature and conflicting guidelines often led to differences in the management of COVID-19. 1,2 ASP can help standardize therapy, inform clinicians of changing guidelines and novel therapies, and align treatments with evidence-based guidelines. Reference Pierce and Stevens3,Reference Barlam, Al Mohajer and Al-Tawfiq4 Supply constraints and cost also make stewardship imperative. During the initial months of the pandemic, there was high demand for remdesivir and limited supply. 7 Similarly, tocilizumab was in short supply at various points of the pandemic due to very high demand. 8 High cost and demand at a time when healthcare systems are under financial pressure by other aspects of the pandemic, such as decreased revenue and rising staffing costs, make stewardship a crucial part of pandemic response. Reference Berlin, Lapointe, Murphy and Wexler9 Remdesivir, for example, costs approximately $520 per vial, totaling over $2,000 per course. Reference Wang, Levi, Ellis and Hill10 Similarly, tocilizumab and baricitinib cost approximately $3,625 and $2,326, respectively, when used for COVID-19. Reference Wang, Levi, Ellis and Hill10 Thus, stewardship is vital to ensure the evidence-based use of pharmaceuticals that may be both expensive and in limited supply. The high cost and supply constraints of immunomodulators may be contributing factors to why these agents were more commonly restricted.

ID physicians have been at the frontlines of pandemic preparedness and response, often taking on multiple roles. These roles include providing clinical care, conducting clinical research, providing advice on infection prevention and control, influencing public policy, educating the public, and creating treatment protocols and management plans for COVID-19 patients. Our survey highlights the contribution of ID physicians in the stewardship of expensive and at times limited supply of medications. At a time with rampant disinformation and significant therapeutic controversies, ASP and ID physicians have been instrumental in ensuring that these medications are used appropriately, based on clinical guidelines and in accordance with the principles of stewardship. Indeed, the pandemic has further highlighted the value of ID physicians and of collaborative multidisciplinary stewardship teams.

Our study has several limitations. Our convenience sample was small, and ID physicians and pharmacists may have been more likely to participate due to our use of ID society listservs. Our survey did not capture specific hospital guidelines or timing of the formulary restrictions. Nonetheless, our study offers important knowledge on stewardship strategies and ID physician roles ring the COVID-19 pandemic.

Emerging and re-emerging infections will continue to pose challenges for clinicians. Lessons learned during the COVID-19 pandemic may help us prepare for future challenges. In this survey, we found that ASP and drug formulary restrictions were a common strategy during the COVID-19 pandemic. The important role played by ASP and ID physicians in the stewardship of expensive medications during the COVID-19 pandemic highlights the value of ID in yet another critical area of pandemic response.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2023.205

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank our subjects.

Author contribution

Alfredo J Mena Lora MD and Susan C Bleasdale MD contributed to the design of the study. All authors contributed to the project and manuscript. This project was presented at IDWeek 2022.

Financial support

This project received no financial support.

Competing interests

The authors have no conflict of interest to report.

References

National Institutes of Health. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) treatment guidelines. https://covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/. Accessed January 20, 2023.Google Scholar
Health Organization W. Guideline Therapeutics and COVID-19: Living Guideline; 2023. http://apps.who.int/bookorders Google Scholar
Pierce, J, Stevens, MP. COVID-19 and antimicrobial stewardship: lessons learned, best practices, and future implications. Int J Infect Dis 2021;113:103108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2021.10.001 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barlam, TF, Al Mohajer, M, Al-Tawfiq, JA, et al. SHEA statement on antibiotic stewardship in hospitals during public health emergencies. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2022;43:15411552. https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2022.194 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Becker, NV, Seelye, S, Chua, KP, Echevarria, K, Conti, RM, Prescott, HC. Dispensing of Ivermectin from veterans administration pharmacies during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Netw Open 2023;6:e2254859. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.54859 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mena Lora, AJ, Burgos, R, Borgetti, S, Chaisson, LH, Bleasdale, SC. Remdesivir use and antimicrobial stewardship restrictions during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in the United States: a cross-sectional survey. Antimicrob Stewardship Healthcare Epidemiol 2023;3:e63. https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2023.146 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American Hospital Association. Remdesivir to be sold to hospitals, allocated through existing federal mechanism, 2020. https://www.aha.org/special-bulletin/2020-06-30-remdesivir-be-sold-hospitals-allocated-through-existing-federal. Published 2020. Accessed January 24, 2023.Google Scholar
COVID-19 use causes Tocilizumab shortage. Cancer Discov 2021;11:29502950. https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.CD-NB2021-0386 Google Scholar
Berlin, G, Lapointe, M, Murphy, M, Wexler, J. Assessing the Lingering Impact of COVID-19 on the Nursing Workforce; 2022. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/healthcare/our-insights/assessing-the-lingering-impact-of-covid-19-on-the-nursing-workforce. Accessed January 24, 2023.Google Scholar
Wang, J, Levi, J, Ellis, L, Hill, A. Minimum manufacturing costs, national prices, and estimated global availability of new repurposed therapies for coronavirus disease 2019. Open Forum Infect Dis 2022;9. https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab581 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Hospital characteristics

Figure 1

Figure 1. Restricted COVID-19 therapies by medication type (%) in all facilities and facilities with or without ID physicians ordering or approving restricted medications.

Supplementary material: File

Mena Lora et al. supplementary material

Mena Lora et al. supplementary material 1

Download Mena Lora et al. supplementary material(File)
File 321.1 KB
Supplementary material: File

Mena Lora et al. supplementary material

Mena Lora et al. supplementary material 2

Download Mena Lora et al. supplementary material(File)
File 200.4 KB