Adams, M. 2003. Slayer Slang: A ‘Buffy the Vampire Slayer’ Lexicon. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Aijmer, K. 2015. ‘Analysing discourse markers in spoken corpora: actually as a case study’. In Baker, P. and McEnery, T. (eds) Corpora and Discourse: Integrating Discourse and Corpora. London: Palgrave, pp. 88–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alexander, M. 2010. The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar

Algeo, J. 2006. British or American English? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allwood, M. S. 1964. American and British: A Handbook of American-British Language Differences. Mullsjö, Sweden: Anglo-American Center.Google Scholar

Altheide, D. 2002. Creating Fear: News and the Construction of Crisis. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Aston, G. and Burnard, L. 1998. The BNC Handbook: Exploring the British National Corpus with SARA. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Baker, P. 2005. Public Discourses of Gay Men. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Baker, P. 2009. ‘The BE06 corpus of British English and recent language change’. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14(3): 312–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, P. 2010a. Sociolinguistics and Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Baker, P. 2010b. ‘Will Ms ever be as frequent as Mr? A corpus-based comparison of gendered terms across four diachronic corpora of British English’. Gender and Language 4(1): 125–129.Google Scholar

Baker, P. 2011. ‘Times may change but we'll always have money: a corpus driven examination of vocabulary change in four diachronic corpora’. Journal of English Linguistics 39: 65–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, P. 2012. ‘From gay language to normative discourse: a diachronic corpus analysis of Lavender Linguistics conference abstracts 1994–201’. Journal of Language and Sexuality 2(2): 179–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, P. 2014. Using Corpora to Analyse Gender. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C. and McEnery, T. 2013. Discourse Analysis and Media Attitudes: The Representation of Islam in the British Press. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, P. and McEnery, T. (eds). 2015. Corpora and Discourse: Integrating Discourse and Corpora. London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baroni, M., Bernardini, S., Ferraresi, A. and Zanchetta, E. 2009. ‘The WaCky Wide Web: a collection of very large linguistically processed web-crawled corpora’. Language Resources and Evaluation 43(3): 209–226.Google Scholar

Biber, D. 1988. Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biber, D. 1993. ‘Representativeness in corpus design’. Literary and Linguistic Computing 8(4): 243–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biber, D., Conrad, S. and Cortes, V. 2004. ‘If you look at…: lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks’. Applied Linguistics 25(3): 371–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. and Finegan, E. 1999. The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Billig, M. 2008. ‘The language of critical discourse analysis: the case of nominalization’. Discourse and Society 19(6): 783–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blum, J., Cameron, R. and Barnes, T. G. 1970. The European World: A History. 2nd ed. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar

Brezina, V., McEnery, T. and Wattam, S. 2015. ‘Collocations in context: a new perspective on collocation networks’. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 20(2): 139–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bolter, J. D. 1991. ‘Beyond word-processing – the computer as a new writing space’. Language and Communication 9(2–3): 129–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butler, C. 1985. Statistics in Linguistics. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar

Cananau, I. 2015. Constituting Americanness: A History of the Concept and Its Representations in Antebellum American Literature. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carter, R., McCarthy, M., Mark, G. and O'Keefe, A. 2011. English Grammar Today. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Chafe, W. 1982. ‘Integration and involvement in speaking, writing and oral literature’. In Tannen, D. (ed.) Spoken and Written Language: Exploring Orality and Literacy. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 35–53.Google Scholar

Collier, L. 2014. ‘Incarceration nation’. Monitor on Psychology 45(9): 56.Google Scholar

Crystal, B., Russ, A. and McLachlan, E. 2010. Sorry I'm British! An Insider's Guide to Britain from A to Z. Oxford: Oneworld.Google Scholar

Crystal, D. 2003. English as a Global Language. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Culpeper, J. and Hardaker, C. 2015. ‘Pragmatics’. In Baker, P. and Egbert, J. (eds) Triangulating Methodological Approaches in Corpus Linguistic Research. London: Routledge, pp. 124–137.Google Scholar

Davies, M. 2012. ‘Expanding horizons in historical linguistics with the 400-million word Corpus of Historical American English’. Corpora 7(2): 121–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Denham, K. and Lobeck, A. 2009. Linguistics for Everyone: An Introduction. Boston: Wadsworth.Google Scholar

Dunning, T. 1993. ‘Accurate methods for the statistics of surprise and coincidence’. Computational Linguistics 19(1): 61–74.Google Scholar

Eckert, P. 2003. ‘Language and adolescent peer groups’. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 22(1): 112–118.Google Scholar

Engstrom, E. J. 2013. Partisan Gerrymandering and the Construction of American Democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Equality and Human Rights Commission. 2010. How Fair Is Britain? The First Triennial Review. Executive Summary. www.equalityhumanrights.com/about-us/our-work/key-projects/how-fair-britain.Google Scholar

Fabricius, A. 2006. ‘The “vivid sociolinguistic profiling” of received pronunciation: responses to a gendered dialect-in-discourse’. Journal of Sociolinguistics 10: 111–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fairclough, N. 1989. Language and Power. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Fairclough, N. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Ferris, S. P. 2002. ‘Writing electronically: the effects of computers on traditional writing’. The Journal of Electronic Publishing 8(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.3998/3336451.0008.104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finegan, E. 2004. American English and its distinctiveness. In Finegan, E. and Rickford, J. R. (eds) Language in the USA. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 18–38.Google Scholar

Fischhoff, B. and Beyth, R. 1975. ‘“I knew it would happen”: remembered probabilities of once-future things’. Organizational Behaviour and Human Performance 13: 1–16.Google Scholar

Fox, K. 2004. Watching the English. London: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar

Francis, W. N. and Kučera, H. 1979. Manual of Information to Accompany a Standard Sample of Present-Day Edited American English, for Use with Digital Computers. Rev. and augmented ed. Providence, RI: Department of Linguistics, Brown University.Google Scholar

Frank, R. H. and Bernanke, B. S. 2007. Principles of Microeconomics. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.Google Scholar

Gabrielatos, C. and Marchi, A. 2012. ‘Keyness: appropriate metrics and practical issues’. Paper given at CADS International Conference, 13–14 September, University of Bologna, Italy.Google Scholar

Galanter, M. 1983. ‘Reading the landscape of disputes: what we know and don't know (and think we know) about our allegedly contentious and litigious society’. UCLA Law Review 31(1): 4–71.Google Scholar

Garside, R. 1996. ‘The robust tagging of unrestricted text: the BNC experience’. In Thomas, J. and Short, M. (eds) Using Corpora for Language Research: Studies in the Honour of Geoffrey Leech. London: Longman, pp. 167–180.Google Scholar

Giddens, A. and Pierson, C. 1998. Making Sense of Modernity: Conversations with Anthony Giddens. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Gilovich, T., Vallone, R. and Tversky, A. 1985. ‘The hot hand in basketball: on the misperception of random sequences’. Cognitive Psychology 17: 295–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodman, S. 1996. ‘Market forces speak English’. In S. Goodman, and D. Graddol, (eds) Redesigning English: New Texts, New Identities. London: Open University/Routledge, pp. 141–163.Google Scholar

Graff, G. and Birkenstein, C. 2014. ‘They Say/I Say’: The Moves That Matter in Academic Writing. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Hall, K. and Diehm, J. 2013. ‘One disturbing reason for our exploding prison population’. Huffington Post. www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/19/private-prisons_n_3955686.html.Google Scholar

Harrington, J., Palethorpe, S. and Watson, C. I. 2000. ‘Does the Queen speak the Queen's English?’ Nature 408: 927–928.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hebblethwaite, C. 2012. ‘Britishisms and the Britishisation of American English’. BBC News Website. www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-19670686.Google Scholar

Hofland, K. and Johansson, S. 1982. Word Frequencies in British and American English. Bergen, Norway: The Norwegian Computing Centre for the Humanities.Google Scholar

Holmes, J. and Sigley, R. 2001. ‘What's a word like girl doing in a place like this?’ In Smith, A. and Peters, P. (eds) New Frontiers of Corpus Linguistics. Amsterdam: Rodopi, pp. 247–263.Google Scholar

Hopper, P. J. and Traugott, E. C. 2003. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Howard, P. 1984. The State of the Language – English Observed. London: Hamish Hamilton.Google Scholar

Jakubíček, M., Kilgarriff, A., Kovář, V., Rychlý, P. and Suchomel, V. 2013. ‘The TenTen corpus family’. Paper given at 7th International Corpus Linguistics Conference, July, Lancaster University.Google Scholar

Jenkins, J. 2003. World English: A Resource Book for Students. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Jespersen, O. 1909. A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. Vol. 1. Heidelberg: Carl Winter's Universitätsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar

Jewkes, Y. 2015. Media and Crime. 3rd ed. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Johnston, R. J. 2001. The Operation of the UK Electoral System since 1945. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

Juola, P. 2012. ‘Using the Google Ngram corpus to measure dialectical and cultural differences’. Paper given at the Chicago Colloquium on Digital Humanities and Computer Science, 19 November, University of Chicago.Google Scholar

Kanouse, D. E. and Hanson, L. 1972. ‘Negativity in evaluations’. In Jones, E. E., Kanouse, D. E., Valins, S., Kelley, H. H., Nisbett, R. E. and Weiner, B. (eds) Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press, pp. 47–62.Google Scholar

Kaufman, W. and Macpherson, H. S. (eds). 2004. Britain and the Americas: Culture, Politics and History. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-Clio.Google Scholar

Kennedy, G. 1998. An Introduction to Corpus Linguistics. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Kennedy, R. 2002. Nigger: The Strange Career of a Troublesome Word. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar

Kilgarriff, A. 1996a. ‘Which words are particularly characteristic of a text? A survey of statistical approaches’. In Evett, L. J. and Rose, T. G. (eds) Language Engineering for Document Analysis and Recognition (LEDAR), AISB96 Workshop Proceedings. Brighton, UK: Faculty of Engineering and Computing, Nottingham Trent University, pp. 33–40.Google Scholar

Kilgarriff, A. 1996b. ‘Why chi-square doesn't work, and an improved LOB-Brown comparison’. Paper given at ALLC-ACH Conference, June, Bergen, Norway.Google Scholar

Kilgarriff, A. 1997. ‘Using word frequency lists to measure corpus homogeneity and similarity between corpora’. In Proceedings 5th ACL SIGDAT Workshop on Very Large Corpora. Beijing. pp. 231–245.Google Scholar

Kilgarriff, A., Baisa, V., Bušta, J., Jakubíček, M., Kovář, V., Michelfeit, J., Rychlý, P. and Suchomel, V. 2014. ‘The Sketch Engine: ten years on’. Lexicography 1(1): 7–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirk, R. 2005. America's British Culture. Edison NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar

Kjellmer, G. 1986. ‘“The lesser man”: observations on the role of women in modern English writings’. In Arts, J. and Meijs, W. (eds) Corpus Linguistics II. Amsterdam: Rodopi, pp. 163–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laxer, J. 2001. Discovering America: Travels in the Land of Guns, God and Corporate Gurus. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar

Leech, G. 1966. English in Advertising. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Leech, G. 2004. ‘Recent grammatical change in English: data, description, theory’. In K. Aijmer and B. Altenberg (eds) Proceedings of the 2002 ICAME Conference, Gothenburg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leech, G. and Fallon, R. 1992. ‘Computer corpora – what do they tell us about culture?’ ICAME Journal 16: 29–50.Google Scholar

Leech, G., Hundt, M., Mair, C. and Smith, N. 2009. Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Leech, G. and Smith, N. 2005. ‘Extending the possibilities of corpus-based research on English in the twentieth century: a prequel to LOB and FLOB’. ICAME Journal 29: 83–98.Google Scholar

Leech, G. and Smith, N. 2006. ‘Recent grammatical change in written English 1961–1992: some preliminary findings of a comparison of American with British English’. In Renouf, A. and Kehoe, A. (eds) The Changing Face of Corpus Linguistics. Amsterdam: Rodopi, pp. 185–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lieberman, J. K. 1983. The Litigious Society. Reno, NV: Sierra Nevada Books.Google Scholar

Lovejoy, J. 1995. ‘Prepositions in British and American English – a computer-aided corpus study’. Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik 20: 55–74.Google Scholar

Macaulay, K. S. 1995. ‘The adverbs of authority’. English Worldwide 16(1): 37–60.Google Scholar

Mair, C. 1997. ‘Parallel corpora: A real-time approach to language change in progress’. In Ljung, M. (ed.) Corpus-Based Studies in English: Papers from the Seventeenth International Conference on English-Language Research Based on Computerized Corpora (ICAME 17). Amsterdam: Rodopi, pp. 195–209.Google Scholar

Mair, C. 2002. ‘Three changing patterns of verb complementation in Late Modern English: A real-time study based on matching text corpora’. English Language and Linguistics 6(1): 105–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marchi, A. 2014. A Corpus-Assisted Discourse Study of the Guardian's view on Journalism. Unpublished PhD diss., Lancaster University.Google Scholar

Marshall, S. 2004. Difference and Discrimination in Psychotherapy and Counselling. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McEnery, T. 2006. Swearing in English. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

McEnery, T. and Baker, H. 2016. Corpus Linguistics and the Humanities. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

McEnery, T. and Hardie, A. 2012. Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

McEnery, T. and Xiao, Z. 2005. ‘Help or help to: what do corpora have to say?’ English Studies 86(2): 161–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meyer, M. 1995. ‘Einzelaspekt: do as pro-form’. In Ahrens, R., Bald, W.-D. and Hullen, W. (eds) Handbuch Englisch als Fremdsprache. Berlin: Erich Schmidt, pp. 139–142.Google Scholar

Mikes, G. 1984. How to Be a Brit. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Montagu, A. 1967. The Anatomy of Swearing. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Murdock, B. 1962. ‘Serial position effect of free recall’. Journal of Experimental Psychology 64(2): 482–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Myhill, J. 1995. ‘Change and continuity in the functions of the American English modals’. Linguistics. An Interdisciplinary Journal of the Language Sciences 33: 157–211.Google Scholar

Naylor, L. L. 1998. American Culture: Myth and Reality of a Culture of Diversity. Westport, CT: Bergin and Garvey.Google Scholar

Oakes, M. 2003. ‘Contrasts between US and British English in the 1990s’. In Oleksy, E. H. and Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, B. (eds) Research and Scholarship in Integration Processes. Lódź: Lódź University Press, pp. 213–222.Google Scholar

Oakes, M. 2009. ‘Corpus linguistics and language variation’. In Baker, P. (ed.) Contemporary Approaches to Corpus Linguistics. London: Continuum, pp. 159–183.Google Scholar

Orwell, G. 1946. ‘Politics and the English language’. Horizon 13: 252–265.Google Scholar

Partington, A. 1992. The Oxford Dictionary of Quotations. London: BCA.Google Scholar

Partridge, E. 1986. A Dictionary of Catch Phrases: British and American, from the Sixteenth Century to the Present Day. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Peters, P. 2004. The Cambridge Guide to English Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Potts, A. and Baker, P. 2012. ‘Does semantic tagging identify cultural change in British and American English?’ International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 17(3): 295–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rayson, P. 2008. ‘From key words to key semantic domains’. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 13(4): 519–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sacco, V. F. 1995. ‘Media constructions of crime’. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences 539: 141–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Salomon, D. 2005. Coding for Data and Computer Communications. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Scragg, D. G. 1974. A History of English Spelling. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

Sigley, R. and Holmes, J. 2002. ‘Looking at girls in corpora of English’. Journal of English Linguistics 30(2): 138–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, N. 2002. ‘Ever moving on? The progressive in recent British English’. In Peters, P., Collins, P. and Smith, A. (eds) New Frontiers of Corpus Research. Amsterdam: Rodopi, pp. 317–330.Google Scholar

Smith, N. 2003. ‘Changes in the modals and semi-modals of strong obligation and epistemic necessity in recent British English’. In Facchinetti, R., Krug, M. and Palmer, F. (eds) Modality in Contemporary English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 241–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stewart, E. C. and Bennett, M. J. 1991. American Cultural Patterns: A Cross-Cultural Perspective. Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.Google Scholar

Thompson, J. and Smeeding, T. 2012. ‘Inequality in the Great Recession – the case of the United States’. In Jenkins, S. P., Brandolini, A., Micklewright, J. and Nolan, B. (eds) Income Inequality and the Great Recession. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 202–233.Google Scholar

Tieken-Boon van Ostade, I. M. 2009. An Introduction to Late Modern English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tognini-Bonelli, E. 2001. Corpus Linguistics at Work. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Torgersen, E., Kerswill, P. and Fox, S. 2006. ‘Ethnicity as a source of changes in the London vowel system’. In Hinskens, F. (ed.) Language Variation – European Perspectives. Selected Papers from the Third International Conference on Language Variation in Europe. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 249–263.Google Scholar

Torrey, E. F. 1986. Witchdoctors and Psychiatrists: The Common Roots of Psychotherapy and Its Future. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Tottie, G. 2002. An Introduction to American English. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Truss, L. 2003. Eats, Shoots and Leaves: The Zero Tolerance Approach to Punctuation. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar

UCREL. 1996. A Post-editors guide to CLAWS7 tagging. Lancaster University. www.natcorp.ox.ac.uk/docs/claws7.html.Google Scholar

Van Devort, T. R. 2000. American Law and the Legal System: Equal Justice under the Law. Albany, NY: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar

Virpioja, S., Smit, P., Gronroos, S.-A. and Kurimo, M. 2013. Morfessor 2.0: Python Implementation and Extensions for Morfessor Baseline. Helsinki: Aalto University Publication Series.Google Scholar

Walmsley, R. 2013. World Prison Population List. 10th ed. London: International Centre for Prison Studies.Google Scholar

Warner, M. (ed.). 1993. Fear of a Queer Planet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Wason, P. C. 1968. ‘Reasoning about a rule’. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 20: 273–281.Google Scholar

West, H. C. 2010. Prison Inmates at Midyear 2009 – Statistical Tables. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.Google Scholar

Wulff, S., Stefanowitsch, A. and Gries, S. T. 2007. ‘Brutal Brits and persuasive Americans: variety-specific meaning construction in the into-causative’. In Radden, G., Köpcke, K. M., Berg, T. and Siemund, P. (eds) Aspects of Meaning Construction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 265–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yates, S. 1996. ‘English in cyberspace’. In Goodman, S. and Graddol, D. (eds) Redesigning English: New Texts, New Identities. London: Open University/Routledge, pp. 106–137.Google Scholar