Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-11T02:23:45.979Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Analog Front End, Array Elements, and Receiver Electronics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2018

Karl F. Warnick
Affiliation:
Brigham Young University, Utah
Rob Maaskant
Affiliation:
Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenberg
Marianna V. Ivashina
Affiliation:
Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenberg
David B. Davidson
Affiliation:
Curtin University, Perth
Brian D. Jeffs
Affiliation:
Brigham Young University, Utah
Get access

Summary

Having discussed the basic theory and approaches to phased array receiver modeling, as well as figures of merit and system characterization, we now turn to specific details of the design and fabrication of the front end aperture itself. A wide variety of element types and configurations have been explored. Chief examples include the wideband sinuous element of the early explorations of PAFs at NRAO [1], dipole elements for PAFs [2], [3] as well as aperture arrays [4], tapered slot antennas or Vivaldi elements [5], [6], derivatives of the TSA element such as the egg-crate array, the checkerboard array [7]–[9] and other current-sheet implementations, horn elements [10], and of course the ubiquitous microstrip patch antenna [11] and the patch excited cup antenna designed by RUAG Space [12]. Many of these designs were surveyed in Chapter 1. In this chapter, we review considerations on selecting an appropriate element type, methods for design optimization, and fabrication issues. Receiver electronics is also discussed, with a specific focus on low noise amplifiers. Signal transport is also briefly addressed. The chapter concludes with an overview of downconversion and sampling, as well as the analog filters which these processes require.

Frequency and Bandwidth

Perhaps the most fundamental criteria in selecting an element type for a phased array system are the operating frequency and bandwidth. Frequency of operation might be considered the initial point in selecting an element, but because a given antenna type can be scaled, within fabrication limitations, to resonate or operate over a wide range of frequencies, bandwidth is in some ways the more critical driver. Element types can be divided most simply into narrowband, resonant antennas (dipole, patch) and wideband antennas (sinuous antenna, Vivaldi, checkerboard, and others). The division between narrowband and wideband is of course not a precise cutoff, but 10% to 20% relative bandwidth (i.e., bandwidth divided by the design center frequency), might be considered the upper limit of narrowband antenna types, and antennas with wider relative bandwidth would be considered to be wideband or ultrawideband. Bandwidth limitations are discussed further in Sec. 9.4.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] J., Fisher and R. F., Bradley, “Full-sampling array feeds for radio telescopes,” Proc. SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering, vol. 4015, pp. 308–319, Jul. 2000.Google Scholar
[2] K. F., Warnick, B. D., Jeffs, J., Landon, et al., “BYU/NRAO 19-element phased array feed modeling and experimental results,” in Proc. URSI General Assembly, 2008.
[3] K. F., Warnick, D., Carter, T., Webb, et al., “Design and characterization of an active impedance matched low noise phased array feed,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 1876–1885, 2011.Google Scholar
[4] M. de, Vos, A. W., Gunst, and R., Nijboer, “The LOFAR telescope: System architecture and signal processing,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 97, no. 8, pp. 1431–1437, Aug. 2009. doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2009.2020509.Google Scholar
[5] M., Ivashina, J., Bregman, J. Bij de, Vaate, L., Li, and A., Parfitt, “Experimental results for a focal plane array, synthesized with conjugate field method,” in Proc. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium (APS), vol. 1, 2004, pp. 21–24.Google Scholar
[6] J. G. Bij de, Vaate, S. A., Torchinsky, A. J., Faulkner, et al., “SKA mid-frequency aperture arrays: Technology for the ultimate survey machine,” in Proc. URSI General Assembly and Scientific Symposium, Aug. 2014. doi: 10. 1109 / URSIGASS.2014.6929991.
[7] S. G., Hay, J. D., O'Sullivan, J. S., Kot, et al., “Focal plane array development for ASKAP (Australian SKA pathfinder),” in Proc. European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP), Edinburgh, UK, Nov. 2007.
[8] S. G., Hay and J. D., O'Sullivan, “Analysis of common-mode effects in a dualpolarized planar connected-array antenna,” Radio. Sci., vol. 43, RS6S04, 2008. doi: 10.1029/2007RS003798.
[9] D., DeBoer, R., Gough, J., Bunton, et al., “Australian SKA pathfinder: A highdynamic range wide-field of view survey telescope,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 97, no. 8, pp. 1507–1521, 2009.Google Scholar
[10] N., Erickson, G., Narayanan, J., Bardin, et al., “A 64 element, 70–95 GHz focal plane phased array,” in Proc. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium (AP-S), 2015, pp. 1514–1515.Google Scholar
[11] Z., Yang, K. F., Warnick, and C. L., Holloway, “A high radiation efficiency microstrip array feed for Ku band satellite communication,” in Proc. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium (AP-S), 2013, pp. 1576–1577.Google Scholar
[12] J., Johansson and P., Ingvarson, “Array antenna activities at RUAG space. An overview,” in Proc. European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (Eu- CAP), Gothenburg, Sweden, Apr. 2013, pp. 666–669.Google Scholar
[13] O., Iupikov, M., Ivashina, N., Skou, et al., “Multi-beam focal plane arrays with digital beamforming for high precision space-borne ocean remote sensing,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 737–748, 2018.Google Scholar
[14] C. J., Lonsdale, R. J., Cappallo, M. F., Morales, et al., “The Murchison Widefield Array: Design overview,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 97, no. 8, pp. 1497–1506, Aug. 2009.Google Scholar
[15] A. R., Parsons, D. C., Backer, G. S., Foster, et al., “The precision array for probing the epoch of re-ionization: Eight station results,” Astronomical Journal, vol. 139, no. 4, p. 1468, 2010. [Online]. Available: http://stacks.iop.org/1538-3881/139/i=4/a=1468.Google Scholar
[16] T. D., Webb, Design and polarimetric calibration of dual-polarized phased array feeds for radio astronomy, Master's thesis, Brigham Young University, 2012.
[17] J. D., Kraus and R. J., Marhefka, Antennas for All Applications, 3rd edn. Boston: McGraw-Hill, 2002.Google Scholar
[18] J. W. M., Baars, The paraboloidal reflector antenna in radio astronomy and communication. Springer, 2007.Google Scholar
[19] C. A., Balanis, Antenna Theory: Analysis and Design, 4th edn. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, 2016.Google Scholar
[20] J., Yang, P. S., Kildal, and M., Pantaleev, “Overview of developments of the eleven feeds,” in Proc. European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP), Apr. 2013, pp. 553–557.Google Scholar
[21] G. W., Kant, P. D., Patel, S. J., Wijnholds, M., Ruiter, and E. van der, Wal, “EMBRACE: A multi-beam 20 000-element radio astronomical phased array antenna demonstrator,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 1990–2003, Jun. 2011, issn: 0018-926X. doi: 10.1109/TAP.2011.2122233.Google Scholar
[22] P., Benthem and G. W., Kant, “EMBRACE: Results from an aperture array for radio astronomy,” in Proc. European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP), Mar. 2012, pp. 629–633. doi: 10.1109/EuCAP.2012.6206634.Google Scholar
[23] C., Cappellin, J., Lasson, O. A., Iupikov, et al., “Focal plane array breadboard for advanced multiple beam radiometer antennas,” in Proc. European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP), London, UK, Apr. 2018.
[24] A., Dunning, M. A., Bowen, D. B., Hayman, et al., “The development of a wideband ‘rocket’ phased array feed,” in Proc. European Microwave Conference, Oct. 4-6, 2016.
[25] C. E., Baum, “Transient arrays,” in Ultra-Wideband, Short-Pulse Electromagnetics 3, Springer. 1997, pp. 129–138.Google Scholar
[26] R., Hansen, “Linear connected arrays [coupled dipole arrays],” IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 154–156, 2004.Google Scholar
[27] H., Wheeler, “Simple relations derived fom a phased-array antenna made of an infinite current sheet,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 506–514, Jul. 1965.Google Scholar
[28] R., Shaw, S., Hay, and Y., Ranga, “Development of a low-noise active balun for a dual-polarized planar connected array antenna for ASKAP,” in Proc. International Conference on Electromagnetics and Applications (ICEAA), 2012, pp. 438–441.Google Scholar
[29] P., Serra, B., Koribalski, V., Kilborn, et al., “ASKAP HI imaging of the galaxy group IC 1459,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 452, no. 3, pp. 2680–2691, 2015.Google Scholar
[30] I., Heywood, K. W., Bannister, J., Marvil, et al., “Wide-field broad-band radio imaging with phased array feeds: A pilot multi-epoch continuum survey with ASKAP-BETA,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 457, no. 4, pp. 4160–4178, 2016.Google Scholar
[31] Y., Zhang and A. K., Brown, “Octagonal ring antenna for a compact dualpolarized aperture array,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 59, no. 10, pp. 3927–3932, 2011. doi: 10.1109/TAP.2011.2163742.Google Scholar
[32] J., Gilmore, D. B., Davidson, and J. G. Bij de, Vaate, “Progress on the development of a dual-polarized dense dipole array for the SKA mid-frequency aperture array,” in Proc. European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP), Apr. 2016. doi: 10.1109/EuCAP.2016.7481743.CrossRef
[33] B. A., Munk, Frequency Selective Surfaces: Theory and Design. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 2000.Google Scholar
[34] B. A., Munk, Finite Antennas Arrays and FSS. New York: JohnWiley and Sons, 2003.Google Scholar
[35] J., Gilmore and D. B., Davidson, “Suppressing undesired common-mode resonances in connected antenna arrays,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 63, no. 11, pp. 5245–5250, 2015.Google Scholar
[36] H., Wheeler, “Fundamental limitations of small antennas,” Proc. IRE, vol. 35, no. 12, pp. 1479–1484, 1947.Google Scholar
[37] L., Chu, “Physical limitations of omni-directional antennas,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 1163–1175, 1948.Google Scholar
[38] D. F., Sievenpiper, D. C., Dawson, M. M., Jacob, et al., “Experimental validation of performance limits and design guidelines for small antennas,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 8–19, 2012.Google Scholar
[39] J. H., Cloete, “Exact design of the Marchand balun,” in Proc. European Microwave Conference, Sep. 1979, pp. 480–484. doi: 10.1109/EUMA.1979.332751.Google Scholar
[40] M., Morin, Z., Yang, and K. F., Warnick, “Compact dual circularly polarized eleven feed over EBG for reflector antennas,” Forum for Electromagnetic Research Methods and Application Technology, vol. 6, 2014.
[41] S., Yan and G. A. E., Vandenbosch, “Compact circular polarizer based on chiral twisted double split-ring resonator,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 102, no. 10, p. 103 503, 2013.
[42] M., Takahashi, M., Ando, N., Goto, et al., “Dual circularly polarized radial line slot antennas,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 874–876, 1995.Google Scholar
[43] A. G., Roederer, “The cross antenna: A new low-profile circularly polarized radiator,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 704–710, 1990.Google Scholar
[44] Z., Yang and K. F., Warnick, “Jones matrix and s-parameter analysis using an equivalent circuit model for intrinsically dual circularly polarized microstrip antennas,” in Proc. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium (AP-S), 2015, pp. 1880–1881.Google Scholar
[45] J., Eck, Compact Antennas and Arrays for Unmanned Air Systems, Thesis, Brigham Young University, 2014.
[46] Z., Yang and K. F., Warnick, “Effect of mutual coupling on the sensitivity of dual polarized receivers in satellite communications,” in Proc. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium (AP-S), 2014, pp. 1528–1529.Google Scholar
[47] M., Khan and K. F., Warnick, “Noise figure reduction by port decoupling for dual circular polarised microstrip antenna,” Electronics Letters, vol. 50, no. 23, pp. 1662–1664, 2014.Google Scholar
[48] Z., Yang and K. F., Warnick, “Analysis and design of intrinsically dual circular polarized microstrip antennas using an equivalent circuit model and Jones matrix formulation,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 64, no. 9, pp. 3858–3868, 2016.Google Scholar
[49] R. L., Jefferson and D., Smith, “Dual circular polarised microstrip antenna design for a passive microwave transponder,” in Proc. IEE ICAP, 1991, pp. 141–143.Google Scholar
[50] W. M., Dorsey and A. I., Zaghloul, “Dual-band, dual-circularly polarised antenna element,” IET Microwaves, Antennas & Propagation, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 283–290, 2013.Google Scholar
[51] J., Chou, D., Lin, K., Weng, and H., Li, “All polarization receiving rectenna with harmonic rejection property for wireless power transmission,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 62, no. 10, pp. 5242–5249, 2014.Google Scholar
[52] J., Kulyk, G., Wu, L., Belostotski, and J. W., Haslett, “Wide-band two-stage GaAs LNA for radio astronomy,” Progress In Electromagnetics Research C, vol. 56, pp. 119–124, 2015.Google Scholar
[53] R. H., Witvers and E. E. M., Woestenburg, “A wideband low noise tile for the SKA mid-frequency aperture array,” in Proc. International Conference on Electromagnetics and Applications (ICEAA), Sep. 2015, pp. 113–116. doi: 10. 1109/ICEAA.2015.7297085.Google Scholar
[54] R. D., Norrod, J. R., Fisher, B., Jeffs, and K. F., Warnick, “Development of cryogenic phased array feeds for radio astronomy antennas,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Symposium on Phased Array Systems and Technology (ARRAY), 2010, pp. 629–631.Google Scholar
[55] G., Cortes-Medellin, A., Vishwas, S., Parshley, et al., “A fully cryogenic phased array camera for radio astronomy,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 2471–2481, 2015.Google Scholar
[56] G., Gonzalez, Microwave Transistor Amplifiers: Analysis and Design. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1997.Google Scholar
[57] L., Belostotski, B., Veidt, K. F., Warnick, and A., Madanayake, “Low-noise amplifier design considerations for use in antenna arrays,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 2508–2520, 2015.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×