Geothermal Power Disputes: Quantifying Production Loss

25 September 2023, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed by Cambridge University Press at the time of posting.

Abstract

Commonly, the projected power output and subsequent profitability of a geothermal power plant is based on data taken from the feasibility study provided to the project’s lenders during the exploratory stage of the project. Due to the upfront investment risks in geothermal power plants, it is largely accepted that the main purpose of a feasibility study is to build a business case for funding support from private, public, or institutional bodies. In this paper I highlight the pitfalls of relying on traditional feasibility study data for geothermal power plants and give examples of various post-feasibility study factors that directly affect profitability. This includes, but is not limited to; projected well production, ambient temperature, internal consumption, plant availability and government pricing legislation.

Supplementary materials

Title
Description
Actions
Title
CV Darren Bernardo (Quantum Expert Witness)
Description
I am a testifying Expert Witness in the area of power construction claims. I have testified in arbitration over production disputes in the geothermal power sector.
Actions

Supplementary weblinks

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.