Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T20:10:04.265Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Observing Group Interaction

The Benefits of Taking Group Dynamics Seriously

from Part II - Application Areas of Interaction Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2018

Elisabeth Brauner
Affiliation:
Brooklyn College, City University of New York
Margarete Boos
Affiliation:
University of Göttingen
Michaela Kolbe
Affiliation:
ETH Zürich
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, J. A., Yoerger, M. A., Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., & Jones, J. (2015). Would you please stop that!?: The relationship between counterproductive meeting behaviors, employee voice, and trust. Journal of Management Development, 34, 12721287. doi:10.1108/JMD-02-2015-0032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Argyris, C. (2002). Double-loop learning, teaching, and research. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 1, 206218. doi:10.5465/AMLE.2002.8509400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arora, S., Ahmed, M., Paige, J., Nestel, D., Runnacles, J., Hull, L., … Sevdalis, N. (2012). Objective Structured Assessment of Debriefing (OSAD): Bringing science to the art of debriefing in surgery. Annals of Surgery, 256, 982988. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182610c91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ballard, D. I., Tschan, F., & Waller, M. J. (2008). All in the timing: Considering time at multiple stages of group research. Small Group Research, 39, 328351. doi:org/10.1177/1046496408317036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., & Funder, D. C. (2007). Psychology as the science of self-reports and finger movements: Whatever happened to actual behavior? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 396403. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00051.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bhanji, F., Mancini, M. E., Sinz, E., Rodgers, D. L., McNeil, M. A., Hoadley, T. A.,… Hazinski, M. F. (2010). Part 16: Education, implementation, and teams. American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care 122 (18 suppl 3), S920S933. doi:10.1161/circulationaha.110.971135Google ScholarPubMed
Boos, M., Kolbe, M., & Strack, M. (2011). An inclusive model of group coordination. In Boos, M., Kolbe, M., Kappeler, P., & Ellwart, T. (Eds.), Coordination in human and primate groups (pp. 1136). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boos, M., Pritz, J., Lange, S., & Belz, M. (2014). Leadership in moving human groups. PLoS Computational Biology, 10, e1003541. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003541CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brauer, D. G., Strand, M. S., Sanford, D. E., Kushnir, V. M., Lim, K.-H., Mullady, D. K.,… Fields, R. C. (2017). Utility of a multidisciplinary tumor board in the management of pancreatic and upper gastrointestinal diseases: an observational study. HPB, 19, 133139. doi:10.1016/j.hpb.2016.11.002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brett-Fleegler, M., Rudolph, J. W., Eppich, W. J., Monuteaux, M., Fleegler, E., Cheng, A., & Simon, R. (2012). Debriefing assessment for simulation in healthcare. Development and psychometric properties. Simulation in Healthcare, 7, 288294. doi:10.1097/SIH.0b013e3182620228CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brodbeck, F. & Greitemeyer, T. (2000). A dynamic model of group performance: Considering the group members’ capacity to learn. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 3, 159182. doi:10.1177/1368430200003002004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burtscher, M. J., Manser, T., Kolbe, M., Grote, G., Grande, B., Spahn, D. R., & Wacker, J. (2011). Adaptation in anaesthesia team coordination in response to a simulated critical event and its relationship to clinical performance. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 10, 801806. doi:10.1093/bja/aer039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, A., Eppich, W., Grant, V., Sherbino, J., Zendejas, B., & Cook, D. A. (2014). Debriefing for technology-enhanced simulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medical Education, 48, 657666. doi:10.1111/medu.12432CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooper, J. B., Newbower, R. S., & Kitz, R. J. (1984). An analysis of major errors and equipment failures in anesthesia management: Considerations for prevention and detection. Anesthesiology, 60, 3442.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooper, S. J., & Cant, R. P. (2014). Measuring non-technical skills of medical emergency teams: An update on the validity and reliability of the Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM). Resuscitation, 85(1), 3133. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.08.276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Couto, T. B., Kerrey, B. T., Taylor, R. G., FitzGerald, M., & Geis, G. L. (2015). Teamwork skills in actual, in situ, and in-center pediatric emergencies: Performance levels across settings and perceptions of comparative educational impact. Simulation in Healthcare, 10, 7684. doi:10.1097/sih.0000000000000081CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cronin, M. A., Weingart, L. R., & Todorova, G. (2011). Dynamics in groups: Are we there yet? The Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 571612. doi:10.1080/19416520.2011.590297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeRue, D. S., Nahrgang, J. D., Hollenbeck, J. R., & Workman, K. (2012). A quasi-experimental study of after-event reviews and leadership development. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 9971015. doi:org/10.1037/a0028244CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dietz, A. S., Pronovost, P. J., Benson, K. N., Mendez-Tellez, P. A., Dwyer, C., Wyskiel, R., & Rosen, M. A. (2014). A systematic review of behavioural marker systems in healthcare: what do we know about their attributes, validity and application? BMJ Quality & Safety, 23, 10311039. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002457CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eddy, E. R., Tannenbaum, S. I., & Mathieu, J. E. (2013). Helping teams to help themselves: Comparing two team-led debriefing methods. Personnel Psychology, 66, 9751008. doi:10.1111/peps.12041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 350383. doi:10.2307/2666999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmondson, A. C. (2012). Teaming: How organizations learn, innovate, and compete in the knowledge economy. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Ellis, S., Ganzach, Y., Castle, E., & Sekely, G. (2010). The effect of filmed versus personal after-event reviews on task performance: The mediating and moderating role of self-efficacy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 122131. doi:10.1037/a0017867CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellis, S., Mendel, R., & Aloni-Zohar, M. (2009). The effect of accuracy of performance evaluation on learning from experience: The moderating role of After-Event Reviews. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39, 541563. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00450.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eppich, W., Mullan, P. C., Brett-Fleegler, M., & Cheng, A. (2016). “Let’s talk about it”: translating lessons from healthcare simulation to clinical event debriefings and clinical coaching conversations. Clinical Pediatric Emergency Medicine, 17, 200211. doi:10.1016/j.cpem.2016.07.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrugia, D. J., Fischer, T. D., Delitto, D., Spiguel, L. R. P., & Shaw, C. M. (2015). Improved breast cancer care quality metrics after implementation of a standardized tumor board documentation template. Journal of Oncology Practice, 11, 421423. doi:10.1200/jop.2015.003988CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fernandez Castelao, E., Russo, S. G., Cremer, S., Strack, M., Kaminski, L., Eich, C.,… Boos, M. (2011). Positive impact of crisis resource management training on no-flow time and team member verbalisations during simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A randomized controlled trial. Resuscitation, 82, 13381343. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.05.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernandez Castelao, E., Russo, S. G., Riethmüller, M., & Boos, M. (2013). Effects of team coordination during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Critical Care, 28, 504521. doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2013.01.005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fletcher, G., Flin, R., McGeorge, P., Glavin, R., Maran, N., & Patey, R. (2004). Rating non-technical skills: Developing a behavioral marker system for use in anaesthesia. Cognition, Technology, & Work, 6, 165171. doi:10.1007/s10111-004-0158-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flin, R. & Mitchell, L. (Eds.). (2009). Safer surgery: Analysing behaviour in the operating theatre. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Graumann, C. F. (1979). Die Scheu des Psychologen vor der Interaktion. Ein Schisma und seine Geschichte [The unease of the psychologist in face of interaction. A schism and its history]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 10, 284304.Google Scholar
Grote, G., Kolbe, M., Zala-Mezö, E., Bienefeld-Seall, N., & Künzle, B. (2010). Adaptive coordination and heedfulness make better cockpit crews. Ergonomics, 52, 211228. doi:10.1080/00140130903248819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruenfeld, D. H., Mannix, E. A., Williams, K. Y., & Neale, M. A. (1996). Group composition and decision making: How member familiarity and information distribution affect process and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67(1), 115. doi:org/10.1006/obhd.1996.0061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurtner, A., Tschan, F., Semmer, N.-K., & Naegele, C. (2007). Getting groups to develop good strategies: Effects of reflexivity interventions on team process, team performance, and shared mental models. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102, 127142. doi:org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.05.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Homayounfar, K., Mey, D., Boos, M., Gaedcke, J., & Ghadimi, M. (2015). Communication in the tumor board. Forum, 30, 214217. doi:10.1007/s12312-015-1301-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, L., Russ, S., Ahmed, M., Sevdalis, N., & Birnbach, D. J. (2017). Quality of interdisciplinary postsimulation debriefing: 360° evaluation. BMJ Simulation and Technology Enhanced Learning, 3(1), 916. doi:10.1136/bmjstel-2016-000125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunziker, S., Johansson, A. C., Tschan, F., Semmer, N. K., Rock, L., Howell, M. D., & Marsch, S. (2011). Teamwork and leadership in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 57, 23812388. doi:org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.03.017CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Husebø, S. E., Dieckmann, P., Rystedt, H., Søreide, E., & Friberg, F. (2013). The relationship between facilitators’ questions and the level of reflection in postsimulation debriefing. Simulation in Healthcare, 8, 135142. doi:10.1097/SIH.0b013e31827cbb5cCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, K., Rosen, M., Duval-Arnould, J., & Hunt, E. (2014). Development of a cardiopulmonary resuscitation non-technical skills scoring tool (CPR-NTS). Critical Care Medicine, 42, A1427. doi:10.1097/01.ccm.0000457773.66160.b8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keating, N. L., Landrum, M. B., Lamont, E. B., Bozeman, S. R., Shulman, L. N., & McNeil, B. J. (2013). Tumor boards and the quality of cancer care. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 105, 113121. doi:10.1093/jnci/djs502CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kehl, K. L., Landrum, M. B., Kahn, K. L., Gray, S. W., Chen, A. B., & Keating, N. L. (2015). Tumor board participation among physicians caring for patients with lung or colorectal cancer. Journal of Oncology Practice, 11, e267e278. doi:10.1200/jop.2015.003673CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kemper, P. F., van Noord, I., de Bruijne, M., Knol, D. L., Wagner, C., & van Dyck, C. (2013). Development and reliability of the explicit professional oral communication observation tool to quantify the use of non-technical skills in healthcare. BMJ Quality & Safety, 22, 586595. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001451CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kessler, D. O., Cheng, A., & Mullan, P. C. (2015). Debriefing in the emergency department after clinical events: A practical guide. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 65, 690698. doi:org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.10.019CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, T., McFee, E., Olguin Olguin, D., Waber, B., & Pentland, A. (2012). Sociometric badges: Using sensor technology to capture new forms of collaboration. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 412427. doi:10.1002/job.1776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolbe, M. (2007). Koordination von Entscheidungsprozessen in Gruppen. Die Bedeutung expliziter Koordinationsmechanismen. [Coordination of decision making in groups. The importance of explicit coordination mechanisms.] Saarbrücken, Germany: VDM.Google Scholar
Kolbe, M., Burtscher, M., & Manser, T. (2013). Co-ACT – A framework for observing coordination behavior in acute care teams. BMJ Quality & Safety, 22, 596605. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001319CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kolbe, M., Burtscher, M. J., Manser, T., Künzle, B., & Grote, G. (2011). The role of coordination for preventing harm in healthcare groups: Research examples from anaesthesia and an integrated model of coordination for action teams in healthcare. In Boos, M., Kolbe, M., Kappeler, P., & Ellwart, T. (Eds.), Coordination in human and primate groups (pp. 7592). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolbe, M., Burtscher, M. J., Wacker, J., Grande, B., Nohynkova, R., Manser, T.,… Grote, G. (2012). Speaking-up is related to better team performance in simulated anesthesia inductions: An observational study. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 115, 10991108. doi:10.1213/ANE.0b013e318269cd32CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kolbe, M., Grande, B., & Spahn, D. R. (2015). Briefing and debriefing during simulation-based training and beyond: Content, structure, attitude, and setting. Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology, 29(1). doi:org/10.1016/j.bpa.2015.01.002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kolbe, M., Grote, G., Waller, M. J., Wacker, J., Grande, B., Burtscher, M., & Spahn, D. (2014). Monitoring and talking to the room: Autochthonous coordination patterns in team interaction and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 12541267. doi:org/10.1037/a0037877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolbe, M., Künzle, B., Zala-Mezö, E., Wacker, J., & Grote, G. (2009). Measuring coordination behaviour in anaesthesia teams during induction of general anaesthetics. In Flin, R. & Mitchell, L. (Eds.), Safer surgery. Analysing behaviour in the operating theatre (pp. 203221). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Kolbe, M., Künzle, B., Zala-Mezö, E., Wacker, J., Spahn, D. R., & Grote, G. (2010). Adaptive coordination makes better anesthesia crews. Paper presented at the 25th SIOP Annual Conference, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
Kolbe, M., Marty, A., Seelandt, J., & Grande, B. (2016). How to debrief teamwork interactions: using circular questions to explore and change team interaction patterns. Advances in Simulation, 1(1), 29. doi:10.1186/s41077-016-0029-7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kolbe, M., Strack, M., Stein, A., & Boos, M. (2011). Effective coordination in human group decision making: MICRO-CO. A micro-analytical taxonomy for analysing explicit coordination mechanisms in decision-making groups. In Boos, M., Kolbe, M., Kappeler, P., & Ellwart, T. (Eds.), Coordination in human and primate groups (pp. 199219). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konradt, U., Schippers, M. C., Garbers, Y., & Steenfatt, C. (2015). Effects of guided reflexivity and team feedback on team performance improvement: The role of team regulatory processes and cognitive emergent states. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24, 777795. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2015.1005608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kozlowski, S. W. (2015). Advancing research on team process dynamics: Theoretical, methodological, and measurement considerations. Organizational Psychology Review, 5, 270299. doi:10.1177/2041386614533586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Künzle, B., Zala-Mezö, E., Wacker, J., Kolbe, M., & Grote, G. (2010). Leadership in anaesthesia teams: The most effective leadership is shared. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 19, 16. doi:10.1136/qshc.2008.030262Google ScholarPubMed
Lamb, B. W., Green, J. S. A., Benn, J., Brown, K. F., Vincent, C. A., & Sevdalis, N. (2013). Improving decision making in multidisciplinary tumor boards: Prospective longitudinal evaluation of a multicomponent intervention for 1,421 patients. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 217, 412420. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.04.035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamb, B. W., Sevdalis, N., Mostafid, H., Vincent, C., & Green, J. S. A. (2011). Quality improvement in multidisciplinary cancer teams: An investigation of teamwork and clinical decision-making and cross-validation of assessments. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 18, 35353543. doi:10.1245/s10434-011-1773-5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larson, J. J. R., Sargis, E. G., Elstein, A. S., & Schwartz, A. (2002). Holding shared versus unshared information: Its impact on perceived member influence in decision-making groups. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 24, 145155. doi:10.1207/S15324834BASP2402_6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, J. R. J., Foster-Fishman, P. G., & Franz, T. M. (1998). Leadership style and the discussion of shared and unshared information in decision-making groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 482495. doi:org/10.1177/0146167298245004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann-Willenbrock, N. (2017). Team learning. Small Group Research, 48, 123130. doi:0.1177/1046496416689308CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., Allen, J. A., & Kauffeld, S. (2013). A sequential analysis of procedural meeting communication: How teams facilitate their meetings. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 41, 365388. doi:10.1080/00909882.2013.844847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., Chiu, M. M., Lei, Z., & Kauffeld, S. (2017). Understanding positivity within dynamic team interactions. Group & Organization Management, 42(1), 3978. doi:10.1177/1059601116628720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., Meinecke, A. L., Rowold, J., & Kauffeld, S. (2015). How transformational leadership works during team interactions: A behavioral process analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 26, 10171033. doi:org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.07.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., Meyers, R. A., Kauffeld, S., Neininger, A., & Henschel, A. (2011). Verbal interaction sequences and group mood: Exploring the role of team planning communication. Small Group Research, 42, 639668. doi:10.1177/1046496411398397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lei, Z., Waller, M. J., Hagen, J., & Kaplan, S. (2016). Team adaptiveness in dynamic contexts: Contextualizing the roles of interaction patterns and in-process planning. Group & Organization Management, 41, 491525. doi:10.1177/1059601115615246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manser, T., Dieckmann, P., Wehner, T., & Rall, M. (2007). Comparison of anaesthetists’ activity patterns in the operating room and during simulation. Ergonomics, 50, 246260. doi:10.1080/00140130601032655CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manser, T., Howard, S. K., & Gaba, D. M. (2008). Adaptive coordination in cardiac anaesthesia: A study of situational changes in coordination patterns using a new observation system. Ergonomics, 51, 11531178. doi:10.1080/00140130801961919CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26, 356376. doi:10.5465/AMR.2001.4845785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, C. L., Petersen, N. J., Naik, A. D., Velde, N. V., Artinyan, A., Albo, D., … Anaya, D. A. (2014). Implementation of a regional virtual tumor board: A prospective study evaluating feasibility and provider acceptance. Telemedicine Journal and e-Health, 20, 705711. doi:10.1089/tmj.2013.0320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathieu, J. E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Donsbach, J. S., & Alliger, G. M. (2014). A review and integration of team composition models moving toward a dynamic and temporal framework. Journal of Management, 40(1), 130160. doi:10.1177/0149206313503014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGrath, J. E., & Tschan, F. (2004). Temporal matters in social psychology. Examining the role of time in the lives of groups and individuals. Washington, DC: APA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mesmer-Magnus, J. R., & DeChurch, L. A. (2009). Information sharing and team performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 535546. doi:10.1037/a0013773CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mojzisch, A., & Schulz-Hardt, S. (2010). Knowing others’ preferences degrades the quality of group decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 794808. doi:org/10.1037/a0017627CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mullan, P. C., Kessler, D. O., & Cheng, A. (2014). Educational opportunities with postevent debriefing. JAMA, 312, 23332334. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.15741CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nestel, D., Walker, K., Simon, R., Aggarwal, R., & Andreatta, P. (2011). Nontechnical skills: An inaccurate and unhelpful descriptor? Simulation in Healthcare, 6(1), 23. doi:10.1097/SIH.0b013e3182069587CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pox, C., Aretz, S., Bischoff, S. C., Graeven, U., Hass, M., Heußner, P., … Schmiegel, W. (2013). S3-Leitlinie Kolorektales Karzinom Version 1.0 – Juni 2013 AWMF-Registernummer: 021/007OL. [S3-Guideline Colorectal Cancer Version 1.0]. Zeitschrift für Gastroenterologie, 51, 753854. doi:10.1055/s-0033-1350264Google Scholar
Reynard, J., Reynolds, J., & Stevenson, P. (2009). Practical patient safety. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riethmüller, M., Fernandez Castelao, E., Eberhardt, D., Timmermann, A., & Boos, M. (2012). Adaptive coordination development in student anaesthesia teams: A longitudinal study. Ergonomics, 55(1), 5568. doi:10.1080/00140139.2011.636455CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robertson, E. R., Hadi, M., Morgan, L. J., Pickering, S. P., Collins, G., New, S.,… Catchpole, K. C. (2014). Oxford NOTECHS II: A modified theatre team non-technical skills scoring system. PLoS ONE, 9, e90320. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0090320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roe, R. A. (2008). Time in applied psychology: The study of “what happens” rather than “what is”. European Psychologist, 13(1), 3752. doi:10.1027/1016-9040.13.1.37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roe, R. A. (2011). What is wrong with mediators and moderators? Paper presented at the 15th European Congress of Work & Organizational Psychology, Maastricht, Netherlands.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roe, R. A. (2014). Test validity from a temporal perspective: Incorporating time in validation research. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 23, 754768. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2013.804177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudolph, J. W., Simon, R., Rivard, P., Dufresne, R. L., & Raemer, D. B. (2007). Debriefing with good judgment: Combining rigorous feedback with genuine inquiry. Anesthesiology Clinics, 25, 361376. doi:10.1016/j.anclin.2007.03.007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salas, E., & Frush, K. (Eds.). (2013). Improving patient safety through teamwork and team training. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Salas, E., Sims, D. E., & Burke, C. S. (2005). Is there a “big five” in teamwork? Small Group Research, 36, 555599. doi:10.1177/1046496405277134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salas, E., Tannenbaum, S., Cohen, D., & Latham, G. (Eds.). (2013). Developing and enhancing teamwork in organisations: Evidence-based best practices and guidelines. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Schmutz, J., Hoffman, F., Heimberg, E., & Manser, T. (2015). Effective coordination in medical emergency teams: The moderating role of task type. European Journal of Work and Organization Psychology, 24, 761776. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2015.1018184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmutz, J. B., & Eppich, W. J. (2017). Promoting learning and patient care through shared reflection: A conceptual framework for team reflexivity in health care. Academic Medicine. Advance online publication. doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000001688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Seelandt, J., Grande, B., Kriech, S., & Kolbe, M. (2017). DE-CODE: A coding scheme for assessing debriefing interactions. BMJ Simulation and Technology Enhanced Learning. doi:10.1136/bmjstel-2017-000233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seelandt, J. C., Kolbe, M., Heckel, H., & Grande, B. (2016). Enhancing team learning in acute care team by using debriefings. Paper presented at the SESAM, Lisbon, Portugal.Google Scholar
Seelandt, J. C., Tschan, F., Keller, S., Beldi, G., Jenni, N., Kurmann, A., … Semmer, N. K. (2014). Assessing distractors and teamwork during surgery: developing an event-based method for direct observation. BMJ Quality & Safety, 23, 918929. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2014-002860CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shah, S., Arora, S., Atkin, G., Glynne-Jones, R., Mathur, P., Darzi, A., & Sevdalis, N. (2014). Decision-making in colorectal cancer tumor board meetings: Results of a prospective observational assessment. Surgical Endoscopy, 28, 27832788. doi:10.1007/s00464-014-3545-3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snyder, J., Schultz, L., & Walbert, T. (2017). The role of tumor board conferences in neuro-oncology: a nationwide provider survey. Journal of Neuro-Oncology, 133(1), 17. doi:10.1007/s11060-017-2416-xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soar, J., Mancini, M. E., Bhanji, F., Billi, J. E., Dennett, J., Finn, J., … Morley, P. T. (2010). Part 12: Education, implementation, and teams. Resuscitation, 81(1), e288e332. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.08.030CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stachowski, A. A., Kaplan, S. A., & Waller, M. J. (2009). The benefits of flexible team interaction during crisis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 15361543. doi:10.1037/a0016903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stasser, G., & Stewart, D. (1992). Discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: Solving a problem versus making a judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 426434. doi:org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.3.426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1985). Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 14671578. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.48.6.1467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1987). Effects of information load and percentage of shared information on the dissemination of unshared information during group discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 8193. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.53.1.81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Su, L., Kaplan, S., Burd, R., Winslow, C., Hargrove, A., & Waller, M. (2017). Trauma resuscitation: can team behaviours in the prearrival period predict resuscitation performance? BMJ Simulation and Technology Enhanced Learning, 3, 106110. doi:10.1136/bmjstel-2016-000143CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tafe, L. J., Gorlov, I. P., de Abreu, F. B., Lefferts, J. A., Liu, X., Pettus, J. R., … Chamberlin, M. D. (2015). Implementation of a molecular tumor board: The impact on treatment decisions for 35 patients evaluated at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center. The Oncologist, 20, 10111018. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0097CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tannenbaum, S. I., Beard, R. L., & Cerasoli, C. P. (2013). Conducting team debriefings that work: Lessons from research and practice. In Salas, E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Cohen, D., & Latham, G. (Eds.), Developing and enhancing teamwork in organizations: Evidence-based best practices and guidelines (pp. 488519). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Tannenbaum, S. I., Mathieu, J. E., Salas, E., & Cohen, D. (2012). Teams are changing: Are research and practice evolving fast enough? Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 5(1), 224. doi:10.1111/j.1754-9434.2011.01396.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Center for Medical Simulation. (2010). Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare (DASH)©. Rater’s Handbook. Retrieved September 23, 2013, from www.harvardmedsim.org/_media/DASH.handbook.2010.Final.Rev.2.pdf.Google Scholar
Thenappan, A., Halaweish, I., Mody, R. J., Smith, E. A., Geiger, J. D., Ehrlich, P. F., … Newman, E. A. (2017). Review at a multidisciplinary tumor board impacts critical management decisions of pediatric patients with cancer. Pediatric Blood & Cancer, 64, 254258. doi:10.1002/pbc.26201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tschan, F., Seelandt, J. C., Keller, S., Semmer, N. K., Kurmann, A., Candinas, D., & Beldi, G. (2015). Impact of case-relevant and case-irrelevant communication within the surgical team on surgical-site infection. British Journal of Surgery, 102, 17181725. doi:10.1002/bjs.9927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tschan, F., Semmer, N. K., Gautschi, D., Hunziker, P., Spychiger, M., & Marsch, S. U. (2006). Leading to recovery: Group performance and coordinative activities in medical emergency driven groups. Human Performance, 19, 277304. doi:10.1207/s15327043hup1903_5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tschan, F., Semmer, N. K., Gurtner, A., Bizzari, L., Spychiger, M., Breuer, M., & Marsch, S. U. (2009). Explicit reasoning, confirmation bias, and illusory transactive memory. A simulation study of group medical decision making. Small Group Research, 40, 271300. doi:10.1177/1046496409332928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tschan, F., Semmer, N. K., Hunziker, S., Kolbe, M., Jenni, N., & Marsch, S. U. (2014). Leadership in different resuscitation situations. Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care, 4, 3236. doi:org/10.1016/j.tacc.2013.12.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tschan, F., Semmer, N. K., Vetterli, M., Gurtner, A., Hunziker, S., & Marsch, S. U. (2011). Developing observational categories for group process research based on task and coordination-requirement analysis: Examples from research on medical emergency-driven teams. In Boos, M., Kolbe, M., Kappeler, P., & Ellwart, T. (Eds.), Coordination in human and primate groups (pp. 93118). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Undre, S., Sevdalis, N., Healey, A. N., Darzi, A., & Vincent, C. A. (2007). Observational Teamwork Assessment for Surgery (OTAS): Refinement and application in urological surgery. World Journal of Surgery, 31, 13731381. doi:10.1007/s00268-007-9053-zCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Undre, S., Sevdalis, N., & Vincent, C. (2009). Observing and assessing surgical teams: The Observational Teamwork Assessment for Surgery (OTAS). In Flin, R. & Mitchell, L. (Eds.), Safer surgery. Analysing behaviour in the operating theatre (pp. 83101). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Valentine, M. A., Nembhard, I. M., & Edmondson, A. C. (2015). Measuring teamwork in health care settings: A review of survey instruments. Medical Care, 53, e16e30. doi:10.1097/MLR.0b013e31827feef6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vashdi, D. R., Bamberger, P. A., & Erez, M. (2013). Can surgical teams ever learn? The role of coordination, complexity, and transitivity in action team learning. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 945971. doi:10.5465/amj.2010.0501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, M., Kolbe, M., Grote, G., Dambach, M., Marty, A., Spahn, D. R., & Grande, B. (2014). Agency and communion predict speaking up in acute care teams. Small Group Research, 45, 290313. doi:10.1177/1046496414531495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, M., Kolbe, M., Grote, G., Spahn, D. R., & Grande, B. (2017). Why didn’t you say something? Using after-event reviews to affect voice behavior and hierarchy beliefs in multi-professional action teams. European Journal of Work and Organization Psychology, 26(1), 6680. doi:org/10.1080/1359432X.2016.1208652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittenbaum, G. M., Bowman, J. M., & Hollingshead, A. B. (2003). Strategic information sharing in mixed-motive decision-making groups. Paper presented at the Small Group Division of the National Communication Association. Miami, FL.Google Scholar
Woolley, A. W., Aggarwal, I., & Malone, T. W. (2015). Collective intelligence and group performance. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 420424. doi:10.1177/0963721415599543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolley, A. W., Chabris, C. F., Pentland, A., Hashmi, N., & Malone, T. W. (2010). Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. Science, 330, 686688. doi:10.1126/science.1193147CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yule, S., Flin, R., Paterson-Brown, S., Maran, N., & Rowley, D. (2006). Development of a rating system for surgeons’ non-technical skills. Medical Education, 40, 1098–1104. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02610.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zala-Mezö, E., Wacker, J., Künzle, B., Brüesch, M., & Grote, G. (2009). The influence of standardisation and task load on team coordination patterns during anaesthesia inductions. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 18, 127130. doi:10.1136/qshc.2007.025973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zijlstra, F. R. H., Waller, M. J., & Phillips, S. I. (2012). Setting the tone: Early interaction patterns in swift-starting teams as a predictor of effectiveness. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 21, 749777. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2012.690399CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×