The role of private military companies in the light of International Humanitarian Law (IHL)

22 August 2022, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed by Cambridge University Press at the time of posting.

Abstract

In this research paper it has been explained how the changing nature of conflict has encouraged the private military companies to participate in the state affairs. The mercenaries that have existed almost for centuries have started to operate in a more systematic manner now. It is argued in this indenture what Machiavelli had suggested a long while ago. The mercenaries can help you with the short term gains but they cannot win you wars. It is explained how the mercenaries are not bound by any moral obligation. They are often found involved in human rights violations. An attempt has been made to understand the utility of mercenaries in the light of International Humanitarian Law (IHL). The knowledge of IHL is important to analyze how the private militaries can be held accountable by Law.

Keywords

IHL
International Humanitarian Law
private military companies

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.