Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T16:25:18.071Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Profilicollis botulus (Acanthocephala) abundance in the eider duck (Somateria mollissima) on the Ythan estuary, Aberdeenshire

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

A. B. Thompson
Affiliation:
Culterty Field Station, Aberdeen University, Newburgh, Aberdeenshire, Scotland AB4 OAA

Summary

The abundance of Profilicollis botulus was monitored in eider ducks for 3 years. No significant difference in P. botulus abundance was found between eiders taken alive and those collected dead from the shore line, or between adult males and adult females. Adult male eiders had a seasonal pattern of infection. Incubating female eiders lost their infection in almost all cases, suggesting that a seasonal pattern of infection must also occur in these birds. Eiders in their first winter had P. botulus abundances which were approximately 10 times that of adult eiders, but by the following summer the abundance had declined to that found in adults. Data are compared with previous studies undertaken on the Ythan estuary. Captive eiders were used to determine the developmental rate of female P. botulus and the percentage of administered cystacanths which established in the intestine. There was no evidence to suggest that male and female P. botulus have different life–spans.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baillie, S. R. & Milne, H. (1982). The influence of female age on breeding in the eider Somateria mollissima. Bird Study 29, 5566.Google Scholar
Baird, D. & Milne, H. (1981). Energy flow in the Ythan estuary, Aberdeenshire, Scotland. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 13, 455–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, C. A. & Threlfall, W. (1974). Helminth parasites of the common eider duck, Somateria mollissima (L.), in Newfoundland and Labrador. Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Washington 41, 2535.Google Scholar
Bougeois, C. E. & Threlfall, W. (1982). Metazoan parasites of three species of scoter (Anatidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology 60, 2253–7.Google Scholar
Burlingame, P. L. & Chandler, A. C. (1941). Host–parasite relations of Moniliformis dubius(Acanthocephala) in albino rats, and the environmental nature of resistance to single and superimposed infections with this parasite. American Journal of Hygiene 33, 121.Google Scholar
Cantin, M., Bedard, J. & Milne, H. (1974). The food and feeding of common eiders in the St. Lawrence estuary in summer. Canadian Journal of Zoology 52, 319–34.Google Scholar
Clark, G. M., O'Meara, D. & van Weelden, J. W. (1958). An epizootic among eider ducks involving an acanthocephalid worm. Journal of Wildlife Management 22, 204–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crompton, D. W. T. & Harrison, J. G. (1965). Observations on Polymorphus minutus (Goeze, 1782) (Acanthocephala) from a wildfowl reserve in Kent. Parasitology 55, 345–55.Google Scholar
Cross, S. X. (1934). A probable case of non–specific immunity between two parasites of ciscoes of the Trout lake region of Northern Wisconsin. Journal of Parasitology 20, 244–5.Google Scholar
Elliott, J. M. (1971). Some Methods for the Statistical Analysis of Samples of Benthic Invertebrates. Freshwater Biological Association, Scientific Publication No. 25.Google Scholar
Garden, E. A., Rayski, C. & Thom, V. M. (1964). A parasitic disease in eider ducks. Bird Study 11, 280–7.Google Scholar
Gorman, M. L. (1974). Criteria for ageing embryos of the eider. Wildfowl 25, 2932.Google Scholar
Grenquist, P. (1970). On mortality of the eider duck (Somateria mollissima) caused by acanthocephalan parasites. Suomen Riista 22, 2434. (In Finnish, English summary.)Google Scholar
Harrison, J. M. (1955). A case of nodular taeniasis due to Filicollis anatis in an eider duck Somateria mollissima mollissima (Linnaeus). Bulletin of the British Ornithological Club 75, 121–3.Google Scholar
Holmes, J. C. (1961). Effects of concurrent infections on Hymenolepis diminuta (Cestoda) and Moniliformis dubius (Acanthocephala). I. General effects and comparison with crowding. Journal of Parasitology 47, 209–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holmes, J. C. (1962). Effects of concurrent infections on Hymenolepis diminuta (Cestoda) and Moniliformis dubius (Acanthocephala). II. Effects on growth. Journal of Parasitology 48, 8796.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hynes, H. B. N. & Nicholas, W. L. (1963). The importance of the acanthocephalan Polymorphus minutus as a parasite of domestic ducks in the United Kingdom. Journal of Helminthology 37, 185–98.Google Scholar
Kulachkova, V. G. (1958). Ecological and faunistical survey of the parasites of the eider in the Gulf of Kandalaksha. Trudy Kandalakshskogo Gosudarstvennogo Zapovodonika 1, 103–60. (In Russian.)Google Scholar
Lapage, G. (1961). A list of the parasitic Protozoa, helminths and Arthropoda recorded from species of the family Anatidae (ducks, geese and swans). Parasitology 51, 1109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liat, L. B. & Pike, A. W. (1980). The incidence and distribution of profilicollis botulus (Acanthocephala), in the eider duck, Somateria mollissima, and in its intermediate host the shore crab, Carcinus maenas, in north east Scotland. Journal of Zoology 190, 3951.Google Scholar
McDonald, M. E. (1969). Catalogue of helminths of waterfowl (Anatidae). Special Scientific Report U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Wildlife No. 126.Google Scholar
Mendenhall, V. M. (1975). Growth and mortality factors of eider ducklings (Somateria m. mollissima) in north–east Scotland. Ph.D. thesis, University of Aberdeen.Google Scholar
Milne, H. (1974). Breeding numbers and reproductive rate of eiders at the Sands of Forvie National Nature Reserve, Scotland. Ibis 116, 135–52.Google Scholar
Milne, H. (1976). Body weights and carcass composition of the common eider. Wildfowl 27, 115–22.Google Scholar
Milne, H. & Dunnet, G. M. (1972). Standing crop, productivity and trophic relations of the fauna of the Ythan estuary. In The Estuarine Environment (ed. Barnes, R. S. K. and Green, J.), pp. 86105England: Applied Science.Google Scholar
MonnÉ, L. & Hönig, G. (1954). On the embryonic envelopes of Polymorphus botulus and P. minutus (Acanthocephala). Arkiv för Zoologi 7, 257–60.Google Scholar
Nicholas, W. L. & Hynes, H. B. N. (1958). Studies on Polymorphus minutus (Goeze, 1782) (Acanthocephala) as a parasite of the domestic duck. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 52, 3647.Google Scholar
Parshad, V. R. & Crompton, D. W. T. (1981). Aspects of acanthocephalan reproduction. Advances in Parasitology 19, 73138.Google Scholar
Rayski, C. & Garden, E. A. (1961). Life–cycle of an acanthocephalan parasite of the eider duck. Nature, London 192, 185–6.Google Scholar
Sanford, S. E. (1978). Mortality in mute swans in southern Ontario associated with infestation with the thorny–headed worm, Polymorphus boschadis. Canadian Veterinary Journal 19, 234–6.Google Scholar
Soulsby, E. J. L. (1968). Helminths, Arthropods and Protozoa of Domesticated Animals. London: Baillière, Tindall & Cassell.Google Scholar
Swennen, C. & Broek, E. van den (1960). Polymorphus botulus als parasiet bij de eidereenden in de Waddenzee. Ardea 48, 90–7.Google Scholar
Thom, V. M. & Garden, E. A. (1955). A heavy mortality among eider ducks. Fair Isle Bird Observatory Bulletin 2, 325.Google Scholar
Thompson, A. B. (1985 a). Analysis of Profilicollis botulus (Acanthocephala: Echinorhynchidae) burdens in the shore crab, Carcinus maenas. Journal of Animal Ecology 54, 595604.Google Scholar
Thompson, A. B. (1985 b). Transmission dynamics of Profilicollis botulus (Acanthocephala) from crabs (Carcinus maenas) to eider ducks (Somateria mollissima) on the Ythan estuary, N.E. Scotland. Journal of Animal Ecology 54, 605–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uspenskaja, A. V. (1960). Parasitofaune des crustacés benthiques de la mer de Barents. Annales de Parasitologie Humaine et Comparée 35, 221–42.Google Scholar