Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Heinrich, Tobias
and
Witko, Christopher
2022.
Technology Threats to Employment, Issues, and Candidate and Party Preferences in the United States.
Political Research Quarterly,
Vol. 75,
Issue. 3,
p.
797.
Abramson, Scott F.
Kocak, Korhan
and
Magazinnik, Asya
2022.
What Do We Learn about Voter Preferences from Conjoint Experiments?.
American Journal of Political Science,
Vol. 66,
Issue. 4,
p.
1008.
Levatino, Antonina
2022.
What do exchange students value when choosing a destination for their study period abroad? A conjoint experiment.
Globalisation, Societies and Education,
p.
1.
Farkas, Attila
Kovarek, Daniel
and
Farkas, Eszter
2022.
Last Place Aversion, Labor Market Competition or Welfare State Model? Explaining Anti-Immigrant Sentiment in Hungary with a Conjoint Experiment.
SSRN Electronic Journal ,
Zhao, Anqi
and
Ding, Peng
2022.
Regression-based causal inference with factorial experiments: estimands, model specifications and design-based properties.
Biometrika,
Vol. 109,
Issue. 3,
p.
799.
Ne’eman, Ari
Bell, Elizabeth
Schneider, Monica C.
and
Strolovitch, Dara
2022.
Identifying And Exploring Bias In Public Opinion On Scarce Resource Allocation During The COVID-19 Pandemic.
Health Affairs,
Vol. 41,
Issue. 10,
p.
1513.
Al-Omari, Basem
Farhat, Joviana
and
Ershaid, Mai
2022.
Conjoint Analysis: A Research Method to Study Patients’ Preferences and Personalize Care.
Journal of Personalized Medicine,
Vol. 12,
Issue. 2,
p.
274.
Ward, Peter
and
Denney, Steven
2022.
Welfare chauvinism among co‐ethnics: Evidence from a conjoint experiment in South Korea.
International Migration,
Vol. 60,
Issue. 5,
p.
74.
FREDERIKSEN, KRISTIAN VREDE SKAANING
2022.
Does Competence Make Citizens Tolerate Undemocratic Behavior?.
American Political Science Review,
Vol. 116,
Issue. 3,
p.
1147.
Carnahan, Dustin
Ulusoy, Ezgi
Barry, Rachel
McGraw, Johnny
Virtue, Isabel
and
Bergan, Daniel E
2022.
What should I believe? A conjoint analysis of the influence of message characteristics on belief in, perceived credibility of, and intent to share political posts.
Journal of Communication,
Vol. 72,
Issue. 5,
p.
592.
Tanaka, Ayumu
Ito, Banri
and
Jinji, Naoto
2022.
Individual Preferences Toward Inward Foreign Direct Investment: A Conjoint Survey Experiment.
SSRN Electronic Journal ,
Kubo, Yoshiaki
and
Okada, Isamu
2022.
COVID-19 health certification reduces outgroup bias: evidence from a conjoint experiment in Japan.
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications,
Vol. 9,
Issue. 1,
Doherty, David
2022.
What Can Conjoint Experiments Tell Us about Americans’ Abortion Attitudes?.
American Politics Research,
Vol. 50,
Issue. 2,
p.
147.
Bansak, Kirk
Hainmueller, Jens
Hopkins, Daniel J.
and
Yamamoto, Teppei
2023.
Using Conjoint Experiments to Analyze Election Outcomes: The Essential Role of the Average Marginal Component Effect.
Political Analysis,
Vol. 31,
Issue. 4,
p.
500.
Liu, Guoer
and
Shiraito, Yuki
2023.
Multiple Hypothesis Testing in Conjoint Analysis.
Political Analysis,
Vol. 31,
Issue. 3,
p.
380.
Ganter, Flavien
2023.
Identification of Preferences in Forced-Choice Conjoint Experiments: Reassessing the Quantity of Interest.
Political Analysis,
Vol. 31,
Issue. 1,
p.
98.
Miwa, Hirofumi
Kasuya, Yuko
and
Ono, Yoshikuni
2023.
Voters’ perceptions and evaluations of dynastic politics in Japan.
Asian Journal of Comparative Politics,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 3,
p.
671.
Burack, Beatrice
Everett, Lanie
Xu, Mei
and
Horiuchi, Yusaku
2023.
Legislative Effectiveness Overshadowed by Political Polarization in U.S. Elections.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Harris, Adam S.
and
Honig, Lauren
2023.
Mutual Dependence and Expectations of Cooperation.
The Journal of Politics,
Vol. 85,
Issue. 1,
p.
192.
Barnfield, Matthew
2023.
Misinformation in Experimental Political Science.
Perspectives on Politics,
Vol. 21,
Issue. 4,
p.
1210.