Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Language Learning
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Language Learning
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I Theories
- Part II Methods
- 5 Qualitative Classroom Methods
- 6 Experimental Studies in L2 Classrooms
- 7 Action Research: Developments, Characteristics, and Future Directions
- 8 Classroom Observation Research
- 9 Psycholinguistic and Neurolinguistic Methods
- Part III Skill Development
- Part IV Individual Differences
- Part V Pedagogical Interventions and Approaches
- Part VI Context and Environment
- Part VII Moving Forward
- Index
- References
7 - Action Research: Developments, Characteristics, and Future Directions
from Part II - Methods
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 June 2019
By
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Language Learning
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Language Learning
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I Theories
- Part II Methods
- 5 Qualitative Classroom Methods
- 6 Experimental Studies in L2 Classrooms
- 7 Action Research: Developments, Characteristics, and Future Directions
- 8 Classroom Observation Research
- 9 Psycholinguistic and Neurolinguistic Methods
- Part III Skill Development
- Part IV Individual Differences
- Part V Pedagogical Interventions and Approaches
- Part VI Context and Environment
- Part VII Moving Forward
- Index
- References
Summary
Action research has become increasingly prevalent in the field of English language teaching over the last two decades. It can be considered as a form of professional learning for language teachers which takes a socio-constructivist approach in which teachers are seen as agentive actors and investigators within their own social contexts. This chapter begins by providing a brief overview of the origins of action research and its development in the field of English language teaching, considering also some of the more recent initiatives that have contributed to the spread of this form of research in the field. It then discusses what various recent studies have shown about the impact on teachers of conducting action research. The discussion ends with a brief consideration of future directions for this research.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Language Learning , pp. 166 - 185Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Alexander, L., & Onslow-Mato, W. (2015). Students as active protagonists in the reading process: Developing tasks for critical reading in the EAP classroom. Research Notes, 60, 30–37.Google Scholar
Allison, D., & Carey, J. (2007). What do university language teachers say about language teaching research? Canada Journal/Revue TESL du Canada, 24(2), 61–81.Google Scholar
Allwright, D. (1997). Quality and sustainability in teacher-research. TESOL Quarterly, 31(2), 368–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allwright, D., & Bailey, K. (1991). Focus on the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Al-Maskari, A. S. (2015). Suppporting teacher research through a practical in-service course. In Borg, S. & Santiago-Sanchez, H. (eds.), International perspectives on teacher research (pp. 113–124). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Atay, D. (2008). Teacher research for professional development. ELT Journal, 62(2), 139–147.Google Scholar
Banegas, D. L. (2012). Identity of the teacher-researcher in collaborative action research: Concerns reflected in a research journal. PROFILE, Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 14(2), 29–43.Google Scholar
Banegas, D. L., Pavese, A., Velázquez, A., & Vélez, S. M. (2013). Teacher professional development through collaborative action research: Impact on foreign English-language teaching and learning. Educational Action Research, 21(2), 185–201.Google Scholar
Barkhuizen, G. (2017). Reflections on language teacher identity research. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Beasley, B., & Riordan, L. (1981). The classroom teacher as researcher. English in Australia, 55(1), 36–42.Google Scholar
Borg, S. (2013). Teacher research in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Borg, S. (2015). Professional development through the Cambridge English/English UK Action Research Scheme. Research Notes, 61, 3–5.Google Scholar
Borg, S., & Burns, A. (2008). TESOL research: What? How? Why? Pre-convention event, 2 April, 42nd Annual Convention, New York.Google Scholar
Borg, S., & Lui, Y. (2013). Chinese English college teachers’ engagement with research. TESOL Quarterly, 47(2), 270–299.Google Scholar
Breen, M., Candlin, C., Dam, L., & Gabrielsen, G. (1989). The evolution of a teacher training program. In Johnson, K. (ed.), The second language curriculum (pp. 111–135). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brumfit, C., & Mitchell, R. (1989). The language classroom as a focus for research. In Brumfit, C. & Mitchell, R. (eds.), Research in the language classroom (pp. 3–15). London: Modern English Publications and The British Council.Google Scholar
Burns, A. (1999). Collaborative action research for English language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Burns, A. (2000). Facilitating collaborative action research: Some insights from the AMEP. Prospect, 15(3), 23–34.Google Scholar
Burns, A. (2010). Doing action research in English language teaching: A guide for practitioners. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Burns, A. (2011). Action research in the field of second language teaching and learning. In Hinkel, E. (ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (Vol. 2, pp. 237–253). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Burns, A. (2016). From reluctant teacher to teacher educator: A “brilliant” career. In Ellis, R. (ed.), Being and becoming an applied linguist (pp. 301–330). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Burns, A. (2017). “This life-changing experience”: Teachers becoming action researchers. In Barkhuizen, G. (ed.), Reflections on language teacher identity research (pp. 133–138). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Burns, A., & Brandon, K. (2017). Action research in ELICOS. Impact and insights from a national teacher development program. In Burns, A. & Khalifa, H. (Eds.), Second language assessment and action research (pp. 315–327). SiLT Series. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Burns, A., Dikilitaş, K., Smith, R., & Wyatt, M. (eds.) (2017). Developing insights into teacher-research. Faversham: IATEFL. Retrieved from http://resig.weebly.com/uploads/2/6/3/6/26368747/burns_dikilitas_smith___wyatt_eds._2017.pdf.Google Scholar
Burns, A., & Kurtoglu-Hooton, M. (2016). Using action research to explore technology: International perspectives. London: The British Council.Google Scholar
Burns, A., & Khalifa, H. (eds.) (2017). Second language assessment and action research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Burns, A., & McPherson, P. (2017). Action research as iterative design: Implications for English language education research. In Mirhosseini, S.-A. (ed.), Reflections on qualitative research in language and literacy education (pp. 105–120). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Burns, A., Westmacott, A., & Hidalgo Ferrer, A. (2016). Initiating an action research programme for university EFL teachers: Early experiences and responses. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 4(3), 55–73.Google Scholar
Castellano, J., Mynard, J., & Rubesch, T. (2011). Action research: Student technology use in a self-access center. Language Learning and Technology, 15(3), 12–27.Google Scholar
Çelik, S., & Dikilitaş, K. (2015). Action research as a professional development strategy. In Borg, S. & Santiago Sanchez, H. (eds.), International perspectives on teacher research (pp. 125–138). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Corey, S. M. (1954). Action research in education. Journal of Educational Research, 47(5), 375–380,Google Scholar
Cárdenas, M. L. (2003). Teacher researchers as writers: A way to sharing findings. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 5(5), 49–64.Google Scholar
Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: Knowing through action research. Geelong: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
Castro Garcés, A. Y., & Martínez Granada, L. (2016). The role of collaborative action research in teachers’ professional development. PROFILE Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 18(1), 39–54.Google Scholar
Chan, C. (2016). School–university partnerships in English language teacher education. Tensions, complexities and the politics of collaboration. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Clark, M. A. (1994). The dysfunctions of the theory/practice discourse. TESOL Quarterly, 28(1), 9–26.Google Scholar
Crookes, G. (1993). Action research for English language teachers: Going beyond teacher research. Applied Linguistics, 14(2), 130–144.Google Scholar
Crookes, G., & Chandler, P. M. (2001). Introducing action research into the education of postsecondary foreign language teachers. Foreign Language Annals, 34(2), 131–140.Google Scholar
Dajani, M. (2015). Preparing Palestinian reflective English language teachers through classroom-based action research. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 116–139.Google Scholar
Dikilitaş, K., & Griffiths, C. (2017). Developing language teacher autonomy through action research. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Dikilitaş, K., & Mumford, S. E. (2016). Supporting the writing up of teacher research: peer and mentor roles. ELT Journal, 70(4), 371–381.Google Scholar
Dikilitaş, K., Smith, R., & Trotman, W. (eds.) (2015). Teacher-researchers in action. Faversham: IATEFL. Retrieved from http://resig.weebly.com/uploads/2/6/3/6/26368747/teacher-researchers_in_action.pdf.Google Scholar
Dikilitaş, K., Wyatt, M., Hanks, J., & Bullock, D. (eds.) (2016). Teachers engaging in research. Faversham: IATEFL. Downloadable from http://resig.weebly.com/uploads/2/6/3/6/26368747/teachers_engaging_in_research.pdf.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguitics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Edge, J., & Richards, K. (eds.) (1994). Teachers develop teachers research. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Edwards, E., & Burns, A. (2016a). Language teacher action research: Achieving sustainablity: ELT Journal, 70(1), 6–15.Google Scholar
Edwards, E., & Burns, A. (2016b). Language teacher-researcher identity negotiation: An ecological perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 50(3), 735–745.Google Scholar
Esposito, J., & Smith, S. (2006). From reluctant teacher to empowered teacher-researcher. One educator’s journey towards action research. Teacher Education Quarterly, 33(3), 45–60.Google Scholar
Fanselow, J. (1987). Breaking rules: Generating and exploring alternatives in language teaching. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Field, J., Graham, A., Griffiths, E., & Head, K. (eds.) (1997), Teachers develop teachers research 2. Whitstable: IATEFL.Google Scholar
Freeman, D., & Richards, J. C. (eds.) (1996). Teacher learning in language teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hei, K. C., & David, M. K. (2017). Empowering language teachers through action research: Two case studies from Malaysia. English Review: Journal of English Education, 5(2), 163–174.Google Scholar
Hine, G. S. C. (guest ed.) (2013). The importance of action research in teacher education programs [Special issue]. Issues in Educational Research, 23(2).Google Scholar
Kutlay, N. (2013). A survey of English language teachers’ views of research. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 188–206.Google Scholar
Lewin, K. (1948). Resolving social conflicts: Selected papers on group dynamics, ed. Lewin, G. W.. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Mangion, L., & Stokes, P. (2017). Using cloud computing to increase collaboration in developing writing skills. Research Notes, 67, 7–12,Google Scholar
McKay, S. (2006). Researching second language classrooms. Mahwah, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
McFarland, K. P., & Stansell, J. C. (1993). Historical perspectives. In Patterson, L., Santa, C. M., Short, C. G., & Smith, K. (eds.), Teachers are researchers: Reflection and action (pp. 12–18). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
Mathew, R., Eapen, R. L., & Tharu, J. (eds.) (2000). The language currriculum: Dynamics of change, Vol. 1. The outsider perspective. Report of the International Seminar 1995. Hyderabad: Orient Longman for the Central Institute for English and Foreign Language Studies.Google Scholar
McDonough, J., & McDonough, S. (1997). Research methods for language teachers. London, England: Arnold.Google Scholar
McDonough, K. (2006). Action research and the professional development of graduate teaching assistants. The Modern Language Journal, 90(1), 33–47.Google Scholar
McKay, S. L. (2009). Second language classroom research. In Burns, A. & Richards, J. C. (eds.), The Cambridge guide to second language teacher education (pp. 281–288). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mehrani, M. B. (2016). A narrative study of Iranian EFL teachers’ experiences of doing action research. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 5(1), 93–112.Google Scholar
MEST (2016). The National Curriculum Policy. Nairobi: Ministry of Education, Science and Technology.Google Scholar
Mok, A. (1997). Student empowerment in an English language enrichment programme: An action research project in Hong Kong. Educational Action Research, 5(2), 305–320.Google Scholar
NCTE (2009). National curriculum framework for teacher education. New Delhi: National Council for Teacher Education.Google Scholar
Negi, J. S. (2016). Improving teaching through action research; Perceptions, practices and problems (3Ps): Voices from secondary level teachers in an EFL context. ELT Voices, 6(4), 18–30.Google Scholar
NFL2020 (2014). Competency framework for English language teachers. Hanoi: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
Norton, B. (2000). Identity and language learning: Gender, ethnicity and educational change. Harlow: Longman and Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Nunan, D. C. (1987). The teacher as curriculum developer. Adelaide: National Curriculum Resource Centre.Google Scholar
Nunan, D. C. (1989). Understanding language classrooms. A guide for teacher-initiated action. Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
O’Brien, T., Newnham, G., & Tinker, L. (2000). Collaborative practice-based research in supporting the language development of primary level bilingual children: A case study. Educational Action Research, 8(1), 43–64.Google Scholar
Paltridge, B., & Phakiti, A. (eds.) (2015). Research methods in applied linguistics. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Perrett, G. (2003). Teacher development through action research: A case study in focused action research. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 27(2), 1–10.Google Scholar
Pickering, G., & Gunashekar, P. (eds.) (2015). Innovation in language teacher education. London: The British Council.Google Scholar
Rainey, I. (2000). Action research and the English as a foreign language practitioner: Time to take stock. Educational Action Research, 8(1), 65–91.Google Scholar
Rajuan, M. (2015). Practice and principles of pre-service action research. In Borg, S. & Santiago-Sanchez, H. (eds.), International perspectives on teacher research (pp. 139–151). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Rebolledo, P., Smith, R., & Bullock, D. (eds.) (n.d.). Champion teachers: Stories of exploratory action research. London: The British Council.Google Scholar
Richards, J. C., & Lockhart, C. (1994). Reflective teaching in second language classrooms. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Richards, K., Ross, S., & Seedhouse, P. (2012). Research methods for applied language studies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Roberts, J. (1986). Action research: An introduction. Teacher Development SIG Newsletter, No. 4. Faversham: IATEFL.Google Scholar
Somekh, B., & Zeichner, K. (2009). Action research for educational reform: Remodelling action research theories and practices in local contexts. Educational Action Research, 17(1), 5–21.Google Scholar
Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
TESOL (2004). TESOL 2004 Annual Report. Alexandria, VA: TESOL International. Retrieved from http://www.tesol.org/docs/annual-reports/arp2004.pdf?sfvrsn=4.Google Scholar
Tinker Sachs, G. (ed.) (2002), Action research in English language teaching. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Tran, A., Burns, A., & Ollerhead, S. (2017). ELT lecturers’ experiences of a new research policy: Exploring emotion and academic identity, System, 67, 65–76.Google Scholar
Trent, J. (2010). Teacher education as identity construction: Insights from action research. Journal of Education for Teaching: International Research and Pedagogy, 36(2), 153–168.Google Scholar
Viera, F. (2003). Addressing constraints on autonomy in school contexts: Lessons from working with teachers. In Palfreyman, D. & Smith, R. C. (eds.), Learner autonomy across cultures: Language education perspectives (pp. 220–239). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Vilches, J. U. (2007). Teacher autonomy: A critical review of the research and concept beyond applied linguistics. Í kala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, 12(18), 245–275.Google Scholar
Wallace, M. (1991). Training foreign language teachers: A reflective approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wang, Q., & Zhang, H. (2014). Promoting teacher autonomy through university–school collaborative research. Language Teaching Research, 18(2), 222–241.Google Scholar
Wyatt, M. (2010). Teachers researching their own practice. ELT Journal, 65(4), 417–425.Google Scholar
Wyatt, M., Burns, A., & Hanks, J. (2016). Teacher practitioner research: Reflections on an online discussion. TESL-EJ, 20(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
Xie, J. (2015). Learning to do teacher research independently: Challenges and solutions. In Borg, S. & Santiago Sanchez, H. (eds.), International perspectives on teacher research (pp. 47–56). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Xu, Y. (2014). Becoming researchers: A narrative study of Chinese university EFL teachers’ research practice and their professional identity construction. Language Teaching Research, 18(2), 242–259.Google Scholar
Yoshida, T., & Kambara, K. (2014). EFL teachers’ conceptual development and the transformation of teaching through narratives in the E-portfolio. In Said, B. S. & Zhang, L. (eds.), Language teachers and teaching: Global perspectives, local initiatives (pp. 219–236). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Yuan, R. E., & Lee, I. (2015). Action research facilitated by university–school collaboration. ELT Journal, 69(1),1–10.Google Scholar
Yuan, R. E., & Burns, A. (2016). Teacher identity development through action research: A Chinese experience. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 23(6), 729–749.Google Scholar
Yucel, M., & Bos, V. (2015). Action research as a means of stepping out of the teaching comfort zone. In Borg, S. & Santiago Sanchez, H. (eds.), International perspectives on teacher research (pp. 29–46). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Yucel, B., & Gűndoğdu, M. A. (2017). Mentoring teachers as researchers. In Burns, A., Dikilitaş, K., Smith, R., & Wyatt, M. (eds.), Developing insights into teacher research (p. 29–38). Faversham: IATEFL.Google Scholar
- 12
- Cited by