Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T19:59:59.780Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2019

Verlan Lewis
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Ideas of Power
The Politics of American Party Ideology Development
, pp. 183 - 198
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abraham, Henry. 2008. Justices, Presidents, and Senators: A History of the U.S. Supreme Court Appointments from Washington to Bush II. 5th edn. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
Abramowitz, Alan. 2010. The Disappearing Center: Engaged Citizens, Polarization, and American Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Adams, Greg. 1997. “Abortion: Evidence of an Issue Evolution.” American Journal of Political Science 41 (3): 718737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, Henry. 1891. History of the United States of America during the First Administration of Thomas Jefferson. Vol. 2. 9 vols. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
Aldrich, John. 1980. Before the Convention. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, John. 1995. Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, John. 2011. Why Parties?: A Second Look. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, John, and Grant, Ruth. 1993. “The Antifederalists, the First Congress, and the First Parties.” Journal of Politics 55 (2): 295326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, John, Montgomery, Jacob, and Sparks, David. 2014. “Polarization and Ideology: Partisan Sources of Low Dimensionality in Scaled Roll Call Analyses.” Political Analysis 22 (4): 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, John, Sullivan, John L., and Borgida, Eugene. 1989. “Foreign Affairs and Issue Voting: Do Presidential Candidates ‘Waltz Before a Blind Audience?’American Political Science Review 83 (1): 123141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Political Science Association. 1950. “Toward a More Responsible Two-Party System: A Report of the Committee on Political Parties.” American Political Science Review 44 (3): Part 2, Supplement.Google Scholar
Anzia, Sarah F., and Moe, Terry M.. 2016. “Do Politicians Use Policy to Make Politics? The Case of Public-Sector Labor Laws.” American Political Science Review 110 (4): 763777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balkin, Jack M., and Levinson, Sanford. 2001. “Understanding the Constitutional Revolution.” Virginia Law Review 87 (6): 10451104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banning, Lance. 1978. The Jeffersonian Persuasion: Evolution of a Party Ideology. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Barber, Michael, and McCarty, Nolan. 2013. “Causes and Consequences of Polarization.” In Negotiating Agreement in Politics, edited by Mansbridge, Jane and Martin, Cathie Jo, 1953. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
Beard, Charles A. 1928. The American Party Battle. New York: Workers Education Bureau Press, Inc.Google Scholar
Beer, Samuel H. 1978. “In Search of a New Public Philosophy.” In The New American Political System, edited by King, Anthony, 544. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.Google Scholar
Bensel, Richard. 2005. “A Cross of Gold, a Crown of Thorns: Preferences and Decisions in the 1896 Democratic National Convention.” In Preferences and Situations: Points of Intersection between Historical and Rational Choice Institutionalism, edited by Katznelson, Ira and Weingast, Barry R., 2761. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Bensel, Richard. 2016. “Political Economy and American Political Development.” In The Oxford Handbook of American Political Development, edited by Vallelly, Richard M., Mettler, Suzanne, and Lieberman, Robert C., 6995. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Benson, Allan. 1911. The Usurped Power of the Courts. Chicago: Socialist Party National Office.Google Scholar
Berkman, Michael. 1993. The State Roots of National Politics: Congress and the Tax Agenda, 1978–1986. Pittsburgh, PA: Pittsburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Binkley, Wilfred. 1943. American Political Parties: Their Natural History. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Boorstin, Daniel. 1953. The Genius of American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Borosage, Robert L. 1994. “The Nation: Despite GOP Attacks, Clinton Foreign Policy Echos Bush’s.” The Los Angeles Times, June 26. Accessed February 15, 2014. http://articles.latimes.com/1994–06-26/opinion/op-8579_1_foreign-policy.Google Scholar
Breckenridge, John. 1802. “Proceedings February 2, 1801.” Annals of Congress. Washington, DC: Library of Congress, February 2. 178180.Google Scholar
Brewer, Mark, and Stonecash, Jeffrey. 2009. Dynamics of American Political Parties. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brutus, . 1787/2014. “The Antifederalist, No. 1.” In Readings in American Politics: Analysis and Perspectives, 3rd edn, edited by Kollman, Ken. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.Google Scholar
Brutus, . 1788/1981. “Essays of Brutus XV.” In The Complete Anti-Federalist. Vol. 2, edited by Storing, Herbert J., 360452. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bryce, James. 1888. The American Commonwealth. Vol. 2. 3 vols. London: Macmillan and Co.Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund. 1770/1981. “Thoughts on the Cause of the Present Discontents.” In The Writings and Speeches of Edmund Burke. Vol 2, edited by Langford, Paul. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Burnham, Walter Dean. 1970. Critical Elections and the Mainsprings of American Politics. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.Google Scholar
Burnham, Walter Dean, and Chambers, William Nisbet (eds.). 1967. The American Party Systems: Stages of Political Development. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Burns, Jennifer. 2017. “Objectively Speaking, Rand Is History.” Hoover Digest 3: 170174.Google Scholar
Burns, John W. 1997. “Party Policy Change: The Case of the Democrats and Taxes, 1956–68.” Party Politics 3 (4): 513532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busby, Joshua W., Monten, Jonathan, and Inboden, William. 2012. “American Foreign Policy Is Already Post-Partisan.” Foreign Affairs. May 30. Accessed February 14, 2019. www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2012-05-30/american-foreign-policy-already-post-partisan.Google Scholar
Bush, George Walker. 2000. “Presidential Candidates Debates: ‘Presidential Debate in Winston-Salem, North Carolina.’” The American Presidency Project. October 11. Accessed February 21, 2014. www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=29419.Google Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip, Miller, Warren, and Stokes, Donald. 1960. The American Voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Gurin, Gerald, and Miller, Warren. 1999. American National Election Studies, 1952: Time Series Study. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies.Google Scholar
Carmines, Edward, and Stimson, James. 1989. Issue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caro, Robert. 2003. Master of the Senate: The Years of Lyndon Johnson. New York: First Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Carroll, Royce, Lewis, Jeff, Lo, James, McCarty, Nolan, Poole, Keith, and Rosenthal, Howard. 2015. “DW-NOMINATE Scores with Bootstrapped Standard Errors.” May 25. Accessed August 26, 2016. voteview.com/dwnomin.htm.Google Scholar
Carsey, Thomas, and Layman, Geoffrey. 2006. “Changing Sides or Changing Minds? Party Identification and Policy Preferences in the American Electorate.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (2): 464477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ceaser, James. 1979. Presidential Selection: Theory and Development. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ceaser, James. 1984. “The Theory of Governance of the Reagan Administration.” In The Reagan Presidency and the Governing of America, edited by Salamon, Lester M. and Lund, Michael S., 5787. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar
Ceaser, James. 1992. Liberal Democracy and Political Science. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Ceaser, James. 2000. What Is the Public Philosophy? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ceaser, James. 2006. Nature and History in American Political Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Chicago Tribune. 1952. “The New Eisenhower.” The Chicago Tribune. September 27: 10.Google Scholar
Clark, Tom S. 2011. The Limits of Judicial Independence. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Tom S. 2013. “Data.” Accessed July 1, 2015. www.tomclarkphd/data.html.Google Scholar
Cogan, John F. 2017. The High Cost of Good Intentions: A History of U.S. Federal Entitlement Programs. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Congressional Quarterly. 1950. “Description of Key Votes, 1944–1919.” In CQ Almanac 1949. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.Google Scholar
Converse, Philip. 1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In Ideology and Discontent, edited by Apter, David. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Crawford, Sue E. S., and Ostrom, Elinor. 1995. “A Grammar of Institutions.” The American Political Science Review 89 (3): 582600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croly, Herbert. 1909. The Promise of American Life. Norwood, MA: Norwood Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert. 1957. “Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy Maker.” Journal of Public Law 6 (1): 279295.Google Scholar
Democratic National Convention (DNC). 1840–2016. “National Political Party Platforms.” The American Presidency Project. Accessed January 24, 2019. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/presidential-documents-archive-guidebook/national-political-party-platforms.Google Scholar
Depew, Chauncey. 1896. “Depew on ‘Popocracy.’” The Literary Digest 13 (25): 776777.Google Scholar
Diermeier, Daniel, and Krehbiel, Keith. 2003. “Institutionalism as Methodology.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 15 (2): 123144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiSalvo, Daniel. 2012. Engines of Change: Party Factions in American Politics, 1868–2010. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolbeare, Kenneth M. 1967. “The Public Views the Supreme Court.” In Law, Politics, and the Federal Courts, edited by Jacob, Herbert. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
Donovan, Hedley. 1964. “The Difficulty of ‘Being Fair’ to Goldwater.” Life, September 18: 93–112.Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Dueck, Colin. 2010. Hard Line: The Republican Party and U.S. Foreign Policy since World War II. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Edling, Max. 2014. A Hercules in the Cradle: War, Money, and the American State, 1783–1867. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Eisenhower, Dwight. 1952. “I Shall Go to Korea Speech, October 25, 1952.” Dwight D. Eisenhower Presidential Library. October 25. Accessed May 2, 2017. www.eisenhower.archives.gov/education/bsa/citizenship_merit_badge/speeches_national_historical_importance/i_shall_go_to_korea.pdf.Google Scholar
Elkins, Stanley M., and McKitrick, Eric L.. 1993. The Age of Federalism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, Christopher, and Stimson, James. 2012. Ideology in America. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Richard. 1971. The Jeffersonian Crisis: Courts and Politics in the Young Republic. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, Richard. 2007. Aggressive Nationalism: McCulloch v. Maryland and the Foundation of Federal Authority in the Young Republic. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engel, Stephen. 2011. American Politicians Confront the Court: Opposition Politics and Changing Responses to Judicial Power. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Erikson, Robert S., MacKuen, Michael B., and Stimson, James A.. 2002. The Macro Polity. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Farrand, Max. 1911. The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787. Edited by Farrand, Max. Vol. 1. 3 vols. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris. 2013. “Party Homogeneity and Contentious Politics.” In Can We Talk? The Rise of Rude, Nasty, Stubborn Politics, edited by Shea, Daniel M. and Fiorina, Morris P., 142153. New York: Pearson.Google Scholar
Forcey, Charles B. 1961. The Crossroads of Liberalism: Croly, Weyl, Lippmann, and the Progressive Era, 1900–1925. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fordham, Benjamin O. 2007. “The Evolution of Republican and Democratic Positions on Cold War Military Spending: A Historical Puzzle.” Social Science History 31 (4): 603636.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis. 2018. Identity: The Demand for Dignity and the Politics of Resentment. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
George, Walter F. 1956. “The Southern Manifesto.” Federal Judicial Center. March 12. Accessed June 1, 2015. www.fjc.gov/history/home.nsf/page/tu_bush_doc_6.html.Google Scholar
Gerring, John. 1998. Party Ideologies in America, 1828–1996. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillman, Howard. 1993. The Constitution Besieged. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Gillman, Howard. 2006. “Party Politics and Constitutional Change: The Political Origins of Liberal Judicial Activism.” In The Supreme Court and American Political Development, edited by Kahn, Ronald and Kersch, Ken I.. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Judith, and Keohane, Robert. 1993. Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Graber, Mark. 2000. “The Jacksonian Origins of Chase Court Activism.” Journal of Supreme Court History 25 (1): 1739.Google Scholar
Grassmuck, George. 1951. Sectional Biases in Congress on Foreign Policy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Gries, Peter. 2014. The Politics of American Foreign Policy: How Ideology Divides Liberals and Conservatives. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S., and Pierson, Paul. 2005. Off Center: The Republican Revolution and the Erosion of American Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S., and Pierson, Paul 2014. “After the ‘Master Theory’: Downs, Schattschneider, and the Rebirth of Policy-Focused Analysis.” Perspectives on Politics 12 (3): 643662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Peter A., and Taylor, Rosemary C. R.. 1996. “Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms.” Political Studies XLIV: 936957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Stuart. 1986. “The Problem of Ideology: Marxism Without Guarantees.” Journal of Communication Inquiry 10 (2): 2844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Timothy L. 2001. Supreme Court Justices: A Biographical Dictionary. New York: Facts on File, Inc.Google Scholar
Hare, Christopher, and Poole, Keith T.. 2014. “The Polarization of Contemporary American Politics.” Polity 46: 411429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, Benjamin. 1896. “Ex-President Harrison’s Speech at New York.” In Public Opinion: A Comprehensive Summary of the Press throughout the World on All Important Current Topics, Vol. 21. 297298. New York: The Public Opinion Company.Google Scholar
Hartz, Louis. 1955. The Liberal Tradition in America. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Hattam, Victoria, and Lowndes, Joseph. 2007. “The Ground Beneath our Feet: Language, Culture, and Political Change.” In Formative Acts: American Politics in the Making, edited by Skowronek, Stephen and Glassman, Matthew, 199222. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. 1949. “The Intellectuals and Socialism.” The University of Chicago Law Review 16 (3): 417433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herring, Pendleton. 1940. The Politics of Democracy: American Parties in Action. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
Hetherington, Marc. 2001. “Resurgent Mass Partisanship: The Role of Elite Polarization.” American Political Science Review 95 (3): 619631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinich, Melvin, and Munger, Michael. 1994. Ideology and the Theory of Political Choice. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofstadter, Richard. 1948. The American Political Tradition and the Men Who Made It. New York: A. A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Hofstadter, Richard. 1969. The Idea of a Party System. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holcombe, Arthur N. 1924. The Political Parties of To-Day. New York: Harper & Bros.Google Scholar
Holsti, Ole. 2006. Making American Foreign Policy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Holt, Michael F. 1999. The Rise and Fall of the American Whig Party: Jacksonian Politics and the Onset of the Civil War. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Howell, William. 2013. Thinking about the Presidency: The Primacy of Power. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, William, and Pevehouse, Jon C.. 2007. While Dangers Gather: Congressional Checks on Presidential War Powers. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurwitz, Jon, and Peffley, Mark. 1987. “How Are Foreign Policy Attitudes Structured? A Hierarchical Model.” American Political Science Review 81 (4): 10991120.Google Scholar
Jackson, Andrew. 1832. “Bank Veto (July 10, 1832).” Miller Center. Accessed December 21, 2018. www.millercenter.org/thepresidency/presidential-speeches/july-10-1832-bank-vetoGoogle Scholar
James, Scott C. 2000. Presidents, Parties, and the State: A Party System Perspective on Democratic Regulatory Choice, 1884–1936. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Thomas. 1795/1904. “Notes on Prof. Ebeling’s Letter of July 30, 95.” In The Works of Thomas Jefferson. Vol. 8, edited by Ford, Paul Leicester, 205211. New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Thomas. 1801a/2019. “Inaugural Address.” The American Presidency Project. Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley. March 4. Accessed February 12, 2019. www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=25803.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Thomas. 1801b/1905. “To John Dickinson.” In The Works of Thomas Jefferson. Vol. 9, edited by Ford, Paul Leicester, 280282. New York and London: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Thomas. 1801c/1905. “First Annual Message.” In The Works of Thomas Jefferson. Vol. 9, 321–346. New York and London: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Thomas. 1807/1999. “To Thomas Cooper.” In Jefferson: Political Writings, edited by Appleby, Joyce and Ball, Terrence, 424–425. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Thomas. 1813/2019. “Thomas Jefferson to John Melish, January 13, 1813.” The Library of Congress. Accessed January 1, 2019. https://www.loc.gov/item/mtjbib021292/.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Thomas. 1820/1905. “To William Charles Jarvis.” In The Works of Thomas Jefferson. Vol. 12, edited by Ford, Paul Leicester, 161163. New York and London: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Thomas. 1821/1905. “To James Pleasants.” In The Works of Thomas Jefferson. Vol. 12, edited by Paul Leicester Ford, 213217. New York and London: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Thomas. 1822a/1905. “Letter to Henry Dearborn.” In The Works of Thomas Jefferson. Vol. 12, edited by Paul Leicester Ford, 396. New York and London: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Thomas. 1822b/1905. “To William Johnson.” In The Works of Thomas Jefferson. Vol 12, edited by Ford, Paul Leicester, 213217. New York and London: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Thomas. 1823/2019. “Thomas Jefferson to Marie Joseph Paul Yves Roch Gilbert du Motier, Marquis de Lafayette, November 4, 1823.” The Library of Congress. https://www.loc.gov/resource/mtj1.054_0067_0069/?st=gallery. Accessed January 1, 2019.Google Scholar
John, Richard R. 2003. “Affairs of Office: The Executive Departments, the Election of 1828, and the Making of the Democratic Party.” In The Democratic Experiment: New Directions in American Political History, edited by Jacobs, Meg, Novak, William J., and Zelizer, Julian E., 5084. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kahn, Ronald, and Kersch, Ken. 2006. “Introduction.” In The Supreme Court and American Political Development, edited by Kahn, Ronald and Kersch, Ken, 130. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Karol, David. 2009. Party Position Change in American Politics: Coalition Management. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katznelson, Ira, and Weingast, Barry. 2005. “Intersections between Historical and Rational Choice Institutionalism.” In Preferences and Situations: Intersections between Historical and Rational Choice Institutionalism, edited by Katznelson, Ira and Weingast, Barry, 126. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Keck, Thomas. 2004. The Most Activist Supreme Court in History: The Road to Modern Judicial Conservatism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keck, Thomas. 2007. “Party, Policy, or Duty: Why Does the Supreme Court Invalidate Federal Statutes?American Political Science Review 101 (2): 321338.Google Scholar
Kelley, Robert. 1977. “Ideology and Political Culture from Jefferson to Nixon.” American Historical Review 82 (3): 531562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendall, Willmoore, and Ranney, Austin. 1956. Democracy and the American Party System. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.Google Scholar
Kennedy, David M. 1999. Freedom from Fear: The American People in Depression and War, 1929–1945. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kenworthy, Edwin W. 1968. “Nixon Scores ‘Indulgence’.” New York Times, November 3: 79.Google Scholar
Key, Vladimir O. Jr. 1955. “A Theory of Critical Elections.” Journal of Politics 17 (1): 318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Key, Vladimir O., 1964. Politics, Parties, and Pressure Groups. New York: Crowell.Google Scholar
Keynes, J. M. 1936. A General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kleppner, Paul. 1979. The Third Electoral System, 1853–92: Parties, Voters, and Political Cultures. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Knight, Kathleen. 2006. “Transformations of the Concept of Ideology in the Twentieth Century.” American Political Science Review 100 (4): 619626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolodny, Robin. 1996. “The Several Elections of 1824.” Congress & The Presidency 23: 139164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, Larry. 2007. “‘The Interest of the Man’: James Madison, Popular Constitutionalism, and the Theory of Deliberative Democracy.” Valparaiso University Law Review 41 (2): 697754.Google Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 1991. Information and Legislative Organization. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriner, Douglas. 2014. “Obama’s Authorization Paradox: Syria and Congress’s Continued Relevance in Military Affairs.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 44 (2): 309327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kutler, Stanley. 1968. Judicial Power and Reconstruction Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Labunski, Richard. 1986. “The ‘Dangerous’ Views of Ed Meese.” Chicago Tribune, November 6: C27.Google Scholar
Ladd, Everett C. Jr. 1970. American Political Parties: Social Change and Political Response. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Landon, Alf. 1936. “The Texts of Governor Landon's Addresses at Madison Square Garden and Over the Radio.” New York Times. October 30: 16.Google Scholar
Layman, Geoffrey, and Carsey, Thomas. 2002. “Party Polarization and ‘Conflict Extension’ in the American Electorate.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (4): 786802.Google Scholar
Lee, Frances. 2009. Beyond Ideology: Politics, Principles, and Partisanship in the U.S. Senate. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Frances. 2016. “Patronage, Logrolls and ‘Polarization’: Congressional Parties of the Gilded Age, 1876–1896.” Studies in American Political Development 30 (2): 116127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leighton, Wayne A., and Lopez, Edward J.. 2013. Madmen, Intellectuals, and Academic Scribblers. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Levendusky, Matthew. 2009. The Partisan Sort: How Liberals Became Democrats and Conservatives Became Republicans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Hyrum. 2012. “Historians and the Myth of American Conservatism.” Journal of the Historical Society 12 (1): 2745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Hyrum. 2017. “It’s Time to Retire the Political Spectrum.” Quillette. May 3. Accessed July 12, 2017. http://quillette.com/2017/05/03/time-retire-political-spectrum/.Google Scholar
Lewis, Verlan. 2017. “Why Presidential Candidates (Like Trump) Campaign as Isolationists but (Like Trump) Govern as Hawks.” The Washington Post. April 18. Accessed December 30, 2017. https://wapo.st/2pwxvMa?tid=ss_mail&utm_term=.de357248609d.Google Scholar
Lieber, Robert J. 2014. “Politics Stops at the Water’s Edge? Not Recently.” The Washington Post. February 10. https://wapo.st/1f9hiix?tid=ss_mail&utm_term=.0b4a2669a2cf. Accessed June 6, 2015.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Robert C. 2002. “Ideas, Institutions, and Political Order: Explaining Political Change.” American Political Science Review 96 (4): 697712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lincoln, Abraham. 1858/1953. “Sixth Debate with Stephen A. Douglas, at Quincy, Illinois.” In The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln. Vol. 3, edited by Roy P. Basler. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 245283.Google Scholar
Lincoln, Abraham. 1859/1953. “Letter to Henry L. Pierce and Others.” In The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln. Vol. 3, edited by Roy P. Basler. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 374375.Google Scholar
Lippmann, Walter. 1932. Interpretations, 1931–1932. New York: The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
Lippmann, Walter. 1955. Essays in the Public Philosophy. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
Lowi, Theodore. 1969. The End of Liberalism: Ideology, Policy, and the Crisis of Public Authority. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.Google Scholar
Madison, James. 1792. “A Candid State of the Parties.” National Gazette 1 (95).Google Scholar
Madison, James. 1817/2018. “Veto Message on the Internal Improvements Bill.” Miller Center of Public Affairs. millercenter.org/the-presidency/presidential-speeches/march-3-1817-veto-message-internal-improvements-bill. Accessed December 31, 2018.Google Scholar
Mann, Thomas, and Ornstein, Norman. 2012. It’s Even Worse than It Looks: How the American Constitutional System Collided with the New Politics of Extremism. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Harvey. 2006. “The Law and the President.” Weekly Standard 11 (17).Google Scholar
Mason, Lilliana. 2018. Uncivil Agreement: How Politics Became Our Identity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, Matthew. 2002. “‘Nothing Is Better Calculated to Excite Divisions’: Federalist Agitation against Slave Representation during the War of 1812.” The New England Quarterly 75 (4): 531561.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David. 2002. Electoral Realignments: A Critique of an American Genre. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David. 2005. Divided We Govern: Party Control, Lawmaking and Investigations, 1946–2002. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
McCarty, Nolan, Poole, Keith, and Rosenthal, Howard. 2006. Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
McCloskey, Robert. 1960/2016. The American Supreme Court. 6th edn, edited by Levinson, Sanford. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McCloskey, Robert. 2000. The American Supreme Court. 4th edn, edited by Levinson, Sanford. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McPherson, Alan. 2014. “Herbert Hoover, Occupation Withdrawal, and the Good Neighbor Policy.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 44 (4): 623639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merriam, Charles. 1922. The American Party System: An Introduction to the Study of Political Parties in the United States. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Mettler, Suzanne. 1996. “Review of Political Parties and the State: The American Historical Experience by Martin Shefter.” The Journal of Interdisciplinary History 27 (2): 338340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milkis, Sidney M. 1992. “Programmatic Liberalism and Party Politics: The New Deal Legacy and the Doctrine of Responsible Party Government.” In Challenges to Party Government, edited by White, John Kenneth and Mileur, Jerome M., 104132. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Milkis, Sidney M. 1993. The President and the Parties. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Milkis, Sidney M. 2009. Theodore Roosevelt, the Progressive Party, and the Transformation of American Democracy. Lawrence, KS: Kansas University Press.Google Scholar
Milkis, Sidney M., and Nelson, Michael. 2008. The American Presidency: Origins and Development, 1776–2007. 5th edn. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Minicucci, Stephen. 2004. “Internal Improvements and the Union, 1790–1860.” Studies in American Political Development 18 (2): 160185.Google Scholar
Moe, Terry. 1985. “The Politicized Presidency.” In The New Direction in American Politics, edited by Chubb, John E. and Peterson, Paul E.. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Moe, Terry. 2009. “The Revolution in Presidential Studies.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 39 (4): 701724.Google Scholar
Moe, Terry, and Howell, William. 1999. “Unilateral Action and Presidential Power: A Theory.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 29 (4): 850873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, Gouverneur. 1801/1888. The Diary and Letters of Gouverneur Morris. Vol. 2, edited by Anne Cary Morris. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
Nagel, Stuart. 1965. “Court-Curbing Periods in American History.” Vanderbilt Law Review 18: 925–44.Google Scholar
Nash, George. 2006. The Conservative Intellectual Movement in America since 1945. Wilmington, DE: ISI Books.Google Scholar
Nau, Henry. 2013. Conservative Internationalism: Armed Diplomacy under Jefferson, Polk, Truman, and Reagan. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Neustadt, Richard E. 1960. Presidential Power: The Politics of Leadership. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
New York Times. 1968. “Nixon Said to Bar Southerners’ Bid: Shuns Pledge on Choosing Conservative for Ticket.” New York Times, August 7: 30.Google Scholar
Nixon, Richard. 1968. “Address Accepting the Presidential Nomination at the Republican National Convention in Miami Beach, Florida.” The American Presidency Project. Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley. August 8. Accessed May 30, 2015. www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=25968.Google Scholar
Noel, Hans. 2013. Political Ideologies and Political Parties in America. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Noel, Hans. 2016. “Separating Ideology from Party in Roll Call Data.” hansnoel.com. August 10. Accessed July 16, 2017. http://faculty.georgetown.edu/hcn4/Downloads/Noel_Rollcalls.pdf.Google Scholar
North, Douglass. 1981. Structure and Change in Economic History. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Orren, Karen, and Skowronek, Stephen. 2004. The Search for American Political Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrogorski, Moisey. 1902. Democracy and the Organization of Political Parties. London: Macmillan & Co.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor. 1986. “An Agenda for the Study of Institutions.” Public Choice 4 (1): 325.Google Scholar
Page, Benjamin I., and Bouton, Marshall M.. 2006. The Foreign Policy Disconnect: What Americans Want from Our Leaders but Don’t Get. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Peffley, Mark A., and Hurwitz, Jon. 1985. “A Hierarchical Model of Attitude Constraint.” American Journal of Political Science 29 (4): 871890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennoyer, Slvester. 1895. American Law Review 29: 550558.Google Scholar
Perry, H. W. Jr., and Powe, L. A.. 2004. “The Political Battle for the Constitution.” Constitutional Commentary 21 (3): 641696.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2004. Politics in Time. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul, and Skocpol, Theda. 2007. The Transformation of American Politics: Activist Government and the Rise of Conservatism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pomper, Gerald M. 1968. Elections in America: Control and Influence in American Politics. New York: Dodd, Mead and Company.Google Scholar
Poole, Keith, and Rosenthal, Howard. 1997. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll-Call Voting. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Poole, Keith, and Rosenthal, Howard. 2007. Ideology and Congress. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Poole, Keith, and Rosenthal, Howard. 2015. “Democrat and Republican Party Voting Splits Congresses 35–113.” May 31. Accessed July 1, 2015. voteview.org/partycount.htm.Google Scholar
Poole, Keith, and Rosenthal, Howard. 2015. “The Polarization of Congressional Parties.” March 21. Accessed June 27, 2015. voteview.org/political_polarization_2014.htm.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl. 1974/1992. Unended Quest: An Intellectual Biography. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Powe, Lucas A. 2009. The Supreme Court and the American Elite, 1789–2008. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Publius, . 1787/2003. The Federalist Papers. New York: Signet Classic.Google Scholar
Reichley, James. 2000. The Life of the Parties. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Reiter, Howard L., and Stonecash, Jeffrey. 2011. Counter Realignment: Political Change in the Northeastern United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Remini, Robert. 1959. Martin Van Buren and the Democratic Party. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Remini, Robert. 1963. The Election of Andrew Jackson. Philadelphia: Lipincott.Google Scholar
Remini, Robert. 1972. The Age of Jackson. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Republican National Convention (RNC). 1856–2016. “National Political Party Platforms.” The American Presidency Project. Edited by Peters, Gerhard and Woolley, John T.. Accessed January 24, 2019. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/presidential-documents-archive-guidebook/national-political-party-platforms.Google Scholar
Risjord, Norma K. 1965. The Old Republicans: Southern Conservatism in the Age of Jefferson. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rodrik, Dani. 2014. “When Ideas Trump Interests.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 28 (1): 189208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrik, Dani, and Mukand, Sharun W.. 2016. “Ideas versus Interests: A Unified Political Economy Framework.” April 10. Accessed July 12, 2017. https://drodrik.scholar.harvard.edu/files/dani-rodrik/files/ideasinterestsapr10sm_dr.pdf.Google Scholar
Roosevelt, Franklin D. 1928. “Our Foreign Policy: A Democratic View.” Foreign Affairs 6 (4): 573586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roosevelt, Franklin D.. 1932a. “Address Accepting the Presidential Nomination at the Democratic National Convention in Chicago (July 2, 1932).” The American Presidency Project, edited by Peters, Gerhard and Woolley, John T.. Accessed December 22, 2017. www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=75174.Google Scholar
Roosevelt, Franklin D.. 1932b. “Campaign Address on the Federal Budget at Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (October 19, 1932).” The American Presidency Project, edited by Wooley, John T. and Peters, Gerhard. Accessed January 29, 2014. www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=88399.Google Scholar
Roosevelt, Franklin D.. 1932c. “Radio Address from Albany, New York (April 7, 1932).” The American Presidency Project, edited by John T. Wooley and Gerhard Peters. Accessed February 1, 2018. www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=88408.Google Scholar
Roosevelt, Theodore. 1904a. “Fourth Annual Message (December 6, 1904).” The American Presidency Project, edited by Peters, Gerhard and Wooley, John T.. Accessed June 4, 2015. www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=29545.Google Scholar
Roosevelt, Theodore. 1904b. “Letter to George Otto Trevelyan.” In The Letters of Theodore Roosevelt: The Square Deal, 1901–1903, edited by Morison, Elting E.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Roosevelt, Theodore. 1907. “President a Guest: Makes a Rousing Speech at Commerce Banquet. Stands for Fast Vessels. Says American Merchant Flag Should Fly in South America. Mr. Roosevelt Enthuses Delegates to Trade Extension Convention with a Ringing Speech–Praises Secretary Root’s Work for Nation–Says Monroe Doctrine Is in Interests of Peace and Big Navy Is Insurance Against War.” Washington Post, January 17: 1.Google Scholar
Roosevelt, Theodore. 1912. “Letter to Gifford Pinchot.” The Letters of Theodore Roosevelt. Vol. 7, edited by Morison, Elting Elmore. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Roosevelt, Theodore. 1913. An Autobiography. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
Salisbury, Robert. 1986. “The Republican Party and Positive Government, 1860–1890.” Mid-America: An Historical Review 68: 1534.Google Scholar
Sandel, Michael. 1996. Democracy’s Discontent: America in Search of a Public Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, E. E. 1942. Party Government. New York: Rinehart & Co.Google Scholar
Schickler, Eric. 2013. “New Deal Liberalism and Racial Liberalism in the Mass Public, 1937–1968.” Perspectives on Politics 11: 7598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlesinger, Arthur Jr. 1945. The Age of Jackson. Boston: Little, Brown, and Co.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, Arthur, 1995. “Back to the Womb? Isolationism’s Renewed Threat.” Foreign Affairs 74 (4): 28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A., and Spaeth, Harold J.. 1993. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Semple, Robert. 1968. “Humphrey Links Wallace to Fear.” New York Times, October 2: 1, 27.Google Scholar
Shafer, Byron E. 1991. “The Notion of an Electoral Order: The Structure of Electoral Politics at the Accession of George Bush.” In The End of Realignment? Interpreting American Electoral Eras, edited by Shafer, Byron E., 3784. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Sheingate, Adam. 2003. “Political Entrepreneurship, Institutional Change, and American Political Development.” Studies in American Political Development 17 (2): 185203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth A., and Weingast, Barry R.. 1981. “Structure-Induced Equilibrium and Legislative Choice.” Public Choice 37 (3): 503519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 1992. Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda, and Williamson, Vanessa. 2012. The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican Conservatism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Skowronek, Stephen. 1997. The Politics Presidents Make: Leadership from John Adams to Bill Clinton. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Skowronek, Stephen. 2009. “The Conservative Insurgency and Presidential Power: A Developmental Perspective.” Harvard Law Review 122 (8): 20712103.Google Scholar
Smith, Al. 1936. “The Facts in the Case.” American Liberty League Pamphlets. No. 97. Washington, DC: American Liberty League.Google Scholar
Smith, Rogers. 1993. “Beyond Tocqueville, Myrdal, and Hartz: The Multiple Traditions in America.” American Political Science Review 87 (3): 549566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Rogers. 1995. “Ideas, Institutions, and Strategic Choice.” Polity 28 (1): 135140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Rogers. 1997. Civic Ideals. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sollenberger, Mitchel A. 2014. “Presidential Studies, Behavioralism, and Public Law.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 44 (4): 758778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stathis, Stephen. 2014. Landmark Legislation 1774–2012: Major U.S. Acts and Treaties. Washington, DC: CQ Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephenson, Donald Grier. 1999. Campaigns and the Court: The U.S. Supreme Court in Presidential Elections. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Stevenson, Adlai. 1952. “Text of Stevenson’s Talk at Rochester.” New York Times, October 25: 10.Google Scholar
Stonecash, Jeffrey. 2010. New Directions in American Political Parties. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundquist, James. 1973. Dynamics of the American Party System. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Taft, William. 1895. “Criticisms of the Federal Judiciary.” The American Law Review 29: 641674.Google Scholar
Teles, Steven, and Dagan, David. 2015. “The Social Construction of Policy Feedback: Incarceration, Conservatism, and Ideological Change.” Studies in American Political Development 29 (2): 127153.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de. 1835/2000. Democracy in America. Edited by Mansfield, Harvey and Winthrop, Delba. Translated by Mansfield, Harvey and Winthrop, Delba. Vol. 1. 2 vols. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Treanor, William Michael. 2005. “Judicial Review before ‘Marbury.’” Stanford Law Review 58 (2): 455562.Google Scholar
Tulis, Jeffrey. 1987. The Rhetorical Presidency. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tullock, Gordon. 1981. “Why So Much Stability.” Public Choice 37 (2): 189205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, Frederick Jackson. 1911. “Social Forces in American History.” American Historical Review 16 (2): 217–33.Google Scholar
Urofsky, Melvin. 2006. Biographical Encyclopedia of the Supreme Court: The Lives and Legal Philosophies of the Justices. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Van Buren, Martin. 1822/1875. “Letter to Charles Dudley.” In Legacy of Historical Gleanings. Vol. 1, edited by Bonney, Catharina V. R.. 382. Albany, NY: J. Munsell.Google Scholar
Vandenberg, Arthur H. 1952. The Private Papers of Senator Vandenberg, edited by Vandenberg, Arthur H. Jr. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Volkens, Andrea, Lehmann, Pola, Matthieß, Theres, Merz, Nicolas, Regel, Sven, and Werner, Annika. 2015. “The Manifesto Data Collection.” Manifesto Project (MRG/CMP/MARPOR). Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB).Google Scholar
Waite, Morrison. 1876. “Munn v. State of Illinois, 84 U.S. 113 (1876).” FindLaw. October. Accessed November 17, 2018. http://laws.findlaw.com/us/94/113.html.Google Scholar
Ware, Alan. 2006. The Democratic Party Heads North. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Warren, Charles. 1922. The Supreme Court in United States History. Vol. 1. 3 vols. New York: Little, Brown, and Company.Google Scholar
Warren, Charles. 1922. The Supreme Court in United States History. Vol. 2. 3 vols. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company.Google Scholar
Webster, Daniel. 1836/1902. “To Mrs. Caroline Webster.” In The Letters of Daniel Webster, edited by Van Tyne, C. H. 198–199. New York: McClure, Phillips & Co.Google Scholar
Westin, Alan. 1953. “The Supreme Court, the Populist Movement, and the Campaign of 1896.” Journal of Politics 15 (1): 341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whig National Convention. 1844. “Whig Party Platform of 1844.” The American Presidency Project. Edited by Peters, Gerhard and Woolley, John T.. May 1. Accessed May 20, 2015. www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=25852.Google Scholar
Whig National Convention. 1856. “Whig Party Platform of 1856.” The American Presidency Project. Edited by Peters, Gerhard and Woolley, John T.. September 17. Accessed February 14, 2019. www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/whig-party-platform-1856.Google Scholar
Whittington, Keith E. 2007. The Political Foundations of Judicial Supremacy: The Presidency, the Supreme Court, and Constitutional Leadership in U.S. History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wilentz, Sean. 2005. The Rise of American Democracy: Jefferson to Lincoln. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.Google Scholar
Williams, Samuel. 1794. The Natural and Civil History of Vermont. Walpole, New Hampshire: Isaiah Thomas and David Carlisle, Jun.Google Scholar
Wilson, Woodrow. 1879. “Cabinet Government in the United States.” International Review 7: 146–163.Google Scholar
Wilson, Woodrow. 1885. Congressional Government: A Study in American Politics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Woodrow. 1901. Congressional Government: A Study in American Politics. 15th edn. Boston: Houghton, Mifflin and Company.Google Scholar
Wilson, Woodrow. 1913. “Address before the Southern Commercial Congress in Mobile, Alabama.” The American Presidency Project, edited by Peters, Gerhard and Woolley, John T.. Accessed June 4, 2015. www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=65373.Google Scholar
Wolbrecht, Christina. 2000. The Politics of Women’s Rights: Parties, Positions, and Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wood, Gordon S. 2009. Empire of Liberty: A History of the Early Republic, 1789–1815. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yarbrough, Jean. 2012. Theodore Roosevelt and the American Political Tradition. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Verlan Lewis, Stanford University, California
  • Book: Ideas of Power
  • Online publication: 15 April 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108568852.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Verlan Lewis, Stanford University, California
  • Book: Ideas of Power
  • Online publication: 15 April 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108568852.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Verlan Lewis, Stanford University, California
  • Book: Ideas of Power
  • Online publication: 15 April 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108568852.011
Available formats
×