The Properly Improper: Making Sense of Humanity through Derrida, Butler and Rosaldo

07 October 2021, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed by Cambridge University Press at the time of posting.

Abstract

That which is proper to humans or which makes a human proper- of which hundreds have been conceptualized- consists of ethics, moral values, expression, responsibilities at the nexus of society, culture, individual differences. As these conceptualizations are closely scrutinized, the universality of a proper being begins to disintegrate, binaries emerge along with the ethical questions to which the answers are not easily found. In this paper, beginning with the religious theorization of what is a proper human, making sense of it through Kafka’s Metamorphosis and elucidating on the aspects of humans like Gaze, Animality, and Rage that puts propriety into question, ethical questions are raised which are suggestive of human ignorance towards the obvious. Abstracting from the works of Jacques Derrida, Renato Rosaldo, and Judith Butler, this paper attempts to answer the question of what is being a proper human by examining the culture, contexts, and contemporary intersectionality.

Keywords

Gaze
Animality
Rage
Hierarchy

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.