Could a parrot build a spaceship? Evolutionary constraints on the language of a space-faring species

21 December 2022, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed by Cambridge University Press at the time of posting.

Abstract

It is uncontroversial that a technological civilisation anywhere in the universe capable of building interplanetary transport must possess a form of language, so that complex cooperation between individuals is possible. However, the nature of ETI language (Extra Terrestrial Intelligence) is potentially very different from human language, both in its modality (e.g. acoustic, visual), and possibly also in its information encoding paradigm (e.g. words and sentences, grammar). If an alien species communicated with a very small repertoire of sounds, would it be incapable of developing sophisticated cooperative technology? Could such communication systems ever evolve to be true language? If physical constraints on the diversification of repertoire lead to the evolution of a low-vocabulary communication system, language may develop in unexpected directions, which would pose a problem for the identification and interpretation of ET signals.

Supplementary weblinks

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.