Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-11T15:20:33.070Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Figures of Merit for Active Receiving Arrays

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2018

Karl F. Warnick ,
Rob Maaskant ,
Marianna V. Ivashina ,
David B. Davidson  and
Brian D. Jeffs
Karl F. Warnick
Affiliation:
Brigham Young University, Utah
Rob Maaskant
Affiliation:
Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenberg
Marianna V. Ivashina
Affiliation:
Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenberg
David B. Davidson
Affiliation:
Curtin University, Perth
Brian D. Jeffs
Affiliation:
Brigham Young University, Utah
Get access

Summary

The single antenna receiver reviewed in Chapter 2 can be fully characterized using classical antenna terms, such as directivity, gain, radiation efficiency, noise figure, noise temperature, and sensitivity. For an active array receiver, only the first and last of these figures of merit (directivity and sensitivity), are well-defined concepts. The pattern directivity is well defined and in principle can be measured for any receiver (see Sec. 5.2), and sensitivity can be determined from the SNR achieved with a signal of interest of known intensity. The other antenna terms require special treatment of the effects of antenna losses and amplifier stages and other nonreciprocal components in the active array system. In this chapter, we use the analytical framework developed in Chapters 4 and 5 to define efficiencies, antenna gain, system noise, and other figures of merit in a way that properly accounts for antenna losses and active, nonreciprocal components in the active antenna receiver system.

Specialized figures of merit have been widely used in the phased array antenna community for many decades. For transmitting arrays, the power radiated by one element in the array accounting for active impedance mismatch is measured by the element efficiency of Hannan [1] for transmitting arrays. To characterize the performance of a receiving array, the array signal processing community employs the SNR gain of the array relative to a single sensor, or the array gain, which is well defined and can easily be applied to any receiver system, no matter how complicated. All that is required is an identifiable output voltage or power and a measure of the signal and noise contributions at the output, so that the SNR at the output of the receiver system can be quantified. The multiple input multiple output (MIMO) communications community has developed other figures of merit that focus on measuring the performance of MIMO antenna arrays in terms of antenna diversity and channel capacity.

For high sensitivity applications, where optimizing the system noise performance is particularly critical to achieving stringent design goals, fine characterization of the efficiency and noisiness of critical components and subsystems has required the development of additional figures of merit for active array receivers. The most recent revision of the IEEE Standard for Definitions of Terms for Antennas [2] includes new terms for active antenna arrays that have resulted from research in the field of high sensitivity phased array receivers for radio astronomy.

Type
Chapter
Information
Phased Arrays for Radio Astronomy, Remote Sensing, and Satellite Communications
, pp. 179 - 220
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] P. W., Hannan, “The element-gain paradox for a phased-array antenna,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 423–433, Jul. 1964.Google Scholar
[2] IEEE Standard Definitions of Terms for Antennas, IEEE Std 145-2013.
[3] K. F., Warnick, M. V., Ivashina, R., Maaskant, and B., Woestenburg, “Unified definitions of efficiencies and system noise temperature for receiving antenna arrays,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 2121–2125, 2009.Google Scholar
[4] K. F., Warnick and B. D., Jeffs, “Gain and aperture efficiency for a reflector antenna with an array feed,” IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 5, p. 499, 2006.
[5] M. V., Ivashina, R., Maaskant, and B., Woestenburg, “Equivalent system representation to model the beam sensitivity of receiving antenna arrays,” IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 733–737, 2008.Google Scholar
[6] E. E. M., Woestenburg and K. F., Dijkstra, “Noise characterization of a phased array tile,” in Proc. European Microwave Conference, vol. 33, Munich, Germany. 2003, pp. 363–366.Google Scholar
[7] E. E. M., Woestenburg and J. C., Kuenen, “Low noise performance perspectives of wideband aperture phased arrays,” in The Square Kilometre Array: An Engineering Perspective, Springer. 2005, pp. 89–99.Google Scholar
[8] K. F., Warnick, B. D., Jeffs, J., Landon, et al., “BYU/NRAO 19-element phased array feed modeling and experimental results,” in Proc. URSI General Assembly and Scientific Symposium, Chicago, IL, Aug. 2008.Google Scholar
[9] K. F., Warnick, B. D., Jeffs, J., Landon, et al., “Phased array antenna design and characterization for next-generation radio telescopes,” in 2009 IEEE International Workshop on Antenna Technology, Santa Monica, CA, 2009.Google Scholar
[10] K. F., Warnick, B., Woestenburg, L., Belostotski, and P., Russer, “Minimizing the noise penalty due to mutual coupling for a receiving array,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 1634–1644, Jun. 2009.Google Scholar
[11] E. E. M., Woestenburg, “Noise matching in dense phased arrays,” ASTRON, Dwingeloo, The Netherlands, Tech. Rep. RP-083, Aug. 2005.Google Scholar
[12] N. M., Kehn, M. V., Ivashina, P.-S., Kildal, and R., Maaskant, “Definition of unifying decoupling efficiency of different array antennas-case study of dense focal plane array feed for parabolic reflector,” Int. J. Electron. Commun. (AEU), doi: 10.1016/j.aeue.2009.02.011.CrossRef
[13] R., Maaskant and B., Woestenburg, “Applying the active antenna impedance to achieve noise match in receiving array antennas,” in Proc. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium (AP-S), Honolulu, Hawaii, Jun. 2007, pp. 5889–5892.Google Scholar
[14] D. S., Prinsloo, R., Maaskant, M. V., Ivashina, and P., Meyer, “Mixed-mode sensitivity analysis of a combined differential and common mode active receiving antenna providing near-hemispherical field-of-view coverage,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 62, no. 8, pp. 3951–3961, Aug. 2014.Google Scholar
[15] A. De, Oliveira-Costa, M., Tegmark, B. M., Gaensler, et al., “A model of diffuse galactic radio emission from 10 MHz to 100 GHz,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 388, pp. 247–260, 2008.Google Scholar
[16] International Telecommunications Union (ITU), Tech. Rep. ITU-R P.676-9.
[17] International Telecommunications Union (ITU), Tech. Rep. ITU-R P.372-10.
[18] A. T., Young, “Air mass and refraction,” Applied Optics, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 1108–1110, 1994.Google Scholar
[19] A., Chippendale, D., McConnell, K., Bannister, et al., “Recent developments in measuring signal and noise in phased array feeds at CSIRO,” in Proc. European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP), Davos, Switzerland, 2016.Google Scholar
[20] D. B., Hayman, A. P., Chippendale, A. W., Hotan, et al., “Measuring radiotelescope phased array feed noise and sensitivity,” in Proc. European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP), 2014, pp. 3526–3530.Google Scholar
[21] A., Chippendale, D., Hayman, and S., Hay, “Measuring noise temperatures of phased-array antennas for astronomy at CSIRO,” Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia, vol. 31, e019, 2014.
[22] A., Chippendale, A., Brown, R., Beresford, et al., “Measured aperture-array noise temperature of the Mark II phased array feed for ASKAP,” in Proc. International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation (ISAP), Hobart, Tasmania, 2015.Google Scholar
[23] E., Woestenburg and K., Dijkstra, “Noise characterization of a phased array tile,”. 2003, pp. 363–366.
[24] E., Woestenburg and J., Kuenen, “Low noise performance perspectives of wideband aperture phased arrays,” in The Square Kilometre Array: An Engineering Perspective, Springer. 2005, pp. 89–99.Google Scholar
[25] K. F., Warnick, B. D., Jeffs, J., Landon, et al., “Phased array antenna design and characterization for next-generation radio telescopes,” in Proc. IEEE International Workshop on Antenna Technology (iWAT), 2009.Google Scholar
[26] E., Woestenburg, L., Bakker, M., Ruiter, M., Ivashina, and R. H., Witvers, “THACO: A test facility for characterizing the noise performance of active antenna arrays,” in Proc. European Radar Conference (EuRAD), 2011, pp. 389–392.Google Scholar
[27] E., Woestenburg, L., Bakker, and M. V., Ivashina, “Experimental results for the sensitivity of a low noise aperture array tile for the SKA,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 915–921, 2012.Google Scholar
[28] A. J., Beaulieu, L., Belostotski, T., Burgess, B., Veidt, and J. W., Haslett, “Noise performance of a phased-array feed with CMOS low-noise amplifiers,” IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 15, pp. 1719–1722, 2016.Google Scholar
[29] A., Chippendale, A., Brown, R., Beresford, et al., “Measured sensitivity of the first Mark II phased array feed on an ASKAP antenna,” in Proc. International Conference on Electromagnetics and Applications (ICEAA), 2015, pp. 541–544.Google Scholar
[30] D. M., Pozar and B., Kaufman, “Comparison of three methods for the measurement of printed antenna efficiency,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 136–139, 1988.Google Scholar
[31] J., Ashkenazy, E., Levine, and D., Treves, “Radiometric measurement of antenna efficiency,” Electronics letters, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 111–112, 1985.Google Scholar
[32] M., Sinclair and R., Gough, “System temperature calibration of the Australia Telescope receiver systems,” IREECON, vol. 91, pp. 381–384, 1991.Google Scholar
[33] C. A., Balanis, Antenna Theory: Analysis and Design, 4th edn. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, 2016.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×