Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T14:49:21.752Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

23 - Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights

Past, Present and Future

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Malcolm Langford
Affiliation:
Norwegian Centre for Human Rights, University of Oslo
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

After the adoption in 1948 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (‘UDHR’), which included a relatively full catalogue of human rights, the UN General Assembly instructed the Commission on Human Rights to commence the drafting of a single covenant on human rights. While the drafting of a treaty covering civil and political rights was completed in short time, disagreement over whether to include economic, social and cultural rights led the Economic and Social Council (‘ECOSOC’) to request guidance from the General Assembly. The General Assembly initially ordered the Commission to produce one covenant but later reversed its position due to mediocre drafting progress, further prompting from ECOSOC and opposition of some Western States to economic, social and cultural rights. In 1966, it approved the adoption of two Covenants: the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (‘ICCPR’) and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (the ‘Covenant’ or ‘ICESCR’), the latter lacking a complaints mechanism.

Two decades after this schism, the ‘renaissance’ of economic, social and cultural rights (‘ESC rights’) is partly attributable to the pioneering work of the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (‘the Committee’). Established in 1987, the Committee has developed a ‘jurisprudence’ through its general comments and State-specific concluding observations. This work has been influential and catalytic in helping develop the conceptual framework of economic, social and cultural rights.

Type
Chapter
Information
Social Rights Jurisprudence
Emerging Trends in International and Comparative Law
, pp. 477 - 516
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Craven, M., The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: A Perspective on Its Development (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995), pp. 16–20Google Scholar
Steiner, H. and Alston, P. (eds.), International Human Rights in Context: Law, Politics and Morals (New York: Oxford University Press, 1996) 260–263
Riedel, E. and Rothen, P. (eds.), The Human Right to Water (Berlin: Berliner Wissenschafts Verlag, 2006)
Alston, P., ‘The Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights’, in Alston, P., (ed.) The United Nations and Human Rights: A Critical Appraisal (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992) pp. 473–508, at p. 488Google Scholar
Alston, P. and Simma, B., ‘First Session of the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights’, American Journal of International Law, Vol. 81 (1987), pp. 747–756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgenthal, T., International Human Rights in a Nutshell, 2nd Ed. (St. Paul, MN: West Publishing, 1995), p. 46Google Scholar
Sepúlveda, M., The Nature of Obligations under the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2003), p. 41Google Scholar
Dowell-Jones, M., Contextualising the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Assessing the Economic Deficit (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2004)Google Scholar
Dennis, M. and Stewart, D., ‘Justiciability of Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights: Should There Be an International Complaints Mechanism to Adjudicate the Rights to Food, Water, Housing, and Health?American Journal of International Law, Vol. 98 (2004), pp. 462–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tully, S., ‘A Human Right to Access Water? A Critique of General Comment No. 15’, Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, Vol. 23, No. 1 (2005), pp. 35–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alston, P. and Quinn, G., ‘Nature and Scope of States Parties’ Obligations under the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights', Human Rights Quarterly, Vol. 9 No. 1 (1987), pp. 156–229, at 185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, R. E., ‘Measuring State Compliance with the Obligation to Devote the “Maximum Available Resources” to Realizing Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights’, Human Rights Quarterly, Vol. 16, No. 4 (1994), pp. 693–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maastricht Guidelines on Violations of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights’, January 22–26, 1997, reprinted in Human Rights Quarterly, Vol. 20, no. 3 (1998), pp. 691–704
Report of the International Law Commission on Its Twenty Ninth Session’, Yearbook of the International Law Commission, Vol. 2, pp. 20–21 (1977)
Dupuy, P. M., ‘Reviewing the Difficulties of Codification: On Ago's Classification of Obligations of Means and Obligations of Result in Relation to State Responsibility’, European Journal of International Law, Vol. 10, pp. 371–385 (1990), pp. 374–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basic Rights: Subsistence, Affluence and US Foreign Policy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1980)
Eide, A., ‘State obligations revisited’ in Eide, W.B. and Kracht, U. (eds.) Food and Human Rights in Development, Vol. II: Evolving issues and emerging applications (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2007), pp. 137–160Google Scholar
Mowbray, A., The Development of Positive Obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights by the European Court of Human Rights (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2004)Google Scholar
Reich, C., ‘The New Property’, Yale Law Journal, Vol. 73, (1963–64), pp. 732–787Google Scholar
Shue, H., ‘Rights in Light of Duties’, in Brown, P. and Maclean, D. (eds.), Human Rights and US Foreign Policy (Lexington: Lexington Books, 1979), pp. 65–82, at p. 76Google Scholar
Sunstein, C., Designing Democracy: What Constitutions Do (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003)Google Scholar
Sunstein, C., ‘Against Positive Rights’, in Sajó, A. (ed.) Western Rights? Post-Communist Application (The Hague: Kluwer, 1996), p. 225Google Scholar
Mitullah, W. and Kibwana, K., ‘A Tale of Two Cities: Policy, Law and Illegal Settlements in Kenya’, in Fernandes, E. and Varley, A. (eds.), Illegal Cities: Law and Urban Change in Developing Countries (London: Zed Books, 1998), pp. 191–212, at 207Google Scholar
Riedel, E., ‘New Bearings to the State Reporting Procedure’, in Schorlemer, S. (ed.), Praxishandbuch UNO (Berlin: Springer Verlag, 2003), pp. 345–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roaf, V., Khalfan, A. and Langford, M., Indicators for the Right to Water: Concept Paper (Berlin: Heinrich Boell Foundation, Bread for the World and Centre on Housing Rights and Evictions, 2005)Google Scholar
Vandenhole, W., Non-discrimination and Equality in the View of the UN Human Rights Treaty Bodies (Anterwepen-Oxford: Intersentia, 2005), p. 135Google Scholar
Alston, P., ‘Ships Passing in the Night: The Current State of the Human Rights and Development Debate Seen Through the Lens of the Millennium Development Goals’, Human Rights Quarterly, Vol. 27, No. 3 (2005), pp. 755–829, at 822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alston, P., ‘Out of the Abyss: The Challenges Confronting the New U. N. Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights’, Human Rights Quarterly, Vol. 9, No. 3 (1987), pp. 332–381, at 352–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eide, A., ‘Realization of Social and Economic Rights and the Minimum Threshold Approach’, Human Rights Law Journal, Vol. 10 (1989), pp. 35–51, at 43–47Google Scholar
Arambulo, K., Strengthening the Supervision of the International Convenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Theoretical and Practical Aspects (Antwerp: Intersentia, 1999), pp. 136–141Google Scholar
Alexy, R., Theory of Constitutional Rights (trans. Rivers, J.) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002) pp. 192–196Google Scholar
Chapman, A. and Russell, S., (eds.), Core Obligations: Building a Framework for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (Antwerp/Oxford: Intersentia, 2002)
Porter, B., ‘The Crisis of ESC Rights and Strategies for Addressing It’, in Squires, J., Langford, M., and Thiele, B. (eds.), Road to a Remedy: Current Issues in Litigation of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (Sydney: Australian Human Rights Centre and University of NSW Press, Sydney, 2005), pp. 48–55Google Scholar
Saith, A., ‘From Universal Values to Millennium Development Goals: Lost in Translation’, Development and Change, Vol. 37, No. 6 (2006), pp. 1167–1199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilchitz, D., Poverty and Fundamental Rights: The Justification and Enforcement of Socio-economic Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007)Google Scholar
King, J.A., ‘Constitutional Rights and Social Welfare: A Comment on the Canadian Chaoulli Health Care Decision’, Modern Law Review, Vol. 69, (2006) pp. 631–643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craven, M., ‘The Violence of Disposession: Extra-territoriality and Economic, Social and Cultural Rights’, in Baderin, M. and McCorquodale, R., Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in Action (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007), pp. 71–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Künnemann, R., ‘Extraterritorial Application of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights’, in Coomans, F. and Kamminga, M., (eds.), Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Treaties (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2004), pp. 201–231Google Scholar
Sepúlveda, M., ‘Obligations of “International Assistance and Cooperation” in an Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights’, Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, Vol. 24, (2006), pp. 271–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandenhole, W., ‘Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in the CRC: Is There a Legal Obligation to Cooperate Internationally for Development?’, International Journal for Children's Rights, Vol. 15, (2007) (forthcoming)Google Scholar
Ebnvenisti, E., ‘Margin of Appreciation, Consensus and Universal Standards’, International Law and Politics, Vol. 31 (1999), pp. 843–854Google Scholar
Robertson, R. E., ‘Measuring State Compliance with the Obligation to Devote the “Maximum Available Resources” to Realizing Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights’, Human Rights Quarterly, Vol. 16, No.4 (1994), pp. 693–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A., ‘Work and Rights’, International Labour Review, vol. 139, No. 2 (2000), pp. 119–128 at 120–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ciblis, A., ‘Argentina's IMF Agreement: The Dawn of a New Era?’, Foreign Policy in Focus, 10 October 2003Google Scholar
Leckie, S. in Langford, M., Litigating Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Achievements, Challenges and Strategies (Centre on Housing Rights & Evictions, 2003), pp. 161, 163Google Scholar
Leckie, S., ‘The Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: A Catalyst for Change in a System Needing Reform’, in Alston, P. and Crawford, J., The Future of the UN Human Rights Treaty Monitoring System (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000) p. 132Google Scholar
Scheinin, M., ‘The Right to Social Security’ in Eide, A., Krause, C. and Rosas, A. (eds.), Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2001), pp. 211–219Google Scholar
Vandenhole, W., ‘Article 26: The Right to Benefit from Social Security’, A Commentary on the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2007)Google Scholar
Duffy, K., Opportunity and Risk: Trends of Social Exclusion in Europe (Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 1998)Google Scholar
Langford, M., ‘The Right to Social Security and Implications for Law, Policy and Practice’, in Riedel, E. (ed.) Social Security as a Human Right: Drafting a General comment on Article 9 ICESCR – Some challenges (Berlin: SpringerVerlag, 2006), pp. 29–53Google Scholar
Müller, K., Privatising Old-Age Security: Latin America and Eastern Europe Compared (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2003)Google Scholar
Gilman, M., ‘Legal Accountability in an Era of Privatized WelfareCalifornia Law Review, Vol. 89 (2001) pp. 569–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, J.Extending Public Law Norms Through PrivatizationHarvard Law Review, Vol. 116 (2002–2003) pp. 1285–1352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, D.J., ‘Due Process in a Privatized Welfare SystemBrooklyn Law Review, Vol. 64 (1998), pp. 231–306Google Scholar
Freeman, J., ‘Private Parties, Public Functions and the New Administrative Law’, Administrative Law Review, Vol. 52 (2000) pp. 813–858Google Scholar
McCaffrey, S., ‘A Human Right to Water: Domestic and International Implications’ (1992) 5 Georgetown International Environmental Law Review1, 1–24Google Scholar
Gleick, P., ‘The Human Right to Water’, (1999) 1 Water Policy487, 478–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smets, H., ‘Le Droit de chacun a l'eauRevue europeene de droit de l'environnement Vol. 2 (2002), pp. 123–170Google Scholar
Vidar, M. and Mekouar, M., Water, Health and Human Rights (2001)
Salman, S. and McInerney-Lankford, S., The Human Right to Water: Legal and Policy Dimensions (Washington D.C.: World Bank 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCaffrey, S., ‘The Human Right to Water’ in Weiss, E. Brown, Charzounes, L. Boisson and Bernasconi-Osterwalder, N. (eds.), Fresh Water and International Economic Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2005)Google Scholar
Kiefer, T. and Brolmann, C., ‘Beyond State Sovereignty: The Human Right to Water’ (2005) 5 Non-State Actors and International Law Vol. 5 (2005) pp. 183–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cahill, A., ‘The Human Right to Water – A Right of Unique Status: The Legal Status and Normative Content of the Right to Water’ (2005) 9International Journal of Human Rights389, 389–410Google Scholar
Tully, S., ‘A Human Right to Access Water? A Critique of General Comment No. 15’, Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, Vol. 23 (2005), pp. 35–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langford, M., ‘Ambition that overleaps itself? A Response to Stephen Tully's ‘Critique’ of the General Comment on the Right to Water’, Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights Vol. 26 (2006) pp. 433–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tully, S., ‘Flighty Purposes and Deeds: a Rejoinder to Malcolm Langford’ (2006) 26 Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights461, 461–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langford, M., ‘Expectation of Plenty: response to Stephen Tully’ (2006) 26 Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights473, 473–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langford, M., Khalfan, A., Fairstein, C. and Jones, H., The Right to Water: National and International Standards (Geneva: Centre on Housing Rights & Evictions, 2003)Google Scholar
Gleick, P., ‘Basic water requirements for human activities: meeting basic needs’, Water International Vol. 24 (1996), 83–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westerveen, G., ‘Towards a System for Supervising States’ Compliance with the Right to Food', in Alston, P., and Tomaševski, K., The Right to Food (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1984), pp. 119–134, at 127Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×