Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-29T12:22:45.585Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Life History and the Anatomy of the Early Stages of Forcipomyia (Diptera, Nemat., Ceratopogoninae)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Leslie G. Saunders
Leslie G. Saunders
Affiliation:
(From the Molteno Institute for Research in Parasitology, University of Cambridge.)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

(1) Forcipomyia is one of the few genera of the Ceratopogoninae (Chironomidae) whose larvae are not aquatic. They retain, however, the apneustic condition typical of the entire family, and are therefore compelled to live in moist places such as beneath the rotting bark of fallen trees, in the hollow tap roots of dead plants, in wounds and rot holes in trees, in drying horse and cow manure, in decaying fungi, and in the nests of ants. The immature forms are strongly gregarious.

(2) The larvae pass through four stages, each lasting about a week; the successive changes in chaetotaxy at each moult is recorded in the discussion of F. picea. All known European species of this genus hibernate as third or fourth stage larvae. The duration of the pupal stage is about one week; the length of life of the adult has not been determined. There are usually three generations per annum. The adults are known to suck the blood of other insects.

(3) The larvae are eucephalous, more or less cylindrical, 3–6 mm. long, with eleven clearly denned segments (three thoracic and eight abdominal, the eighth divided into two apparent segments). Progression is achieved by means of a retractable, biramous, prothoracic pseudopod, and a ventral hook-studded ridge on the ultimate abdominal segment, with the occasional aid of the mandibles.

(4) The head and body bear numerous lanceolate and simple hairs of great specific importance.

(5) The mouth-parts consist of a fleshy labrum, a pair of small premandibles, a pair of long, slender mandibles working in the sagittal plane on either side of the labrum, a pair of reduced maxillae of fleshy nature with chitinous internal supports, and a simple untoothed labium. Within the head there is a complicated chitinous structure, the hypopharynx; this is figured and described in full detail and its action in comminuting the food is revealed for the first time.

(6) No investigation has hitherto been made of the internal anatomy. The alimentary canal, consisting of buccal cavity, hypopharynx, oesophagus, mid-gut, and hind-gut, is quite simple in structure, without nodules or caecal chambers. It is only slightly longer than the body, a loop occurring in the hind-gut when the larva contracts.

(7) The malpighian tubules are either two or three in number, the latter condition being unique among insects. The third is ventral, passing into the posterior part of the body only.

(8) The salivary glands are a pair of S-shaped bodies closely adhering to the walls of the anterior portion of the mid-gut; they are chiefly composed of large binucleate cells.

(9) The circulatory system consists of a dorsal vessel extending throughout the body and passing between the lobes of the brain above the oesophagus into the head. In the eighth abdominal segment it enlarges slightly to form the heart, with one pair of ostia or valves situated on its posterior extremity.

(10) The nephrocytes are arranged segmentally, four to each abdominal segment and a single mass in the thorax, all attached to the dorsal vessel. The excretory function of these cells was demonstrated by injection of ammonia-carmine into the body cavity.

(11) The nervous system is only very slightly cephalised, there being seven ganglia for the eight abdominal segments and three in the thorax; the normal bilobed brain is situated in the thorax in all larval stages. The sympathetic system is described, and differs somewhat from that of its close relative, Chironomus.

(12) Despite the absence of spiracles there is a well-developed tracheal system in the form of two main trunks with transverse connections, branch tracheae, and subcutaneous plexuses.

(13) The muscular system, oenocytes, fat-body, and gonads have also been studied in detail.

(14) The larval skin is retained upon the last four or five abdominal segments of the pupa.

(15) The characters used for determining the species, in their order of importance, are as follows: Larva: chaetotaxy, prothoracic pseudopod, markings of the head, anal blood-gills. Pupa: cuticular spines, prothoracic horns.

(16) The larvae and pupae of nine species of Forcipomyia are described with particular reference to their specific characters. Descriptions of the adults of two new species, F. radidcola and F. pulchrithorax, by Mr F. W. Edwards, are appended.

(17) Closely related forms are Euforcipomyia and other exotic subgenera not yet named, and the genus Atrichopogon (now including Kempia). Dasyhelea belongs to this group of hairy-winged flies, but its larvae partly resemble those of the bare-winged Ceratopogonines in that they have lost the pro-thoracic pseudopod and macrochaetae, but retain the anal hooks.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 16 , Issue 2 , March 1924 , pp. 164 - 213
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1924

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Berlese, A. (1909). Gli Insetti, I. Milan.Google Scholar
Bouché, (1834). Naturgeschichte der Insekten, I. Berlin.Google Scholar
Brauer, Fr. (1883). Die Zweiflüger des Kaiserlichen Museums zu Wien, III. Denkschr. Akad. Wiss. Wien, xlvii.Google Scholar
Bruntz, L. (1903). Contributions à l'étude de l'excrétion chez les Arthropods. Arch. de Biol. xx. 217–422, Pls. VII–IX.Google Scholar
Carter, H. F. (1919). New West African Ceratopogoninae. Ann. Trap. Med. and Parasit. xii. 289–302.Google Scholar
DeGeer, C. (1781). Mémoires pour servir à l'histoire des Insectes, vi.Google Scholar
Donisthorpe, H. (1919). Myrmecophilous Notes. Ent. Record, xxxi. 25.Google Scholar
Dufour, L. (1845). Sur les Métamorphoses du Ceratopogon geniculatus Guérin. Ann. Soc. Ent. France, iii. Sér. 2, 215.Google Scholar
Edwards, F. W. (1919). A note on the egg-burster of eucephalous fly-larvae. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. Ser. 9, iii. 372–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, F. W. (1920). On the use of the generic name Ceratopogon Meigen. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. Ser. 9, vi. 127–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, F. W. (1923). New and old observations on Ceratopogonine Midges attacking other Insects. Ann. Trap. Med. and Parasit. xviii. 19–29.Google Scholar
Giard, A. (1893). Note sur l'organe appelé spatula sternalis et sur les tubes de Malpighi des larves de Cécidomyes. Ann. Soc. Ent. France, lxii. 80.Google Scholar
Goetghebuer, M. (1912). Éludes sur les Chironomides de Belgique. Mém. de l'acad. R. Belgique, Classe Sciences, Sér. 2, iii. 1–26.Google Scholar
Goetghebuer, M. (1914). Contributions à l'étude des Chironomides de Belgique. Ann. Biol. Lacustre, vii. 165–229, Pls. V–VII.Google Scholar
Goetghebuer, M. (1920–1921). Ceratopogoninae de Belgique: Chironomides de Belgique. Mém. Mus. d'hist. Nat. Belg. viii.Google Scholar
Goetghebuer, M. (1923). Nouvelles contributions à l'étude des Chironomides de Belgique—Larves et nymphes de Cératopogonines. Ann. Biol. Lacustre, xi. 173–186.Google Scholar
Guérin, F. E. (1833). Sur les métamorphoses des Cératopogons et description de deux espèces nouvelles de ce genre, découvertes aux environs de Paris. Ann. Soc. Ent. France, Sér. 1, ii. 161–165, Pl. VIII.Google Scholar
Imms, A. D. (1907–1908). On the larval and pupal stages of Anopheles maculipennis. Pt I, Journ. Hyg. vii. 291–318, Pls. IV–V. Pt II, Parasitology, I. 103–133, Pls. IX–X.Google Scholar
Kahle, W. (1908). Paedogenesis der Cecidomyiden. Zoologica, xxi.Google Scholar
Keilin, D. (1911). Recherches sur la Morphologic larvaire des Diptéres du Genre Phora. Bull. Sci. Fr. et Belg. Ser. 7, xliv. 27–88, Pls. I–IV.Google Scholar
Kahle, W. (1915). Recherches sur les larves de Diptéres Cyclorhaphes. Bull. Sci. Fr. et Belg. Ser. 7, xlix. 1–2.Google Scholar
Kahle, W. (1917). Recherches sur les Anthomyides a larves carnivores. Parasitology, ix. 3. 325–450.Google Scholar
Keilin, D. (1918). Sur quelques modes particuliers de résistance des larves de Diptères centre la dessiccation. Bull. Soc. Ent. France, v. 102–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keilin, D. (1921). On the Life History of Dasyhelea obscura Winn. with some remarks on the Parasites and Hereditary Bacterian Symbiont of this Midge. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. Ser. 9, viii. 576–590, Pls. XIX–XX.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kieffer, J. J. (1901). Zur Kenntnis der Ceratopogon-Larven. All. Zeit.f. Ent. vi. 216–220.Google Scholar
Kieffer, J. J. (1901). Synopse des représentants européens du groupe Ceratopogon, avec description de quelques espèces nouvelles. Bull. Soc. Metz, 143–165.Google Scholar
Kieffer, J. J. (1919). Chironomides d'europe, conservés au Musée National Hongrois de Budapest. Ann. Mus. Nat. Hung. xvii. 1–160.Google Scholar
Loew, H. (1843). Zur Verwandlungsgeschichte einiger Dipteren aus der Abtheilung Nematoceren und ihre Stellung im System. Ent. Ztg. iv. 27–31.Google Scholar
Long, W. H. (1902). New species of Ceratopogon. Biol. Bull. iii. 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meigen, J. W. (1818). Systematische Beschreibung der bekannten Europäischen zweiflugeln Insecten. I. Aachen.Google Scholar
Meijere, J. C. H. de (1902). Ueber die Prothorakalstigmen der Dipterenpuppen. Zool. Jahrb. xv. Abth. f. Morph. 623–692.Google Scholar
Metalnikoff, S. (1902). Beiträge zur Anatomie und Physiologie der Mückenlarve. Bull. de l'acad. Imp. de Sci. de Saint-Pétersbourg, xvii. 49–58.Google Scholar
Miall, L. C. and Hammond, A. R. (1900). The Structure and Life History of the Harlequin Fly, Chironomus plumosus. Oxford, The Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Miall, L. C. and Shelford, R. (1897). The structure and life-history of Phalacrocera replicata. Trans. Ent. Soc. London, 343–366, Pls. VIII–IX.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, H. M. (1921). The larval and pupal stages of the Bibionidae (I). Bull. Ent. Res. xii. 3, 221–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newstead, R. (1911). The Papataci Plies (Phlebotomus) of the Maltese Islands. Ann. Trap. Med. and Parasit. v. 139–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
perris, E. (1847). Notes pour servir à l'histoire des Ceratopogon. Ann. Soc. Ent. France, Sér. 2, v. 555–569.Google Scholar
Perris, E. (1870). Histoire des insectes du Pin maritime (Dipt.). Ann. Soc. Ent. France, Sér. 4, x. 135–366.Google Scholar
Potthast, A. (1915). Über die Metamorphose der Orthocladius-Gruppe. Arch. f. Hydrobiol. Supp. Bd. ii. 243–376.Google Scholar
Rieth, J. Th. (1915). Die Metamorphose der Culicoidinen (Ceratopogoninen). Arch. f. Hydrobiol. Supp. Bd. ii. 377–42.Google Scholar
Theobald, P. V. (1892). An account of British Flies. London.Google Scholar
Thienemann, A. and Zavrel, J. (1916). Die Metamorphose der Tanypinen. Arch. f. Hydrobiol. Supp. Bd. ii. 566–654.Google Scholar
Walker, F. (1856). Insecta Britannica. Diptera, iii. London.Google Scholar
Wasmann, E. (1893). Eine myrmekophile Ceratopogon-Larve. Wien. Ent. Zeitg. xii. 277–279.Google Scholar
Williams, F. X. (1910). The anatomy of the larva of Cecidomyia resinicoloides Williams. Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. iii. 45–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar