Syntactic L1-Attrition and Re-Exposure

06 November 2020, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed by Cambridge University Press at the time of posting.

Abstract

Previous work on relative clause attachment ambiguity has observed both that speakers of different languages resolve this ambiguity with different biases and that one’s native bias is susceptible to attrition. Recently it has also been suggested that crosslinguistic differences in biases may be reduced to a syntactic difference, namely the availability of pseudo relatives. Integrating this with the multilingual data, the present poster explores whether attrition in attachment biases may be related to a change in pseudo-relative parsing. To that end, a sentence interpretation task was conducted. In that task, the availability of pseudo-relatives was manipulated. Participants consisted of native Italian speakers living either in Italy or an English-speaking country. Results indicated a clear effect of condition, but do not replicate previous findings of attrition. This latter finding is discussed with regard to re-exposure.

Keywords

L1-Attrition
Pseudo-Relatives

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.