Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T19:32:05.636Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter Eight - The implications of adaptive prey behaviour for ecological communities

a review of current theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2013

Scott D. Peacor
Affiliation:
Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan State University
Clayton E. Cressler
Affiliation:
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan
Takayuki Ohgushi
Affiliation:
Kyoto University, Japan
Oswald Schmitz
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Robert D. Holt
Affiliation:
University of Florida
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The overarching goal of community ecology is to address broad problems, from predicting the effects of species’ invasion and loss to understanding the processes affecting the diversity, resilience and robustness of ecological systems. Ecological theory addresses these questions through the development of models that examine how species interact within food webs, and how those interactions give rise to the community-level properties we observe in natural systems, such as the relationship between complexity and stability, and the distribution of links across the food web. We argue here that current theory in community ecology is limited in its ability to address these fundamental questions, because it has largely ignored the role of species to modify their traits in response to their environment. This oversight is especially evident from the paucity of theory that considers how the broad problems outlined above are affected by the ubiquitous ability of prey to modify their traits to balance the trade-off between foraging gain and predation risk (Lima and Dill 1990; Lima 1998; Werner and Peacor 2003).

The traditional approach to community ecology is focused largely on linked pairwise interactions between populations, whether through competition, exploitation, or mutualism (May 1973; Pimm 1982; Bender et al. 1984; Yodzis 1988; Schoener 1993). These pairwise interactions are treated as building blocks upon which our understanding of larger ecological communities can be built, with the implicit assumption that pairwise interactions are independent of the ecological context in which they are embedded (Wootton 1994; Abrams 1995; Werner and Peacor 2003). A critical evaluation of this assumption began to emerge in the late 1960s. Vandermeer (1969) introduced the notion of ‘higher-order interactions’ (HOIs) wherein the interaction between two species is modified by other species in the system. While early attempts to test for HOIs were equivocal (Wilbur 1972; Neill 1974; Werner and Peacor 2003), the idea that species’ interactions were not fixed began to gain wider acceptance through the development of foraging theory in the 1970s and 1980s.

Type
Chapter
Information
Trait-Mediated Indirect Interactions
Ecological and Evolutionary Perspectives
, pp. 131 - 160
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrams, P. 1984 Foraging time optimization and interactions in food websAmerican Naturalist 124 80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abrams, P. 1987 Indirect interactions between species that share a predator: varieties on a themeKerfoot, W.Sih, A.Predation: Direct and Indirect Impacts on Aquatic CommunitiesHanover, NHUniversity Press of New England38Google Scholar
Abrams, P. 1991 Life-history and the relationship between food availability and foraging effortEcology 72 1242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abrams, P. 1992 Predators that benefit prey and prey that harm predators: unusual effects of interacting foraging adaptationsAmerican Naturalist 140 573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abrams, P. 1995 Implications of dynamically variable traits for identifying, classifying, and measuring direct and indirect effects in ecological communitiesAmerican Naturalist 146 112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abrams, P. 1999 The adaptive dynamics of consumer choiceAmerican Naturalist 153 83CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abrams, P. 2000 The impact of habitat selection on the spatial heterogeneity of resources in varying environmentsEcology 81 2902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abrams, P. 2001 Modelling the adaptive dynamics of traits involved in inter- and intraspecific interactions: an assessment of three methodsEcology Letters 4 166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abrams, P. 2001 Describing and quantifying interspecific interactions: a commentary on recent approachesOikos 94 209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abrams, P. 2003 Can adaptive evolution or behaviour lead to diversification of traits determining a trade-off between foraging gain and predation risk?Evolutionary Ecology Research 5 653Google Scholar
Abrams, P. 2004 Trait-initiated indirect effects due to changes in consumption rates in simple food websEcology 85 1029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abrams, P. 2007 Habitat choice in predator–prey systems: spatial instability due to interacting adaptive movementsAmerican Naturalist 169 581Google ScholarPubMed
Abrams, P. 2008 Measuring the impact of dynamic antipredator traits on predator–prey-resource interactionsEcology 89 1640CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abrams, P. 2009 Adaptive changes in prey vulnerability shape the response of predator populations to mortalityJournal of Theoretical Biology 261 294CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abrams, P. 2010 Quantitative descriptions of resource choice in ecological modelsPopulation Ecology 52 47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abrams, P. 2010 Implications of flexible foraging for interspecific interactions: lessons from simple modelsFunctional Ecology 24 7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abrams, P.Matsuda, H. 1996 Positive indirect effects between prey species that share predatorsEcology 77 610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abrams, P.Matsuda, H. 1997 Prey adaptation as a cause of predator–prey cyclesEvolution 51 1742CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abrams, P.Matsuda, H. 2005 The effect of adaptive change in the prey on the dynamics of an exploited predator populationCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 62 758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abrams, P.Vos, M. 2003 Adaptation, density dependence and the responses of trophic level abundances to mortalityEvolutionary Ecology Research 5 1113Google Scholar
Abrams, P.Holt, R.Roth, J. 1998 Apparent competition or apparent mutualism? Shared predation when populations cycleEcology 79 201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abrams, P.Matsuda, H.Harada, Y. 1993 Evolutionarily unstable fitness maxima and stable fitness minima of continuous traitsEvolutionary Ecology 7 465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abrams, P.Menge, B.Mittelbach, G.Spiller, D.Yodzis, P. 1996 The role of indirect effects in food websPolis, G.Winemiller, K.Food Webs: Dynamics and StructureNew YorkChapman and Hall371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agrawal, A. 2001 Phenotypic plasticity in the interactions and evolution of speciesScience 294 321CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arditi, R.Michalski, J.Hirzel, A. 2005 Rheagogies: modeling non-trophic effects in food websEcological Complexity 2 249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, R.McGehee, R. 1980 Competitive exclusionAmerican Naturalist 115 151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bascompte, J.Mélian, C. 2005 Simple trophic modules for complex food websEcology 86 2868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckerman, A.Petchey, O.Morin, P. 2010 Adaptive foragers and community ecology: linking individuals to communities and ecosystemsFunctional Ecology 24 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckerman, A.Uriarte, M.Schmitz, O. 1997 Experimental evidence for a behavior-mediated trophic cascade in a terrestrial food chainProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 94 10735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beddington, J. 1975 Mutual interference between parasites or predators and its effect on searching efficiencyJournal of Animal Ecology 44 331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bender, E.Case, T.Gilpin, M. 1984 Perturbation experiments in community ecology: theory and practiceEcology 65 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolker, B.Holyoak, M.Křivan, V.Rowe, L.Schmitz, O. 2003 Connecting theoretical and empirical studies of trait-mediated interactionsEcology 84 1101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brassil, C. 2006 Can environmental variation generate positive indirect effects in a model of shared predation?American Naturalist 167 43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brose, U.Berlow, E.Martinez, N. 2005 Scaling up keystone effects from simple to complex ecological networksEcology Letters 8 1317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charnov, E. 1976 Optimal foraging, marginal value theoremTheoretical Population Biology 9 129CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coulson, T.Catchpole, E.Albon, S. 2001 Age, sex, density, winter weather, and population crashes in Soay sheepScience 292 1528CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coulson, T.Rohani, P.Pascual, M. 2004 Skeletons, noise, and population growth: the end of an old debate?Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19 359CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Creel, S.Christianson, D. 2008 Relationships between direct predation and risk effectsTrends in Ecology and Evolution 23 194CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cressler, C.King, A.Werner, E. 2010 Interactions between behavioral and life-history trade-offs in the evolution of integrated predator-defense plasticityAmerican Naturalist 176 276CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cressman, R.Křivan, V.Garay, J. 2004 Ideal free distributions, evolutionary games, and population dynamics in multiplespecies environmentsAmerican Naturalist 164 473Google ScholarPubMed
Dambacher, J.Ramos-Jiliberto, R. 2007 Understanding and predicting effects of modified interactions through a qualitative analysis of community structureQuarterly Review of Biology 82 227CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeAngelis, D.Goldstein, R.O’Neill, R. 1975 A model for tri-trophic interactionEcology 56 881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fryxell, J.Lundberg, P. 1998 Individual Behavior and Community DynamicsHeidelberg, GermanySpringerCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fussmann, G.Heber, G. 2002 Food web complexity and chaotic population dynamicsEcology Letters 5 394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goudard, A.Loreau, M. 2008 Nontrophic interactions, biodiversity, and ecosystem functioning: an interaction web modelAmerican Naturalist 171 91CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grabowski, J. 2004 Habitat complexity disrupts predator–prey interactions but not the trophic cascade on oyster reefsEcology 85 995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hastings, A.Powell, T. 1991 Chaos in a three-species food-chainEcology 72 896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heithaus, M.Frid, A.Wirsing, A.Worm, B. 2008 Predicting ecological consequences of marine top predator declinesTrends in Ecology and Evolution 23 202CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holland, J. H. 1992 Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial IntelligenceBoston, MAThe MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Holt, R. 1997 Community modulesGange, A.Brown, V.Multitrophic Interactions in Terrestrial EcosystemsCambridgeCambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Holt, R.Barfield, M. 2003 Impacts of temporal variation on apparent competition and coexistence in open ecosystemsOikos 101 49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, R.Grover, J.Tilman, D. 1994 Simple rules for interspecific dominance in systems with exploitative and apparent competitionAmerican Naturalist 144 741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ives, A.Dobson, A. 1987 Antipredator behavior and the population-dynamics of simple predator–prey systemsAmerican Naturalist 130 431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimbrell, T.Holt, R. 2004 On the interplay of predator switching and prey evasion in determining the stability of predator–prey dynamicsIsrael Journal of Zoology 50 187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, A.Schaffer, W. 2001 The geometry of a population cycle: a mechanistic model of snowshoe hare demographyEcology 82 814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kondoh, M. 2003 Foraging adaptation and the relationship between food web complexity and stabilityScience 299 1388CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kondoh, M. 2006 Does foraging adaptation create the positive complexity-stability relationship in realistic food-web structure?Journal of Theoretical Biology 238 646CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kondoh, M. 2007 Anti-predator defence and the complexity-stability relationship of food websProceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 274 1617CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kondoh, M. 2008 Building trophic modules into a persistent food webProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105 16631CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Křivan, V. 1997 Dynamic ideal free distribution: effects of optimal patch choice on predator–prey dynamicsAmerican Naturalist 149 164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Křivan, V. 2007 The Lotka-Volterra predator–prey model with foraging-predation risk trade-offsAmerican Naturalist 170 771Google ScholarPubMed
Křivan, V.Schmitz, O. 2004 Trait and density mediated indirect interactions in simple food websOikos 107 239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Křivan, V.Sirot, E. 2004 Do short-term behavioural responses of consumers in tri-trophic food chains persist at the population time-scale?Evolutionary Ecology Research 6 1063Google Scholar
Lima, S. 1998 Stress and decision making under the risk of predation: recent developments from behavioral, reproductive, and ecological perspectivesStress and Behavior 27 215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lima, S. 2002 Putting predators back into behavioral predator–prey interactionsTrends in Ecology and Evolution 17 70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lima, S.Bednekoff, P. 1999 Temporal variation in danger drives antipredator behavior: the predation risk allocation hypothesisAmerican Naturalist 153 649CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lima, S.Dill, L. 1990 Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectusCanadian Journal of Zoology 68 619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luttbeg, B.Schmitz, O. 2000 Predator and prey models with flexible individual behavior and imperfect informationAmerican Naturalist 155 669CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luttbeg, B.Sih, A. 2004 Predator and prey habitat selection games: the effects of how prey balance foraging and predation riskIsrael Journal of Zoology 50 233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, B.Abrams, P.Brassil, C. 2003 Dynamic versus instantaneous models of diet choiceAmerican Naturalist 162 668CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacArthur, R.Pianka, E. 1966 On optimal use of a patchy environmentAmerican Naturalist 100 603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCann, K.Rooney, N. 2009 The more food webs change, the more they stay the samePhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B 364 1789CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCann, K.Hastings, A.Huxel, G. 1998 Weak trophic interactions and the balance of natureNature 395 794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCoy, M.Bolker, B. 2008 Trait-mediated interactions: influence of prey size, density and experienceJournal of Animal Ecology 77 478CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mangel, M.Clark, C. W. 1989 Dynamic Modeling in Behavioral EcologyPrinceton, NJPrinceton University PressGoogle Scholar
Matsuda, H.Abrams, P.Hori, H. 1993 The effect of adaptive antipredator behavior on exploitative competition and mutualism between predatorsOikos 68 549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsuda, H.Hori, M.Abrams, P. 1994 Effects of predator-specific defense on community complexityEvolutionary Ecology 8 628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsuda, H.Hori, M.Abrams, P. 1996 Effects of predator-specific defence on biodiversity and community complexity in two-trophic-level communitiesEvolutionary Ecology 10 13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, R. M. 1973 Stability and Complexity in Model EcosystemsPrinceton, NJPrinceton University PressGoogle ScholarPubMed
McPeek, M.Peckarsky, B. 1998 Life histories and the strengths of species interactions: combining mortality, growth, and fecundity effectsEcology 79 867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, T.Kerfoot, W. 1987 Redefining indirect effectsKerfoot, W.Sih, A.Predation: Direct and Indirect Impacts on Aquatic CommunitiesHanover, NHUniversity Press of New England33Google Scholar
Miner, B.Sultan, S.Morgan, S.Padilla, D.Relyea, R. 2005 Ecological consequences of phenotypic plasticityTrends in Ecology and Evolution 20 685CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mougi, A.Nishimura, K. 2008 The paradox of enrichment in an adaptive worldProceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 275 2563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murdoch, W. 1969 Switching in general predators: experiments on predator specificity and stability of prey populationsEcological Monographs 39 335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neill, W. 1974 Community matrix and interdependence of competition coefficientsAmerican Naturalist 108 399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neutel, A.Heesterbeek, J.Ruiter, P. 2002 Stability in real food webs: weak links in long loopsScience 296 1120CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ohgushi, T. 2005 Indirect interaction webs: herbivore-induced effects through trait change in plantsAnnual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 36 81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oksanen, L.Fretwell, S.Arruda, J.Niemela, P. 1981 Exploitation ecosystems in gradients of primary productivityAmerican Naturalist 118 240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ovadia, O.Schmitz, O. 2004 Scaling from individuals to food webs: the role of size-dependent responses of prey to predation riskIsrael Journal of Zoology 50 273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pangle, K.Peacor, S.Johannsson, O. 2007 Large nonlethal effects of an invasive invertebrate predator on zooplankton population growth rateEcology 88 402CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pawar, S. 2009 Community assembly, stability and signatures of dynamical constraints on food web structureJournal of Theoretical Biology 259 601CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peacor, S. 2002 Positive effect of predators on prey growth rate through induced modifications of prey behaviourEcology Letters 5 77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peacor, S.Werner, E. 1997 Trait-mediated indirect interactions in a simple aquatic food webEcology 78 1146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peacor, S.Werner, E. 2000 Predator effects on an assemblage of consumers through induced changes in consumer foraging behaviorEcology 81 1998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peacor, S.Werner, E. 2004 How dependent are species-pair interaction strengths on other species in the food web?Ecology 85 2754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peacor, S.Werner, E. 2004 Context dependence of nonlethal effects of a predator on prey growthIsrael Journal of Zoology 50 139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peacor, S.Werner, E. 2008 Nonconsumptive effects of predators and trait-mediated indirect interactionsEncyclopedia of Life SciencesWiley Online LibraryGoogle Scholar
Peacor, S.Allesina, S.Riolo, R.Hunter, T. 2007 A new computational system, DOVE (Digital Organisms in a Virtual Ecosystem), to study phenotypic plasticity and its effects in food websEcological Modelling 205 13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peacor, S.Allesina, S.Riolo, R.Pascual, M. 2006 Phenotypic plasticity opposes species invasions by altering fitness surfacePLoS Biology 4 2112CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peckarsky, B.Abrams, P.Bolnick, D. 2008 Revisiting the classics: considering nonconsumptive effects in textbook examples of predator–prey interactionsEcology 89 2416CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pecor, K.Hazlett, B. 2003 Frequency of encounter with risk and the trade-off between pursuit and antipredator behaviors in crayfish: a test of the risk allocation hypothesisEthology 109 97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pimm, S. L. 1982 Food WebsChicago, ILUniversity of Chicago PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramos-Jiliberto, R.Mena-Lorca, J.Flores, J.Morales-Alvarez, W. 2008 Role of inducible defenses in the stability of a tri-trophic systemEcological Complexity 5 183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Relyea, R. 2007 Getting out alive: how predators affect the decision to metamorphoseOecologia 152 389CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rinaldi, S.Gragnani, A.Monte, S. 2004 Remarks on antipredator behavior and food chain dynamicsTheoretical Population Biology 66 277CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rohani, P.Keeling, M.Grenfell, B. 2002 The interplay between determinism and stochasticity in childhood diseasesAmerican Naturalist 159 469CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenzweig, M. L. 1971 Paradox of enrichment: destabilization of exploitation ecosystems in ecological timeScience 171 385CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rowe, L.Ludwig, D. 1991 Size and timing of metamorphosis in complex life-cycles: time constraints and variationEcology 72 413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitz, O. 2000 Combining field experiments and individual-based modeling to identify the dynamically relevant organizational scale in a field systemOikos 89 471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitz, O.Grabowski, J.Peckarsky, B. 2008 From individuals to ecosystem function: toward an integration of evolutionary and ecosystem ecologyEcology 89 2436CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmitz, O.Křivan, V.Ovadia, O. 2004 Trophic cascades: the primacy of trait-mediated indirect interactionsEcology Letters 7 153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoener, T. 1971 Theory of feeding strategiesAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics 2 369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoener, T. 1993 On the relative importance of direct versus indirect effects in ecological communitiesKawanabe, H.Cohen, J.Iwasaki, K.Mutualisms and Community OrganizationOxfordOxford University Press365Google Scholar
Schwinning, S.Rosenzweig, M. 1990 Periodic oscillations in an ideal-free predator–prey distributionOikos 59 85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephens, D.Krebs, J. 1986 Foraging TheoryPrinceton, NJPrinceton University PressGoogle Scholar
Stouffer, D.Camacho, J.Jiang, W.Amaral, L. 2007 Evidence for the existence of a robust pattern of prey selection in food websProceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 274 1931CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strand, E.Huse, G.Giske, J. 2002 Artificial evolution of life history and behaviorAmerican Naturalist 159 624CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sundell, J.Dudek, D.Klemme, I. 2004 Variation in predation risk and vole feeding behaviour: a field test of the risk allocation hypothesisOecologia 139 157CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Takimoto, G. 2003 Adaptive plasticity in ontogenetic niche shifts stabilizes consumer–resource dynamicsAmerican Naturalist 162 93CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tollrian, R.Harvell, C. D. 1998 The Ecology and Evolution of Inducible DefensesPrinceton, NJPrinceton University PressGoogle Scholar
Turner, A. 2004 Non-lethal effects of predators on prey growth rates depend on prey density and nutrient additionsOikos 104 561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trussell, G.Ewanchuk, P.Matassa, C. 2006 Habitat effects on the relative importance of trait- and density-mediated indirect interactionsEcology Letters 9 1245CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trussell, G.Ewanchuk, P.Matassa, C. 2006 The fear of being eaten reduces energy transfer in a simple food chainEcology 87 2979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turchin, P. 2000 Living on the edge of chaos: population dynamics of Fennoscandian volesEcology 81 3099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uchida, S.Drossel, B. 2007 Relation between complexity and stability in food webs with adaptive behaviorJournal of Theoretical Biology 247 713CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Uchida, S.Drossel, B.Brose, U. 2007 The structure of food webs with adaptive behaviourEcological Modelling 206 263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buskirk, J.Müller, C.Portmann, A.Surbeck, M. 2002 A test of the risk allocation hypothesis: tadpole responses to temporal change in predation riskBehavioral Ecology 13 526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandermeer, J. 1969 Competitive structure of communities: an experimental approach with protozoaEcology 50 362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verschoor, A.Vos, M.van der Stap, I. 2004 Inducible defences prevent strong population fluctuations in bi- and tri-trophic food chainsEcology Letters 7 1143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vos, M.Kooi, B.DeAngelis, D.Mooij, W. 2004 Inducible defences and the paradox of enrichmentOikos 105 471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vos, M.Verschoor, A.Kooi, B.Wackers, F.DeAngelis, D.Mooij, W. 2004 Inducible defenses and trophic structureEcology 85 2783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werner, E. 2001 Ecological experiment and a research program in community ecologyResetarits, W.Bernardo, J.Experimental Ecology: Issues and PerspectivesOxfordOxford University Press3Google Scholar
Werner, E.Anholt, B. 1993 Ecological consequences of the trade-off between growth and mortality rates mediated by foraging activityAmerican Naturalist 142 242CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Werner, E.Peacor, S. 2003 A review of trait-mediated indirect interactions in ecological communitiesEcology 84 1083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werner, E.Peacor, S. 2006 Lethal and nonlethal predator effects on an herbivore guild mediated by system productivityEcology 87 347CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Werner, E.Skelly, D.Relyea, R.Yurewicz, K. 2007 Amphibian species richness across environmental gradientsOikos 116 1697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werner, E.Yurewicz, K.Skelly, D.Relyea, R. 2007 Turnover in an amphibian metacommunity: the role of local and regional factorsOikos 116 1713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilbur, H. 1972 Competition, predation, and structure of communityEcology 53 3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wootton, J. 1994 The nature and consequences of indirect effects in ecological communitiesAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics 25 443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamauchi, A.Yamamura, N. 2005 Effects of defense evolution and diet choice on population dynamics in a one-predator-two-prey systemEcology 86 2513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yodzis, P. 1988 The indeterminacy of ecological interactions as perceived through perturbation experimentsEcology 69 508CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×