![Author ORCID: We display the ORCID iD icon alongside authors names on our website to acknowledge that the ORCiD has been authenticated when entered by the user. To view the users ORCiD record click the icon. [opens in a new tab]](https://www.cambridge.org/engage/assets/public/coe/logo/orcid.png){kind=logo}
Abstract
A new framework linking economics with remote-sensing means impermanent carbon reduction can be directly compared with permanent drawdown.
The value of impermanent carbon credits
30 January 2023, Version 1
Working Paper
Climate Change and Sustainability
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed by Cambridge University Press at the time of posting.
Comments
Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed
by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our
Commenting and Discussion Policy
[opens in a new tab]
- please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for
scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can
find more information about how to use the commenting feature here
[opens in a new tab]
.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy
[opens in a new tab]
and
Terms of Service
[opens in a new tab]
apply.
Version History
Jan 30, 2023 Version 1
Metrics
2,200
2,253
0
Views
Downloads
Citations
Funding
Royal Society Wolfson Research Merit Award
ESRC Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy (CCCEP)
ES/R009708/1
Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, at the London School of Economics
Frank Jackson Trust
The Dragon Capital Chair of Biodiversity Economics, funded by Dragon Capital
Tezos Foundation gift to the Cambridge Centre for Carbon Credits, University of Cambridge
Author’s competing interest statement
The author(s) have declared they have no conflict of interest with regard
to this content
Ethics
The author(s) have declared ethics committee/IRB approval is not relevant
to this content