Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-05T01:26:52.048Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Select Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 May 2024

Abdulkadir Yilmazcan
Abdulkadir Yilmazcan
Affiliation:
The University of Hong Kong
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Improving Procedural Justice in Anti-Dumping Investigations
Lessons from the US and EU Practices Against China
 , pp. 249 - 272
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Secondary Sources

Aggarwal, Aradhna, ‘Trade Effects of Anti-dumping in India: Who Benefits?’, Int’l Trade J. 25, no. 1 (2010), 112–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alam, M. H., ‘Next Steps Might Be Considered by Joe Biden for the Development of International Trade Law’, Eur. J. Eng. Res. Sci. 5, no. 11 (2020), 1372–1375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, Michael, ‘The Facts Available on “Facts Available”: An Analysis of Article 6.8 and Annex II of the WTO Anti-dumping Agreement’, N.Z. J. Public & Int’l L. 6, no. 2 (2008), 11–42.Google Scholar
Aranoff, Shara L., Patel, Sonam and Doggett, Molly J., ‘A Review of the Court of International Trade’s 2015 Decisions Addressing Trade Remedy Determinations of the US International Trade Commission and the Court’s Decisions Pursuant to 28 USC 1581 (i)’, Geo. J. Int’l L. 48 (2016), 7–68.Google Scholar
Areeda, Philip and Turner, Donald F., ‘Predatory Pricing and Related Practices under Section 2 of the Sherman Act’, J. Reprints Antitrust L. & Econ. 6 (1975), 697–733.Google Scholar
d’Aspremont, Claude, Encaoua, David and Ponssard, Jean-Pierre, ‘Competition Policy and Game Theory: Reflections Based on the Cement Industry Case’, in Norman, George (ed.), Market Structure and Competition Policy: Game Theoretical Approaches (Cambridge University Press, 2000), 9–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bacon-Shone, John, Introduction to Quantitative Research Methods (Graduate School, The University of Hong Kong, 2013).Google Scholar
Bagwell, Kyle, Bown, Chad and Staiger, Robert W., ‘Is the WTO Passé?’, J. Econ. Lit. 54, no. 4 (2016), 1125–1231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, Richard, ‘Regulatory Protectionism, Developing Nations and a Two-Tier World Trade System’, in Brookings Trade Forum (Brookings Institution Press, 2000), 237–293.Google Scholar
Baldwin, Richard and Di Mauro, Beatrice W., Economics in the Time of COVID-19: A New eBook (VOX, CEPR Policy Portal, 2020).Google Scholar
Baldwin, Richard and Tomiura, Eiichi, ‘Thinking Ahead about the Trade Impact of COVID-19’, in Baldwin, R. and Weder di Mauro, B. (eds.), Economics in the Time of COVID-19 (CEPR Press, 2020), 59.Google Scholar
Bao, Xiaohua and Qiu, Larry D., ‘Is China’s Antidumping More Retaliatory than That of the US?’, Rev. Int’l Econ. 19, no. 2 (2011), 374–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkworth, Julie M. and Murphy, Kristina, ‘Procedural Justice Policing and Citizen Compliance Behaviour: The Importance of Emotion’, Psychol. Crime & L. 21, no. 3 (2015), 254–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benedetto, John, Gamache, Lauren, Holbein, James and Thomsen, Craig, ‘Summary of the US International Trade Commission Centennial Proceedings’, J. Int’l Com. & Econ. 2017 (2017), 1–23.Google Scholar
Beshkar, Mostafa and Chilton, Adam S., ‘Revisiting Procedure and Precedent in the WTO: An Analysis of US–Countervailing and Anti-dumping Measures (China)’, World Trade Rev. 15, no. 2 (2016), 375–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bi, Ying, ‘Is Dumping Still Harmful? New Thinking on Anti-dumping in the Global Free Trade’, JE Asia & Int’l L. 6 (2013), 29–51.Google Scholar
Bork, Robert H., The Antitrust Paradox (Basic Books, 1978).Google Scholar
Bouët, Antonie and Métivier, Jeanne, ‘Is the Dispute Settlement System, “Jewel in the WTO’s Crown”, beyond Reach of Developing Countries?’, Rev. World Econ. 156 (2020), 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bown, Chad P., ‘The 2018 Trade War and the End of Dispute Settlement as We Knew It’, in Crowley, Meredith A. (ed.), Trade War: The Clash of Economic Systems Endangering Global Prosperity (CEPR Press, 2019), 21–32.Google Scholar
Bown, Chad P., ‘The 2018 US–China Trade Conflict after 40 Years of Special Protection.’ Chin. Econ. J. 12, no. 2 (2019), 109–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bown, Chad P., ‘Antidumping and Other Trade Disputes’, in Fan, Shenggen, Ravi, Kanbur, Wei, Shang-Jin and Zhang, Xiaobo (eds.), The Oxford Companion to the Economics of China (Oxford University Press, 2014), 114–119.Google Scholar
Bown, Chad P., Hoekman, Bernard and Ozden, Caglar, ‘The Pattern of US Antidumping: The Path from Initial Filing to WTO Dispute Settlement’, World Trade Rev. 2, no. 3 (2003), 349–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brander, James and Krugman, Paul, ‘A “Reciprocal Dumping” Model of International Trade’, J. Int’l Econ. 15, nos. 3–4 (1983), 320–321.Google Scholar
Brander, James and Spencer, Barbara, ‘Tariff Protection and Imperfect Competition’, in Grossman, G. M. (ed.), Imperfect Competition and International Trade (MIT Press, 1992), 107–119.Google Scholar
Brewster, Rachel, ‘The Remedy Gap: Institutional Design, Retaliation, and Trade Law Enforcement’, Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 80, no. 1 (2011), 102–158. Accessed 17 June 2023, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2146121.Google Scholar
Broncken, Marco and Natalie, McNelis, ‘Rethinking the “Like Product” Definition in WTO Antidumping Law’, J. World Trade 33, no. 3 (1999), 73–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, Stephen G. and Wohlforth, William C., ‘The Once and Future Superpower: Why China Won’t Overtake the United States’, Foreign Aff. 95 (2016), 91–104.Google Scholar
Bruton, Samuel V., ‘Teaching the Golden Rule’, J. Bus. Ethics 49, no. 2 (2004), 179–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busch, Marc L., Reinhardt, Eric and Shaffer, Gregory, ‘Does Legal Capacity Matter? A Survey of WTO Members’, World Trade Rev. 8, no. 4 (2009), 559–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cane, Peter and Kritzer, Herbert, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research (Oxford University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cann, Wesley A., ‘Internationalizing Our Views toward Recoupment and Market Power: Attacking the Anti-dumping/Antitrust Dichotomy through WTO-Consistent Global Welfare Theory’, U. Pa. J. Int’l Econ. L. 17 (1996), 69–231.Google Scholar
Carmody, Chios, ‘A Theory of WTO Law’, J. Int’l Econ. L. 11, no. 3 (2008), 527–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaisse, Julien and Debashis, Chakraborty, ‘Normative Obsolescence of the WTO Anti-dumping Agreement: Topography of the Global Use and Misuse of Initiations and Measures’, Asian J. Int’l L. 6, no. 2 (2016), 233–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, Kam C. and Fung, Hung-gay, eds., China’s Capital Markets: Challenges from WTO Membership (Edward Elgar, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chemerinsky, Erwin, Constitutional Law (Aspen, 2019).Google Scholar
Chen, Chien-Hsun, Mai, Chao-Cheng and Yu, Hui-Chuan, ‘The Effect of Export Tax Rebates on Export Performance: Theory and Evidence from China’, China Econ. Rev. 17, no. 2 (2006), 226–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Yusong, ‘Laws and Implementation in China: A 16 Years Review after Accession to the WTO’, in Bungenberg, Marc, Hahn, Michael, Herrmann, Christoph and Müller-Ibold, Till (eds.), The Future of Trade Defence Instruments (Springer, 2018), 283–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, Wenting and Drahos, Peter, ‘How China Built the World’s Biggest Patent Office: The Pressure Driving Mechanism’, Int. Rev. Intellect. Prop. Compet. L. 49, no. 1 (2018), 5–40.Google Scholar
Chilton, Adam S. and Davis, Ryan W., ‘Equality, Procedural Justice, and the World Trade Organization’, Intercultural Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 7 (2012), 277–327.Google Scholar
Cho, Sungjoon, ‘No More Zeroing?: The United States Changes Its Antidumping Policy to Comply with the WTO’, Am. Soc’y Int’l L. 16, no. 8 (2012).Google Scholar
Choi, Won-mog, ‘People’s Republic of China’s Proposals for Anti-dumping in WTO/DDA Rules Negotiations’, Asian J. WTO & Int’l Health L & Pol’y 2 (2007), 25–64.Google Scholar
Chunhui, Liu, Yao, Lee J., Hu, Nan and Liu, Ling, ‘The Impact of IFRS on Accounting Quality in a Regulated Market: An Empirical Study of China’, J. Account. Audit. & Finance 26, no. 4 (2011), 659–676.Google Scholar
Colantone, Italo and Stanig, Piero, ‘The Trade Origins of Economic Nationalism: Import Competition and Voting Behavior in Western Europe’, Am. J. Pol. Sci. 62, no. 4 (2018), 936–953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, Graham, ‘Confidentiality and Transparency in the WTO’s Party-Centric Dispute Settlement System’, in Huerta-Goldman, J. and Molina-Tejeda, Marco Tulio (eds.), Practical Aspects of WTO Litigation (Wolters Kluwer, 2019), 1–23.Google Scholar
Corr, Christopher F., ‘Trade Protection in the New Millennium: The Ascendancy of Anti-dumping Measures’, Nw. J. Int’l L. & Bus. 18 (1997), 49-110.Google Scholar
Croley, Steven P. and Jackson, Jack H., ‘WTO Dispute Procedures, Standard of Review, and Deference to National Governments’, Am. J. Int’l Law 90, no. 2 (1996), 193–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Czako, Judith, Johann, Human and Jorge, Miranda, A Handbook on Anti-Dumping Investigations (Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Daly, Gemma, ‘Should Truth Commissions Be Viewed as Second-Best Alternatives to Prosecutions’, SOAS L.J. 2 (2015) 176.Google Scholar
Dani, Rodrik, ‘Has Globalization Gone Too Far?’, Challenge 41, no. 2 (1998), 81–94.Google Scholar
Davey, William J., ‘The WTO and Rules-Based Dispute Settlement: Historical Evolution, Operational Success, and Future Challenges’, J. Int’l Econ. L. 17, no. 3 (2014), 679–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deardorff, Alan V., ‘Economic Perspectives on Dumping Law’, in Jackson, John H. and Vermulst, Edwin A. (eds.), Anti-dumping Law and Practice: A Comparative Study (The University of Michigan Press, 1989), 23–39.Google Scholar
Debroy, Bibek and Debashis, Chakraborty, eds., Anti-Dumping: Global Abuse of a Trade Policy Instrument (Academic Foundation, 2007).Google Scholar
Dent, Christopher M., ‘Brexit, Trump and Trade: Back to a Late Nineteenth Century Future?’, Compet. Change 24, nos. 3–4 (2020), 338–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denton, Ross, “(Why) Should Nations Utilize Anti-dumping Measures?’, Mich. J. Int’l L. 11 (1989), 224-272.Google Scholar
Fuchs, Richard, Alexander, Peter, Calum, Brown, Cossar, Frances, Henry, Roslyn C. and Rounsevell, Mark, ‘Why the US–China Trade War Spells Disaster for the Amazon’, Nature 567, no. 7749 (2019), 451–454.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edlin, Aeron S., ‘Stopping Above-Cost Predatory Pricing’, Yale L. J. 111, no. 4 (2002), 941–991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Effron, Robin J., ‘Reason Giving and Rule Making in Procedural Law’, Ala. L. Rev. 65 (2013), 683–733.Google Scholar
Ehlermann, Claus-Dieter and Lockhart, Nicolas, ‘Standard of Review in WTO Law’, J. Int’l Econ. Law 7, no. 3 (2004), 491–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endriss, Ulle, ‘Logic and Social Choice Theory’, Log. Philos. Today 2 (2011), 2–38.Google Scholar
Erixon, Fredrik, ‘Anti-dumping in the European Union’, in Debroy, B. and Chakraborty, Debashis (eds.), Anti-Dumping: Global Abuse of a Trade Policy Instrument (Academic Foundation, 2007), 139–142.Google Scholar
Ezzamel, Mahmoud and Xiao, Jason Zezhong, ‘The Development of Accounting Regulations for Foreign Invested Firms in China: The Role of Chinese Characteristics’, Account. Organ. Soc. 44 (2015), 60–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falkner, Robert, International Political Economy (University of London Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Fan, Shenggen, Ravi, Kanbur, Wei, Shang-Jin and Zhang, Xiaobo, eds., The Oxford Companion to the Economics of China (Oxford University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feenstra, Robert C., Advanced International Trade: Theory and Evidence (Princeton University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Feinberg, Robert M. and Reynolds, Kara M., ‘How Do Countries Respond to Anti‐dumping Filings? Dispute Settlement and Retaliatory Anti‐dumping’, World Econ. 41, no. 5 (2018), 1251–1268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Thiemo and Schwarz, Carlo, ‘Tariffs and Politics: Evidence from Trump’s Trade Wars’, Econ. J. 131, no. 636 (2021), 1717–1741.Google Scholar
Fontanelli, Filippo and Busco, Paolo, ‘The Function of Procedural Justice in International Adjudication’, Law Pract. Internat’l Court. Trib. 15, no. 1 (2016), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Eleanor M., ‘Competition Law and the Agenda for the WTO: Forging the Links of Competition and Trade’, Pac. Rim L. & Pol’y J. 4 (1995), 1.Google Scholar
Francois, Joseph, ‘Subsidies and Countervailing Measures: Determining the Benefits of Subsidies’ in Bagwell, Kyle W., Bermann, George A. and Mavroidis, Petros C. (eds.), Law and Economics of Contingent Protection in International Trade (Cambridge University Press, 2009), 113–115.Google Scholar
Fusch, Patricia I. and Ness, Lawrence R., ‘Are We There Yet? Data Saturation in Qualitative Research’, Qual. Rep. 20, no. 9 (2015), 1408–1416.Google Scholar
Gaffney, John P., ‘Due Process in the World Trade Organization: The Need for Procedural Justice in the Dispute Settlement System’, Am. U. Int’l L. Rev. 14 (1998), 1179–1221.Google Scholar
Gallo, Andres, ‘Trade Policy and Protectionism in Argentina’, Econ. Affairs 32, no. 1 (2012), 55–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gambardella, Maurizio, ‘Transparency in EU Antidumping Investigations: The European Ombudsman Perspective’, Glob. Trade Cust. J. 6, no. 3 (2011), 157–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garner, Bryan A., Black’s Law Dictionary (West Group, 1999).Google Scholar
Garrity-Rokous, Gates and Brescia, Raymond H., ‘Procedural Justice and International Human Rights: Towards a Procedural Jurisprudence for Human Rights Tribunals’, Yale J. Int’l L. 18 (1993), 559–603.Google Scholar
Gaudin, Germain and Mantzari, Despoina, ‘Margin Squeeze: An Above-Cost Predatory Pricing Approach’, J. Comp. L. & Econ. 12, no. 1 (2016), 151–179.Google Scholar
Gong, Xun and Corinne, Cortese, ‘A Socialist Market Economy with Chinese Characteristics: The Accounting Annual Report of China Mobile’, Account. Forum 41, no. 3 (2017), 206–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Andrew and Trebilcock, Michael, ‘Enforcing WTO Obligations: What Can We Learn from Export Subsidies?’, J. Int’l Econ. Law 10, no. 3 (2007), 653–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guest, Greg, Bunce, Arwen and Johnson, Laura, ‘How Many Interviews Are Enough? An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability’, Field Methods 18, no. 1 (2006), 59–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gwartney, James D., Stroup, Richard L., Sobel, Russel S. and Macpherson, David A., Economics: Private and Public Choice (Cengage Learning, 2016).Google Scholar
Halverson, Karen, ‘China’s WTO Accession: Economic, Legal, and Political Implications’, BC Int’l & Comp. L. Rev. 27 (2004), 319–370.Google Scholar
Han, Baoqing, ‘Analyzing China’s Litigation Costs in the WTO: Problems and Solutions’, J. WTO China 3, no. 4 (2013), 119–128.Google Scholar
Hannah, Erin, Scott, James and Wilkinson, Rorden, ‘The WTO in Buenos Aires: The Outcome and Its Significance for the Future of the Multilateral Trading System’, World Econ. 41, no. 10 (2018), 2578–2598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartman, Stephen W., ‘The WTO, the Doha Round Impasse, PTAs, and FTAs/RTAs’, Int’l Trade J. 27, no. 5 (2013), 411–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, Janice E., ‘The Practical Utility and Suitability of Email Interviews in Qualitative Research’, Qual. Rep. 23, no. 2 (2018), 493–501.Google Scholar
Hoekman, Bernard M. and Kostecki, Michael M., The Political Economy of the World Trading System: The WTO and Beyond (Oxford University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoekman, Bernard M. and Mavroidis, Petros C., World Trade Organization (WTO): Law, Economics, and Politics (Routledge, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollander-Blumoff, Rebecca and Tyler, Tom R., ‘Procedural Justice and the Rule of Law: Fostering Legitimacy in Alternative Dispute Resolution’, J. Disp. Resol. 1, no. 1 (2011), 1–20.Google Scholar
Horlick, Gary, ‘Ten Major Problems with the Anti-Dumping Instrument in the United States’, J. World Trade 39, no. 1 (2005), 169–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horlick, Gary and Vermulst, Edwin, ‘Ten Major Problems with the Anti-Dumping Instrument: An Attempt at Synthesis’, J. World Trade 39 (2005), 67–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hovenkamp, Herbert, ‘The Areeda–Turner Test for Exclusionary Pricing: A Critical Journal’, Rev. Indust. Org. 46, no. 3 (2015), 209–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howse, Robert and Michael, Trebilcock, The Regulation of International Trade (Routledge, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hua, Xiuping, Jiang, Ying, Sun, Qian and Xing, Xinyi. ‘Do Antidumping Measures Affect Chinese Export-Related Firms?’, Rev. Quant. Finance Account. 52 (2019), 891–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudec, Robert E., ‘Differences in National Environmental Standards: The Level-Playing-Field Dimension’, Minn. J. Global Trade 5 (1996), 1–28.Google Scholar
Hutton, Susan and Trebilcock, Michael, ‘An Empirical Study of the Application of Canadian Anti-Dumping Laws: A Search for Normative Rationales,’ J. World Trade 24 (1990), 123–146.Google Scholar
Jensen, Bradford J., Quinn, Dennis P. and Weymouth, Stephen, ‘The Influence of Firm Global Supply Chains and Foreign Currency Undervaluations on US Trade Disputes’, Int’l Org. 69, no. 4 (2015), 913–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kazeki, Jun, ‘Anti-dumping Negotiations under the WTO and FANs’, J. World Trade 44, no. 5 (2010), 931–965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, D. and Stiglitz, Joseph E., eds., Law and Economics with Chinese Characteristics: Institutions for Promoting Development in the Twenty-First Century (Oxford University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr, William A., ‘Dumping–One of Those Economic Myths’, Estey Centre J. Int’l L. Trade Pol’y 2, no. 2 (2001), 211–220.Google Scholar
Khan, Owais Hasan, ‘Interface between Antidumping and Competition Law: A Critical Analysis’, Interface 123 (2016), 123–138.Google Scholar
Kissinger, Henry, On China (Penguin Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Krishna, Raj, Anti-Dumping in Law and Practice (The World Bank, The World Bank E-Library, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroeber, Arthur R., China’s Economy: What Everyone Needs to Know (Oxford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Kwok, Kelvin, ‘The New Hong Kong Competition Law: Anomalies and Challenges’, World Comp. 37, no. 4 (2014), 541–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kyounghwa, Kim and Ahn, Dukgeun, ‘To Be or Not to Be with Targeted Dumping’, J. Int’l Econ. L.21, no. 3 (2018), 567–598.Google Scholar
Lai, Chung-Fu and Lee, Xi-Tsz, ‘The Effects of Anti-Dumping Duties in a New Open Economy Macroeconomics Model’, Int’l J. Econ. Fin. Issues 6, no. 3 (2016), 837–844.Google Scholar
Lai, Edwin, ‘The US–China Trade War, the American Public Opinions and Its Effects on China’, Econ. Pol. Stud. 7, no. 2 (2019), 169–184.Google Scholar
Langlois, John D., ‘The WTO and China’s Financial System’, China Quart. 167 (2001), 610–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leclerc, Jean-Mark, ‘Reforming Anti-dumping Law: Balancing the Interests of Consumers and Domestic Industries’, McGill L.J. 44 (1998), 111–140.Google Scholar
Lee, Pierce, ‘Rethinking the Rhetoric of Anti-dumping: A Response to Mark Wu’s Reform Proposal’, Ga. J. Int’l & Comp. L. 42 (2013), 459–488.Google Scholar
Lehne, Jens, Crisis at the WTO: Is the Blocking of Appointments to the WTO Appellate Body by the United States Legally Justified? (Carl Grossmann Verlag, 2019).Google Scholar
Lekfuangfu, Nam-Ake, ‘Rethinking the WTO Anti-Dumping Agreement from a Fairness Perspective’, Cambridge Student L. Rev. 4 (2008), 300.Google Scholar
Lenway, Stefanie, Randall, Morck and Bernard, Yeung, ‘Rent Seeking, Protectionism and Innovation in the American Steel Industry’, Econ. J. 106 (1996), 410–421.Google Scholar
Liu, Hongsong, ‘China’s Proposing Behavior in Global Governance: The Cases of the WTO Doha Round Negotiation and G-20 Process’, Rev. Bras. Polít. Int. 57, no. SPE (2014), 121–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Tao and Woo, Wing Thye, ‘Understanding the US–China Trade War’, China Econ. J. 11, no. 3 (2018), 319–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Xuepeng and Shi, Huimin, ‘Anti‐dumping Duty Circumvention through Trade Rerouting: Evidence from Chinese Exporters’, World Econ. 42, no. 5 (2019), 1427–1466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lichtman, Marilyn, Qualitative Research for the Social Sciences (SAGE Publications, 2013).Google Scholar
Lindsey, Brink and Daniel, Ikenson, Antidumping 101: The Devilish Details of ‘Unfair Trade’ Law (Center for Trade Policy Studies, Cato Institute, 2002).Google Scholar
Lindsey, Brink and Daniel, Ikenson, ‘The Rhetoric and Reality of US Anti-dumping Law’, in Debroy, Bibek and Chakraborty, Debashis (eds.), Anti-dumping: Global Abuse of a Trade Policy Instrument (Academic Foundation, 2007), 101–118.Google Scholar
Lo, Chung-fa, ‘A Proper Balance between WTO’s Members-Driven Nature and the Appellate Body’s Role as an Adjudicator: Careful Exercise of Judicial Activism’, in Lo, Chang-fa, Nakagawa, Junji and Chen, Tsai-fang (eds.), The Appellate Body of the WTO and Its Reform (Springer, 2020), 125–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, Yi, ‘Exploring Aggressive Legalism: Is Now a Good Time to Promote This Approach in Greater Asia?’, Asian J. L. Econ. 6, no. 1 (2015), 85–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, Yan, Anti-dumping in the WTO, the EU, and China: The Rise of Legalization in the Trade Regime and Its Consequences, Vol. 69 (Kluwer Law International BV, 2010).Google Scholar
Lynn, Preece S. and McMillan, Bart M., ‘Free Trade Does Not Equal Freedom from Red Tape: Practitioner Thoughts on FTAA Rules of Origin’, Int’l L. Rev. 1 (2003), 159.Google Scholar
Malawer, Stuart S., ‘Biden, National Security, Law & Global Trade: Less Subterfuge & More Strategy in the New Era of Crisis’, China WTO Rev. 7, no. 1 (2021), 185–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margolis, Stephen E., ‘Two Definitions of Efficiency in Law and Economics’, J. Legal Stud. 16, no. 2 (1987), 471–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, Sarah J., ‘Creating Barriers for Foreign Competitors: A Study of the Impact of Anti‐dumping Actions on the Performance of US Firms’, Strateg. Manag. J. 19, no. 1 (1998), 25–37.3.0.CO;2-C>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Antoine and Bryan, Mercurio, ‘Doha Dead and Buried in Nairobi: Lessons for the WTO’, J. Int’l Trade L. Pol’y 16, no. 1 (2017), 49–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martyn, Taylor D., International Competition Law: A New Dimension for the WTO? (Cambridge University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Matsushita, Mitsuo, ‘Basic Principles of the WTO and the Role of Competition Policy’, Wash. U. Global Stud. L. Rev. 3 (2004), 363–385.Google Scholar
Matsushita, Mitsuo, Schoenbaum, Thomas J., Mavroidis, Petros C. and Hahn, Michael, The World Trade Organization: Law, Practice, and Policy (Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Mavroidis, Petros C., Messerlin, Patrick A. and Wauters, Jasper M., The Law and Economics of Contingent Protection in the WTO (Edward Elgar, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mavroidis, Petros C. and Prusa, Thomas J., ‘Die Another Day: Zeroing in on Targeted Dumping: Did the AB Hit the Mark in US–Washing Machines?’, World Trade Rev. 17, no. 2 (2018), 239–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maxwell, Joseph A., ‘Using Qualitative Methods for Causal Explanation’, Field Methods 16, no. 3 (2004), 243–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messerlin, Patrick A., ‘Anti‐Dumping Regulations or Pro‐Cartel Law? The EC Chemical Cases’, World Econ. 13, no. 4 (1990), 465–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messerlin, Patrick A., ‘China in the World Trade Organization: Antidumping and Safeguards’, World Bank Econ. Rev. 18, no. 1 (2004), 105–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miranda, Jorge, ‘Implementation of the ‘Shift in Burden of Proof’ Approach to Interpreting Paragraph 15 of China’s Protocol of Accession’, Glob. Trade Cust. J. 11, no. 10 (2016), 447–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Andrew D., Sornarajah, Muthucumaraswamy and Tania, Voon, eds., Good Faith and International Economic Law (Oxford University Press, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mokrov, Gennady, Kamanina, Raisa V., Pavlova, Valentina V., Isaeva, Katerina V. and Bashkatov, Leonid D., ‘Antidumping Investigation: Calculation of the Dumping Margin’, Indian J. Sci. Technol. 9, no. 42 (2016), 104276, 1-11.Google Scholar
Moore, O. Michael, ‘US Facts–Available Antidumping Decisions: An Empirical Analysis’, Eur. J. Pol. Econ. 22, no. 3 (2006), 639–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, O. Michael and Maurizio, Zanardi, ‘Does Anti-dumping Use Contribute to Trade Liberalization in Developing Countries?’, Can. J. Econ./Rev. Can. d’Econ. 42, no. 2 (2009), 469–495.Google Scholar
Morgan, Clarisse, ‘Competition Policy and Anti-Dumping’, J. World Trade 30 (1996), 61–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niels, Gunnar and Kate, Adriaan T., ‘Anti‐dumping Protection in a Liberalising Country: Mexico’s Anti‐dumping Policy and Practice’, World Econ. 27, no. 7 (2004), 967–983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, Ulff-Moller Jorgen and Svendsen, Gert Tinggaard, ‘EU Lobbying and Anti-dumping Policy’, J. World Trade 46 (2012), 187–211.Google Scholar
Oesch, Matthias, ‘Standards of Review in WTO Panel Proceedings’, J. Int’l Econ. L. 6, no. 3 (2005), 635–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauwelyn, Joost, ‘WTO Dispute Settlement Post 2019: What to Expect?’, J. Int’l Econ. L. 22, no. 3 (2019), 297–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersmann, Ernst U., ‘The 2018 Trade Wars as a Threat to the World Trading System and Constitutional Democracies’, Trade L. & Dev. 10 (2018), 179–225.Google Scholar
Porter, Michael, Competitive Advantage of Nations: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance, Vol. 2. (Simon & Schuster, 2011).Google Scholar
Prost, Oliver, ‘Confidentiality Issues under the DSU: Fact-finding Process versus Confidentiality’, in Yerxa, Rufus and Wilson, Bruce (eds.), Key Issues in WTO Dispute Settlement (Cambridge University Press, 2005), 190–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prusa, Thomas J., ‘Anti‐dumping: A Growing Problem in International Trade’, World Econ. 28, no. 5 (2005), 683–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prusa, Thomas J. and Vermulst, Edwin, ‘United States – Certain Methodologies and Their Application to Anti-Dumping Proceedings Involving China: Nails in the Coffin of Unfair Dumping Margin Calculation Methodologies’, World Trade Rev. 18, no. 2 (2019), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prusa, Thomas J. and Vermulst, Edwin, ‘United States – Continued Existence and Application of Zeroing Methodology: The End of Zeroing?’, World Trade Rev. 10, no. 1 (2011), 45–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qin, Julia Ya, ‘China, India, and the Law of the World Trade Organization’, Asian J. Comp. L. 3 (2008), 1–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qin, Julia Ya, ‘Trade, Investment and Beyond: The Impact of WTO Accession on China’s Legal System’, in Keller, Perry (ed.), Law and the Market Economy in China (Routledge, 2017), 720–741.Google Scholar
Quartner, David, ‘Public Choice Theory, Protectionism and the Case of NAFTA’, Econ. Aff. 26, no. 1 (2006), 59–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raju, K. D., ‘India’s Involvement in Anti-Dumping Cases in the First Decade of WTO’, in Debroy, Dibek and Chakraborty, Debahsis (eds.), Anti-Dumping: Global Abuse of a Trade Policy Instrument (Academic Foundation, 2007), 31–47.Google Scholar
Ramírez, Rafael S. Espinosa, ‘Reciprocal Dumping and Environmental Polices’, Panor. Econ. 3, no. 6 (2017), 7–33.Google Scholar
Reich, Arie, ‘The Effectiveness of the WTO Dispute Settlement System: A Statistical Analysis’, in Kono, Toshiyuki, Hiscock, Mary and Reich, Arie (eds.), Transnational Commercial and Consumer Law (Springer, 2018), 1–43.Google Scholar
Resnick, David, ‘Due Process and Procedural Justice’, NOMOS Am. Soc’y Pol. Legal Phil. 18 (1977), 206–228.Google Scholar
Rodrik, Dani, ‘Political Economy of Trade Policy’, in Grossman, G. M. and Rogoff, Kenneth (eds.), Handbook of International Economics, Vol. 3 (Elsevier Science BV, 1995), 1457–1494.Google Scholar
Romano, Alessandro and Thammapitagkul, Peachya, ‘Anti-dumping: A Public Interest Not So Much in the Public Interest’, Manchester J. Int’l Econ. L. 10 (2013), 59–77.Google Scholar
Rovegno, Laura, ‘Trade Protection and Market Power: Evidence from US Anti-Dumping and Countervailing Duties’, Rev. World Econ. 149, no. 3 (2013), 443–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruttley, Philip R., Macvay, Iain and Weisberger, Mark, Due Process in WTO Dispute Settlement (Cameron May, 2001).Google Scholar
Schneider, Andrea K., ‘Not Quite a World without Trials: Why International Dispute Resolution Is Increasingly Judicialized’, J. Disp. Resol. 2006 (2006), 119–129.Google Scholar
Seo Dong, Woo, ‘Material Retardation Standard in the US Anti-dumping Law’, Law & Pol’y Int’l Bus. 24 (1992), 835–914.Google Scholar
Shadikhodjaev, Sherzod, ‘Non-Market Economies, Significant Market Distortions, and the 2017 EU Anti-Dumping Amendment’, J. Int’l Econ. L. 21, no. 4 (2018), 885–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, Rajesh, WTO Appellate Body at Cross Roads: Options and Alternatives, in Lo, Chang-fa, Nakagawa, Junji and Chen, Tsai-fang (eds.), The Appellate Body of the WTO and Its Reform (Springer, 2020), 239–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slater, Valerie A. and Ross, Lisa W., ‘Judicial Review of the International Trade Commission’s Determinations in Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: An Overview of Decisions in 2006’, Geo. J. Int’l L. 39 (2007), 69.Google Scholar
Smith, Stephen C. and Pan, Yao, ‘US–China Economic Relations’, in Fan, Shenggen, Ravi, Kanbur, Wei, Shang-Jin and Zhang, Xiaobo (eds.), The Oxford Companion to the Economics of China (Oxford University Press, 2014), 119–124.Google Scholar
Solum, Lawrence B., ‘Procedural Justice’, S. Cal. L. Rev. 78 (2004), 181–320.Google Scholar
Spamann, Holger, ‘Standard of Review for World Trade Organization Panels in Trade Remedy Cases: A Critical Analysis’, J. World Trade 38 (2004), 509–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stancil, Paul, ‘Substantive Equality and Procedural Justice’, Iowa L. Rev. 102 (2016), 1635–1690.Google Scholar
Steinbach, Armin, ‘Price Undertakings in EU Anti-dumping Proceedings – An Instrument of the Past?’, J. Econ. Integr. 29, no. 1 (2014), 165–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinbock, Dan, ‘US–China Trade War and Its Global Impacts’, China Q. Int. Strateg. Stud. 4, no. 4 (2018), 515–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stemler, Steve, ‘An Overview of Content Analysis’, Pract. Assess. Res. Eval. 7, no. 17 (2001), 137–146.Google Scholar
Stewart, TerenceP., ‘US–Japan Economic Disputes: The Role of Anti-Dumping and Countervailing Duty Laws’, Ariz. J. Int’l & Comp. L. 16 (1999), 689–750.Google Scholar
Sun, Shuwei, Zhao, Hailong, He, Xianjie and Zhang, Ying, ‘The Impact of Accounting Standards Convergence on Chinese Firms’ Overseas Mergers and Acquisitions’, China J. Account. Res. 12, no. 3 (2019), 231–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suranovic, M. Steven, ‘A Positive Analysis of Fairness with Applications to International Trade’, World Econ. 23, no. 3 (2000), 283–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sykes, Alan O., ‘Regulatory Protectionism and the Law of International Trade’, Univ. Chi. L. Rev. 66 (1999), 1–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Telep, Jeffrey M. and Lutz, Richard C., ‘China’s Long Road to Market Economy Status’, Geo. J. Int’l L. 49 (2017), 693–708.Google Scholar
Tharakan, P. K. Mathew, ‘Is Anti‐Dumping Here to Stay?’, World Econ. 22, no. 2 (1999), 179–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trommer, Silke Melanie, ‘Special Market Economy: Undermining the Principles of the WTO?’, Chin. J. Int’l L. 6, no. 3 (2007), 565–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, Tom R., ‘What Is Procedural Justice? Criteria Used by Citizens to Assess the Fairness of Legal Procedures’, Law & Soc’y Rev. 22 (1988), 103–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Updegraff, Ragan, ‘Striking a Balance between Necessity and Fairness: The Use of Adverse Facts Available in Dumping and Subsidies Investigations’, Geo. J. Int’l L. 49 (2017), 710–787.Google Scholar
Van Bael, Ivo and Bellis, Jean-François, EU Anti-Dumping and Other Trade Defence Instruments (Kluwer Law International, 2011).Google Scholar
Van den Bossche, Peter and Denise, Prévost, ‘Rules on Unfair Trade’, in Van den Bossche, Peter and Prévost, Denise (eds.), Essentials of WTO Law (Cambridge University Press, 2016), 141–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van den Bossche, Peter and Zdouc, Werner, The Law and Policy of the World Trade Organization: Text, Cases and Materials (Cambridge University Press, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermulst, Edwin, ‘Ten Major Problems with the Anti-Dumping Instrument in the European Community’, J. World Trade 39 (2005), 67–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermulst, Edwin and Daniel, Ikenson, ‘Zeroing under the WTO Anti-Dumping Agreement: Where Do We Stand?’, Glob. Trade Cust. J. 2, no. 6 (2007), 231–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermulst, Edwin and Gatta, Brian, ‘Concurrent Trade Defense Investigations in the EU, the EU’s New Anti-Subsidy Practice against China, and the Future of Both’, World Trade Rev. 11 (2012), 527–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermulst, Edwin and Sud, Juhi Dion, ‘The New Rules Adopted by the European Union to Address “Significant Distortions” in the Anti-Dumping Context’, in Bungenberg, Marc, Hahn, Michael, Herrmann, Christoph and Müller-Ibold, Till (eds.), The Future of Trade Defence Instruments (Springer, 2018), 63–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viner, Jacob, ‘The Prevalence of Dumping in International Trade: I’, J. Pol. Econ. 30, no. 5 (1922), 655–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viner, Jacob, ‘The Prevalence of Dumping in International Trade: II’, J. Pol. Econ. 30, no. 6 (1922), 796–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voon, Tania, ‘Eliminating Trade Remedies from the WTO: Lessons from Regional Trade Agreements’, Int’l & Comp. L. Q. 59, no. 3 (2010), 625–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, Markus, ‘The Impending Demise of the WTO Appellate Body: From Centrepiece to Historical Relic?’, in Lo, Chang-fa, Nakagawa, Junji and Chen, Tsai-fang (eds.), The Appellate Body of the WTO and Its Reform (Springer, 2020), 67–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Xiaosong, Hou, Jack and Lin, Faqin, ‘ITC Antidumping toward China Rulings: Is Political Factor Overwhelming?’, Bull. Econ. Res. 74, no. 1 (2021), 106–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Xiasong, Liu, Zhexi, Yue, Lu and Zhao, Chunming, ‘Trade Barriers and Participation in the Global Value Chain: An Empirical Study Based on Anti‐dumping toward China’, China World Econ. 27, no. 2 (2019), 86–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Washington, Andre J., ‘Not So Fast, China: Non-Market Economy Status Is Not Necessary for the Surrogate Country Method’, Chi. J. Int’l L. 19 (2018), 260–294.Google Scholar
Webley, Lisa, ‘Qualitative Approaches to Empirical Legal Research,’ in Cane, Peter and Kritzer, Herbert (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research (Oxford University Press, 2010), 1–21.Google Scholar
Whalley, John and Wang, Jing, ‘Using Tax-Based Instruments for Innovative China’s Trade Rebalancing,’ in Fan, Shenggen, Ravi, Kanbur, Wei, Shang-Jin and Zhang, Xiaobo (eds.), The Oxford Companion to the Economics of China (Oxford University Press, 2014), 145–149.Google Scholar
William, Judge, Li, Shaomin and Pinsker, Robert, ‘National Adoption of International Accounting Standards: An Institutional Perspective’, Corp. Gov. Int’l Rev. 18, no. 3 (2010), 161–174.Google Scholar
Williams, Adam, ‘What a Dump! The Current State of Antidumping Duty Calculations in Non-Market Economy Cases’, Emory Int’l L. Rev. 32 (2017), 433–465.Google Scholar
Willems, Arnould R. and Brolin, Matilda J., ‘The Unhappy Marriage of Customs and Anti-Dumping Legislation: Tensions Relating to Product Description and Origin’, Leg. Issues Econ. Integration 45, no. 3 (2018), 229–251.Google Scholar
Williams, Mark, Competition Policy and Law in China, Hong Kong and Taiwan (Cambridge University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willig, Robert D., ‘Economic Effects of Antidumping Policy’, in Lawrence, Robert (ed.), Brookings Trade Forum (Brookings Institution Press, 1998), 57–79.Google Scholar
Wooton, Ian and Zanardi, Maurizio, ‘Trade and Competition Policy: Anti-Dumping versus Anti-trust’, University of Glasgow Discussion Paper in Economics No. 02-06 (2002).Google Scholar
Wood, Diane P., ‘“Unfair” Trade Injury: A Competition-Based Approach’, Stan. L. Rev. 41, no. 5 (1989), 1153–1200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Trade Organization, Dispute Settlement Reports 2001: Volume 8, Pages 3303–4047, Vol. 8 (Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
World Trade Organization, A Handbook on the WTO Dispute Settlement System (Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Wróbel, Anna, ‘The Functionality and Dysfunctionality of Global Trade Governance: The European Union Perspective’, in Rewizorski, Marek, Jędrzejowska, Karina and Wróbel, Anna (eds.), The Future of Global Economic Governance (Springer, 2020), 161–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wruuck, Patricia, The Political Economy of Anti-dumping Protection (Springer, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, Mark, ‘Anti-dumping in Asia’s Emerging Giants’, Harv. Int’l L.J. 53 (2012), 1–72.Google Scholar
Xu, Bin, ‘Trade Policy Reform and Trade Reform’, in Fan, Shenggen, Kanbur, Ravi, Wei, Shang-Jin and Zhang, Xiaobo (eds.), The Oxford Companion to the Economics of China (Oxford University Press, 2014), 156–160.Google Scholar
Xun, Gong and Cortese, Corinne. ‘A Socialist Market Economy with Chinese Characteristics: The Accounting Annual Report of China Mobile’, Account. Forum 41, no. 3 (2017), 206–220.Google Scholar
Yan, Shi, ‘The EU’s Push for WTO Reform: Proposals, Paths and Impacts’, China Int’l Stud. 76 (2019), 60.Google Scholar
Yang, Dennis Tao, ‘China’s Agricultural Crisis and Famine of 1959–1961: A Survey and Comparison to Soviet Famines’, Comp. Econ. Stud. 50, no. 1 (2008), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yilmazcan, Abdulkadir, ‘The Role of Anti-Dumping in the US–China Trade War’, China & WTO Rev. 2021, no. 1 (2021), 7–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yilmazcan, Abdulkadir, ‘The Slow Train to Reforming Anti-Dumping Measures’, Series 2, Vol. 3 Amicus Curiae (2022), 335–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yilmazcan, Abdulkadir, ‘The Slow Train to Reforming Anti-Dumping Measures: Concrete Solutions for the Future’, Series 2, Vol. 3 Amicus Curiae (2022), 517–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yong, Liu and Yiyi, Xie, ‘Analysis of the EU’s New Surrogate Country System for External Anti-Dumping and Its Illegality’, J. WTO & China 10 (2020), 52.Google Scholar
Yu, Chen, ‘Currency Manipulation and WTO Laws: Should the Anti-Dumping Mechanism Be Entirely Dumped?’, J. World Invest. Trade 20, no. 6 (2019), 891–915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, Tian, ‘The 10 Major Problems with the Anti-Dumping Instrument in The People’s Republic of China’, J. World Trade 39, no. 1 (2005), 97–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, Yongding, ‘Can China and the United States Avoid a Full-Blown Trade War?’, in Jiming, Ha and Posen, Adam S. (eds.), US–China Economic Relations: From Conflict to Solutions (PIIE, 2019), 41–57.Google Scholar
Zeng, Lingliang, ‘Non-market Economy Issues in Sino-EU Relations: A Purely Technical Matter or Beyond?’, in Chen, An (ed.), Contemporary International Law and China’s Peaceful Development (Springer, 2021), 577–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Yan and Wildemuth, Barbara M., ‘Qualitative Analysis of Content’, in Wildemuth, B. M. (ed.), Applications of Social Research Methods to Questions in Information and Library Science (Libraries Unlimited, 2009), 53–70.Google Scholar
Zhao, Yun, ed., International Governance and the Rule of Law in China under the Belt and Road Initiative (Cambridge University Press, 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zheng, Wentong, ‘Reforming Trade Remedies’, Mich. J. Int’l L. 34 (2012), 151.Google Scholar
Zhou, Weihuan, ‘China’s Litigation on Non-Market Economy Treatment at the WTO: A Preliminary Assessment’, Chin. J. Comp. L. 5, no. 2 (2017), 345–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Weihuan and Andrew, Percival, ‘Debunking the Myth of “Particular Market Situation” in WTO Antidumping Law’, J. Int’l Econ. L. 19, no. 4 (2016), 863–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Weihuan and Delei, Peng, ‘EU–Price Comparison Methodologies (DS516): Challenging the Non-Market Economy Methodology in Light of the Negotiating History of Article 15 of China’s WTO Accession Protocol’, J. World Trade 52, no. 3 (2018), 505–533.Google Scholar
Zhou, Weihuan and Zhang, Shu, ‘Anti-dumping Practices and China’s Implementation of WTO Rulings’, China Quart. 230 (2017), 512–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmermann, Claus D., ‘The Neglected Link between the Legal Nature of WTO Rules, the Political Filtering of WTO Disputes, and the Absence of Retrospective WTO Remedies’, Trade L. & Dev. 4, no. 1 (Summer 2012), 251–267.Google Scholar
Aggarwal, Aradhna, ‘Trade Effects of Anti-dumping in India: Who Benefits?’, Int’l Trade J. 25, no. 1 (2010), 112–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alam, M. H., ‘Next Steps Might Be Considered by Joe Biden for the Development of International Trade Law’, Eur. J. Eng. Res. Sci. 5, no. 11 (2020), 1372–1375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, Michael, ‘The Facts Available on “Facts Available”: An Analysis of Article 6.8 and Annex II of the WTO Anti-dumping Agreement’, N.Z. J. Public & Int’l L. 6, no. 2 (2008), 11–42.Google Scholar
Aranoff, Shara L., Patel, Sonam and Doggett, Molly J., ‘A Review of the Court of International Trade’s 2015 Decisions Addressing Trade Remedy Determinations of the US International Trade Commission and the Court’s Decisions Pursuant to 28 USC 1581 (i)’, Geo. J. Int’l L. 48 (2016), 7–68.Google Scholar
Areeda, Philip and Turner, Donald F., ‘Predatory Pricing and Related Practices under Section 2 of the Sherman Act’, J. Reprints Antitrust L. & Econ. 6 (1975), 697–733.Google Scholar
d’Aspremont, Claude, Encaoua, David and Ponssard, Jean-Pierre, ‘Competition Policy and Game Theory: Reflections Based on the Cement Industry Case’, in Norman, George (ed.), Market Structure and Competition Policy: Game Theoretical Approaches (Cambridge University Press, 2000), 9–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bacon-Shone, John, Introduction to Quantitative Research Methods (Graduate School, The University of Hong Kong, 2013).Google Scholar
Bagwell, Kyle, Bown, Chad and Staiger, Robert W., ‘Is the WTO Passé?’, J. Econ. Lit. 54, no. 4 (2016), 1125–1231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, Richard, ‘Regulatory Protectionism, Developing Nations and a Two-Tier World Trade System’, in Brookings Trade Forum (Brookings Institution Press, 2000), 237–293.Google Scholar
Baldwin, Richard and Di Mauro, Beatrice W., Economics in the Time of COVID-19: A New eBook (VOX, CEPR Policy Portal, 2020).Google Scholar
Baldwin, Richard and Tomiura, Eiichi, ‘Thinking Ahead about the Trade Impact of COVID-19’, in Baldwin, R. and Weder di Mauro, B. (eds.), Economics in the Time of COVID-19 (CEPR Press, 2020), 59.Google Scholar
Bao, Xiaohua and Qiu, Larry D., ‘Is China’s Antidumping More Retaliatory than That of the US?’, Rev. Int’l Econ. 19, no. 2 (2011), 374–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkworth, Julie M. and Murphy, Kristina, ‘Procedural Justice Policing and Citizen Compliance Behaviour: The Importance of Emotion’, Psychol. Crime & L. 21, no. 3 (2015), 254–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benedetto, John, Gamache, Lauren, Holbein, James and Thomsen, Craig, ‘Summary of the US International Trade Commission Centennial Proceedings’, J. Int’l Com. & Econ. 2017 (2017), 1–23.Google Scholar
Beshkar, Mostafa and Chilton, Adam S., ‘Revisiting Procedure and Precedent in the WTO: An Analysis of US–Countervailing and Anti-dumping Measures (China)’, World Trade Rev. 15, no. 2 (2016), 375–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bi, Ying, ‘Is Dumping Still Harmful? New Thinking on Anti-dumping in the Global Free Trade’, JE Asia & Int’l L. 6 (2013), 29–51.Google Scholar
Bork, Robert H., The Antitrust Paradox (Basic Books, 1978).Google Scholar
Bouët, Antonie and Métivier, Jeanne, ‘Is the Dispute Settlement System, “Jewel in the WTO’s Crown”, beyond Reach of Developing Countries?’, Rev. World Econ. 156 (2020), 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bown, Chad P., ‘The 2018 Trade War and the End of Dispute Settlement as We Knew It’, in Crowley, Meredith A. (ed.), Trade War: The Clash of Economic Systems Endangering Global Prosperity (CEPR Press, 2019), 21–32.Google Scholar
Bown, Chad P., ‘The 2018 US–China Trade Conflict after 40 Years of Special Protection.’ Chin. Econ. J. 12, no. 2 (2019), 109–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bown, Chad P., ‘Antidumping and Other Trade Disputes’, in Fan, Shenggen, Ravi, Kanbur, Wei, Shang-Jin and Zhang, Xiaobo (eds.), The Oxford Companion to the Economics of China (Oxford University Press, 2014), 114–119.Google Scholar
Bown, Chad P., Hoekman, Bernard and Ozden, Caglar, ‘The Pattern of US Antidumping: The Path from Initial Filing to WTO Dispute Settlement’, World Trade Rev. 2, no. 3 (2003), 349–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brander, James and Krugman, Paul, ‘A “Reciprocal Dumping” Model of International Trade’, J. Int’l Econ. 15, nos. 3–4 (1983), 320–321.Google Scholar
Brander, James and Spencer, Barbara, ‘Tariff Protection and Imperfect Competition’, in Grossman, G. M. (ed.), Imperfect Competition and International Trade (MIT Press, 1992), 107–119.Google Scholar
Brewster, Rachel, ‘The Remedy Gap: Institutional Design, Retaliation, and Trade Law Enforcement’, Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 80, no. 1 (2011), 102–158. Accessed 17 June 2023, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2146121.Google Scholar
Broncken, Marco and Natalie, McNelis, ‘Rethinking the “Like Product” Definition in WTO Antidumping Law’, J. World Trade 33, no. 3 (1999), 73–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, Stephen G. and Wohlforth, William C., ‘The Once and Future Superpower: Why China Won’t Overtake the United States’, Foreign Aff. 95 (2016), 91–104.Google Scholar
Bruton, Samuel V., ‘Teaching the Golden Rule’, J. Bus. Ethics 49, no. 2 (2004), 179–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busch, Marc L., Reinhardt, Eric and Shaffer, Gregory, ‘Does Legal Capacity Matter? A Survey of WTO Members’, World Trade Rev. 8, no. 4 (2009), 559–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cane, Peter and Kritzer, Herbert, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research (Oxford University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cann, Wesley A., ‘Internationalizing Our Views toward Recoupment and Market Power: Attacking the Anti-dumping/Antitrust Dichotomy through WTO-Consistent Global Welfare Theory’, U. Pa. J. Int’l Econ. L. 17 (1996), 69–231.Google Scholar
Carmody, Chios, ‘A Theory of WTO Law’, J. Int’l Econ. L. 11, no. 3 (2008), 527–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaisse, Julien and Debashis, Chakraborty, ‘Normative Obsolescence of the WTO Anti-dumping Agreement: Topography of the Global Use and Misuse of Initiations and Measures’, Asian J. Int’l L. 6, no. 2 (2016), 233–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, Kam C. and Fung, Hung-gay, eds., China’s Capital Markets: Challenges from WTO Membership (Edward Elgar, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chemerinsky, Erwin, Constitutional Law (Aspen, 2019).Google Scholar
Chen, Chien-Hsun, Mai, Chao-Cheng and Yu, Hui-Chuan, ‘The Effect of Export Tax Rebates on Export Performance: Theory and Evidence from China’, China Econ. Rev. 17, no. 2 (2006), 226–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Yusong, ‘Laws and Implementation in China: A 16 Years Review after Accession to the WTO’, in Bungenberg, Marc, Hahn, Michael, Herrmann, Christoph and Müller-Ibold, Till (eds.), The Future of Trade Defence Instruments (Springer, 2018), 283–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, Wenting and Drahos, Peter, ‘How China Built the World’s Biggest Patent Office: The Pressure Driving Mechanism’, Int. Rev. Intellect. Prop. Compet. L. 49, no. 1 (2018), 5–40.Google Scholar
Chilton, Adam S. and Davis, Ryan W., ‘Equality, Procedural Justice, and the World Trade Organization’, Intercultural Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 7 (2012), 277–327.Google Scholar
Cho, Sungjoon, ‘No More Zeroing?: The United States Changes Its Antidumping Policy to Comply with the WTO’, Am. Soc’y Int’l L. 16, no. 8 (2012).Google Scholar
Choi, Won-mog, ‘People’s Republic of China’s Proposals for Anti-dumping in WTO/DDA Rules Negotiations’, Asian J. WTO & Int’l Health L & Pol’y 2 (2007), 25–64.Google Scholar
Chunhui, Liu, Yao, Lee J., Hu, Nan and Liu, Ling, ‘The Impact of IFRS on Accounting Quality in a Regulated Market: An Empirical Study of China’, J. Account. Audit. & Finance 26, no. 4 (2011), 659–676.Google Scholar
Colantone, Italo and Stanig, Piero, ‘The Trade Origins of Economic Nationalism: Import Competition and Voting Behavior in Western Europe’, Am. J. Pol. Sci. 62, no. 4 (2018), 936–953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, Graham, ‘Confidentiality and Transparency in the WTO’s Party-Centric Dispute Settlement System’, in Huerta-Goldman, J. and Molina-Tejeda, Marco Tulio (eds.), Practical Aspects of WTO Litigation (Wolters Kluwer, 2019), 1–23.Google Scholar
Corr, Christopher F., ‘Trade Protection in the New Millennium: The Ascendancy of Anti-dumping Measures’, Nw. J. Int’l L. & Bus. 18 (1997), 49-110.Google Scholar
Croley, Steven P. and Jackson, Jack H., ‘WTO Dispute Procedures, Standard of Review, and Deference to National Governments’, Am. J. Int’l Law 90, no. 2 (1996), 193–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Czako, Judith, Johann, Human and Jorge, Miranda, A Handbook on Anti-Dumping Investigations (Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Daly, Gemma, ‘Should Truth Commissions Be Viewed as Second-Best Alternatives to Prosecutions’, SOAS L.J. 2 (2015) 176.Google Scholar
Dani, Rodrik, ‘Has Globalization Gone Too Far?’, Challenge 41, no. 2 (1998), 81–94.Google Scholar
Davey, William J., ‘The WTO and Rules-Based Dispute Settlement: Historical Evolution, Operational Success, and Future Challenges’, J. Int’l Econ. L. 17, no. 3 (2014), 679–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deardorff, Alan V., ‘Economic Perspectives on Dumping Law’, in Jackson, John H. and Vermulst, Edwin A. (eds.), Anti-dumping Law and Practice: A Comparative Study (The University of Michigan Press, 1989), 23–39.Google Scholar
Debroy, Bibek and Debashis, Chakraborty, eds., Anti-Dumping: Global Abuse of a Trade Policy Instrument (Academic Foundation, 2007).Google Scholar
Dent, Christopher M., ‘Brexit, Trump and Trade: Back to a Late Nineteenth Century Future?’, Compet. Change 24, nos. 3–4 (2020), 338–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denton, Ross, “(Why) Should Nations Utilize Anti-dumping Measures?’, Mich. J. Int’l L. 11 (1989), 224-272.Google Scholar
Fuchs, Richard, Alexander, Peter, Calum, Brown, Cossar, Frances, Henry, Roslyn C. and Rounsevell, Mark, ‘Why the US–China Trade War Spells Disaster for the Amazon’, Nature 567, no. 7749 (2019), 451–454.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edlin, Aeron S., ‘Stopping Above-Cost Predatory Pricing’, Yale L. J. 111, no. 4 (2002), 941–991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Effron, Robin J., ‘Reason Giving and Rule Making in Procedural Law’, Ala. L. Rev. 65 (2013), 683–733.Google Scholar
Ehlermann, Claus-Dieter and Lockhart, Nicolas, ‘Standard of Review in WTO Law’, J. Int’l Econ. Law 7, no. 3 (2004), 491–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endriss, Ulle, ‘Logic and Social Choice Theory’, Log. Philos. Today 2 (2011), 2–38.Google Scholar
Erixon, Fredrik, ‘Anti-dumping in the European Union’, in Debroy, B. and Chakraborty, Debashis (eds.), Anti-Dumping: Global Abuse of a Trade Policy Instrument (Academic Foundation, 2007), 139–142.Google Scholar
Ezzamel, Mahmoud and Xiao, Jason Zezhong, ‘The Development of Accounting Regulations for Foreign Invested Firms in China: The Role of Chinese Characteristics’, Account. Organ. Soc. 44 (2015), 60–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falkner, Robert, International Political Economy (University of London Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Fan, Shenggen, Ravi, Kanbur, Wei, Shang-Jin and Zhang, Xiaobo, eds., The Oxford Companion to the Economics of China (Oxford University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feenstra, Robert C., Advanced International Trade: Theory and Evidence (Princeton University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Feinberg, Robert M. and Reynolds, Kara M., ‘How Do Countries Respond to Anti‐dumping Filings? Dispute Settlement and Retaliatory Anti‐dumping’, World Econ. 41, no. 5 (2018), 1251–1268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Thiemo and Schwarz, Carlo, ‘Tariffs and Politics: Evidence from Trump’s Trade Wars’, Econ. J. 131, no. 636 (2021), 1717–1741.Google Scholar
Fontanelli, Filippo and Busco, Paolo, ‘The Function of Procedural Justice in International Adjudication’, Law Pract. Internat’l Court. Trib. 15, no. 1 (2016), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Eleanor M., ‘Competition Law and the Agenda for the WTO: Forging the Links of Competition and Trade’, Pac. Rim L. & Pol’y J. 4 (1995), 1.Google Scholar
Francois, Joseph, ‘Subsidies and Countervailing Measures: Determining the Benefits of Subsidies’ in Bagwell, Kyle W., Bermann, George A. and Mavroidis, Petros C. (eds.), Law and Economics of Contingent Protection in International Trade (Cambridge University Press, 2009), 113–115.Google Scholar
Fusch, Patricia I. and Ness, Lawrence R., ‘Are We There Yet? Data Saturation in Qualitative Research’, Qual. Rep. 20, no. 9 (2015), 1408–1416.Google Scholar
Gaffney, John P., ‘Due Process in the World Trade Organization: The Need for Procedural Justice in the Dispute Settlement System’, Am. U. Int’l L. Rev. 14 (1998), 1179–1221.Google Scholar
Gallo, Andres, ‘Trade Policy and Protectionism in Argentina’, Econ. Affairs 32, no. 1 (2012), 55–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gambardella, Maurizio, ‘Transparency in EU Antidumping Investigations: The European Ombudsman Perspective’, Glob. Trade Cust. J. 6, no. 3 (2011), 157–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garner, Bryan A., Black’s Law Dictionary (West Group, 1999).Google Scholar
Garrity-Rokous, Gates and Brescia, Raymond H., ‘Procedural Justice and International Human Rights: Towards a Procedural Jurisprudence for Human Rights Tribunals’, Yale J. Int’l L. 18 (1993), 559–603.Google Scholar
Gaudin, Germain and Mantzari, Despoina, ‘Margin Squeeze: An Above-Cost Predatory Pricing Approach’, J. Comp. L. & Econ. 12, no. 1 (2016), 151–179.Google Scholar
Gong, Xun and Corinne, Cortese, ‘A Socialist Market Economy with Chinese Characteristics: The Accounting Annual Report of China Mobile’, Account. Forum 41, no. 3 (2017), 206–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Andrew and Trebilcock, Michael, ‘Enforcing WTO Obligations: What Can We Learn from Export Subsidies?’, J. Int’l Econ. Law 10, no. 3 (2007), 653–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guest, Greg, Bunce, Arwen and Johnson, Laura, ‘How Many Interviews Are Enough? An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability’, Field Methods 18, no. 1 (2006), 59–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gwartney, James D., Stroup, Richard L., Sobel, Russel S. and Macpherson, David A., Economics: Private and Public Choice (Cengage Learning, 2016).Google Scholar
Halverson, Karen, ‘China’s WTO Accession: Economic, Legal, and Political Implications’, BC Int’l & Comp. L. Rev. 27 (2004), 319–370.Google Scholar
Han, Baoqing, ‘Analyzing China’s Litigation Costs in the WTO: Problems and Solutions’, J. WTO China 3, no. 4 (2013), 119–128.Google Scholar
Hannah, Erin, Scott, James and Wilkinson, Rorden, ‘The WTO in Buenos Aires: The Outcome and Its Significance for the Future of the Multilateral Trading System’, World Econ. 41, no. 10 (2018), 2578–2598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartman, Stephen W., ‘The WTO, the Doha Round Impasse, PTAs, and FTAs/RTAs’, Int’l Trade J. 27, no. 5 (2013), 411–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, Janice E., ‘The Practical Utility and Suitability of Email Interviews in Qualitative Research’, Qual. Rep. 23, no. 2 (2018), 493–501.Google Scholar
Hoekman, Bernard M. and Kostecki, Michael M., The Political Economy of the World Trading System: The WTO and Beyond (Oxford University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoekman, Bernard M. and Mavroidis, Petros C., World Trade Organization (WTO): Law, Economics, and Politics (Routledge, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollander-Blumoff, Rebecca and Tyler, Tom R., ‘Procedural Justice and the Rule of Law: Fostering Legitimacy in Alternative Dispute Resolution’, J. Disp. Resol. 1, no. 1 (2011), 1–20.Google Scholar
Horlick, Gary, ‘Ten Major Problems with the Anti-Dumping Instrument in the United States’, J. World Trade 39, no. 1 (2005), 169–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horlick, Gary and Vermulst, Edwin, ‘Ten Major Problems with the Anti-Dumping Instrument: An Attempt at Synthesis’, J. World Trade 39 (2005), 67–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hovenkamp, Herbert, ‘The Areeda–Turner Test for Exclusionary Pricing: A Critical Journal’, Rev. Indust. Org. 46, no. 3 (2015), 209–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howse, Robert and Michael, Trebilcock, The Regulation of International Trade (Routledge, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hua, Xiuping, Jiang, Ying, Sun, Qian and Xing, Xinyi. ‘Do Antidumping Measures Affect Chinese Export-Related Firms?’, Rev. Quant. Finance Account. 52 (2019), 891–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudec, Robert E., ‘Differences in National Environmental Standards: The Level-Playing-Field Dimension’, Minn. J. Global Trade 5 (1996), 1–28.Google Scholar
Hutton, Susan and Trebilcock, Michael, ‘An Empirical Study of the Application of Canadian Anti-Dumping Laws: A Search for Normative Rationales,’ J. World Trade 24 (1990), 123–146.Google Scholar
Jensen, Bradford J., Quinn, Dennis P. and Weymouth, Stephen, ‘The Influence of Firm Global Supply Chains and Foreign Currency Undervaluations on US Trade Disputes’, Int’l Org. 69, no. 4 (2015), 913–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kazeki, Jun, ‘Anti-dumping Negotiations under the WTO and FANs’, J. World Trade 44, no. 5 (2010), 931–965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, D. and Stiglitz, Joseph E., eds., Law and Economics with Chinese Characteristics: Institutions for Promoting Development in the Twenty-First Century (Oxford University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr, William A., ‘Dumping–One of Those Economic Myths’, Estey Centre J. Int’l L. Trade Pol’y 2, no. 2 (2001), 211–220.Google Scholar
Khan, Owais Hasan, ‘Interface between Antidumping and Competition Law: A Critical Analysis’, Interface 123 (2016), 123–138.Google Scholar
Kissinger, Henry, On China (Penguin Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Krishna, Raj, Anti-Dumping in Law and Practice (The World Bank, The World Bank E-Library, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroeber, Arthur R., China’s Economy: What Everyone Needs to Know (Oxford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Kwok, Kelvin, ‘The New Hong Kong Competition Law: Anomalies and Challenges’, World Comp. 37, no. 4 (2014), 541–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kyounghwa, Kim and Ahn, Dukgeun, ‘To Be or Not to Be with Targeted Dumping’, J. Int’l Econ. L.21, no. 3 (2018), 567–598.Google Scholar
Lai, Chung-Fu and Lee, Xi-Tsz, ‘The Effects of Anti-Dumping Duties in a New Open Economy Macroeconomics Model’, Int’l J. Econ. Fin. Issues 6, no. 3 (2016), 837–844.Google Scholar
Lai, Edwin, ‘The US–China Trade War, the American Public Opinions and Its Effects on China’, Econ. Pol. Stud. 7, no. 2 (2019), 169–184.Google Scholar
Langlois, John D., ‘The WTO and China’s Financial System’, China Quart. 167 (2001), 610–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leclerc, Jean-Mark, ‘Reforming Anti-dumping Law: Balancing the Interests of Consumers and Domestic Industries’, McGill L.J. 44 (1998), 111–140.Google Scholar
Lee, Pierce, ‘Rethinking the Rhetoric of Anti-dumping: A Response to Mark Wu’s Reform Proposal’, Ga. J. Int’l & Comp. L. 42 (2013), 459–488.Google Scholar
Lehne, Jens, Crisis at the WTO: Is the Blocking of Appointments to the WTO Appellate Body by the United States Legally Justified? (Carl Grossmann Verlag, 2019).Google Scholar
Lekfuangfu, Nam-Ake, ‘Rethinking the WTO Anti-Dumping Agreement from a Fairness Perspective’, Cambridge Student L. Rev. 4 (2008), 300.Google Scholar
Lenway, Stefanie, Randall, Morck and Bernard, Yeung, ‘Rent Seeking, Protectionism and Innovation in the American Steel Industry’, Econ. J. 106 (1996), 410–421.Google Scholar
Liu, Hongsong, ‘China’s Proposing Behavior in Global Governance: The Cases of the WTO Doha Round Negotiation and G-20 Process’, Rev. Bras. Polít. Int. 57, no. SPE (2014), 121–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Tao and Woo, Wing Thye, ‘Understanding the US–China Trade War’, China Econ. J. 11, no. 3 (2018), 319–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Xuepeng and Shi, Huimin, ‘Anti‐dumping Duty Circumvention through Trade Rerouting: Evidence from Chinese Exporters’, World Econ. 42, no. 5 (2019), 1427–1466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lichtman, Marilyn, Qualitative Research for the Social Sciences (SAGE Publications, 2013).Google Scholar
Lindsey, Brink and Daniel, Ikenson, Antidumping 101: The Devilish Details of ‘Unfair Trade’ Law (Center for Trade Policy Studies, Cato Institute, 2002).Google Scholar
Lindsey, Brink and Daniel, Ikenson, ‘The Rhetoric and Reality of US Anti-dumping Law’, in Debroy, Bibek and Chakraborty, Debashis (eds.), Anti-dumping: Global Abuse of a Trade Policy Instrument (Academic Foundation, 2007), 101–118.Google Scholar
Lo, Chung-fa, ‘A Proper Balance between WTO’s Members-Driven Nature and the Appellate Body’s Role as an Adjudicator: Careful Exercise of Judicial Activism’, in Lo, Chang-fa, Nakagawa, Junji and Chen, Tsai-fang (eds.), The Appellate Body of the WTO and Its Reform (Springer, 2020), 125–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, Yi, ‘Exploring Aggressive Legalism: Is Now a Good Time to Promote This Approach in Greater Asia?’, Asian J. L. Econ. 6, no. 1 (2015), 85–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, Yan, Anti-dumping in the WTO, the EU, and China: The Rise of Legalization in the Trade Regime and Its Consequences, Vol. 69 (Kluwer Law International BV, 2010).Google Scholar
Lynn, Preece S. and McMillan, Bart M., ‘Free Trade Does Not Equal Freedom from Red Tape: Practitioner Thoughts on FTAA Rules of Origin’, Int’l L. Rev. 1 (2003), 159.Google Scholar
Malawer, Stuart S., ‘Biden, National Security, Law & Global Trade: Less Subterfuge & More Strategy in the New Era of Crisis’, China WTO Rev. 7, no. 1 (2021), 185–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margolis, Stephen E., ‘Two Definitions of Efficiency in Law and Economics’, J. Legal Stud. 16, no. 2 (1987), 471–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, Sarah J., ‘Creating Barriers for Foreign Competitors: A Study of the Impact of Anti‐dumping Actions on the Performance of US Firms’, Strateg. Manag. J. 19, no. 1 (1998), 25–37.3.0.CO;2-C>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Antoine and Bryan, Mercurio, ‘Doha Dead and Buried in Nairobi: Lessons for the WTO’, J. Int’l Trade L. Pol’y 16, no. 1 (2017), 49–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martyn, Taylor D., International Competition Law: A New Dimension for the WTO? (Cambridge University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Matsushita, Mitsuo, ‘Basic Principles of the WTO and the Role of Competition Policy’, Wash. U. Global Stud. L. Rev. 3 (2004), 363–385.Google Scholar
Matsushita, Mitsuo, Schoenbaum, Thomas J., Mavroidis, Petros C. and Hahn, Michael, The World Trade Organization: Law, Practice, and Policy (Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Mavroidis, Petros C., Messerlin, Patrick A. and Wauters, Jasper M., The Law and Economics of Contingent Protection in the WTO (Edward Elgar, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mavroidis, Petros C. and Prusa, Thomas J., ‘Die Another Day: Zeroing in on Targeted Dumping: Did the AB Hit the Mark in US–Washing Machines?’, World Trade Rev. 17, no. 2 (2018), 239–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maxwell, Joseph A., ‘Using Qualitative Methods for Causal Explanation’, Field Methods 16, no. 3 (2004), 243–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messerlin, Patrick A., ‘Anti‐Dumping Regulations or Pro‐Cartel Law? The EC Chemical Cases’, World Econ. 13, no. 4 (1990), 465–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messerlin, Patrick A., ‘China in the World Trade Organization: Antidumping and Safeguards’, World Bank Econ. Rev. 18, no. 1 (2004), 105–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miranda, Jorge, ‘Implementation of the ‘Shift in Burden of Proof’ Approach to Interpreting Paragraph 15 of China’s Protocol of Accession’, Glob. Trade Cust. J. 11, no. 10 (2016), 447–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Andrew D., Sornarajah, Muthucumaraswamy and Tania, Voon, eds., Good Faith and International Economic Law (Oxford University Press, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mokrov, Gennady, Kamanina, Raisa V., Pavlova, Valentina V., Isaeva, Katerina V. and Bashkatov, Leonid D., ‘Antidumping Investigation: Calculation of the Dumping Margin’, Indian J. Sci. Technol. 9, no. 42 (2016), 104276, 1-11.Google Scholar
Moore, O. Michael, ‘US Facts–Available Antidumping Decisions: An Empirical Analysis’, Eur. J. Pol. Econ. 22, no. 3 (2006), 639–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, O. Michael and Maurizio, Zanardi, ‘Does Anti-dumping Use Contribute to Trade Liberalization in Developing Countries?’, Can. J. Econ./Rev. Can. d’Econ. 42, no. 2 (2009), 469–495.Google Scholar
Morgan, Clarisse, ‘Competition Policy and Anti-Dumping’, J. World Trade 30 (1996), 61–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niels, Gunnar and Kate, Adriaan T., ‘Anti‐dumping Protection in a Liberalising Country: Mexico’s Anti‐dumping Policy and Practice’, World Econ. 27, no. 7 (2004), 967–983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, Ulff-Moller Jorgen and Svendsen, Gert Tinggaard, ‘EU Lobbying and Anti-dumping Policy’, J. World Trade 46 (2012), 187–211.Google Scholar
Oesch, Matthias, ‘Standards of Review in WTO Panel Proceedings’, J. Int’l Econ. L. 6, no. 3 (2005), 635–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauwelyn, Joost, ‘WTO Dispute Settlement Post 2019: What to Expect?’, J. Int’l Econ. L. 22, no. 3 (2019), 297–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersmann, Ernst U., ‘The 2018 Trade Wars as a Threat to the World Trading System and Constitutional Democracies’, Trade L. & Dev. 10 (2018), 179–225.Google Scholar
Porter, Michael, Competitive Advantage of Nations: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance, Vol. 2. (Simon & Schuster, 2011).Google Scholar
Prost, Oliver, ‘Confidentiality Issues under the DSU: Fact-finding Process versus Confidentiality’, in Yerxa, Rufus and Wilson, Bruce (eds.), Key Issues in WTO Dispute Settlement (Cambridge University Press, 2005), 190–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prusa, Thomas J., ‘Anti‐dumping: A Growing Problem in International Trade’, World Econ. 28, no. 5 (2005), 683–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prusa, Thomas J. and Vermulst, Edwin, ‘United States – Certain Methodologies and Their Application to Anti-Dumping Proceedings Involving China: Nails in the Coffin of Unfair Dumping Margin Calculation Methodologies’, World Trade Rev. 18, no. 2 (2019), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prusa, Thomas J. and Vermulst, Edwin, ‘United States – Continued Existence and Application of Zeroing Methodology: The End of Zeroing?’, World Trade Rev. 10, no. 1 (2011), 45–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qin, Julia Ya, ‘China, India, and the Law of the World Trade Organization’, Asian J. Comp. L. 3 (2008), 1–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qin, Julia Ya, ‘Trade, Investment and Beyond: The Impact of WTO Accession on China’s Legal System’, in Keller, Perry (ed.), Law and the Market Economy in China (Routledge, 2017), 720–741.Google Scholar
Quartner, David, ‘Public Choice Theory, Protectionism and the Case of NAFTA’, Econ. Aff. 26, no. 1 (2006), 59–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raju, K. D., ‘India’s Involvement in Anti-Dumping Cases in the First Decade of WTO’, in Debroy, Dibek and Chakraborty, Debahsis (eds.), Anti-Dumping: Global Abuse of a Trade Policy Instrument (Academic Foundation, 2007), 31–47.Google Scholar
Ramírez, Rafael S. Espinosa, ‘Reciprocal Dumping and Environmental Polices’, Panor. Econ. 3, no. 6 (2017), 7–33.Google Scholar
Reich, Arie, ‘The Effectiveness of the WTO Dispute Settlement System: A Statistical Analysis’, in Kono, Toshiyuki, Hiscock, Mary and Reich, Arie (eds.), Transnational Commercial and Consumer Law (Springer, 2018), 1–43.Google Scholar
Resnick, David, ‘Due Process and Procedural Justice’, NOMOS Am. Soc’y Pol. Legal Phil. 18 (1977), 206–228.Google Scholar
Rodrik, Dani, ‘Political Economy of Trade Policy’, in Grossman, G. M. and Rogoff, Kenneth (eds.), Handbook of International Economics, Vol. 3 (Elsevier Science BV, 1995), 1457–1494.Google Scholar
Romano, Alessandro and Thammapitagkul, Peachya, ‘Anti-dumping: A Public Interest Not So Much in the Public Interest’, Manchester J. Int’l Econ. L. 10 (2013), 59–77.Google Scholar
Rovegno, Laura, ‘Trade Protection and Market Power: Evidence from US Anti-Dumping and Countervailing Duties’, Rev. World Econ. 149, no. 3 (2013), 443–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruttley, Philip R., Macvay, Iain and Weisberger, Mark, Due Process in WTO Dispute Settlement (Cameron May, 2001).Google Scholar
Schneider, Andrea K., ‘Not Quite a World without Trials: Why International Dispute Resolution Is Increasingly Judicialized’, J. Disp. Resol. 2006 (2006), 119–129.Google Scholar
Seo Dong, Woo, ‘Material Retardation Standard in the US Anti-dumping Law’, Law & Pol’y Int’l Bus. 24 (1992), 835–914.Google Scholar
Shadikhodjaev, Sherzod, ‘Non-Market Economies, Significant Market Distortions, and the 2017 EU Anti-Dumping Amendment’, J. Int’l Econ. L. 21, no. 4 (2018), 885–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, Rajesh, WTO Appellate Body at Cross Roads: Options and Alternatives, in Lo, Chang-fa, Nakagawa, Junji and Chen, Tsai-fang (eds.), The Appellate Body of the WTO and Its Reform (Springer, 2020), 239–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slater, Valerie A. and Ross, Lisa W., ‘Judicial Review of the International Trade Commission’s Determinations in Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: An Overview of Decisions in 2006’, Geo. J. Int’l L. 39 (2007), 69.Google Scholar
Smith, Stephen C. and Pan, Yao, ‘US–China Economic Relations’, in Fan, Shenggen, Ravi, Kanbur, Wei, Shang-Jin and Zhang, Xiaobo (eds.), The Oxford Companion to the Economics of China (Oxford University Press, 2014), 119–124.Google Scholar
Solum, Lawrence B., ‘Procedural Justice’, S. Cal. L. Rev. 78 (2004), 181–320.Google Scholar
Spamann, Holger, ‘Standard of Review for World Trade Organization Panels in Trade Remedy Cases: A Critical Analysis’, J. World Trade 38 (2004), 509–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stancil, Paul, ‘Substantive Equality and Procedural Justice’, Iowa L. Rev. 102 (2016), 1635–1690.Google Scholar
Steinbach, Armin, ‘Price Undertakings in EU Anti-dumping Proceedings – An Instrument of the Past?’, J. Econ. Integr. 29, no. 1 (2014), 165–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinbock, Dan, ‘US–China Trade War and Its Global Impacts’, China Q. Int. Strateg. Stud. 4, no. 4 (2018), 515–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stemler, Steve, ‘An Overview of Content Analysis’, Pract. Assess. Res. Eval. 7, no. 17 (2001), 137–146.Google Scholar
Stewart, TerenceP., ‘US–Japan Economic Disputes: The Role of Anti-Dumping and Countervailing Duty Laws’, Ariz. J. Int’l & Comp. L. 16 (1999), 689–750.Google Scholar
Sun, Shuwei, Zhao, Hailong, He, Xianjie and Zhang, Ying, ‘The Impact of Accounting Standards Convergence on Chinese Firms’ Overseas Mergers and Acquisitions’, China J. Account. Res. 12, no. 3 (2019), 231–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suranovic, M. Steven, ‘A Positive Analysis of Fairness with Applications to International Trade’, World Econ. 23, no. 3 (2000), 283–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sykes, Alan O., ‘Regulatory Protectionism and the Law of International Trade’, Univ. Chi. L. Rev. 66 (1999), 1–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Telep, Jeffrey M. and Lutz, Richard C., ‘China’s Long Road to Market Economy Status’, Geo. J. Int’l L. 49 (2017), 693–708.Google Scholar
Tharakan, P. K. Mathew, ‘Is Anti‐Dumping Here to Stay?’, World Econ. 22, no. 2 (1999), 179–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trommer, Silke Melanie, ‘Special Market Economy: Undermining the Principles of the WTO?’, Chin. J. Int’l L. 6, no. 3 (2007), 565–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, Tom R., ‘What Is Procedural Justice? Criteria Used by Citizens to Assess the Fairness of Legal Procedures’, Law & Soc’y Rev. 22 (1988), 103–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Updegraff, Ragan, ‘Striking a Balance between Necessity and Fairness: The Use of Adverse Facts Available in Dumping and Subsidies Investigations’, Geo. J. Int’l L. 49 (2017), 710–787.Google Scholar
Van Bael, Ivo and Bellis, Jean-François, EU Anti-Dumping and Other Trade Defence Instruments (Kluwer Law International, 2011).Google Scholar
Van den Bossche, Peter and Denise, Prévost, ‘Rules on Unfair Trade’, in Van den Bossche, Peter and Prévost, Denise (eds.), Essentials of WTO Law (Cambridge University Press, 2016), 141–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van den Bossche, Peter and Zdouc, Werner, The Law and Policy of the World Trade Organization: Text, Cases and Materials (Cambridge University Press, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermulst, Edwin, ‘Ten Major Problems with the Anti-Dumping Instrument in the European Community’, J. World Trade 39 (2005), 67–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermulst, Edwin and Daniel, Ikenson, ‘Zeroing under the WTO Anti-Dumping Agreement: Where Do We Stand?’, Glob. Trade Cust. J. 2, no. 6 (2007), 231–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermulst, Edwin and Gatta, Brian, ‘Concurrent Trade Defense Investigations in the EU, the EU’s New Anti-Subsidy Practice against China, and the Future of Both’, World Trade Rev. 11 (2012), 527–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermulst, Edwin and Sud, Juhi Dion, ‘The New Rules Adopted by the European Union to Address “Significant Distortions” in the Anti-Dumping Context’, in Bungenberg, Marc, Hahn, Michael, Herrmann, Christoph and Müller-Ibold, Till (eds.), The Future of Trade Defence Instruments (Springer, 2018), 63–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viner, Jacob, ‘The Prevalence of Dumping in International Trade: I’, J. Pol. Econ. 30, no. 5 (1922), 655–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viner, Jacob, ‘The Prevalence of Dumping in International Trade: II’, J. Pol. Econ. 30, no. 6 (1922), 796–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voon, Tania, ‘Eliminating Trade Remedies from the WTO: Lessons from Regional Trade Agreements’, Int’l & Comp. L. Q. 59, no. 3 (2010), 625–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, Markus, ‘The Impending Demise of the WTO Appellate Body: From Centrepiece to Historical Relic?’, in Lo, Chang-fa, Nakagawa, Junji and Chen, Tsai-fang (eds.), The Appellate Body of the WTO and Its Reform (Springer, 2020), 67–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Xiaosong, Hou, Jack and Lin, Faqin, ‘ITC Antidumping toward China Rulings: Is Political Factor Overwhelming?’, Bull. Econ. Res. 74, no. 1 (2021), 106–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Xiasong, Liu, Zhexi, Yue, Lu and Zhao, Chunming, ‘Trade Barriers and Participation in the Global Value Chain: An Empirical Study Based on Anti‐dumping toward China’, China World Econ. 27, no. 2 (2019), 86–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Washington, Andre J., ‘Not So Fast, China: Non-Market Economy Status Is Not Necessary for the Surrogate Country Method’, Chi. J. Int’l L. 19 (2018), 260–294.Google Scholar
Webley, Lisa, ‘Qualitative Approaches to Empirical Legal Research,’ in Cane, Peter and Kritzer, Herbert (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research (Oxford University Press, 2010), 1–21.Google Scholar
Whalley, John and Wang, Jing, ‘Using Tax-Based Instruments for Innovative China’s Trade Rebalancing,’ in Fan, Shenggen, Ravi, Kanbur, Wei, Shang-Jin and Zhang, Xiaobo (eds.), The Oxford Companion to the Economics of China (Oxford University Press, 2014), 145–149.Google Scholar
William, Judge, Li, Shaomin and Pinsker, Robert, ‘National Adoption of International Accounting Standards: An Institutional Perspective’, Corp. Gov. Int’l Rev. 18, no. 3 (2010), 161–174.Google Scholar
Williams, Adam, ‘What a Dump! The Current State of Antidumping Duty Calculations in Non-Market Economy Cases’, Emory Int’l L. Rev. 32 (2017), 433–465.Google Scholar
Willems, Arnould R. and Brolin, Matilda J., ‘The Unhappy Marriage of Customs and Anti-Dumping Legislation: Tensions Relating to Product Description and Origin’, Leg. Issues Econ. Integration 45, no. 3 (2018), 229–251.Google Scholar
Williams, Mark, Competition Policy and Law in China, Hong Kong and Taiwan (Cambridge University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willig, Robert D., ‘Economic Effects of Antidumping Policy’, in Lawrence, Robert (ed.), Brookings Trade Forum (Brookings Institution Press, 1998), 57–79.Google Scholar
Wooton, Ian and Zanardi, Maurizio, ‘Trade and Competition Policy: Anti-Dumping versus Anti-trust’, University of Glasgow Discussion Paper in Economics No. 02-06 (2002).Google Scholar
Wood, Diane P., ‘“Unfair” Trade Injury: A Competition-Based Approach’, Stan. L. Rev. 41, no. 5 (1989), 1153–1200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Trade Organization, Dispute Settlement Reports 2001: Volume 8, Pages 3303–4047, Vol. 8 (Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
World Trade Organization, A Handbook on the WTO Dispute Settlement System (Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Wróbel, Anna, ‘The Functionality and Dysfunctionality of Global Trade Governance: The European Union Perspective’, in Rewizorski, Marek, Jędrzejowska, Karina and Wróbel, Anna (eds.), The Future of Global Economic Governance (Springer, 2020), 161–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wruuck, Patricia, The Political Economy of Anti-dumping Protection (Springer, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, Mark, ‘Anti-dumping in Asia’s Emerging Giants’, Harv. Int’l L.J. 53 (2012), 1–72.Google Scholar
Xu, Bin, ‘Trade Policy Reform and Trade Reform’, in Fan, Shenggen, Kanbur, Ravi, Wei, Shang-Jin and Zhang, Xiaobo (eds.), The Oxford Companion to the Economics of China (Oxford University Press, 2014), 156–160.Google Scholar
Xun, Gong and Cortese, Corinne. ‘A Socialist Market Economy with Chinese Characteristics: The Accounting Annual Report of China Mobile’, Account. Forum 41, no. 3 (2017), 206–220.Google Scholar
Yan, Shi, ‘The EU’s Push for WTO Reform: Proposals, Paths and Impacts’, China Int’l Stud. 76 (2019), 60.Google Scholar
Yang, Dennis Tao, ‘China’s Agricultural Crisis and Famine of 1959–1961: A Survey and Comparison to Soviet Famines’, Comp. Econ. Stud. 50, no. 1 (2008), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yilmazcan, Abdulkadir, ‘The Role of Anti-Dumping in the US–China Trade War’, China & WTO Rev. 2021, no. 1 (2021), 7–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yilmazcan, Abdulkadir, ‘The Slow Train to Reforming Anti-Dumping Measures’, Series 2, Vol. 3 Amicus Curiae (2022), 335–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yilmazcan, Abdulkadir, ‘The Slow Train to Reforming Anti-Dumping Measures: Concrete Solutions for the Future’, Series 2, Vol. 3 Amicus Curiae (2022), 517–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yong, Liu and Yiyi, Xie, ‘Analysis of the EU’s New Surrogate Country System for External Anti-Dumping and Its Illegality’, J. WTO & China 10 (2020), 52.Google Scholar
Yu, Chen, ‘Currency Manipulation and WTO Laws: Should the Anti-Dumping Mechanism Be Entirely Dumped?’, J. World Invest. Trade 20, no. 6 (2019), 891–915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, Tian, ‘The 10 Major Problems with the Anti-Dumping Instrument in The People’s Republic of China’, J. World Trade 39, no. 1 (2005), 97–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, Yongding, ‘Can China and the United States Avoid a Full-Blown Trade War?’, in Jiming, Ha and Posen, Adam S. (eds.), US–China Economic Relations: From Conflict to Solutions (PIIE, 2019), 41–57.Google Scholar
Zeng, Lingliang, ‘Non-market Economy Issues in Sino-EU Relations: A Purely Technical Matter or Beyond?’, in Chen, An (ed.), Contemporary International Law and China’s Peaceful Development (Springer, 2021), 577–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Yan and Wildemuth, Barbara M., ‘Qualitative Analysis of Content’, in Wildemuth, B. M. (ed.), Applications of Social Research Methods to Questions in Information and Library Science (Libraries Unlimited, 2009), 53–70.Google Scholar
Zhao, Yun, ed., International Governance and the Rule of Law in China under the Belt and Road Initiative (Cambridge University Press, 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zheng, Wentong, ‘Reforming Trade Remedies’, Mich. J. Int’l L. 34 (2012), 151.Google Scholar
Zhou, Weihuan, ‘China’s Litigation on Non-Market Economy Treatment at the WTO: A Preliminary Assessment’, Chin. J. Comp. L. 5, no. 2 (2017), 345–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Weihuan and Andrew, Percival, ‘Debunking the Myth of “Particular Market Situation” in WTO Antidumping Law’, J. Int’l Econ. L. 19, no. 4 (2016), 863–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Weihuan and Delei, Peng, ‘EU–Price Comparison Methodologies (DS516): Challenging the Non-Market Economy Methodology in Light of the Negotiating History of Article 15 of China’s WTO Accession Protocol’, J. World Trade 52, no. 3 (2018), 505–533.Google Scholar
Zhou, Weihuan and Zhang, Shu, ‘Anti-dumping Practices and China’s Implementation of WTO Rulings’, China Quart. 230 (2017), 512–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmermann, Claus D., ‘The Neglected Link between the Legal Nature of WTO Rules, the Political Filtering of WTO Disputes, and the Absence of Retrospective WTO Remedies’, Trade L. & Dev. 4, no. 1 (Summer 2012), 251–267.Google Scholar
37th Annual Report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on the EU’s Anti-Dumping, Anti-Subsidy and Safeguard Activities and the Use of Trade Defence Instruments by Third Countries Targeting the EU in 2018, EU Commission, accessed 17 June 2023, http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2019/march/tradoc_157810.pdf.Google Scholar
‘Anti-dumping in the Doha Development Agenda’, ICC, accessed 17 June 2023, https://iccwbo.org/publication/anti-dumping-in-the-doha-development-agenda/.Google Scholar
Bacchus, James, ‘Might Unmakes Right: The American Assault on the Rule of Law in World Trade’, CIGI Papers No. 173 (2018).Google Scholar
Bown, Chad P., ‘Temporary Trade Barriers Database: Update through 2013’, World Bank, 2014, accessed 17 June 2023, http://econ.worldbank.org/ttbd/.Google Scholar
Bown, Chad P., ‘China’s Market Economy Status and Antidumping: A $100 Billion, $10 Billion, or $1 Billion Dispute? Part 2’, Peterson Institute for International Economics (8 June 2016), accessed 1 June 2022, https://piie.com/blogs/trade-investment-policy-watch/chinas-market-economy-status-and-antidumping-100-billion-10-0.Google Scholar
Bown, Chad P., ‘Should the United States Recognize China as a Market Economy?’ No. PB16–24 (2016).Google Scholar
Bown, Chad P., Trade Remedies and World Trade Organization Dispute Settlement: Why Are So Few Challenged? (The World Bank, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bown, Chad P., ‘US–China Phase One Tracker: China’s Purchases of US Goods’, Peterson Institute for International Economics (2021), accessed 18 July 2023, www.piie.com/research/piie-charts/us-china-phase-one-tracker-chinas-purchases-us-goods.Google Scholar
Bown, Chad P., US–China Trade War Tariffs: An Up-to-Date Chart, PIIE Charts (14 February 2020 [20 September 2019]) www.piie.com/research/piie-charts/us-china-trade-war-tariffs-date-chart [last updated on 6 April 2023 as: China and the United States Change Their Tariffs].Google Scholar
Bown, Chad P. and Prusa, Thomas J., ‘US Antidumping: Much Ado About Zeroing’, The World Bank Research Working Paper (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bown, Chad P. and Zhang, Yiwen, Measuring Trump’s 2018 Trade Protection: Five Takeaways, Technical Report, Peterson Institute for International Economics (2019).Google Scholar
China, The World Factbook, accessed 15 July 2023, www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/ch.html.Google Scholar
Chow, Gregory, ‘The Impact of Joining WTO on China’s Economic’, Legal and Political Institutions (2001), accessed 15 July 2023, http://econwpa.wustl.edu.Google Scholar
Eechout, Piet, ‘Administrative Procedures in EU External Trade Law’ (2011), accessed 10 July 2023, www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/note/join/2011/432758/IPOL-JURI_NT(2011)432758_EN.pdf.Google Scholar
European Commission, Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council (2019), accessed 15 July 2023, https://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2020/may/tradoc_158733.PDFGoogle Scholar
Ganne, Emmanualle, Can Blockchain Revolutionize International Trade? (World Trade Organization, 2018).Google Scholar
Global Trade Alert, Total Number of Implemented Interventions since November (2008), www.globaltradealert.org/global_dynamics.Google Scholar
Hansen, Jørgen Drud and Nielsen, Jørgen Ulff-Møller. ‘The Puzzle of Simultaneous Anti-dumping and Anti-subsidy Measures’, draft, at 4 (2011).Google Scholar
Herrero, Alicia, ‘From Globalization to Deglobalization: Zooming into Trade’, Las Claves de la Globalizacion, 33–52 (2019).Google Scholar
Hillman, J., ‘Three Approaches to Fixing the World Trade Organization’s Appellate Body: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly’, IIEL Issue Briefs (2018).Google Scholar
Hoekman, Bernard, Competition Policy and the Global Trading System: A Developing-Country Perspective (The World Bank, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoekman, Bernard and Mavroidis, Petros C., ‘Burning Down the House? The Appellate Body in the Centre of the WTO Crisis’, The Appellate Body in the Centre of the WTO Crisis, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Research Paper No. RSCAS 56 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘An Introduction to Anti-Dumping Law of EU and US as It Applies to Seafood’ (2010), accessed 14 June 2022, www.hambreyconsulting.co.uk/Documents/Course-handbook-eng.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juhás, Henrich and Zuzana, Kittová, ‘Antidumping Investigations of the European Union in the Time of Pandemic COVID-19’, 21st International Joint Conference Central and Eastern Europe in the Changing Business Environment (2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krugman, Paul R., ‘Industrial Organization and International Trade’, Handb. Ind. Organ. 2 (1989), 1179–1223.Google Scholar
Li, Yuefen, ‘Why Is China the World’s Number One Anti-Dumping Target?’, China in a Globalizing World (2005).Google Scholar
Lincicome, Scott and Manak, Inu, ‘Protectionism or National Security? The Use and Abuse of Section 232’, Policy Analysis 912 (2021).Google Scholar
Matschke, Xenia and Schöttner, Anja, ‘Antidumping as Strategic Trade Policy under Asymmetric Information’, CESifo Working Paper Series No. 2536 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGee, Robert, ‘Some Ethical Aspects of Antidumping Laws’ (2000), available at SSRN, accessed 16 July 2023, https://ssrn.com/abstract=242412 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.242412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michalopoulos, Constantine, Developing Countries’ Participation in the World Trade Organization (The World Bank, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neufeld, Nora I., Anti-dumping and Countervailing Procedures: Use or Abuse?: Implications for Developing Countries (UN, 2001).Google Scholar
OECD, Competition Policy, ‘General Distribution OCDE/GD (96) 59’ (OECD, 1996).Google Scholar
Palmeter, David N., ‘The Antidumping Law: A Legal and Administrative Nontariff Barrier’, Down in the Dumps: Administration of the Unfair Trade Laws (Brooking Institution, Washington, 1991), 65–89.Google Scholar
Panezi, Maria, ‘The WTO and the Spaghetti Bowl of Free Trade Agreements: Four Proposals for Moving Forward’, CIGI Policy Brief No. 87 (2016).Google Scholar
Puccio, Laura, ‘Granting Market Economy Status to China: An Analysis of WTO Law and of Selected WTO Members’ Policy’, European Parliamentary Research Service, November-PE 571 (2015).Google Scholar
Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council, European Commission (31 July 2018), accessed 17 July 2023, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2018:0561:FIN:EN:PDF.Google Scholar
Sanjay Kumar, Pandey and Bahal, Mansi, ‘International Trade: Dumping and Its Impact on Competition’, Competition Commission of India (2012).Google Scholar
Schneider-Petsinger, M., Dispute Settlement in Crisis, in Reforming the World Trade Organization Prospects for Transatlantic Cooperation and the Global Trade System, Chatham House Research Paper (2020), accessed 19 July 2023, www.chathamhouse.org/2020/09/reforming-world-trade-organization/04-dispute-settlement-crisis.Google Scholar
Schott, Jeffrey J. and Eujin, Jung, The WTO’s Existential Crisis: How to Salvage Its Ability to Settle Trade Disputes, No. PB19–19 (2019).Google Scholar
Staiger, Robert W. and Wolak, Frank A., Measuring Industry Specific Protection: Anti-Dumping in the United States, No. W4696 (National Bureau of Economic Research, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trade and Competition: Frictions after the Uruguay Round, OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 165 (1996), accessed 17 July 2023, www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/448346818265.pdf?expires=1614743590&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=09E0B528B657F096315B9466E2760DE4.Google Scholar
Trade Policy Review Report by the Secretariat China, WTO, 2018, WT/TPR/S/375, accessed 16 July 2023, https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/SS/directdoc.aspx?filename=q:/WT/TPR/S375.pdf&Open=True.Google Scholar
Van Li Thi, T. and Tong, Sarah Y., ‘China and Anti-dumping: Regulations, Practices and Responses’, East Asia Institute National University of Singapore Working Paper 149 (2009).Google Scholar
Waugh, Michael E., The Consumption Response to Trade Shocks: Evidence from the US-China Trade War, No. w26353, National Bureau of Economic Research (2019).Google Scholar
World Trade Statistical Review, Statistics on Anti-Dumping (2021), accessed 15 July 2023, www.wto.org/english/res_e/statis_e/wts2021_e/wts2021_e.pdf.Google Scholar
Wrobel, Ralph, ‘The “China Effect”: Changes in International Trade Patterns as Reasons for Rising Anti-Globalism’, No. 2020-1. Ordnungspolitische Diskurse (2020).Google Scholar
Yandle, Bruce and Young, Elizabeth M., ‘Dumping, Anti-dumping and Efficiency’, World Bank Internal Discussion Paper, http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/163311468914400721/pdf/multi0page.pdf.Google Scholar
Administrative Protective Order, accessed 16 July 2023, www.usitc.gov/secretary/apo_forms_and_redbook.htm.Google Scholar
Bandyopadhyay, N., ‘Anti-dumping Investigation in Agriculture: Issues of Trade Diversion-Named vs Non-named Countries’, LSU Master’s Theses (2008).Google Scholar
Bown, Chad P., Conconi, Paola, Erbahar, Aksel and Trimarchi, Lorenzo, ‘Trade Protection along Supply Chains: The Negative Effects of Tariffs on Downstream Sectors’, USApp–American Politics and Policy (2021), accessed 16 July 2023, http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/109194/1/usappblog_2021_02_10_trade_protection_along_supply_chains_how.pdf.Google Scholar
Calculation of Dumping Margins: EU and US Rules and Practices in Light of the Debate on China’s Market Economy Status, European Parliament (2016) accessed 30 June 2023, www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/IDAN/2016/583794/EPRS_IDA(2016)583794_EN.pdf.Google Scholar
Cambridge Dictionary, ‘a level playing field’, accessed 16 July 2023, https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/a-level-playing-field.Google Scholar
Carmody, Chios, ‘Fairness in International Economic Law and Relations’, SSRN (13 February 2013), https://ssrn.com/abstract=2161623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
China December Trade Data Bad, but Likely to Get Worse This Year (2019), accessed 15 July 2023, www.scmp.com/economy/china-economy/article/2181951/china-trade-data-worse-expected-bad-news-economy.Google Scholar
China-EU – International Trade in Goods Statistics, accessed 17 June 2023, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Main_Page.Google Scholar
Chronological List of Disputes Cases, WTO, accessed 16 July 2023, www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/dispu_status_e.htm.Google Scholar
Claims Are Made That Parts for E-bikes Imported from Mainland China Face Unwarranted Anti-dumping Tariffs, HKTDC Research (2019), accessed 15 July 2023, https://hkmb.hktdc.com/en/1X0AH7IX/hktdc-research/Claims-Are-Made-That-Parts-for-E-bikes-Imported-from-Mainland-China-Face-Unwarranted-Anti-dumping-Tariffs.Google Scholar
Colback, Lucy, How to Navigate the US–China Trade War, Financial Times (2020), www.ft.com/content/6124beb8-5724-11ea-abe5-8e03987b7b20.Google Scholar
Commerce Questionnaires, accessed 15 July 2023, https://enforcement.trade.gov/questionnaires/questionnaires-ad.html.Google Scholar
Country Report on China (2017), accessed 15 June 2022, http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2017/december/tradoc_156474.pdf.Google Scholar
Cunningham, Edward, What Is the Future of China’s Private Sector?, Harvard Kennedy School (2022), accessed 17 June 2023, www.hks.harvard.edu/faculty-research/policy-topics/international-relations-security/what-future-chinas-private-sector.Google Scholar
Dao, Toan, ‘US Court of Appeals Upholds Anti-dumping Duties on Shrimp from Vietnam’ (2018), accessed 15 July 2023, www.seafoodsource.com/news/supply-trade/us-court-of-appeals-upholds-anti-dumping-duties-on-shrimp-from-vietnam.Google Scholar
Dispute Settlement: Legal Text, Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes, accessed 16 July 2023, www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/dsu_e.htm#12.Google Scholar
European Commission, Countries and Regions, accessed 17 June 2023, https://ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/countries-and-regions/countries/vietnam/#:~:text=The%20European%20Union%20and%20Vietnam,Council%20on%2030%20March%202020.Google Scholar
European Commission, The EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement, accessed 19 July 2023, https://ec.europa.eu/info/relations-united-kingdom/eu-uk-trade-and-cooperation-agreement_en.Google Scholar
European Commission Presents Comprehensive Approach for the Modernisation of the World Trade Organisation, 2018, EU, accessed 17 June 2023, http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/press/index.cfm?id=1908.Google Scholar
Greater Bay Area Overview, accessed 15 July 2023, www.bayarea.gov.hk/en/about/overview.html.Google Scholar
Guidance on Marking of Goods of Hong Kong – Executive Order 13936, US Customs and Border Protection, accessed 18 July 2023, www.cbp.gov/trade/rulings/frequently-asked-questions-guidance-marking-goods-hong-kong-executive-order-13936?_ga=2.69427856.1287851153.1597626421-308187796.1597626421 (last modified 6 October 2020).Google Scholar
Guocan, Wu and Yifei, Gong, ‘The Accounting Information Support and Accounting Tactics of Protecting Rights and Interests in the Anti-Dumping Responding’, in 2010 2nd IEEE International Conference on Information Management and Engineering (IEEE, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hancock, Tom, ‘China’s Relentless Export Machine Moves Up the Value Chain’, Financial Times (2018), accessed 17 June 2023, www.ft.com/content/cdc53aee-bc2e-11e8-94b2-17176fbf93f5, www.worldtradelaw.net/, https://rcepsec.org/, https://tradingeconomics.com.Google Scholar
‘How a Chinese Company Targeted by US Tariffs for the Last 10 Years Has Adapted and Thrived’, South China Morning Post (2019), accessed 25 April 2020, www.scmp.com/business/companies/article/3010378/how-chinese-company-targeted-us-tariffs-last-10-years-has.Google Scholar
Keith, Tan et al., China Removes VAT Rebate on Steel Exports, Cuts Tax on Raw Material Imports to Zero (2021), accessed 17 June 2023, www.spglobal.com/platts/en/market-insights/latest-news/metals/042821-china-removes-vat-rebate-on-steel-exports-cuts-tax-on-raw-material-imports-to-zero.Google Scholar
KPMG, China: Country VAT Essentials Guide (2017).Google Scholar
McCarthy, Nail, 15 Countries Sign World’s Biggest Free Trade Deal, Statista (2020), accessed 19 July 2023, www.statista.com/chart/23497/key-facts-about-the-regional-comprehensive-economic-partnership/.Google Scholar
Mintzer, Sydney H., Layton, Duane W. and Lee, Timoty C., Proposed Changes to Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Regulations Would Make Proceedings More Efficient and Create New Enforcement Mechanisms (2020), www.mayerbrown.com/en/perspectives-events/publications/2020/08/proposed-changes-to-antidumping-and-countervailing-duty-regulations-would-make-proceedings-more-efficient-and-create-new-enforcement-mechanisms.Google Scholar
MOFCOM, Decree No. 12, 2006, Promulgating the Provisions on Responding to Actions of Anti-dumping of Export Products (2006), http://english.mofcom.gov.cn/.Google Scholar
Mwathi, Njeri, Types of Zeroing Methods in Dumping Margin Calculations, LinkedIn, accessed 17 June 2023, www.linkedin.com/pulse/types-zeroing-methods-dumping-margin-calculations-njeri-mwathi/.Google Scholar
Oppose Anti-Dumping Bill, New York Times, ProQuest Historical Newspapers (1920).Google Scholar
OXFAM, 2.7 Billion People Have Had No Social Protection to Cope with Covid-19 Economic Crisis (2020), accessed 19 July 2023, www.oxfam.org/en/press-releases/27-billion-people-have-had-no-social-protection-cope-covid-19-economic-crisis.Google Scholar
Patel, Deepesh and Ganne, Emmanuelle, ‘Blockchain & DLT in Trade: Where Do We Stand’, Trade Finance Global (2020), www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/blockchainanddlt_e.pdf.Google Scholar
Timeline: Key Dates in the US–China Trade War (2020), accessed 17 June 2023, www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trade-china-timeline/timeline-key-dates-in-the-u-s-china-trade-war-idUSKBN1ZE1AA.Google Scholar
TradeMap, accessed 15 July 2023, www.trademap.org/.Google Scholar
Training Module on the WTO Agreement on Anti-Dumping, UNCTAD (2006), accessed 16 July 2023, https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/ditctncd20046_en.pdf.Google Scholar
UNCTAD, World Investment Report 2018 (2018), accessed 17 June 2023, https://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/wir2018_en.pdf.Google Scholar
US International Trade Commission (USITC), Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Handbook, 14th ed. (2015).Google Scholar
USITC, Generic Questionnaires, accessed 17 June 2023, www.usitc.gov/trade_remedy/question.htm.Google Scholar
USITC, Mattresses from the People’s Republic of China: Antidumping Duty Order, A Notice by the International Trade Administration on 16 December 2019, accessed 17 June 2023, www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/12/16/2019-27166/mattresses-from-the-peoples-republic-of-china-antidumping-duty-order.Google Scholar
USITC, ‘Understanding Antidumping & Countervailing Duty Investigations’, accessed 17 June 2023, www.usitc.gov/press_room/usad.htm.Google Scholar
Who Uses IFRS Standards?, accessed 15 July 2023, www.ifrs.org/use-around-the-world/use-of-ifrs-standards-by-jurisdiction/.Google Scholar
Woodin, Hayley, ‘Burnaby Company Hit with 1,732% US Anti-Dumping Duties’ (2019), accessed 18 July 2023, https://biv.com/article/2019/06/us-china-trade-war-pushes-burnaby-company-cancel-exports.Google Scholar
The World Bank Data, accessed 17 June 2023, https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/TM.TAX.MRCH.WM.AR.ZS?locations=CNGoogle Scholar
WTO Negotiations on the Agreement on Anti-Dumping Practices, ITC (2005), accessed 17 June 2023, https://ticaret.gov.tr/data/5b8ee73113b8761b8471c2c4/wtonegotiations.pdf, www.wto.org, www.brainyquote.com.Google Scholar
WTO Tariff Analysis Online System, accessed 16 July 2023, http://tao.wto.org/.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Select Bibliography
  • Abdulkadir Yilmazcan, The University of Hong Kong
  • Book: Improving Procedural Justice in Anti-Dumping Investigations
  • Online publication: 09 May 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009450904.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Select Bibliography
  • Abdulkadir Yilmazcan, The University of Hong Kong
  • Book: Improving Procedural Justice in Anti-Dumping Investigations
  • Online publication: 09 May 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009450904.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Select Bibliography
  • Abdulkadir Yilmazcan, The University of Hong Kong
  • Book: Improving Procedural Justice in Anti-Dumping Investigations
  • Online publication: 09 May 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009450904.008
Available formats
×