Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. Advances in Archaeological Practice
  4. Journal information
  5. Peer review information
  6. Review process
Journal Home
Review process

This journal uses a double-anonymised model of peer review. Neither author nor reviewers know the identity of each other. 

Editors' Decisions

The wording of editor’s decisions used by Advances in Archaeological Practice is different than that traditionally used by other journals.  Accept, with some level of review is equivalent to Accept with Minor Revisions. Revise and Resubmit for limited review is equivalent to Accept with Major Revisions, Revise and Resubmit for Full Review is similar to Revise and Resubmit, and Reject is Reject.