Abbott, A. (1999). Department and Discipline: Chicago Sociology at One Hundred. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Abbott, A. and Gaziano, E. (1995). ‘Transition and Tradition: Departmental Faculty in the Era of the Second Chicago School’, in Fine, G. A., ed., A Second Chicago School? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Abrams, P. (1968). The Origins of British Sociology: 1834–1914. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Allen, R. G. D. and George, R. F. (1957). ‘Professor Sir Arthur Lyon Bowley: November 6th 1869–January 21st 1957’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 120: 236–41.Google Scholar

Arbuthnot, J. (1710). ‘An Argument for Divine Providence, Taken from the Constant Regularity Observed in the Births of Both Sexes’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 27: 186–90.Google Scholar

Armitage, A. (1966). Edmond Halley. London: Nelson.Google Scholar

Aron, R. (1936). La sociologie allemande contemporaine. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Aubrey, J. (1898). Brief Lives, ed. Clark, A.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Bannister, R. C. (1987). Sociology and Scientism: The American Quest for Objectivity, 1880–1940. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar

Barnes, H. E. (1948). An Introduction to the History of Sociology. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar

Bearman, P. (2012). ‘On Analytical Sociology’, Sociologica, DOI:10.2383/36859.Google Scholar

Bearman, P., Moody, J. and Stovel, K. (2004). ‘Chains of Affection: The Structure of Adolescent Romantic and Sexual Networks’, American Journal of Sociology, 110: 44–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Becker, G. S. (1976). The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bell, D. (1973). The Coming of Post-Industrial Society. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Benini, R. (1906). Principii di statistica metodologica. Torino: Tipografico-Editrice Torinese.Google Scholar

Berelson, B. R., Lazarsfeld, P. F. and McPhee, W. N. (1954). Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Berk, R. A. (2004). Regression Analysis: A Constructive Critique. Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernardi, F. and Ballarino, G., eds. (2016). Education, Occupation and Social Origin. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Bernardi, F. and Cebolla-Boado, H. (2014). ‘Previous School Results and Social Background: Compensation and Imperfect Information in Educational Transitions’, European Sociological Review, 30: 207–17.Google Scholar

Bernardi, F., Chakhaia, L. and Leopold, L. (2017). ‘Sing Me a Song with Statistical Significance: The (Mis)use of Statistical Significance Testing in European Sociological Research’, European Sociological Review, 33: 1–29.Google Scholar

Bernert, C. (1983). ‘The Career of Causal Analysis in American Sociology’, British Journal of Sociology, 24: 230–54.Google Scholar

Biggs, M. (2009). ‘Self-Fulfilling Prophecies’, in Hedström, P. and Bearman, P., eds., Analytical Sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Blalock, H. (1961). Causal Inferences in Nonexperimental Research. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar

Blau, P. M. (1990). ‘Structural Opportunities and Constraints: Merton’s Contribution to General Theory’, in Clark, J., Modgil, C. and Modgil, S., eds., Robert K. Merton: Consensus and Controversy. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar

Blau, P. M. and Duncan, O. D. (1967). The American Occupational Structure. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Blumer, H. (1931). ‘Science without Concepts’, American Journal of Sociology, 36: 515–33.Google Scholar

Blumer, H. (1939). Critiques of Research in the Social Sciences: An Appraisal of Thomas and Znaniecki’s ‘The Polish Peasant in Europe and America’. New York: Social Science Research Council.Google Scholar

Blumer, H. (1948). ‘Public Opinion and Public Opinion Polling’, American Sociological Review, 13: 542–9.Google Scholar

Blumer, H. (1955). ‘Sociological Analysis and the “Variable”’, American Sociological Review, 21: 683–90.Google Scholar

Booth, C. (1892–7). Life and Labour of the People of London, 2nd ed. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Booth, C. (1894). The Aged Poor in England and Wales: Conditions. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Boudon, R. (1967). L’analyse mathématique des faits sociaux. Paris: Plon.Google Scholar

Boudon, R. (1971/1981). The Crisis of Sociology. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Boudon, R. (1973a/1974). Education, Opportunity and Social Inequality. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Boudon, R. (1973b). Mathematical Structures of Social Mobility. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Boudon, R. (1976). ‘Comment on Hauser’s Review of Education, Opportunity and Social Inequality’, American Journal of Sociology, 81: 1175–87.Google Scholar

Boudon, R. (1977/1982). The Unintended Consequences of Social Action. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boudon, R. (1979). ‘Generating Models as a Research Strategy’, in Merton, R. K., Coleman, J. S. and Rossi, P. H., eds., Qualitative and Quantitative Social Research: Papers in Honor of Paul F. Lazarsfeld. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Boudon, R. (1986/1989). The Analysis of Ideology. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

Boudon, R. (1989). ‘Subjective Rationality and the Explanation of Social Behavior’, Rationality and Society, 1: 173–96.Google Scholar

Boudon, R. (1990a). ‘Individualism and Holism in the Social Sciences’, in Birnbaum, P. and Leca, J., eds., Individualism: Theories and Methods. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Boudon, R. (1990b/1994). The Art of Self-Persuasion. London: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Boudon, R. (1993). ‘Introduction’, in Boudon, R., ed., Paul F. Lazarsfeld: On Social Research and Its Language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Boudon, R. (1995). Le juste et le vrai: études sur l’objectivité des valeurs et de la connaissance. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar

Boudon, R. (1996). ‘The Cognitivist Model: A Generalized “Rational Choice” Model’, Rationality and Society, 8: 123–50.Google Scholar

Boudon, R. (1998). Études sur les sociologues classiques. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Boudon, R. (1999/2001). The Origin of Values. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar

Boudon, R. (2002a). Les méthodes en sociologie, 12th ed. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boudon, R. (2002b). ‘Sociology That Really Matters’, European Sociological Review, 18: 371–8.Google Scholar

Boudon, R. (2003a). Raisons, bonnes raisons. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Boudon, R. (2003b). ‘La conversion de Coleman à la théorie du choix rationnel: impressions et conjectures’, Revue française de sociologie, 44: 389–98.Google Scholar

Boudon, R. (2005). The Poverty of Relativism. Oxford: Bardwell Press.Google Scholar

Boudon, R. (2009). ‘Why I Became a Sociologist’, in Cherkaoui, M. and Hamilton, P., eds., Raymond Boudon: A Life in Sociology. Oxford: Bardwell Press.Google Scholar

Boudon, R. (2010). La sociologie comme science. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar

Boudon, R. (2011). La rationalité. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Boudon, R. (2012). ‘“Analytical Sociology” and the Explanation of Beliefs’, Revue europénne des sciences sociales’, 50: 1–17.Google Scholar

Boudon, R. with Leroux, R. (2003). Y a-t-il encore une sociologie? Paris: Odile Jacob.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. (1979/1984). Distinction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. and Passeron, J.-C. (1970/1977). Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Bowley, A. L. (1901). Elements of Statistics. London: P. S. King.Google Scholar

Bowley, A. L. (1906). ‘Presidential Address, British Association, Section F’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 69: 540–58.Google Scholar

Bowley, A. L. (1915). The Nature and Purpose of the Measurement of Social Phenomena. London: P. S. King.Google Scholar

Bowley, A. L. (1926). ‘Measurement of the Precision Attained in Sampling’, Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute, 22, Supplement to Liv. 1: 6–62.Google Scholar

Bowley, A. L. and Burnett-Hurst, A. R. (1915). Livelihood and Poverty. London: Bell.Google Scholar

Bowley, A. L. and Hogg, M. H. (1925). Has Poverty Diminished? London: P. S. King.Google Scholar

Breen, R. (2009). ‘Formal Theory in the Social Sciences’, in Hedström, P. and Wittrock, B., eds., Frontiers of Sociology. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Breen, R. and Goldthorpe, J. H. (1997). ‘Explaining Educational Differentials: Towards a Formal Rational Action Theory’, Rationality and Society, 9: 275–305.Google Scholar

Bruch, E. E. (2014). ‘How Population Structure Shapes Neighbourhood Segregation’, American Journal of Sociology, 119: 1221–78.Google Scholar

Bruch, E. E. and Mare, R. D. (2006). ‘Neighborhood Choice and Neighborhood Change’, American Journal of Sociology, 112: 667–709.Google Scholar

Bruun, H. H. and Whimster, S., eds. (2012). Max Weber: Collected Methodological Writings. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Buis, M. L. (2012). ‘The Composition of Family Background: The Influence of Economic and Cultural Resources of both Parents on the Offspring’s Educational Attainment in the Netherlands between 1939 and 1991’, European Sociological Review, 29: 593–602.Google Scholar

Bukodi, E. and Goldthorpe, J. H. (2013). ‘Decomposing “Social Origins”: The Effects of Parents’ Class, Status, and Education on the Educational Attainment of their Children’, European Sociological Review, 29: 1024–39.Google Scholar

Bukodi, E. and Goldthorpe, J. H. (2016). ‘Educational Attainment – Relative or Absolute – as a Mediator of Intergenerational Class Mobility in Britain’, Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 43: 5–15.Google Scholar

Bukodi, E. and Goldthorpe, J. H. (2018). Social Mobility and Education in Britain: Research, Politics and Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bukodi, E., Dex, S. and Goldthorpe, J. H. (2011). ‘The Conceptualisation and Measurement of Occupational Hierarchies: A Review, a Proposal and some Illustrative Analyses’, Quality and Quantity, 45: 623–39.Google Scholar

Bukodi, E., Goldthorpe, J. H. and Zhao, Y. (2020). ‘Primary and Secondary Effects of Social Origins on Educational Attainment: New Findings for England’. SocArXiv. September 20. DOI:10.31235/osf.io/chvz7.Google Scholar

Bulmer, M. (1984). The Chicago School of Sociology. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Butterfield, H. (1931). The Whig Interpretation of History. London: Bell.Google Scholar

Cain, G. G. and Watts, H. W. (1970). ‘Problems in Making Policy Inferences from the Coleman Report’, American Sociological Review, 35: 228–42.Google Scholar

Camic, C. and Xie, Y. (1994). ‘The Statistical Turn in American Social Science: Columbia University, 1890 to 1915’, American Sociological Review, 59: 773–805.Google Scholar

Campbell, C. (1982). ‘A Dubious Distinction? An Inquiry into the Value and Use of Merton’s Concepts of Manifest and Latent Function’, American Sociological Review, 47: 29–44.Google Scholar

Candolle, A. de (1873). Histoire des sciences et des savants depuis deux siècles. Geneva: H. Georg.Google Scholar

Cassedy, J. H. (1973). Mortality in Pre-industrial Times: The Contemporary Verdict. Boston: Gregg.Google Scholar

Chessa, F. (1911). La trasmissione ereditaria delle professioni. Torino: Fratelli Bocca.Google Scholar

Chowdry, H. et al. (2013). ‘Widening Participation in Higher Education: Analysis Using Linked Administrative Data’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 176: 431–57.Google Scholar

Clark, J., ed. (1996). James S. Coleman. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar

Cocker, E. (1702). Cocker’s Arithmetic. London: Hawkins.Google Scholar

Cohen, I. B. (2005). The Triumph of Numbers. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Cole, S. (1994). ‘Why Sociology Doesn’t Make Progress Like the Natural Sciences’, Sociological Forum, 9: 133–54.Google Scholar

Coleman, J. S. (1961). The Adolescent Society. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar

Coleman, J. S. (1964). Introduction to Mathematical Sociology. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Coleman, J. S. (1970). ‘Reply to Cain and Watts’, American Sociological Review, 35: 242–9.Google Scholar

Coleman, J. S. (1980). ‘Paul F. Lazarsfeld: The Substance and Style of His Work’, in Merton, R. K. and Riley, M. W., eds., Sociological Traditions from Generation to Generation. Norwood: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar

Coleman, J. S. (1986a). Individual Interests and Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Coleman, J. S. (1986b). ‘Social Theory, Social Research, and a Theory of Action’, American Journal of Sociology, 91: 1309–35.Google Scholar

Coleman, J. S. (1987). ‘Microfoundations and Macrosocial Behaviour’, in Alexander, J., Giesen, B., Münch, R. and Smelser, N., eds., The Micro–Macro Link. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Coleman, J. S. (1989). ‘Weber and the Protestant Ethic: A Comment on Hernes’, Rationality and Society, 1: 291–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coleman, J. S. (1990a). ‘Columbia in the 1950s’, in Berger, B. M., ed., Authors of Their Own Lives. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Coleman, J. S. (1990b). Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar

Coleman, J. S. (1993). ‘The Impact of Gary Becker’s Work on Sociology’, Acta Sociologica, 36: 169–78.Google Scholar

Coleman, J. S. (1996). ‘A Vision for Sociology’, in Clark, J., ed., James S. Coleman. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar

Coleman, J. S. et al. (1966). Equality of Educational Opportunity. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar

Coleman, J. S., Hoffer, T. and Kilgore, S. (1982). High School Achievement: Public, Catholic and Private Schools. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Coleman, J. S., Katz, E. and Menzel, H. (1957). ‘The Diffusion of an Innovation among Physicians’, Sociometry, 20: 253–70.Google Scholar

Coleman, J. S., Katz, E. and Menzel, H. (1966). Medical Innovation. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar

Coleman, J. S., Kelly, S. and Moore, J. (1975). Trends in School Segregation, 1968–73, Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar

Coleman, Z. A. (1996). ‘Transcripts of Drafts for a Concluding Chapter by James S. Coleman with a Commentary by Zdzislawa Coleman: Contexts of Transcripts 1, 2 and 3’, Appendix 2 in Clark, J., ed., James S. Coleman, London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar

Collini, S. (1979). Liberalism and Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Comte, A. (1830–42/1908). Cours de philosophie positive. Paris: Schleicher Frères.Google Scholar

Converse, J. M. (1987). Survey Research in the United States: Roots and Emergence 1890–1960. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Cooley, C. H. (1918). Social Process. New York: Charles Scribner.Google Scholar

Coser, L. A. and Nisbet, R. (1975). ‘Merton and the Contemporary Mind: An Affectionate Dialogue’, in Coser, L. A., ed., The Idea of Social Structure: Papers in Honor of Robert K. Merton. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar

Cox, D. R. (1958). ‘The Regression Analysis of Binary Sequences’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 20: 215–42.Google Scholar

Cox, D. R. (1970). The Analysis of Binary Data. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar

Cox, D. R., Kartsonaki, C. and Keogh, R. H. (2018). ‘Big Data: Some Statistical Issues’, Statistics and Probability Letters, 136: 111–15.Google Scholar

Crothers, C. (1998). ‘The Relation between the Logics of Merton’s Theory and Lazarsfeld’s Methodology: Their Intellectual Compatibility and Research Partnership’, in Lautman, J. and Lécuyer, B.-P, eds., Paul Lazarsfeld (1901–1976): La sociologie de Vienne à New York. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar

Dale, A. and Katz, S. (2011). Arthur L. Bowley: A Pioneer in Modern Statistics and Economics. London: World Scientific Publishing.Google Scholar

Daston, L. (1990). ‘The Domestication of Risk: Mathematical Probability and Insurance 1650–1830’, in Krüger, L., Daston, L. and Heidelberger, M., eds., The Probabilistic Revolution, vol. 1. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Davenant, C. (1698). Discourses on the Publick Revenues, and on the Trade of England, 2 vols. London: Knapton.Google Scholar

Davidson, D. (1980). Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Demeulenaere, P., ed. (2011a). Analytical Sociology and Social Mechanisms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Demeulenaere, P. (2011b). ‘Introduction’, in Demeulenaere, P., ed., Analytical Sociology and Social Mechanisms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dennett, D. C. (2003). Freedom Evolves. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Denis, D. J. and Legerski, J. (2006). ‘Causal Modelling and the Origins of Path Analysis’, Theory and Science, 7: 1–19.Google Scholar

Desrosières, A. (1993/1998). The Politics of Large Numbers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Desrosières, A. (1997). ‘Quetelet et la sociologie quantitative: du piédestal à l’oubli’, in Actualité et universalité de la pensée scientifique d’Adolphe Quetelet, Brussels: Académie Royale de Belgique.Google Scholar

Diamond, M. and Stone, M. (1981). ‘Nightingale on Quetelet’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 144, Part 1: 66–79.Google Scholar

DiPrete, T. and Eirich, G. M. (2006). ‘Cumulative Advantage as a Mechanism for Inequality: A Review of Theoretical and Empirical Developments’, Annual Review of Sociology, 32: 271–97.Google Scholar

Donnelly, K. (2015). Adolphe Quetelet, Social Physics and the Average Men of Science, 1796–1874. London: Pickering and Chatto.Google Scholar

Duncan, B. and Duncan, O. D. (1978). Sex Typing and Social Roles: A Research Report. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Duncan, O. D. (1959). ‘An Appreciation of William Fielding Ogburn’, Technology and Culture, 1: 94–9.Google Scholar

Duncan, O. D. (1961). ‘A Socioeconomic Index for All Occupations’, in Reiss, A. J., ed., Occupations and Social Status. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar

Duncan, O. D. (1969). ‘Path Analysis: Sociological Examples’, American Journal of Sociology, 72: 1–16.Google Scholar

Duncan, O. D. (1974). ‘Autobiography for the National Academy of Sciences’, typescript. US National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar

Duncan, O. D. (1975). Introduction to Structural Equation Models. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Duncan, O. D. (1981). ‘A Ceremony of Research Reports’, Contemporary Sociology, 10: 357–61.Google Scholar

Duncan, O. D. (1982). ‘Statistical Methods for Categorical Data’, American Journal of Sociology, 87: 957–64.Google Scholar

Duncan, O. D. (1984). Notes on Social Measurement. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar

Duncan, O. D. (1992). ‘What If?’, Contemporary Sociology, 21: 667–8.Google Scholar

Duncan, O. D. and Duncan, B. (1957). The Negro Population of Chicago. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Duncan, O. D. and Hodge, R. W. (1963). ‘Education and Occupational Mobility: A Regression Analysis’, American Journal of Sociology, 68: 629–44.Google Scholar

Duncan, O. D., Featherman, D. L. and Duncan, B. (1972). Socioeconomic Background and Attainment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Dunlop, J. T., Harbison, F. H., Kerr, C. and Myers, C. A. (1975). Industrialism and Industrial Man Reconsidered. Princeton: Inter-University Study of Human Resources in National Development.Google Scholar

Durkheim, E. (1897/1952). Suicide. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Elderton, E. M., with Pearson, K. (1910). A First Study of the Influence of Parental Alcoholism on the Physique and Ability of the Offspring. London: Dulay.Google Scholar

Eldridge, J. E. T., ed. (1973). Max Weber: The Interpretation of Social Reality. London: Nelson.Google Scholar

Elster, J. (1990). ‘Merton’s Functionalism and the Unintended Consequences of Action’, in Clark, J., Modgil, C. and Modgil, S., eds., Robert K. Merton: Consensus and Controversy. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar

Elster, J. (1997). ‘More than Enough’, University of Chicago Law Review, 64: 748–64.Google Scholar

Elster, J. (1998). ‘A Plea for Mechanisms’, in Hedström, P. and Swedberg, R., eds., Social Mechanisms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Elster, J. (2007). Explaining Social Behaviour: More Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Elster, J. (2009). ‘Emotions’, in Hedström, P. and Bearman, P., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Elster, J. (2011). ‘The Two Great Fears of 1789’, Social Science Information, 50: 317–29.Google Scholar

Endres, A. M. (1985). ‘The Functions of Numerical Data in the Writings of Graunt, Petty and Davenant’, History of Political Economy, 17: 245–65.Google Scholar

Epstein, J. M. (2006). Generative Social Science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Erikson, R. and Goldthorpe, J. H. (1992). The Constant Flux: A Study of Class Mobility in Industrial Societies. Oxford: Clarendon Press Oxford.Google Scholar

Farr, J. (1983). ‘Popper’s Hermeneutics’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 13: 157–76.Google Scholar

Featherman, D. L. and Hauser, R. M. (1978). Opportunity and Change. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Featherman, D. L., Jones, F. L. and Hauser, R. M. (1975). ‘Assumptions of Social Mobility Research in the US: The Case of Occupational Status’, Social Science Research, 4: 329–60.Google Scholar

Flemmen, M. P., Jarness, V. and Rosenlund, L. (2019). ‘Class and Status: On the Misconstrual of the Conceptual Distinction and a Neo-Bourdieusian Alternative’, British Journal of Sociology, 70: 816–66.Google Scholar

Freedman, D. A. (1992). ‘As Others See Us: A Case Study in Path Analysis’, in Shaffer, J. P., ed., The Role of Models in Nonexperimental Social Science: Two Debates. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association and American Statistical Association.Google Scholar

Freedman, D. A. (1997). ‘From Association to Causation via Regression’, in McKim, V. R. and Turner, S. P., eds., Causality in Crisis? Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press.Google Scholar

Freedman, D. A. (2009). Statistical Models: Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Freedman, D. A. (2010). Statistical Models and Causal Inference: A Dialogue with the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Freeman, L. C. (2004). The Development of Social Network Analysis. Vancouver: Empirical Press.Google Scholar

Galton, F. 1869/1892. Hereditary Genius. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Galton, F. (1874). English Men of Science: Their Nature and Nurture. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Galton, F. (1889a). Natural Inheritance. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Galton, F. (1889b). ‘On a Method of Investigating the Development of Institutions: Applied to Laws of Marriage and Descent’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 18: 245–56, 261–9.Google Scholar

Galton, F. (1890). ‘Kinship and Correlation’, North American Review, 150: 419–31.Google Scholar

Galton, F. (1904). ‘Eugenics: Its Definition, Scope and Aims’, Sociological Papers, 1: 45–50, 78–9.Google Scholar

Galton, F. (1905). ‘Eugenics’, Sociological Papers, 2: 1–17.Google Scholar

Galton, F. (1909). ‘The Possible Improvement of the Human Breed’ in Essays in Eugenics. London: The Eugenics Education Society.Google Scholar

Gambetta, D. (2009). ‘Signalling’, in Hedström, P. and Bearman, P., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gangl, M. (2018). ‘Continuity and Change at ESR: A Letter from the Editor’, European Sociological Review, 34: 1–5.Google Scholar

Gerth, H. H. and Mills, C. W. (1970). From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Ghosh, P. (2009). Review of Radkau (2009), Times Literary Supplement, June 19.Google Scholar

Ghosh, P. (2014). Max Weber and the Protestant Ethic: Twin Histories. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Giddens, A. (1990). ‘R. K. Merton on Structural Analysis’, in Clark, J., Modgil, C. and Modgil, S., eds., Robert K. Merton: Consensus and Controversy. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar

Gigerenzer, G. (2008). Rationality for Mortals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gigerenzer, G., Swijtink, Z., Porter, T., Daston, L., Beatty, J. and Krüger, L. (1989). The Empire of Chance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gillham, N. W. (2001). Sir Francis Galton: From African Exploration to the Birth of Eugenics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gillispie, C. C. (1963). ‘Intellectual Factors in the Background of Analysis by Probabilities’, in Crombie, A. C., ed. Scientific Change. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Gini, C. (1912). I fattori demografici dell’evoluzione delle nazione. Torino: Fratelli Bocca.Google Scholar

Gini, C. and Galvani, L. (1929). ‘Di una applicazione del metodo rappresentativo all’ultimo censimento de la population italiano (1 dicembri, 1921)’, Annali di Statistica, Series 6, 4: 1–107.Google Scholar

Ginsberg, M. (1932/1962). ‘The Claims of Eugenics’, in Essays in Sociology and Social Philosophy, vol. 2. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar

Girard, A. and Bastide, H. (1963). ‘La stratification sociale et la démocratisation de l’enseignement’, Population, 18: 435–72.Google Scholar

Girard, A., Bastide, H. and Pourcher, G. (1963). ‘Enquête nationale sur l’entrée en sixième et la démocratisation de l’enseignement’, Population, 18: 7–48.Google Scholar

Glass, D. V. (1963). ‘John Graunt and His Natural and Political Observations’, Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 159: 2–32.Google Scholar

Glass, D. V. and Hall, J. R. (1954). ‘Education and Social Mobility’, in Glass, D. V., ed., Social Mobility in Britain. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Goldfrank, W. (1972). ‘Reappraising Le Play’, in Oberschall, A., ed., The Establishment of Empirical Sociology. New York: Harper Row.Google Scholar

Goldman, L. (2019). ‘Victorians and Numbers: Statistics and Social Science in Nineteenth-Century Britain’, in Panayotova, P., ed., The History of Sociology in Britain: New Research and Revaluation. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Goldthorpe, J. H. (1980/1987). Social Mobility and Class Structure in Modern Britain. Oxford: Clarendon Press Oxford.Google Scholar

Goldthorpe, J. H. (2007). On Sociology, 2nd ed., 2 vols. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Goldthorpe, J. H. (2016). Sociology as a Population Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Goldthorpe, J. H. (2019). ‘Sociology and Statistics in Britain: The Strange History of Social Mobility Research’, in Panayotova, P., ed., The History of Sociology in Britain: New Research and Revaluation. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Goodman, L. A. (1968). ‘The Analysis of Cross-Classified Data: Independence, Quasi-Independence, and Interactions in Tables with or without Missing Entries’, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 63: 1091–131.Google Scholar

Goodman, L. A. (1969). ‘How to Ransack Social Mobility Tables and Other Kinds of Cross-Classification Tables’, American Journal of Sociology, 75: 1–40.Google Scholar

Goodman, L. A. (1979). ‘The Analysis of Qualitative Variables Using More Parsimonious Quasi-independence Models, Scaling Models, and Latent Structures’, in Merton, R. K., Coleman, J. S. and Rossi, P. H., eds., Qualitative and Quantitative Social Research: Papers in Honor of Paul F. Lazarsfeld. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Goodman, L. A. (2007). ‘Otis Dudley Duncan: Quantitative Sociologist par excellence: Path Analysis, Loglinear Models, and Rasch Models’, Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 25: 129–39.Google Scholar

Graunt, J. (1662). Natural and Political Observations Mentioned in a Following Index and Made upon the Bills of Mortality. London: Martyn, Allestry and Dicas. Facsimile in P. Laslett, ed., The Earliest Classics. Farnborough: Gregg International, 1973.Google Scholar

Greenwood, M. (1970). ‘Medical Statistics from Graunt to Farr’, in Pearson, E. S. and Kendall, M. G., eds., Studies in the History of Statistics and Probability. London: Griffin.Google Scholar

Hacking, I. (1990). The Taming of Chance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Halbwachs, M. (1912). La théorie de l’homme moyen. Essai sur Quetelet et la statistique. Paris: Alcan.Google Scholar

Haldane, J. B. S. (1970). ‘Karl Pearson, 1857–1936’, in Pearson, E. S. and Kendall, M. G., eds., Studies in the History of Statistics and Probability. London: Griffin.Google Scholar

Halley, E. (1693). ‘An Estimate of the Degrees of Mortality of Mankind, Drawn from Curious Tables of the Births and Funerals of the City of Breslaw’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, January. Facsimile in Cassedy, J., ed., Mortality in Pre-Industrial Times, the Contemporary Verdict. Farnborough: Gregg International. 1973.Google Scholar

Halsey, A. H. (1977). ‘Sociology as Political Arithmetic’, British Journal of Sociology, 45: 427–44.Google Scholar

Hammersley, M. (1989). The Dilemma of Qualitative Method: Herbert Blumer and the Chicago Tradition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hankins, F. H. (1908). Adolphe Quetelet as Statistician. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Hanushek, E. (1972). Education and Race. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Press.Google Scholar

Hauser, P. M. and Duncan, O. D. (1959). The Study of Population. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Hauser, R. M. (1976). ‘Review Essay: On Boudon’s Model of Social Mobility’, American Journal of Sociology, 81: 911–28.Google Scholar

Hauser, R. M. (1978). ‘A Structural Model of the Mobility Table’, Social Forces, 56: 919–53.Google Scholar

Hauser, R. M. (2007). ‘The Scientific Legacy of Otis Dudley Duncan’, Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 25: 97–100.Google Scholar

Hauser, R. M. (2017). ‘A Life in Sociology’, Annual Review of Sociology, 43: 1–8.Google Scholar

Hauser, R. M. and Warren, J. R. (1997). ‘Socioeconomic Indexes for Occupations: A Review, Update and Critique’, Sociological Methodology, 27: 177–298.Google Scholar

Hauser, R. M., Koffel, J. N., Travis, H. P. and Dickinson, P. J. (1975). ‘Temporal Change in Occupational Mobility: Evidence for Men in the United States’, American Sociological Review 40: 279–97.Google Scholar

Hayek, F. A. von (1937). ‘Economics and Knowledge’, Economica, 4: 33–54.Google Scholar

Heath, J. (2015). ‘Methodological Individualism’, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.Stanford.edu/archives/spr2015/.Google Scholar

Heckathorn, D. and Cameron, C. (2017). ‘Network Sampling: From Snowball and Multiplicity to Respondent-Driven Sampling’, Annual Review of Sociology, 43: 1101–19.Google Scholar

Heckman, J. J. (1996). ‘Themes in Coleman’s Research’, Postscript 1 to J. J. Heckman and D. Neal, ‘Coleman’s Contributions to Education: Theory, Research Styles and Empirical Research’, in Clark, J., ed., James S. Coleman. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar

Heckman, J. J. and Neal, D. (1996). ‘Coleman’s Contributions to Education: Theory, Research Styles and Empirical Research’, in Clark, J., ed., James S. Coleman. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar

Hedström, P. (2009). ‘The Analytical Turn in Sociology’, in Hedström, P. and Wittrock, B., eds., Frontiers of Sociology. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Hedström, P. and Swedberg, R. (1998). Social Mechanisms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hedström, P. and Bearman, P., eds. (2009a). The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hedström, P. and Bearman, P. (2009b). ‘What Is Analytical Sociology All About? An Introductory Essay’, in Hedström, P. and Bearman, P., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hedström, P. and Udehn, L. (2009). ‘Analytical Sociology and Theories of the Middle Range’, in Hedström, P. and Bearman, P., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hedström, P. and Ylikoski, , P. (2014). ‘Analytical Sociology and Rational-Choice Theory’, in Manzo, G., ed., Analytical Sociology: Actions and Networks. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar

Hennis, W. (1987). ‘A Science of Man: Max Weber and the Political Economy of the German Historical School’, in Mommsen, W. J. and Osterhammel, J., eds., Max Weber and His Contemporaries. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Hennock, E. P. (1987). ‘The Measurement of Urban Poverty: From the Metropolis to the Nation’, Economic History Review, 40: 206–27.Google Scholar

Hennock, E. P. (1991). ‘Concepts of Poverty in the British Social Surveys from Charles Booth to Arthur Bowley’, in Bulmer, M., Bales, K. and Sklar, K. K., eds., The Social Survey in Historical Perspective 1880–1940. Cambridge; Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hepple, L. W. (2001). ‘Multiple Regression and Spatial Policy Analysis: George Udny Yule and the Origins of Statistical Social Science’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 19: 385–407.Google Scholar

Hernes, G. (1989). ‘The Logic of the Protestant Ethic’, Rationality and Society, 1: 123–62.Google Scholar

Hernes, G. (1989). ‘Response to Coleman’, Rationality and Society, 1: 295–300.Google Scholar

Hernes, G. (1992). ‘We Are Smarter Than We Think’, Rationality and Society, 4: 421–36.Google Scholar

Hirsch, F. (1977). Social Limits to Growth. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Hirsch, F. and Goldthorpe, J. H. eds. (1978). The Political Economy of Inflation. Oxford: Martin Robertson.Google Scholar

Hobhouse, L. T., Wheeler, G. C. and Ginsberg, M. (1915). The Material Culture and Social Institutions of the Simpler Peoples. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar

Hogben, L. (1938). ‘Prolegomena to Political Arithmetic’, in Hogben, L., ed., Political Arithmetic: A Symposium of Population Studies. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Hollis, M. (1977). Models of Man. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Homans, G. C. (1958). ‘Social Behavior as Exchange’, American Journal of Sociology, 63: 597–606.Google Scholar

Homans, G. C. (1961). Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar

Hope, K. (1984). As Others See Us: Schooling and Social Mobility in Scotland and the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hope, K. (1992). ‘Barren Theory or Petty Craft? A Response to Professor Freedman’, in Shaffer, J. P., ed., The Role of Models in Nonexperimental Social Science: Two Debates. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association and American Statistical Association.Google Scholar

Hoppit, J. (1996). ‘Political Arithmetic in Eighteenth Century England’, Economic History Review, 49: 516–40.Google Scholar

Horton, R. (1993). Patterns of Thought in Africa and the West. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hout, M. (1983). Mobility Tables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Hyman, H. (1953). ‘The Value Systems of Different Classes: A Social Psychological Contribution to the Analysis of Stratification’, in Bendix, R. and Lipset, S. M., eds., Class, Status and Power. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar

Illari, P. M., Russo, F. and Williamson, J. (2011). Causality in the Sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Innes, J. (2009). Inferior Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Isambert, F. (1998). ‘La méthodologie de Marienthal’, in Lautmann, J. and Lécuyer, B.-P., eds., Paul Lazarsfeld (1901–1976): La sociologue de Vienne à New York. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar

Jackson, M. V., ed. (2013). Determined to Succeed? Performance versus Choice in Educational Attainment. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Jackson, M. V., Erikson, R., Goldthorpe, J. H. and Yaish, M. (2007). ‘Primary and Secondary Effects in Class Differentials in Educational Attainment’, Acta Sociologica, 50: 211–29.Google Scholar

Jahoda, G. (2015). ‘Quetelet and the Emergence of the Behavioural Sciences’, Springerplus, 4: 473, DOI:10.1186/s40064-015-1261-7.Google Scholar

Jahoda, M. (1998). ‘Paul Felix Lazarsfeld in Vienna’, in Lautmann, J. and Lécuyer, B.-P., eds., Paul Lazarsfeld (1901–1976): La sociologue de Vienne à New York. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar

Jahoda, M., Lazarsfeld, P. F. and Zeisel, H. (1932/1972). Marienthal: The Sociology of an Unemployed Community. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.Google Scholar

Jarvie, I. C. (1964). The Revolution in Anthropology. New York: Humanities Press.Google Scholar

Jencks, C. et al. (1972). Inequality. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Kalter, F. and Kroneberg, C. (2014). ‘Between Mechanism Talk and Mechanism Cult: New Emphases in Explanatory Sociology and Empirical Research’, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 54: 91–115.Google Scholar

Kandel, D. B. (1996). ‘Coleman’s Contribution to Understanding Youth and Adolescence’, in Clark, J., ed., James S. Coleman. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar

Katz, E. and Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1955). Personal Influence. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar

Kendall, P. and Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1950). ‘Problems of Survey Analysis’, in Merton, R. K. and Lazarsfeld, P. F., eds., Continuities in Social Research: Studies in the Scope and Method of ‘The American Soldier’. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar

Kerr, C., Dunlop, J. T., Harbison, F. H. and Myers, C. A. (1960). Industrialism and Industrial Man. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Keuschnigg, M., Lovsjö, N. and Hedström, P. (2017). ‘Analytical Sociology and Computational Social Science’, Journal of Computational Social Science, DOI:10.1007/S42001-017-0006-5.Google Scholar

Kevles, D. J. (1995) In the Name of Eugenics, 2nd ed., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Keynes, J. M. (1910). Review of Elderton and Pearson (1910), Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 73: 769–73.Google Scholar

Keynes, J. M. (1910–11/1983). Economic Articles and Correspondence Academic, ed. Moggridge, D.. London: Macmillan and Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Keynes, J. M. (1921/1973). A Treatise on Probability. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Keynes, J. M. (1939). ‘Professor Tinbergen’s Method’, Economic Journal, 49: 558–68.Google Scholar

Kiaer, A. N. (1895–6). ‘Observations et expériences concernant des dénombrements représentatifs’, Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute, 9: 176–83.Google Scholar

Kiaer, A. N. (1897/1976). The Representative Method of Statistical Surveys. Oslo: Central Bureau of Statistics of Norway.Google Scholar

Kiaer, A. N. (1903). ‘Sur les méthodes représentatives ou typologiques’, Bulletin of the International Statistical institute, 13: 66–70.Google Scholar

Kilgore, S. B. (2016). ‘The Life and Times of James S. Coleman’, Education Next, 16: 1–9.Google Scholar

King, G. (1696). Natural and Political Observations and Conclusions upon the State and Condition of England. Unpublished. Facsimile in Laslett, P., ed., The Earliest Classics. Farnborough: Gregg International, 1973.Google Scholar

Koertge, N. (1975). ‘Popper’s Metaphysical Research Program for the Human Sciences’, Inquiry, 18: 437–62.Google Scholar

Koertge, N. (1979). ‘The Methodological Status of Popper’s Rationality Principle’, Theory and Decision, 18: 83–95.Google Scholar

Kolakowski, L. (1972). Positive Philosophy. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

Kreager, P. (1988). ‘New Light on Graunt’, Population Studies, 42: 129–40.Google Scholar

Kreager, P. (2018). ‘The Emergence of Population’, in Hopwood, N., Flemming, R. and Kassell, L., eds., Reproduction: Antiquity to the Present Day. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Krüger, L., Gigerenzer, G. and Heidelberger, M., eds. (1987. The Probabilistic Revolution, vol. 1, Ideas in History. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Krüger, L., Gigerenzer, G. and Morgan, M., eds. (1987). The Probabilistic Revolution, vol. 2, Ideas in the Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Kruskal, W. and Mosteller, F. (1980). ‘Representative Sampling IV: The History of the Concept in Statistics, 1895–1939’, International Statistical Review, 48: 169–95.Google Scholar

Kuha, J. and Mills, C. (2020). ‘On Group Comparisons with Logistic Regression Models’, Sociological Methods and Research, 49: 498–525.Google Scholar

Lapie, P. (1904). ‘Les effets sociaux de l’école’, Revue scientifique, 41–2: 6–12, 42–6.Google Scholar

Laplace, P. S. (1814). Essai philosophique sur les probabilités. Paris: Courcier.Google Scholar

Landau, D. and Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1962). ‘Adolphe Quetelet’, in Sills, D., ed., International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. New York: Macmillan and Free Press.Google Scholar

Laslett, B. (1991). ‘Biography as Historical Sociology: The Case of William Fielding Ogburn’, Theory and Society, 20: 511–38.Google Scholar

Laslett, P. (1972). ‘Introduction: The History of the Family’, in Laslett, P., ed., Household and Family in Past Time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Laslett, P. (1973). ‘Introduction’, in Laslett, P., ed., The Earliest Classics. Farnborough: Gregg International.Google Scholar

Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1927). Statistisches Praktikum für Psychologen und Lehrer. Jena: Gustav Fischer.Google Scholar

Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1931). Jugend und Beruf. Jena: Gustav Fischer.Google Scholar

Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1940). Radio and the Printed Page. New York: Duell.Google Scholar

Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1950a). ‘The Logical and Mathematical Foundation of Latent Structure Analysis’, in Stouffer et al. (1950).Google Scholar

Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1950b). ‘The Interpretation and Computation of some Latent Structures’, in Stouffer et al. (1950).Google Scholar

Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1955). ‘Interpretation of Statistical Relations as a Research Operation’, in Lazarsfeld, P. F. and Rosenberg, M., eds., The Language of Social Research. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar

Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1961). ‘Notes on the History of Quantification in Sociology – Trends, Sources and Problems’, Isis, 52: 277–33.Google Scholar

Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1968). ‘Survey Analysis: The Analysis of Attribute Data’, in Sills, D., ed., International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. New York: Macmillan and Free Press.Google Scholar

Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1972a). ‘The Algebra of Dichotomous Systems’, in Lazarsfeld, P. F., Pasanella, A. K. and Rosenberg, M., eds., Continuities in the Language of Social Research. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1972b). ‘Mutual Effects of Statistical Variables’, in Lazarsfeld, P. F., Pasanella, A. K. and Rosenberg, M., eds., Continuities in the Language of Social Research. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1972c). Qualitative Analysis: Historical and Critical Essays. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar

Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1975). ‘Working with Merton’, in Coser, L. A., ed., The Idea of Social Structure: Papers in Honor of Robert K. Merton. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar

Lazarsfeld, P. F., Berelson, B. and Gaudet, H. (1944/1948). The People’s Choice. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Lazarsfeld, P. F. and Henry, N. W. (1968). Latent Structure Analysis. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Lazarsfeld, P. F. and Menzel, H. (1972). ‘On the Relation between Individual and Collective Properties’, in Lazarsfeld, P. F., Pasanella, A. K. and Rosenberg, M., eds., Continuities in the Language of Social Research. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Lazarsfeld, P. F. and Oberschall, A. R. (1965). ‘Max Weber and Empirical Social Research’, American Sociological Review, 30: 179–99.Google Scholar

Lazarsfeld, P. F., Pasanella, A. K. and Rosenberg, M., eds. (1972). Continuities in the Language of Social Research. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Lazarsfeld, P. F. and Thielens, W. (1958). The Academic Mind. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar

Le Bon, G. (1895). Psychologie des foules. Paris: Alcan.Google Scholar

Le Play, F. (1877–9). Les ouvriers européens, 2nd ed. Paris: Alfred Mamé.Google Scholar

Levine, D. N. (1995). Visions of the Sociological Tradition. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Lewin, K. (1951). Field Theory in Social Science. New York: Harper.Google Scholar

Lexis, W. (1874/1903). ‘Naturwissenschaft und Sozialwissenschaft’ in Abhandlungen zur Theorie der Bevölkerungs- und Moralstatistik. Jena: Fischer.Google Scholar

Lexis, W. (1875). Einleitung in die Theorie des Bevölkerungsstatistik. Strassburg: Trübner.Google Scholar

Lexis, W. (1879/1903). ‘Über die Theorie der Stabilität statistischer Reihen’ in Abhandlungen zur Theorie der Bevölkerungs- und Moralstatistik. Jena: Fischer.Google Scholar

Lie, E. (2002). ‘The Rise and Fall of Sample Surveys in Norway’, Science in Context, 15: 385–409.Google Scholar

Linsley, C. A. and Linsley, C. L. (1993). ‘Booth, Rowntree and Llewelyn Smith: A Reassessment of Interwar Poverty’, Economic History Review, 46: 86–104.Google Scholar

Lipset, S. M., Trow, M. A. and Coleman, J. S. (1956). Union Democracy: The Internal Politics of the International Typographical Union. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Lipset, S. M. and Bendix, R. (1959). Social Mobility in Industrial Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Little, D. (2012). ‘Analytical Sociology and the Rest of Sociology’, Sociologica, DOI:10.2383/36894.Google Scholar

Llewellyn Smith, H., ed. (1930–5). The New Survey of London Life and Labour. London: P. S. King.Google Scholar

Lottin, J. (1912). Quetelet, Statisticien et Sociologue. Louvain: Institut Supérieur de Philosophie.Google Scholar

MacKenzie, D. (1981). Statistics in Britain, 1865–1930: The Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Macy, M. W. and Willer, R. (2002). ‘From Factors to Actors: Computational Sociology and Agent-Based Modelling’, Annual Review of Sociology, 28: 143–66.Google Scholar

Macy, M. W. and Flache, A. (2009). ‘Social Dynamics from the Bottom Up: Agent-Based Models of Social Interaction’, in Hedström, P. and Bearman, P., eds., Analytical Sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Madge, J. (1963). The Origins of Scientific Sociology. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar

Magnello, M. E. (1999). ‘The Non-Correlation of Biometrics and Eugenics: Rival Forms of Laboratory Work in Karl Pearson’s Career at University College London’, History of Science, 37, Part 1: 79–106, Part 2: 124–47.Google Scholar

Manzo, G. (2012). ‘Reason-Based Explanations and Analytical Sociology: A Rejoinder to Boudon’, Revue européenne des sciences sociales, 50: 35–65.Google Scholar

Manzo, G. (2013). ‘Educational Choices and Social Interactions: A Formal Model and a Computational Test’, Comparative Social Research, 30: 47–100.Google Scholar

Manzo, G., ed. (2014a). Analytical Sociology: Actions and Networks. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar

Manzo, G. (2014b). ‘Introduction to Chapter 1’, in Manzo, G., G., ed., Analytical Sociology: Actions and Networks. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar

Marsden, P. V. (2005). ‘The Sociology of James S. Coleman’, Annual Review of Sociology, 31: 1–24.Google Scholar

Marshall, G. (1980). Presbyteries and Profits: Calvinism and the Development of Capitalism in Scotland, 1560–1707. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Marshall, G. (1982). In Search of the Spirit of Capitalism. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar

Maunder, W. F. (1977). ‘Sir Arthur Lyon Bowley (1867–1957)’, in Kendall, M. and Plackett, R. M., eds., Studies in the History of Statistics and Probability, vol 2. London: Charles Griffin.Google Scholar

Mayer-Schönberger, V. and Cukier, K. (2013). Big Data. London: Murray.Google Scholar

Mayr, E. (1982). The Growth of Biological Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Mayr, E. (2001). ‘The Philosophical Foundations of Darwinism’, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 145: 488–95.Google Scholar

Merllié, D. (1995). ‘Les travaux empiriques sur la mobilité sociale avant la Première Guerre mondiale’, Revue française de sociologie, 36: 5–31.Google Scholar

Merton, R. K. (1936). ‘The Unanticipated Consequence of Purposive Social Action’, American Sociological Review, 1: 894–904.Google Scholar

Merton, R. K. (1938). ‘Science, Technology and Society in Seventeenth Century England’, in Osiris: Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science and on the History of Learning and Culture. Bruges: St. Catherine Press.Google Scholar

Merton, R. K. (1940). ‘Fact and Factitiousness in Ethnic Questionnaires’, American Sociological Review, 5: 13–28,Google Scholar

Merton, R. K. (1945). ‘Sociological Theory’, American Journal of Sociology, 50: 462–73.Google Scholar

Merton, R. K. (1948). ‘The Position of Sociological Theory’, American Sociological Review, 13: 164–8.Google Scholar

Merton, R. K. (1949/1957). Social Theory and Social Structure. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar

Merton, R. K. (1967). On Theoretical Sociology. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Merton, R. K. (1968). ‘The Matthew Effect in Science’, Science, 159: 56–63.Google Scholar

Merton, R. K. (1973). The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Merton, R. K. (1975). ‘Structural Analysis in Sociology’, in Blau, P. M., ed., Approaches to the Study of Social Structure. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Merton, R. K. (1987). ‘Three Fragments from a Sociologist’s Notebooks: Establishing the Phenomenon, Specified Ignorance, and Strategic Research Materials’, Annual Review of Sociology, 13: 1–28.Google Scholar

Merton, R. K. (1996). ‘Teaching James Coleman’, Appendix 1 in Clark, J., ed., James S. Coleman. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar

Merton, R. K. (1998). ‘Working with Lazarsfeld: Notes and Contexts’, in Lautman, J. and Lécuyer, B.-P, eds., Paul Lazarsfeld (1901–1976): La sociologie de Vienne à New York. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar

Merton, R. K. and Kendall, P. L. (1946). ‘The Focused Interview’, American Journal of Sociology, 51: 541–57.Google Scholar

Merton, R. K. and Kitt, A. S. (1950). ‘Contributions to the Theory of Reference Group Behaviour’, in Merton, R. K. and Lazarsfeld, P. F., eds., Continuities in Social Research: Studies in the Scope and Method of ‘The American Soldier’. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar

Merton, R. K. and Lazarsfeld, P. F., eds., Continuities in Social Research: Studies in the Scope and Method of ‘The American Soldier’. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar

Merton, R. K., Coleman, J. S. and Rossi, P. H., eds. (1979). Qualitative and Quantitative Social Research: Papers in Honor of Paul F. Lazarsfeld. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Merton, R. K., Sills, D. L. and Stigler, S. M. (1984). ‘The Kelvin Dictum and Social Science: An Excursion into the History of an Idea’, Journal of the History of the Behavioural Sciences, 20: 319–31.Google Scholar

Mesure, S., ed. (1998). La rationalité des valeurs. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Michels, R. (1911/1949). Political Parties. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar

Mill, J. S. (1843/1973–4). ‘A System of Logic Ratiocinative and Inductive’, in Robson, J. M., ed., Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

Mills, C. (2014). ‘The Great British Class Fiasco’, Sociology, 48: 437–44.Google Scholar

Mills, T. C. (2017). A Statistical Biography of George Udny Yule: A Loafer of the World. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar

Mises, L. von (1949). Human Action. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Moggridge, D. E. (1992). Maynard Keynes: An Economist’s Biography. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Moreno, J. L. (1934). Who Shall Survive? New York: Beacon House.Google Scholar

Morgan, S. L. and Winship, C. (2007). Counterfactuals and Causal Inference: Methods and Principles for Social Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Morin, J.-M. (2006). Boudon, un sociologue classique. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar

Morrison, D. (1978). ‘Kultur and Culture: The Case of Theodor W. Adorno and Paul F. Lazarsfeld’, Social Research, 45: 331–55.Google Scholar

Mosselmans, B. (2005). ‘Adolphe Quetelet, the Average Man and the Development of Economic Methodology’, European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 12: 565–82.Google Scholar

Neurath, P. (1998). ‘The Life and Work of Paul Lazarsfeld’, in Lautman, J. and Lécuyer, B.-P., eds., Paul Lazarsfeld (1901–1976): La sociologue de Vienne à New York. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar

Neyman, J. (1934). ‘On the Two Different Aspects of the Representative Method: The Method of Stratified Sampling and the Method of Purposive Selection’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 97: 558–606 (with discussion).Google Scholar

Neyman, J. (1952). Lectures and Conferences on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar

Neyman, J. (1974). ‘Study of Chance Mechanisms – A Quasi-Copernican Revolution in Science and Mathematics’, in Neyman, J., ed., The Heritage of Copernicus. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Nisbet, R. A. (1966). The Sociological Tradition. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Oberschall, A. R. (1965). Empirical Social Research in Germany, 1848–1914. Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar

Oberschall, A. R. (1987). ‘The Two Empirical Roots of Social Theory and the Probability Revolution’, in Krüger, L., Gigerenzer, G. and Morgan, M. S., eds., The Probabilistic Revolution, vol. 2. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Offenbacher, M. (1900). Konfession und soziale Schichtung. Eine Studie über die Wirtschaftliche Lage der Katholiken und Protestanten in Baden. Tübingen and Leipzig: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).Google Scholar

Ogburn, W. F. (1912/1964). ‘Progress and Uniformity in Child-Labor Legislation’, in Duncan, O. D., ed., William F. Ogburn on Culture and Social Change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Ogburn, W. F. (1922). Social Change with Respect to Culture and Original Nature. New York: Huebsch.Google Scholar

Ogburn, W. F. (1923). ‘The Fluctuations of Business as Social Forces’, Journal of Social Forces, 1: 73–8.Google Scholar

Ogburn, W. F. (1927). ‘Sociology and Statistics’, in Ogburn, W. F. and Goldenweiser, A., eds., The Social Sciences and their Interrelations. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Ogburn, W. F. (1930a). ‘Three Obstacles to the Development of a Scientific Sociology’, Social Forces, 8: 347–50.Google Scholar

Ogburn, W. F. (1930b). ‘The Folkways of a Scientific Sociology’, Publications of the American Sociological Society, 24: 1–11.Google Scholar

Ogburn, W. F. (1933). ‘A Reply’, Journal of Political Economy, 41: 210–21.Google Scholar

Ogburn, W. F. (1935). ‘Recent Changes in Marriage’, American Journal of Sociology, 41: 285–98.Google Scholar

Ogburn, W. F. (1955). ‘Some Observations on Sociological Research’, Social Forces, 34: 10–18.Google Scholar

Ogburn, W. F. and Hill, E. (1935). ‘Income Classes and the Roosevelt Vote in 1932’, Political Science Quarterly, 50: 186–93.Google Scholar

Ogburn, W. F. and Nimkoff, M. F. (1940). Sociology. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Ogburn, W. F. and Peterson, D. (1916). ‘Political Thought of Social Classes’, Political Science Quarterly, 31: 300–17.Google Scholar

Ogburn, W. F. and Talbot, N. S. (1929). ‘A Measurement of the Factors in the Presidential Election of 1928’, Social Forces, 8: 175–83.Google Scholar

Ogburn, W. F. and Thomas, D. S. (1922). ‘The Influence of the Business Cycle on Certain Social Conditions’, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 18: 324–40.Google Scholar

Olson, M. (1965). The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Opp, K.-D. (2013). ‘What Is Analytical Sociology? Strengths and Weaknesses of a New Sociological Research Paradigm’, Social Science Information, 52: 329–60.Google Scholar

Park, D. K., Gelman, A. and Bafumi, J. (2004). ‘Bayesian Multilevel Estimation with Poststratification: State-Level Estimates from National Polls’, Political Analysis, 12: 375–85.Google Scholar

Park, R. E. and Burgess, E. W. (1921). Introduction to the Science of Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Parsons, T. (1937). The Structure of Social Action. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar

Parsons, T. (1951). The Social System. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar

Pavlinov, I. Y. (2013). The Species Problem – Ongoing Issues. Rijeka: IntechOpen.Google Scholar

Pawson, R. (2009). ‘On the Shoulders of Merton: Boudon as the Modern Guardian of Middle-Range Theory’, in Cherkaoui, M. and Hamilton, P., eds., Raymond Boudon: A Life in Sociology. Oxford: Bardwell Press.Google Scholar

Pearson, K. (1892). The Grammar of Science. London: Walter Scott.Google Scholar

Pearson, K. (1904). On the Theory of Contingency and Its Relation to Association and Normal Correlation. London: Dulau.Google Scholar

Pearson, K. (1910). The Influence of Parental Alcoholism on the Physique and Ability of the Offspring: A Reply to the Cambridge Economists. London: Dulau.Google Scholar

Pearson, K. (1914, 1925, 1930). The Life, Letters and Labours of Francis Galton, 3 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Pearson, K., with Pearson, E. S., ed. (1977). The History of Statistics in the 17th and 18th Centuries. London: Charles Griffin.Google Scholar

Pearson, K. and Elderton, E. M. (1910). A Second Study of the Influence of Parental Alcoholism on the Physique and Intelligence of the Offspring. London: Dulau.Google Scholar

Perrin, E. (1904). ‘On the Contingency between Occupations in the Case of Fathers and Sons’, Biometrika, 3: 467–9.Google Scholar

Pettigrew, A. (2015). ‘Samuel Stouffer and Relative Deprivation’, Social Psychological Quarterly, 78: 7–24.Google Scholar

Petty, W. (1683). Observations on the Dublin-Bills of Mortality. London: Mark Pardoe.Google Scholar

Pfautz, H. W. and Duncan, O. D. (1950). ‘A Critical Evaluation of Warner’s Work in Community Stratification’, American Sociological Review, 15: 205–15.Google Scholar

Piekalkiewicz, J. (1934). Rapport sur les recherches concernant la structure de la population ouvrière en Pologne selon la méthode representative (French résumé of Polish text). Warsaw: Institute for Social Problems.Google Scholar

Pigou, A. C. (1910). ‘Memorandum on Some Economic Aspects and Effects of Poor Law Relief’, Royal Commission on the Poor Laws and Relief of Distress, vol. 9, Appendix 80. London: HMSO.Google Scholar

Pigou, A. C. (1911). ‘Alcoholism and Heredity’, Westminster Gazette, February 2.Google Scholar

Platt, J. (1985). ‘Weber’s Verstehen and the History of Qualitative Research’, British Journal of Sociology, 36: 448–66.Google Scholar

Platt, J. (1986). ‘Functionalism and the Survey: The Relation of Theory and Method’, Sociological Review, 34: 501–36.Google Scholar

Pollak, M. (1980). ‘Paul F. Lazarsfeld: A Sociointellectual Biography’, Knowledge, Diffusion, Utilization, 2: 157–77.Google Scholar

Popper, K. R. (1934/1959). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar

Popper, K. R. (1945). The Open Society and Its Enemies. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Popper, K. R. (1957). The Poverty of Historicism. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Popper, K. R. (1976). Unended Quest: An Intellectual Autobiography. Glasgow: Fontana Collins.Google Scholar

Popper, K. R. (1994). The Myth of the Framework. London; Routledge.Google Scholar

Porter, T. M. (1982). ‘A Statistical Survey of Gases: Maxwell’s Social Physics’, Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences’, 8: 77–116.Google Scholar

Porter, T. M. (1986). The Rise of Statistical Thinking 1820–1900. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Porter, T. M. (2004). Karl Pearson: The Scientific Life in a Statistical Age. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

President’s Research Committee on Social Trends (1933). Recent Social Trends in the United States. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Prévost, J.-G. (2009). A Total Science: Statistics in Liberal and Fascist Italy. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar

Quetelet, A. (1835/1842). A Treatise on Man and the Development of His Faculties. Edinburgh: Chambers.Google Scholar

Quetelet, A. (1846). Lettres à S.A.R. le Duc Regnant de Saxe-Cobourg et Gotha, sur la théorie des probabilités appliquée aux sciences morales et politiques. Brussels: Hayez.Google Scholar

Quetelet, A. (1869). Physique sociale, ou essai sur le développement des facultés de l’homme. Brussels: Muquardt.Google Scholar

Raab, W. and Voss, T. (2017). ‘Micro–macro Models in Sociology: Antecedents of Coleman’s Diagram’, in Jann, B. and Przepiorka, W., eds., Social Dilemmas, Institutions, and the Evolution of Cooperation. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Radkau, J. (2009). Max Weber: A Biography. London: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Rasch, G. (1960/1980). Probabilistic Models for some Intelligence and Attainment Tests. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Rasch, G. (1968). ‘An Individualistic Approach to Item Analysis’, in Lazarsfeld, P. F. and Henry, N. W., eds., Readings in Mathematical Social Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Ravitch, D. (1993). ‘The Coleman Reports and American Education’, in Sørensen, A. B. and Spilerman, S., eds., Social Theory and Social Policy: Essays in Honor of James S. Coleman. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar

Reid, C. (1982). Neyman – From Life. New York: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar

Renwick, C. (2012). British Sociology’s Lost Biological Roots: A History of Futures Past. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Renwick, C. (2019). ‘Richard Titmuss, Eugenics and Social Science in Mid-twentieth Century Britain’, in Panayotova, P., ed., The History of Sociology in Britain: New Research and Revaluation. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Robinson, W. S. (1950). ‘Ecological Correlations and the Behavior of Individuals’, American Sociological Review, 15: 351–7.Google Scholar

Rock, P. (1979). The Making of Symbolic Interactionism. Totowa: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar

Rogoff, N. (1953). Recent Trends in Occupational Mobility. Free Press: New York.Google Scholar

Rowntree, B. S. (1901). Poverty: A Study of Town Life. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Ryan, J. W. (2013). Samuel Stouffer and the GI Survey: Sociologists and Soldiers during the Second World War. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar

Sagalnik, M. J. (2018). Bit by Bit: Social Research in the Digital Age. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Santoro, M. (2017). ‘The Gini-Merton Connection: An Episode in the History of Sociology and Its International Circulation’, Sociologica, DOI: 10.2383/89511.Google Scholar

Sarton, G. (1935). ‘Preface’, Isis, 23: 6–24.Google Scholar

Savage, M. et al. (2013). ‘A New Model of Social Class? Findings from the BBC’s Great Class Survey Experiment’, Sociology, 47: 219–50.Google Scholar

Savage, M. and Burrows, R. (2007). ‘The Coming Crisis of Empirical Sociology’, Sociology, 41: 885–99.Google Scholar

Schad, S. P. (1972). Empirical Social Research in Weimar-Germany. Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar

Schelling, T. (1971). ‘Dynamic Models of Segregation’, Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1: 143–86.Google Scholar

Schumpeter, J. A. (1908). ‘On the Concept of Social Value’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 23: 213–32.Google Scholar

Schumpeter, J. A. (1954). A History of Economic Analysis. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Schütz, A. (1932/1967). The Phenomenology of the Social World. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar

Selvin, H. C. (1968). ‘Methods of Survey Analysis’, in Sills, D., ed., International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. New York: Macmillan and Free Press.Google Scholar

Selvin, H. C. (1975). ‘On Formalizing Theory’, in Coser, L. A., ed. The Idea of Social Structure: Papers in Honor of Robert K. Merton. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar

Selvin, H. C. (1976). ‘Durkheim, Booth and Yule: The Non-Diffusion of an Intellectual Innovation’, Archives européennes de sociologie, 17: 39–51.Google Scholar

Seng, Y. P. (1951). ‘Historical Survey of Sampling Theory and Practice’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 114: 214–31.Google Scholar

Sills, D. (1998). ‘The Lazarsfeld Story as Genre’, in Lautman, J. and Lécuyer, B.-P, eds., Paul Lazarsfeld (1901–1976): La sociologie de Vienne à New York. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar

Sills, D. L. (1979). ‘Lazarsfeld, Paul F.’, in Sills, D. L., ed., International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, vol. 18, Biographical Supplement. New York: Free PressGoogle Scholar

Silver, C., ed. (1982). Frédéric Le Play on Family, Work and Social Change. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Simon, H. A. (1979). ‘The Meaning of Causal Ordering’, in Merton, R. K., Coleman, J. S. and Rossi, P. H., eds., Qualitative and Quantitative Social Research: Papers in Honor of Paul F. Lazarsfeld. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Singerman, D. R. (2016). ‘Keynesian Eugenics and the Goodness of the World’, Journal of British Studies, 55: 538–66.Google Scholar

Skidelsky, R. (1983). John Maynard Keynes: Hopes Betrayed 1883–1920. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Skog, O.-J. (1991). ‘Alcohol and Suicide – Durkheim Revisited’, Acta Sociologica, 34: 193–206.Google Scholar

Smelser, N. J. (1986). ‘The Ogburn Vision Fifty Years Later’, in Smelser, N. J. and Gerstein, D. R., eds., Behavioral and Social Science: Fifty Years of Discovery. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar

Smith, H., Pettigrew, T. F., Pippin, G. and Bialosiewicz, S. (2012). ‘Relative Deprivation: A Theoretical and Meta-Analytic Critique’, Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16: 203–32.Google Scholar

Smith, T. M. F. (1997). ‘Social Surveys and Social Science’, Canadian Journal of Statistics, 25: 23–44.Google Scholar

Sobel, M., Hout, M. and Duncan, O. D. (1985). ‘Exchange, Structure and Symmetry in Occupational Mobility’, American Journal of Sociology, 91: 359–72.Google Scholar

Sofer, R. N. (1982). ‘Why Do Disciplines Fail? The Strange Case of British Sociology’, English Historical Review, 97: 767–802.Google Scholar

Sorokin, P. A. (1933). ‘Recent Social Trends: A Criticism’, Journal of Political Economy, 41: 194–210.Google Scholar

Spiegelhalter, D. (2019). The Art of Statistics: Learning from Data. London: Penguin Random House.Google Scholar

Sprat, T. (1667/1734). The History of the Royal Society of London for the Improvement of Natural Knowledge. London: Martyn and Allestry.Google Scholar

Stadtfeld, C., Holloway, J. and Block, P. (2017). ‘Dynamic Network Actor Models: Investigating Coordination Ties through Time’, Sociological Methodology, 47: 1–40.Google Scholar

Stevens, S. S. (1946). ‘On the Theory of Scales of Measurement’, Science, 103: 677–80.Google Scholar

Stevens, S. S. (1975). Psychophysics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Stigler, S. M. (1986). The History of Statistics: The Measurement of Uncertainty before 1900. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Stigler, S. M. (1999). Statistics on the Table. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Stigler, S. M. (2002) ‘The Missing Early History of Contingency Tables’, Annales de la faculté des sciences de Toulouse, 6e serie, 11: 563–73.Google Scholar

Stigler, S. M. (2012). ‘Karl Pearson and the Rule of Three’, Biometrika, 99: 1–14.Google Scholar

Stigler, S. M. (2016). The Seven Pillars of Statistical Wisdom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Stinchcombe, A. L. (1993). ‘The Conditions of Fruitfulness of Theorizing about Mechanisms in Social Science’, in Sørensen, A. B. and Spilerman, S., eds., Social Theory and Social Policy: Essays in Honor of James S. Coleman. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar

Stone, R. (1997). Some British Empiricists in the Social Sciences, 1650–1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Stouffer, S. A. (1931). ‘Experimental Comparison of a Statistical and a Case History Technique of Attitude Research’, Publications of the American Sociological Society, 25: 154–6.Google Scholar

Stouffer, S. A. (1934). ‘Sociology and Sampling’, in Bernard, L. L., ed., The Fields and Methods of Sociology. New York: Long and Smith.Google Scholar

Stouffer, S. A. (1935). ‘Statistical Induction in Rural Social Research’, Social Forces, 4: 505–15.Google Scholar

Stouffer, S. A. (1950). ‘Some Afterthoughts of a Contributor to “The American Soldier”’ in Merton, R. K. and Lazarsfeld, P. F., eds., Continuities in Social Research: Studies in the Scope and Method of ‘The American Soldier’. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar

Stouffer, S. A. (1951). ‘An Empirical Study of Technical Problems in Analysis of Role Obligation’, in Parsons, T. and Shils, E. A., eds., Toward a General Theory of Action. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Stouffer, S. A. (1955). Communism, Conformity and Civil Liberties. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar

Stouffer, S. A. (1958). ‘Karl Pearson – An Appreciation on the 100th Anniversary of His Birth’, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 53: 23–7.Google Scholar

Stouffer, S. A. (1962). Social Research to Test Ideas. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar

Stouffer, S. A. and Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1937). Research Memorandum on the Family in the Depression. New York: Social Science Research Council.Google Scholar

Stouffer, S. A. et al. (1949). Studies in Social Psychology in World War II, vol. 1, The American Soldier: Adjustment during Army Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Stouffer, S. A. et al. (1949). Studies in Social Psychology in World War II, vol. 2, The American Soldier: Combat and Its Aftermath. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Stouffer, S. A. et al. (1950). Studies in Social Psychology in World War II, vol. 4, Measurement and Prediction. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Sturgis, P. et al. (2015). Report of the Inquiry into the 2015 British General Election Opinion Polls. London: British Polling Council and the Market Research Society.Google Scholar

Sullivan, P. A. (1998). ‘An Engineer Dissects Two Case Studies: Hayles on Fluid Mechanics and MacKenzie on Statistics’, in Koertge, N., ed., A House Built on Sand. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Surowiecki, J. S. (2005). The Wisdom of Crowds. London: Abacus.Google Scholar

Süssmilch, J. P. (1741). Die göttliche Ordnung in den Veränderungen des menschlichen Geschlechts aus der Geburt, dem Tode und der Fortpflanzung deselben erwiesen. Berlin: Verlag des Buchladens der Realschule.Google Scholar

Sutherland, I. (1963). ‘John Graunt: A Tercentenary Tribute’, Journal of the Royal Stati1stical Society, Series A, 126: 537–56.Google Scholar

Swedberg, R. (1990). Economics and Sociology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Swedberg, R. (2001). ‘Sociology and Game Theory: Contemporary and Historical Perspectives’, Theory and Society, 30: 301–35.Google Scholar

Sztompka, P. (1986). Robert K. Merton: An Intellectual Profile. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Taussig, F. W. and Joslyn, C. S. (1932). American Business Leaders. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Thomas, W. I. and Znaniecki, F. (1918–20). The Polish Peasant in Europe and America. Boston: R. G. Badger.Google Scholar

Thompson, W. (1889). Popular Lectures and Addresses. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Toby, J. (1980). ‘Samuel A. Stouffer: Social Research as a Calling’, in Merton, R. K. and Riley, M. W., eds., Sociological Traditions from Generation to Generation. Norwood: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar