Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-fwgfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T03:19:52.893Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Assessment of ASTER global digital elevation model data for Arctic research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 July 2011

W. G. Rees*
Affiliation:
Scott Polar Research Institute, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge CB2 1ER (wgr2@cam.ac.uk)

Abstract

A new source of digital elevation data, the advanced spaceborne thermal emission and reflection radiometer (ASTER) global digital elevation model (GDEM), has been freely available since 2009. It provides enormously greater coverage of the Arctic than previous satellite derived ‘global’ digital elevation models, extending to a latitude of 83 °N in contrast to 60 °N. The GDEM is described as a preliminary, research grade product. This paper investigates its accuracy in a number of specifically Arctic landscapes, including ice and snow, boreal forest, tundra and unvegetated terrain, using test sites in Svalbard, Iceland, Norway and Russia. Semivariogram analysis is used to characterise the magnitude and spatial correlation of errors in the GDEM products from the test sites. The analysis suggests that the horizontal resolution of the GDEM data is around 130 m, somewhat coarser than the sampling interval of 1 second of latitude and longitude. The vertical accuracy is variable, and the factors influencing it have not been systematically explored. However, it appears that the likely accuracy can be estimated from ‘stacking number’ data supplied with the elevation data. The stacking number is the number of independent digital elevation models averaged to generate the supplied product. Provided that this number is greater than around 6 the data have an rms accuracy of typically 5–10 m.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ASTER GDEM validation team. 2009. ASTER global DEM validation: summary report. URL http://www.ersdac.or.jp/GDEM/E/3.html (accessed 13 May 2011).Google Scholar
Biehl, L., and Landgrebe, D.. 2002. MultiSpec – a tool for multispectral-hyperspectral image data analysis. Computers and Geosciences 28 (10): 11531159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DLR Earth Observation. 2011. DLR – Earth observation – TanDEM-X – the Earth in three dimensions. URL: http://www.dlr.de/eo/en/desktopdefault.aspx/tabid-5727/10086_read-21046/ (accessed 13 May 2011).Google Scholar
Erdogan, S. 2010. Modelling the spatial distribution of error with geographically weighted regression: an experimental study. Computers and Geosciences 36 (1): 3443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, P. 1998. Improved modelling of elevation error with geostatistics. Geoinformatica 2: 215233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, P.F., and Tate, N.J.. 2006. Causes and consequences of error in digital elevation models. Progress in Physical Geography 30: 467489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GTOPO30 Documentation. 2011. URL: http://www1.gsi.go.jp/geowww/globalmap-gsi/gtopo30/README.html (accessed 13 May 2011).Google Scholar
Jones, K.L., Poole, G.C., O'Daniel, S.J., Mertes, L.A.K., and Stanford, J.A.. 2008. Surface hydrology of low-relief landscapes: assessing surface water flow impedance using LiDAR-derived digital elevation models. Remote Sensing of Environment 112 (11): 41484158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Racoviteanu, A.E., Manley, W.F., Arnaud, Y., and Williams, M.W.. 2007. Evaluating digital elevation models for glaciologic applications: an example from Nevado Coropuna, Peruvian Andes. Global and Planetary Change 59: 110125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasband, W.S. 1997. Image J. URL: http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij (accessed 13 May 2011).Google Scholar
Shuttle Radar Topography Mission. 2011. URL: http://www2.jpl.nasa.gov/srtm/index.html (accessed 13 May 2011).Google Scholar