Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-08T22:48:02.515Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Niche dimensionality and ecological speciation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Patrik Nosil
Affiliation:
Zoology Department and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia
Luke Harmon
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Idaho
Roger Butlin
Affiliation:
University of Sheffield
Jon Bridle
Affiliation:
University of Bristol
Dolph Schluter
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia, Vancouver
Get access

Summary

The ecological niche plays a central role in the process of ‘ecological speciation’, in which divergent selection between niches drives the evolution of reproductive isolation (Muller 1942; Mayr 1947, 1963; Schluter & Nagel 1995; Funk 1998; Schluter 2000). Ecological by-product speciation occurs because ecological traits that have diverged between populations via divergent selection, or traits that are genetically correlated with such traits, incidentally affect reproductive isolation. This process can occur under any geographic arrangement of populations (e.g. allopatry, parapatry or sympatry). A central prediction of ecological speciation is that ecologically divergent pairs of populations will exhibit greater levels of reproductive isolation than ecologically similar pairs of populations of similar age. Another prediction is that traits under divergent selection, or those genetically correlated with them, should often incidentally affect reproductive isolation (e.g. mate preference, hybrid fitness). In recent years, these predictions have been supported in a range of taxa (see Feder et al. 1994; Funk 1998; Via 1999; Rundle et al. 2000; Jiggins et al. 2001; Funk et al. 2002, 2006; Bradshaw & Schemske 2003; Rundle & Nosil 2005; and Funk, this volume, for review), and processes such as resource competition and predation are now known to be involved (Mallet & Barton 1989; Schluter 1994; Rundle et al. 2003; Vamosi 2005; Nosil & Crespi 2006a).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnold, S. J. (1992) Constraints on phenotypic evolution. American Naturalist 140, S85–S107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arnold, M. L. (1997) Natural Hybridization and Evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Arnqvist, G. (1998) Comparative evidence for the evolution of genitalia by sexual selection. Nature 393, 784–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, J. S. F. and Cummins, L. J. (1969) The effect of selection for sternopleural bristle number on mating behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 61, 713–719.Google ScholarPubMed
Barker, J. S. F. and Karlsson, L. J. E. (1974) Effects of population size and selection intensity on responses to disruptive selection in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 78, 715–735.Google Scholar
Barton, N. and Bengtsson, B. O. (1986) The barrier to genetic exchange between hybridizing populations. Heredity 57, 357–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barton, N. H. and Rouhani, S. (1987) The frequency of shifts between alternative equilibria. Journal of Theoretical Biology 125, 397–418.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bateson, W. (1909) Heredity and variation in modern lights. In: Darwin and Modern Science (ed. Seward, A. C.), pp. 85–101. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Blows, M. W. and Hoffman, A. A. (2005) A reassessment of genetic limits to evolutionary change. Ecology 86, 1371–1384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boughman, J. W. (2002) How sensory drive can promote speciation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 10, 1–7.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, H. D. and Schemske, D. W. (2003) Allele substitution at a flower colour locus produces a pollinator shift in monkeyflowersNature 426, 176–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bridle, J. R. and Vines, T. H. (2006) Limits to evolution at range margins: when and why does adaptation fail?Trends in Ecology and Evolution 22, 140–147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chabora, A. J. (1968) Disruptive selection for sternopleural chaeta number in various strains of Drosophila melanogaster. American Naturalist 102, 525–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, K. M. A. and Moore, B. R. (2002) Whole-tree methods for detecting differential diversification rates. Systematic Biology 51, 855–865.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Charlesworth, B., Nordborg, M. and Charlesworth, D. (1997) The effects of local selection, balanced polymorphism and background selection on equilibrium patterns of genetic diversity in subdivided populations. Genetical Research 70, 155–174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chase, J. M. and Leibold, M. A. (2003) Ecological Niches: Linking Classical and Contemporary Approaches. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chenoweth, S. F. and Blows, M. (2006) Dissecting the complex genetic basis of mate choice. Nature Review Genetics 7, 681–692.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooper, M. L. (2000) Random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis of southern brown bandicoot (Isoodon obesulus) populations in Western Australia reveals genetic differentiation related to environmental variables. Molecular Ecology 9, 469–479.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cornwell, W. K., Schwilk, D. W. and Ackerly, D. D. (2006) A trait-based test for habitat filtering: convex hull volume. Ecology 87, 1465–1471.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coyne, J. A. and Grant, B. (1972) Disruptive selection on I-maze activity in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 11, 185–188.Google Scholar
Coyne, J. A. and Orr, H. A. (2004) Speciation. Sinauer Associates, Inc. Sunderland, MA.Google Scholar
Crespi, B. J. and Sandoval, C. P. (2000) Phylogenetic evidence for the evolution of ecological specialization in Timema walking-sticks. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 13, 249–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crossley, S. A. (1974) Changes in mating behavior produced by selection for ethological isolation between ebony and vestigial mutants of Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 28, 631–647.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oliveira, A. K. and Cordeiro, A. R. (1980) Adaptation of Drosophila willistoni experimental populations to extreme pH medium. Heredity 44, 123–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Queiroz, K. (2005) Ernst Mayr and the modern concept of species. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102, 6600–6607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
del Solar, E. (1966) Sexual isolation caused by selection for positive and negative phototaxis and geotaxis in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 56, 484–487.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dettman, J. R., Sirjusingh, C., Kohn, L. M. and Anderson, J. B. (2007) Incipient speciation by divergent adaptation and antagonistic epistasis in yeast. Nature 447, 585–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobzhansky, T. (1936) Studies on hybrid sterility. II. Localization of sterility factors in Drosophila pseudoobscura hybrids. Genetics 121, 113–125.Google Scholar
Dobzhansky, T. (1937) Genetics and the Origin of Species. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Dobzhansky, T. (1951) Genetics and the Origin of Species. 3rd edn. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Dobzhansky, T., Pavlovsky, O. and Powell, J. R. (1976) Partially successful attempt to enhance reproductive isolation between semispecies of Drosophila paulistorum. Evolution 30, 201–212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dodd, D. M. B. (1989) Reproductive isolation as a consequence of adaptive divergence in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Evolution 43, 1308–1311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dopman, E. B., Perez, L., Bogdanowicz, S. M. and Harrison, R. (2005) Consequences of reproductive barriers for genealogical discordance in the European corn borer. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102, 14706–14711.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drès, M. and Mallet, J. (2002) Host races in plant-feeding insects and their importance in sympatric speciation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 357, 471–492.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Egan, S. P., Nosil, P. and Funk, D. J. (2008) Selection and genomic differentiation during ecological speciation: isolating the contributions of host-association via a comparative genome scan of Neochlamisus bebbianae leaf beetles. Evolution 62, 1162–1181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrman, L. (1964) Genetic divergence in M. Vetukhiv's experimental populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetical Research 5, 150–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrman, L. (1969) Genetic divergence in M. Vetukhiv's experimental populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. 5. A further study of the rudiments of sexual isolation. American Midland Naturalist 82, 272–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrman, L. (1971) Natural selection for the origin of reproductive isolation. American Naturalist 105, 479–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrman, L. (1973) More on natural selection for the origin of reproductive isolation. American Naturalist 107, 318–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrman, L. (1979) Still more on natural selection for the origin of reproductive isolation. American Naturalist 113, 148–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elton, C. S. (1927) Animal Ecology. Sidwich & Jackson, London.Google Scholar
Endler, J. A. (1977) Geographic Variation, Speciation, and Clines. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google ScholarPubMed
Endler, J. A. (1986) Natural Selection in the Wild. Princeton University Press, NJ.Google Scholar
Fear, K. K. and Price, T. (1998) The adaptive surface in ecology. Oikos 82, 440–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feder, J. L., Opp, S. B., Wlazlo, B., et al. (1994) Host fidelity is an effective premating barrier between sympatric races of the apple maggot fly. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 91, 7990–7994.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Felsenstein, J. (1981) Skepticism towards Santa Rosalia, or why are there so few kinds of animals?Evolution 35, 124–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Florin, A.-B. and Ödeen, A. (2002) Laboratory experiments are not conducive for allopatric speciation. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 15, 10–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Funk, D. J. (1998) Isolating a role for natural selection in speciation: host adaptation and sexual isolation in Neochlamisus bebbianae leaf beetles. Evolution 52, 1744–1759.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Funk, D. J., Filchak, K. E. and Feder, J. L. (2002) Herbivorous insects: model systems for the comparative study of speciation ecology. Genetica 116, 251–267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Funk, D. J., Nosil, P. and Etges, W. (2006) Ecological divergence exhibits consistently positive associations with reproductive isolation across disparate taxa. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103, 3209–3213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Futuyma, D. J., Keese, M C. and Funk, D. J. (1995) Genetic constraints on macroevolution: the evolution of host affiliation in the leaf beetle genus Ophraella. Evolution 49, 797–809.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gavrilets, S. (2004) Fitness Landscapes and the Origin of Species. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Gavrilets, S. and Cruzan, M. B. (1998) Neutral gene flow across single locus clines. Evolution 52, 1277–1284.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gavrilets, S. and Vose, A. (2005) Dynamic patterns of adaptive radiation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102, 18040–18045.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grahame, J. W., Wilding, C. S. and Butlin, R. K. (2006) Adaptation to a steep environmental gradient and an associated barrier to gene exchange in Littorina saxatilis. Evolution 60, 268–278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grant, P. R. and Grant, B. R. (2002) Unpredictable evolution in a 30-year study of Darwin's finches. Science 296, 707–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, B. and Mettler, L. E. (1969) Disruptive and stabilizing selection on the ‘escape’ behavior of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 62, 625–637.Google ScholarPubMed
Green, R. H. (1971) A multivariate statistical approach to the Hutchinsonian niche: bivalve mollusks of central Canada. Ecology 52, 543–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grinnell, J. (1917) The niche relationships of the California thrasher. Auk 34, 427–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guillaume, G. and Rougemont, J. (2006) Nemo: an evolutionary and population genetics programming framework. Bioinformatics Applications Note 22, 2556–2557.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halliburton, R. and Gall, G. A. E. (1981) Disruptive selection and assortative mating in Tribolium castaneum. Evolution 35, 829–843.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harmon, L. J., Kolbe, J. J., Cheverud, J. M. and Losos, J. B. (2005) Convergence and the multidimensional niche. Evolution 59, 409–421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harvery, P. H., May, R. M. and Nee, S. (1994) Phylogenies without fossils. Evolution 48, 523–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawthorne, D. J. and Via, S. (2001) Genetic linkage of ecological specialization and reproductive isolation in pea aphids. Nature 412, 904–907.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hendry, A. P. and Taylor, E. B. (2004) How much of the variation in adaptive divergence can be explained by gene flow? An evaluation using lake-stream stickleback pairs. Evolution 58, 2319–2331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herrera, C. M., Cerdaâ, X., Garciaâ, M. B., et al. (2002) Floral integration, phenotypic covariance structure and pollinator variation in bumblebee-pollinated Helleborus foetidus. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 15, 108–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hey, J. (1992) Using phylogenetic trees to study speciation and extinction. Evolution 46, 627–640.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hine, E. and Blows, M. (2006) The effective dimensionality of the genetic variance-covariance matrix. Genetics 173, 1135–1144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hooper, D. U. and Vitousek, P. M. (1997) The effects of plant composition and diversity on ecosystem processes. Science 277, 1302–1305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hostert, E. E. (1997) Reinforcement: a new perspective on an old controversy. Evolution 51, 697–702.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hubbs, C. L. (1955) Hybridization between fish species in nature. Systematic Zoology 4, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurd, L. E. and Eisenburg, R. M. (1975) Divergent selection for geotactic response and evolution of reproductive isolation in sympatric and allopatric populations of house flies. American Naturalist 109, 353–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, G. E. (1957) Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology22, 415–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, G. E. (1959) Homage to Santa Rosalia or why are there so many kinds of animals?American Naturalist 93, 145–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiggins, C. D. and Mallet, J. (2001) Bimodal hybrid zones and speciation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15, 250–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiggins, C. D., Naisbit, R. E., Coe, R. L. and Mallet, J. M. (2001) Reproductive isolation caused by colour pattern mimicry. Nature 411, 302–305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kessler, S. (1966) Selection for and against ethological isolation between Drosophila pseudoobscura and Drosophila persimilis. Evolution 20, 634–645.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Killias, G., Alahiotis, S. N. and Pelecanos, M. (1980) A multifactorial genetic investigation of speciation theory using Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 34, 730–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingsolver, J. G., Hoekstra, H. E., Hoekstra, J. M., et al. (2001) The strength of phenotypic selection in natural populations. American Naturalist 157, 245–261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirkpatrick, M. and Lofsvold, D. (1992) Measuring selection and constraint in the evolution of growth. Evolution 46, 954–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkpatrick, M. P. and Ravigné, V. (2002) Speciation by natural and sexual selection: models and experiments. American Naturalist 159, S22–S35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knight, G. R., Robertson, A. and Waddington, C. H. (1956) Selection for sexual isolation within a species. Evolution 10, 14–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koepfer, H. R. (1987) Selection for sexual isolation between geographic forms of Drosophila mojavensis. I. Interactions between the selected forms. Evolution 41, 37–48.Google ScholarPubMed
Koopman, K. F. (1950) Natural selection for reproductive isolation between Drosophila pseudoobscura and Drosophila persimilis. Evolution 4, 135–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lande, R. and Arnold, S. J. (1983) The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37, 1210–1226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lu, G. Q. and Bernatchez, L. (1999) Correlated trophic specialization and genetic divergence in sympatric lake whitefish ecotypes (Coregonus clupeaformis): support for the ecological speciation hypothesis. Evolution 53, 1491–1505.Google ScholarPubMed
Law, J. H. and Crespi, B. J. (2002). The evolution of geographic parthenogenesis in Timema walking-sticks. Molecular Ecology 11, 1471–1489.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacCallum, C. J., Nürnberger, B., Barton, N. H. and Szymura, J. M. (1998) Habitat preference in a Bombina hybrid zone in Croatia. Evolution 52, 227–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maguire, B., Jr. (1967) A partial analysis of the niche. American Naturalist 101, 515–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mallet, J. (1995) A species definition for the modern synthesis. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 10, 294–299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mallet, J. and Barton, N. H. (1989) Strong natural selection in a warning-color hybrid zone. Evolution 43, 421–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mallet, J., Beltran, M., Neukirchen, W. and Linares, M. (2007) Natural hybridization in heliconiine butterflies: the species boundary as a continuum. BioMedCentral Evolutionary Biology 7, 28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Markow, T. A. (1981) Mating preference are not predictive of the direction of evolution in experimental populations of Drosophila. Science 213, 1405–1407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayr, E. (1947) Ecological factors in speciation. Evolution 1, 263–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayr, E. (1963) Animal Species and Evolution. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuigan, K., Chenoweth, S. F. and Blows, M. W. (2005) Phenotypic divergence along lines of genetic variance. American Naturalist 165, 32–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mezey, J. G. and Houle, D. (2005) The dimensionality of genetic variation for wing shape in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 59, 1027–1038.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitter, C., Farrell, B. and Wiegmann, B. (1988) The phylogenetic study of adaptive zones: has phytophagy promoted insect diversification?American Naturalist 132, 107–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mooers, A., Rundle, H. D. and Whitlock, M. C. (1999) The effects of selection and bottlenecks on male mating success in peripheral isolation. American Naturalist 153, 437–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, H. J. (1940) Bearings of the Drosophila work on systematics. In: The New Systematics (ed. Huxley, J. S.), pp. 185–268. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Muller, H. J. (1942) Isolating mechanisms, evolution and temperature. Biological Symposia 6, 71–125.Google Scholar
Nee, S., Mooers, A. O. and Harvey, P. H. (1992) Tempo and mode of evolution revealed from molecular phylogenies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 89, 8322–8326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noor, M. A. F., Grams, K. K., Bertucci, L. A. and Reiland, J. (2001) Chromosomal inversions and the reproductive isolation of species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 98, 12084–12088.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nosil, P. (2004) Reproductive isolation caused by visual predation on migrants between divergent environments. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 271, 1521–1528.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nosil, P. (2007) Divergent host-plant adaptation and reproductive isolation between ecotypes of Timema cristinae walking-sticks. American Naturalist 169, 151–162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nosil, P. and Crespi, B. J. (2004) Does gene flow constrain trait divergence or vice-versa? A test using ecomorphology and sexual isolation in Timema cristinae walking-sticks. Evolution 58, 101–112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nosil, P. and Crespi, B. J. (2006a) Experimental evidence that predation promotes divergence during adaptive radiation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103, 9090–9095.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nosil, P. and Crespi, B. J. (2006b) Ecological divergence promotes the evolution of cryptic reproductive isolation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 273, 991–997.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nosil, P., Crespi, B. J., Gries, R. and Gries, G. (2007) Natural selection and divergence in mate preference during speciation. Genetica 129, 309–327.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nosil, P., Crespi, B. J. and Sandoval, C. P. (2002) Host-plant adaptation drives the parallel evolution of reproductive isolation. Nature 417, 440–443.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nosil, P., Crespi, B. J. and Sandoval, C. P. (2003) Reproductive isolation driven by the combined effects of ecological adaptation and reinforcement. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 270, 1911–1918.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nosil, P., Crespi, B. J. and Sandoval, C. P. (2006a) The evolution of host preferences in allopatric versus parapatric populations of Timema cristinae. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 19, 929–942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nosil, P., Crespi, B. J., Sandoval, C. P. and Kirkpatrick, M. (2006b) Migration and the genetic covariance between habitat preference and performance. American Naturalist 167, E66–E78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nosil, P., Egan, S. P. and Funk, D. J. (2008) Heterogeneous genomic differentiation between walking-stick ecotypes: ‘isolation by adaptation’ and multiple roles for divergent selection. Evolution 62, 316–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nosil, P. and Sandoval, C. P. (2008) Ecological niche dimensionality and the evolutionary diversification of stick insects. Public Library of Science ONE 3, e1907.Google ScholarPubMed
Nosil, P., Vines, T. H. and Funk, D. J. (2005) Perspective: reproductive isolation caused by natural selection against immigrants from divergent habitats. Evolution 59, 705–719.Google ScholarPubMed
Ödeen, A. and Florin, A.-B. (2000) Effective population size may limit the power of laboratory experiments to demonstrate sympatric and parapatric speciation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 267, 601–606.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ogden, R. and Thorpe, R. S. (2002) Molecular evidence for ecological speciation in tropical habitats. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99, 13612–13615.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Orr, H. A. (1995) The population genetics of speciation: the evolution of hybrid incompatibilities. Genetics 139, 1805–1813.Google ScholarPubMed
Orr, H. A. and Turelli, M. (2001) The evolution of postzygotic isolation: accumulating Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities. Evolution 55, 1085–1094.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ortíz-Barrientos, D. and Noor, M. A. F. (2005) Evidence for a one-allele assortative mating locus. Science 310, 1467–1467.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parchman, T. L., Benkman, C. W. and Britch, S. C. (2006) Patterns of genetic variation in the adaptive radiation of New World crossbills (Aves: Loxia). Molecular Ecology 15, 1873–1887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paterniani, E. (1969) Selection for reproductive isolation between two populations of Maize, Zea mays, L. Evolution 23, 534–547.Google Scholar
Pialek, J. and Barton, N. H. (1997) The spread of an advantageous allele across a barrier: The effects of random drift and selection against heterozygotes. Genetics 145, 493–504.Google ScholarPubMed
Pianka, E. (1978) Evolutionary Ecology. 3rd ed. Harper & Row, New York.Google Scholar
Pilot, M., Jedrzejewski, W., Branicki, W., et al. (2006) Ecological factors influence population genetic structure of European grey wolves. Molecular Ecology 15, 4533–4553.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ree, R. H. (2005) Detecting the historical signature of key innovations using stochastic models of character evolution and cladogenesis. Evolution 59, 257–265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reimchen, T. E. (1979) Substratum heterogeneity, crypsis, and colour polymorphism in an intertidal snail. Canadian Journal of Zoology 57, 1070–1085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, W. R. (1985) Disruptive selection on habitat preference and the evolution of reproductive isolation: an exploratory experiment. Evolution 39, 645–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, W. R. and Hostert, E. E. (1993) Laboratory experiments in speciation: what have we learned in 40 years?Evolution 47, 1637–1653.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rice, W. R. and Salt, G. W. (1988) Speciation via disruptive selection on habitat preference: experimental evidence. American Naturalist 131, 911–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, W. R. and Salt, G. W. (1990) The evolution of reproductive isolation as a correlated character under sympatric conditions: experimental evidence. Evolution 44, 1140–1152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richmond, J. Q. and Jockusch, E. L. (2007) Body size evolution simultaneously creates and collapses species boundaries in a clade of scincid lizards. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 274, 1701–1708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rieseberg, L. H. (2001) Chromosomal rearrangements and speciation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16, 351–358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rocha, L. A., Robertson, D. R., Roman, J. and Bowen, B. W. (2005) Ecological speciation in tropical reef fishes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 272, 573–579.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rundle, H. D. (2003) Divergent environments and population bottlenecks fail to generate premating isolation in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Evolution 57, 2557–2565.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rundle, H., Chenoweth, S. F., Doughty, P. and Blows, M. W. (2005) Divergent selection and the evolution of signal traits and mating preferences. PLoS Biology 11, e368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rundle, H. D., Nagel, L., Boughman, J. W. and Schluter, D. (2000) Natural selection and parallel speciation in sympatric sticklebacks. Science 287, 306–308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rundle, H. and Nosil, P. (2005) Ecological speciation. Ecology Letters 8, 336–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rundle, H. D., Vamosi, S. M. and Schluter, D. (2003) Experimental test of predation's effect on divergent selection during character displacement in sticklebacks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100, 14943–14948.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rundle, H. D. and Whitlock, M. (2001) A genetic interpretation of ecologically dependent isolation. Evolution 55, 198–201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sandoval, C. P. (1994a) The effects of relative geographic scales of gene flow and selection on morph frequencies in the walking stick Timema cristinae. Evolution 48, 1866–1879.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sandoval, C. P. (1994b) Differential visual predation on morphs of Timema cristinae (Phasmatodeae: Timemidae) and its consequences for host range. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 52, 341–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandoval, C. P. and Nosil, P. (2005) Counteracting selective regimes and host preference evolution in ecotypes of two species of walking-sticks. Evolution 59, 2405–2413.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Santibanez, S. K. and Waddington, C. H. (1958) The origin of sexual isolation between different lines within a species. Evolution 12, 485–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharloo, W. (1971) Reproductive isolation by disruptive selection: did it occur?American Naturalist 105, 83–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharloo, W., Hoogmoed, M. S. and Kuile, A. T. (1967) Stabilizing selection on a mutant character in Drosophila. I. The phenotypic variance and its components. Genetics 56, 709–726.Google ScholarPubMed
Schluter, D. (1994) Experimental evidence that competition promotes divergence in adaptive radiation. Science 266, 798–800.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schluter, D. (2000) The Ecology of Adaptive Radiation. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Schluter, D. and Nagel, L. M. (1995) Parallel speciation by natural selection. American Naturalist 146, 292–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoener, T. W. (1989) The ecological niche. In: Ecological concepts (ed. Cherrett, J. M.), pp. 79–113. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford.Google Scholar
Seehausen, O., Alphen, J. J. M. and Witte, F. (1997) Cichlid fish diversity threatened by eutrophication that curbs sexual selection. Science 277, 1808–1811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, G. G. (1944) Tempo and Mode in Evolution. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Slowinski, J. B. and Guyer, C. (1989) Testing the stochasticity of patterns of organismal diversity: an improved null model. American Naturalist 134, 907–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soans, B. A., Pimentel, D. and Soans, J. S. (1974) Evolution of reproductive isolation in allopatric and sympatric populations. American Naturalist 108, 117–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spiess, E. B. and Wilke, C. M. (1984) Still another attempt to achieve assortative mating by disruptive selection in Drosophila. Evolution 38, 505–515.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Streelman, J. T. and Danley, P. D. (2003) The stages of vertebrate adaptive radiation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18, 126–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, E. B., Boughman, J. W., Groenenboom, M., et al. (2006) Speciation in reverse: morphological and genetic evidence of the collapse of a three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) species pair. Molecular Ecology 15, 343–355.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thoday, J. M. and Gibson, J. B. (1962) Isolation by disruptive selection. Nature 193: 1164–1166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thoday, J. M. and Gibson, J. B. (1970) The probability of isolation by disruptive selection. American Naturalist 104, 219–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilman, D., Knops, J., Wedlin, D., et al. (1997) The influence of functional diversity and composition on ecosystem processes. Science 277, 1300–1302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turelli, M. (1985) Effects of pleiotropy on predictions concerning mutation-selection balance for polygenic traits. Genetics 111: 165–195.Google ScholarPubMed
Vamosi, S. M. (2005) On the role of enemies in divergence and diversification of prey: a review and synthesis. Canadian Journal of Zoology 83, 894–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vamosi, S. M. and Vamosi, J. C. (2005) Endless tests: guidelines for analyzing non-nested sister-group comparisons. Evolutionary Ecology Research 7, 567–579.Google Scholar
Vandermeer, J. H. (1972) Niche theory. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 3, 107–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijken, F. R. and Scharloo, W. (1979) Divergent selection on locomotor activity in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Tests for reproductive isolation between selected lines. Behavioral Genetics 9, 555–561.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Homrigh, A., Higgie, M., McGuigan, K. and Blows, M. W. (2007) The depletion of genetic variance by sexual selection. Current Biology 17, 528–532.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Via, S. (1999) Reproductive isolation between sympatric races of pea aphids. I. Gene flow restriction and habitat choice. Evolution 53, 1446–1457.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vickery, V. R. (1993) Revision of Timema Scudder (Phasmatoptera: Timematodea) including three new species. Canadian Entomologist 125, 657–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vines, T. H., Köhler, S. C., Thiel, M., et al. (2003) The maintenance of reproductive isolation in a mosaic hybrid zone between the fire-bellied toads Bombina bombina and B. variegata. Evolution 57, 1876–1888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, G. P. (1989) Multivariate mutation-selection balance with constrained pleiotropic effects. Genetics 122: 223–234.Google ScholarPubMed
Wallace, B. (1953) Genetic divergence of isolated populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Genetics 9, 761–764.Google Scholar
Warheit, K. I., Forman, J. D., Losos, J. B. and Miles, D. B. (1999) Morphological diversification and adaptive radiation: a comparison of two diverse lizard clades. Evolution 53, 1226–1234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitlock, M. (1997) Founder effects and peak shifts without genetic drift: adaptive peak shifts occur easily when environments fluctuate slightly. Evolution 51, 1044–1048.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiens, J. J. and Graham, C. H. (2005) Niche conservatism: integrating evolution, ecology, and conservation biology. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 36, 519–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, S. (1932) The roles of mutation, inbreeding, crossbreeding, and selection in evolution. Proceedings of the Sixth International Congress of Genetics 1, 356–366.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×