Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-pkt8n Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-22T07:42:55.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Some Observations on the Biology and the Ecology of a Venus Striatula Population in the Bay of Douarnenez, Brittany

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

J. Guillou
Affiliation:
Universite de Bretagne Occidentale, Institut d'Etudes Marines, Laboratoire d'Océanographie Biologique, 29283 Brest, France
P. G. Sauriau
Affiliation:
Universite de Bretagne Occidentale, Institut d'Etudes Marines, Laboratoire d'Océanographie Biologique, 29283 Brest, France

Extract

INTRODUCTION

Venus striatula (da Costa) (= Venus gallina L.) occurs in high densities in shallow water on a bottom of clean fine sand in the Bay of Douarnenez. The environmental conditions are characterized by an obvious sediment instability due to a high exposure to westerly swells (Guillou & Le Moal, 1978). This species is preferentially distributed in the fine sands (Petersen, 1913; Thorson, 1957), but is relatively tolerant towards certain ecological factors and so is sometimes found in very muddy sediments. It also shows an extended latitudinal range, since it is recorded from the Lofoten Islands to the Canaries, in the Mediterranean and the Black Sea (Tebble, 1966).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramson, N. J. (comp.), 1970. Computer programs for fish stock assessment. F.A.O. Fisheries Technical Paper, no. 101, pag. var.Google Scholar
Ansell, A. D., 1961. Reproduction, growth and mortality of Venus striatula (da Costa) in Kames Bay, Millport. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 41, 191—215.Google Scholar
Ansell, A. D., 1962. The functional morphology of the larva, and the post-larval development of Venus striatula (da Costa). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 42, 419443.Google Scholar
Ansell, A. D. & Lagardère, F., 1980. Observations on the biology of Donax trunculus and D. vittatus at He d'Oléron (French Atlantic Coast). Marine Biology, 57, 287300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakalem, A., 1979. Contribution à l'Étude des Peuplements Benthiques de la Baie d' Alger. Thèse 3ème Cycle, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, Brest.Google Scholar
Bhattacharya, C. G., 1967. A simple method of resolution of a distribution into gaussian components. Biometrics, 23 (1), 115135.Google Scholar
Bodoy, A. & Massé, H., 1978. Quelques parametres permettant de suivre la production organique d'un Mollusque Bivalve au cours d'un cycle saisonnier. Actes de colloques. Centre National pour l'Exploitation des Océans, no. 7, 753766.Google Scholar
Chassé, C., 1972. Economie Sédimentaire et Biologie {Production) des Estrans Meubles des Côtes de Bretagne. Thèse de Doctorat d'Etat, Sciences Naturelles, Université de Paris VI.Google Scholar
Christensen, A. M., 1970. Feeding biology of the sea-star Astropecten irregularis Pennant. Ophelia, 8, 1134.Google Scholar
Elliott, J. M. & Decamps, H., 1973. Guide pour l'analyse statistique des échantillons d'Invertébrés benthiques. Annales de Limnologie, 9 (2), 79120.Google Scholar
Froglia, C., 1975. La pesca della Vongola Venus gallina nei suoi aspetti biologici, technologici, economico-sociali a commerciali. In Incontri Tecnici, vol. 9, pp. 7—22. Ancona: Laboratorio di Tecnologia della Pesca.Google Scholar
Gros, P. & Cochard, J. C., 1978. Biologie de Nyctiphanes couchii (Crustacea, Euphausiacea) dans le secteur Nord du Golfe de Gascogne. Annales de l'Institut océanographique, 54, 2546.Google Scholar
Guillou, J., 1982. Variabilité des populations de Donax trunculus et Donax vittatus en baie de Douarnenez. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research, 16, 8895.Google Scholar
Guillou, J. & Le Moal, Y., 1978. Variabilitié spatio-temporelle des populations de Donax en baie de Dournenez. Haliotis 9 (1), 7780.Google Scholar
Guillou, J. & Le Moal, Y., 1980. Aspects de la dynamique des populations de Donax vittatus et Donax trunculus en baie de Douarnenez. Annales de l'Institut océanographique, 56, 5564.Google Scholar
Hasselblad, V., 1966. Estimation of parameters for a mixture of normal distributions. Technometrics, 8 (3), 431446.Google Scholar
Jorgensen, C. B., 1946. Reproduction and larval development of Danish marine bottom invertebrates. 9. Lamellibranchia. Meddelelser fra Kommissionen Danmarks Fiskeri- og Havunder- søgelser (ser. Plankton), 41 (1), 277311.Google Scholar
Le Pennec, M., 1970. Elevages au Laboratoire de Mollusques Bivalves: Morphogenèse de la Coquille des Veneridae. Thèse 3ème Cycle, Faculté des Sciences de Paris, Oceanographie Biologique.Google Scholar
Locard, A., 1892. Les coquilles marines des cotes de France. Annales de la Société linnéenne de Lyon, 37, 384 pp.Google Scholar
Lucas, A., 1965. Recherches sur la sexualité des Mollusques Bivalves. Bulletin biologique de la France et de la Belgique, 99, 115247.Google Scholar
Mars, P., 1965. Faune marine Pyrénées orientates. 5. Mollusques aplacophores, Polyplacophores, Scaphopodes et Bivalves. Vie et milieu, supplement 15 (4), 1156.Google Scholar
Massé, H., 1971. Contribution à l' Étude Quantitative et Dynamique de la Macrofaune des Peuplements des Sables Fins Infra-littoraux des Côtes de Provence. Thèse de Doctorat d'Etat, Sciences Naturelles, Université d'Aix-Marseille.Google Scholar
Petersen, C. G. J., 1913. Valuation of the sea. II. The animal communities of the sea-bottom and their importance for marine zoogeography. Report of the Danish Biological Station to the Board of Agriculture, 21, 42 pp.Google Scholar
Rees, C. B., 1951. Continuous plankton records: first report on the distribution of lamellibranch larvae in the North Sea. Hull Bulletins of Marine Ecology, 3, 105134.Google Scholar
Rhoads, D. C. & Lutz, R. A., 1980. Skeletal Growth of Aquatic Organisms: Biological Records of Environmental Change, xiii, 750 pp. New York: Plenum Press. [Topics in Geobiology, vol. 1.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, C. A., Crisp, D. J. & Runham, N. W., 1979. Tidally deposited growth bands in the shell of the common cockle Cerastoderma edule (L.). Malacologia, 18, 277290.Google Scholar
Salvatorelli, G., 1967. Osservazioni sul ciclo riproduttivo annuo di Venus gallina (Molluschi Lamellibranchi). Annali dell' Università di Ferrara, N.S. 2 (2), 1522.Google Scholar
Tebble, N., 1966. British Bivalve Seashells: A Handbook for Identification. London: British Museum (Natural History).Google Scholar
Thorson, G., 1957. Bottom communities (sublittoral or shallow shelf). Memoirs. Geological Society of America, 67 (1), 461534.Google Scholar
Thorson, G., 1966. Some factors influencing the recruitment and establishment of marine benthic communities. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research, 3, 267293.Google Scholar
Trevallion, A., 1971. Studies on Tellina tenuis da Costa. III. Aspects of general biology and energy flow. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 7, 95122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vives, F. & Suau, P., 1962. Sobre la chirla (Venus gallina) de la desembocadura del rio Ebro. Investigacion pesquera, 21, 145153.Google Scholar
Warwick, R. M., George, C. L. & Davies, J. R., 1978. Annual macrofauna production in a Venus community. Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science, 7, 215—241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar