Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-nptnm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-02T17:16:55.464Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Structural, Thermal, and Thermomechanical Behaviors of Phenolic-Inorganic Hybrid Composites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Samuel Amanuel
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL 62901–4401
Vivak M. Malhotra
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL 62901–4401
Get access

Abstract

In pursuit of our goal of forming organic-inorganic hybrid frictional materials, we produced two types of composites, i.e., conventional and hybrid. We formed conventional composites by dispersing fly ash, montmorillonite clay, or pre-formed nano-sized silica particles in phenolic matrix. Hybrid composites were fabricated from sol-gel technique using tetramethylor-thosilicate-phenolic mixtures. We subjected our samples to X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), in-situ transmission-Fourier transform infrared (ISTA-FTIR), and dynamic mechanical analyzer (DMA) measurements at 40°C < T < 310°C. Our results suggested that the curing behavior of the phenolic polymer was affected by the concentration of the silica and hybrid composites manifested mechanical properties, which were substantially different from that of conventional composites.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Dagani, R., Putting the 'Nano' into Composites, Chemical & Engineering News (June, 7, 1999), pp. 2537.Google Scholar
2. Radisic, A., Valimbe, P. S., and Malhotra, V. M., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 524, 13 (1999).Google Scholar
3. Callister, W. D. Jr, “Material Science and Engineering”, 4th ed., (John Wiley & Sons, 1997), pp. 510544.Google Scholar
4. Haraguchi, K., and Usami, Y., Chem. Lett.,, 51 (1997).Google Scholar
5. Haraguchi, K., Usami, Y., and Ono, Y., J. Mater. Sci.,, 33, 3337 (1998).Google Scholar
6. Morikawa, A., Iyoku, Y., Kakimoto, M., and Imai, Y., J. Mater. Chem,, 2, 679 (1992).Google Scholar
7. Morikawa, A., Iyoku, Y., Kakimoto, M., and Imai, Y., Polymer J.,, 24, 107 (1992).Google Scholar
8. Wang, S., Ahmad, Z., and Mark, J. E., Macromolecules Rep.,, A31, 411 (1994).Google Scholar
9. Schmidt, H., Scholze, H., and Tunker, G, J. Non-Cryst Solids,, 80, 557 (1986).Google Scholar
10. Landry, C. J. T., Coltrain, B. K., and Brandy, B. K., Polymer,, 33, 1487 (1992).Google Scholar
11. Wang, M. S. and Pinnavaia, T. J., Chem. Mater.,, 6, 468 (1994).Google Scholar
12. Mu, R. and Malhotra, V. M., Phys. Rev. B, 44, 4296 (1991);Google Scholar
Jasty, S. and Malhotra, V. M., Phys. Rev. B, 45, 1 (1991).Google Scholar
13. Ko, T-H., Kuo, W-S., and Lu, Y-R., Polymer Composites,, 21, 96 (2000).Google Scholar