Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-rvbq7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T06:02:16.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 5 - Preference Reversals, Delay Discounting, Rational Choice, and the Brain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2018

José Luis Bermúdez
Affiliation:
Texas A & M University
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Addis, D. R., Sacchetti, D. C., Ally, B. A., Budson, A. E., and Schacter, D. L.. 2009. Episodic simulation of future events is impaired in mild Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychologia 47:2660–71.Google Scholar
Ainslie, G. 1992. Picoeconomics: The strategic interaction of successive motivational states within the person. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Allais, M. 1953. Le comportement de l’homme rationnel devant le risque: critique des postulats et axiomes de l’Ecole Americaine. Econometrica 21:503–46.Google Scholar
Bermúdez, J. L. 2018. Frames, rationality, and self-control. In Self-Control, Decision Theory, and Rationality, ed. Bermúdez, J. L. (pp. 179203). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bickel, W. K., Odum, A. L., and Madden, G. J.. 1999. Impulsivity and cigarette smoking: delay discounting in current, never, and ex-smokers. Psychopharmacology 146:447–54.Google Scholar
Boyer, P. 2008. Evolutionary economics of mental time travel? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12:219–24.Google Scholar
Chapman, G. B. 1996. Temporal discounting and utility for health and money. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 22:771–91.Google ScholarPubMed
Cornford, F. M., trans. 1971. The Republic of Plato. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Craver, C., Cova, F., Green, L., et al. 2014. An Allais paradox without mental time travel. Hippocampus 24:1375–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Du, W., Green, L., and Myerson, J.. 2002. Cross-cultural comparisons of discounting delayed and probabilistic rewards. Psychological Record 52:479–92.Google Scholar
Estle, S. J., Green, L., Myerson, J., and Holt, D. D., 2006. Differential effects of amount on temporal and probability discounting of gains and losses. Memory & Cognition 34:914–28.Google Scholar
Estle, S. J., Green, L., Myerson, J., and Holt, D. D.. 2007. Discounting of monetary and directly consumable rewards. Psychological Science 18:5863.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, L., Fry, A., and Myerson, J.. 1994. Discounting of delayed rewards: a life-span comparison. Psychological Science 5:33.Google Scholar
Green, L., and Myerson, J.. 1993. Alternative frameworks for the analysis of self control. Behavior and Philosophy 21:3747.Google Scholar
Green, L., and Myerson, J.. 1996. Exponential versus hyperbolic discounting of delayed outcomes: risk and waiting time. American Zoologist 36:496505.Google Scholar
Green, L., and Myerson, J.2004. A discounting framework for choice with delayed and probabilistic rewards. Psychological Bulletin 130:769–92.Google Scholar
Green, L., and Myerson, J.. 2010. Experimental and correlational analyses of delay and probability discounting. In Impulsivity: The Behavioral and Neurological Science of Discounting, ed. Madden, G. J. and Bickel, W. K. (pp. 6792). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Green, L., and Myerson, J.. 2013. How many impulsivities? A discounting perspective. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 99:313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, L., Fry, A. F., and Myerson, J.. 1994. Discounting of delayed rewards: a life-span comparison. Psychological Science 5:3336.Google Scholar
Green, L., Myerson, J., and McFadden, E.. 1997. Rate of temporal discounting decreases with amount of reward. Memory & Cognition 25:715–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, L., Myerson, J., Oliveira, L., and Chang, S. E.. 2014. Discounting of delayed and probabilistic losses over a wide range of amounts. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 101:186200.Google Scholar
Herrnstein, R. J. 1970. On the law of effect. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 13:243–66.Google Scholar
Hofmann, W., Baumeister, R. F., Fӧrster, G., and Vohs, K, D.2012. Everyday temptations: an experience sampling study of desire, conflict, and self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 102L:1318–35.Google Scholar
Holt, D. D., Green, L., Myerson, J., and Estle, S. J.. 2008. Preference reversals with losses. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 15:8995.Google Scholar
Huskinson, S. L., Myerson, J., Green, L., et al. 2016. Shallow discounting of delayed cocaine by male rhesus monkeys when immediate food is the choice alternative. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology 24:456–63.Google Scholar
Huskinson, S. L., Woolverton, W. L., Green, L., Myerson, J., and Freeman, K. B.. 2015. Delay discounting of food by rhesus monkeys: cocaine and food choice in isomorphic and allomorphic situations. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology 23:184–93.Google Scholar
Jimura, K., Myerson, J., Hilgard, J., Braver, T. S., and Green, L.. 2009. Are people really more patient than other animals? Evidence from human discounting of real liquid rewards. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 16:1071–75.Google Scholar
Jimura, K., Myerson, J., Hilgard, J., et al. 2011. Domain independence and stability in young and older adults’ discounting of delayed rewards. Behavioural Processes 87:253–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A.. 1979. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47:263–91.Google Scholar
Keough, K. A., Zimbardo, P. G., and Boyd, J. N.. 1999. Who’s smoking, drinking, and using drugs? Time perspective as a predictor of substance use. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 21:149–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirby, K. N. 1997. Bidding on the future: evidence against normative discounting of delayed rewards. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 126:5470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirby, K. N., Winston, G. C., and Santiesteban, M.. 2005. Impatience and grades: delay-discount rates correlate negatively with college GPA. Learning and Individual Differences 15:213–22.Google Scholar
Kwan, D., Craver, C. F., Green, L., Myerson, J., and Rosenbaum, R. S.. 2013. Dissociations in future thinking following hippocampal damage: evidence from discounting and time perspective in episodic amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 142:1355–69.Google Scholar
Kwan, D., Craver, C. F., Green, L., et al. 2012. Future decision-making without episodic mental time travel. Hippocampus 22:1215–19.Google Scholar
Lee, W. 1953. Junkie: Confessions of an Unredeemed Drug Addict. New York, NY: Ace Books.Google Scholar
Loomes, G., and Sugden, R.. 1982. Regret theory: an alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty. Economic Journal 92:805–24.Google Scholar
Luhmann, C. C. 2009. Temporal decision-making: insights from cognitive neuroscience. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience 3:19.Google Scholar
Luhmann, C. C., Chun, M., Yi, D. Y., Lee, D., and Wang, X. J.. 2008. Neural dissociation between delay and uncertainty intertemporal choice. Journal of Neuroscience 28:14459–66.Google Scholar
MacCrimmon, K. R., and Larsson, S.. 1979. Utility theory: axioms versus “paradoxes.” In Expected Utility and the Allais Paradox, ed. Allais, M. and Hagen, O. (pp. 333409). Boston, MA: Reidel.Google Scholar
MacKillop, J., Miranda, R. Jr, Monti, P. M., et al. 2010. Alcohol demand, delayed reward discounting, and craving in relation to drinking and alcohol use disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 119:106–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacKillop, J., Weafer, J., Gray, J. C., et al. 2016. The latent structure of impulsivity: impulsive choice, impulsive action, and impulsive personality traits. Psychopharmacology 233:3361–70.Google Scholar
Madden, G. J., Petry, N. M., Badger, G. J., and Bickel, W. K.. 1997. Impulsive and self-control choices in opioid-dependent patients and non-drug-using control participants: drug and monetary rewards. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology 5:256–62.Google Scholar
Manwaring, J. L., Green, L., Myerson, J., Strube, M. J., and Wilfley, D. E.. 2011. Discounting of various types of rewards by women with and without binge eating disorder: evidence for general rather than specific differences. Psychological Record 61:561–82.Google Scholar
Mazur, J. E. 1987. An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement. In Quantitative Analyses of Behavior, vol. 5: The Effect of Delay and of Intervening Events on Reinforcement Value, ed. Commons, M. L., Mazur, J. E., Nevin, J. A., and Rachlin, H. (pp. 5573). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
McClure, S. M., Laibson, D. I., Loewenstein, G., and Cohen, J. D.. 2004. Separate neural systems value immediate and delayed monetary rewards. Science 306:503–7.Google Scholar
McKeon, R., ed. 1941. The Basic Works of Aristotle. New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar
Mejía-Cruz, D., Green, L., Myerson, J., Morales-Chainé, S., and Nieto, J.. 2016. Delay and probability discounting by drug-dependent cocaine and marijuana users. Psychopharmacology 233:2705–14.Google Scholar
Mischel, W. 1966. Theory and research on the antecedents of self-imposed delay of reward. In Progress in Experimental Personality Research, ed. Maher, B. A., vol. 3 (pp. 85132). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, S. H. 2011. The genetic basis of delay discounting and its genetic relationship to alcohol dependence. Behavioural Processes 87:1017.Google Scholar
Muraven, M., and Baumeister, R. F.. 2000. Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: does self-control resemble a muscle? Psychological Bulletin 126:247–59.Google Scholar
Myerson, J., and Green, L.. 1995. Discounting of delayed rewards: models of individual choice. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 64:263–76.Google Scholar
Myerson, J., Green, L., van den Berk-Clark, C., and Grucza, R. A.. 2015. Male, but not female, alcohol-dependent African Americans discount delayed gains more steeply than propensity-score matched controls. Psychopharmacology 232:4493–503.Google Scholar
Oberlin, B. G., and Grahame, N. J.. 2009. High-alcohol preferring mice are more impulsive than low-alcohol preferring mice as measured in the delay discounting task. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 33:1294–303.Google Scholar
Odum, A. L. 2011. Delay discounting: I’m a k, you’re a k. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 96:427439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perkel, J. K., Bentzley, B. S., Andrzejewski, M. E., and Martinetti, M. P.. 2015. Delay discounting for sucrose in alcohol-preferring and nonpreferring rats using a sipper tube within-sessions task. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 39:232–38.Google Scholar
Petry, N. M., Bickel, W. K., and Arnett, M.. 1998. Shortened time horizons and insensitivity to future consequences in heroin addicts. Addiction 93:729–38.Google Scholar
Raineri, A., and Rachlin, H.. 1993. The effect of temporal constraints on the value of money and other commodities. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 94:7794.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, R. S., Gilboa, A., Levine, B., Winocur, G., and Moscovitch, M.. 2009. Amnesia as an impairment of detail generation and binding: evidence from personal, fictional, and semantic narratives in KC. Neuropsychologia 47: 2181–87.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, R. S., Köhler, S., Schacter, D. L., et al. 2005. The case of K.C.: contributions of a memory-impaired person to memory theory. Neuropsychologia 43:9891021.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, R. S., Stuss, D. T., Levine, B., and Tulving, E.. 2007. Theory of mind is independent of episodic memory. Science 318:1257.Google Scholar
Rothspan, S., and Read, S. J.. 1996. Present versus future time perspective and HIV risk among heterosexual college students. Health Psychology 15:131–34.Google Scholar
Shah, A. K., Mullainathan, S., and Shafir, E.. 2012. Some consequences of having too little. Science 338:682–85.Google Scholar
Snoek, A., Levy, N., and Kennett, J.. 2016. Strong-willed but not successful: the importance of strategies in recovery from addiction. Addictive Behaviors Reports 4:102–7.Google Scholar
Vanderveldt, A., Oliveira, L., and Green, L.. 2016. Delay discounting: pigeon, rat, human – does it matter? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning & Cognition 42:141–62.Google Scholar
Zimbardo, P., and Boyd, J.. 1999. Putting time in perspective: a valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77:1271–88.Google Scholar
Zimbardo, P. G., Keough, K. A., and Boyd, J. N.. 1997. Present time perspective as a predictor of risky driving. Personality and Individual Differences 23:1007–23.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×