Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-07T10:46:51.082Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Select Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2024

Carmen Draghici
Carmen Draghici
Affiliation:
City University London
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Procreative Rights in International Law
Insights from the European Court of Human Rights
 , pp. 311 - 318
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Select Bibliography

Achmad, Claire, ‘Children’s Rights to the Fore in the European Court of Human Rights’ First International Commercial Surrogacy Judgments’ (2014) 6 European Human Rights Law Review 638–646.Google Scholar
Allan, Sonia, ‘The Surrogate in Commercial Surrogacy: Legal and Ethical Considerations’, in Gerber, Paula and O’Byrne, Katie (eds.), Surrogacy, Law and Human Rights (London: Routledge, 2015) 113–143.Google Scholar
Andorno, Roberto, ‘Global Bioethics and Human Rights’ (2008) 27(1) Medicine and Law 1–14.Google ScholarPubMed
Annas, George, American Bioethics: Crossing Human Rights and Health Law Boundaries (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Anomaly, Jonathan, Creating Future People: The Ethics of Genetic Enhancement (New York: Routledge, 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archard, David, and Benatar, David, ‘Introduction’, in Archard, David and Benatar, David (eds.), Procreation and Parenthood: The Ethics of Bearing and Rearing Children (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010) 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asch, Adrienne, ‘Prenatal Diagnosis and Selective Abortion: A Challenge to Practice and Policy’ (1999) 89(11) American Journal of Public Health 1649–1657, reprinted in Helga Kuhse, Udo Schüklenk and Peter Singer (eds.), Bioethics: An Anthology (Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2016, 3rd ed.) 112–126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ashcroft, Richard, ‘Could Human Rights Supersede Bioethics?’ (2010) 10(4) Human Rights Law Review 639–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashcroft, Richard, ‘The Troubled Relationship Between Bioethics and Human Rights’, in Freeman, Michael (ed.), Law and Bioethics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008) 31-–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bainham, Andrew, ‘Whose Sperm Is It Anyway?’ (2003) 62(3) Cambridge Law Journal 566–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Robert, ‘Bioethics and Human Rights: A Historical Perspective’ (2001) 10 Cambridge Quarterly of Health & Ethics 241–252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartholet, Elizabeth, Family Bonds: Adoption and the Politics of Parenting (Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 1993).Google Scholar
Beauchamps, Tom, and Childress, James, Principles of Biomedical Ethics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019, 8th ed.).Google Scholar
Beaumont, Paul, and Trimmings, Katarina, ‘Surrogacy before the European Court of Human Rights’, in Scherpe, Jens, Fenton-Glynn, Claire and Kaan, Terry (eds.), Eastern and Western Perspectives on Surrogacy (Cambridge: Intersentia, 2019) 331–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biggs, Hazel, ‘The Quest for a Perfect Child’, in Horsey, Kirsty and Biggs, Hazel (eds.), Human Fertilisation and Embryology: Reproducing Regulation (London: Routledge-Cavendish, 2007) 1–16.Google Scholar
Biondi, Stefano, ‘Access to Medical-Assisted [sic] Reproduction and PGD in Italian Law: A Deadly Blow to an Illiberal Statute? Commentary to the European Court on [sic] Human Rights’s [sic] Decision Costa and Pavan v Italy (ECtHR, 28 August 2012, App. 54270/2010)’ (2013) 21 Medical Law Review 474–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bomhoff, Jacco, and Zucca, Lorenzo, ‘The Tragedy of Ms Evans: Conflicts and Incommensurability of Rights, Evans v the United Kingdom, Fourth Section Judgment of 7 March 2006, Application No 6339/05’ (2006) 2(3) European Constitutional Law Review 424–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boonin, David, The Non-identity Problem and the Ethics of Future People (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boucai, Michael, ‘Is Assisted Procreation an LGBT Right?’ (2016) (6) Wisconsin Law Review 1065–1125.Google Scholar
Bracken, Lydia, ‘The ECtHR’s First Advisory Opinion: Implications for Cross-Border Surrogacy Involving Male Intended Parents’ (2021) 21(1) Medical Law International 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bracken, Lydia, Same-Sex Parenting and Best Interests (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brännmark, Johan, ‘Respect for Persons in Bioethics: Towards a Human Rights-Based Account’ (2017) 18 Human Rights Review 171–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braude, Peter, Pickering, Susan, Flinter, Frances, and Mackie Ogilvie, Caroline, ‘Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis’ (2002) 3(12) Nature Reviews: Genetics 941–953.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bridge, Stuart, ‘Assisted Reproduction and the Legal Definition of Parentage’, in Bainham, Andrew, Day-Sclater, Shelley and Richards, Martin (eds.), What Is a Parent? A Socio-Legal Analysis (Oxford: Hart, 1999) 73–88.Google Scholar
Brownsword, Roger, ‘Human Dignity, Ethical Pluralism, and the Regulation of Modern Biotechnologies’, in Murphy, Thérèse (ed.), New Technologies and Human Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009) 19–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brudney, Daniel, ‘Is Health Care a Human Right?’ (2016) 37 Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 249–257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burley, Justine, ‘The Price of Eggs: Who Should Bear the Costs of Fertility Treatments?’, in Harris, John and Holm, Søren (eds.), The Future of Human Reproduction: Ethics, Choice, and Regulation (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998) 127–149.Google Scholar
Buxton, Jess, ‘Unforeseen Uses of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis: Ethical and Legal Issues’, in Horsey, Kirsty and Biggs, Hazel (eds.), Human Fertilisation and Embryology: Reproducing Regulation (London: Routledge-Cavendish, 2007) 109–134.Google Scholar
Cohen, Alma, Dehejia, Rajeev, and Romanov, Dmitri, ‘Financial Incentives and Fertility’ (2013) 95(1) Review of Economics and Statistics 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, Rachel, ‘Donating Parenthood: Perspectives on Parenthood from Surrogacy and Gamete Donation’, in Bainham, Andrew, Day-Sclater, Shelley and Richards, Martin (eds.), What Is a Parent? A Socio-legal Analysis (Oxford: Hart, 1999) 121–136.Google Scholar
Cook, Rebecca, Dickens, Bernard, and Fathalla, Mahmood, Reproductive Health and Human Rights: Integrating Medicine, Ethics, and Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coussirat-Coustère, Vincent, ‘Famille et Convention Européenne des Droits de l’Homme’, in Mahoney, Paul and Ryssdal, Rolv (eds.), Protection des droits de l’homme: la perspective européenne. Mélanges à la mémoire de Rolv Ryssdl (Cologne: Carl Heymanns, 2000) 281–307.Google Scholar
de Jong, Antina, Dondorp, Wybo, de Die-Smulders, Christine, Frints, Suzanne, and de Wert, Guido, ‘Non-invasive Prenatal Testing: Ethical Issues Explored’ (2010) 18 European Journal of Human Genetics 272–277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deech, Ruth, ‘Family Law and Genetics’ (1998) 61(5) Modern Law Review 697–715.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deech, Ruth and Smajdor, Anna, From IVF to Immortality: Controversy in the Era of Reproductive Technology (Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiSilvestro, Russell, ‘Reproductive Autonomy, the Non-identity Problem, and the Non-person Problem’ (2009) 23(1) Bioethics 59–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Douglas, Gillian, Law, Fertility and Reproduction (London: Sweet and Maxwell, 1991).Google Scholar
Douglas, Gillian, ‘The Intention To Be a Parent and the Making of Mothers’ (1994) 57 Modern Law Review 636–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draghici, Carmen, ‘Adoption and the European Court of Human Rights: From Laissez-Faire to Judicial Law-Making’, in Panella, Lina and Spatafora, Ersiliagrazia (eds.), Studi in onore di Claudio Zanghì (Turin: Giappichelli, 2011) 255–282.Google Scholar
Draghici, Carmen, ‘Assisted Dying’, in Loveland, Ian (ed.), Canadian and British Public Law in Comparative Perspective (Oxford: Hart, 2021) 25–74.Google Scholar
Draghici, Carmen, ‘Equal Marriage, Unequal Civil Partnership: A Bizarre Case of Discrimination in Europe’ (2017) 29(4) Child and Family Law Quarterly 313–334.Google Scholar
Draghici, Carmen, The Legitimacy of Family Rights in Strasbourg Case Law: ‘Living Instrument’ or Extinguished Sovereignty? (Oxford: Hart, 2017).Google Scholar
Draghici, Carmen, ‘Putative Fathers in English Law: A Human Rights Perspective’, in Gilmore, Stephen and Sherpe, Jens (eds.), Family Matters: Essays in Honour of John Eekelaar (Cambridge: Intersentia, 2022) 595–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draghici, Carmen, ‘The Strasbourg Court between European and Local Consensus: Anti-democratic or Guardian of Democratic Process?’ (2017) Public Law 11–29.Google Scholar
Draghici, Carmen, ‘Unplanned Fatherhood Is Not Sperm Donation: An Unduly Moralistic Approach to Natural Fathers in ECHR Case Law’ (2022) 2 Child and Family Law Quarterly 123–147.Google Scholar
Draghici, Carmen and Woods, Lorna, ‘Killing Journalists Is Not Media Regulation: Private Rights, Collective Wrongs and the Impact of Impunity’ (2019) 28(2) Transnational Law and Contemporary Problems 263–306.Google Scholar
Ebtehaj, Fatemeh, ‘Introduction: Regulating Relationships?’, in Ebtehaj, Fatemeh, Lindley, Bridget and Richards, Martin (eds.), Kinship Matters (Oxford: Hart, 2006) 1–16.Google Scholar
Erdman, Joanna, ‘Abortion in International Human Rights Law’, in Rowlands, Sam (ed.), Abortion Care (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014) 244–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrelly, Colin, ‘Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis, Reproductive Freedom, and Deliberative Democracy’ (2009) 34(2) Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 135–154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fenton, Elizabeth, ‘Genetic Enhancement: A Threat to Human Rights?’ (2008) 22(1) Bioethics 1–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finch, Janet, ‘Kinship as “Family” in Contemporary Britain’, in Ebtehaj, Fatemeh, Lindley, Bridget and Richards, Martin (eds.), Kinship Matters (London: Hart, 2006) 295–306.Google Scholar
Francis, Leslie, ‘Is Surrogacy Ethically Problematic?’, in Francis, Leslie (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Reproductive Ethics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017) 388–406.Google Scholar
Gallus, Nicole, ‘La procréation médicalement assistée et la jurisprudence de la Court européenne des droits de l’homme’, in Gallus, Nicole (ed.), Droit des familles, genre et sexualité (Limal: Anthemis, 2012) 203–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, Paula and O’Byrne, Katie, ‘Souls in the House of Tomorrow: The Rights of Children Born via Surrogacy’, in Gerber, Paula and O’Byrne, Katie (eds.), Surrogacy, Law and Human Rights (London: Routledge, 2015) 81–112.Google Scholar
Gilbar, Roy, ‘Between Unconditional Acceptance and Responsibility: Should Family Ethics Limit the Scope of Reproductive Autonomy?’ (2009) 21(3) Child and Family Law Quarterly 309–335.Google Scholar
Giles, Jessica and Lee, Simon, ‘Parrillo v Italy: Is There Life in the European Court of Human Rights?’ (2016) 5(1) Oxford Journal of Law and Religion 162–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillott, John, ‘Screening for Disability: A Eugenic Pursuit?’ (2001) 27(suppl. 2) Journal of Medical Ethics ii21–ii23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glover, Jonathan, Choosing Children: Genes, Disability, and Design (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorsuch, Neil, The Future of Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Greenfeld, Dorothy and Seli, Emre, ‘Assisted Reproduction in Same Sex Couples’, in Sauer, Mark (ed.), Principles of Oocyte and Embryo Donation (London: Springer-Verlag, 2013) 289–301, reprinted in Helga Kuhse, Udo Schüklenk and Peter Singer (eds.), Bioethics: An Anthology (Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2016, 3rd ed.) 74–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, David, O’Boyle, Michael, Bates, Ed, and Buckley, Carla, Harris, O’Boyle & Warbrick: Law of the European Convention on Human Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014, 3rd ed.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, David, O’Boyle, Michael and Warbrick, Colin, Law of the European Convention on Human Rights (London: Butterworths, 1995).Google Scholar
Harris, John, ‘No Sex Selection Please, We’re British’ (2005) 31 Journal of Medical Ethics 286–288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, John, ‘Sex Selection and Regulated Hatred’ (2005) 31 Journal of Medical Ethics 291–294.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herring, Jonathan, Family Law (Harlow: Pearson, 2021, 10th ed.).Google Scholar
Hevia, Martín and Constantin, Andrés, ‘Gendered Power Relations and Informed Consent: The I.V. v. Bolivia Case’ (2018) 20(2) Health and Human Rights Journal 197–203.Google ScholarPubMed
Holm, Søren, ‘Ethical Issues in Pre-implantation Diagnosis’, in Harris, John and Holm, Søren (eds.), The Future of Human Reproduction: Ethics, Choice, and Regulation (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998) 176–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurst, Hannum, Rescuing Human Rights: A Radically Moderate Approach (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019).Google Scholar
Hurst, Palmer and Hurst, Christina, ‘Baby Steps: The European Court of Human Rights Moves Closer to Protecting the Unborn in Parrillo v. Italy’ (2015) 2 Journal of Global Justice and Public Policy 155–163.Google Scholar
Iliadou, Marianna, ‘Surrogacy and the ECtHR: Reflections on Paradiso and Campanelli v Italy’ (2018) 27(1) Medical Law Review 144–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Emily, ‘Abortion, Autonomy and Prenatal Diagnosis’ (2000) 9(4) Social and Legal Studies 467–494.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jackson, Emily, Regulating Reproduction: Law, Technology and Autonomy (Oxford: Hart, 2001).Google Scholar
Khazova, Olga, ‘Some Reflections on a European Court Case: Nazarenko v. Russia’, in Scherpe, Jens and Gilmore, Stephen (eds.), Family Matters: Essays in Honour of John Eekelaar (Cambridge: Intersentia, 2022) 612–621.Google Scholar
Kilkelly, Ursula, ‘Protecting Children’s Rights under the ECHR: The Role of Positive Obligations’ (2010) 61(3) Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly 245–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, David, ‘Why We Should Not Permit Embryos to Be Selected as Tissue Donors’ (August 2003) 190 Bulletin of Medical Ethics 13–16, reprinted in Helga Kuhse, Udo Schüklenk and Peter Singer (eds.), Bioethics: An Anthology (Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2016, 3rd ed.) 152–155.Google Scholar
Knowles, Lori, ‘The Lingua Franca of Human Rights and the Rise of a Global Bioethic’ (2001) 10 Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 253–263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krahn, Timothy and Wong, Sophia, ‘Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis and Reproductive Autonomy’ (2009) 19 Reproductive BioMedicine Online 34–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krajewska, Atina, ‘Access of Single Women to Fertility Treatment: A Case of Incidental Discrimination?’ (2015) 23(4) Medical Law Review 620–645.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
The Lancet Global Health, ‘Infertility: Why the Silence?’ (2022) 10(6) Lancet Global Health e773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lind, Craig, ‘Evans v United Kingdom: Judgments of Solomon – Power, Gender and Procreation’ (2006) 18(4) Child and Family Law Quarterly 576–592.Google Scholar
Löwy, Ilana, ‘ART with PGD: Risky Heredity and Stratified Reproduction’ (2020) 11 Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online 48–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacCallum, Fiona, ‘Parenting Genetically Unrelated Children: A Comparison of Embryo Donation and Adoption’, in Horsey, Kirsty and Biggs, Hazel (eds.), Human Fertilisation and Embryology: Reproducing Regulation (London: Routledge-Cavendish, 2007) 135–154.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, Robin, ‘Beyond Genetic and Gestational Dualities: Surrogacy Agreements, Legal Parenthood and Choice in Family Formation’, in Horsey, Kirsty and Biggs, Hazel (eds.), Human Fertilisation and Embryology: Reproducing Regulation (London: Routledge-Cavendish, 2007) 181–203.Google Scholar
Maclean, Alasdair, ‘Magic, Myths, and Fairy Tales: Consent and the Relationship between Law and Ethics’, in Freeman, Michael (ed.), Law and Bioethics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008) 111–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madden, Deirdre, Medicine, Ethics and the Law (Haywards Heath: Bloomsbury, 2016, 3rd ed.).Google Scholar
Margaria, Alice, The Construction of Fatherhood: The Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margaria, Alice, ‘Parenthood and Cross-Border Surrogacy: What Is “New”? The ECtHR’s First Advisory Opinion’ (2020) 28(2) Medical Law Review 412–425.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marshall, Lorna, ‘Ethical Issues in the Evolving Realm of Egg Donation’, in Francis, Leslie (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Reproductive Ethics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017) 478–498.Google Scholar
Mignot, Jean-François, ‘“Simple” Adoption in France: Revival of an Old Institution (1804–2007)’ (translation by Peter Hamilton) (2015) 56(3) Revue française de sociologie 365–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moffitt, Robert, ‘The Effect of Welfare on Marriage and Fertility’, in Moffitt, Robert (ed.), Welfare, the Family, and Reproductive Behaviour: Research Perspectives (Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 1998), 50–97.Google Scholar
Mouliarova, Ekaterina, ‘The Legal Recognition of Surrogacy in Russia’ (2019) 11(1) Italian Journal of Public Law 393–433.Google Scholar
Mulligan, Andrea, ‘Identity Rights and Sensitive Ethical Questions: The European Convention on Human Rights and the Regulation of Surrogacy Arrangements’ (2018) 26(3) Medical Law Review 449–475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mulligan, Andrea, ‘Reproductive Rights under Article 8: The Right to Respect for the Decision to Become or Not to Become a Parent’ (2014) 4 European Human Rights Law Review 378–387.Google Scholar
Murat, Pierre, ‘Filiation et vie familiale’, in Sudre, Frédéric (ed.), Le droit au respect de la vie familiale au sens de la Convention européenne des droits de l’homme (Brussels: Némésis-Bruylant, 2002) 161–208.Google Scholar
Nelson, Erin, Law, Policy and Reproductive Autonomy (Oxford: Hart, 2013).Google Scholar
Ngwena, Charles, ‘Inscribing Abortion as a Human Right: Significance of the Protocol on the Rights of Women in Africa’ (2010) 32(4) Human Rights Quarterly 783–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parfit, Derek, Reasons and Persons (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Parfit, Derek, ‘Rights, Interests, and Possible People’, in Gorowitz, Samuel et al. (eds.), Moral Problems in Medicine (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1976) 369–375, reprinted in Helga Kuhse, Udo Schüklenk and Peter Singers (eds.), Bioethics: An Anthology (Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons, 2016, 3rd ed.) 86–90.Google Scholar
Plomer, Aurora, ‘A Foetal Right to Life? The Case of Vo v France’ (2005) 5(2) Human Rights Law Review 311–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priaulx, Nicolette, ‘Beyond Health and Disability: Rethinking the “Foetal Abnormality” Ground in Abortion Law’, in Horsey, Kirsty and Biggs, Hazel (eds.), Human Fertilisation and Embryology: Reproducing Regulation (London: Routledge-Cavendish, 2007) 205–230.Google Scholar
Richards, Martin, ‘Which Children Can We Choose? Boundaries of Reproductive Autonomy’, in Day-Sclater, Shelley, Ebtehaj, Fatemeh, Jackson, Emily and Richards, Martin (eds.), Regulating Autonomy: Sex, Reproduction and Family (Oxford: Hart, 2009) 197–221.Google Scholar
Robertson, John, Children of Choice: Freedom and the New Reproductive Technologies (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, John, ‘Extending Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis: The Ethical Debate – Ethical Issues in New Uses of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis’ (2003) 18(3) Human Reproduction 465–471.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robertson, John, ‘The Presumptive Primacy of Procreative Liberty’, in Beauchamp, Tom, Walters, LeRoy, Kahn, Jeffrey and Mastroiani, Anna (eds.), Contemporary Issues in Bioethics (Boston: Wadsworth Cengage Learning, 2014, 8th ed.) 245–251.Google Scholar
Robertson, John, Kahn, Jeffrey, and Wagner, John, ‘Conception to Obtain Hematopoietic Stem Cells’ (2002) 32(3) Hastings Center Report 34–40, reprinted in Helga Kuhse, Udo Schüklenk and Peter Singer (eds.), Bioethics: An Anthology (Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2016, 3rd ed.) 144–151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenblum, Amanda, Horvat, Lucy, Siminoff, Laura, Prakash, Versha, Beitel, Janice and Garg, Amit, ‘The Authority of Next-of-Kin in Explicit and Presumed Consent Systems for Deceased Organ Donation: An Analysis of 54 Nations’ (2012) 27(6) Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2533–2546.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rubin, Lisa and Phillips, Aliza, ‘Infertility and Assisted Reproduction Technologies: Matters of Reproductive Justice’, in Chrisler, Joan (ed.), Reproductive Justice: A Global Concern (Santa Barbara: Praeger, 2012) 173–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabatello, Maya, ‘Posthumously Conceived Children: An International and Human Rights Perspective’ (2014) 27 Journal of Law and Health 29–67.Google Scholar
Sándor, Judit, ‘Bioethics and Basic Rights: Persons, Humans, and Boundaries of Life’, in Rosenfeld, Michel and Sajó, András (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012) 1142–1164.Google Scholar
Savulescu, Julian and Dahl, Edgar, ‘Sex Selection and Preimplanation Diagnosis: A Response to the Ethics Committee of the American Society of Reproductive Medicine’ (2000) 15(9) Human Reproduction 1879–1880, reprinted in Helga Kuhse, Udo Schüklenk and Peter Singer (eds.), Bioethics: An Anthology (Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2016, 3rd ed.) 141–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scherpe, Jens, ‘Medically Assisted Procreation: This Margin Needs to Be Appreciated’ (2012) 71(2) Cambridge Law Journal 276–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, Rosamund, ‘Choosing between Possible Lives: Legal and Ethical Issues in Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis’ (2006) 26(1) Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 153–178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott, Rosamund, ‘Reproductive Health: Morals, Margin and Rights’ (2018) 81(3) Modern Law Review 422–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seatzu, Francesco, ‘The Experience of the European Court of Human Rights with the European Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine’ (2015) 31(81) Utrecht Journal of International and European Law 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seavillelein, Victoria, ‘Challenging the Rhetoric of Choice in Prenatal Screening’ (2008) 23(1) Bioethics 68–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segers, Seppe, ‘The Path toward Ectogenesis: Looking beyond the Technical Challenges’ (2021) 22(1) BMC Medical Ethics 59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sermon, Karen, Van Steirteghem, André and Liebaers, Inge, ‘Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis’ (2004) 363(9421) Lancet 1633–1641.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sloan, Brian, ‘Unmarried Fathers and the Frustration of Family Life’ (2011) 70(2) Cambridge Law Journal 314–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solberg, Berge, ‘Getting beyond the Welfare of the Child in Assisted Reproduction’ (2009) 35(6) Journal of Medical Ethics 373–376.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Somsen, Han, ‘Regulating Human Genetics in a Neo-Eugenic Era’, in Murphy, Thérèse (ed.), New Technologies and Human Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009) 85–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sperling, Daniel, ‘Law and Bioethics: A Right-Based Relationship and Its Troubling Implications’, in Freeman, Michael (ed.), Law and Bioethics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008) 52–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spriggs, Merle, Autonomy and Patients’ Decisions (Boulder: Lexington Books, 2005).Google Scholar
Spriggs, Merle, ‘Is Conceiving a Child to Benefit Another against the Interests of the New Child?’ (2005) 31 Journal of Medical Ethics 341–342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spriggs, Merle, ‘IVF Mixup: White Couple Have Black Babies’ (2003) 29 Journal of Medical Ethics 65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spriggs, Merle, ‘Lesbian Couple Create a Child Who Is Deaf Like Them’ (2002) 28 Journal of Medical Ethics 283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stack, John Jr, ‘Judicial Policy-Making and the Evolving Protection of Human Rights: The European Court of Human Rights in Comparative Perspective’ (1992) 15(3) West European Politics 137–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staff Wilson, Mariblanca, Derechos sexuales y derechos reproductivos: parte esencial de los derechos humanos (Panamá: Instituto de la Mujer, Universidad de Panamá, 2010).Google Scholar
Stark, Barbara, ‘Transnational Surrogacy and International Human Rights Law’ (2011–12) 18 ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law 369–386.Google Scholar
Steiner, Eva, ‘Odièvre v France: Desperately Seeking Mother – Anonymous Births in the European Court of Human Rights’ (2003) 15(4) Child and Family Law Quarterly 425–448.Google Scholar
Thomasma, David, ‘Proposing a New Agenda: Bioethics and International Human Rights’ (2001) 10 Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 299–310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tobin, John, ‘To Prohibit or Permit: What Is the (Human) Rights Response to the Practice of International Commercial Surrogacy?’ (2014) 63(2) International & Comparative Law Quarterly 317–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Sloot, Bart, ‘Between Fact and Fiction: An Analysis of the Case-Law on Article 12 of the European Convention on Human Rights’ (2014) 26(4) Child and Family Law Quarterly 397–420.Google Scholar
Wade, Katherine, ‘The Regulation of Surrogacy: A Children’s Rights Perspective’ (2017) 29(2) Child and Family Law Quarterly 113–131.Google ScholarPubMed
Weisfeld, Glenn and Weisfeld, Carol, ‘Marriage: An Evolutionary Perspective’ (2003) 23(suppl. 4) Neuro Endocrinology Letters 47–54.Google Scholar
Wicks, Elizabeth, The State and the Body: Legal Regulation of Bodily Autonomy (Oxford: Hart, 2016).Google Scholar
Wilkinson, Stephen, Choosing Tomorrow’s Children: The Ethics of Selective Reproduction (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zampas, Christina and Gher, Jaime, ‘Abortion as a Human Right: International and Regional Standards’ (2008) 8(2) Human Rights Law Review 249–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Select Bibliography
  • Carmen Draghici, City University London
  • Book: Procreative Rights in International Law
  • Online publication: 26 April 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009443982.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Select Bibliography
  • Carmen Draghici, City University London
  • Book: Procreative Rights in International Law
  • Online publication: 26 April 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009443982.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Select Bibliography
  • Carmen Draghici, City University London
  • Book: Procreative Rights in International Law
  • Online publication: 26 April 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009443982.010
Available formats
×