Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T19:39:55.713Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Question and Answer Session

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2015

Get access

Summary

Question

The United States needs to borrow from abroad as long as its budget deficit persists. But then it doesn't like having current account deficits, particularly trade deficits which are the counterpart of the surpluses that Japan, the NICs, and Germany are enjoying because these are the real counterpart of the borrowing. So, at the same time the United States is pressurizing these countries which have surpluses with it to cut down their surpluses. At the same time it wants to borrow money from them. Can you tell us how to achieve this impossible trick?

Professor Kindleberger

No, I can't square the circle either. But I quite agree that the pressure of the United States to try to force countries to accept more U.S. exports should be based on microeconomics, not macroeconomics. I have always objected to mixing the two up. In the world of second best, you may have to use microeconomic devices to shape macroeconomics and I completely agree that in an absorption model of the balance of payments, it is the lack of savings in the United States which is producing the deficit. Some blame it exclusively on the federal budget but the decline in savings on the part of households is also to blame. We have had a spending mania for some years, personal savings have gone down from something like 7 per cent national income to 2.5 of disposal income. This is not just an odd happenstance but goes deeper. People in the United States want to get rid of the budget deficit and the trade deficit, but they are not willing to do it by willing the means. Look what happened to Mondale in the election of 1984 when he proposed a tax increase. And notice how every candidate this year is staying away from talking about taxes. My tax accountant tells me that there certainly is going to be a tax increase by July, one he thinks it is inevitable. But I would think that in an election year it is inevitable that you won't.

Type
Chapter
Information
The 1930s and the 1980s
Parallels and Differences
, pp. 15 - 24
Publisher: ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute
Print publication year: 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×