Abrahamson, Zachary, ‘Essential Data’, 124 Yale Law Journal 867–81 (2014)Google Scholar

Acemoglu, Daron & Robinson, James A., ‘Persistence of Power, Elites, and Institutions’, 98 American Economic Review 267–93 (2008)Google Scholar

Acemoglu, Daron & Johnson, Simon, Power and Progress: Our Thousand-Year Struggle Over Technology and Prosperity (London: Basic Books, 2023)Google Scholar

Ackerman, Bruce, ‘The New Separation of Powers’, 113 Harvard Law Review 633–729 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aizu, Izumi, ‘Digital Platform Regulation in Japan – Does the Soft Approach Work?’, in Bayer, , Holznagel, , Korpisaari, & Woods, (eds.), Perspectives on Platform Regulation, 187–213Google Scholar

Akcigit, Ufuk, Chen, Wenjie, Diez, Federico J., Duval, Romain A., Engler, Philipp, Fan, Jiayue, Maggi, Chiara, Tavares, Marina Mendes, Schwarz, Daniel A., Shibata, Ippei & Villegas-Sánchez, Carolina, Rising Corporate Market Power: Emerging Policy Issues (Washington: IMF Staff Discussion Note, 2021)Google Scholar

Akman, Pınar, ‘Searching for the Long-Lost Soul of Article 82 EC’, 29 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 267–303 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Akman, Pınar, The Concept of Abuse in EU Competition Law: Law and Economic Approaches (Oxford/Portland: Hart, 2012, 2015 for the paperback edition)Google Scholar

Akman, Pınar, ‘The Role of “Freedom” in EU Competition Law’, 34 Legal Studies 183–213 (2014)Google Scholar

Akman, Pınar, ‘The Theory of Abuse in Google Search: A Positive and Normative Assessment under EU Competition Law’, 2 Journal of Law, Technology and Policy 301–74 (2017)Google Scholar

Akman, Pınar, ‘Regulating Competition in Digital Platform Markets: A Critical Assessment of the Framework and Approach of the EU Digital Markets Act’, 47 European Law Review 85–114 (2022)Google Scholar

Akman, Pınar, Or Brook & Konstantinos Stylianou (eds.), Research Handbook on Abuse of Dominance and Monopolization (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2023)Google Scholar

Alemanno, Alberto, ‘Levelling the EU Participatory Playing Field: A Legal and Policy Analysis of the Commission’s Public Consultations in Light of the Principle of Political Equality’, 26 European Law Journal 114–35 (2020)Google Scholar

Alexiadis, Peter & de Streel, Alexandre, ‘Designing an EU Intervention Standard for Digital Platforms’, EUI Working paper (Florence: European University Institute, 2020)Google Scholar

Allan, Trevor R. S., ‘The Rule of Law’, in Dyzenhaus, & Thorburn, (eds.), Constitutional Law, 201–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amar, Akhil Reed, America’s Constitution: A Biography (New York: Random House, 2005)Google Scholar

Amato, Giuliano, Antitrust and the Bounds of Power: The Dilemma of Liberal Democracy in the History of the Market (Oxford: Hart, 1997)Google Scholar

Ammann, Odile, ‘Transparency at the Expense of Equality and Integrity: Present and Future Directions of Lobby Regulation in the European Parliament’, 6/1 European Papers 239–68 (2021)Google Scholar

Ammann, Odile & Boussat, Audrey, ‘The Participation of Civil Society in European Union Environmental Law-Making Processes: A Critical Assessment of the European Commission’s Consultations in Connection with the European Climate Law’, 14 European Journal of Risk Regulation 235–52 (2023)Google Scholar

Andriychuk, Oles, The Normative Foundations of European Competition Law: Assessing the Goals of Antitrust through the Lens of Legal Philosophy (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andriychuk, Oles, ‘Shaping the New Modality of the Digital Markets: The Impact of the DSA/DMA Proposals on Inter-Platform Competition’, 44 World Competition 261–86 (2021)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anvari, Farid, Wenzel, Michael, Woodyatt, Lydia & Haslam, S. Alexander, ‘The Social Psychology of Whistleblowing: An Integrated Model’, 9 Organizational Psychology Review 41–67 (2019)Google Scholar

Areeda, Philip E., ‘Antitrust Laws and Public Utility Regulation’, 3 The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 42–57 (1972)Google Scholar

Areeda, Philip E., ‘Essential Facilities: An Epithet in Need of Limiting Principles’, 58 Antitrust Law Journal 841–53 (1990)Google Scholar

Areeda, Philip E. & Hovenkamp, Herbert, Antitrust Law: An Analysis of Antitrust Principles and Their Application, 5th edn (Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer, 2020)Google Scholar

von Arnim, Hans-Herbert, ‘Parteienstaat oder Parteiendemokratie?’ [Party State or Party Democracy?], 131 Deutsches Verwaltungsblatt [German Administrative Gazette] 1213–18 (2016)Google Scholar

Aron, Raymond, Democracy and Totalitarianism (Valence Ionescu trans., London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1968, first published in France in 1965 under the title Démocratie et totalitarisme, by Éditions Gallimard, Paris)Google Scholar

Aron, Raymond, Introduction à la philosophie politique : Démocratie et révolution [Introduction to Political Philosophy: Democracy and Revolution] (Paris: Le livre de poche, 1997, book based on a course given in 1952 at the French National School of Administration)Google Scholar

Aron, Raymond, La lutte de classes – Nouvelles leçons sur les sociétés industrielles [Class Struggle – New Lessons on Industrial Societies], in Aron, Raymond, (ed.), Penser la liberté, penser la démocratie [Thinking Freedom, Thinking Democracy], 991–1216 (Paris: Éditions Gallimard, 2005, first published in France in 1964 by Éditions Gallimard, Paris)Google Scholar

Ashwini, Siwal, ‘Social Media Platform Regulation in India – A Special Reference to the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021’, in Bayer, , Holznagel, , Korpisaari, & Woods, (eds.), Perspectives on Platform Regulation, 215–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Audier, Serge, ‘A Machiavellian Conception of Democracy? Democracy and Conflict’, in Colen, & Dutartre-Michaut, (eds.), Aron, 149–62Google Scholar

Australian Competition & Consumer Commission, Digital Platforms Inquiry: Final Report (Canberra: ACCC, 2019)Google Scholar

Autorité de la concurrence [French Competition Authority], Contribution au débat sur la politique de concurrence et les enjeux numériques [Contribution to the Debate on Competition Policy and Digital Issues] (Paris: Autorité de la concurrence, 19 February 2020)Google Scholar

Autorité de la concurrence [French Competition Authority] & Bundeskartellamt [German Federal Cartel Office], Competition Law and Data (Paris & Bonn: Autorité de la concurrence & Bundeskartellamt, 10 May 2016)Google Scholar

Bach, Ruben & Kreuter, Frauke, ‘Big Data in einer digitalisierten, datengestützten Demokratie’ [Big Data in a Digitalized, Data-Driven Democracy], in Spiecker gen. Döhmann, , Westland, & Campos, (eds.), Demokratie, 127–48Google Scholar

Baer, Bill, ‘Why Amazon Is Wrong about the American Innovation and Online Choice Act’, Brookings Institution (14 June 2022)Google Scholar

Bagnoli, Vicente, ‘Digital Platforms as Public Utilities’, 51 International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 903–5 (2020)Google Scholar

Yuntao Bai et al., ‘Constitutional AI: Harmlesness from AI Feedback’, Unpublished manuscript, https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.08073 (December 2022)Google Scholar

Bailey, Rishab & Misra, Prakhar, ‘Interoperability of Social Media: An Appraisal of the Regulatory and Technical Ecosystem’, 1–39, SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4095312 (February 2022)Google Scholar

Baker, Donald I. & Comanor, William S., ‘A U.S. Antitrust Agenda for the Dominant Information Platforms’, 35 Antitrust Magazine 66–71 (2021)Google Scholar

Baker, Jonathan B., Market Power in the U.S. Economy Today (Washington: Washington Center for Equitable Growth, March 2017)Google Scholar

Baker, Jonathan B., The Antitrust Paradigm: Restoring a Competitive Economy (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2019)Google Scholar

Baker, Jonathan B., ‘Finding Common Ground among Antitrust Reformers’, 84 Antitrust Law Journal 705–51 (2022)Google Scholar

Balasingham, Baskaran & Neilson, Tai, ‘Digital Platforms and Journalism in Australia: Analysing the Role of Competition Law’, 45 World Competition 295–318 (2022)Google Scholar

Balkin, Jack M., ‘How to Regulate (and Not Regulate) Social Media’, 1 Journal of Free Speech Law 71–96 (2021)Google Scholar

Ball, Matthew, The Metaverse: And How It Will Revolutionize Everything (New York: Liveright, 2022)Google Scholar

Bania, Konstantina, ‘Unravelling the Media Freedom Act Proposal: Ambitious Yet Underwhelming?’, The Platform Law Blog, 23 September 2022, https://theplatformlaw.blog/2022/09/23/unravelling-the-media-freedom-act-proposal-ambitious-yet-underwhelming/Google Scholar

Bania, Konstantina & Karanikioti, Theano, ‘Regulating Big Tech Raises Big Implementation Questions’, The Platform Law Blog, 19 July 2022, https://theplatformlaw.blog/2022/07/19/regulating-big-tech-raises-big-implementation-questions/Google Scholar

Barberis, Mauro, ‘La séparation des pouvoirs’ [The Separation of Powers] (Isabelle Boucobza trans.), in Troper, & Chagnollaud, (eds.), Droit constitutionnel, 705–32Google Scholar

Barrett, Lindsey, Moy, Laura, Ohm, Paul & Soltani, Ashkan, ‘Illusory Conflicts: Post-Employment Clearance Procedures and the FTC’s Technological Expertise’, 35 Berkeley Technology Law Journal 793–833 (2020)Google Scholar

Baume, Sandrine & Fontana, Biancamaria (eds.), Les usages de la séparation des pouvoirs – The Uses of the Separation of Powers (Paris: Houdiard, 2008)Google Scholar

Bayer, Judit, ‘Rights and Duties of Online Platforms’, in Bayer, , Holznagel, , Korpisaari, & Woods, (eds.), Perspectives on Platform Regulation, 25–45Google Scholar

Bayer, Judit, Holznagel, Bernd, Korpisaari, Päivi & Woods, Lorna (eds.), Perspectives on Platform Regulation: Concepts and Models of Social Media Governance across the Globe (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2021)Google Scholar

Bayer, Judit, Holznagel, Bernd, Korpisaari, Päivi & Woods, Lorna, ‘Conclusions: Regulatory Responses to Communication Platforms: Models and Limits’, in Bayer, , Holznagel, , Korpisaari, & Woods, (eds.), Perspectives on Platform Regulation, 565–84Google Scholar

Beaton-Wells, Caron, ‘Antitrust’s Neglected Question: Who Is “The Consumer”?’, 65 Antitrust Bulletin 173–93 (2020)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beaud, Olivier, ‘La multiplication des pouvoirs’ [The Multiplication of Powers], 143 Pouvoirs [Powers] 47–59 (2012)Google Scholar

Bechtold, Rainer, ‘Ministererlaubnis in Brüssel?’ [Ministerial Authorization in Brussels?], 7 Neue Zeitschrift für Kartellrecht [New Journal of Competition Law] 118–19 (2019)Google Scholar

Becker, Jörg, Holznagel, Bernd & Müller, Kilian, ‘Interoperability of Messenger Services. Possibilities for a Consumer-Friendly Approach’, in Bayer, , Holznagel, , Korpisaari, & Woods, (eds.), Perspectives on Platform Regulation, 119–43Google Scholar

Becker Castellaro, Sebastian & Penfrat, Jan, ‘The DSA Fails to Reign in the Most Harmful Digital Platform Businesses – But It Is Still Useful’, Verfassungsblog (8 November 2022)Google Scholar

Becker, Ulrich, Hatje, Armin, Schoo, Johann & Schwarze, Jürgen (eds.), EU-Kommentar [EU-Commentary], 4th edn (Baden-Baden, Vienna & Basel: Nomos, Facultas & Helbing, 2019)Google Scholar

Beetham, David, The Legitimation of Power, 2nd edn (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013)Google Scholar

Belgian Competition Authority, Authority for Consumers & Markets (Netherlands) and Conseil de la concurrence (Luxemburg), Joint Memorandum of the Belgian, Dutch and Luxembourg Competition Authorities on Challenges Faced by Competition Authorities in a Digital World (Brussels, The Hague and Luxemburg, 2 October 2019)Google Scholar

Bell, John, ‘Comparative Law and Fundamental Rights’, in Bell, John & Paris, Marie-Luce (eds.), Rights-Based Constitutional Review: Constitutional Courts in a Changing Landscape (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2016), 409–29Google Scholar

Bellamy, Richard & Child, Graham (David Bailey & Laura Elizabeth John, eds.), European Union Law of Competition, 8th edn (Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 2018)Google Scholar

Yoshua Bengio et al., ‘Pause Giant AI Experiments: An Open Letter’, Future of Life Institute (22 March 2023)Google Scholar

Benkler, Yochai, ‘Degrees of Freedom, Dimensions of Power’, 145 Dædalus 18–32 (2016)Google Scholar

Benyekhlef, Karim, ‘Droit global : un défi pour la démocratie’ [Global Law: A Challenge for Democracy], 353 Revue Projet [Project Review] 14–22 (2016/4)Google Scholar

Berg, Werner & Mäsch, Gerald (eds.), Deutsches und Europäisches Kartellrecht: Kommentar [German and European Competition Law: Commentary], 4th edn (Hürth: Wolters Kluwer, 2022)Google Scholar

Berk, Gerald, Louis D. Brandeis and the Making of Regulated Competition, 1900–1932 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009, 2011 for the paperback edition)Google Scholar

Bernatt, Maciej, Populism and Antitrust: The Illiberal Influence of Populist Government on the Competition Law System (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022)Google Scholar

Bernhardt, Lea & Voges, Paul, ‘Kartellrechtsdurchsetzung in Plattformmärkten: Strukturelle und funktionale Entflechtung von Plattformen’ [Antitrust Enforcement in Platform Markets: Structural and Functional Unbundling of Platforms], 72 Wirtschaft und Wettbewerb [Economy and Competition] 651–59 (2022)Google Scholar

Bernholz, Lucy, Landemore, Hélène & Reich, Rob (eds.), Digital Technology and Democratic Theory (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2021)Google Scholar

Bertrand, Valérie, ‘La conception du commerce dans l’Esprit des Lois de Montesquieu’ [The Conception of Commerce in Montesquieu’s Spirit of the Laws], 269–70 Annales historiques de la Révolution française [The Historical Annals of the French Revolution] 266–90 (1987)Google Scholar

Besson, Samantha, ‘Comment unifier le droit privé sans commodifier les droits de l’homme’ [How to Unify Private Law without Commodifying Human Rights], in Werro, Franz (ed.), Droit civil et Convention européenne des droits de l’homme [Civil Law and the European Convention on Human Rights] (Zurich: Schulthess, 2006), 14–26Google Scholar

Bibby, Andrew Scott, Montesquieu’s Political Economy (New York/Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016)Google Scholar

Bien, Florian, ‘Vers une autorisation “ministérielle” dans la procédure européenne de contrôle des fusions ? Un point de vue allemand’ [Towards a ‘Ministerial’ Authorization in the European Merger Control Procedure? A German Point of View], 2–2019 Concurrences 2–7Google Scholar

Bingham, Tom, The Rule of Law (London: Penguin, 2011)Google Scholar

Blackstone, William, Commentaries on the Laws of England in Four Books, 9th edn (London: W. Strahan, T. Cadell & D. Prince, 1783)Google Scholar

Blair, Roger D. & Daniel Sokol, D. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Antitrust Economics, 2 volumes (Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 2015)Google Scholar

Blair, Roger D. & Daniel Sokol, D. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Antitrust, Intellectual Property, and High Tech (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017)Google Scholar

Blanes i Vidal, Jordi, Draca, Mirko & Fons-Rosen, Christian, ‘Revolving Door Lobbyists’, 102 American Economic Review 3731–48 (2012)Google Scholar

Bogner, Alexander, Decker, Michael, Nentwich, Michael & Scherz, Constanze (eds.), Digitalisierung und die Zukunft der Demokratie [Digitalization and the Future of Democracy] (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2022)Google Scholar

Böhm, Franz, ‘Das Problem der privaten Macht: Ein Beitrag zur Monopolfrage’ [The Problem of Private Power: A Contribution to the Monopoly Question], in Goldschmidt, & Wohlgemuth, (eds.), Grundtexte, 49–67 (first published in 1928)Google Scholar

Böhm, Franz, ‘Democracy and Economic Power in Cartel and Monopoly in Modern Law’, in Crane, & Hovenkamp, (eds.), Competition Policy, 264–81 (first published in 1961)Google Scholar

Boix, Carles, Democratic Capitalism at the Crossroads: Technological Change and the Future of Politics (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2019)Google Scholar

Bollinger, Lee C. & Stone, Geoffrey R. (eds.), Social Media, Freedom of Speech, and the Future of Our Democracy (Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 2022)Google Scholar

Bonaparte, Napoléon, Maximes et pensées recueillies par Jean-Louis Gaudy jeune [Maxims and Thoughts Collected by Jean-Louis Gaudy, the Young] (Paris: A. Barbier – P. Baudouin, 1838)Google Scholar

Bönker, Frank & Wagener, Hans-Jürgen, ‘Hayek and Eucken on the State and Market Economy’, in Labrousse, & Weisz, (eds.), Institutional Economics, 183–99Google Scholar

Bork, Robert H., The Antitrust Paradox: A Policy at War with Itself, 2nd edn (New York: Free Press, 1993, first published in 1978)Google Scholar

Bostoen, Friso, ‘Understanding the Digital Markets Act’, 68 Antitrust Bulletin 263–306 (2023)Google Scholar

Bostrom, Nick, Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies (Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 2014, 2017 [reprint with corrections])Google Scholar

Botta, Marco & Wiedemann, Klause, ‘Exploitative Conducts in Digital Markets: Time for a Discussion after the Facebook Decision’, 10 Journal of European Competition Law & Practice 465–78 (2019)Google Scholar

Bourreau, Marc & de Streel, Alexandre, Digital Conglomerates and EU Competition Policy (Paris & Namur: Telecom ParisTech & University of Namur, 2019)Google Scholar

Bourreau, Marc, Krämer, Jan & Buiten, Miriam, Interoperability in Digital Markets (Brussels: Centre on Regulation in Europe, 2022)Google Scholar

Boyer, Robert, ‘Joining a Century-Long Process or Imagining a Revolution’, 19 Socio-Economic Review 1201–7 (2021)Google Scholar

Bradford, Anu, The Brussels Effect: How the European Union Rules the World (Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 2020)Google Scholar

Bradshaw, Samantha & Howard, Philip N., The Global Disinformation Order: 2019 Global Inventory of Organised Social Media Manipulation (Oxford: Oxford Internet Institute, 2019), https://comprop.oii.ox.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/93/2019/09/CyberTroop-Report19.pdfGoogle Scholar

Brandeis, Louis D., ‘The Regulation of Competition against the Regulation of Monopoly’, An Address to the Economic Club of New York on 1 November 1912, in Fraenkel, (ed.), Curse of Bigness, 109–11Google Scholar

Brandeis, Louis D., Other People’s Money and How the Bankers Use It (New York: Stokes, 1914)Google Scholar

Brankin, Sean-Paul & Treacy, Pat, ‘The DMA: Challenges for the Regulator as Well as the Regulated’, 2022/3 Concurrences | On-Topic 15–21Google Scholar

Buchmann, Johannes, ‘Demokratie und Öffentlichkeit im Digitalen Zeitalter’ [Democracy and the Public Sphere in the Digital Age], in Spiecker gen. Döhmann, , Westland, & Campos, (eds.), Demokratie, 15–39Google Scholar

Buchser, Lydia Patrizia, Kartellrechtliches Diskriminierungsverbot [Prohibition of Discrimination under Competition Law] (Zurich: Schulhess, 2022)Google Scholar

Buck, Ken, ‘Rep. Ken Buck on the Need for Antitrust Reform: “Big Corporate America Scares People”’, Interview with Asher Schechter, ProMarket (26 April 2022)Google Scholar

Budzinski, Oliver & Mendelsohn, Juliane, ‘Regulating Big Tech: From Competition Policy to Sector Regulation?’, 1–35, SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3938167 (October 2021), 71 ORDO (forthcoming 2023)Google Scholar

Budzinski, Oliver & Stöhr, Annika, ‘Competition Policy Reform in Europe and Germany: Institutional Change in the Light of Digitalization’, 15 European Competition Journal 15–54 (2019)Google Scholar

Bulst, Friedrich Wenzel, ‘Art. 102 AEUV’ [Art. 102 TFEU], in Bunte, (ed.), Kartellrecht 2, 613–745Google Scholar

Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Klimaschutz (BMWK; German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action), Wettbewerbspolitische Agenda des BMWK bis 2025: 10 Punkte für nachhaltigen Wettbewerb als Grundpfeiler der sozialökologischen Marktwirtschaft [Competition Policy Agenda of the BMWK until 2025: 10 Points for Sustainable Competition as a Cornerstone of the Social-ecological Market Economy] (Berlin: BMWK, 21 February 2022; English translation: www.d-kart.de/en/blog/2022/02/21/die-wettbewerbspolitische-agenda-der-bundesregierung/)Google Scholar

Bunte, Hermann-Josef (ed.), Kartellrecht: Kommentar [Competition Law: Commentary], Band 1: Deutsches Kartellrecht [Volume 1: German Competition Law], 14th edn (Hürth: Wolters Kluwer, 2022)Google Scholar

Bunte, Hermann-Josef (ed.), Kartellrecht: Kommentar [Competition Law: Commentary], Band 2: Europäisches Kartellrecht [Volume 2: European Competition Law], 14th edn (Hürth: Wolters Kluwer, 2022)Google Scholar

Buri, Ilaria & Hoboken, Joris van, ‘The DSA Proposal’s Impact on Digital Dominance’, in Richter, , Straub, & Tuchtfeld, (eds.), Big Tech, 10–5Google Scholar

Burnand, Léonard, Benjamin Constant (Paris: Perrin, 2022)Google Scholar

Busch, Christoph, ‘Self-Regulation and Regulatory Intermediation in the Platform Economy’, in Gamito, Marta Cantero & Micklitz, Hans-Wolfgang (eds.), The Role of the EU in Transnational Legal Ordering: Standards, Contracts and Codes (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2020), 115–34Google Scholar

Busch, Christoph, Graef, Inge, Hofmann, Jeanette & Gawer, Annabelle, Uncovering Blindspots in the Policy Debate on Platform Power: Final Report (Brussels: European Commission, 2021)Google Scholar

Cai, Cuihong & Wang, Tianchan, ‘Moving toward a “Middle Ground”? – The Governance of Platforms in the United States and China’, 14 Policy & Internet 243–62 (2022)Google Scholar

Callamard, Agnès, ‘The Human Rights Obligations of Non-State Actors’, in Jørgensen, (ed.), Human Rights, 191–225Google Scholar

Callander, Steven, Foarta, Dana & Sugaya, Takuo, ‘Market Competition and Political Influence: An Integrated Approach’, 90 Econometrica 2723–53 (2022)Google Scholar

Calliess, Christian & Ruffert, Matthias, EUV & AEUV mit Europäischer Grudrechtecharta: Kommentar [TEU & TFEU with European Charter of Fundamental Rights: Commentary], 6th edn (Munich: Beck, 2022)Google Scholar

Candeub, Adam, ‘Bargaining for Free Speech: Common Carriage, Network Neutrality, and Section 230’, 22 Yale Journal of Law & Technology 391–433 (2020)Google Scholar

Caplan, Robyn, ‘The Artisan and the Decision Factory: The Organizational Dynamics of Private Speech Governance’, in Bernholz, , Landemore, & Reich, (eds.), Digital Technology and Democratic Theory, 167–90Google Scholar

Caporaso, James A. & Levine, David P., Theories of Political Economy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992)Google Scholar

Carolan, Eoin, The New Separation of Powers: A Theory for the Modern State (Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 2009)Google Scholar

Carrithers, David W., Mosher, Michael A. & Rahe, Paul A. (eds.), Montesquieu’s Science of Politics: Essays on The Spirit of Laws (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2001)Google Scholar

Casadesus-Masanell, Ramon & Hervas-Drane, Andres, ‘Competing with Privacy’, 61 Management Science 229–46 (2015)Google Scholar

Castelfranchi, Cristiano, ‘The Micro-Macro Constitution of Power’, 18/19 ProtoSociology 208–65 (2003)Google Scholar

Carmelo Cennamo et al., ‘Digital Platforms Regulation: An Innovation-Centric View of the EU’s Digital Markets Act’, 14 Journal of European Competition Law & Practice 44–51 (2023)Google Scholar

Ceva, Emanuela & Ferretti, Maria Paola, Political Corruption: The Internal Enemy of Public Institutions (Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 2021)Google Scholar

Chalmers, David J., ‘What Can Virtual Reality Tell Us about Real Reality and the Nature of Existence? David Chalmers Reveals All to Richard Webb’, Interview with Richard Webb, New Scientist 48–51 (29 January 2022)Google Scholar

Chalmers, David J., Reality+: Virtual Worlds and the Problems of Philosophy (New York: W. W. Norton, 2022)Google Scholar

Chari, Raj, Hogan, John, Murphy, Gary & Crepaz, Michele, Regulating Lobbying: A Global Comparison, 2nd edn (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2019)Google Scholar

Châton, Gwendal, Introduction à Raymond Aron [Introduction to Raymond Aron] (Paris: La Découverte, 2017)Google Scholar

Chavalarias, David, Toxic Data : Comment les reseaux manipulent nos opinions [Toxic Data: How Networks Manipulate Our Opinions] (Paris: Flammarion, 2022)Google Scholar

Cioffi, John W., Kenney, Martin F. & Zysman, John, ‘Platform Power and Regulatory Politics: Polanyi for the Twenty-First Century’, 27 New Political Economy 820–36 (2022)Google Scholar

Coeckelbergh, Mark, AI Ethics (Cambridge: MIT Press, 2020)Google Scholar

Coen, David & Vannoni, Matia, ‘Sliding Doors in Brussels: A Career Path Analysis of EU Affairs Managers’, 55 European Journal of Political Research 811–26 (2016)Google Scholar

Coglianese, Cary, ‘Legitimacy and Corporate Governance’, 32 Delaware Journal of Corporate Law 159–67 (2007)Google Scholar

Cohen, Daniel, Homo numericus: La ‘civilization’ qui vient [Homo Numericus: The Civilization That Is Coming] (Paris: Albin Michel, 2022)Google Scholar

Cohen, Joshua & Fung, Archon, ‘Democracy and the Digital Public Sphere’, in Bernholz, , Landemore, & Reich, (eds.), Digital Technology and Democratic Theory, 23–61Google Scholar

Colangelo, Giuseppe & Borgogno, Oscar, ‘Is It Better to Address the Apple-Google App Store Duopoly through Antitrust or Regulation?’, ProMarket (7 April 2022)Google Scholar

Coleman, Stephen, ‘Digital Democracy’, in Mazzoleni, (ed.-in-chief), Political Communication, volume I, 306–17Google Scholar

Colen, José & Dutartre-Michaut, Elisabeth (eds.), The Companion to Raymond Aron (New York/Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015)Google Scholar

Comanor, William S. & Baker, Donald I., ‘The Issue of Consumer Welfare in the Government Complaints against Google & Facebook’, 67 Antitrust Bulletin 12–22 (2022)Google Scholar

Combe, Emmanuel, La concurrence [Competition], 2nd edn (Paris: P.U.F., 2022)Google Scholar

Constant, Benjamin, Principles of Politics Applicable to All Representative Governments, in Political Writings 169–305 (Biancamaria Fontana trans. & ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988, first published in French in 1815)Google Scholar

Cooper, James C., ‘Antitrust and Privacy’, in Global Antitrust Institute, Digital Economy, 1188–222Google Scholar

Corporate Europe Observatory & LobbyControl, The Lobby Network: Big Tech’s Web of Influence in the EU (Brussels and Cologne: Corporate Europe Observatory & LobbyControl e.V., August 2021)Google Scholar

Cowgill, Bo, Prat, Andrea & Valletti, Tommaso, ‘Political Power and Market Power’, CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP17178, SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4390776 (May 2023)Google Scholar

Coyle, Diane, ‘Platform Dominance: The Shortcomings of Antitrust Policy’, in Moore, & Tambini, (eds.), Digital Dominance, 50–70Google Scholar

Crane, Daniel A., ‘Antitrust’s Unconventional Politics’, 104 Virginia Law Review Online 118–55 (2018)Google Scholar

Crane, Daniel A., ‘Fascism and Monopoly’, 118 Michigan Law Review 1315–70 (2020)Google Scholar

Crane, Daniel A., ‘Antitrust and Democracy’, Investigaciones CeCo 1–9 (2021)Google Scholar

Crane, Daniel A., ‘Antitrust as an Instrument of Democracy’, 72 Duke Law Journal Online 21–40 (2022)Google Scholar

Crane, Daniel A. & Hovenkamp, Herbert (eds.), The Making of Competition Policy: Legal and Economic Sources (Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 2013)Google Scholar

Crawford, Kate, Atlas of AI: Powers, Politics, and the Planetary Costs of Artificial Intelligence (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2021)Google Scholar

Crémer, Jacques, Montjoye, Yves-Alexandre de & Schweitzer, Heike, Competition Policy for the Digital Era (Brussels: European Commission, 2019)Google Scholar

Cunningham, Colleen, Ederer, Florian & Ma, Song, ‘Killer Acquisitions’, 129 Journal of Political Economy 649–702 (2021)Google Scholar

Cusumano, Michael A., Gawer, Annabelle & Yoffie, David B., The Business of Platforms: Strategy in the Age of Digital Competition, Innovation, and Power (New York: HarperCollins, 2019)Google Scholar

Cusumano, Michael A., Gawer, Annabelle & Yoffie, David B., ‘Can Self-Regulation Save Digital Platforms?’, 30 Industrial and Corporate Change 1259–85 (2021)Google Scholar

Dahl, Robert A., ‘The Concept of Power’, 2 Behavioral Science 201–15 (1957)Google Scholar

Dalheimer, Dorothe, Feddersen, Christoph T. & Miersch, Gerald, EU-Kartellverfahrensverordnung: Kommentar zur VO 1/2003 [EU Cartel Procedure Regulation: Commentary on Regulation 1/2003] (Munich: Beck, 2005)Google Scholar

Day, Gregory, ‘Monopolizing Free Speech’, 88 Fordham Law Review 1315–64 (2020)Google Scholar

Dayen, David, Monopolized: Life in the Age of Corporate Power (New York: The New Press, 2020)Google Scholar

Deakin, Simon, ‘The Corporation as Commons: Rethinking Property Rights, Governance and Sustainability in the Business Enterprise’, 37 Queen’s Law Journal 339–81 (2011)Google Scholar

Declaration for the Future of the Internet, available at www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Declaration-for-the-Future-for-the-Internet_Launch-Event-Signing-Version_FINAL.pdf (2022)Google Scholar

Deffains, Bruno, d’Ormesson, Olivier & Perroud, Thomas, Politique de concurrence et politique industrielle : pour une réforme du droit européen [Competition Policy and Industrial Policy: For a Reform of European Law] (Paris: Fondation Robert Schuman, January 2020)Google Scholar

Gregorio, Giovanni De & Pollicino, Oreste, ‘The European Constitutional Road to Address Platform Power’, in Richter, , Straub, & Tuchtfeld, (eds.), Big Tech, 16–21Google Scholar

Deutscher, Elias, ‘How to Measure Privacy-Related Consumer Harm in Merger Analysis? A Critical Reassessment of the European Commission’s Merger Control in Data-Driven Markets’, in Lundqvist, & Gal, (eds.), Competition Law, 173–211Google Scholar

Deutscher, Elias, ‘Reshaping Digital Competition: The New Platform Regulations and the Future of Modern Antitrust’, 67 Antitrust Bulletin 302–40 (2022)Google Scholar

Deutscher, Elias & Makris, Stavros, ‘Exploring the Ordoliberal Paradigm: The Competition-Democracy Nexus’, 11 Competition Law Review 181–214 (2016)Google Scholar

Devlin, Alan J., Reforming Antitrust (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021)Google Scholar

Dicey, Albert V., Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, 8th edn (London: Macmillan, 1915)Google Scholar

Digital Competition Expert Panel, Unlocking Digital Competition (London: HM Treasury, March 2019)Google Scholar

Di Porto, Fabiana & Podszun, Rupprecht (eds.), Abusive Practices in Competition Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2018)Google Scholar

Dixon, Chris, ‘Why Decentralization Matters’, OneZero, 18 February 2018Google Scholar

Djelic, Marie-Laure, Exporting the American Model: The Postwar Transformation of European Business (Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 2001)Google Scholar

Doellgast, Virginia, ‘Labor Power and Solidarity in Economic Bicameralism’, 19 Socio-Economic Review 1207–11 (2021)Google Scholar

Dolata, Ulrich, ‘Platform Regulation: Coordination of Markets and Curation of Sociality on the Internet’, in Kurz, , Schütz, , Strohmaier, & Zilian, (eds.), Smart Technologies, 457–77Google Scholar

Douglas, Erika M., ‘The New Antitrust/Data Privacy Law Interface’, Yale Law Journal Forum, 18 January 2021, 647–84Google Scholar

Dowdle, Michael W., Gillespie, John & Maher, Imelda (eds.), Asian Capitalism and the Regulation of Competition: Towards a Regulatory Geography of Global Competition Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013)Google Scholar

Drexl, Josef, ‘Economic Efficiency versus Democracy: On the Potential Role of Competition Policy in Regulating Digital Markets in Times of Post-Truth Politics’, in Gerard, & Lianos, (eds.), Efficiency and Equity, 242–67Google Scholar

Dubber, Markus D., Pasquale, Frank & Das, Sunit (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Ethics of AI (Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 2020)Google Scholar

Duberry, Jérôme, Artificial Intelligence and Democracy: Risks and Promises of AI-Mediated Citizen-Government Relations (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2022)Google Scholar

Dunne, Niamh, ‘Pro-competition Regulation in the Digital Economy: The United Kingdom’s Digital Markets Unit’, 67 Antitrust Bulletin 341–66 (2022)Google Scholar

Durand, Cédric, Techno-féodalisme – Critique de l’économie numérique [Techno-feudalism: Critique of the Digital Economy] (Paris: Zones, 2020)Google Scholar

Durand, Cédric, ‘Musk s’inscrit dans une logique techno-féodale’ [Musk Is Part of a Techno-feudal Logic], Interview with Pascal Riché, L’Obs, 12 January 2023, 28–31Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, David & Thorburn, Malcolm (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of Constitutional Law (Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 2016)Google Scholar

Earn, Jonathan, The Metaverse: What You Need to Know about the Metaverse, Virtual Reality, Augmented Reality and Extended Reality (independently published, 2022)Google Scholar

Eben, Magali & Robertson, Viktoria H.S.E., ‘Digital Market Definition in the European Union, United States, and Brazil: Past, Present, and Future’, 18 Journal of Competition Law & Economics 417–55 (2022)Google Scholar

Economic Security Project, From Moment to Movement: The Antimonopoly Fund (Washington: Economic Security Project, 2022)Google Scholar

Eggers, Dave, The Every (London: Hamish Hamilton, 2021)Google Scholar

Ehlers, Dirk (ed.), Europäische Grundrechte und Grundfreiheiten [European Fundamental Rights and Fundamental Freedoms], 4th edn (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2014)Google Scholar

Eifert, Martin, Metzger, Axel, Schweitzer, Heike & Wagner, Gerhard, ‘Taming the Giants: The DMA/DSA Package’, 58 Common Market Law Review 987–1028 (2021)Google Scholar

Eigenmann, Matthias, ‘Enhanced Privacy for Data Analytics’, 5 Life Science Recht [Life Science Law] 27–35 (2022)Google Scholar

Eilmansberger, Thomas & Bien, Florian, ‘Art. 102 AEUV’ [Art. 102 TFEU], in Säcker, , Bien, , Meier-Beck, & Montag, (eds.), Wettbewerbsrecht 1, 1533–815Google Scholar

Elhauge, Einer, ‘Horizontal Shareholding’, 129 Harvard Law Review 1267–317 (2016)Google Scholar

Elhauge, Einer, ‘How Horizontal Shareholding Harms Our Economy – And Why Antitrust Law Can Fix It’, 10 Harvard Business Law Review 207–86 (2020)Google Scholar

Elhauge, Einer, ‘The Causal Mechanisms Horizontal Shareholding’, 82 Ohio State Law Journal 1–75 (2021)Google Scholar

Enriques, Luca, Hansmann, Henry, Kraakman, Reinier & Pargendler, Mariana, ‘The Basic Governance Structure: Minority Shareholders and Non-Shareholder Constituencies’, in Kraakman, et al., Corporate Law, 79–108Google Scholar

Epstein, Robert, ‘Manipulating Minds: The Power of Search Engines to Influence Votes and Opinions’, in Moore, & Tambini, (eds.), Digital Dominance, 294–319Google Scholar

Esayas, Samson Y., ‘Data Privacy in European Merger Control: Critical Analysis of Commission Decisions Regarding Privacy as a Non-price Competition’, 40 European Competition Law Review 166–81 (2019)Google Scholar

Eskridge Jr., William N. & Ferejohn, John, A Republic of Statutes: The New American Constitution (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2010)Google Scholar

Eucken, Walter, Grundsätze der Wirtschaftspolitik [Principles of Economic Policy], 7th edn (Stuttgart: UTB, 2004, first published in 1952)Google Scholar

European Commission, Guidance on the Commission’s Enforcement Priorities in Applying Article 82 of the EC Treaty [now Article 102 TFEU] to Abusive Exclusionary Conduct by Dominant Undertakings (OJ C 45, 24 February 2009, 7–20)Google Scholar

European Commission, Evaluation of the Commission Notice on the Definition of Relevant Market for the Purposes of Community Competition Law of 9 December 1997, Commission Staff Working Document (Brussels: European Commission, 12 July 2021)Google Scholar

Ezrachi, Ariel & Stucke, Maurice E., Virtual Competition: The Promise and Perils of the Algorithm-Driven Economy (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2016)Google Scholar

Ezrachi, Ariel & Stucke, Maurice E., ‘The Fight over Antitrust’s Soul’, 9 Journal of European Competition Law & Practice 1–2 (2018)Google Scholar

Ezrachi, Ariel & Stucke, Maurice E., ‘Antitrust Enforcement and Market Power in the Digital Age: Is Your Digital Assistant Devious?’, in Gerard, & Lianos, (eds.), Efficiency and Equity, 222–41Google Scholar

Ezrachi, Ariel & Stucke, Maurice E., How Big-Tech Barons Smash Innovation–and How to Strike Back (New York: Harper Business, 2022)Google Scholar

Falcon, Ernesto & Ragheb, Suzi, ‘What about International Digital Competition?’, Electronic Frontier Foundation Blog, 26 October 2021, www.eff.org/fr/deeplinks/2021/10/what-about-international-digital-competitionGoogle Scholar

Farrell, Henry & Schwartzberg, Melissa, ‘The Democratic Consequences of the New Public Sphere’, in Bernholz, , Landemore, & Reich, (eds.), Digital Technology and Democratic Theory, 191–218Google Scholar

Federal Trade Commission (FTC), ‘Refusal to Deal’, in Guide to Antitrust Laws, www.ftc.gov/tips-advice/competition-guidance/guide-antitrust-laws/single-firm-conduct/refusal-dealGoogle Scholar

Ferguson, Niall, The Square and the Tower: Networks, Hierarchies and the Struggle for Global Power (London: Allen Lane, 2017)Google Scholar

Ferreras, Isabelle, Firms as Political Entities: Saving Democracy through Economic Bicameralism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017)Google Scholar

Feser, Edward (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Hayek (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006)Google Scholar

First, Harry & Weber Waller, Spencer, ‘Antitrust’s Democracy Deficit’, 81 Fordham Law Review 2543–74 (2013)Google Scholar

Fishkin, Joseph & Forbath, William E., The Anti-Oligarchy Constitution: Reconstructing the Economic Foundations of American Democracy (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2022)Google Scholar

Foarta, Dana, Callander, Steven & Sugaya, Takuo, ‘The Understated Relationship between Market Dominance and Political Influence’, ProMarket (21 July 2022)Google Scholar

Foer, Franklin, World without Mind: The Existential Threat of Big Tech (New York: Penguin, 2017)Google Scholar

Foroohar, Rana, Don’t Be Evil: The Case Against Big Tech (London: Allen Lane, 2019)Google Scholar

Fox, Brooke, Scott Morton, Fiona & Kimmelman, Gene, ‘Fighting New Antitrust Rules Is a Bad Move for Big Tech’, ProMarket (26 October 2022)Google Scholar

Fox, Eleanor M., ‘The Battle for the Soul of Antitrust’, 75 California Law Review 917–23 (1987)Google Scholar

Fox, Eleanor M., ‘Against Goals’, 81 Fordham Law Review 2157–61 (2013)Google Scholar

Fox, Eleanor M., ‘Antitrust and Democracy: How Markets Protect Democracy, Democracy Protects Markets, and Illiberal Politics Threatens to Hijack Both’, 46 Legal Issues of Economic Integration 317–28 (2019)Google Scholar

Fox, Eleanor M., ‘“Consumer Welfare” and the Real Battle for the Soul of Antitrust’, ProMarket (19 April 2023)Google Scholar

Fraenkel, Osmond K. (ed.), The Curse of Bigness: Miscellaneous Papers of Louis D. Brandeis (New York: Viking Press, 1935)Google Scholar

Franck, Jens-Uwe & Peitz, Martin, ‘How to Challenge Big Tech’, in Richter, , Straub, & Tuchtfeld, (eds.), Big Tech, 84–9Google Scholar

Franck, Jens-Uwe & Peitz, Martin, ‘Digital Platforms and the New 19a Tool in the German Competition Act’, 12 Journal of European Competition Law & Practice 513–28 (2021)Google Scholar

Frankel Paul, Ellen, ‘Hayek on Monopoly and Antitrust in the Crucible of United States v. Microsoft’, 1 New York University Journal of Law & Liberty 167–204 (2005)Google Scholar

Frenkel, Sheera & Kang, Cecilia, An Ugly Truth: Inside Facebook’s Battle for Domination (New York: HarperCollins, 2021)Google Scholar

Friedman, Milton, ‘Capitalism and Freedom’, 1 New Individualist Review 3–10 (1961)Google Scholar

Friedman, Milton, Capitalism and Freedom (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1962, 40th Anniversary Edition, 2002)Google Scholar

, Milton & Friedman, Rose, Free to Choose: A Personal Statement (New York: Harcourt, 1980, 1990)Google Scholar

Friedrich, Carl J. & Brzezinski, Zbigniew K., Totalitarian Dictatorship and Autocracy, 2nd edn revised by Carl J. Friedrich (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1965, first edition published in 1956)Google Scholar

Fries, Lukas, Die Berücksichtigung außerwettbewerblicher Interessen in der Fusionskontrolle [The Consideration of Non-Competitive Interests in Merger Control] (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2020)Google Scholar

Frischhut, Markus, Strengthening Transparency and Integrity via the New ‘Independent Ethics Body’ (IEB) (Brussels: Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs, European Parliament, 2020)Google Scholar

Frydman, Benoît, ‘Droit global et régulation : Quels points de contrôle pour une régulation de l’économie de marché?’ [Regulating Global Law: Finding the Levers to Regulate Market Economy], 14 Revue d’études benthamiennes [Journal of Benthamian Studies] 14–20 (2018)Google Scholar

Fuchs, Andreas, ‘Art. 102 AEUV’ [Art. 102 TFEU], in Immenga & Mestmäcker (Körber, , Schweitzer, & Zimmer, , eds.), Wettbewerbsrecht 1, 550–774Google Scholar

Fukuyama, Francis, ‘“A Loaded Weapon”: Francis Fukuyama on the Political Power of Digital Platforms’, Interview with Asher Schechter & Filippo Lancieri, ProMarket (4 December 2020)Google Scholar

Fukuyama, Francis, ‘Making the Internet Safe for Democracy’, 32 Journal of Democracy 37–44 (2021)Google Scholar

Fukuyama, Francis, Liberalism and Its Discontents (London: Profile Books, 2022)Google Scholar

Fukuyama, Francis, Richman, Barak & Goel, Ashish, ‘How to Save Democracy from Technology’, 100 Foreign Affairs 98–104 & 106–10 (2021)Google Scholar

Fukuyama, Francis, Richman, Barak, Goel, Ashish, Katz, Roberta R., Melamed, A. Douglas & Schaake, Marietje, Report of the Working Group on Platform Scale (Stanford: Stanford University, 2020)Google Scholar

Furman, Jason, Prepared Testimony for the Hearing ‘Online Platforms and Market Power, Part 3: The Role of Data and Privacy in Competition’ (Washington: U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on the Judiciary, Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial and Administrative Law, 18 October 2019)Google Scholar

Future of Life Institute, Policymaking in the Pause: What Can Policymakers Do Now to Combat Risks from Advanced AI Systems? (Cambridge: Future of Life Institute, 2023)Google Scholar

Galbraith, John Kenneth, The Anatomy of Power (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1983)Google Scholar

Gamble, Andrew, ‘Hayek on Knowledge, Economics, and Society’, in Feser, (ed.), Hayek, 111–31Google Scholar

Gasser, Urs & Schmitt, Carolyn, ‘The Role of Professional Norms in the Governance of Artificial Intelligence’, in Dubber, , Pasquale, & Das, (eds.), Ethics of AI, 141–59Google Scholar

Gaulard, Géraldine, La pleine juridiction du juge de l’Union européenne en droit de la concurrence : Contrôle et compétence sur les amendes [The Full Jurisdiction of the European Union Judge in Competition Law: Control and Jurisdiction over Fines] (Brussels: Bruylant, 2020)Google Scholar

Geradin, Damien, ‘Korean Bill Banning Apple and Google from Mandating their In-app Payment Solutions Moves Forward’, The Platform Law Blog, 1 September 2021, https://theplatformlaw.blog/2021/09/01/korean-bill-banning-apple-and-google-from-mandating-their-in-app-payment-solutions-moves-forward/Google Scholar

Geradin, Damien, ‘The DMA Should Stay True to Its Principles, or It Could Fail’, The Platform Law Blog, 8 November 2021, https://theplatformlaw.blog/2021/11/08/the-dma-should-stay-true-to-its-principles-or-it-could-fail/Google Scholar

Geradin, Damien, ‘Spotify and Google Announce User Choice Billing: A Preliminary Assessment’, The Platform Law Blog, 24 March 2022, https://theplatformlaw.blog/2022/03/24/spotify-and-google-announce-user-choice-billing-a-preliminary-assessment/Google Scholar

Geradin, Damien, ‘The Leaked “Final” Version of the Digital Markets Act: A Summary in Ten Points’, The Platform Law Blog, 19 April 2022, https://theplatformlaw.blog/2022/04/19/the-leaked-final-version-of-the-digital-markets-act-a-summary-in-ten-points/Google Scholar

Geradin, Damien, ‘The DMA Has Been Published: Now the Real Challenges Start’, The Platform Law Blog, 12 October 2022, https://theplatformlaw.blog/2022/10/12/the-dma-has-been-published-now-the-real-challenges-start/Google Scholar

Geradin, Damien & Katsifis, Dimitrios, ‘The Antitrust Case against the Apple App Store’, 17 Journal of Competition Law & Economics 503–85 (2021)Google Scholar

Geradin, Damien, Katsifis, Dimitrios & Karanikioti, Theano, ‘Google as de facto Privacy Regulator: Analysing the Privacy Sandbox from an Antitrust Perspective’, 17 European Competition Journal 617–81 (2021)Google Scholar

Gerard, Damien & Lianos, Ioannis (eds.), Reconciling Efficiency and Equity: A Global Challenge for Competition Policy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019)Google Scholar

Gerber, David J., Law and Competition in Twentieth Century Europe: Protecting Prometheus (Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 1998)Google Scholar

Gerber, David J., Global Competition: Law, Markets, and Globalization (Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 2010)Google Scholar

Gerber, David J., ‘Prisms of Distance and Power: Viewing the U.S. Regulatory Tradition’, 93 Business History Review 781–99 (2019)Google Scholar

Gerber, David J., Competition Law and Antitrust: A Global Guide (Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 2020)Google Scholar

Gerbrandy, Anna, ‘Rethinking Competition Law within the European Economic Constitution’, 57 Journal of Common Market Studies 127–42 (2019)Google Scholar

Ghosh, Dipayan, ‘Don’t Break Up Facebook – Treat It Like a Utility’, Harvard Business Review, 30 May 2019, https://hbr.org/2019/05/dont-break-up-facebook-treat-it-like-a-utilityGoogle Scholar

Gilbert, Richard J., ‘The American Innovation and Choice Online Act: Lessons from the 1950 Celler-Kevaufer Amendment’, Concurrentialiste, 27 January 2022Google Scholar

Global Antitrust Institute, Report on the Digital Economy (Arlington: Global Antitrust Institute, 2020)Google Scholar

Gökçe Dessemond, Ebru, ‘Restoring Competition in “Winner-Took-All” Digital Platform Markets’, UNCTAD Research Paper No. 40 (December 2019)Google Scholar

Goldschmidt, Nils & Wohlgemuth, Michael (eds.), Grundtexte zur Freiburger Tradition der Ordnungsökomik [Basic Texts on the Freiburg Tradition of Constitutional Economics] (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2008)Google Scholar

Grace Jr., H. Stephen, Prendergast, S. Lawrence & Koski-Grafer, Susan, ‘Board Oversight and Governance: From Tone at the Top to Substantive Checks and Balances’, American Bar Association, Business Law Today (14 February 2019)Google Scholar

Graef, Inge, ‘Market Definition and Market Power in Data: The Case of Online Platforms’, 38 World Competition 473–505 (2015)Google Scholar

Graef, Inge, ‘When Data Evolves into Market Power – Data Concentration and Data Abuse under Competition Law’, in Moore, & Tambini, (eds.), Digital Dominance, 71–97Google Scholar

Graef, Inge, ‘Rethinking the Essential Facilities Doctrine for the EU Digital Economy’, 53 Revue juridique Thémis de l’Université de Montréal [Thémis Law Review of the University of Montreal] 33–72 (2019)Google Scholar

Graef, Inge, ‘Differentiated Treatment in Platform-to-Business Relations: EU Competition Law and Economic Dependence’, 38 Yearbook of European Law 448–99 (2019)Google Scholar

Graef, Inge & Costa-Cabral, Francisco, ‘To Regulate or not to Regulate Big Tech’, 2020 Concurrences 24–9Google Scholar

Graham, Edward M. & David Richardson, J. (eds.), Global Competition Policy (New York: Columbia University Press, 1997)Google Scholar

Greenfield, Kent, ‘Reclaiming Corporate Law in a New Gilded Age’, 2 Harvard Law & Policy Review 1–32 (2008)Google Scholar

Grimm, Dieter, Peters, Anne & Wielsch, Dan, Grundrechtsfunktionen jenseits des Staates [Fundamental Rights Functions Beyond the State] (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2021)Google Scholar

Guggenberger, Nikolas, ‘Essential Platforms’, 24 Stanford Technology Law Review 237–343 (2021)Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen, Ein neuer Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit und die deliberative Politik [A New Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere and Deliberative Politics] (Berlin: Suhrkamp, 2022)Google Scholar

Haley, John O., Antitrust in Germany and Japan: The First Fifty Years, 1947–1998 (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2001)Google Scholar

d’Halluin, Martin, ‘The DMA: An Ambitious Act with Countless Challenges’, 2022/3 Concurrences | On-Topic 10–4Google Scholar

Hamilton, Alexander, Madison, James & Jay, John, The Federalist Papers (Goldman, Lawrence ed., Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 2008, first published as a series of eighty-five essays in the winter of 1787–88)Google Scholar

Harari, Yuval Noah, 21 Lessons for the 21st Century (London: Jonathan Cape, 2018)Google Scholar

Hartmann, Sarah, ‘Policy Developments in the USA to Address Platform Information Disorders’, in Bayer, , Holznagel, , Korpisaari, & Woods, (eds.), Perspectives on Platform Regulation, 99–117Google Scholar

Hasen, Richard L., ‘Lobbying, Rent-Seeking, and the Constitution’, 64 Stanford Law Review 191–253 (2012)Google Scholar

Hasen, Richard L., ‘Fixing Washington’, 126 Harvard Law Review 550–85 (2012)Google Scholar

Hauriou, Maurice, Principes de droit public [Principles of Public Law], 2nd edn (Paris: Sirey, 1916)Google Scholar

Hawk, Barry E., Monopoly in America (Huntington: Juris, 2022)Google Scholar

Hawking, Stephen, Brief Answers to the Big Questions (London: Murray, 2018)Google Scholar

Hawley, Josh, The Tyranny of Big Tech (Washington: Regnery, 2021)Google Scholar

von Hayek, Friedrich A., The Road to Serfdom (London: Routledge, 2005 [reprint], first published in 1944)Google Scholar

von Hayek, Friedrich A., The Constitution of Liberty (Hamowy, Ronald ed., Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2011, first published in 1960)Google Scholar

von Hayek, Friedrich A., Law, Legislation and Liberty (London: Routledge, 1982, reprinted in 1998)Google Scholar

von Hayek, Friedrich A., Political Order of a Free People, volume 3 of Law, Legislation and Liberty (London: Routledge, 1982, reprinted in 1998, volume 3 first published in 1979 by The University of Chicago Press)Google Scholar

Hearn, Jonathan, Theorizing Power (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012)Google Scholar

Heinemann, Andreas, ‘Demokratie und Marktwirtschaft: Direkte und indirekte Formen dezentraler Organisation’ [Democracy and Market Economy: Direct and Indirect Forms of Decentralized Organization], in Good, Andreas & Platipodis, Bettina (eds.), Direkte Demokratie: Herausforderungen zwischen Politik und Recht, Festschrift für Andreas Auer zum 65. Geburtstag [Direct Democracy: Challenges between Politics and Law, Festschrift for Andreas Auer on the Occasion of his 65th Birthday] (Bern: Stämpfli, 2013), 121–34Google Scholar

Heinemann, Andreas & Mara Meier, Giulia, ‘Der Digital Markets Act (DMA): Neues “Plattformrecht” für mehr Wettbewerb in der digitalen Wirtschaft’ [‘The Digital Markets Act (DMA): New “Platform Law” for More Competition in the Digital Economy’], 23 Zeitschrift für Europarecht [Journal of European Law] 86–101 (2021)Google Scholar

Helberger, Natali, ‘The Political Power of Platforms: How Current Attempts to Regulate Misinformation Amplify Opinion Power’, 8 Digital Journalism 842–54 (2020)Google Scholar

Helle, Horst J., ‘Soziologie der Konkurrenz – Sociology of Competition by Georg Simmel’, 33 Canadian Journal of Sociology 945–56 (2008)Google Scholar

Herrera Anchustegui, Ignacio, ‘Competition Law through an Ordoliberal Lens’, 2 Oslo Law Review 139–74 (2015)Google Scholar

Hill, Jennifer G. & Thomas, Randall S. (eds.), Research Handbook on Shareholder Power (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2015)Google Scholar

Reid Hoffman with GPT-4, Impromptu: Amplifying Our Humanity Through AI (Anacortes: Dallepedia, 2023)Google Scholar

Hoffman, Steven S., The Five Forces That Change Everything: How Technology Is Shaping Our Future (Dallas: Matt Holt, 2021)Google Scholar

Horton, Thomas J., ‘Restoring Antitrust’s Lost Values’, 16 University of New Hampshire Law Review 179–242 (2018)Google Scholar

Hovenkamp, Erik, ‘Platform Antitrust’, 44 The Journal of Corporation Law 713–52 (2019)Google Scholar

Hovenkamp, Erik, ‘The Antitrust Duty to Deal in the Age of Big Tech’, 131 Yale Law Journal 1483–558 (2022)Google Scholar

Hovenkamp, Erik, ‘Big Tech “Self-Preferencing” Bills May Hurt – Not Help – Antitrust Reform’, ProMarket (8 June 2022)Google Scholar

Hovenkamp, Herbert, Federal Antitrust Policy: The Law of Competition and Its Practice, 5th edn (St. Paul: West Academic Publishing, 2015)Google Scholar

Hovenkamp, Herbert, ‘Is Antitrust’s Consumer Welfare Principle Imperiled?’, 45 The Journal of Corporation Law 101–30 (2019)Google Scholar

Hovenkamp, Herbert, Principles of Antitrust, 2nd edn (St. Paul: West Academic Publishing, 2021)Google Scholar

Hovenkamp, Herbert, ‘Antitrust and Platform Monopoly’, 130 Yale Law Journal 1952–2050 (2021)Google Scholar

Hovenkamp, Herbert, ‘The Sherman Act and Abuse of Dominance in the Age of Networks’, ProMarket (20 December 2021)Google Scholar

Hovenkamp, Herbert, ‘President Biden’s Executive Order on Competition: An Antitrust Analysis’, 64 Arizona Law Review 383–416 (2022)Google Scholar

Hovenkamp, Herbert, ‘Are Monopolists or Cartels the True Source of Anticompetitive US Political Power?’, ProMarket (3 August 2022)Google Scholar

Hovenkamp, Herbert, ‘Antitrust Interoperability Remedies’, 123 Columbia Law Review Forum 1–36 (2023)Google Scholar

Hovenkamp, Herbert, ‘Monopolizing Digital Commerce’, 64 William & Mary Law Review 1677–755 (2023)Google Scholar

Hovenkamp, Herbert, ‘The Slogans and Goals of Antitrust Law’, 1–89, SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4121866# (May 2023), New York University Journal of Legislation and Public Policy (forthcoming 2023)Google Scholar

Hovenkamp, Herbert, ‘The Antitrust Text’, 1–94, SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4277914 (May 2023), Indiana Law Journal (forthcoming 2023 or 2024)Google Scholar

Hutchinson, Christophe Samuel, ‘Potential Abuses of Dominance by Big Tech through Their Use of Big Data and AI’, 10 Journal of Antitrust Enforcement 443–68 (2022)Google Scholar

Huttenlauch, Anna Blume, ‘Artikel 102 AEUV’ [Article 102 TFEU], in Loewenheim, , Meessen, , Riesenkampff, , Kersting, & Meyer-Lindemann, (eds.), Kartellrecht, 611–88, paras. 178–314Google Scholar

Ibáñez Colomo, Pablo, ‘Exclusionary Discrimination under Article 102 TFEU’, 51 Common Market Law Review 141–63 (2014)Google Scholar

Immenga, Ulrich & Mestmäcker, Ernst-Joachim (Torsten Körber, Heike Schweitzer & Daniel Zimmer, eds.), Wettbewerbsrecht [Competition Law], Band 1. EU: Kommentar zum Europäischen Kartellrecht [Volume 1. UE – Commentary on European Competition Law], 6th edn (Munich: Beck, 2019)Google Scholar

Immenga, Ulrich & Mestmäcker, Ernst-Joachim (Torsten Körber, Heike Schweitzer & Daniel Zimmer, eds.), Wettbewerbsrecht [Competition Law], Band 2. GWB: Kommentar zum Deutschen Kartellrecht [Volume 2. ARC – Commentary on German Competition Law], 6th edn (Munich: Beck, 2020)Google Scholar

Iyori, Hiroshi, ‘A Comparison of U.S.-Japan Antitrust Law: Looking at the International Harmonization of Competition Law’, 4 Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal 59–91 (1995)Google Scholar

Japan Fair Trade Commission, Guidelines Concerning Companies Which Constitute an Excessive Concentration of Economic Power (Tokyo: JFTC, 12 November 2002)Google Scholar

Japan Fair Trade Commission, Guidelines for Exclusionary Private Monopolization under the Antimonopoly Act (Tokyo: JFTC, 28 October 2009, revised 25 December 2020)Google Scholar

Jarass, Hans D., ‘Zum Verhältnis von Grundrechtecharta und sonstigem Recht’ [On the Relationship between the Charter of Fundamental Rights and Other Law], 48 Europarecht [European Law] 29–44 (2013)Google Scholar

Jarass, Hans D., Charta der Grundrechte der Europäischen Union: Kommentar [Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union: Commentary], 4th edn (Munich: Beck, 2021)Google Scholar

Jean, Aurélie, Les algorithmes font-ils la loi ? [Do Algorithms Make the Law?] (Paris: L’Observatoire, 2021)Google Scholar

Jenny, Frédéric, ‘Competition Law and Digital Ecosystems: Learning to Walk Before We Run’, 30 Industrial and Corporate Change 1143–67 (2021)Google Scholar

Jones, Colin P. A. & Ravitch, Frank S., The Japanese Legal System (St Paul: West Academic Publishing, 2019)Google Scholar

Jørgensen, Rikke Frank (ed.), Human Rights in the Age of Platforms (Cambridge: MIT Press, 2019)Google Scholar

Kades, Michael & Scott Morton, Fiona M., ‘Interoperability as a Competition Remedy for Digital Networks’, 1–39, SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3808372 (February 2021)Google Scholar

Kahneman, Daniel, Sibony, Olivier & Sunstein, Cass R., Noise: A Flaw in Human Judgment (London: William Collins, 2021, 2022 for the paperback edition)Google Scholar

Kairouz, Peter, McMahan, H. Brendan et al., ‘Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learning’, 14/1–2 Foundations and Trends^® in Machine Learning 1–210 (23 June 2021)Google Scholar

Kalbhenn, Jan Christopher, ‘European Legislative Initiative for Very Large Communication Platforms’, in Bayer, , Holznagel, , Korpisaari, & Woods, (eds.), Perspectives on Platform Regulation, 47–76Google Scholar

Kanaan, Michael, T-Minus AI: Humanity’s Countdown to Artificial Intelligence and the New Pursuit of Global Power (Dallas: BenBella, 2020)Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel, The Metaphysics of Morals (Denis, Lara ed. & Gregor, Mary ed. & trans., 2nd edn, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018, first published in German in 1797)Google Scholar

Kaplow, Louis, ‘On the Relevance of Market Power’, 130 Harvard Law Review 1303–407 (2017)Google Scholar

Karanikioti, Theano, ‘The EU Data Act – The Commission’s Latest Legislative Initiative’, The Platform Law Blog, 25 February 2022, https://theplatformlaw.blog/2022/02/25/the-eu-data-act-the-commissions-latest-legislative-initiative/amp/Google Scholar

Kathuria, Vikas & Globocnik, Jure, ‘Exclusionary Conduct in Data-driven Markets: Limitations of Data Sharing Remedy’, 8 Journal of Antitrust Enforcement 511–34 (2020)Google Scholar

Katsifis, Dimitrios, ‘General Court of the EU Delivers Landmark Google Shopping Judgment (Google and Alphabet v Commission, T-612/17)’, The Platform Law Blog, 15 November 2021, https://theplatformlaw.blog/2021/11/15/general-court-of-the-eu-delivers-landmark-google-shopping-judgment-google-and-alphabet-v-commission-t-612–17/Google Scholar

Katz, Ariel, ‘The Chicago School and the Forgotten Political Dimension of Antitrust Law’, 87 University of Chicago Law Review 413–58 (2020)Google Scholar

Kavanagh, Aileen, ‘The Constitutional Separation of Powers’, in Dyzenhaus, & Thorburn, (eds.), Constitutional Law, 221–39Google Scholar

Kaysen, Carl & Turner, Donald F., Antitrust Policy: An Economic and Legal Analysis (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1959)Google Scholar

Kellerbauer, Manuel, Klamert, Marcus & Tomkin, Jonathan (eds.), The EU Treaties and the Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 2019)Google Scholar

Këllezi, Pranvera, Les mesures correctives dans les cas de concentrations d’entreprises et d’abus de position dominante [Corrective Remedies in Merger and Abuse of Dominance Cases] (Bern, Paris & Brussels: Stämpfli, L.G.D.J. & Bruylant, 2010)Google Scholar

Kethledge, Raymond M., ‘Hayek and the Rule of Law: Implications for Unenumerated Rights and the Administrative State’, 13 New York University Journal of Law & Liberty 193–219 (2020)Google Scholar

Kettemann, Matthias C. & Fertmann, Martin, Platform-Proofing Democracy: Social Media Councils as Tools to Increase the Public Accountability of Online Platforms (Potsdam-Babelsberg: Friedrich Naumann Foundation for Freedom, May 2021)Google Scholar

Keynes, John Maynard, The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money (London: Macmillan, 1936)Google Scholar

Keyte, James, ‘Why the Atlantic Divide on Monopoly/Dominance Law and Enforcement Is So Difficult to Bridge’, 33 Antitrust 113–19 (2018)Google Scholar

Khan, Lina M., ‘Amazon’s Antitrust Paradox’, Note, 126 Yale Law Journal 710–805 (2017)Google Scholar

Khan, Lina M., ‘The New Brandeis Movement: America’s Antimonopoly Debate’, 9 Journal of European Competition Law & Practice 131–32 (2018)Google Scholar

Khan, Lina M., ‘The Separation of Platforms and Commerce’, 119 Columbia Law Review 973–1098 (2019)Google Scholar

Khan, Lina M., ‘The End of Antitrust History Revisited’, 133 Harvard Law Review 1655–82 (2020)Google Scholar

Khan, Lina M., ‘The Word “Efficiency” Doesn’t Appear Anywhere in the Antitrust Statutes’, Interview with Guy Rolnik, ProMarket (3 June 2022)Google Scholar

Khan, Lina M. & Vaheesan, Sandeep, ‘Market Power and Inequality: The Antitrust Counterrevolution and Its Discontents’, 11 Harvard Law & Policy Review 235–94 (2017)Google Scholar

Kim, Yunsieg P., ‘Does the Anti-Google Law Actually Help Google and Hurt Startups?’, 110 Georgetown Law Journal Online 120–34 (2021)Google Scholar

Kirkwood, John B., ‘Predation and Discrimination’, in Akman, Brook & Stylianou (eds.), Abuse, 140–61Google Scholar

Kissinger, Henry A., Schmidt, Eric & Huttenlocher, Daniel, The Age of AI: And Our Human Future (London: John Murray, 2021)Google Scholar

Kjeldahl, Trine M., ‘Defence of a Concept: Raymond Aron and Totalitarianism’, 2 Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions 121–41 (2001)Google Scholar

Klobuchar, Amy, Antitrust: Taking on Monopoly Power from the Gilded Age to the Digital Age (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2021)Google Scholar

Klonick, Kate, ‘The Facebook Oversight Board: Creating an Independent Institution to Adjudicate Online Free Expression’, 129 Yale Law Journal 2418–99 (2020)Google Scholar

Klump, Rainer & Wörsdörfer, Manuel, ‘An Ordoliberal Interpretation of Adam Smith’, 61 ORDO – Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft [Ordo – Yearbook of Economic and Social Order] 29–52 (2010)Google Scholar

Kobel, Pierre, Këllezi, Pranvera & Kilpatrick, Bruce (eds.), Competition Law Analysis of Price and Non-price Discrimination & Abusive IP Based Legal Proceedings (Cham: Springer, 2021)Google Scholar

Korinek, Anton, ‘Why We Need a New Agency to Regulate Advanced Artificial Intelligence: Lessons on AI Control from the Facebook Files’, Report, Brookings Institution (2021)Google Scholar

Kovacic, William E., ‘Failed Expectations: The Troubled Past and Uncertain Future of the Sherman Act as a Tool for Deconcentration’, 74 Iowa Law Review 1105–50 (1989)Google Scholar

Kraakman, Reinier, Armour, John, Davies, Paul, Enriques, Luca, Hansmann, Henry, Hertig, Gerard, Hopt, Klaus, Kanda, Hideki, Pargendler, Mariana, Ringe, Wolf-Georg & Rock, Edward, The Anatomy of Corporate Law: A Comparative and Functional Approach, 3rd edn (Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 2017)Google Scholar

Krause, Sharon, ‘Despotism in The Spirit of Laws’, in Carrithers, , Mosher, & Rahe, (eds.), Montesquieu’s Science of Politics, 231–71Google Scholar

Kühling, Jürgen, ‘Die sieben Herausforderungen für eine wettbewerbliche Ordnung’ [Seven Challenges for the Competition Regime], 72 Wirtschaft und Wettbewerb [Economy and Competition] 522–29 (2022)Google Scholar

Kuhner, Timothy K., ‘The Separation of Business and State’, 95 California Law Review 2353–91 (2007)Google Scholar

Künzler, Adrian, ‘Economic Content of Competition Law: The Point of Regulating Preferences’, in Zimmer, (ed.), Goals, 182–213Google Scholar

Kurz, Heinz D., Schütz, Marlies, Strohmaier, Rita & Zilian, Stella S. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Smart Technologies: An Economic and Social Perspective (London: Routledge, 2022)Google Scholar

Kusunoki, Shigeki, ‘Hayek and Antitrust’, 61 History of Economics Review 57–68 (2015)Google Scholar

Kwoka, John & Valletti, Tommaso, ‘Unscrambling the Eggs: Breaking Up Consummated Mergers and Dominant Firms’, 30 Industrial and Corporate Change 1286–306 (2021)Google Scholar

Labrousse, Agnès & Weisz, Jean-Daniel (eds.), Institutional Economics in France and Germany: German Ordoliberalism versus the French Regulation School (Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer, 2001)Google Scholar

Lakier, Genevieve, The Limits of Antimonopoly Law as a Solution to the Problems of the Platform Public Sphere (New York: Knight First Amendment Institute, 2020)Google Scholar

Lamoreaux, Naomi R., ‘The Problem of Bigness: From Standard Oil to Google’, 33 Journal of Economic Perspectives 94–117 (2019)Google Scholar

Lancieri, Filippo & Morita Sakowski, Patricia, ‘Competition in Digital Markets: A Review of Expert Reports’, 26 Stanford Journal of Law, Business & Finance 65–170 (2021)Google Scholar

Landemore, Hélène, Open Democracy: Reinventing Popular Rule for the Twenty-First Century (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2020)Google Scholar

Landemore, Hélène, ‘Open Democracy and Digital Technologies’, in Bernholz, , Landemore, & Reich, (eds.), Digital Technology and Democratic Theory, 62–89Google Scholar

Langlois, Ganaele & Elmer, Greg, ‘Impersonal Subjectivation from Platforms to Infrastructures’, 41 Media, Culture & Society 236–51 (2019)Google Scholar

LaPira, Timothy M. & Thomas, Herschel F., Revolving Door Lobbying: Public Service, Private Influence, and the Unequal Representation of Interests (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2017)Google Scholar

Larouche, Pierre & de Streel, Alexandre, ‘The European Digital Markets Act: A Revolution Grounded on Traditions’, 12 Journal of European Competition Law & Practice 542–60 (2021)Google Scholar

Larouche, Pierre & de Streel, Alexandre, ‘A Compass on the Journey to Successful DMA Implementation’, 2022/3 Concurrences | On-Topic 26–30Google Scholar

Larrère, Catherine, ‘Montesquieu on Economics and Commerce’, in Carrithers, , Mosher, & Rahe, (eds.), Montesquieu’s Science of Politics, 335–73Google Scholar

Cun, Yann Le, Quand la machine apprend – La révolution des neurones artificiels et de l’apprentissage profond [When Machines Learn: The Revolution of Artificial Neurons and Deep Learning] (Paris: Odile Jacob, 2019)Google Scholar

Lee, Kai-Fu & Chen, Qiufan, AI 2041: Ten Visions for Our Future (New York: Currency, 2021)Google Scholar

Lemaire, Christophe & Sevy, David, ‘International Report’, in Kobel, , Këllezi, & Kilpatrick, (eds.), Competition Law, 3–54Google Scholar

Lemley, Mark A., ‘The Contradictions of Platform Regulation’, 1 Journal of Free Speech Law 303–36 (2021)Google Scholar

Lenaerts, Koen & Gutiérrez-Fons, José Antonio, ‘The Place of the Charter in the European Legal Space’, in Peers, , Hervey, , Kenner, & Ward, (eds.), Charter, 1711–34Google Scholar

Lessig, Lawrence, ‘A Reply to Professor Hasen’, 126 Harvard Law Review Forum 61–74 (2013)Google Scholar

Lessig, Lawrence, They Don’t Represent Us: Reclaiming Our Democracy (New York: Dey Street Books, 2019)Google Scholar

Lévêque, François, Les entreprises hyperpuissantes – Géants et Titans, la fin du modèle global? [Hyperpowerful Companies: Giants and Titans, the End of the Global Model?] (Paris: Odile Jacob, 2021)Google Scholar

Levinson, Daryl J. & Pildes, Richard H., ‘Separation of Parties, Not Powers’, 119 Harvard Law Review 2311–86 (2006)Google Scholar

Liedke, Jacob & Matsa, Katerina Eva, Social Media and News Fact Sheet (Washington: Pew Research Center, 2022)Google Scholar

Lochak, Danièle, ‘Les lanceurs d’alerte et les droits de l’homme : réflexions conclusives’ [Whistleblowers and Human Rights: Concluding Thoughts], 10 La Revue des droits de l’homme [The Human Rights Review] 1–22 (2016)Google Scholar

Locke, John, Second Treatise of Government: An Essay Concerning the True Original, Extent and End of Civil Government (London: Awnsham Churchill, 1689)Google Scholar

Loewenheim, Ulrich, Meessen, Karl M., Riesenkampff, Alexander, Kersting, Christian & Meyer-Lindemann, Hans-Jürgen (eds.), Kartellrecht: Kommentar zum Deutschen und Europäischen Recht [Competition Law: Commentary on German and European Law], 4th edn (Munich: Beck, 2020)Google Scholar

Lovdahl Gormsen, Liza, ‘Algorithmic Antitrust and Consumer Choice’, in Portuese, (ed.), Algorithmic Antitrust, 65–86Google Scholar

Lüdemann, Jörn, ‘Grundrechtliche Vorgaben für die Löschung von Beiträgen in sozialen Netzwerken’ [Fundamental Rights Requirements for the Deletion of Contributions on Social Networks], 22 Multimedia und Recht – Zeitschrift für IT-Recht und Recht der Digitalisierung [Multimedia and Law – Journal for IT Law and Digitalization Law] 279–84 (2019)Google Scholar

Lukes, Steven, ‘Robert Dahl on Power’, 8 Journal of Political Power 261–71 (2015)Google Scholar

Lukes, Steven, ‘Power and Economics’, in Skidelsky, Robert & Craig, Nan (eds.), Who Runs the Economy? The Role of Power in Economics (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016), 17–25Google Scholar

Lundqvist, Björn & Gal, Michal S. (eds.), Competition Law for the Digital Economy (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2019)Google Scholar

Lurie, Yotam & Frenkel, David A., ‘Corporate Governance: Separation of Powers and Checks and Balances in Israeli Corporate Law’, 12 Business Ethics: A European Review 275–83 (2003)Google Scholar

Mackenzie, Ross, Goeteyn, Geert, Mantine, Michelle & Westrup, Michaela, ‘Competition Law in the Metaverse: Preparing for the New Regulatory Frontier’, Competition Law Insight, 12 July 2021Google Scholar

Maher, Imelda, ‘Re-imagining the Story of European Competition Law’, 20 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 155–66 (2000)Google Scholar

Mahoney, Daniel J., ‘The Totalitarian Negation of Man: Raymond Aron on Ideology and Totalitarianism’, in Colen, & Dutartre-Michaut, (eds.), Aron, 137–48Google Scholar

Maier-Rigaud, Frank, ‘On the Normative Foundations of Competition Law – Efficiency, Political Freedom and the Freedom to Compete’, in Zimmer, (ed.), Goals, 132–68Google Scholar

Mäihäniemi, Beata, Competition Law and Big Data: Imposing Access to Information in Digital Markets (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2020)Google Scholar

Mandrescu, Daniel, ‘Abusive Pricing Practices by Online Platforms: A Framework Review of Article 102 TFEU for Future Cases’, 10 Journal of Antitrust Enforcement 469–517 (2022)Google Scholar

Manning, John F., ‘Separation of Powers and Ordinary Interpretation’, 124 Harvard Law Review 1939–2040 (2011)Google Scholar

Marco Colino, Sandra, ‘The Incursion of Antitrust into China’s Platform Economy’, 67 Antitrust Bulletin 237–58 (2022)Google Scholar

Marcus, Gary, ‘How Do We Ensure an A.I. Future That Allows for Human Thriving?’, Interview with David Marchese, New York Times, online edition, www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/05/02/magazine/ai-gary-marcus.html (1 May 2023)Google Scholar

Martenet, Vincent, ‘Les autorités de la concurrence et la liberté économique’ [Competition Authorities and Economic Freedom], 17 Pratique juridique actuelle [Current Legal Practice] 963–82 (2008)Google Scholar

Martenet, Vincent, Architecture des pouvoirs : Enjeux et perspectives pour un État, une union d’États et les Nations Unies [Architecture of Powers: Challenges and Perspectives for a State, A Union of States and The United Nations] (Geneva/Zurich & Paris: Schulthess & L.G.D.J., 2016)Google Scholar

Martenet, Vincent, Pour un Pacte européen [For a European Pact] (Geneva/Zurich & Paris: Schulthess & L.G.D.J., 2017)Google Scholar

Martenet, Vincent, ‘La séparation des pouvoirs’ [Separation of Powers], in Diggelmann, Oliver, Hertig Randall, Maya & Schindler, Benjamin (eds.), Verfassungsrecht der Schweiz – Droit constitutionnel suisse [Swiss Constitutional Law] (Zurich/Geneva: Schulthess, 2020), 999–1023Google Scholar

Marty, Frédéric, ‘Politiques européennes de concurrence et économie sociale de marché’ [European Competition Policies and Social Market Economy], in Potvin-Solis, (ed.), Valeurs communes, 341–77Google Scholar

Massarotto, Giovanna, ‘Can Antitrust Trust Blockchain?’, in Portuese, (ed.), Algorithmic Antitrust, 121–54Google Scholar

Masterman, Roger & Schütze, Robert (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Comparative Constitutional Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019)Google Scholar

Matsui, Shigenori, ‘The Principle of Separation of Powers in Japan’, 5 Journal of International and Comparative Law 387–410 (2018)Google Scholar

Matsushita, Mitsuo, ‘The Antimonopoly Law of Japan’, in Graham, & Richardson, (eds.), Global Competition Policy, 151–97Google Scholar

Mazzoleni, Gianpietro (ed.-in-chief), The International Encyclopedia of Political Communication, 3 volumes (Chichester: Wiley Blackwell, 2016)Google Scholar

Mazzucato, Mariana, Mission Economy: A Moonshot Guide to Changing Capitalism (London: Allen Lane, 2021)Google Scholar

Mazzucato, Mariana, Entsminger, Josh & Kattel, Rainer, ‘Reshaping Platform-Driven Digital Markets’, in Moore, & Tambini, (eds.), Regulating Big Tech, 17–34Google Scholar

McCarty, Nolan & Shahshahani, Sepehr, ‘Testing Political Antitrust’, 1–75, SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4363447 (March 2023), 98 New York University Law Review (forthcoming 2023)Google Scholar

McGaughey, Ewan, ‘The Codetermination Bargains: The History of German Corporate and Labor Law’, 23 Columbia Journal of European Law 135–76 (2016)Google Scholar

Mélonio, Françoise & Manzini, Charlotte (textes choisis par) [Texts Chosen by], L’abécédaire d’Alexis de Tocqueville [The Primer on Alexis de Tocqueville] (Paris: Éditions de l’Observatoire, 2021)Google Scholar

Mendelsohn, Juliane, ‘Agenda 2025: Hello, Mandated Unbundling, My Old Friend’, D’Kart – Antitrust Blog (22 April 2022)Google Scholar

Ménissier, Thierry, Philosophie de la corruption [Philosophy of Corruption] (Paris: Hermann, 2018)Google Scholar

Ménissier, Thierry, ‘Un “moment machiavélien” pour l’intelligence artificielle? La Déclaration de Montréal pour un développement responsable de l’IA’ [A ‘Machiavellian Moment’ for Artificial Intelligence? The Montreal Declaration for a Responsible Development of AI], 77 Raisons politiques [Political Reasons] 67–81 (2020)Google Scholar

Ménissier, Thierry, ‘Les Nouvelles figures du Prince’ [The New Figures of the Prince], Interview with Ortoli, Sven & Pollet-Bourdaloue, Edern, Philosophie Magazine hors-série ‘Machiavel: Comment le pouvoir se prend, se garde ou se perd’ [Philosophy Magazine special issue ‘Machiavelli: How Power Is Taken, Kept or Lost’] 96–102 (2022)Google Scholar

Mestmäcker, Ernst-Joachim, ‘Private Macht – Grundsatzfragen in Recht, Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft’ [Private Power – Fundamental Issues in Law, Economy and Society], in Möslein, (ed.), Macht, 25–45Google Scholar

Meyer, Jürgen & Hölscheidt, Sven (eds.), Charta der Grundrechte der Europäischen Union [Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union], 5th edn (Baden-Baden, Bern & Basel: Nomos, Stämpfli & Facultas, 2019)Google Scholar

Meyerson, Denise, ‘The Rule of Law and the Separation of Powers’, 4 Macquarie Law Journal 1–6 (2004)Google Scholar

Micklitz, Hans-W., Pollicino, Oreste, Reichman, Amnon, Simoncini, Andrea, Sartor, Giovanni & Gregorio, Giovanni De (eds.), Constitutional Challenges in the Algorithmic Society (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022)Google Scholar

Millon, David, ‘The Sherman Act and the Balance of Power’, 61 Southern California Law Review 1219–92 (1988)Google Scholar

Mir, Aimen, Christine Laciak & Sarah Melanson, ‘United States: CFIUS Review’, Global Competition Review’s Americas Antitrust Review 2022 68–85Google Scholar

Möllers, Christoph, The Three Branches: A Comparative Model of Separation of Powers (Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 2013)Google Scholar

Möllers, Christoph, ‘Separation of Powers’, in Masterman, & Schütze, (eds.), Comparative Constitutional Law, 230–57Google Scholar

Monopolkommission, Wettbewerb 2020 – XXIII. Hauptgutachten der Monopolkommission gemäß § 44 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GWB [Competition 2020 – XXIII. Biennial Report by the Monopolies Commission in Accordance with Section 44 Paragraph 1 Sentence 1 of the German Act against Restraints of Competition] (Bonn: Monopolkommission, 2020)Google Scholar

Monopolkommission, Wettbewerb 2022 – XXIV. Hauptgutachten der Monopolkommission gemäß § 44 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GWB [Competition 2022 – XXIV. Biennial Report by the Monopolies Commission in Accordance with Section 44 Paragraph 1 Sentence 1 of the German Act against Restraints of Competition] (Bonn: Monopolkommission, 2022)Google Scholar

Louis de Secondat, Charles, Montesquieu, Baron de La Brède et de, The Spirit of the Laws (Cohler, Anne M., Carolyn Miller, Basia & Samuel Stone, Harold eds. & trans., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989, first published in French in 1748 under the title L’esprit des lois)Google Scholar

Louis de Secondat, Charles, Montesquieu, Baron de La Brède et de, The Spirit of Law (Philip Steward trans., Lyon: E.N.S., 2018, last updated on 1 October 2021, a new translation of L’esprit des lois, http://montesquieu.ens-lyon.fr/spip.php?rubrique186)Google Scholar

Monti, Giorgio, ‘Taming Digital Monopolies: A Comparative Account of the Evolution of Antitrust and Regulation in the European Union and the United States’, 67 Antitrust Bulletin 40–68 (2022)Google Scholar

Montreal Declaration for a Responsible Development of Artificial Intelligence (2018)Google Scholar

Moore, Martin, ‘Creating New Electoral Public Spheres’, in Moore, & Tambini, (eds.), Regulating Big Tech, 221–34Google Scholar

Moore, Martin & Tambini, Damian (eds.), Digital Dominance: The Power of Google, Amazon, Facebook, and Apple (Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 2018)Google Scholar

Moore, Martin & Tambini, Damian (eds.), Regulating Big Tech: Policy Responses to Digital Dominance (Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 2021)Google Scholar

Moore, Martin & Tambini, Damian (eds.), ‘Conclusion: Without a Holistic Vision, Democratic Media Reforms May Fail’, in Moore, & Tambini, (eds.), Regulating Big Tech, 338–47Google Scholar

Morriss, Peter, Power: A Philosophical Analysis, 2nd edn (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2002)Google Scholar

Morriss, Peter, ‘A Response to Pamela Pansardi’, 5 Journal of Political Power 91–99 (2012)Google Scholar

Möschel, Wernhard, ‘Competition Policy from an Ordo Point of View’, in Peacock, Alan & Willgerodt, Hans (eds.), German Neo-Liberals and the Social Market Economy (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1989), 142–59Google Scholar

Möslein, Florian (ed.), Private Macht [Private Power] (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2016)Google Scholar

Müller, Jan-Werner, ‘Democracy’s Critical Infrastructure: Rethinking Intermediary Powers’, 47/3 Philosophy & Social Criticism 269–82 (2021)Google Scholar

Müller, Jan-Werner, Democracy Rules (London: Allen Lane, 2021)Google Scholar

Mystakidis, Stylianos, ‘Metaverse’, 2 Encyclopedia 486–97 (2022)Google Scholar

Nachbar, Thomas B., ‘The Antitrust Constitution’, 99 Iowa Law Review 57–114 (2013)Google Scholar

Napoli, Philip M., ‘Treating Dominant Digital Platforms as Public Trustees’, in Moore, & Tambini, (eds.), Regulating Big Tech, 151–68Google Scholar

Narula, Herman, Virtual Society: The Metaverse and the New Frontiers of Human Experience (New York: Currency, 2022)Google Scholar

Naughton, John, ‘Platform Power and Responsibility in the Attention Economy’, in Moore, & Tambini, (eds.), Digital Dominance, 371–95Google Scholar

Nazzini, Renato, The Foundations of European Union Competition Law: The Objective and Principles of Article 102 (Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 2011)Google Scholar

Nazzini, Renato, ‘Google and the (Ever-stretching) Boundaries of Article 102 TFEU’, 6 Journal of European Competition Law & Practice 301–14 (2015)Google Scholar

Nemitz, Paul, ‘Constitutional Democracy and Technology in the Age of Artificial Intelligence’, 376 Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 1–14 (2018)Google Scholar

Nemitz, Paul & Pfeffer, Matthias, ‘Determining Our Technological and Democratic Future’, in Moore, & Tambini, (eds.), Regulating Big Tech, 280–98Google Scholar

Nettesheim, Martin & Thomas, Stefan, Entflechtung im deutschen Kartellrecht: Wettbewerbspolitik, Verfassungsrecht, Wettbewerbsrecht [Deconcentration in German Cartel Law: Competition Policy, Constitutional Law, Competition Law] (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2011)Google Scholar

Newman, John M., ‘Antitrust in Digital Markets’, 72 Vanderbilt Law Review 1497–561 (2019)Google Scholar

Newman, Nathan, ‘Search, Antitrust, and the Economics of the Control of User Data’, 31 Yale Journal on Regulation 401–54 (2014)Google Scholar

Nihoul, Paul & Skoczny, Tadeusz (eds.), Procedural Fairness in Competition Proceedings (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2015)Google Scholar

Nosthoff, Anna-Verena & Felix Maschewski, ‘Big Data and the Platform Economy: On Infrastructural Power’, Presentation for the United Nations Expert Group Meeting on Population, Food Security, Nutrition, and Sustainable Development, 1–8 www.academia.edu/44424738/Big_Data_and_the_Platform_Economy_On_Infrastructural_Power_Presentation_at_United_Nations_Expert_Meeting_Oct_29th_2020 (29 October 2020)Google Scholar

Obertone, Laurent, Game Over: La révolution antipolitique [Game Over: The Anti-political Revolution] (Paris: Magnus, 2022)Google Scholar

O’Donoghue, Robert & Padilla, Jorge, The Law and Economics of Article 102 TFEU, 3rd edn (Oxford: Hart, 2020)Google Scholar

OECD, Post-Public Employment: Good Practices for Preventing Conflict of Interest (Paris: OECD Publishing, 2010)Google Scholar

OECD, Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises (Paris: OECD Publishing, 2011)Google Scholar

OECD, Procedural Fairness and Transparency: Key Points (Paris: OECD Publishing, 2012)Google Scholar

OECD, Quality Considerations in Digital Zero-Price Markets (Paris: OECD Publishing, 2018)Google Scholar

OECD, Implications of E-commerce for Competition Policy (Paris: OECD Publishing, 2019)Google Scholar

OECD, The Standard of Review by Courts in Competition Cases, Background Note by the Secretariat (Paris: OECD, 14 May 2019)Google Scholar

OECD, Abuse of Dominance in Digital Markets (Paris: OECD Publishing, 2020)Google Scholar

OECD, Start-ups, Killer Acquisitions and Merger Control (Paris: OECD Publishing, 2020)Google Scholar

OECD, Lobbying in the 21st Century: Transparency, Integrity and Access (Paris: OECD Publishing, 2021)Google Scholar

OECD, Ex Ante Regulation and Competition in Digital Markets (Paris: OECD Publishing, 2021)Google Scholar

OECD, Data Portability, Interoperability and Digital Platform Competition (Paris: OECD Publishing, 2021)Google Scholar

OECD, Competition Issues Concerning News Media and Digital Platforms (Paris: OECD Publishing, 2021)Google Scholar

OECD, Handbook on Competition Policy in the Digital Age (Paris: OECD Publishing, 2022)Google Scholar

Ohara, Yoshio, ‘International Application of the Japanese Antimonopoly Act’, 10 World Competition 5–40 (1986)Google Scholar

Ohlhausen, Maureen K. & Okuliar, Alexander P., ‘Competition, Consumer Protection, and the Right [Approach] to Privacy’, 80 Antitrust Law Journal 121–56 (2015)Google Scholar

O’Mara, Margaret, The Code: Silicon Valley and the Remaking of America (New York: Penguin, 2019)Google Scholar

Oxera, Market Power in Digital Platforms, Paper prepared for European Commission (Oxford: Oxera, 30 September 2018)Google Scholar

Pansardi, Pamela, ‘Power To and Power Over: Two Distinct Concepts of Power?’, 5 Journal of Political Power 73–89 (2012)Google Scholar

Pansardi, Pamela, ‘On Abilities and Power Again: A Reply to Peter Morriss’, 5 Journal of Political Power 493–97 (2012)Google Scholar

Parisi, Tony, ‘The Seven Rules of the Metaverse: A Framework for the Coming Immersive Reality’, Medium (22 October 2021)Google Scholar

Parker, Geoffrey G., Petropoulos, Georgios & Van Alstyne, Marshall, ‘Platform Mergers and Antitrust’, 30 Industrial and Corporate Change 1307–36 (2021)Google Scholar

Parker, Geoffrey G., Van Alstyne, Marshall W. & Choudary, Sangeet Paul, Platform Revolution: How Networked Markets Are Transforming the Economy – And How to Make Them Work for You (New York: W. W. Norton, 2016)Google Scholar

Pasquale, Frank, New Laws of Robotics: Defending Human Expertise in the Age of AI (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2020)Google Scholar

Patel, Kiran Klaus & Schweitzer, Heike (eds.), The Historical Foundations of EU Competition Law (Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 2013)Google Scholar

Patel, Kiran Klaus & Schweitzer, Heike (eds.), ‘Introduction’, in Patel, & Schweitzer, (eds.), Foundations, 1–18Google Scholar

Patino, Bruno, La civilisation du poisson rouge : Petit traité sur le marché de l’attention [The Goldfish Civilization: A Short Treatise on the Attention Market] (Paris: Grasset, 2019; Paris: Livre de Poche, 2022)Google Scholar

Paul, Sanjukta, ‘Beyond Neoliberal Antitrust’, Boston Review (23 June 2022)Google Scholar

Pechstein, Matthias, Nowak, Carsten & Häde, Ulrich (eds.), Frankfurter Kommentar zu EUV, GRC und AEUV, Band I [Frankfurt Commentary on TEU, CFR and TFEU], volume I (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2017)Google Scholar

Peers, Steve, Hervey, Tamara, Kenner, Jeff & Ward, Angela (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, 2nd edn (Oxford: Hart, 2021)Google Scholar

Persch, Johannes, ‘The Role of Fundamental Rights in Antitrust Law – A Special Responsibility for Undertakings with Regulatory Power under Art. 102 TFEU?’, 17 European Competition Journal 542–66 (2021)Google Scholar

Persily, Nathaniel, ‘Platform Power, Online Speech, and the Search for New Constitutional Categories’, in Bollinger, & Stone, (eds.), Social Media, 193–211Google Scholar

Peters, Anne, ‘Menschenrechtsfunktionen jenseits des Staates’ [Human Rights Functions Beyond the State], in Grimm, , Peters, & Wielsch, , Grundrechtsfunktionen, 73–117Google Scholar

Petersen, Niels, ‘Antitrust Law and the Promotion of Democracy and Economic Growth’, 9 Journal of Competition Law & Economics 593–636 (2013)Google Scholar

Petit, Nicolas, Droit européen de la concurrence [European Competition Law], 3rd edn (Paris: L.G.D.J., 2020)Google Scholar

Petit, Nicolas, Big Tech and the Digital Economy: The Moligopoly Scenario (Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 2020)Google Scholar

Petit, Nicolas, ‘The Proposed Digital Markets Act (DMA): A Legal and Policy Review’, 12 Journal of European Competition Law & Practice 529–41 (2021)Google Scholar

Peukert, Alexander, ‘Five Reasons to be Skeptical about the DSA’, in Richter, , Straub, & Tuchtfeld, (eds.), Big Tech, 22–28Google Scholar

Philippon, Thomas, The Great Reversal: How America Gave Up on Free Markets (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2019, 2021 for the paperback edition)Google Scholar

Phillips, Angela & Maria Mazzoli, Eleonora, ‘Minimizing Data-Driven Targeting and Providing a Public Search Alternative’, in Moore, & Tambini, (eds.), Regulating Big Tech, 110–26Google Scholar

Picht, Peter, ‘Private Enforcement for the DSA/DGA/DMA Package’, in Richter, , Straub, & Tuchtfeld, (eds.), Big Tech, 98–102Google Scholar

Picker, Randy, ‘The House’s Recent Spate of Antitrust Bills Would Change Big Tech as We Know It’, ProMarket (29 June 2021)Google Scholar

Picker, Randy, ‘How Would the Big Tech Self-Preferencing Bill Affect Users?’, ProMarket (16 June 2022)Google Scholar

Picod, Fabrice, Rizcallah, Cecilia & Van Drooghenbroeck, Sébastien (eds.), Charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne : Commentaire article par article [Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union: Article-by-Article Commentary], 2nd edn (Brussels: Bruyland, 2020)Google Scholar

Pike, Chris & Carovano, Gabriele, ‘Reasons to Be Cheerful: The Benevolent Market Power of Decentralised Blockchains’, in Portuese, (ed.), Algorithmic Antitrust, 107–20Google Scholar