Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g5fl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T16:29:43.803Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Derivation and assessment of vegetation maps for reindeer pasture analysis in Arctic European Russia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2007

W.G. Rees  and
F.S. Danks
W.G. Rees
Affiliation:
Scott Polar Research Institute, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge CB2 1ER
F.S. Danks
Affiliation:
Scott Polar Research Institute, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge CB2 1ER
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Throughout northern Eurasia, the presence of reindeer is a complicating factor in the consideration of interactions between vegetation and climate. The ability to interpret future changes in these interactions will depend on access to maps of sufficient detail to represent aspects of vegetation distribution relevant to reindeer grazing, amongst which we particularly identify lichens and shrubs. Such maps, if they are to have circumpolar coverage, can only feasibly be produced on a routine basis using satellite imagery having wide swaths but comparatively coarse resolution. This paper presents qualitative and quantitative comparisons between three such maps, and two more detailed vegetation maps compiled from fieldwork and from recent field-trained satellite image analysis, all for a study area in the Nenets Autonomous Okrug, Russia. It is shown that, despite its high degree of generalisation, the Circumpolar Arctic Vegetation Map provides the best representation of the vegetation in the study area amongst the three circumpolar land-cover maps that were examined, but that none of the three is entirely satisfactory. While the adequate representation of shrubs and lichens currently continues to depend on the analysis of field data or high-resolution satellite imagery which is unsuitable for circumpolar mapping, it is suggested that the prospects for satellite-based circumpolar vegetation mapping capable of including these components is promising.

Type
Articles
Information
Polar Record , Volume 43 , Issue 4 , October 2007 , pp. 290 - 304
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ACIA (Arctic Climate Impact Assessment). 2004. Impacts of a warming Arctic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Betts, R.A. 2000. Offset of the potential carbon sink from boreal forestation by decreases in surface albedo. Nature 408: 187–190.Google Scholar
Brown, J. F., Loveland, T.R., Merchant, J.W., Reed, B.C., and Ohlen, D.O.. 1993. Using multisource data in global land cover characterization: concepts, requirements and methods. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 59: 977–987.Google Scholar
Cihlar, J., Latifovic, R., and Beaubien, J.. 2000. A comparison of clustering strategies for unsupervised classification. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing 26: 446–454.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. 1960. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 20: 37–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornelissen, J.H.C., Callaghan, T.V., Alatalo, J.M., Michelsen, A., Graglia, E., Hartley, A.E., Hik, D.S., Hobbie, S.E., Press, M.C., Robinson, C.H., Henry, G.H.R., Shaver, G.R., Phoenix, G.K., Gwynn, D., Jonasson, S., Chapin, F.S., Molau, U., Neill, C., Lee, J.A., Melillo, J.M., Sveinbjörnsson, B., and Aerts, R.. 2001. Global change and arctic ecosystems: is lichen decline a function of increases in vascular plant biomass? Journal of Ecology 89: 984–994.Google Scholar
Cramér, H. 1999. Mathematical methods of statistics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Eidenshink, J.C., and Faundeen, J.L.. 1994. The 1 km AVHRR global land data set-first stages in implementation. International Journal of Remote Sensing 15: 3443–3462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Commission. 2003. Global land cover 2000 database. URL: http://www-gem.jrc.it/glc2000 (Last access 6 February 2006).Google Scholar
Finn, J. T. 1993. Use of the average mutual information index in evaluating classification error and consistency. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 7: 349–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gower, J. C. 1966. Some distance properties of latent root and vector methods used in multivariate analysis. Biometrika 53: 325–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, R., Kuhry, P., Christensen, T., Sykes, M.T., Dankers, R., and van de Linden, S.. 2002. Climate feedbacks at the tundra-taiga interface. Ambio (Special Report 12): 47–55.Google Scholar
Hinzman, L. D., Bettez, N.D., Bolton, W.R., Chapin, F.S., Dyurgerov, M.B., Fastie, C.L., Griffith, B., Hollister, R.D., Hope, A., Huntington, H.P., Jensen, A.M., Jia, G.J., Jorgenson, T., Kane, D.L., Klein, D.R., Kofinas, G., Lynch, A.H., Lloyd, A.H., McGuire, A.D., Nelson, F.E., Oechel, W.C., Osterkamp, T.E., Racine, C.H., Romanovsky, V.E., Stone, R.S., Stow, D.A., Sturm, M., Tweedie, C.E., Vourlitis, G.L., Walker, M.D., Walker, D.A., Webber, P.J., Welker, J.M., Winker, K.S., and Yoshikawa, K.. 2005. Evidence and implications of recent climate change in northern Alaska and other arctic regions. Climatic Change 72: 251–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hope, A., Boynton, W., Stow, D., and Douglas, D.. 2003. Interannual growth dynamics of vegetation in the Kuparuk river watershed based on the normalized difference vegetation index. International Journal of Remote Sensing 24: 3413–3425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isachenko, T.I., Lavrinenko, E.M., Gribova, S.A., Karpenko, A.S., Lipatova, V.V., Yurkovskaya, T.K., Gerbikh, A.A., and Katenina, G.D.. 1974. Map of vegetation of the European part of the USSR. Moscow: Chief administration of geodesy and cartography, Council of Ministers of the USSR.Google Scholar
Käyhkö, J., and Pellikka, P.. 1994. Remote sensing of the impact of reindeer grazing on vegetation in northern Fennoscandia. Polar Research 13: 115–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kershaw, K.A. 1985. Physiological ecology of lichens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Klein, D.R. 1999. The roles of climate and insularity in establishment and persistence of Rangifer tarandus populations in the high Arctic. Ecological Bulletins 47: 96–104.Google Scholar
Kumpula, J., Colpaert, A., and Nieminen, M.. 2000. Condition, potential recovery rate, and productivity of lichen (Cladonia spp.) ranges in the Finnish reindeer management area. Arctic 53: 152–160.Google Scholar
Lunetta, R., and Lyon, J.G. (editors). 2004. Remote sensing and GIS accuracy assessment. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Marceau, D.J. 1999. The scale issue in social and natural sciences. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing 25: 347–356.Google Scholar
Marceau, D.J., and Hay, G.J.. 1999. Remote sensing contributions to the scale issue. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing 25: 357–366.Google Scholar
Monserud, R.A., and Leemans, R.. 1992. Comparing global vegetation maps with the Kappa statistic. Ecological Modelling 62: 275–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, W., Patil, G.P., and Taillie, C.. 1999. Cluster coordinated composites of diverse datasets on several spatial scales for designing extensive environmental sample surveys: prospectus on promising protocols. In: Ghosh, S. (editor). Multivariate analysis, design of experiments and survey sampling. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc: 119–133.Google Scholar
Nordberg, M.-L., and Allard, A.. 2002. A remote sensing methodology for monitoring lichen cover. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing 28: 262–274.Google Scholar
Olson, J.S. 1994a. Global ecosystem framework-definitions. Sioux Falls, S.D: USGS Eros Data Center.Google Scholar
Olson, J.S. 1994b. Global ecosystem framework-translation strategy. Sioux Falls: USGS EROS Data Center.Google Scholar
Quattrochi, D.A., and Goodchild, M.F.. 1997. Scale in remote sensing and GIS. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Lewis.Google Scholar
Rees, G., Brown, I., Mikkola, K., Virtanen, T., and Werkman, B.. 2002. How can the dynamics of the tundra-taiga boundary be remotely monitored? Ambio (Special Report 12): 56–62.Google Scholar
Rees, W. G., and Rigina, O.. 2003. Methodologies for remote sensing of the environmental impacts of industrial activity in the Arctic and Sub-Arctic. In: Rasmussen, R.O., and Koroleva, N.E. (editors). Social and environmental impacts in the North. Dordrecht: Kluwer: 67–88.Google Scholar
Rees, W. G., Williams, M., and Vitebsky, P.. 2003. Mapping land cover changes in a reindeer herding area of the Russian Arctic using Landsat TM and ETM+ imagery and indigenous knowledge. Remote Sensing of Environment 85: 441–452.Google Scholar
Rees, W. G., Tutubalina, O.V., and Golubeva, E.I.. 2004. Reflectance spectra of subarctic lichens between 400 and 2400 nm. Remote Sensing of Environment 90: 281–292.Google Scholar
Sandström, P., Granqvist Pahlén, T., Edenius, L., Tømmervik, H., Hagner, O., Hemberg, L., Olsson, H., Baer, K., Stenlund, T., Göran Brandt, L., and Egberth, M.. 2003. Conflict resolution by participatory management: remote sensing and GIS as tools for communicating land-useneeds for reindeer herding in northern Sweden. Ambio 32: 557–567.Google Scholar
Silapaswan, C., Verbyla, D., and McGuire, D.. 2001. Land cover changes on the Seward Peninsula: the use of remote sensing to evaluate potential influences of climate change on historical vegetation dynamics. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing 5: 542–554.Google Scholar
Skre, O., Baxter, R., Crawford, R.M.M., Callaghan, T.V., and Fedorkov, A.. 2002. How will the tundra-taiga interface respond to climate change? Ambio (Special Report 12): 37–46.Google Scholar
Stow, D. A., Hope, A., McGuire, D., Verbyla, D., Gamon, J., Huemmrich, F., Houston, S., Racine, C., Sturm, M., Tape, K., Hinzman, L., Yoshikawa, K., Tweedie, C., Noyle, B., Silapaswan, C., Douglas, D., Griffith, B., Jia, G., Epstein, H., Walker, D., Daeschner, S., Petersen, A., Zhou, L., and Myneni, R.. 2004. Remote sensing of vegetation and land-cover change in Arctic tundra ecosystems. Remote Sensing of Environment 89: 281–308.Google Scholar
Sturm, M., Racine, C., and Tape, K.. 2001. Climate change: increasing shrub abundance in the Arctic. Nature 411: 546–547.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Théau, J. and Duguay, C.R.. 2004. Lichen mapping in the summer range of the George River caribou herd using Landsat TM imagery. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing 30: 867–881.Google Scholar
Théau, J., Peddle, D.R., and Duguay, C.R.. 2005. Mapping lichen in a caribou habitat of northern Quebec, Canada, using an enhancement-classification method and spectral mixture analysis. Remote Sensing of Environment 94: 232–243.Google Scholar
Theil, H. 1972. Statistical decomposition analysis. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Tømmervik, H., Høgda, K.A., and Solheim, I., 2003. Monitoring vegetation changes in Pasvik (Norway) and Pechenga in Kola Peninsula (Russia) using multitemporal Landsat MSS/TM data. Remote Sensing of Environment 85: 370–388.Google Scholar
Tømmervik, H., Johansen, B., Tombre, I., Thannheiser, D., Høgda, K.A., Gaare, E., and Wielgolaski, F.E.. 2004. Vegetation changes in the Nordic mountain birch forest: the influence of grazing and climate change. Arctic, Antarctic and Alpine Research 36: 323–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van de Linden, S., Virtanen, T., Oberman, N., and Kuhry, P.. 2003. Sensitivity analysis of the discharge in the Arctic Usa basin, east-European Russia. Climatic Change 57: 139–161.Google Scholar
van Herk, C.M., Aptroot, A., and Dobben, H.F.. 2002. Long-term monitoring in the Netherlands suggests that lichens respond to global warming. Lichenologist 3: 141–154.Google Scholar
Walker, D. A., Bay, C., Daniels, F.J.A., Einarsson, E., Elvebakk, A., Kapitsa, B.E., Kholod, S.S., Murray, D.F., Talbot, S.S., Yurtsev, B.A., and Zoltai, S.C.. 1995. Toward a new Arctic vegetation map: a review of existing maps. Journal of Vegetation Science 6: 427–436.Google Scholar
Walker, D. A., Gould, W.A., Maier, H.A., and Raynolds, M.K.. 2002. The circumpolar Arctic vegetation map: AVHRR-derived base maps, environmental controls, and integrated mapping procedures. International Journal of Remote Sensing 23: 4551–4570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, J. 1999. Hierarchy and scaling: extrapolating information along a scaling ladder. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing 25: 367–380.Google Scholar