Carbon credits and the “Peter Pan” forests

23 November 2023, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed by Cambridge University Press at the time of posting.

Abstract

Natural Climate Solutions have gained prominence as pivotal strategies for climate change mitigation, with tropical reforestation an important and cost-effective approach. However, despite significant reforestation commitments, the potential of natural forest re-growth remains underutilized, with second-growth forests, akin to the perpetual youth of the fictional character Peter Pan, repeatedly cleared, hindering their contribution to carbon sequestration and biodiversity conservation. We investigate the persistent challenges faced by regenerating second-growth tropical forests and discuss the need for novel carbon crediting approaches to incentivize their protection and restoration. Current carbon accounting frameworks, designed for afforestation and reforestation, overlook the unique characteristics of Peter Pan forests. We argue for a paradigm shift in carbon accounting that places Peter Pan forest intermediate between avoided conversion (REDD+) and reforestation (ARR). To ensure additionality we propose a nuanced statistical approach, combining satellite-derived time series with economic pressure indicators. This method aims to generate credible counterfactual scenarios for assessing carbon stock increases relative to those in the absence of carbon finance. Moreover, we highlight the socio-economic factors influencing second-growth forest persistence, emphasizing the need for integrated food production and forest restoration policies.

Keywords

Carbon
Biodiversity
Natural climate solutions
credits
forest restoration
Tropical

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.
Comment number 1, Robin Chazdon: Dec 02, 2023, 00:12

I am eager to join you in this statement. There are many issues blocking effective inclusion of ANR projects and NR project in carbon credit programs. Please let me know how I can participate, as I have been planning to write such a paper! Robin Chazdon