Ancient Wisdom in the Age of the New Science Histories of Philosophy in England, <I>c</I>. 1640–1700
Book contents
- Ancient Wisdom in the Age of the New Science
- Ideas in Context
- Ancient Wisdom in the Age of the New Science
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Book part
- Glossary
- Notes on the text
- 1 Introduction: histories of philosophy between ‘Renaissance’ and ‘Enlightenment’
- 2 Ancient wisdom I. The wisdom of the east: Zoroaster, astronomy, and the Chaldeans, from Thomas Stanley to Thomas Hyde
- 3 Ancient wisdom II: Moses the Egyptian?
- 4 Histories of natural philosophy I. Histories of method
- 5 Histories of natural philosophy II. Histories of doctrine: matter theory and animating principles
- 6 Philosophy in the early church
- 7 Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- Ideas in Context
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 October 2015
Book contents
- Ancient Wisdom in the Age of the New Science
- Ideas in Context
- Ancient Wisdom in the Age of the New Science
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Book part
- Glossary
- Notes on the text
- 1 Introduction: histories of philosophy between ‘Renaissance’ and ‘Enlightenment’
- 2 Ancient wisdom I. The wisdom of the east: Zoroaster, astronomy, and the Chaldeans, from Thomas Stanley to Thomas Hyde
- 3 Ancient wisdom II: Moses the Egyptian?
- 4 Histories of natural philosophy I. Histories of method
- 5 Histories of natural philosophy II. Histories of doctrine: matter theory and animating principles
- 6 Philosophy in the early church
- 7 Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- Ideas in Context
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Ancient Wisdom in the Age of the New ScienceHistories of Philosophy in England, <I>c</I>. 1640–1700, pp. 549 - 646Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015
References
Primary Sources
Secondary Sources
de Acosta, José, The natural and morall histories of the East and West Indies (London, 1604).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acta eruditorum (1686).Google Scholar
Acta eruditorum quae Lipsiae publicantur supplementa, 2 (1696).Google Scholar
Ainsworth, Henry, Annotations upon the first books of Moses (Amsterdam, 1621 [1st edn=1616]).Google Scholar
Aphrodisiensis, Alexander, Alexander Aphrodisias: enarratio de anima ex Aristotelis institutione. Neudruck der 1. Ausgabe Brescia 1495, ed. Kessler, E. (Stuttgart, 2008).Google Scholar
Allatius, Leo, ed., Socratis, Antisthenis, et aliorum Socraticorum epistolae (Paris, 1637).Google Scholar
Anquetil-Duperron, Abraham Hyacinthe, Apes urbanae, sive de viris illustribus (Rome, 1633).Google Scholar
Allix, Pierre, Réflexions sur les livres de l’écriture sainte, pour établir la verité de la religion chrétienne (London, 1687).Google Scholar
[Allix, Pierre], The fathers vindicated, by a Presbyter of the Church of England (London, 1697).Google Scholar
Allix, Pierre, The judgement of the ancient Jewish church, against the Unitarians (London, 1699).Google Scholar
Andreae, Samuel, Examen generale Cabbale philosophicae D. Henrici Mori (Herborn, 1670).Google Scholar
Andrewes, Lancelot, A learned discourse of ceremonies retained and used in Christian churches (London, 1653).Google Scholar
Anquetil-Duperron, Abraham Hyacinthe, Zend-Avesta, ouvrage de Zoroastre, contenant les idées théologiques, physiques & morales de ce législateur, les cérémonies du culte religieux qu’il a établi, & plusieurs traits importans relatifs à l’ancienne histoire des Parses (3 vols, Paris, 1771).Google Scholar
[Anon.] Histrio-Mastix. A whip for Webster in Hall, Thomas, Vindiciae Literarum (London, 1654).Google Scholar
Hall, Thomas, Anthropologie abstracted: or the idea of humane nature reflected in briefe philosophicall, and anatomicall collections (London, 1655).Google Scholar
Hall, Thomas, A catalogue of books printed for Thomas Basset, and are to be sold at his shop at the George near Cliffords Inne in Fleet-Street (London, 1672).Google Scholar
Hall, Thomas, An account of Mr. Firmin’s religion; and of the present state of the Unitarian controversy (London, 1698).Google Scholar
Hall, Thomas, A vindication of the memory of the late excellent and charitable Mr. Firmin (London, 1699).Google Scholar
Hall, Thomas, [Edwards, John?] The Reverend and learned Dr. Hammond, and his paraphrase and annotations on the New Testament, vindicated from the rude and unjust reflections made upon him and them by Monsieur Le Clerc (London, 1699).Google Scholar
Hall, Thomas, The lives of the ancient philosophers … extracted from Diogenes Laertius, Casaubon, Menagius, Stanley, Gassendus, Charleton … (London, 1702).Google Scholar
Arbuthnot, John, An examination of Dr. Woodward’s account of the deluge (London, 1697).Google Scholar
ps.-Archytas, Über die Kategorien. Texte zur griechischen Aristoteles-Exegese, ed. Szlezák, T. A. (Berlin, 1972).Google Scholar
Arminius, Jacobus, ‘Declaration of the sentiments’ [1608], in The works of James Arminius, trans., Nichols, J. and Nichols, W. (3 vols, London, 1825–6).Google Scholar
Augustine, , De civitate Dei libri XXII, ed. Vives, J. L. (Basle, 1555 [1st edn=1522]).Google Scholar
Bacon, Francis, Of the proficience and advancement of learning, divine and humane (London, 1605) [=OFB, iv, ed. Kiernan, M. (Oxford, 2000)].Google Scholar
Bacon, Francis, Novum Organum (London, 1620) [=OFB, xi, eds., Rees, G. and Wakely, M. (Oxford, 2004)].Google Scholar
Baker, Augustine, Sancta Sophia: or directions for the prayer of contemplation (Douay, 1657).Google Scholar
Baldi, Bernardino, Cronica de Matematici, overo Epitome dell’istoria delle vite loro (Urbino, 1707).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bampfield, Francis, A grammatical opening of some Hebrew words and phrases in the beginning of the Bible (London, 1684).Google Scholar
Barlow, Thomas, Exercitationes aliquot metaphysicae, de Deo: quod sit objectum metaphysicae (Oxford, 1658 [1st edn=1637]).Google Scholar
Barlow, Thomas, [?], A library for younger schollers: compiled by an English scholar-priest around 1655 eds., DeJordy, A. and Fletcher, H. F. (Urbana, 1961).Google Scholar
Barrow, Isaac, ‘Epistola lectori’, Archimedis opera; Apollonii Pergaei conicorum libri IIII; Theodosii Sphaerica (London, 1675).Google Scholar
Barrow, Isaac, Lectiones mathematicae XXIII, in quibus principia matheseôs generalia exponuntur (London, 1685).Google Scholar
Barrow, Isaac, The usefulness of mathematical learning explained and demonstrated, trans. Kirkby, J. (London, 1734).Google Scholar
Barrow, Isaac, The theological works of Isaac Barrow, D.D., ed. Napier, A. (9 vols, Cambridge, 1859).Google Scholar
Basson, Sébastien, Philosophiae naturalis adversus Aristotelem libri XII (Geneva, 1621).Google Scholar
Bathurst, Ralph, The life and literary remains of Ralph Bathurst, M.D., ed. Warton, T. (2 vols, London, 1761).Google Scholar
Baxter, Richard, The reasons of the Christian religion the first part … also an appendix defending the soul’s immortality against the Somatists or Epicureans and other pseudo-philosophers (London, 1667).Google Scholar
Baxter, Richard, Richard Baxter’s Catholick theologie plain pure, peaceable, for pacification of the dogmatical word warriours (London, 1675).Google Scholar
[Baxter, Richard], Roman tradition examined … in the point of transubstantiation ([London], 1676).Google Scholar
Baxter, Richard, Church-history of the government of bishops and their councils abbreviated (London, 1680).Google Scholar
Baxter, Richard, The true and only way of concord of all the Christian churches (London, 1680).Google Scholar
Baxter, Richard, Of the immortality of mans souls, and the nature of it and other spirits (London, 1682).Google Scholar
Baxter, Richard, A treatise of knowledge and love compared in two parts (London, 1689).Google Scholar
Bayle, Pierre, Lettre à M. L. A. D. C. Docteur de Sorbonne, où il est prouvé par plusieurs raisons … que les cometes ne sont point le presage d’aucun malheur ([Rotterdam], 1682).Google Scholar
Bayle, Pierre, Dictionnaire historique et critique (2nd edn, 3 vols, Amsterdam, 1702).Google Scholar
Bayle, Pierre, The general dictionary, historical and critical (10 vols, London, 1734–41).Google Scholar
Bayle, Pierre, Pensées diverses sur la comète: edition critique, ed. Prat, A. (2 vols, Paris, 1939).Google Scholar
Beaumont, John, Considerations on a book, entituled The theory of the earth (London, 1693).Google Scholar
Beaumont, Joseph, Some observations upon the apology of Dr. Henry More (Cambridge, 1665).Google Scholar
Bentley, Richard, ‘Cl. Viro Oanni Millio’, in Ιωάννου Αντιοχεως του επικλην Μαλάλα χρονικη ιστορια Joannis Antiocheni cognomento Malalae historia chronica (Oxford, 1691).Google Scholar
Bentley, Richard, A dissertation upon the epistles of Phalaris, Themistocles, Socrates, Euripides, and others (London, 1697).Google Scholar
Bentley, Richard, A dissertation upon the epistles of Phalaris, with an answer to the objections of the honourable Charles Boyle (London, 1699).Google Scholar
Berkelius, Abrahamus, Genuina Stephani Byzantini De urbibus et populis fragmenta … accredit Hannonis Carthaginensium Regis Periplus (Leiden, 1674).Google Scholar
Bernard, Edward, Orbis eruditi literaturam à charactere Samaritico hunc in modum favente Deo deduxit Eduardus Bernardus (Oxford, 1689).Google Scholar
[Bernard, Edward], ed., Catalogi librorum manuscriptorum Angliae et Hiberniae (Oxford, 1697).Google Scholar
Beveridge, William, Codex Canonum Ecclesiae primitivae vindicatus et illustratus (London, 1678).Google Scholar
Beveridge, William, The theological works of William Beveridge, ed. Bliss, P. (12 vols, Oxford, 1842–48).Google Scholar
Beza, Theodore, ed. and trans., Iesu Christi D.N. Novum testamentum, sive Novum foedus, ed. and trans. Beza, T. (2nd edn, Geneva, 1582 [1st edn=1565]).Google Scholar
Bibliothèque choisie, 1 (1703).Google Scholar
Bibliothèque choisie, 3 (1704).Google Scholar
Bibliothèque choisie, 7 (1705).Google Scholar
Bibliothèque choisie, 19 (1709).Google Scholar
Bibliothèque choisie, 25 (1712).Google Scholar
Bibliothèque universelle et historique, 7 (1687).Google Scholar
Bibliothèque universelle et historique, 10 (1688).Google Scholar
Bibliothèque universelle et historique, 18 (1690).Google Scholar
Bibliothèque universelle et historique, 19 (1690).Google Scholar
[Biddle, John,] The testimonies of Irenæus, Justin Martyr, Tertullian, Novatianus, Theophilus, Origen, (who lived in the two first centuries after Christ was born, or thereabouts;) as also, of Arnobius, Lactantius, Eusebius, Hilary, and Brightman; concerning that one God, and the person of the Holy Trinity (London, [1653]).Google Scholar
Biggs, Noah, Mataeotechnia medicinae praxeos, the vanity of the craft of physick … with an humble motion for the reformation of the universities (London, 1651).Google Scholar
Birch, Thomas, ‘An historical and critical account of the life and writings of Mr. John Greaves’, in The miscellaneous works of Mr. John Greaves (2 vols, London, 1737).Google Scholar
Birch, Thomas, ‘Account of the life and writings of Ralph Cudworth’, in Cudworth, R., The true intellectual system of the universe, ed. Birch, T. (4 vols, London, 1820).Google Scholar
Blomberg, W. N., An account of the life and writings of Edmund Dickinson (London, 1739).Google Scholar
Blondel, David, Des Sibylles célébrées tant par l’antiquité payenne que par les saincts perés (Paris, 1649).Google Scholar
Blount, Charles, Anima mundi, or, an historical narration of the opinions of the ancients concerning man’s soul after this life (London, 1679).Google Scholar
Blount, Charles, Janua scientiarum, or, a compendious introduction to geography, chronology, government, history, philosophy, and all genteel sorts of literature (London, 1684).Google Scholar
Blount, Thomas Pope, Censura celebriorum authorum, sive, Tractatus in quo varia virorum doctorum de clarissimis cujusque seculi scriptoribus judicia traduntur (London, 1690).Google Scholar
Boate, G., and Boate, A., Philosophia naturalis reformata. Id est, philosophiae Aristotelicae accurata examinatio, ac solida confutatio. Et novae ac verioris introductio (Dublin, 1641).Google Scholar
Bolnest, Edward, Medicina instaurata, or, a brief account of the true grounds and principles of the art of physick (London, 1665).Google Scholar
Borrichius, Olaus, Hermetis Aegyptiorum et chemicorum sapientia ab Hermanni Conringi animadversionibus vindicata (Copenhagen, 1674).Google Scholar
B[ostocke], R[ichard], The difference between the auncient phisicke, first taught by the godly forefathers … and the latter phisicke proceeding from idolaters, ethnickes, and heathen (London, 1585).Google Scholar
Boyle, Charles, Dr. Bentley’s Dissertations on the epistles of Phalaris … examin’d (London, 1698).Google Scholar
Boyle, Robert, The early essays and ethics of Robert Boyle, ed. Harwood, J. (Carbondale and Edwardsville, 1991).Google Scholar
Boyle, Robert, The works of Robert Boyle, eds., Hunter, M. and Davis, E. B. (14 vols, London, 1999–2000).Google Scholar
Boyle, Robert, The correspondence of Robert Boyle, eds., Hunter, M., Clericuzio, A., and Principe, L. M. (6 vols, London, 2001).Google Scholar
Bray, Thomas, Bibliotheca parochialis: or, a scheme of such theological heads both general and particular, as are more peculiarly requisite to be well studied by every pastor of a parish (London, 1697).Google Scholar
Brokesby, Francis, Of education with respect to grammar schools, and the universities; concluding with direction to young students at the universities (London, 1701).Google Scholar
[Brown, Thomas] ‘Preface’, in Twelve dissertations out of Monsieur Le Clerk’s Genesis (London, 1696).Google Scholar
Browne, Thomas, The works of Sir Thomas Browne, ed. Keynes, G. (4 vols, London, 1928–31).Google Scholar
Brucker, Johann Jakob, The history of philosophy, from the earliest times to the beginning of the present century, trans. Enfield, W. (2 vols, London, 1791 [1st edn=Leipzig, 1742–44]).Google Scholar
Bull, George, Examen censurae, sive, responsio ad quasdam animadversiones antehac ineditas in librum cui titulus Harmonia apostolica (London, 1676).Google Scholar
Bull, George, Defensio fidei Nicaenae, ex scriptis, quae extant, Catholicorum doctorum, qui intra tria prima Ecclesiae Christianae saecula floruerunt (Oxford, 1685).Google Scholar
Bull, George, Judicium Ecclesiae Catholicae trium primorum seculorum de necessitate credendi quod Dominus noster Jesus Christus sit verus Deus (Oxford, 1694).Google Scholar
Bulstrode, Whitelocke, An essay of transmigration, in defence of Pythagoras (London, 1692).Google Scholar
Bulteel, J., ed., The Apophthegmes of the ancients taken out of Plutarch, Diogenes Laertius, Elian, Atheneus, Stobeus, Macrobius, and others. Collected into one volume for the benefit and pleasure of the ingenious (London, 1683).Google Scholar
Burgersdijk, Franco, Collegium phyiscum, disputationibus XXXII (Cambridge, 1650 [1st edn=Leiden, 1637]).Google Scholar
Burnet, Gilbert, Four discourses delivered to the clergy of the Diocess of Sarum (London, 1694).Google Scholar
Burnet, Thomas, Telluris theoria sacra: orbis nostri origenem & mutationes generales (2 vols, London, 1681, 1689).Google Scholar
Burnet, Thomas, The theory of the earth: containing an account of the original of the earth (2 vols, London, 1684, 1690).Google Scholar
[Burnet, Thomas], An answer to the late exceptions made by Mr. Erasmus Warren (London, 1690).Google Scholar
[Burnet, Thomas], A short consideration of Mr. Erasmus Warren’s defence (London, 1691).Google Scholar
Burnet, Thomas, Archaeologiae philosophicae: sive doctrina antiqua de rerum originibus (London, 1692).Google Scholar
Burnet, Thomas, Archaelogiae philosophicae: or the ancient doctrine concerning the originals of things (London, 1736).Google Scholar
Burnet, Thomas, Doctrina antiqua de rerum originibus: or, an inquiry into the doctrine of the philosophers of all nations (London, 1736).Google Scholar
[Bury, Arthur], The naked Gospel. Discovering I. What was the Gospel which our Lord and his apostles preached? II. What additions and alterations later ages have made in it? III. What advantages and damages have thereupon ensued? ([London], 1690).Google Scholar
Buxtorf, Johann, Tractatus de punctorum vocalium … in libris Veteris Testamenti (Basle, 1648).Google Scholar
Bysshe, Edward, Παλλαδίου, περι τῶν τῆς Ἰνδίας ἐθνῶν καì τῶν Βραγμανων. Palladius de Gentibus Indiae et Bragmantibus. S. Ambrosius De Moribus Brachmanorum. Anonymus de Bragmanibus. Quorum Priorem & Postremum nunc primum in lucem protulit ex Bibliotheca Regia Edoardus Bissaeus (London, 1665).Google Scholar
Calvin, John, Institutionis Christianae religionis (London, 1576 [1st edn=Geneva, 1559]).Google Scholar
Cartwright, Christopher, Electa thargumico-rabbinica; sive, annotationes in Genesim (London, 1648).Google Scholar
Cary, Viscount Falkland, Lucius, , ‘The Lord of Faulklands reply’, in Sir Lucius Cary, late Lord Viscount of Falkland, his discourse of infallibility, with an answer to it: and his Lordships reply. Never before published (London, 1651).Google Scholar
Cary, Robert, Palæologia chronica. A chronological account of ancient time (London, 1677).Google Scholar
Casaubon, Isaac, De rebus sacris & ecclesiasticis exercitationes XVI (Frankfurt, 1615 [1st edn=London, 1614]).Google Scholar
Casaubon, Isaac, ‘Notae ad Diogenes Laertii Libros’, in Λαερτιου Διογενους Περι Βίων Δογματων και Αποφθεγματων των εν φιλοσοφία ευδοκομησάντων … Laertii Diogenes de vitis dogmatis et apophthegmatis eorum qui in philosophia claruerunt, libri X, ed. Ménage, G. (London, 1664).Google Scholar
Casaubon, Meric, ‘Notes’, in Marcus Aurelius Antoninus the Roman emperor, his meditations concerning himselfe (London, 1634).Google Scholar
Casaubon, Meric, ‘In Marci Antonini De seipso & ad seipsum libros, notae’, in Marci Antonini Imperatoris De seipso et ad seipsum libri XII (London, 1643).Google Scholar
Casaubon, Meric, A discourse concerning Christ his incarnation, and exinanition (London, 1646).Google Scholar
Casaubon, Meric, ‘In Hierocles Commentarium Notae, & Emendationes’, in Hierocles de providentia & fato (London, 1655).Google Scholar
Casaubon, Meric, A treatise concerning enthusiasme … the second edition: revised, and enlarged (London, 1656).Google Scholar
Casaubon, Meric, ‘Notae, & emendationes’, in Λαερτιου Διογενους Περι Βίων Δογματων και Αποφθεγματων των εν φιλοσοφία ευδοκομησάντων … Laertii Diogenes de vitis dogmatis et apophthegmatis eorum qui in philosophia claruerunt, libri X, ed. Ménage, G. (London, 1664).Google Scholar
Casaubon, Meric, Of credulity and incredulity, in things natural, civil and divine (London, 1668).Google Scholar
Casaubon, Meric, Of credulity and incredulity, in things natural, civil and divine, wherein, (among other things) a true and faithful account is given of the Platonick philosophy, as it hath reference to Christianity (London, 1670).Google Scholar
Casaubon, Meric, Generall Learning: A seventeenth-century treatise on the formation of the General Scholar by Meric Casaubon, ed. Serjeantson, R. (Cambridge, 1999).Google Scholar
Castle, George, The chymical Galenist: a treatise wherein the practise of the ancients is reconcil’d to the new discoveries in the theory of physick; shewing, that many of their rules, methods, and medicins, are useful for the curing of diseases in this age (London, 1667).Google Scholar
Cave, William, Apostolici, or the history of the lives, acts, death, and martyrdoms of those who were contemporary with, or immediately succeeded the apostles. As also the most eminent of the primitive fathers for the first three hundred years … the second edition corrected (London, 1682 [1st edn=1677]).Google Scholar
Cave, William, Ecclesiastici, or, the history of the lives, acts, death & writings, of the most eminent fathers of the church, that flourisht in the fourth century (London, 1683).Google Scholar
Cave, William, Scriptorum Ecclesiasticorum historia literaria facili & perspicua methodo digesta. Pars altera (London, 1698).Google Scholar
Cave, William, Epistola apologetica adversus iniquas Joannis Clerici criminationes (London, 1700).Google Scholar
Chaeremon, , Chaeremon: Egyptian priest and Stoic philosopher: the fragments, ed. and trans. van der Horst, P. W. (Leiden, 1984).Google Scholar
Chalcidius, , Chalcidii V.C. Timaeus de Platonis translatus, ed. Meursius, J. (Leiden, 1617).Google Scholar
Chardin, Jean, Voyages de monsieur le chevalier Chardin en Perse et autres lieux de l’orient (3 vols, Amsterdam, 1711).Google Scholar
Charleton, Walter, The darkness of atheism dispelled by the light of nature (London, 1652).Google Scholar
Charleton, Walter, Epicurus’s morals, collected partly out of his owne Greek text, in Diogenes Laertius, and partly out of the rhapsodies of Marcus Antoninus, Plutarch, Cicero, & Seneca (London, 1656).Google Scholar
Charleton, Walter, The immortality of the human soul, demonstrated by the light of nature (London, 1657).Google Scholar
Charleton, Walter, Chorea gigantum, or, the most famous antiquity of Great-Britan [sic], vulgarly called Stone-Heng, standing on Salisbury Plain, restored to the Danes (London, 1663).Google Scholar
Charleton, Walter, Enquiries into human nature in VI. anatomic praelections in the new theatre of the Royal Colledge of Physicians (London, 1680).Google Scholar
Cheynell, Francis, The divine triunity of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, or, the blessed doctrine of the three coessentiall subsistents in the eternall Godhead without any confusion or division of the distinct subsistences or multiplication of the most single and entire Godhead (London, 1650).Google Scholar
Clarke, Samuel, A collection of papers, which passed between the late Learned Mr. Leibnitz, and Dr. Clarke, in the years 1715 and 1716 (London, 1717).Google Scholar
Clement, David, Bibliothèque curieuse historique et critique Catalogue raisonné de livres dificiles a trouver (4 vols, Hannover, 1753).Google Scholar
Clerke, Gilbert, Tractatus tres; quorum qui prior Ante-Nicenismus dicitur … in secundo brevis responsio ordinatur ad D. G. Bulli Defensionem Synodi Necenae ([London], 1695).Google Scholar
Comenius, Johannes Amos, A reformation of schooles designed in two excellent treatises (London, 1642).Google Scholar
Conring, Hermann, De Hermetica Aegyptiorum vetere et Paracelsicorum nova medicina liber unus (Helmstadt, 1648).Google Scholar
Conway, Anne, The Conway letters: the correspondence of Anne, Viscountess Conway, Henry More and their friends, 1642–1684, ed. Nicolson, M. H., rev. Hutton, S. (Oxford, 1992).Google Scholar
Conway, Anne, The principles of the most ancient and modern philosophy [1690] (Cambridge, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coste, Pierre ‘Discours sur la philosophie ancienne et moderne où l’on fait en abregé l’histoire de cette science’, in Régis, Pierre Sylvain, Cours entire de philosophie ou système général selon les principes de M. Descartes (Amsterdam, 1691).Google Scholar
Cotta, John, A short discoverie of the unobserved dangers of severall sorts of ignorant and unconsiderate practisers of physicke in England (London, 1612).Google Scholar
Couplet, Phillipe, ‘Philosophorum Sinensium Principis Confucii Vita’, in Confucius Sinarum philosophus sive scientia Sinensis (Paris, 1687).Google Scholar
Cowley, Abraham, A proposition for the advancement of experimental philosophy (London, 1661).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowley, Abraham, ‘To Mr. Hobs’, The works of Mr Abraham Cowley (5th edn, London, 1679 [1st edn=1668]).Google Scholar
[Coxe, Daniel], A discourse wherein the interest of the patient in reference to physick and physicians is soberly debated (London, 1669).Google Scholar
Creech, Thomas, ‘Notes upon the first book’, in Lucretius his six books of epicurean philosophy and Manilius his five books containing a system of the ancient astronomy and astrology together with the philosophy of the Stoicks (London, 1700).Google Scholar
[Crell, Samuel], ‘Vera & Antiqua Fides de Divinitate Christi asserta’, Tractatus tres; quorum qui prior Ante-Nicenismus dicitur … in secundo brevis responsio ordinatur ad D. G. Bulli Defensionem Synodi Necenae ([London], 1695).Google Scholar
Cressy, Hugh, Exomologesis, or, a faithfull narration of the occasion and motives of the conversion unto Catholick unity of Hugh-Paulin de Cressy (2nd edn, Paris, 1653 [1st edn=1647]).Google Scholar
Cressy, Hugh, Roman-Catholick doctrines no novelties, or, An answer to Dr. Pierce’s court-sermon, miscall’d the primitive rule of Reformation (n.p., 1663).Google Scholar
Cressy, Hugh, Fanaticism fanatically imputed to the Catholick church by Doctour Stillingfleet and the imputation refuted and retorted (n.p., 1672).Google Scholar
Croft, Herbert, Some animadversions upon a book intituled, The theory of the earth (London, 1685).Google Scholar
Cudworth, Ralph, A discourse concerning the true notion of the Lords Supper (London, 1641).Google Scholar
Cudworth, Ralph, The true intellectual system of the universe: the first part; wherein all the reason and philosophy of atheism is confuted; and its impossibility demonstrated (London, 1678).Google Scholar
Cudworth, Ralph, Bibliotheca Cudworthiana sive catalogus variorum librorum plurimus facultatibus (London, 1692).Google Scholar
Cudworth, Ralph, A treatise concerning eternal and immutable morality, with a Treatise of freewill, ed. Hutton, S. (Cambridge, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culverwell, Nathanial, An elegant and learned discourse of the light of nature (London, 1652).Google Scholar
Culverwell, Nathanial, An elegant and learned discourse of the light of nature, eds., Greene, R. A. and MacCallum, H. (Toronto, 1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cumberland, Richard, Origines gentium antiquissimae; or, attempts for discovering the times of the first planting of nations in several tracts [c. 1680] (London, 1724).Google Scholar
Curcellaeus, Stephanus, ‘Praefatio’, in M. Simonis Episcopii … Opera theologica (2 vols, Amsterdam, 1650–65).Google Scholar
Cyprian, , Sancti Caecilii Cypriani Opera recognita & illustrata, ed. Fell, J. (Oxford, 1682).Google Scholar
Dacier, André, La vie de Pythagore, ses Symbols, ses Vers Dorez, & la vie d’Hierocles (Paris, 1706).Google Scholar
Dacier, André, The Life of Pythagoras, with his Symbols and Golden Verses. Together with the Life of Hierocles (London, 1707).Google Scholar
Daillé, Jean, A treatise concerning the right use of the fathers, trans Smith, T. (London, 1651).Google Scholar
Deichgräber, K., ed., Die griechische Empirikerschule: Sammlung der Fragmente und Darstellung der Lehre (Berlin, 1965).Google Scholar
Descartes, René, Oeuvres de Descartes, eds., Adam, C. and Tannery, P. (12 vols, Paris, 1897–1910).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickinson, Edmund, Delphi phoenicizantes sive, tractatus, in quo Græcos, quicquid apud Delphos celebre erat … è josuæ historiâ, scriptisque sacris effinxisse rationibus haud inconcinnis ostenditur (Oxford, 1655)Google Scholar
Digby, Kenelm, Two treatises, in the one of which, the nature of bodies; in the other, the nature of mans soule; is looked into: in way of discovery, of the immortality of reasonable soules (Paris, 1644).Google Scholar
Digby, Kenelm, Letters between the Lord George Digby, and Sir Kenelm Digby knight concerning religion (London, 1651).Google Scholar
Digby, Kenelm, A discourse concerning infallibility in religion written … to the Lord George Digby (London, 1652).Google Scholar
Laërtius, Diogenes, Διογένους Λαερτίου περì Βίων, δογμάτων καì ἀποφθεγμάτων τῶν ἐν φιλοσοφία εὐδοκιμησάντων Βιβλία, ι. Diogenis Laertii de vitis, dogmatis & apophthegmatis eorum qui in philosophia claruerunt, libri X … cum annotationibus Henr. Stephani (Geneva, 1570).Google Scholar
Laërtius, Diogenes, Διογένους Λαερτίου περì Βίων, δογμάτων καì ἀποφθεγμάτων τῶν ἐν φιλοσοφία εὐδοκιμησάντων Βιβλία, ι. Diogenis Laertii de vitis, dogmatis & apophthegmatis eorum qui in philosophia claruerunt, libri X … Is. Casauboni Notae ad lib. Diogenis, multo auctiores & emendatiores (Geneva, 1593).Google Scholar
Laërtius, Diogenes, Διογένους Λαερτίου περì Βίων, δογμάτων καì ἀποφθεγμάτων τῶν ἐν φιλοσοφία εὐδοκιμησάντων Βιβλία, ι. Diogenis Laertii de vitis, dogmatis & apophthegmatis eorum qui in philosophia claruerunt, libri X, ed. and trans. Aldobrandini, T. (Rome, 1594).Google Scholar
Laërtius, Diogenes, Λαερτιου Διογενους Περι Βίων Δογματων και Αποφθεγματων των εν φιλοσοφία ευδοκομησάντων … Laertii Diogenes de vitis dogmatis et apophthegmatis eorum qui in philosophia claruerunt, libri X, ed. Ménage, G. (London, 1664).Google Scholar
Laërtius, Diogenes, The lives, opinions, and remarkably sayings of the most famous ancient philosophers, trans., Fetherstone, T., White, S., Smith, E., Philips, J., Kippax, R., Baxter, W., R. M., and White, S. (2 vols, London, 1688).Google Scholar
Laërtius, Diogenes, Diogenis Laertii de vitis, dogmatibus et apophthegmatibus clarorum philosophorum libri X, ed. Meibom, M. (2 vols, Amsterdam, 1692).Google Scholar
Dodwell, Henry, Two letters of advice I. For the susception of Holy Orders, II. For studies theological, especially such as are rational (Dublin, 1672).Google Scholar
Dodwell, Henry, ‘Prolegomena apologetica, de usu dogmatum Philosophicorum, praecipue Stoicorum, in Theologia’, in Stearne, John, De obstinatione. Opus posthumum, pietatem Christiano-Stoicam, scholastico more, suadens (Dublin, 1672).Google Scholar
Dodwell, Henry, Separation of churches from episcopal government, as practiced by the present non-conformists, proved schismatical (London, 1679).Google Scholar
Dodwell, Henry, A discourse concerning the one altar and the one priesthood insisted on by the ancients in their disputes against schism (London, 1683).Google Scholar
Dodwell, Henry, Praelections academicae in schola historices Camdeniana (Oxford, 1692).Google Scholar
Dodwell, Henry, ‘Dissertatio prima. De vero Peripli, qui Hannonis nomine circumfertur, tempore’, in Geographiae veteris scriptores graeci minores, ed. Hudson, J. (Oxford, 1698).Google Scholar
Dodwell, Henry, Annales Velleiani, Quintilianei, Statiani. Seu vitae P. Velleii paterculi, M. Fabii quintiliani, P. Papinii statii, (obiterque Juvenalis,) pro temporum ordine, dispositae (Oxford, 1698).Google Scholar
Dodwell, Henry, Occasional communion fundamentally destructive to the discipline of the primitive catholick church (London, 1705).Google Scholar
[Duncon, Eleazar], The copy of a letter written by E.D. Doctour of physicke to a gentleman … The latter is a discourse of emperiks or unlearned physitians, wherein is plainly proved that the practise of all those which have not beene brought up in the grammar and university, is alwayes confused, commonly dangerous, and often deadly (London, 1606).Google Scholar
Perron, Du, Davy, Jacques, Replique a la Response du serenissime Roy de la Grand Bretagne (Paris, 1620).Google Scholar
Perron, Du, Davy, Jacques, The reply of the most illustrious Cardinall of Perron, to the Answeare of the most excellent King of Great Britaine, trans. Cary, Elizabeth, Falkland, Lady (Douai, 1630).Google Scholar
Duport, James, ‘Apologiae pro Aristotele, contra novos philosophos. Seu pro veteribus contra nuperos Novatores’, in Musae subsecivae, se, poetica stromata (Cambridge, 1676).Google Scholar
Duppa, Brian, The correspondence of Bishop Brian Duppa and Sir Justinian Isham, 1650–1660, ed. Isham, G. (Northampton, 1951).Google Scholar
Dury, John, The reformed librarie-keeper, with a supplement to the reformed-school (London, 1650).Google Scholar
Edwards, John, A compleat history: or, survey of all the dispensations and methods of religion (London, 1699).Google Scholar
Edwards, Thomas, The first and second part of Gangraena, or, a catalogue and discovery of many of the errors, heresies, blasphemies and pernicious practices of the sectaries of this time, vented and acted in England in these four last years (London, 1646).Google Scholar
Edwards, Thomas, The third part of Gangraena. Or, a new and higher discovery of the errors, heresies, blasphemies, and insolent proceedings of the sectaries of these times (London, 1646).Google Scholar
Empedocles, , L’Empédocle de Strasbourg, eds., Martin, A. and Primavesi, O. (Strasbourg, 1999).Google Scholar
Episcopius, Simon, Opera theologica … editio secunda, cum autographo accuratissime collata (2 vols, London, 1665–78).Google Scholar
Estienne, Henri, ed., Poesis philosophica, vel saltem reliquiae poesis philosophicae Empedoclis, Parmenidis, Xenophanis, Cleanthis, Timonis, Epicharmi; adiuncta sunt Orphei illius carmina qui a suis appellatus fuit ὁ Θεολόγος; item, Heracliti et Democriti loci quidam et eorum epistolae (Geneva, 1573).Google Scholar
Estwick, Nicholas, Mr Bidle’s confession of faith touching the Holy Trinity, wherein his chief designe to overthrow that sacred mystery and the deity of our Blessed Saviour is examined and confuted (London, 1656).Google Scholar
Philalethes, Eugenius [i.e., Vaughan, Thomas], Anima magica abscondita: or a discourse of the universall spirit of nature (London, 1650).Google Scholar
Eutychius, , Contextio Gemmaru, sive Eutychii Patriarchae Alexandrini Annales, eds., Selden, J. and Pococke, E. (2 vols, Oxford, 1658).Google Scholar
Evelyn, John, An essay on the first book of T. Lucretius Carus De rerum natura (London, 1656).Google Scholar
Evelyn, John, The history of religion: a rational account of the true religion, ed. Evanson, R. M. (2 vols, London, 1850).Google Scholar
Evelyn, John, The diary and correspondence of John Evelyn, F.R.S., ed. Bray, W. (4 vols, London, 1854–57).Google Scholar
F. B., A free but modest censure on the late controversial writings and debates of the Lord Bishop of Worcester and Mr. Locke, Mr. Edwards and Mr. Locke, the Honorable Charles Boyle, Esq., and Dr. Bently together with brief remarks on Monsieur Le Clerc’s Ars critica (London, 1698).Google Scholar
al-Farghānī, Abū al-ʿAbbās Aḥmad ibn Muḥammad ibn Kathīr, Muhammedis Fil. Ketiri Ferganensis, qui vulgo Alfraganus dicitur, elementa astronomica, Arabicè & Latinè, ed. and trans. Golius, J. (Amsterdam, 1669).Google Scholar
Fagius, Paul, Exegesis sive expositio dictionum Hebraicarum literalis & simplex, in quatuor capita Geneseos, pro studiosis linguae hebraicae (Isny im Allgäu, 1542).Google Scholar
Farissol, Abraham ben Mordechai, Igeret orḥot shalem, id est, Itinera mundi, sic dicta nempe cosmographia, ed. and trans. Hyde, T. (Oxford, 1691).Google Scholar
Fell, John, ‘Praefatio’, and ‘Annotationes’, in Nemesius, Περι Φυσεως Ανθρωπου … De natura hominis … manuscriptorum codicum collatione, ed. Fell, J. (Oxford, 1671).Google Scholar
Fell, Samuel, Primitiae, sive oratio habita Oxonia in schola theologica (Oxford, 1627).Google Scholar
Ferguson, Robert, The interest of reason in religion; with the import & use of scripture-metaphors; and the nature of the union betwixt Christ & believers (London, 1675).Google Scholar
Fernel, Jean, On the hidden causes of things, ed. and trans., Forrester, J. M. and Henry, J. (Leiden, 2005 [1st edn=1548]).Google Scholar
Flavel, John, Tractatus de demonstratione methodicus & polemicus … in usum Juventutis in Collegio Wadhami apud Oxonienses privatis praelectionibus traditus, ed. Huish, A. (Oxford, 1619, repr. 1624, 1651).Google Scholar
Flood, Robert, Mosiacall philosophy grounded upon the essential truth, or eternal sapience (London, 1659).Google Scholar
Flower, Samuel, ‘A Letter from Mr. F. A. Esq; R. S. S. to the publisher, with a paper of Mr. S. Flowers containing the exact draughts of several unknown characters, taken from the ruines at Persepolis’, Philosophical Transactions, 17 (1693), 775–7.Google Scholar
Foster, Samuel, Miscellanies, or Mathematical lucubrations of Mr. Samuel Foster published and many of them translated into English by … John Twysden (London, 1659).Google Scholar
Frommenius, Andreas, Synopsis metaphysica, ed. Claussen, P. (Oxford, 1669, repr. 1691).Google Scholar
Fulman, William and Gale, Thomas, eds., Rerum Anglicarum scriptorum veterum (Oxford, 1684).Google Scholar
Gaffarel, Jacques, Curiositez inouyes sur la sculpture talismanique des Persans (Paris, 1629).Google Scholar
Gaffarel, Jacques, Unheard-of curiosities: concerning the talismanical sculpture of the Persians (London, 1650).Google Scholar
Gage, Thomas, A new survey of the West-Indies: or, The English American his travel by sea and land (London, 1677).Google Scholar
Gale, Theophilus, The court of the gentiles: or a discourse touching the original of human literature … from the Scriptures, and Jewish church (5 vols, 1669–77).Google Scholar
Gale, Theophilus, The true idea of Jansenisme, both historick and dogmatick (London, 1669).Google Scholar
Gale, Theophilus, Idea theologiae, tam contemplativae quam activae, ad formam s. Scripturae delineata (London, 1673).Google Scholar
Gale, Theophilus, ‘A Summary of the Two Covenants’, in Strong, William, A discourse of the two covenants, ed. Gale, Theophilus (London, 1678).Google Scholar
Gardiner, Samuel, Supremus magistratus habet summam potestatem circa sacra ([Cambridge], 1657).Google Scholar
Gardiner, Samuel, De efficacia gratiæ convertentis, ejúsque agendi modo, determinatio habita Cantabrigiæ in scholis theologicis, A.D. 1658. Pro gradu doctoratûs in S.T (Cambridge, 1660).Google Scholar
Gardiner, Samuel, Ὑποτύποσις, sive Catholicae circa SS. trinitatem fidei delineatio ex scriptis partum ante-Nicaenorm desumpta (London, 1677).Google Scholar
Gardiner, Samuel, Responsio valedictoria ad secundam Sandii epistolam in Vindicias Nuclei sui Historiae ecclesiasticae conscriptam (London, 1681).Google Scholar
Gassendi, Pierre, Exercitationes paradoxicae adversus Aristoteleos (Amsterdam, 1649 [1st edn=Grenoble, 1624]).Google Scholar
Gassendi, Pierre, Animadversiones in decimum librum Diogenis Laertii (3 vols, Lyon, 1649).Google Scholar
Gassendi, Pierre, Three discourses of happiness, virtue, and liberty collected from the works of the learn’d Gassendi, by Monsieur Bernier (London, 1699).Google Scholar
Gataker, Thomas, ‘Praeloquium’, in Aurelius, Marcus, De rebus suis, sive de eis quae ad se pertinere censebat, ed. and trans. Gataker, T. (Cambridge, 1652).Google Scholar
Gaule, John, Pus-mantia the mag-astro-mancer, or, the magicall-astrologicall-diviner posed, and puzzled (London, 1652).Google Scholar
Gaulmin, Gilbert, ed., De vita et morte Mosis, libri tres, cum observationibus (Paris, 1629).Google Scholar
Gaza, Theodorus, ‘In libros de animalibus praefatio’, Aristotelis Stagiritae operum, tomus secundus (Leiden, 1549 [1st edn, 1476]).Google Scholar
Génébrard, Gilbert, De S. Trinitate libri tres contra huius aevi Trinitarios, Antitrinitarios, & Autotheanos (Paris, 1569).Google Scholar
[Goodwin, Timothy [?]], ‘The life and character of … Edward Stillingfleet’, in Stillingfleet, Edward, Works (6 vols, London, 1709–10), i, 1–53.Google Scholar
[Glanvill, Joseph], Lux orientalis, or, an enquiry into the opinion of the eastern sages concerning the praeexistence of souls (London, 1662).Google Scholar
Glanvill, Joseph, Plus ultra, or, the progress and advancement of knowledge since the days of Aristotle (London, 1668).Google Scholar
Glanvill, Joseph, Essays on several important subjects in philosophy and religion (London, 1676).Google Scholar
Glisson, Francis, Tractatus de natura substatiae energetica, seu, De vita naturae (Cambridge, 1672).Google Scholar
Goddard, Guibon, ‘The journal of Guibon Goddard, Esq. M.P.’ [21 Dec 1654], in The diary of Thomas Burton, Esq. Member in the Parliaments of Oliver and Richard Cromwell, from 1656 to 1659 (4 vols, London, 1828).Google Scholar
Goddard, Jonathan, A discourse setting forth the unhappy condition of the practice of physick in London (London, 1670).Google Scholar
Goodwin, Thomas, The works of Thomas Goodwin, ed. Nichol, J. (12 vols, Edinburgh, 1861–66).Google Scholar
Gott, Samuel, The divine history of the genesis of the world explicated & illustrated (London, 1670).Google Scholar
Greaves, John, Astronomica quaedam ex traditione Shal Cholgii Persae una cum Hypothesibus Planetarum (London, 1650).Google Scholar
Greaves, John, ed., Epochae celebriores, astronomis, historicis, chronologis Chataiorum … ex traditione Ulugh Beigi (London, 1650).Google Scholar
Grotius, Hugo, De veritate religionis Christianae. Editio nova, additis annotationibus, in quibus testimonia (Leiden, 1640).Google Scholar
Hakewill, George, An apologie of the power and providence of God in the government of the world (Oxford, 1627).Google Scholar
Hale, Matthew, An essay touching the gravitation, or non-gravitation of fluid bodies, and the reasons thereof (London, 1673).Google Scholar
[Hale, Matthew], Difficiles nugae: or observations touching the Torricellian experiment (London, 1674).Google Scholar
Hale, Matthew, The primitive origination of mankind, considered and examined according to the light of nature (London, 1677).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Hale, Matthew], Observations touching the principles of natural motions (London, 1677).Google Scholar
Hales, John, Concerning the abuses of obscure and difficult places of holy Scripture, and remedies against them (London, 1617).Google Scholar
Hall, Thomas, Vindiciae literarum, the schools guarded, or the excellency and usefulnesse of humane learning in subordination to divinity (London, 1654).Google Scholar
Halley, Edmund, ‘A discourse of the rule of the decrease of the height of the mercury in the barometer’, Philosophical Transactions, 16 (1686), 104–16.Google Scholar
Halley, Edmund, ‘A short account of the cause of the saltness of the ocean … to discover the age of the world’, Philosophical Transactions, 29 (1714–16), 296–300.Google Scholar
Halley, Edmund, ‘Some considerations about the cause of the universal deluge’, Philosophical Transactions, 33 (1724–25), 118–23.Google Scholar
Halley, Edmund, ‘Farther thoughts upon the same subject’, Philosophical Transactions, 33 (1724–25), 123–5.Google Scholar
Halley, Edmund, The correspondence and papers of Edmond Halley, ed. MacPike, E. F. (Oxford, 1932).Google Scholar
Hallywell, Henry, Deus justificatus; or, the divine goodness vindicated and cleared (London, 1668).Google Scholar
Hammond, Henry, Dissertationes quatuor quibus episcopatus jura ex S. Scripturis & Primaeva Antiquitate adstruuntur (London, 1651).Google Scholar
Hammond, Henry, A letter of resolution to six quaeres, of present use in the Church of England (London, 1652).Google Scholar
Hammond, Henry, A paraphrase, and annotations upon all the books of the New Testament (London, 1653).Google Scholar
Hammond, Henry, A continuation of the defence of Hugo Grotius, in answer to the review of his annotations (London, 1657).Google Scholar
Harmer, Thomas, Observations on divers passages of Scripture … the second edition … enlarged with many new observations (2 vols, London, 1776 [1st edn=1764]).Google Scholar
Harris, John, Remarks on some late papers relating to the universal deluge (London, 1697).Google Scholar
Harris, John, The atheistical objections against the being of God and his attributes fairly considered and fully refuted (London, 1698).Google Scholar
Harris, Walter, Pharmacologia anti-empirica, or, a rational discourse of remedies both chymical and Galenical (London, 1683).Google Scholar
Harvey, William, Exercitatio anatomica de motu cordis et sanguinis in animalibus (Frankfurt, 1628).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, William, Disputations touching the generation of animals, ed. and trans. Whitteridge, G. (Oxford, 1981).Google Scholar
Hearne, Thomas, Remarks and collections of Thomas Hearne (11 vols, Oxford, 1885–1921).Google Scholar
Heereboord, Adrian, Meletemata philosophica (Amsterdam & London, 1680 [1st edn=Amsterdam, 1665]).Google Scholar
Herbert, Edward, De religione gentilium, errorumque apud eos causis (Amsterdam, 1663).Google Scholar
Herbert, William, Catalogue of books in various languages … among others … [the] library of the late Mr. William Herbert (London, 1795).Google Scholar
Herbert, William, Catalogue of the entire and curious library of a late well-known collector (London, 1798).Google Scholar
Herbert, William, Catalogue of a choice and valuable library, the property of a gentleman (London, 1798).Google Scholar
Hersent, Charles, ed., In D. Dionysii areopagitae de mystica theologia librum, apparatus, interpretatio, notae, commentarii, paraphrasis, in quibus de supremo divinae contemplationis gradu, unione scilicet et ignoratione luculentissime agitur, praemissa est theologiae mysticae apologia adversus ejus obtrectatores (Paris, 1626).Google Scholar
Heurnius, Johannes, ‘Commentaria’, in Hippocrates, , Prolegomena, et prognosticorum libri tres (Leiden, 1597).Google Scholar
Heylyn, Peter, Cosmographie in four bookes: containing the chorographie and historie of the whole world (London, 1652).Google Scholar
Heylyn, Peter, Theologia veterum, or, the summe of Christian theologie, positive, polemical, and philological, contained in the Apostles creed, or reducible to it according to the tendries of the antients both Greeks and Latines (London, 1654).Google Scholar
Hickman, Henry, Πατρο-σχολαστικο-δικαίωαις, or a justification of the fathers and schoolmen: shewing, that they are not self-condemned for denying the positivity of sin (Oxford, 1659).Google Scholar
Hickman, Henry, Laudensium apostasia: or A dialogue in which is shewen, that some divines risen up in our church since the greatness of the late archbishop, are in sundry points of great moment, quite fallen off from the doctrine received in the Church of England (London, 1660).Google Scholar
Hickman, Henry, The nonconformists vindicated from the abuses put upon them by Mr. Durel and Scrivener (London, 1679).Google Scholar
Hierocles, , Ιεροκλεους φιλοσοφου Υπομνημα εις τα τῦν Πυθαγορειων ἔπη τὰ χρυσα. Hierocli Philosophi commentarius in aurea Pythagoreorum carmina (London, 1654).Google Scholar
Hierocles, , Hieroclis Philosophi Alexandrini commentarius in Aurea Carmina, De Providentia & Fato, ed. Needham, P. (Cambridge, 1709).Google Scholar
Hill, Samuel, A vindication of the primitive fathers against the imputations of Gilbert Lord Bishop of Sarum (London, 1695).Google Scholar
ps.-Hippocrates, The laughing philosopher. Being a letter from Hippocrates the physician to his friend Damagetus, concerning the madness of Democritus (London, 1736).Google Scholar
Histoire des ouvrages des sçavans, 1 (December 1687).Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas, An historical narration concerning heresie and the punishment thereof (London, 1680).Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas, Critique du De mundo de Thomas White, eds., Jacquot, J. and Jones, H. W. (Paris, 1973).Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas, Historia Ecclesiastica, ed. and trans., Springborg, P., Stablein, P., and Wilson, P. (Paris, 2008).Google Scholar
Holstenius, Lucas, ‘Dissertatio De vita, & scriptis Porphyrii’, in Πορφυριου φιλοσοφου Πυθαγορου βιος … liber de vita Pythagorae, ed. Holstenius, L. (Rome, 1630).Google Scholar
Holstenius, Lucas, Notae et castigationes postumae in Stephani Byzantii Ethnika, quae vulgo Peri poleōn inscribuntur (Leiden, 1684).Google Scholar
Holstenius, Lucas, Lucae Holstenii epistolae ad diversos, ed. Boissonade, J. F. (Paris, 1817).Google Scholar
Hooke, Robert, Micrographia, or, some physiological descriptions of minute bodies made by magnifying glasses (London, 1665).Google Scholar
Hooke, Robert, ‘An account of a book’, Philosophical Transactions, 17 (1693), 796–812.Google Scholar
Hooke, Robert, The diary of Robert Hooke, eds., Robinson, H. and Adams, W. (London, 1935).Google Scholar
Hooke, Robert, ‘Lectures of things requisite to a ntral history’, in Oldroyd, D. R., ‘Some writings of Robert Hooke on procedures for the prosecution of scientific inquiry, including his “Lectures of things requisite to a ntral history”’, NRRS, 41 (1987), 145–67, at 151–9.Google Scholar
Horn, Georg, De statu ecclesiae Britannicae hodierno, liber commentarius; una cum appendice eorum, quae in Synodo Glasguensi contra episcopus decreta sunt (Danzig, 1647).Google Scholar
Hospinian, Rudolf, De monachis, hoc est de origine et progressu monachatus, ac ordinum monasticorum (2nd edn, Zurich, 1609 [1st edn=1588]).Google Scholar
Hottinger, Johann Heinrich, Historia orientalis: ex variis orientalium monumentis collecta (Zürich, 1651).Google Scholar
Huet, Pierre-Daniel, Origeniana in Ωριγενους … Origens in Sacras Scripturas commentaria (3 vols, Rouen, 1668).Google Scholar
Huet, Pierre-Daniel, Demonstratio evangelica ad serenissimum delphinium (Paris, 1679).Google Scholar
Hughes, George, An analytical exposition of the whole first book of Moses, called Genesis … delivered in a mornings exercise on the Lords Day (London, 1672).Google Scholar
Huntington, Robert, ‘A Letter from Dublin … concerning the porphyry pillars of Egypt’, Philosophical Transactions, 14 (1684), 624–9.Google Scholar
Huntington, Robert, D. Roberti Huntingtoni, Episcopi Rapotensis, epistolae, ed. Smith, T. (London, 1704).Google Scholar
Hutchinson, Lucy, On the principles of Christian religion, addressed to her daughter; and on theology, ed. Hutchinson, J. (London, 1817).Google Scholar
Hyde, Thomas, ‘In Ulugh Beighi Tabulas Stellarum fixarum Commentarii’, in Beg, Ulugh, Tabulae longitudinis et latitudinis stellarum fixarum, ed. and trans. Hyde, T. (Oxford, 1665).Google Scholar
Hyde, Thomas, ‘De mensuris & ponderibus Sinensium epistola’, in Bernard, Edward, De mensuris et ponderibus antiquis libri tres (Oxford, 1688).Google Scholar
Hyde, Thomas, Historia religionis veterum Persarum, eorumque magorum prospectus ([Oxford], 1699) [Wing H3872A].Google Scholar
Hyde, Earl of Clarendon, Edward, , Animadversions upon a book intituled, Fanaticism fanatically imputed to the Catholic Church (London, 1673).Google Scholar
Iamblichus, , De vita Pythagorae, & protrepticae orationes ad philosophiam, ed. Arcerius, J. (2 vols, [Heidelberg], 1598).Google Scholar
Iamblichus, , In Nichomachi arithmeticam introductionem, ed. Tennulius, S. (Arnhem, 1668).Google Scholar
Iamblichus, , Exhortation to philosophy … including the letters of Iamblichus and Proclus’ commentary on the Chaldean oracles, ed. and trans., Johnson, T. M. and Neuville, S. (Grand Rapids, 1988 [1st edn=1907]).Google Scholar
Iamblichus, , De mysteriis, ed. and trans., Clarke, E. C., Dillon, J. M., and Hershbell, J. P. (Leiden, 2004).Google Scholar
Jackson, Arthur, A help for the understanding of the Holy Scripture … the first part. Containing certain short notes of exposition upon the five books of Moses (Cambridge, 1643).Google Scholar
James, Richard, A sermon delivered in Oxford. Concerning the Apostles preaching and ours (London, 1630).Google Scholar
Jansen, Cornelius, Augustinus seu doctrina S. Augustini de humanae naturae sanitate, aegritudine, medicina adversus Pelagianos & Massilienses (3 vols, Rouen, 1652 [1st edn=Louvain, 1640]).Google Scholar
Jenkin, Robert, The reasonableness and certainty of the Christian religion (London, 1700).Google Scholar
Johnson, William, Agyrto-Mastix, or, some brief animadversions upon two late treatises; … Galeno-Pale; … the Poor man’s physitian (London, 1665).Google Scholar
Josephus, Flavius, Antiquitatum Judaicarum libri quatuor priores, et pars magna quinti, ed. Bernard, E. (Oxford, 1700).Google Scholar
Kidder, Richard, A commentary on the five books of Moses: with a dissertation concerning the author or writer of the said books (London, 1694).Google Scholar
Kircher, Athanasius, Obeliscus Pamphilius, hoc est interpretatio nova et hucusque intentata Obelisci Hieroglyphici (Rome, 1650).Google Scholar
[Le Clerc, Jean], Epistolae theologicae: in quibus varii scholasticorum errores castigantur ([Amsterdam], 1679 [1681]).Google Scholar
[Le Clerc, Jean], Sentimens de quelques theologiens de Holland sur l’histoire critique du Vieux Testament (Amsterdam, 1685).Google Scholar
[Le Clerc, Jean], Défense des sentimens de quelques Théologiens de Hollande (Amsterdam, 1686).Google Scholar
[Le Clerc, Jean], Five letters concerning the inspiration of the Holy Scriptures (London, 1690).Google Scholar
Le Clerc, Jean, ‘Praefatio’, and ‘Notae interpretis in Oracula Chaldaica’, in Stanley, Thomas, Historia philosophiae orientalis. Recensuit, ex Anglica lingua in Latinam transtulit, notis in oracula Chaldaica & indice philologico auxit Joannes Clericus (Amsterdam, 1690).Google Scholar
[Le Clerc, Jean], An historical vindication of The naked Gospel recommended to the University of Oxford, unknown trans. ([n.p.], 1690).Google Scholar
Le Clerc, Jean, XVIII. Prima commata capitis primi Evangelii S. Joannis paraphrasi et animadversionibus (Amsterdam, 1695).Google Scholar
Le Clerc, Jean, Twelve dissertations out of Monsieur Le Clerk’s Genesis (London, 1696).Google Scholar
Le Clerc, Jean, The lives of Clemens Alexandrinus, Eusebius Bishop of Cæsarea, Gregory Nazianzen, and Prudentius the Christian poet: containing an impartial account of their lives and writings, together with several curious observations upon both. Also a short history of Pelagianism (London, 1696).Google Scholar
Le Clerc, Jean, Opera philosophica (Amsterdam, 1698) (further edns, 1704, 1710, 1722).Google Scholar
Le Clerc, Jean, S. Patrum qui temporibus Apostolicis floruerunt, Barnabae, Clementis, Hermae, Ignatii, Polycarpi opera edita et inedita … recensuit & notulas aliquot adspersit Joannes Clericus (2 vols, Antwerp, 1698).Google Scholar
Le Clerc, Jean, Novum Testamentum Domini nostri Jesu Christi, ex versione vulgata, cum paraphrasi et adnotationibus Henrici Hammondi (Amsterdam, 1698).Google Scholar
Le Clerc, Jean, A supplement to Dr. Hammond’s Paraphrase and annotations on the New Testament (London, 1699).Google Scholar
[Le Clerc, Jean?], ‘Praefatio’, in Bilibra veritatis et rationis de מימרא דיי seu verbo Dei, librae Joh. Stephani Rittangelii … opposita. Praemissa est disceptatio de verbo Dei cujus creberrima fit mentio apoud Chaldaeos Paraphrastas ([n.p.], 1700).Google Scholar
Le Clerc, Jean, The lives of the primitive fathers … with their several opinions about the deity of Christ. Which may give some light to the late disputes concerning the Trinity (London, 1701).Google Scholar
Le Clerc, Jean, Veteris testamenti prophetae … cum ejusdem commentario philologico et paraphrasi (Amsterdam, 1731).Google Scholar
Le Clerc, Jean, Epistolario, eds., Grazia, M. and Sina, M. (4 vols, Florence, 1987–97).Google Scholar
Le Clerc, Jean, and [Le Cène, Charles], Entretiens sur diverses matieres de theologie: où l’on examine particulierement les questions de la grace immédiate, du franc-arbitre, di peché originel, de l’incertitude de la metaphysique, & de la prédestination (Amsterdam, 1685).Google Scholar
Leland, John, The divine authority of the Old and New Testament asserted (2 vols, London, 1739–40).Google Scholar
Lightfoot, John, A few, and new observations, upon the booke of Genesis (London, 1642).Google Scholar
Lister, Martin, ‘The manner of making steel … with a guess at the way the ancients used to steel their picks, for the cutting or hewing of porphyry’, Philosophical Transactions, 17 (1693), 865–70.Google Scholar
Lloyd, William, A chronological account of the life of Pythagoras … with an epistle to the Rd Dr. Bentley, about Porphyry’s and Jamblichus’s lives of Pythagoras (London, 1699).Google Scholar
Locke, John, An early draft of Locke’s essay, together with excerpts from his journals, eds., Aaron, R. I. and Gibb, J. (Oxford, 1936).Google Scholar
Lodwick, Francis, On language, theology, and utopia, eds., Henderson, F. and Poole, W. (Oxford, 2011).Google Scholar
Long, Thomas, An answer to a Socinian treatise, call’d The naked Gospel (London, 1691).Google Scholar
Lord, Henry, A display of two forraigne sects in the East Indies vizt: the sect of the Banians the ancient natives of India and the sect of the Persees the ancient inhabitants of Persia (London, 1630).Google Scholar
Lovell, Archibald, A summary of material heads which may be enlarged and improved into a compleat answer to Dr. Burnet’s Theory of the earth (London, 1696).Google Scholar
Lowth, William, A vindication of the divine authority and inspiration of the writings of the Old and New Testament (Oxford, 1692).Google Scholar
Lucretius, , Six books De natura rerum done into English verse, with notes, ed. and trans. Creech, T. (Oxford, 1682).Google Scholar
Smith, Matthew?], A philosophical discourse of the nature of rational and irrational souls (London, 1695).Google Scholar
Maimonides, Moses, Doctor perplexorum: ad dubia & obscuriora Scripturae loca rectiùs intelligenda, ed. Buxtorf, Johann (Basel, 1629).Google Scholar
Magirus, Johann, Physiologiae Peripateticae libri sex cum commentariis (Cambridge, 1642 [1st edn=Frankfurt, 1597]).Google Scholar
Majercik, R., ed., The Chaldean oracles: text, translation, and commentary (Leiden, 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
al-‘Amīd, al-Makīn Ğirğis, Historia Saracenica, ed. and trans. Erpenius, T. (Leiden, 1625).Google Scholar
Maldonado, Juan, Commentarii in quatuor evangelistas … Hac quarta editione omnia diligentius recognita, ac emendata (Lyon, 1602 [1st edn=1601]).Google Scholar
Aurelius, Marcus, Meditations concerning himselfe, ed. and trans. Casaubon, M. (London, 1634).Google Scholar
Aurelius, Marcus, Marci Antonini Imperatoris De seipso et ad seipsum libri XII, ed. Casaubon, M. (London, 1643).Google Scholar
Aurelius, Marcus, De rebus suis, sive de eis quae ad se pertinere censebat, ed. and trans. Gataker, T. (Cambridge, 1652).Google Scholar
Marsham, John, Chronicus canon Aegyptiacus, Ebraicus, Graecus et disquisitiones (London, 1672).Google Scholar
Marsham, John, Canon chronicus … nunc longè emendatior in Germaniâ recusus (Leipzig, 1676).Google Scholar
Mather, Samuel, A defence of the Protestant Christian religion against popery (n.p., 1672).Google Scholar
[Maurice, Henry], A vindication of the primitive church, and diocesan episcopacy in answer to Mr. Baxter’s Church history of bishops, and their councils abridged: as also to some part of his Treatise of episcopacy (London, 1682).Google Scholar
Meldrum, George (praeses), Theses philosophicae quas posuerunt adolescentes, laureæ Magisterialis candidati, in inclyta universitatis Abredonensis (Aberdeen, 1659).Google Scholar
Ménage, Gilles, ‘In Diogenes Laertius observationes et emendationes’, in Λαερτιου Διογενους Περι Βίων Δογματων και Αποφθεγματων των εν φιλοσοφία ευδοκομησάντων … Laertii Diogenes de vitis dogmatis et apophthegmatis eorum qui in philosophia claruerunt, libri X, ed. Ménage, G. (London, 1664).Google Scholar
Meursius, Johannes, ‘Notae’, in Chalcidii V.C. Timaeus de Platonis translatus, ed. Meursius, J. (Leiden, 1617).Google Scholar
Meursius, Johannes, Denarius Pythagoricus. Sive, de numerorum, usque ad denarium, qualitate, ac nominibus, secundum Pythagoricos (Leiden, 1631).Google Scholar
Milbourne, Luke, Mysteries in religion vindicated, or, the filiation, deity and satisfaction of our Saviour asserted against Socinians and others (London, 1692).Google Scholar
Milner, John, Conjectanea in Isaiam ix, I, II. Item in parallela quaedam veteris ac novi testamenti, in quibus versionis 70. Interpretum … cum textu Hebraeo conciliationem (London, 1673).Google Scholar
More, Henry, Conjectura Cabbalistica or, a conjectural essay of interpreting the minde of Moses (London, 1653).Google Scholar
More, Henry, Enchiridion metaphysicum, sive, de rebus incorporeis succincta & luculenta dissertatio (London, 1671).Google Scholar
More, Henry, Remarks upon two late ingenious discourses the one, an essay touching the gravitation and non-gravitation of fluid bodies, the other, observations touching the Torricellian experiment, so far forth as they may concern any passages in his Enchiridium Metaphysicum (London, 1676).Google Scholar
More, Henry, ‘Annotations’, in Rust, George, Two choice and useful Treatises (London, 1682).Google Scholar
Mornay, Phillipe Du-Plessis, A worke concerning the trewness of the Christian religion, trans. Sidney, P. (London, 1587).Google Scholar
al-Nadīm, Muḥammad ibn Isḥāq Ibn, The Fihrist of al-Nadīm: a tenth-century survey of Muslim culture, ed. & trans. Dodge, B. (2 vols, New York, 1970).Google Scholar
Nardi, Giovanni, ‘De funeribus Aegyptiorum’, in Lucretius, , De rerum natura, ed. Nardi, G. (Florence, 1647).Google Scholar
Needham, Peter, ‘Praefatio’, Hieroclis Philosophi Alexandrini commentarius in Aurea Carmina, De Providentia & Fato, ed. Needham, P. (Cambridge, 1709).Google Scholar
Needler, Benjamin, Expository notes, with practical observations: towards the opening of the five first chapters of the first book of Moses called Genesis (London, 1655 [i.e. 1654]).Google Scholar
N[edham], M[archamont], Medela medicinae. A plea for the free profession, and a renovation of the art of physick (London, 1665).Google Scholar
Nelson, Robert, The life of Dr. George Bull, late Lord Bishop of St. David’s (London, 1714).Google Scholar
Nemesius, Περι Φυσεως Ανθρωπου … De natura hominis … manuscriptorum codicum collatione, ed. Fell, J. (Oxford, 1671).Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac, Optice: sive de reflexionibus, refractionibus, inflexionibus & coloribus lucis libri tres (London, 1706).Google Scholar
[Newton, Isaac], ‘An account of the book entituled Commercium Epistolicum’, Philosophical Transactions, 342 (Jan and Feb 1715), 173–224.Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac, Unpublished scientific papers of Isaac Newton, eds., Hall, A. R. and Hall, M. B. (Cambridge, 1962).Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac, The mathematical papers of Isaac Newton, ed. Whiteside, D. T. (8 vols, Cambridge, 1967–81).Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac, Certain philosophical questions: Newton’s Trinity notebook, eds., McGuire, J. E. and Tamny, M. (Cambridge, 1983).Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac, The Principia. Mathematical principles of natural philosophy [1687], eds., and trans., Cohen, I. B. and Whitman, A. (Berkeley, 1999).Google Scholar
Nicholls, William, A conference with a theist. Wherein I. Are shewn the absurdities in the pretended eternity of the world. II. The difficulties in the Mosaick creation are cleared. III. The lapse of mankind is defended, against the objections of Archæologiæ philosophicæ, The oracles of reason, &c. (London, 1696).Google Scholar
Nicolson, William, Letters on various subjects, ed. Nichols, J. (2 vols, London, 1809).Google Scholar
Nicolson, William, The London diaries of William Nicolson, Bishop of Carlisle, 1702–1718, ed. Jones, C. (Oxford, 1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nizolio, Mario, De veris principiis et vera ratione philosophandi contra pseudophilosophos libri IV [1553], ed. Breen, Q. (2 vols, Rome, 1956).Google Scholar
North, John, ‘Ad lectorem’, in Platonis de rebus divinis dialogi selecti Graece & Latine (Cambridge, 1673).Google Scholar
North, Roger, The life of the honourable Sir Dudley North … and … Dr. John North (London, 1744).Google Scholar
North, Roger, The life of the lord keeper North by Roger North, ed. Chan, M. (Lewiston [NY], 1995).Google Scholar
Nouvelles de la république des lettres, 48 (November 1709).Google Scholar
[Nye, Stephen], A brief history of the Unitarians, called also Socinians in four letters, written to a friend ([London], 1687).Google Scholar
[Nye, Stephen], A letter of resolution concerning the doctrines of the Trinity and the Incarnation ([London], 1691).Google Scholar
[Nye, Stephen], Some thoughts upon Dr. Sherlock’s Vindication of the Doctrin [sic] of the Holy Trinity ([London], 1691).Google Scholar
[Nye, Stephen], An accurate examination of the principal texts usually alledged for the divinity of our Saviour ([London], 1692).Google Scholar
[Nye, Stephen], The trinitarian scheme of religion, concerning almighty God and mankind considered both before and after the (pretended) fall (London, 1692).Google Scholar
[Nye, Stephen], Considerations on the explications of the doctrine of the Trinity by Dr. Wallis, Dr. Sherlock, Dr. S—th, Dr. Cudworth, and Mr. Hooker as also on the account given by those that say the Trinity is an unconceivable and inexplicable mystery (London, 1692).Google Scholar
[Nye, Stephen], Considerations on the explications of the doctrine of the Trinity occasioned by four sermons preached by His Grace the Lord Arch-Bishop of Canterbury ([London], 1694).Google Scholar
[Nye, Stephen?], The judgment of the fathers concerning the doctrine of the trinity; opposed to Dr. G. Bull’s Defence of the Nicene faith. Part I. The doctrine of the Catholick Church, during the first 150 years of Christianity; and the explication of the unity of God (in a trinity of divine persons) by some of the following fathers, considered ([London], 1695).Google Scholar
[Nye, Stephen], The agreement of the Unitarians with the Catholick Church being also a full answer to the infamations of Mr. Edwards and the needless exceptions of my Lords the Bishops of Chichester, Worcester and Sarum, and of Monsieur De Luzancy ([London], 1697).Google Scholar
Nye, Stephen, The doctrine of the holy trinity, and the manner of our Saviour’s divinity: as they are held in the Catholic church, and the Church of England (London, 1701).Google Scholar
Lucanus, Ocellus, De universi natura, ed. and trans. Vizzanius, C. E. (Bologna, 1646).Google Scholar
[Oldenburg, Henry], ‘An account of some books’, Philosophical Transactions, 3 (1668), 779–88.Google Scholar
[Oldenburg, Henry], ‘An account of some books’, Philosophical Transactions, 19 (1675), 296–301.Google Scholar
Origen, Against Celsus: translated from the original into English by James Bellamy, Gent (London, n.d. [1709]).Google Scholar
Owen, John, A review of the annotations of Hugo Grotius, in reference unto the doctrine of the deity, and satisfaction of Christ. With a defence of the charge formerly laid against them (Oxford, 1656).Google Scholar
Owen, John, Theologoumena pantodapa, sive, de natura, ortu progressu, et studio verae theologiae, libri sex (Oxford, 1661).Google Scholar
Pace, Giulio, Aristotelis Stagiritae, Peripateticorum principiis naturalis auscultationis libri VIII (Frankfurt, 1596).Google Scholar
Pappus, Pappi Alexandrini collectionis quae supersunt e libris manuscriptis edidit, ed. and trans. Hultsch, F. (3 vols, Berlin, 1876–78).Google Scholar
Parker, Samuel, Tentamina physico-theologica de Deo: sive, theologica scholastica ad normam novae & reformatae philosophiae concinnata & duobus libris comprehensa (London, 1665).Google Scholar
Parker, S., An account and nature of the divine dominion and goodnesse in A free and impartial censure of the Platonick philosophie (2nd edn, Oxford, 1667).Google Scholar
Parker, S., The case of the Church of England, briefly and truly stated in the three first and fundamental principles of a Christian church (London, 1681).Google Scholar
Parker, S., A demonstration of the divine authority of the law of nature and of the Christian religion in two parts (London, 1681).Google Scholar
Parker, S., Religion and loyalty, or, a demonstration of the power of the Christian church within it self (2 pts, London, 1684).Google Scholar
Partliz, Simeon, A new method of physick: or, a short view of Paracelsus and Galen’s practice, trans. Culpeper, N. (London, 1654).Google Scholar
Patrick, Simon, A commentary upon the first book of Moses, called Genesis (London, 1695).Google Scholar
Patrizi, Francesco, Discussionum Peripateticarum tomi IV (4 vols, Basle, 1581 [1st edn=1571]).Google Scholar
Patrizi, Francesco, Nova de universis philosophia (Venice, 1593 [1st edn=Ferrara, 1591]).Google Scholar
Pearson, John, ‘Prolegomena de Editione, Autore, & Opere’, in Hierocles de Providentia & Fato (London, 1655).Google Scholar
Pearson, John, ed., Critici sacri: sive doctissimorum virorum in SS. Biblia annotationes, & tractatus, ed. Pearson, J. (9 vols, London 1660).Google Scholar
Pearson, John, An exposition of the Creed … the second edition, revised and enlarged (London, 1662).Google Scholar
Pearson, John, ‘Reverendissimo doctissimóque viro Aegidio Menagio’, in Λαερτιου Διογενους Περι Βίων Δογματων και Αποφθεγματων των εν φιλοσοφία ευδοκομησάντων … Laertii Diogenes de vitis dogmatis et apophthegmatis eorum qui in philosophia claruerunt, libri X, ed. Ménage, G. (London, 1664).Google Scholar
Pearson, John, ed., Η Παλαιά Διαθήκη κατά τους Εβδομήκοντα Vetus Testamentum Graecum ex versione Septuaginta interpretum (Cambridge, 1665).Google Scholar
Pearson, John, An exposition of the Creed … the fifth edition, revised, and now more enlarged (London, 1683).Google Scholar
Pearson, John, The minor theological works of John Pearson, ed. Churton, E. (2 vols, Oxford, 1844).Google Scholar
Petau, Denis, ‘Notae’, in Συνεσίου επισκόπου Κυρήνης τα απαντα ευρισκόμενα. Synesii episcopi Cyrenensis opera, ed. Petau, D. (Paris, 1612).Google Scholar
Pétau, Denis, ‘Animadversiones’, in Epiphanii Constantiae sive Salaminis in Cypro, episcopi, operum omnium … ed. and trans. Petau, D. (2 vols, Paris, 1622).Google Scholar
Petty, William, Discourse made before the Royal Society … concerning the use of duplicate proportion (London, 1674).Google Scholar
Petty, William, William Petty on the order of nature: an unpublished manuscript treatise, ed. Lewis, R. (Tempe [AR], 2012).Google Scholar
Pfaff, C. M., ‘Dissertatio Praeliminaris’, in Spencer, John, De legibus Hebraeorum, (Tübingen, 1732).Google Scholar
Pico della Mirandola, Giovanni, ‘Preface’, quoted and trans. in Farmer, S. A., Syncretism in the West: Pico’s 900 theses (1486). The evolution of traditional religious and philosophical systems (Tempe, 1998).Google Scholar
Pierce, Thomas, Αυτοκατάκρισις, or, self-condemnation, exemplified in Mr. Whitfield, Mr. Barlee, and Mr. Hickman … Mr Calvin, Mr Beza, Mr Zuinglius, Mr Piscator, Mr Rivet, and Mr Rollock: but more especially on Doctor Twisse, and Master Hobbs (London, 1658).Google Scholar
des Places, E., ed., Oracles chaldaïques, avec un choix de commentaires anciens (3rd edn, rev. Segonds, A., Paris, 1996).Google Scholar
Plato, , Platonis de rebus divinis dialogi selecti Graece & Latine, ed. North, J. (Cambridge, 1673, repr. 1683).Google Scholar
Pococke, Edward, Specimen historiae Arabum, sive Gregorii Abul Farajii Malatiensis, de origine & moribus Arabum (Oxford, 1650).Google Scholar
Pococke, Edward, Historia compendiosa dynastiarum, authore Gregorio Abul-Pharajio (Oxford, 1663).Google Scholar
Poelenburg, Arnold, ‘Oratio funeribus in obitum clarissimi viri D. Stephani Curcellaei’, in Opera theologica (Amsterdam, 1675).Google Scholar
Power, Henry, Experimental philosophy, in three books containing new experiments microscopical, mercurial, magnetical (London, 1664).Google Scholar
Prideaux, John, Hypomnemata logica, rhetorica, physica, metaphysica, pneumatica, ethica, politica, oeconomica (Oxford, 1650).Google Scholar
Prideaux, Humphrey, The Old and New Testament connected in the history of the Jews and neighbouring nations (4th edn, 2 vols, London, 1718 [1st edn=1716–18]).Google Scholar
Prideaux, Humphrey, Letters of Humphrey Prideaux to John Ellis 1674–1722, ed. Thompson, E. M. (London, 1875).Google Scholar
[Przypkovius, Samuel] De pace et concordiae Ecclesiae ([Amsterdam], 1630 [1st edn=1628]).Google Scholar
Quercetanus, Joseph, Liber de priscorum philosophorum verae medicinae materia (Geneva, 1603).Google Scholar
Quercetanus, Joseph, Ad veritatem Hermeticae medicinae ex Hippocratis veterumque decretis ac therapeusi (Paris, 1604).Google Scholar
Quercetanus, Joseph, The practise of chymicall, and hermeticall physicke, trans. Timme, T. (London, 1605).Google Scholar
Randolph, Thomas, Aristippus, or, the joviall philosopher presented in a private shew (London, 1630).Google Scholar
Ray, John, The further correspondence of John Ray, ed. Gunther, R. W. T. (London, 1928).Google Scholar
Reyner, E., A treatise of the necessity of humane learning for a Gospel-preacher (London, 1663).Google Scholar
Richardson, John, Choice observations and explanations upon the Old Testament … to which are added some further and larger observations of his upon the whole book of Genesis (London, 1655).Google Scholar
Rigaud, S. J., The correspondence of scientific men of the seventeenth century (2 vols, Oxford, 1846).Google Scholar
Rivet, André, Theologicae et scholasticae exercitationes CXC in Genesin (Leiden, 1633).Google Scholar
Robinson, Tancred, A Letter sent to Mr. William Wotton … concerning some Late Remarks (n.p., n.d. [1697]).Google Scholar
Robinson, Tancred, New observations on the natural history of this world of matter (London, 1696).Google Scholar
Ross, Alexander, The first booke of questions and answers upon Genesis (London, 1620).Google Scholar
Ross, Alexander, The philosophical touch-stone: or observations upon Sir Kenelm Digbie’s discourses (London, 1645).Google Scholar
Ross, Alexander, The history of the world the second part … being a continuation of the famous history of Sir Walter Raleigh (London, 1652).Google Scholar
de’ Rossi, Azariah ben Moses, The light of the eyes, ed. and trans. Weinberg, J. (New Haven and London, 2001).Google Scholar
de’ Rossi, Azariah ben Moses, Azariah de’ Rossi’s observations on the Syriac New Testament: a critique of the Vulgate by a sixteenth-century Jew, ed. Weinberg, J. (London, 2005).Google Scholar
Rualdus, Joannes, ‘Vita Plutarchi Chaeronensis’, in Plutarchi Chaeronensis omnium quae extant operum (2 vols, Paris, 1624).Google Scholar
[Ruar, Martin and Vorstius, Guilielmus?], Disceptatio de verbo vel sermone Dei, cujus creberrima fit mentio apud paraphrastas chaldaeos Jonathan, Onkelos & Thargum Hierosolymitanum ([Amsterdam], 1646).Google Scholar
Ruar, Martin and Vorstius, Willem, Bilibra veritatis et rationis de מימרא דיי seu verbo Dei, librae Joh. Stephani Rittangelii … opposita. Praemissa est disceptatio de verbo Dei cujus creberrima fit mentio apoud Chaldaeos Paraphrastas ([n.p.], 1700).Google Scholar
Rust, George, A letter of resolution concerning Origen and the chief of his opinions (London, 1661).Google Scholar
Saumaise, Claude, Plinianae exercitationes in Caii Iulii Solini polyhistora (Paris, 1629).Google Scholar
Salmasius, Claudius, ‘Notae et animadversiones in Epictetum et Simplicium’, in Simplicii commentarius in enchiridion Epicteti ex libris veteribus emendatus (Leiden, 1640).Google Scholar
[Salmasius, Claudius], De Episcopis et Presbyteris contra D. Petavium Loiolitam dissertatio prima (Leiden, 1641).Google Scholar
[Salmasius, Claudius], Funus linguae Hellenisticae, sive confutatio Exercitationis de Hellenistis et lingua Hellenistica (Leiden, 1643).Google Scholar
Sand, Christoph, Appendix addendorum, confirmandorum & emendandorum ad Nucelum historiae ecclesiasticae … quarum prima est autoris ejusdem ad D. Samuelem Gardinerum scriptam defensionem (Cologne [Amsterdam?], 1678).Google Scholar
Sandeus, Maximilien, Theologia mystica seu contemplatio divina religiosorum a calumniis vindicata (Mayenne, 1627).Google Scholar
Scaliger, Joseph, Elenchus Trihaeresii Nicolai Serarii … eiusdem delirium fanaticum & impudentissimum mendacium, quo Essenos Monachos Christianos fuisse contendit, validisssimis argumentis elusum (Franeker, 1605).Google Scholar
Scaliger, Julius Caesar, Juliii Ceasaris Scaligeri in libros duos, qui inscribuntur de Plantis, Aristotele Authore, libri duo (Marburg, 1598).Google Scholar
Scheffer, Johann, De natura et constitutione philosophiae Italicae, seu Pythagoricae (Uppsala, 1664).Google Scholar
Schickhard, Wilhelm, בחינת הפירושים Bechinath Happeruschim, hoc est examinis commentationum Rabbinicarum in Mosen prodromus (Tübingen, 1624).Google Scholar
Scrivener, Matthew, Apologia pro S. Ecclesiae patribus, adversus Joannem Dallaeum (London, 1672).Google Scholar
Scrivener, Matthew, A course of divinity, or an introduction to the knowledge of the true Catholick religion especially as professed by the Church of England (London, 1674).Google Scholar
Securis, John, A detection and querimonie of the daily enormities and abuses comitted [sic] in physic concernyng the three parts therof: that is, the physitions part, the part of the surgeons, and the arte of poticaries ([London], 1566).Google Scholar
Selden, John, De jure naturali & gentium, iuxta disciplinam Ebraeorum libri septem (London, 1640).Google Scholar
Selden, John, Joannis Seldeni jurisconsulti opera omnia, ed. Wilkins, D. (London, 1726).Google Scholar
Sennert, Daniel, De Chymicorum cum Aristotelicis et Galenicis consensu ac dissensu (Paris, 1633).Google Scholar
Servetus, Michael, Two treatises of Servetus on the trinity, trans. Wilbur, E. M. (Cambridge [MA], 1932).Google Scholar
al-Shahrastānī, Muḥammad, Livre des religions et des sects, eds., and trans., Gimaret, D., Monnot, G., and Jolivet, J. (2 vols, Paris, 1986).Google Scholar
Sharp, George, ‘Προλεγομενα de vita et scriptis doctissimi viri Thomae Hyde, S.T.P’, in Hyde, Thomas, Syntagma dissertationum, ed. Sharp, G. (Oxford, 1767), i–xxiv.Google Scholar
Sharp, Thomas, The life of John Sharp … Archbishop of York, ed. Newcome, T. (London, 2 vols, 1825).Google Scholar
Sheffield, Duke of Buckingham, John, The works of John Sheffield, Earl of Mulgrave, Marquis of Normandy, and Duke of Buckingham (London, 1723).Google Scholar
Sherburne, Edward, Seneca’s answer, to Lucilius his quaere; why good men suffer misfortunes seeing there is a divine providence? (London, 1648).Google Scholar
Sherburne, Edward, The tragedies of L. Annaeus Seneca the philosophers; viz. Medea, Phaedra and Hippolytus, Troades, or the Royal Captives, and the rape of Helen … to which is prefixed the life and death of Seneca the philosopher (London, 1702).Google Scholar
Sherley, Thomas, A philosophical essay declaring the probable causes whence stones are produced in the greater world (London, 1672).Google Scholar
Sherlock, William, A discourse concerning the knowledge of Jesus Christ, and our union and communion with him (London, 1674).Google Scholar
Sherlock, William, A vindication of the doctrine of the holy and ever blessed trinity and the incarnation of the Son of God … the second edition (London, 1691 [1st edn=1690]).Google Scholar
Sherlock, William, A defence of Dr. Sherlock’s notion of a trinity in unity (London, 1694).Google Scholar
Simon, Richard, A critical history of the Old Testament, trans. [Dickinson, H.] (London, 1682).Google Scholar
Simpson, William, Zymologia physica, or, a brief philosophical discourse of fermentation, from a new hypothesis of acidum and sulphur (London, 1675).Google Scholar
Simpson, William, Philosophical dialogues concerning the principles of natural bodies (London, 1677).Google Scholar
Smith, Thomas, ‘Huntingtoni vita’, in D. Roberti Huntingtoni, Episcopi Rapotensis, epistolae, ed. Smith, T. (London, 1704).Google Scholar
South, Robert, Animadversions upon Dr. Sherlock’s book, entituled A vindication of the holy and ever-blessed trinity (London, 1693).Google Scholar
South, Robert, Tritheism charged upon upon Dr. Sherlock’s new notion of the Trinity and the charge made good (London, 1695).Google Scholar
[Souverain, Jacques], Le Platonisme devoilé, ou essai touchant le Verbe Platonicien ([Amsterdam], 1700).Google Scholar
Souverain, Jacques, Platonism unveil’d: or an essay concerning the notions and opinions of Plato, and some antient and modern divines his followers, in relation to the Logos ([London], 1700).Google Scholar
Spencer, John, A discourse concerning vulgar prophecies in A discourse concerning prodigies (2nd edn, Cambridge, 1665).Google Scholar
Spencer, John, De legibus Hebraeorum ritualibus et earum rationibus, libri tres (The Hague, 1686 [1st edn=Cambridge, 1683–5]).Google Scholar
Spencer, William, ‘Ad lectorem’, in Ωριγενης κατα Κελσου … Origenis contra Celsum libri octo. Ejusdem Philocalia (Cambridge, 1658).Google Scholar
Sprackling, Robert, Medela ignorantiae: or a just and plain vindication of Hippocrates and Galen from the groundless imputations of M. N. (London, 1665).Google Scholar
St. Clair, Robert, ‘To the Reader’, in The Abyssinian philosophy confuted: or, Telluris theoria neither sacred, nor agreeable to Reason (London, 1697).Google Scholar
Stanhope, George, ed., Epictetus his morals, with Simplicius his comment (London, 1694).Google Scholar
Stanley, Thomas, The history of philosophy … containing those on whom the attribute of wise was conferred (4 vols, London, 1655–62).Google Scholar
Stanley, Thomas, ed. and trans., Aeschyli tragoediae septem: cum Scholiis Graecis omnibus (London, 1663).Google Scholar
Stanley, Thomas, The history of philosophy: containing the lives, opinions, actions and discourses of the philosophers of every sect … the second edition (London, 1687).Google Scholar
Stanley, Thomas, Historia philosophiae orientalis. Recensuit, ex Anglica lingua in Latinam transtulit, notis in oracula Chaldaica & indice philologico auxit Joannes Clericus (Amsterdam, 1690).Google Scholar
Stanley, Thomas, The history of philosophy: containing the lives, opinions, actions and discourses of the philosophers of every sect … the third edition (London, 1701).Google Scholar
Stanley, Thomas, Historia philosophiae: vitas, opiniones, resque gestas, et dicta philosophorum sectae cujusvis complexa, ex anglico sermone in latinum translata, emendata, variis dissertationibus atque observationibus passim aucta, ed. and trans. Olearius, G. (2 vols, Lepizig, 1711).Google Scholar
Stanley, Thomas, The history of philosophy … in which the innumerable mistakes, both in the text and notes of all former editions are corrected … (London, 1743).Google Scholar
Stanley, Thomas, Aeschyli tragoediae quae supersunt, ed. Butler, S. (4 vols, Cambridge, 1809–16).Google Scholar
Stanley, Thomas, The poems and translations of Thomas Stanley, ed. Crump, G. M. (Oxford, 1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, Thomas, The history of philosophy … with a new introduction by Knud Haakonssen (Bristol, 2000).Google Scholar
Stearne, John, De obstinatione. Opus posthumum, pietatem Christiano-Stoicam, scholastico more, suadens (Dublin, 1672).Google Scholar
Stegmann, Joachim, Brevis disquisitio, an et quomodo vulgo dicti Evangelici Pontificos … solide atque evidenter refutare queant ([Amsterdam], 1633).Google Scholar
Stegmann, Joachim, Brevis disquisitio; or, a brief enquiry touching a better way then is commonly made use of, to refute Papists, and reduce Protestants to certainty and unity in religion, trans. Biddle, J. (London, 1653).Google Scholar
Stillingfleet, Edward, Homo naturâ est zōon politikon ([Cambridge], 1657) [ESTC S5595].Google Scholar
Stillingfleet, Edward, Origines sacrae, or, a rational account of the grounds of Christian faith, as to the truth and divine authority of the Scriptures and the matters therein contained (London, 1662).Google Scholar
Stillingfleet, Edward, A rational account of the grounds of Protestant religion being a vindication of the Lord Archbishop of Canterbury’s relation of a conference (London, 1665).Google Scholar
Stillingfleet, Edward, A discourse concerning the idolatry practised in the Church of Rome and the danger of salvation in the communion of it (London, 1671).Google Scholar
Stillingfleet, Edward, Origines Britannicae, or, the antiquities of the British churches (London, 1685).Google Scholar
Stillingfleet, Edward, A relation of a conference held about religion at London … with some gentlemen of the Church of Rome (London, 1687).Google Scholar
Stillingfleet, Edward, The Bishop of Worcester’s answer to Mr. Locke’s second letter (London, 1698).Google Scholar
Stubbe, H., A reply unto the letter written to Mr Henry Stubbe in defense of the history of the Royal Society (Oxford, 1671).Google Scholar
Stubbe, H., An account of the rise and progress of Mahometanism with the life of Mahomet, ed. Shairani, H. M. Khan (London, 1911).Google Scholar
Sturm, Johann Christoph, Epistola ad virum celeberrimum Henricum Morum de spiritu ipsius Hylarchio (Nurenberg, 1676).Google Scholar
Suárez, Francisco, Metaphysicae disputationes, in quibus universa naturalis theologia ordinate traditur (Venice, 1605 [original=1597]).Google Scholar
Sydenham, Thomas, Observationes medicae circa morborum acutorum historiam et curationem (London, 1676).Google Scholar
Sydenham, Thomas, The works of Thomas Sydenham, ed. and trans. Latham, R. G. (2 vols, London, 1848–50).Google Scholar
Syncellus, , The chronography of George Synkellos: a Byzantine chronicle of universal history from the creation, eds., and trans., Adler, W. and Tuffin, P. (Oxford, 2002).Google Scholar
Synesius, , Συνεσίου επισκόπου Κυρήνης τα απαντα ευρισκόμενα. Synesii episcopi Cyrenensis opera, ed. Pétau, D. (Paris, 1612).Google Scholar
Szlichtyng, Jonasz, De SS. Trinitate, de moralibus N. & V. Testamenti praceptis, itemque de sacris, eucharistiae, & baptimi ritibus ([n.p.], 1637).Google Scholar
Tachenius, Otto, Otto Tachenius his Hippocrates chymicus, trans. W[arr], J[ohn] (London, 1677).Google Scholar
Temple, William, ‘Upon ancient and modern learning’, in Miscellanea … the second part (London, 1690).Google Scholar
Tenison, Thomas, Of idolatry: a discourse, in which is endeavoured a declaration of, its distinction from superstition; its notion, cause, commencement, and progress (London, 1678).Google Scholar
Tenison, Thomas, A discourse concerning a guide in matters of faith with respect especially to the Romish pretence of the necessity of such a one as is infallible (London, 1683).Google Scholar
Tenison, Thomas, The difference betwixt the Protestant and Socinian methods in answer to a book written by a Romanist (London, 1687).Google Scholar
T[hompson], J[ames], Helmont disguised: or, the vulgar errours of impericall and unskilfull practisers of physick confuted (London, 1657).Google Scholar
Thomson, George, Galeno-pare: or, a chymical trial of the Galenist, that their dross in physick may be discovered (London, 1665).Google Scholar
Thorndike, Herbert, An epilogue to the tragedy of the Church of England (London, 1659).Google Scholar
Thorndike, Herbert, De ratione ac jure finiendi controversias ecclesiae disputatio (London, 1670).Google Scholar
Thorndike, Herbert, The theological works of Herbert Thorndike, ed. Parker, J. H. (6 vols, Oxford, 1844–56).Google Scholar
Tillotson, John, Sermons concerning the divinity and incarnation of our blessed Saviour preached in the Church of St. Lawrence Jewry (2nd edn, London, 1695 [1st edn=1693]).Google Scholar
Locrus, Timaeus, On the nature of the world and the soul, ed. and trans. Tobin, T. H. (Chico [CA], 1985).Google Scholar
Toland, John, Dissertationes duae, Aedeisidaemon et origines Judaicae (The Hague, 1709).Google Scholar
Turner, John, Two exercitations. The first attempting to demonstrate that the Jews till after the return from … Babylon, were not allowed the publick and promiscuous use of the canonical books of the Old Testament. The second concerning the … Tetragrammaton (London, 1684).Google Scholar
Turner, John, Boaz and Ruth … With a discovery of several things, as well in the Eastern, as the Roman antiquities, never yet explained or understood by any (London, 1685).Google Scholar
Turner, John, A Discourse concerning the Messias … To which is prefixed a large preface, asserting and explaining the doctrine of the Blessed Trinity against the late writer of the Intellectual system (London, 1685).Google Scholar
Twells, Leonard, ‘The life of … Pocock’, in The theological works of … Pococke, ed. Twells, L. (2 vols, London, 1740).Google Scholar
Twysden, John, Problematum quorundam mathematicorum … analytica solutio, et constructio (London, 1659).Google Scholar
Twysden, John, Disquisition touching the sibyls and the sibylline writings in which their number, antiquity, and by what spirit they were inspired, are succinctly discussed, the objections made by Opsopaeus, Isaac Casaubon, David Blondel, and others, are examined, as also the authority of those writings asserted (London, 1662).Google Scholar
Twysden, John, Medicina veterum vindicata, or, an anwer to a book, entitled Medela medicinae (London, 1666).Google Scholar
Twysden, John, The use of the general planishpere, called the analemma (London, 1685).Google Scholar
Beg, Ulugh, Tabulae longitudinis et latitudinis stellarum fixarum, ed. and trans. Hyde, T. (Oxford, 1665).Google Scholar
Ursinus, Johannes Henricus, De Zoroastre Bactriano, Hermete Trismegisto, Sanchoniathone Phoenicio eorumque scriptis et aliis contra Mosaicae scripturae antiquitatem exercitationes familiares (Nürnberg, 1661).Google Scholar
Ussher, James, The whole works of the most Rev. James Ussher, D.D., ed. Elrington, C. R. (17 vols, Dublin, 1847–64).Google Scholar
Valla, Lorenzo, Dialectical disputations [1439], eds., and trans., Copenhaver, B. P. and Nauta, L. (2 vols, Cambridge [MA], 2012).Google Scholar
de Veil, Charles-Marie, A letter to the Honourable Robert Boyle … defending the divine authority of the Holy Scripture (London, 1683).Google Scholar
Vives, Juan Luis, ‘De Aristotelis operibus censura’, in Aristotle, , Opera (12 vols, Venice, 1560).Google Scholar
Vives, Juan Luis, On education: a translation of the De trandendis disciplinis of Juan Luis Vives, ed. and trans. Watson, F. (Cambridge, 1913).Google Scholar
Vizzanius, Emmanuel, ‘Praefatio’, in Ocellus Lucanus philosophus De universi natura, ed. and trans. Vizzanius, C. E. (Bologna, 1646).Google Scholar
Vorstius, Guilelmus, Constitutiones de fundamentis legis Rabbi Mosis F. Maiiemon (Amsterdam, 1638).Google Scholar
Vossius, Gerardus Joannes, De theologia gentili, et physiologia Christiana; sive de origine ac progressu idololatriae (Amsterdam, 1641).Google Scholar
Vossius, Gerardus Joannes, Disseratationes tres de tribus symbolis, Apostolico, Athanasiano, et Constantinopolitano (Amsterdam, 1642).Google Scholar
Vossius, Gerardus Joannes, De artis poeticae natura, ac constitutione liber (Amsterdam, 1647).Google Scholar
Vossius, Gerardus Joannes, De philosophia et philosophorum sectis libri II (The Hague, 1658).Google Scholar
Vossius, Gerardus Joannes, Doctissimi clarissimique Gerardi Johan. Vossii et Clarorum virorum ad eum epistolae, ed. Colomiès, P. (London, 1690).Google Scholar
Wake, William, The genuine epistles of the apostolical fathers, S. Barnabas, S. Ignatius, S. Clement, S. Polycarp, the Shepherd of Hermas, and the martyrdoms of St. Ignatius and St. Polycarp (London, 1693).Google Scholar
Walker, George, The history of the creation, as it is written by Moses in the first and second chapters of Genesis, plainly opened and expounded (London, 1641).Google Scholar
Walker, Henry, בראשית The creation of the world being an exposition on the Hebrew in the first chapter of Genesis (London, 1649).Google Scholar
Wallis, John, A treatise of algebra, both historical and practical. Shewing, the original, progress, and advancement thereof, from time to time; and by what steps it hath attained to the height at which now it is (London, 1685).Google Scholar
Wallis, John, The correspondence of John Wallis, eds., Beeley, P. and Scriba, C. J. (3 vols, Oxford, 2003–12).Google Scholar
[Ward, Seth and Wilkins, John], Vindiciae academiarum containing some briefe animadversions upon Mr Websters book stiled, The examination of academies (Oxford, 1654).Google Scholar
[Warner, John], Anti-Haman … where in is shewed the conformity of the doctrine, worship, & practice of the Roman Catholick church with those of the purest times (n.p., 1679).Google Scholar
Warner, John, The considerator considered: or, a brief view of certain considerations upon the Biblia polyglotta (London, 1659).Google Scholar
Warren, Erasmus, Geologia: or a discourse concerning the earth before the deluge (London, 1690).Google Scholar
Warren, Erasmus, A defence of the Discourse concerning the earth before the flood (London, 1691).Google Scholar
Warton, Thomas, ‘The life of Ralph Bathurst’, in The life and literary remains of Ralph Bathurst, M.D. (2 vols, London, 1761).Google Scholar
Webb, John, The antiquity of China, or an historical essay, endeavouring a probability that the language of the empire of China is the primitive language spoken through the whole world before the confusion of Babel (London, 1669, reiss. 1678).Google Scholar
Wendelin, Marcus Friedrich, Contemplationum physicarum sectio I. Quae physiologiae generalis, de principiis & affectionibus corporis naturalis (Cambridge, 1648).Google Scholar
Whiston, William, Memoirs of the life and writing of Mr William Whiston … the second edition, corrected (London, 1753 [1st edn=1749–50]).Google Scholar
Whitby, Daniel, An endeavour to evince the certainty of Christian faith in general (London, 1671).Google Scholar
Whitby, Daniel, A paraphrase and commentary upon all the epistles of the New Testament (London, 1700).Google Scholar
White, John, A commentary upon the three first chapters of the first book of Moses called Genesis (London, 1656).Google Scholar
White, Thomas, Institutionum peripateticarum ad mentem summi viri clarissimíque philosophi Kenelmi Equitis Digbaei, pars theorica: item appendix theologica de origine mundi (London, 1647).Google Scholar
White, Thomas, An apology for Rushworth’s dialogues wherein the exceptions for the Lords Falkland and Digby and the arts of their commended Daillé discover’d (Paris, 1654).Google Scholar
White, Thomas, Sciri, sive, Sceptices & scepticorum jure disputationis exclusio (London, 1663).Google Scholar
White, Thomas, An exclusion of scepticks from all title to dispute: being an answer to The vanity of dogmatizing (London, 1665).Google Scholar
Wilkins, John, Mathematicall magick, or the wonders that may be performed by mechanicall geometry (London, 1648).Google Scholar
Wilkins, John, Ecclesiastes, or, a discourse concerning the gift of preaching (3rd edn, London, 1651 [1st edn=1646]).Google Scholar
Wilkins, John, Le monde dans la lune, divisé en deux livres. Le premier, prouvant que la lune peut ester un monde, le second, que la terre peut-estre une Planette. De la Traduction du Sr de la Montagne (Rouen, 1656).Google Scholar
Wilkins, John, Ecclesiastes: or, a discourse concerning the gift of preaching … the seventh edition, ed. Williams, J. (London, 1690).Google Scholar
Willis, Francis, Synopsis physicae tam Aristotelicae, quam novae ad usum scholae accommodata (London, 1690).Google Scholar
Willis, Thomas, Diatribae duae medico philosophicae … editio secunda, ab authore recognita, atque ab eodem multiplici auctario lucupleta (London, 1660).Google Scholar
Willis, Thomas, De anima brutorum quae hominis vitalis ac sensitiva est, exercitationes duae (London, 1672).Google Scholar
Willis, Thomas, Pharmaceutice rationalis, sive, Diatriba de medicamentorum operationibus in humano corpore (Oxford, 1674).Google Scholar
Windet, James, De vita functorum statu, ex Hebraoerum atque Graecorum comparatis sententiis concinnatus (London, 1663).Google Scholar
Windet, James, ed. and trans., Olympiodorus, , Vita Platonis, in Diogenis Laertii de vitis, dogmatibus et apophthegmatibus clarorum philosophorum libri X, ed. Meibom, M. (2 vols, Amsterdam, 1692).Google Scholar
Witsius, Hermann, Aegyptiacam et ΔΕΚΑΦΥΛΟΝ. Sive de Aegyptiacorum sacrorum cum Hebraicis collatione libri tres (Amsterdam, 1696).Google Scholar
Wolff, Johann Christoph, Manichaeismus ante Manichaeos, et in Christianismo redivivus (Hamburg, 1707).Google Scholar
Wood, Anthony à, The life and times of Anthony Wood, antiquary, of Oxford, 1632–1695 (5 vols, Oxford, 1891–1900).Google Scholar
[Woodhead, Abraham], The guide in controversies, or a rational account of the doctrine of Roman-Catholicks concerning the ecclesiastical guide in controversies of religion (London, 1667).Google Scholar
Woodward, John, An account of some Roman urns, and other antiquities … with brief reflections upon the antient and present state of London (London, 1713).Google Scholar
Woodward, John, The natural history of the Earth, illustrated, inlarged, and defended, ed. and trans. Holloway, B. (London, 1726).Google Scholar
Woodward, John, Of the wisdom of the antient Egyptians … a discourse concerning their arts, their sciences, and their learning (London, 1777).Google Scholar
Worthington, John, The diary and correspondence of Dr John Worthington, eds., Crossley, J. and Christie, R. C. (2 vols, London, 1847–86).Google Scholar
Wotton, William, Some thoughts concerning a proper method of studying divinity, ed. Cotton, H. (Oxford, 1818 [1st edn=London, 1734]).Google Scholar
Wren, Christopher, ‘Oratio inauguralis, habita Londini in collegio Greshamensi per Christophorum Wren, A.M. astronomiae professorem electum, ann. 1657, aetatis suae 25’, in Ward, John, The lives of the Professors of Gresham College (London, 1740).Google Scholar
Wren, Christopher, ‘Inaugural oration as Gresham Professor of astronomy’ (1657), in Wren, Stephen, Parentalia (London, 1750).Google Scholar
Wren, Christopher, Memoirs of the life and works of Sir Christopher Wren, ed. Elmes, J. (London, 1823).Google Scholar
[Zwicker, Daniel] Irenicum irenicorum, seu reconciliatoris Christianorum hodiernorum norma triplex, sana omnium hominum ratio, Scriptura Sacra, & traditiones ([Amsterdam], 1658).Google Scholar
Åkerman, S., Queen Christina of Sweden and her circle: the transformation of a seventeenth century philosophical libertine (Leiden, 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albrecht, M., Eklektik: Eine Begriffsgeschichte mit Hinweisen auf die Philosophie- und Wissenschaftsgeschichte (Stuttgart, 1994).Google Scholar
Allan, D., ‘Ross, Alexander’, ODNB.Google Scholar
Allan, D., ‘“An Ancient Sage Philosopher”: Alexander Ross and the defence of philosophy’, The Seventeenth Century, 16 (2001), 68–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, D. C., ‘The rehabilitation of Epicurus and his theory of pleasure in the early Renaissance’, Studies in Philology 41 (1941), 1–15.Google Scholar
Allen, D. C., ‘The predecessors of Champollion’, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 104 (1960), 527–47.Google Scholar
Allen, D. C., The legend of Noah: Renaissance rationalism in art, science, and letters (Illinois, 1963).Google Scholar
Allen, D. C., Mysteriously meant: the rediscovery of pagan symbolism and allegorical interpretation in the Renaissance (Baltimore, 1970).Google Scholar
Allen, M. J. B., ‘Marsilio Ficino on Plato, the neoplatonists and the Christian doctrine of the trinity’, Renaissance Quarterly, 37 (1984), 555–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, M. J. B., ‘Marsilio Ficino, Hermes Trismegistus and the Corpus Hermeticum’, in New perspectives on Renaissance thought, eds., Henry, J. and Hutton, S. (London, 1990), 38–47.Google Scholar
Allen, M. J. B., Synoptic Art: Marsilio Ficino on the history of Platonic interpretation (Florence, 1998).Google Scholar
Anselment, R. A., ‘Thomas Sprat’s The plague of Athens; Thucydides, Lucretius, and the “Pindaric Way”’, Bulletin of the John Rylands University Library of Manchester, 78 (1996), 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anstey, P., ‘Boyle on occasionalism: an unexamined source’, JHI, 60 (1999), 57–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anstey, P., ‘The Christian virtuoso and the Reformers: are there Reformation roots to Boyle’s natural philosophy?’, Lucas, 27/8 (2000), 5–40.Google Scholar
Anstey, P., ‘Robert Boyle and the heuristic value of mechanism’, SHPS, 33 (2002), 161–74.Google Scholar
Anstey, P., ‘The methodological origins of Newton’s queries’, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 35 (2004), 247–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anstey, P., ‘Experimental versus speculative natural philosophy’, in The science of nature in the seventeenth century, eds., Anstey, P. R. and Schuster, J. A. (Leiden, 2005), 215–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anstey, P., ‘John Locke and Helmontian medicine’, in The body as object and instrument of knowledge: embodied empiricism in early modern science, eds., Wolfe, C. T. and Gal, O. (Dordrecht, 2010), 93–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anstey, P., ‘The matter of medicine: new medical matter theories in mid-seventeenth-century England’, in Vanishing matter and the laws of motion: Descartes and beyond, eds., Jalobeanu, D. and Anstey, P. R. (London, 2011), 61–79.Google Scholar
Anstey, P., ‘Francis Bacon and the classification of natural history’, ESM, 17 (2012), 11–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anstey, P., ed., The Oxford handbook of British philosophy in the seventeenth century (Oxford, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anstey, P., and Hunter, M., ‘Robert Boyle’s “Designe about natural history”’, ESM, 13 (2008), 83–126.Google Scholar
Anstey, P. and Hunter, M., and Burrows, J., ‘John Locke, Thomas Sydenham, and the authorship of two medical essays’, Electronic British Library Journal (2009), article 3.Google Scholar
Anstey, P. and Hunter, M. and Burrows, J., and Campbell, K., Jacovides, M., ‘Locke’s experimental philosophy’, Metascience, 22 (2013), 1–22.Google Scholar
Anstey, P. and Hunter, M. and Burrows, J. and Campbell, K., Jacovides, M., and Vanzo, A., ‘The origins of early modern experimental philosophy’, IHR, 22 (2012), 499–518.Google Scholar
Antognazza, M. R., Leibniz on the trinity and the incarnation: reason and revelation in the seventeenth century (Yale, 2008 [Italian original=1999]).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, M., ‘Thomas Stanley’s Aeschylus: Renaissance practical criticism of Greek Tragedy’, Illinois Classical Studies, 9 (1984), 229–49.Google Scholar
van Asselt, W. J., ‘Covenant theology as relational theology: the contributions of Johannes Cocceius (1603–1669) and John Owen (1618–1683) to a living Reformed theology’, in The Ashgate research companion to John Owen’s theology, eds., Kapic, K. M. and Jones, M. (Aldershot, 2012), 65–84.Google Scholar
Aslanian, S. D., From the Indian Ocean to the Mediterranean: the global trade networks of Armenian merchants from New Julfa (Berkeley, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Assmann, J., Moses the Egyptian: the memory of Egypt in Western monotheism (Cambridge [MA], 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asso, C., ‘Erasmus redivivus. Alcune osservazioni sulla filologia Neotestamentaria de Jean Le Clerc’, in Vico Nella Storia della Filologia, eds., Caianiello, S. and Viana, A. (Naples, 2004), 79–115.Google Scholar
Backhouse, J. H., The editio princeps of the Epistle of Barnabas by Archbishop Ussher … with a dissertation on the literary history of that edition (Oxford, 1883).Google Scholar
Backhouse, J. H., ed., The reception of the church fathers in the West (2 vols, Leiden, 1997).Google Scholar
Baku, G., ‘Der Streit um den Naturbegriff am Ende des 17. Jahrhunderts’, Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, 98 (1891), 162–90.Google Scholar
Barbour, R., English Epicures and Stoics: ancient legacies in early Stuart culture (Amherst, 1998).Google Scholar
Barbour, R., and Norbrook, D., ‘Introduction’, in Hutchinson, Lucy, The translation of Lucretius, eds., Barbour, R., Norbrook, D., and Zerbino, M. C. (Oxford, 2012), xv–clxvi.Google Scholar
Barducci, M., ‘Clement Barksdale, translator of Grotius: Erastianism and episocpacy in the English church, 1651–1658’, The Seventeenth Century, 25 (2010), 265–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barducci, M., ‘Political and ecclesiological contexts for the early English translations of Grotius’s De Veritate (1632–1686)’, Grotiana, 33 (2012), 70–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaude, P.-M., ‘L’accomplissement des prophéties chez Richard Simon’, Revue des Sciences Philosophiques et Théologiques, 60 (1976), 3–35.Google Scholar
Beck, R., ‘Thus spake not Zarathustra: Zoroastrian pseudepigrapha of the Greco-Roman world’, in Boyce, M. and Grenet, F., A history of Zoroastrianism, vol. iii: Zoroastrianism under Macedonian and Roman rule (Leiden, 1991), 491–565.Google Scholar
Beddard, R. A., ‘Restoration Oxford and the remaking of the Protestant establishment’, in The history of the University of Oxford, vol. iv: seventeenth-century Oxford, ed. Tyacke, N. (Oxford, 1997), 803–62.Google Scholar
Beddard, R. A., ‘Tory Oxford’, in The history of the University of Oxford, vol. iv: seventeenth-century Oxford, ed. Tyacke, N. (Oxford, 1997), 863–906.Google Scholar
van Beeck, F. J., ‘Introduction’, in The poems and translations of Sir Edward Sherburne, ed., van Beeck, F. J. (Assen, 1961), xvii–xlv.Google Scholar
Beiser, F. C., The sovereignty of reason: the defense of rationality in the early English Enlightenment (Princeton [NJ], 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belcher, T. W., ‘Memoir of John Stearne’, Dublin Journal of Medical Science, 39 (1865), 436–66.Google Scholar
Ben-Chaim, M., ‘Empowering lay belief: Robert Boyle and the moral economy of experiment’, Science in Context, 15 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben-Zaken, A., Cross-cultural scientific exchanges in the eastern Mediterranean, 1560–1660 (Baltimore [MD], 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benin, S. D., ‘The “cunning of God” and divine accommodation’, JHI, 45 (1984), 179–91.Google Scholar
Benin, S. D., The footprints of God: divine accommodation in Jewish and Christian thought (New York, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, J. A., ‘A study of Parentalia, with two unpublished letters of Sir Christopher Wren’, Annals of Science, 30 (1973), 129–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bercovitch, S., ‘Empedocles in the English Renaissance’, Studies in Philology, 65 (1968), 67–80.Google Scholar
van den Berg, J., ‘Menasseh ben Israel, Henry More and Johannes Hoornbeeck on the pre-existence of the soul’, in Menasseh ben Israel and his world, eds., Kaplan, Y., Méchoulan, H., and Popkin, R. H. (Leiden, 1989), 98–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van den Berg, J., ‘Grotius’ views on antichrist and apocalyptic thought in England’, in Hugo Grotius, theologian, eds., Nellen, H. J. M. and Rabbie, E. (Leiden, 1994), 169–84.Google Scholar
Bergemann, L., Ralph Cudworth—System Aus Transformation: Zur Naturphilosophie Der Cambridge Platonists Und Ihrer Methode (Transformationen Der Antike) (Berlin, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bianchi, D., ‘Some sources for a history of English Socinianism: a bibliography of 17th-century English Socinian writings’, Topoi, 4 (1985), 91–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bietenholz, P. G., ‘Sigismundus Gelenius of Prague, c. 1498–early 1554’, in Contemporaries of Erasmus: a biographical register of the Renaissance and Reformation, Vols i-iii, eds., Bietenholz, P. G. and Deutscher, T. B. (Toronto, 1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bietenholz, P. G., Daniel Zwicker, 1612–1678: peace, tolerance and God the One and only (Florence, 1997).Google Scholar
Birrell, T. A., ‘The reconstruction of the library of Isaac Casaubon’, in Hellinga: Festschrift, ed. van Uchelen, A. R. A. Croiset (Amsterdam, 1980), 59–68.Google Scholar
Birrell, T. A., ‘The library of Sir Edward Sherburne’, in The book trade and its customers, 1450–1900: historical essays for Robin Myers, eds., Hunt, A., Mandelbrote, G., and Shell, A. (Winchester, 1997), 189–204.Google Scholar
Black, S. B., ‘Marsham, John’, ODNB.Google Scholar
Blackwell, C., ‘Epicurus and Boyle, Leclerc and Locke: “Ideas” and their redefinition in Jacob Brucker’s Historia Philosophica Doctrinae de Ideis’, in Il vocabulario della Republique des lettres, terminologia filosofica e storia della filosofia, ed. Fattori, M. (Florence, 1997), 70–90.Google Scholar
Blackwell, C., ‘Thales philosophus: the beginning of philosophy as a discipline’, in History and the disciplines: the reclassification of knowledge in early-modern Europe, ed. Kelley, D. R. (Rochester, 1997), 61–8.Google Scholar
Blackwell, C., ‘Sturm, Morhof and Brucker vs. Aristotle: three eclectic natural philosophers view the Aristotelian method’, Method and order in Renaissance philosophy of nature, eds., Di Liscia, D. A., Kessler, E., and Methuen, C. (Aldershot, 1998), 49–77.Google Scholar
Blackwell, C., and Kusukawa, S., eds., Philosophy in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries: conversations with Aristotle (Aldershot, 1999).Google Scholar
Blair, A., ‘Mosaic physics and the search for a pious natural philosophy in the late Renaissance’, Isis 91 (2000), 32–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blau, A., ‘Uncertainty and the history of ideas’, History and Theory, 50 (2011), 358–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blau, J. L., The Christian interpretation of the Cabala in the Renaissance (New York, 1944).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blok, F. F., Isaac Vossius and his circle: his life until his farewell to Queen Christina of Sweden, trans. van Heertum, C. (Groningen, 2000 [Dutch orig.=1999]).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blom, F. J. M., ‘Lucas Holstenius (1596–1661) and England’, in Studies in seventeenth-century English literature, history and bibliography, eds., Janssens, G. A. M. and Aarts, F. G. A. M. (Amsterdam, 1984).Google Scholar
Blom, H., and Winkel, L., ‘Introduction’, in Grotius and the Stoa, eds., Blom, H. W. and Winkel, L. C. (Assen, 2004), 3–21.Google Scholar
Blum, P. R., ‘“Cognitio falsitatis vera est.” Benedictus Pererius critico della magia e della cabala’, in La magia nell’Europa moderna: tra antica sapienza e filosofia naturale, eds., Meroi, F. and Scapparone, E. (Florence, 2007), 345–62.Google Scholar
Blundell, B., Pierre Gassendi: from Aristotelianism to a new natural philosophy (Dordrecht, 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booth, E., ‘A Subtle and Mysterious Machine’: the medical world of Walter Charleton (1619–1707) (Dordrecht, 2005).Google Scholar
Boss, J. M. N., ‘“Doctrina de circulatione sanguinis haud immutat antiquam medendi methodum”: an unpublished manuscript (1662) by Francis Glisson (1597–1677) on implications of Harvey’s physiology’, Physis. Rivista Internazionale di Storia della Scienza, 20 (1978), 309–36.Google Scholar
Boss, J. M. N., ‘Helmont, Glisson, and the doctrine of the common reservoir in the seventeenth-century revolution in physiology’, BJHS, 16 (1983), 261–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bossier, F., ‘Traductions latines et influences du Commentaire In de Caelo des Simplikios’, in Simplicius, sa vie, son oeuvre, sa survie, ed. Hadot, I. (Berlin and New York, 1987), 298–325.Google Scholar
Bots, H., Hillenaar, H., Janssen, J., Van der Korst, J., and Van Lieshout, L., eds., De ‘Bibliothèque Universelle et Historique’ (1686–1693): een periodiek als trefpunt van geletterd Europa (Amsterdam, 1981).Google Scholar
Brach, J.-P., ‘Mathematical esotericism: some perspectives on Renaissance arithmology’, in Hermes in the academy, eds., Hanegraaff, W. J. and Pijnenburg, J. (Amsterdam, 2009), 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, D., The contribution of British writers between 1560 and 1830 to the interpretation of Revelation 13.16–18 (the number of the beast) (Tübingen, 1983).Google Scholar
Bravo, B., ‘Critice in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries and the rise of the notion of historical criticism’, in History of scholarship, eds., Ligota, C. and Quantin, J.-L. (Oxford, 2006), 135–96.Google Scholar
Breen, Q., ‘Introduction’, in Nizolio, M., De veris principiis et vera ratione philosophandi, ed. Breen, Q. (2 vols, Rome, 1955), i, i–lxxiv.Google Scholar
Bremer, F. J., ‘Mather, Samuel’, ODNB.Google Scholar
Brockliss, L., and Jones, C., The medical world of early modern France (Oxford, 1997).Google Scholar
Brogi, S., ‘Jean Le Clerc et l’Église anglicane’, in Les relations franco-anglaises aux XVIIe et XVIIIe siècles: périodiques et manuscrits clandestins, ed. Artigas-Menant, G. (Paris, 2007), 117–44.Google Scholar
Brooke, C., Philosophic pride: Stoicism and political thought from Lipsius to Rousseau (Princeton, 2012).Google Scholar
Browne, A., ‘J. B. van Helmont’s attack on Aristotle’, Annals of Science, 36 (1979), 575–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, C. C., ‘The mere numbers of Henry More’s Cabbala’, Studies in English Literature, 1500–1900, 10 (1970), 143–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchwald, J., and Feingold, M., Newton and the origins of civilization (Princeton, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnett, S. G., ‘Later Christian Hebraists’, in Hebrew Bible/Old Testament: the history of its interpretation, vol. ii: from the Renaissance to the Enlightenment, ed. Saebø, M. (Göttingen, 2008) ii, 785–801.Google Scholar
Burnham, F. B., ‘The More-Vaughan controversy: the revolt against philosophical enthusiasm’, JHI, 35 (1974), 33–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, W. E., ‘“Our lot is fallen into an age of wonders”: John Spencer and the controversy over prodigies in the early Restoration’, Albion, 27 (1995), 237–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, W. E., An age of wonders: prodigies, politics, and providence in England, 1657–1727 (Manchester, 2002).Google Scholar
Burns, W. E., ‘Glanvill, Joseph’, ODNB.Google Scholar
Burstein, S. M., ‘Images of Egypt in Greek historiography’, in Ancient Egyptian literature: history and forms, ed. Loperino, A. (Leiden, 1996), 591–604.Google Scholar
Burton, S. J. G., The hallowing of logic: the trinitarian method of Richard Baxter’s Methodus Theologiae (Leiden, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bylebyl, J. J., ‘Teaching Methodus medendi in the Renaissance’, in Galen’s method of healing, eds., Kudlien, F. and Durling, R. J. (Leiden, 1991), 157–89.Google Scholar
Campagnolo, M., ‘Entre Théodore de Bèze et Erasme de Rotterdam: Isaac Casaubon’, in Théodore de Bèze (1519–1605): Actes du colloque de Genève, ed. Backus, I. (Geneva, 2007), 195–217.Google Scholar
Campanini, S., ‘Le fonti ebraiche del De harmonia mundi di Francesco Zorzi’, Annali di Ca’Foscari, 38 (1999), 29–74.Google Scholar
Campanini, S., ‘Eine späte Apologie der Kabbala. Die Abdita divinae Cabalae Mysteria des Jacques Gaffarel’, in Topik und Tradition. Prozesse der Neuordnung von Wissensüberlieferungen des 13. bis 17. Jahrhunderts, eds., Frank, T., Kocher, U., and Tarnow, U. (Göttingen, 2007), 325–51.Google Scholar
Carabelli, G., Tolandiana: materiali bibliografici per lo studio dell’opera e della fortuna di John Toland (1670–1722) (Florence, 1975).Google Scholar
Carlin, L., ‘Boyle’s teleological mechanism and the myth of immanent teleology’, SHPS, 43 (2012), 54–63.Google Scholar
Carroll, R. T., The common sense philosophy of religion of Bishop Edward Stillingfleet (The Hague, 1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, H., A history of the Oxford University Press: to the year 1780 (Oxford, 1975).Google Scholar
Casini, P., ‘Newton: the Classical Scholia’, History of Science, 22 (1984), 1–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casini, P., ‘The Pythagorean myth: Copernicus to Newton’, in Copernico e la questione copernica in Italia, ed. Pepe, L. (Florence, 1996), 183–99.Google Scholar
Catana, L., The historiographical concept ‘system of philosophy’: its origin, nature, influence and legitimacy (Leiden, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catana, L., ‘The history of the history of philosophy, and the lost biographical tradition’, BJHP, 20 (2012), 619–25.Google Scholar
Cecon, K., ‘Robert Boyle’s experimental programme: some interesting examples of the use of subordinate cuases in chemistry and pneumatics’, Intellectual History Review, 25 (2015), 81–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Celenza, C. S., ‘Pythagoras in the Renaissance: the case of Marsilio Ficino’, Renaissance Quarterly, 52 (1999), 667–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chalmers, A., ‘The lack of excellency of Boyle’s mechanical philosophy’, SHPS, 24 (1993), 541–64.Google Scholar
Chalmers, A., ‘Experiment versus mechanical philosophy in the work of Robert Boyle: a reply to Anstey and Pyle’, SHPS, 33 (2002), 191–7.Google Scholar
Chalmers, A., ‘Boyle and the origins of modern chemistry: Newman tried in the fire’, SHPS, 41 (2010), 1–10.Google ScholarPubMed
Chalmers, A., ‘Understanding science through its history: a response to Newman’, SHPS, 42 (2011), 150–3.Google Scholar
Chalmers, A., ‘Intermediate causes and explanations: the key to understanding the scientific revolution’, SHPS, 43 (2012), 551–62.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, J. S., ‘Long, Thomas’, ODNB.Google Scholar
Champion, J. A. I., The pillars of priestcraft shaken: the Church of England and its enemies 1660–1730 (Cambridge, 1992).Google Scholar
Champion, J. A. I., ‘Legislators, impostors, and the politic origins of religion: English theories of “imposture” from Stubbe to Toland’, in Heterodoxy, Spinozism, and free thought in early-eighteenth-century Europe: studies on the Traité des trois imposteurs, eds., Berti, S., Charles-Daubert, F., and Popkin, R. H. (Dordrecht, 1996), 333–56.Google Scholar
Champion, J. A. I., ‘Richard Simon and biblical criticism in Restoration England’, in Everything connects: in conference with Richard Popkin, eds., Force, J. and Katz, D. (Leiden, 1999), 37–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Champion, J. A. I., ‘Introduction’, in Toland, John, Nazarenus, ed. Champion, J. A. I. (Oxford, 1999).Google Scholar
Champion, J. A. I., ‘“I remember a Mahometan story of Ahmed ben Edris”: freethinking uses of Islam from Stubbe to Toland’, Al-Qantara, 31 (2010), 443–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, M., and Kassler, J. C., Roger North: materials for a chronology of his writings (Kensington [NSW], 1989).Google Scholar
Chapman, A., ‘Edmond Halley’s use of historical evidence in the advancement of science’, NRRS, 48 (1994), 167–91.Google Scholar
Chen, B., ‘Politics and letters: Gisbert Cuper as servant of two republics’, in Double agents: cultural and political brokerage in early modern Europe, eds., Keblusek, M. and Noldus, B. V. (Leiden, 2011), 71–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chevalier, P., ed., Dionysiaca: Recueil donnant l’ensemble des traductions latines des ouvrages attribués au Denys de l’Aréopage (2 vols, Paris, 1937–50).Google Scholar
Christianson, P., Discourse on history, law, and governance in the public career of John Selden, 1610–1635 (Toronto, 1996).Google Scholar
Churton, E., ‘Memoir of the life and writings of John Pearson’, in The minor theological works of John Pearson, ed. Churton, E. (2 vols, Oxford, 1844), i, xiii–cxxxvi.Google Scholar
Cifoletti, G., ‘The creation of the history of algebra in the sixteenth century’, in L’Europe mathématique: histoires, mythes, identités, eds., Goldstein, C., Gray, J., and Ritter, J. (Paris, 1996), 123–44.Google Scholar
Clark, S., ‘Gaule, John’, ODNB.Google Scholar
Clarke, D. M., and Wilson, C., eds., The Oxford handbook of philosophy in early modern Europe (Oxford, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claydon, T., ‘Latitudinarianism and apocalyptism in the worldview of Gilbert Burnet’, HJ, 51 (2008), 577–97.Google Scholar
Cleary, J. J., Aristotle and mathematics: aporetic method in cosmology and metaphysics (Leiden, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clericuzio, A., ‘A redefinition of Boyle’s chemistry and corpuscular philosophy’, Annals of Science, 47 (1990), 561–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clericuzio, A., ‘From van Helmont to Boyle: a study of the transmission of Helmontian chemical and medical theories in seventeenth-century England’, BJHS, 26 (1993), 303–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clericuzio, A., ‘Carneades and the chemists: a study of The sceptical chymist and its impact on seventeenth-century chemisty’, in Robert Boyle recosidered, ed. Hunter, M. (Cambridge, 1994), 79–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clericuzio, A., ‘L’atomisme de Gassendi et la philosophie corpusculaire de Boyle’, in Gassendi et l’Europe (1592–1792), ed. Murr, S. (Paris, 1997), 227–35.Google Scholar
Clericuzio, A., Elements, principles and corpuscles. A study of atomism and chemistry in the seventeenth century (Dordrecht, 2000).Google Scholar
Clericuzio, A., ‘Gassendi, Charleton and Boyle on matter and motion’, in Late medieval and early modern corpuscular matter theories, eds., Lüthy, C., Murdoch, J. E., and Newman, W. (Leiden, 2001), 467–83.Google Scholar
Clericuzio, A., ‘Maynwaring, Everard’, ODNB.Google Scholar
Clericuzio, A., ‘Sherley, Thomas’, ODNB.Google Scholar
Clucas, S., ‘The atomism of the Cavendish circle: a reappraisal’, The Seventeenth Century, 9 (1994), 247–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coffey, J., ‘A ticklish business: defining heresy and orthodoxy in the puritan revolution’, in Heresy, literature and politics in early modern English culture, eds., Loewenstein, D. and Marshall, J. (Cambridge, 2006), 108–36.Google Scholar
Cohen, E. H., and Ross, J. S., ‘The commonplace book of Edmond Halley’, NRRS, 40 (1985), 1–40.Google Scholar
Cohen, I. B., ‘Hypotheses in Newton’s philosophy’, Physis. Rivista Internazionale di Storia della Scienza, 8 (1966), 163–84.Google Scholar
Cole, F. J., ‘Henry Power on the circulation of blood’, Journal of the History of Medicine, 12 (1657), 291–324.Google Scholar
Coleman-Norton, P. R., ‘The authorship of the Epistola de Indicis Gentibus et de Bragmanibus’, Classical Philology, 21 (1926), 154–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, K. B., Cosmogonies of our fathers: some theories of the seventeenth and the eighteenth centuries (New York, 1934).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cope, J. I., ‘The cupri-cosmits: Glanvill on latitutdinarian anti-enthusiasm’, Huntington Library Quarterly, 17 (1954), 269–86.Google Scholar
Corneanu, S., Regimens of the mind: Boyle, Locke, and the cultura animi tradition (Chicago, 2012).Google Scholar
Cornelius, P., Languages in seventeenth- and early eighteenth-century imaginary voyages (Geneva, 1965).Google Scholar
Cornwall, R. D., ‘Nicholls, William’, ODNB.Google Scholar
Condren, C., The language of politics in seventeenth-century England (London, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Condren, C., Argument and authority in early modern England (Cambridge, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, H. J., The decline of the old medical regime in Stuart London (Ithaca, 1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, H. J., ‘The Society of Chemical Physicians, the new philosophy, and the Restoration court’, Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 61 (1987), 61–77.Google Scholar
Cook, H. J., ‘Physicians and the new philosophy: Henry Stubbe and the virtuosi-physicians’, in The medical revolution in the seventeenth century, eds., French, R. and Wear, A. (Cambridge, 1989), 246–71.Google Scholar
Cook, H. J., ‘The new philosophy and medicine in seventeenth-century England’, in Reappraisals of the scientific revolution, eds., Lindberg, D. C. and Westman, R. S. (Cambridge, 1990), 397–436.Google Scholar
Copenhaver, B. P., ‘Jewish theologies of space in the scientific revolution: Henry More, Joseph Raphson, Isaac Newton and their predecessors’, Annals of Science, 37 (1980), 489–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copenhaver, B. P., ‘Introduction’, in Hermetica: the Greek Corpus Hermeticum and the Latin Asclepius, ed. and trans. Copenhaver, B. P. (Cambridge, 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copenhaver, B. P., ‘Did science have a Renaissance?’, Isis, 83 (1993), 387–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costello, W. T., The scholastic curriculum at early seventeenth century Cambridge (Cambridge [MA], 1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coudert, A. P., ‘A Cambridge Platonist’s Kabbalist nightmare’, JHI, 36 (1975), 633–52.Google Scholar
Coudert, A. P., ‘Henry More, the Kabbalah, and the Quakers’, in Philosophy, science, and religion in England, 1640–1700, eds., Kroll, R., Ashcraft, R., and Zagorin, P. (Cambridge, 1992), 31–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coudert, A. P., The impact of the Kabbalah in the seventeenth century: the life and thought of Francis Mercury van Helmont (1614–1698) (Leiden, 1999).Google Scholar
Coughlan, P., ‘Natural history and historical nature: the project for a natural history of Ireland’, in Samuel Hartlib and universal Reformation: studies in intellectual communication, eds., Greengrass, M., Leslie, M., and Raylor, T. (Cambridge, 1994), 298–318.Google Scholar
Cowie, B. W., ‘Beveridge, William’, ODNB.Google Scholar
Cragg, G. R., From Puritanism to the age of reason: a study of changes in religious thought within the Church of England (Cambridge, 1950).Google Scholar
Cranz, F. E., ‘Alexander Aphrodisiensis’, CTC, i, 77–135, ii, 411–22, vii, 296–8 (addenda by Vecce, C.).Google Scholar
Crocker, R., ‘Mysticism and enthusiasm in Henry More’, in Henry More: tercentenary studies, ed. Hutton, S. (Dordrecht, 1990), 137–55.Google Scholar
Crocker, R., Henry More, 1614–1687: a biography of the Cambridge Platonist (Dordrecht, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cromartie, A., Sir Matthew Hale, 1609–1676: law, religion and natural philosophy (Cambridge, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowther, K. M., ‘Sacred philosophy, secular theology: the Mosaic physics of Levinus Lemnius (1505-1568) and Francisco Valles (1524–1592)’, in Nature and scripture in the Abrahamic religions, eds., van der Meer, J. M. and Mandelbrote, S. (2 vols, Leiden, 2008), i, 397–428.Google Scholar
Crump, G. M., ‘Thomas Stanley’s manuscript of his poems and translations’, Transactions of the Cambridge Bibliographical Society II.5 (1958), 359–65.Google Scholar
Crump, G. M., ‘Introduction’, in The poems and translations of Thomas Stanley, ed. Crump, G. M. (Oxford, 1962), xxi–lxiv.Google Scholar
Cunningham, A., ‘Thomas Sydenham: epidemics, experiment and the “Good Old Cause”’, in The medical revolution in the seventeenth century, eds., French, R. and Wear, A. (Cambridge, 1989), 164–90.Google Scholar
Cunningham, A., The anatomical Renaissance: the resurrection of the anatomical projects of the ancients (Aldershot, 1997), 167–90.Google Scholar
Cunningham, A., ‘The transformation of Hippocrates in seventeenth-century Britain’, in Reinventing Hippocrates, ed. Cantor, D. (Aldershot, 2002), 91–116.Google Scholar
Curran, B., ‘The Renaissance afterlife of ancient Egypt (1400–1650)’, in The wisdom of Egypt: changing visions through the ages, eds., Ucko, P. and Champion, T. (London, 2003), 101–32.Google Scholar
Curran, B., The Egyptian Renaissance: the afterlife of ancient Egypt in early modern Italy (Chicago, 2007).Google Scholar
Curran, B., and Grafton, A., ‘A fifteenth-century site report on the Vatican obelisk’, JWCI, 58 (1995), 234–48.Google Scholar
Dales, R. C., ‘The de-animation of the heavens in the middle ages’, JHI, 41 (1980), 531–50.Google Scholar
Dan, J., ‘Menasseh ben Israel: attitude towards the Zohar and Lurianic Kabbalah’, in Menasseh ben Israel and his world, eds., Kaplan, Y., Méchoulan, H., and Popkin, R. H. (Leiden, 1989), 199–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dannenfeldt, K. H., ‘Hermetica philosophica’, CTC, i, 137–50, ii, p. 423, iii, 425 (addenda by D’Alverny, M.-T.).Google Scholar
Dannenfeldt, K. H., ‘Oracula Chaldaica’, CTC, 157–64, vii, 326–29 (addenda by Klutstein, I.).Google Scholar
Dannenfeldt, K. H., ‘The pseudo-Zoroastrian oracles in the Renaissance’, Studies in the Renaissance, 4 (1957), 7–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dannenfeldt, K. H., ‘Egypt and the Egyptian antiquities in the Renaissance’, Studies in the Renaissance, 6 (1959), 7–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, C. S. L., ‘The youth and education of Christopher Wren’, English Historical Review, 123 (2008), 1–28.Google Scholar
De Smet, R., and Verhelst, K., ‘Newton’s Scholium Generale: the Platonic and Stoic Legacy—Philo, Justus Lipsius and the Cambridge Platonists’, History of Science, 39 (2001), 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dear, P., Discipline and experience: the mathematical way in the scientific revolution (Chicago, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dear, P., ‘Method and the study of nature’, in The Cambridge history of seventeenth-century philosophy, eds., Garber, D. and Ayers, M. (2 vols, 1998), i, 147–77.Google Scholar
Dear, P., ‘Circular argument: Descartes’ vortices and their crafting as explanations of gravity’, in The science of nature in the seventeenth century, eds., Anstey, P. R. and Schuster, J. A. (Leiden, 2005), 81–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dear, P., ‘What is the history of science the history of? Early modern roots of the ideology of modern science’, Isis, 96 (2005), 390–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deason, G. B., ‘Reformation theology and the mechanistic conception of nature’, in God and nature: historical essays on the encounter between Christianity and science, eds., Lindberg, D. C. and Numbers, R. L. (Berkley and Los Angeles, 1986), 167–92.Google Scholar
Debus, A. G., ‘An Elizabethan history of medical chemistry’, Annals of Science, 18 (1964), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debus, A. G., ‘Mathematics and nature in the chemical texts of the Renaissance’, Ambix, 15 (1968), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debus, A. G., ‘Introduction’, in Science and education in the seventeenth century: the Webster-Ward debate (New York, 1970).Google Scholar
Debus, A. G., ‘Parcelsian medicine: Noah Biggs and the problem of medical reform’, in Medicine in seventeenth century England, ed. Debus, A. G. (Berkeley, 1974), 33–48.Google Scholar
Debus, A. G., The chemical philosophy: Paracelsian science and medicine in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries (2 vols, New York, 1977).Google Scholar
Debus, A. G., ‘Thomas Sherley’s Philosophical essay (1672): Helmontian mechanism as the basis of a new philosophy’, Ambix, 27 (1980), 124–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deitz, L., ‘“Falsissima est ergo haec de triplici substantia Aristotelis doctrina”. A sixteenth-century critic of Aristotle—Francesco Patrizi da Cherso on privation, form, and matter’, ESM, 2 (1997), 227–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deitz, L., ‘Francesco Patrizi da Cherso’s criticism of Aristotle’s logic’, Vivarium, 45 (2007), 113–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denis, P., and Rott, J., Jean Morély (ca 1524–1594) et l’Utopie d’une démocratie dans l’eglise (Geneva, 1993).Google Scholar
Dennehy, M., and Ramond, C., eds., La philosophie naturelle de Robert Boyle (Paris, 2009).Google Scholar
Des Chene, D., Physiologia: natural philosophy in late Aristotelian and Cartesian thought (Ithaca, 1996).Google Scholar
Deuse, W., ‘Celsus im Prooemium von “De medicina”: Römische Aneignung griechischer Wissenschaft’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt, 37 (1993), 819–41.Google Scholar
Dewhurst, K., Dr Thomas Sydenham (1624–1689): his life and original writings (Berkeley, 1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewhurst, K., ‘Introduction’, in Richard Lower’s ‘Vindicatio’. A defence of the experimental method (Oxford, 1983).Google Scholar
Di Liscia, D. A., Kessler, E., and Methuen, C., eds., Method and order in Renaissance philosophy of nature (Aldershot, 1998).Google Scholar
Diestel, L., Geschichte des Alten Testamentes in der christlichen kirche (Jena, 1869).Google Scholar
Dijkstra, J. H. F., ‘Mysteries of the Nile? Joseph Scaliger and ancient Egypt’, Aries. Journal for the Study of Western Esotericism, 9 (2009), 59–82.Google Scholar
Dobbs, B. J. T., ‘Studies in the natural philosophy of Sir Kenelm Digby, I’, Ambix, 18 (1971), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobbs, B. J. T., ‘Studies in the natural philosophy of Sir Kenelm Digby, II’, Ambix, 20 (1973), 143–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dobbs, B. J. T., ‘Newton’s Commentary on The Emerald Tablet of Hermes Trismegistus: its scientific and theological significance’, in Hermeticism and the Renaissance, eds., Merkel, I. and Debus, A. G. (Washington, 1988), 182–91.Google Scholar
Dockrill, D., ‘The authority of the fathers in the great trinitarian debates of the 1690s’, Studia Patristica, 18 (1990), 335–47.Google Scholar
Dockrill, D., ‘The heritage of patristic Platonism in seventeenth-century philosophical theology’, in The Cambridge Platonists in philosophical context, eds., Rogers, G. A. J., Vienne, J. M., and Zarka, Y. C. (Dordrecht, 1997), 55–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dockrill, D., and Lee, J. M., ‘Reflections on an episode in Cambridge latitudinarianism: Henry More’s Epistle Dedicatory to Gilbert Sheldon of his Enchiridion Metaphysicum’, in Tradition and traditions: prudentia, eds., Dockrill, D. and Tanner, R. G. (London, 1994), 207–23.Google Scholar
Dod, B. G., ‘Aristoteles Latinus’, in The Cambridge history of later medieval philosophy: from the rediscovery of Aristotle to the disintegration of scholasticism, 1100–1600, eds., Kretzmann, N., Kenny, A. and Pinborg, J. (Cambridge, 1982), 45–79.Google Scholar
Domski, M., ‘The constructible and the intelligible in Newton’s philosophy of geometry’, Philosophy of Science, 70 (2003), 1114–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domski, M., ‘Newton as historically-minded philosopher’, in Discourse on a new method: reinvigorating the marriage of history and philosophy of science, eds., Dickson, M. and Domski, M. (LaSalle, 2010), 65–90.Google Scholar
Donini, P., ‘The history of the concept of eclecticism’, in The question of ‘eclecticism’, eds., Long, A. A. and Dillon, J. M. (Berkeley, 1988), 15–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorandi, T., Laertiana. Capitoli sulla tradizione manoscritta e sulla storia del testo delle Vite dei filosofi di Diogene Laerzio (Berlin, 2009).Google Scholar
Droge, A. J., Homer or Moses? Early Christian interpetations of the history of culture (Tübingen, 1989).Google Scholar
Droixhe, D., ‘La crise de l’hébreu langue-mère au XVIIe siècle’, in La république des lettres et l’histoire du judaïsme antique: XVIe-XVIIIe siècles, eds. Grell, C. and Laplanche, F. (Paris, 1992), 65–99.Google Scholar
Drouin, S., Théologie ou libertinage? L’exégèse allégorique à l’âge des Lumières (Paris, 2010).Google Scholar
Ducheyne, S., ‘The General Scholium: some notes on Newton’s published and unpublished endeavours’, Lias, 33 (2010), 223–74.Google Scholar
Ducheyne, S., The main business of natural philosophy: Isaac Newton’s natural-philosophical methodology (Dordrecht, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffy, E., ‘Primitive Christianity revived: religious renewal in Augustan England’, in Renaissance and renewal in Christian history, ed., Baker, D. (Oxford, 1977), 287–300.Google Scholar
Dunlop, K., ‘What geometry postulates: Newton and Barrow on the relationship of mathematics to nature’, in Interpreting newton: critical essays, eds., Janiak, A. and Schliesser, E. (Cambridge, 2012), 69–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupront, A., Pierre-Daniel Huet et l’exégèse comparatiste au xviie siècle (Paris, 1930).Google Scholar
Durling, R. J., ‘A chronological census of Renaissance editions and translations of Galen’, JWCI, 24 (1961), 230–305.Google Scholar
Dweck, Y., The scandal of Kabbalah: Leon Modena, Jewish mysticism, early modern Venice (Princeton, 2011).Google Scholar
Edwards, M., ‘Ammonius, teacher of Origen’, Journal of Ecclesiastical History, 44 (1993), 169–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Eijk, P. J., Diocles of Carystus: a collection of the fragments with translation and commentary (2 vols, Leiden, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellenzweig, S., The fringes of belief: English literature, ancient heresy, and the politics of freethinking, 1660–1760 (Stanford, 2008).Google Scholar
Elmer, P., The library of Dr. John Webster: the making of a seventeenth-century radical (London, 1986).Google Scholar
Elukin, J., ‘Maimonides and the rise and fall of the Sabians: explaining Mosaic laws and the limits of Scholarship’, JHI, 63 (2001), 619–37.Google Scholar
Enenkel, K. A. E., ‘The making of 16th-century mythography: Giraldi’s Syntagma de Musis (1507, 1511, and 1539), De deis gentium historia (ca. 1500–1548) and Julien de Havrech’s De cognominibus deorum gentilium (1541)’, Humanistica Lovaniensia, 51 (2002), 9–53.Google Scholar
Farmer, S. A., Syncretism in the West: Pico’s 900 theses (1486). The evolution of traditional religious and philosophical systems (Tempe, 1998).Google Scholar
Fattori, M., ‘Signum in Francis Bacon: dal mondo del sacro al mondo degli uomini’, in Signum: IX colloquio internazionale del Lessico Intellecttuale Europeo, ed. Bianchi, M. (Florence, 1999), 235–61.Google Scholar
Feingold, M., The mathematicians’ apprenticeship: science, universities and society in England, 1560–1640 (Cambridge, 1984).Google Scholar
Feingold, M., ‘Isaac Barrow: divine, scholar, mathematician’, Before Newton: the life and times of Isaac Barrow (Cambridge, 1990), 1–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feingold, M., ‘Patrons and professors: the origins and motives for the endowment of University Chairs—in particular the Laudian Professorship of Arabic’, in The ‘Arabick’, interest of the natural philosophers in the seventeenth-century England, ed. Russell, G. A. (Leiden, 1994), 109–27.Google Scholar
Feingold, M., ‘The humanities’, in The history of the University of Oxford, vol. iv: seventeenth-century Oxford, ed. Tyacke, N. (Oxford, 1997), 211–357.Google Scholar
Feingold, M., ‘The mathematical sciences and the new philosophies’, in The history of the University of Oxford, vol. iv: seventeenth-century Oxford, ed. Tyacke, N. (Oxford, 1997), 359–448.Google Scholar
Feingold, M., ‘Oriental studies’, in The history of the University of Oxford, vol. iv: seventeenth-century Oxford, ed. Tyacke, N. (Oxford, 1997), 449–504.Google Scholar
Feingold, M., ‘Aristotle and the English universities in the seventeenth century: a re-evaluation’, in European universities in the age of Reformation and Counter-Reformation, ed. Robinson-Hammerstein, H. (Dublin, 1998), 149–68.Google Scholar
Feingold, M., ‘Mathematicians and naturalists: Sir Isaac Newton and the Royal Society’, in Isaac Newton’s natural philosophy, eds. Buchwald, J. Z. and Cohen, I. B. (Cambridge [MA], 2001), 77–102.Google Scholar
Feingold, M., ‘The origins of the Royal Society revisited’, The practice of reform in health, medicine, and science, 1500–2000: essays for Charles Webster, eds. Pelling, M. and Mandelbrote, S. (Aldershot, 2005), 167–83.Google Scholar
Feingold, M., ‘“Experimental philosophy”: the history and meaning of a concept’ (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Feingold, M., and Gouk, P. M., ‘An early critic of Bacon’s Sylva sylvarum: Edmund Chilmead’s treatise on sound’, Annals of Science, 40 (1983), 139–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feisenberger, H. A., ed., Sale catalogues of libraries of eminent persons: vol. xi: scientists (London, 1975).Google Scholar
Feldhay, R., ‘The use and abuse of mathematical entities: Galileo and the Jesuits revisited’, in The Cambridge companion to Galileo, ed. Machamer, P. (Cambridge, 1998), 80–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrier, R. W., A journey to Persia: Jean Chardin’s portrait of a seventeenth-century empire (London, 1996).Google Scholar
Findlen, P., Possessing nature: museums, collecting and scientific culture in early modern Italy (Berkeley, 1994).Google Scholar
Finocchiaro, M. A., ‘The biblical argument against Copernicanism and the limitation of biblical authority: Ingoli, Foscarini, Galileo, Campanella’, in Nature and scripture in the Abrahamic religions, eds., van der Meer, J. M. and Mandelbrote, S. (2 vols, Leiden, 2008), i, 627–64.Google Scholar
Firby, N. K., European travellers and their perceptions of Zoroastrians in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries (Berlin, 1988).Google Scholar
Fisch, H., ‘The scientist as priest: a note on Robert Boyle’s natural theology’, Isis, 44 (1953), 252–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, S., ‘Gassendi’s atomist account of generation and heredity in plants and animals’, Perspectives on Science, 11 (2003), 484–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floridi, L., Sextus Empiricus: the transmission and recovery of Pyrrhonism (Oxford, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flower, M., ‘Thomas Stanley (1525–1678): a bibliography of his writings in prose and verse, 1647–1743’, Transactions of the Cambridge Bibliographical Society, 1 (1950), 138–72.Google Scholar
Force, J., ‘Newton, the Lord God of Israel and knowledge of nature’, in Jewish Christians and Christian Jews (Dordrecht, 1993), 131–58.Google Scholar
Forrester, J. M., and Henry, J., ‘Introduction’, in Fernel, Jean, On the hidden causes of things, eds. and trans. Forrester, J. M. and Henry, J. (Leiden, 2005 [1st edn=1548]).Google Scholar
Foster, M., ‘Sir Kenelm Digby as man of religion and thinker’, Downside Review, 106 (1988), 35–58, 101–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fouke, D. C., The enthusiastical concerns of Dr. Henry More: religious meaning and the psychology of delusion (Leiden, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowden, G., The Egyptian Hermes: a historical approach to the late pagan mind (Cambridge, 1986).Google Scholar
Fowler, C. F., Descartes on the human soul: philosophy and the demands of Christian doctrine (Dordrecht, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraenkel, E., ‘Prolegomena’, in Aeschylus, , Agamemnon, ed. Fraenkel, E. (3 vols, Oxford, 1959).Google Scholar
Frank, G., Leinkauf, T., and Wriedt, M., eds., Die Patristik in der frühen Neuzeit: Die Relektüre der Kirchenväter in den Wissenschaften des 15. bis 18. Jahrhundert (Stuttgart, 2006).Google Scholar
Frank, R. G., ‘The John Ward diaries: mirror of seventeenth century science and medicine’, Journal of the History of Medicine, 29 (1974), 147–79.Google Scholar
Frank, R. G., Harvey and the Oxford physiologists: a study of scientific ideas (Berkeley, 1980).Google Scholar
Frank, R. G., ‘Thomas Willis and his circle: brain and mind in seventeenth-century medicine’, in The languages of psyche: mind and body in enlightenment thought, ed. Rousseau, G. S. (Oxford, 1990), 107–40.Google Scholar
Frank, R. G., ‘Medicine’, in The history of the University of Oxford, vol. iv: seventeenth-century Oxford, ed. Tyacke, N. (Oxford, 1997), 507–58.Google Scholar
French, R., Medicine before science: the business of medicine from the middle ages to the enlightenment (Cambridge, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fried, M. N., Edmond Halley’s reconstruction of the lost book of Apollonius’s Conics (Dordrecht, 2011).Google Scholar
Friedman, J., ‘The myth of Jewish antiquity: new Christians and Christian-Hebraica in early modern Europe’, in Jewish Christians and Christian Jews: from the Renaissance to the enlightenment, eds., Popkin, R. H. and Weiner, G. M. (Dordrecht, 1994), 35–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fück, J., Die arabischen Studien in Europa bis den Anfang des 20. Jahrhunderts (Leipzig, 1955).Google Scholar
Fumaroli, M., ‘Temps de croissance et temps de corruptions: des deux Antiquités dans l’érudition jésuite française du XVIIe siècle’, XVIIe siècle, 131 (1981), 149–68.Google Scholar
Fumaroli, M., ‘Les Abeilles et les araignées’, in La querelle des ancients et des modernes, ed. Lecoq, A.-M. (Paris, 2001), 7–218.Google Scholar
Gaab, H., Leich, P., and Löffladt, G., eds., Johann Christoph Sturm (1635–1703) (Frankfurt, 2004).Google Scholar
Gabbey, A., ‘Philosophia Cartesiana triumphata: Henry More (1646–1671)’, in Problems of Cartesianism, eds., Lennon, T. M., Nicholas, J. M., and Davis, J. W. (Kingston, 1982), 171–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabbey, A., ‘The Principia: a treatise on “mechanics”?’, in The investigation of difficult things, eds., Harman, P. M. and Shapiro, A. E. (Cambridge, 1992), 305–22.Google Scholar
Gabbey, A., ‘Between ars and philosphia naturalis: reflections on the historiography of early modern mechanics’, in Renaissance and revolution: humanists, scholars, craftsmen and natural philosophers in early modern Europe (Cambridge, 1993), 133–45.Google Scholar
Gabriel, F., ‘L’ordo alexandrine: Sa’id ibn Batriq, Selden, et la hiérarchie ecclésiale. De l’Orient chrétien à l’ecclésiologie primitive’, Annuaire de l’Institut Michel Villey, 3 (2011), 419–50.Google Scholar
Gabrieli, V., Sir Kenelm Digby, un ingelse italianato nell’età della controriforma (Rome, 1957).Google Scholar
Galtier, P., ‘Petau et la Préface de son De Trinitate’, Recherches de Science Religieuse, 21 (1931), 462–76.Google Scholar
Ganzenmüller, W., ‘Wandlungen in der geschichtlichen Betrachtung der Alchemie’, Chymia, 3 (1950), 143–54.Google Scholar
Garber, D. and Ayers, M., eds., The Cambridge history of seventeenth-century philosophy (2 vols, Cambridge, 1998).Google Scholar
Garrison, J. W., ‘Newton and the relation of mathematics to natural philosophy’, JHI, 48 (1987), 609–27.Google Scholar
Gascoigne, J., Cambridge in the age of the enlightenment: science, religion and politics from the Restoration to the French Revolution (Cambridge, 1988).Google Scholar
Gascoigne, J., ‘The wisdom of the Egyptians and the secularisation of history in the age of Newton’, in The uses of antiquity: the scientific revolution and the classical tradition, ed. Gaukroger, S. (Dordrecht, 1991), 171–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gatti, H., ‘Frances Yates’s Hermetic Renaissance in the documents held in the Warburg Institute archive’, Aries, 2 (2002), 193–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaukroger, S., Francis Bacon and the transformation of early modern philosophy (Cambridge, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaukroger, S., The emergence of a scientific culture: science and the shaping of modernity, 1210–1685 (Oxford, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gause, A., ‘Hammond, William’, ODNB.Google Scholar
Gibbons, B. J., ‘Lee, Francis’, ODNB.Google Scholar
Gigante, M., ‘Ambrogio Traversai interprete di Diogene Laerzio’, in Ambrogio Traversari nel VI centenario della nascita (Florence, 1988), 367–459.Google Scholar
Giglioni, G., ‘Anatomist atheist? The “hylozoistic” foundations of Francis Glisson’s anatomical research’, in Religio medici: medicine and religion in seventeenth century England, eds., Grell, O.P. and Cunningham, A. (Aldershot, 1996), 115–35.Google Scholar
Giglioni, G., ‘Francis Glisson’s notion of confoederatio naturae in the context of hylozoistic corpuscularianism’, Revue d’histoire des sciences, 55 (2002), 239–62.Google Scholar
Giglioni, G., ‘Glisson, Francis’, ODNB.Google Scholar
Giglioni, G., ‘The cosmoplastic system of the universe: Ralph Cudworth on Stoic naturalism’, Revue d’histoire des sciences, 61/2 (2008), 313–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillespie, S., ‘Lucretius in the English Renaissance’, in The Cambridge companion to Lucretius, eds., Gillespie, S. and Hardie, P. (Cambridge, 2007), 242–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gingerich, O., An annotated census of Copenicus’ ‘De revolutionibus’ (Nuremberg, 1543 and Basel, 1566) (Leiden, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glawe, W., Die Hellenisierung des Christentums in der Geschichte der Theologie von Luther bis auf die Gegenwart (Berlin, 1912).Google Scholar
Goldgar, A., Impolite Learning: conduct and community in the republic of letters, 1680–1750 (New Haven and London, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldie, M., ‘The Cambridge Platonists’, ODNB.Google Scholar
Goodchild, P., ‘“No phantasticall Utopia, but a reall place”: John Evelyn, John Beale and Backbury Hill, Herefordshire’, Garden History, 19 (1991), 105–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goulding, R., Defending Hypatia: Ramus, Savile, and the Renaissance rediscovery of mathematical history (Dordrecht, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grafton, A., ‘Joseph Scaliger and historical chronology: the rise and fall of a discipline’, History and Theory, 14 (1975), 156–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grafton, A., ‘Rhetoric, philology and Egyptomania in the 1570s: J. J. Scaliger’s invective against M. Guilandinus’ papyrus’, JWCI, 52 (1979), 167–94.Google Scholar
Grafton, A., ‘Protestant versus prophet: Isaac Casaubon on Hermes Trismegistus’, JWCI, 46 (1983), 78–93.Google Scholar
Grafton, A., ‘The availability of ancient works’, in The Cambridge history of Renaissance philosophy, eds., Schmitt, C. B. and Skinner, Q. (Cambridge, 1988), 767–91.Google Scholar
Grafton, A., ‘Barrow as Scholar’, in Before Newton: the life and times of Isaac Barrow, ed. Feingold, M. (Cambridge, 1990), 291–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grafton, A., Defenders of the text: the traditions of scholarship in an age of science, 1450–1800 (Cambridge [MA], 1991).Google Scholar
Grafton, A., ‘Joseph Scaliger et l’histoire du Judaïsme Hellénistique’, in La république des letters et l’histoire du Judaïsme antique, XVIe-XVIIe siècles, eds., Grell, C. and Laplanche, F. (Paris, 1992), 51–63.Google Scholar
Grafton, A., ‘The new science and the traditions of humanism’, in The Cambridge companion to Renaissance humanism, ed. Kraye, J. (Cambridge, 1996), 203–23.Google Scholar
Grafton, A., ‘From apotheosis to analysis: some late Renaissance histories of classical astronomy’, in History and the disciplines: the reclassification of knowledge, ed. Kelley, D. R. (Rochester, 1997), 261–76.Google Scholar
Grafton, A., ‘Kircher’s chronology’, in Athanasius Kircher: the last man who knew everything, ed. Findlen, P. (New York and London, 2004), 171–87.Google Scholar
Grafton, A., What was history? The art of history in early modern Europe (Cambridge, 2007).Google Scholar
Grafton, A., ‘Isaac Vossius, chronologer’, in Isaac Vossius (1618–1689): between science and scholarship, eds., Jorink, E. and van Miert, D. (Leiden, 2012), 43–84.Google Scholar
Grafton, A., and Weinberg, J., I have always loved the Holy Tongue: Isaac Casaubon, the Jews, and a forgotten chapter in Renaissance scholarship (Cambridge [MA], 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, E., Much ado about nothing: theories of space and vacuum from the middle ages to the scientific revolution (Cambridge, 1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, J. N., ‘Erasmus’ Modus orandi deum, Origen’s De oratione, and Cambridge Trinity College MS 194 (B.8.10)’, Humanistica Lovaniensia, 48 (1998), 42–59.Google Scholar
Greaves, R. L., ‘Pemble, William’, ODNB.Google Scholar
Greene, R. A., ‘Henry More and Robert Boyle on the spirit of nature’, JHI, 32 (1962), 451–74.Google Scholar
Greene, R. A., ‘Whichcote, the candle of the Lord and synderesis’, JHI, 51 (1991), 617–44.Google Scholar
Greene, R. A., and MacCallum, H., ‘Introduction’, in An elegant and learned discourse of the light of nature, eds., Greene, R. A. and MacCallum, H. (Toronto, 1971).Google Scholar
Greengrass, M., Leslie, M., Raylor, T., Samuel Hartlib and universal Reformation: studies in intellectual communication (Cambridge, 1994).Google Scholar
Gregory, T., ‘Studi sull’atomismo del Seicento’, in Giornale critico della filosofia italiana, 43 (1964), 38–65; 45 (1966), 44–63; 46 (1967), 528–41.Google Scholar
Greig, M., ‘The reasonableness of Christianity? Gilbert Burnet and the trinitarian controversy of the 1690s’, Journal of Ecclesiastical History, 44 (1993), 631–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greig, M., ‘Gilbert Burnet and the problem of non-conformity in Restoration Scotland and England’, Canadian Journal of History, 32 (1997), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greig, M., ‘Hill, Samuel’, ODNB.Google Scholar
Grell, O. P., ed., Paracelsus: the man and his reputation, his ideas and their transformation (Leiden, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gribbe, C., ‘John Owen, Renaissance man? The evidence of Edward Millington’s Bibliotheca Oweniana (1684)’, in The Ashgate research companion to John Owen’s theology, eds., Kapic, K. M. and Jones, M. (Aldershot, 2012), 97–112.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. I. J. jnr., Latitudinarianism in the seventeenth-century Church of England, ed. Freedman, L. (Leiden, 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grunert, F., and Vollhard, F., eds., Historia literaria. Neuordnungen des Wissens im 17. und 18. Jahrhundert (Berlin, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruys, J. A., The early printed editions (1518–1664) of Aeschylus: a chapter in the history of classical scholarship (The Hague, 1981).Google Scholar
Guelluy, R., ‘L’évolution des methods théologiques à Louvain d’Erasme à Jansénius’, Revue d’Histoire Ecclésiastique, 37 (1941), 31–144.Google Scholar
Gueroult, M., Dianoématique: histoire de l’histoire de la philosophie (3 vols, Paris, 1979–88).Google Scholar
Guicciardini, N., Reading the Principia: the debate on Newton’s mathematical methods for natural philosophy from 1687 to 1736 (Cambridge, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guicciardini, N., Isaac Newton on mathematical certainty and method (Cambridge [MA], 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guinsburg, A. M., ‘Henry More, Thomas Vaughan and the late Renaissance magical tradition’, Ambix, 27 (1980), 36–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurlt, E., Geschichte der Chirurgie und ihrer Ausübung: Volkschirurgie—Alterthum—Mittelalter—Renaissance (3 vols, Berlin, 1898).Google Scholar
Güthenke, C., ‘Shop Talk. Reception studies and recent work in the history of scholarship’, Classical Receptions, 1 (2009), 104–15.Google Scholar
Gwynn, R., ‘Conformity, non-conformity and Huguenot settlement in England in the later seventeenth century’, in The religious culture of the Huguenots, 1660–1750, ed. Dunan-Page, A. (Aldershot, 2006), 23–42.Google Scholar
Gwynn, R., ‘Strains of worship: the Huguenots and non-conformity’, in The Huguenots: history and memory in transnational context (Leiden, 2011), 121–52.Google Scholar
Hadot, P., ‘La survie du Commentaire de Simplicius sur le Manuel d’Epictète du XVe au XVIIe siècles: Perotti, Politien, Steuchus, John Smith, Cudworth’, in Simplicius, sa vie, son oeuvre, sa survie, ed. Hadot, I. (Berlin and New York, 1987), 326–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Häfner, R., ‘Das Erkenntnisproblem in der Philologie um 1700: Zum Verhältnis von Polymathie und Aporetik bei J. F. Reimmann, Chr. Thomasius und J. A. Fabricius’, in Philologie und Erkenntni: Beiträge zu Begriff und Problem frühneuzeitlicher ‘Philologie’, ed. Häfner, R. (Tübingen, 2001), 95–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Häfner, R., Die Götter im Exil: Frühneuzeitliches Dichtungsverständnis im Spannungsfeld christlicher Apologetik und philogischer Kritik (ca.1590–1736) (Tübingen, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Häfner, R., ‘Shaping early modern comparative studies: the significance of Christoph Arnold (1627–1685)’, in Patristic tradition and intellectual paradigms in the 17th century, eds., Bergjan, S.-P. and Pollmann, K. (Tübingen, 2010), 3–18.Google Scholar
Hall, M. B., ‘Hero’s Pneumatica: a study of its transmission and influence’, Isis, 40 (1949), 38–48.Google Scholar
Hall, M. B., ‘The establishment of the mechanical philosophy’, Osiris, 10 (1952), 412–41.Google Scholar
Hall, M. B., ‘Acid and alkali in seventeenth-century chemistry’, Archives Internationales d’Histoire des Sciences, 9 (1956), 13–28.Google Scholar
Halleux, R., ‘La controverse sur les origines de la chimie, de Paracelse à Borrichius’, in Acta Conventus neo-Latini Turonensis, ed. Margolin, J. C. (2 vols, Paris, 1980), ii, 807–19.Google Scholar
Hämeen-Anttila, J., The last pagans of Iraq: Ibn Waḥshiyya and his Nabatean Agriculture (Leiden, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, A., The apocryphal apocalypse: the reception of the second book of Esdras (4 Ezra) from the Renaissance to the Enlightenment (Oxford, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, A., The Copts and the West, 1439–1822: the European discovery of the Egyptian church (Oxford, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, A., ‘Huntington, Robert’, ODNB.Google Scholar
Hammond, P., ‘Thomas Smith: a beleaguered humanist of the Interregnum’, Bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research, 56 (1983), 180–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handley, S., ‘Scrivener, Matthew’, ODNB.Google Scholar
Handley, S., ‘Seller, Abednego’, ODNB.Google Scholar
Hanegraaff, W. J., ‘Beyond the Yates paradigm: the study of Western esotericism between counterculture and new complexity’, Aries, 1 (2001), 5–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanegraaff, W. J., Esotericism and the academy: rejected knowledge in Western culture (Cambridge, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hankins, J., ‘Socrates in the Italian Renaissance’, in Socrates, from antiquity to the Enlightenment, ed. Trapp, M. B. (Aldershot, 2007), 179–208.Google Scholar
Hankins, J., ‘Humanism, scholasticism, and Renaissance philosophy’, in The Cambridge companion to Renaissance philosophy, ed. Hankins, J. (Cambridge, 2007), 30–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hankins, J., and Palmer, A., The recovery of ancient philosophy in the Renaissance (Florence, 2008).Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J., Cause and explanation in ancient Greek thought (Oxford, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, C. W., ‘The ancient atomists and English literature of the seventeenth century’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology, 45 (1934), 1–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, P., ‘Religion’ and the religions in the English enlightenment (Cambridge, 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, P., The Bible, Protestantism, and the rise of natural science (Cambridge, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, P., ‘The influence of Cartesian cosmology in England’, in Descartes’ natural philosophy, eds. Gaukroger, S., Schuster, J., and Sutton, J. (London, 2000), 168–92.Google Scholar
Hartbecke, K., Metaphysik und Naturphilosophie im 17. Jahruhundert. Francis Glissons Substanztheorie in ihrem ideengeschichtlichen Kontext (Tübingen, 2006).Google Scholar
Hartnup, K., ‘On the beliefs of the Greeks’: Leo Allatios and popular orthodoxy (Leiden, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harwood, J., ‘Introduction’, in The early essays and ethics of Robert Boyle, ed. Harwood, J. (Carbondale and Edwardsville, 1991), xv–lxix.Google Scholar
Haskell, F., History and its images: art and the interpretation of the past (New Haven, 1993).Google Scholar
Hasper, P. J., ‘Aristotle’s diagnosis of atomism’, Apeiron, 39 (2006), 121–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatfield, G., ‘Metaphysics and the new science’, in Reappraisals of the scientific revolution, eds., Lindberg, D. C. and Westman, R. S. (Cambridge, 1990), 93–166.Google Scholar
Hatzimichali, M., Potamo of Alexandria and the emergence of eclecticism in late Hellenistic philosophy (Cambridge, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haugen, K. L., ‘Transformation in the trinity doctrine in English scholarship: from the history of beliefs to the history of texts’, Archiv für Religionsgeschichte 3 (2001), 149–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haugen, K. L., Richard Bentley: poetry and enlightenment (Cambridge [MA], 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haugen, K. L., ‘Hebrew poetry transformed, or, scholarship invincible between Renaissance and Enlightenment’, JWCI, 75 (2012), 1–29.Google Scholar
Hazard, P. La Crise de la conscience européenne (Paris, 1935) [=The European mind (1680–1715), trans. May, J. Lewis (London, 1953)].Google Scholar
Hedley, D., Coleridge, philosophy and religion: aids to reflection and the mirror of spirit (Cambridge, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heller, H. J., The seventeenth century Hebrew book: an abridged thesaurus (Leiden, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, F., ‘Unpublished material from the memodrandum book of Robert Hooke, Guildhall Library MS 1758’, NRRS, 61 (2007), 129–75.Google Scholar
Heninger, S. K., Touches of sweet harmony: Pythagorean cosmology and Renaissance poetics (Huntington, 1974).Google Scholar
Heninger, S. K., ‘Some Renaissance versions of the Pythagorean tetrad’, Studies in the Renaissance, 8 (1961), 7–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, J., ‘Atomism and eschatology: Catholicism and natural philosophy in the Interregnum’, BJHS, 15 (1982), 211–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, J., ‘Occult qualities and the experimental philosophy: active principles in pre-Newtonian matter theory’, History of Science, 24 (1986), 335–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, J., ‘Medicine and pneumatology: Henry More, Richard Baxter, and Francis Glisson’s Treatise on the energetic nature of substance’, Medical History, 31 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, J., ‘Henry More versus Robert Boyle: the spirit of nature and the nature of providence’, in Henry More: tercentenary studies, ed. Hutton, S. (Dordrecht, 1990), 55–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, J., ‘Sir Kenelm Digby, recusant philosopher’, in Insiders and outsiders in seventeenth-century philosophy, eds. Rogers, G. A. J., Sorell, T., and Kraye, J. (London, 2010), 43–75.Google Scholar
Herklotz, I., Die Academia Basiliana: griechische Philologie, Kirchengeschichte und Unionsbemühungen im Rom der Barberini (Rome, 2008).Google Scholar
Hessayon, A., ‘Gold tried in the fire’: the prophet TheaurauJohn Tany and the English revolution (Aldershot, 2007).Google Scholar
Heyd, M., ‘Be Sober and Reasonable’: the critique of enthusiasm in the seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries (Leiden, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, J., and Milton, J. R., ‘The Epitome (Abrégé) of Locke’s Essay’, in The philosophy of John Locke: new perspectives, ed. Anstey, P. R. (London, 2003), 3–25.Google Scholar
Hillar, M., From logos to trinity: the evolution of religious beliefs from Pythagoras to Tertullian (Cambridge, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirai, H., ‘Le concept de semence de Pierre Gassendi entre les théories de la matière et les sciences de la vie au XVIIe siècle’, Medicina nei Secoli, 15 (2003), 205–26.Google Scholar
Hirai, H., Le concept de semence dans les théories de la matière à la Renaissance: De Marsile Ficin à Pierre Gassendi (Turnhout, 2005).Google Scholar
Hirai, H., ‘Atomes vivants, origine de l’âme et génération spontanée chez Daniel Sennert,’ Bruniana & Campanelliana, 13 (2007), 477–95.Google Scholar
Hirai, H., ‘The invisible hand of God in seeds: Jacob Schegk’s theory of plastic faculty’, ESM, 12 (2007), 377–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirai, H., ‘Lecture néoplatonicienne d’Hippocrate chez Fernel, Cardan et Gemma’, in Pratique et pensée médicales à la Renaissance, ed. Vons, J. (Paris, 2009), 241–56.Google Scholar
Hirai, H., Medical humanism and natural philosophy: Renaissance debates on matter, life and the soul (Leiden, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirai, H., ‘Lipsius on the world-soul between Roman cosmic theology and Renaissance “prisca theologia”’, in Justus Lipsius and Natural Philosophy, eds. Hirai, H. and Papy, J. (Brussels, 2011), 63–79.Google Scholar
Hochstrasser, T. J., Natural law theories in the early enlightenment (Cambridge, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofer, A., ‘The old man as Christ in Justin’s “Dialogue with Trypho”’, Vigiliae Christianae, 57 (2003), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofmann, M., Theologie, Dogma und Dogmenentwicklung im theologischen Werk Denis Petau’s (Frankfurt am Main, 1976).Google Scholar
Holt, P. M., ‘The treatment of Arab history by Prideaux, Ockley and Sale’, in Historians of the middle east, eds. Lewis, B. and Holt, P. M. (London, 1962), 290–302.Google Scholar
Holt, P. M., A seventeenth-century defender of Islam: Henry Stubbe (1632–76) and his book (London, 1972).Google Scholar
Holzhey, H., ‘Der Philosoph im 17. Jahruhundert’, in Grundriss der Greschichte der Philosophie begründet von Friedrich Ueberweg. Die Philosophie des 17. Jahrhunderts. Band 1: Allgemeine Themen. Iberische Halbinsel/Italien, ed. Schobinger, J.-P. (Basel, 1998), 3–30.Google Scholar
Horbury, W., ‘Spencer, John’, ODNB.Google Scholar
Horbury, W., ‘John Spencer (1630–93) and Hebrew study’, Letter of the Corpus Association, 78 (1999), 12–23.Google Scholar
Housman, A. E., ‘Introduction’, in Manilius, , Astronomicon, ed. Housman, A. E. (5 vols, Cambridge, 1937).Google Scholar
Howell, K. H., ‘Natural knowledge and textual meaning in Augustine’s interpretation of Genesis: the three functions of natural philosophy’, in Nature and scripture in the Abrahamic religions, eds. van der Meer, J. M. and Mandelbrote, S. (2 vols, Leiden, 2008), i, 117–145.Google Scholar
Hughes, A., ‘Popular presbyterianism in the 1640s and 1650s: the cases of Thomas Edwards and Thomas Hall’, in England’s long Reformation, 1500–1800, ed. Tyacke, N. (London, 1998), 235–59.Google Scholar
Hughes, A., ‘Thomas Edwards’s Gangraena and heresiological traditions’, in Heresy, literature and politics in early modern English culture, eds. Loewenstein, D. and Marshall, J. (Cambridge, 2006), 137–59.Google Scholar
Hughes, A., Gangraena and the struggle for the English Revolution (Oxford, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, F., ‘John Marsham, a forgotten antiquary’, Archaelogia Cantiana, 83 (1968), 49–54.Google Scholar
Hunt, R. W., ‘Introduction’, in Coxe, H. O., Bodleian Library Quarto Catalogues II: Laudian Manuscripts … reprinted from the edition of 1858–1885 … (Oxford, 1973).Google Scholar
Hunter, I., Rival enlightenments: civil and metaphysical philosophy in early modern Germany (Cambridge, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, I., ‘The university philosopher in early modern Germany’, in The philosopher in early modern Europe, eds., Condren, C., Gaukroger, S., and Hunter, I. (Cambridge, 2006), 35–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, M., ‘Ancients, moderns, philologists, and scientists’, Annals of Science, 39 (1982), 187–92.Google Scholar
Hunter, M., Establishing the new science: the experience of the early Royal Society (Woodbridge, 1989).Google Scholar
Hunter, M., ‘Latitudinarianism and the “ideology” of the early Royal Society: Thomas Sprat’s History of the Royal Society (1667) reconsidered’, in Philosophy, science, and religion in England, 1640–1700, eds. Kroll, R., Ashcraft, R., and Zagorin, P. (Cambridge, 1992), 199–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, M., The Royal Society and its fellows, 1660–1700: the morphology of an early scientific institution (2nd edn, Stanford in the Vale, 1994).Google Scholar
Hunter, M., Science and the shape of orthodoxy: intellectual change in late seventeenth-century Britain (Woodbridge, 1995).Google Scholar
Hunter, M., The Boyle papers: understanding the manuscripts of Robert Boyle (Aldershot, 2007).Google Scholar
Hunter, M., ‘Robert Boyle and the early Royal Society: a reciprocal exchange in the making of Baconian science’, BJHS, 40 (2007), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, M., ‘Robert Boyle’s early intellectual evolution: A reappraisal’, Intellectual History Review, 25 (2015), 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, M., and Davis, E. B., ‘The making of Robert Boyle’s Free enquiry into the vulgarly receiv’d notion of nature’, in The Boyle papers: understanding the manuscripts of Robert Boyle (Aldershot, 2007), 219–76.Google Scholar
Hutton, S., ‘The neoplatonic roots of Arianism: Ralph Cudworth and Theophilus Gale’, in Socinianism and its role in the culture of the XVIth to XVIIIth Centuries, ed. Szczucki, L. (Warsaw, 1983), 139–45.Google Scholar
Hutton, S., ‘Reason and revelation in the Cambridge Platonists, and their reception of Spinoza’, in Spinoza in der Frühzeit seiner Religiösen Wirkung, eds. Gründer, K. and Schmidt-Biggemann, W. (Heidelberg, 1984), 181–200.Google Scholar
Hutton, S., ‘Henry More and Jacob Boehme’, in Henry More: tercentenary studies, ed. Hutton, S. (Dordrecht, 1990), 158–71.Google Scholar
Hutton, S., ‘Edward Stillingfleet, Henry More, and the decline of Moses Atticus: a note on seventeenth-century Anglican apologetics’, in Philosophy, science, and religion in England, 1640–1700, eds., Kroll, R., Ashcraft, R., and Zagorin, P. (Cambridge, 1992), 68–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutton, S., ‘Science, philosophy, and atheism: Edward Stillingfleet’s defence of religion’, in Scepticism and irreligion in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, eds., Popkin, R. H. and Vanderjagt, A. (Leiden, 1993), 102–21.Google Scholar
Hutton, S., ‘Henry More and Anne Conway on preexistence and universal salvation’, in ‘Mind senior to the world’: Stoicismo e origenismo nella filosofia platonica del Seicento inglese, ed. Baldi, M. (Milan, 1996), 113–26.Google Scholar
Hutton, S., ‘Platonism and the trinity: Anne Conway, Henry More and Christoph Sand’, in Socinianism and Arminianism: antitrinitarians, Calvinists and cultural exchange in seventeenth-century Europe, eds., Mulsow, M. and Rohls, J. (Leiden, 2005), 209–24.Google Scholar
Hutton, S., ‘Henry More, Anne Conway and the Kabbalah: a cure for the Kabbalistic nightmare’, in Judaeo-Christian intellectual culture in the seventeenth century, ed. Coudert, A. P. (Leiden, 1999), 27–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutton, S., ‘Aristotle and the Cambridge Platonists: the case of Cudworth’, in Philosophy in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries: conversations with Aristotle, eds., Blackwell, C. and Kusukawa, S. (Aldershot, 1999), 337–49.Google Scholar
Hutton, S., ‘The Cambridge Platonists’, in A companion to early modern philosophy, ed. Nadler, S. (London, 2002), 308–19.Google Scholar
Hutton, S., ‘Smith, John’, ODNB.Google Scholar
Hutton, S., ‘Iconisms, enthusiasm, and Origen: Henry More reads the Bible’, in Scripture and scholarship in early modern England, eds., Hessayon, A. and Keene, N. (Aldershot, 2006), 192–207.Google Scholar
Idel, M., ‘The magical and neoplatonic interpretations of the Kabbalah in the Renaissance’, in Jewish thought in the sixteenth century, ed. Cooperman, B. D. (Cambridge [MA], 1983), 186–242.Google Scholar
Idel, M., ‘Jewish Kabbalah and Platonism in the Middle Ages and Renaissance’, in Neoplatonism and Jewish thought, ed. Goodman, L. E. (Albany, 1992), 319–51.Google Scholar
Idel, M., ‘Prisca theologia in Marsilio Ficino and some Jewish treatments’, in Marsilio Ficino: his theology, his philosophy, his legacy, eds., Allen, M. J. B. and Rees, V. (Leiden, 2002), 137–58.Google Scholar
Idel, M., ‘Jewish thinkers versus Christian Kabbalah’, in Christliche Kabbala, ed. Schmidt-Biggemann, W. (Ostfildern, 2003), 49–65.Google Scholar
Idel, M., ‘Kabbalah, Platonism and prisca theologia: the case of R. Menasseh Ben Israel’, in Menasseh ben Israel and his world (Leiden, 1989), 207–19.Google Scholar
Iliffe, R., ‘Isaac Newton: Lucatello Professor of mathematics’, in Science incarnate: historical embodiments of natural knowledge, eds., Lawrence, C. and Shapin, S. (Chicago, 1998), 121–55.Google Scholar
Isler, H., Thomas Willis, 1621–1675: doctor and scientist (New York, 1968 [German original=1965]).Google Scholar
Israel, J. I., ‘Philosophy, history of philosophy, and l’histoire de l’esprit humain: a historiographical question and problem for philosophers’, in Teaching new histories of philosophy, ed. Schneewind, J. B. (Princeton, 2004), 329–344.Google Scholar
Israel, J. I., Enlightenment contested: philosophy, modernity, and the emancipation of man, 1670–1752 (Oxford, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ito, Y., ‘Hooke’s cyclic theory of the earth in the context of seventeenth century England’, BJHS, 21 (1988), 295–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iversen, E., The myth of Egypt and its hieroglyphs in European tradition (Princeton [NJ], 1993 [1st edn=Copenhagen, 1961]).Google Scholar
Iversen, E., ‘Egypt in classical antiquity. A résumé’, in Hommages à Jean Leclant, eds., Berger, C., Clerc, G., and Grimal, N. (Cairo, 1994), 295–305.Google Scholar
Jacob, A., ‘Henry More’s Psychodia Platonica and its Relationship to Marsilio Ficino’s Theologia Platonica’, JHI, 44 (1985), 503–22.Google Scholar
Jacob, A., De naturae natura: a study of idealistic conceptions of nature and the unconscious (Stuttgart, 1991).Google Scholar
Jacob, A., ‘Introduction’, in More, Henry, Manual of metaphysics, ed. and trans. Jacob, A., (Hildesheim, 1995), i–lxxvi.Google Scholar
Jacob, A., ‘The spirit of nature as “Hylarchic” principle of the universe’, in More, Henry, Manual of metaphysics, ed. and trans. Jacob, A., (Hildesheim, 1995), ii, i–xlix.Google Scholar
Jacob, J. R., ‘Boyle’s atomism and the Restoration assault on pagan naturalism’, Social Studies of Science, 8 (1978), 211–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacob, J. R., Hebry Stubbe, radical Protestantism and the early enlightenment (Cambridge, 1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacob, M. C. and Lockwood, W. A., ‘Political millenarianism and Burnet’s Sacred theory’, Science Studies, 2 (1972), 265–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacquart, D., ‘Minima in twelfth-century medical texts from Salerno’, in Late medieval and early modern corpuscular matter theories, eds., Lüthy, C., Murdoch, J. E., and Newman, W. (Leiden, 2001), 39–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacquot, J., and Jones, H. W., ‘Introduction’, in Hobbes, , Critique du De mundo de Thomas White, eds., Jacquot, J. and Jones, H. W. (Paris, 1973), 9–102.Google Scholar
Jahn, M., ‘A bibliographical history of John Woodward’s An essay toward a natural history of the earth’, Journal of the Society of the Bibliography of Natural History, 6 (1974), 181–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jardine, N., ‘Galileo’s road to truth and the demonstrative regress’, SHPS, 7 (1976), 277–31.Google Scholar
Jardine, N., ‘Keeping order in the school of Padua’, in Method and order in Renaissance philosophy of nature: the Aristotle commentary tradition, eds., Di Liscia, D. A., Kessler, E., and Methuen, C. (Aldershot, 1997), 183–209.Google Scholar
Jaumann, H., ed., Die europäische Gelehrtenrepublik im Zeitalter des Konfessionalismus (Wiesbaden, 2001).Google Scholar
Jehasse, J., Renaissance de la critique: l’essor de l’humanisme érudit de 1560 à 1614 (Saint Etienne, 1976).Google Scholar
Johns, A., ‘Prudence and pedantry in early modern cosmology: the trade of Al Ross’, History of Science, 35 (1997), 23–59.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. R., ‘Was Gassendi an Epicurean?’, History of Philosophy Quarterly, 20 (2003), 339–60.Google Scholar
Johnston, S. I., Hekate soteira: a study of Hekate’s role in the Chaldean oracles and related literature (Atlanta, 1990).Google Scholar
Joly, B., ‘Les references à la philosophie antique dans les débats sur l’alchimie au début du XVIIe siècle’, in Alchimie: Art, histoire et myths, eds., Kahn, D. and Matton, S. (Paris/Milan, 1995), 671–90.Google Scholar
Jones, M., Why heaven kissed earth: the Christology of the puritan Reformed orthodox theologian, Thomas Goodwin (1600–1680) (Göttingen, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, R. F., Ancients and moderns: a study of the rise of the scientific movement in seventeenth-century England (2nd edn, Berkeley, 1961).Google Scholar
Jones, W. R., ‘Brown, Thomas’, ODNB.Google Scholar
de Jong, A., Traditions of the Magi: Zoroastrianism in Greek and Latin literature (Leiden, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Jonge, H. J, ‘The study of the New Testament’, in Leiden University in the seventeenth century, eds., Scheurleer, T. H. Lunsingh and Meyjes, G. H. M. Posthumus (Leiden, 1975), 64–109.Google Scholar
de Jonge, H. J, ‘The study of the New Testament in the Dutch universities, 1575–1700’, in History of Universities, 1 (1981), 113–29.Google Scholar
de Jonge, H. J, ‘Hugo Grotius: exegete du Nouveau Testament’, in The world of Hugo Grotius (1583–1645) (Amsterdam, 1984), 176–93.Google Scholar
de Jonge, H. J, ‘Grotius’ View of the Gospels and the Evangelists’, in Hugo Grotius, theologian, eds., Nellen, H. J. M. and Rabbie, E. (Leiden, 1994), 65–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joost-Gaugier, C. L., Pythagoras and Renaissance Europe: finding heaven (Cambridge, 2009).Google Scholar
Jorink, E., Reading the book of nature in the Dutch golden age, 1575–1715 (Leiden, 2010 [Dutch original=2006]).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joy, L. S., Gassendi the atomist: advocate of history in an age of science (Cambridge, 1987).Google Scholar
Joy, L. S., ‘Epicureanism in Renaisance moral and natural philosophy’, JHI, 53 (1992), 573–83.Google Scholar
Jue, J. K., Heaven upon earth: Joseph Mede (1586–1638) and the legacy of millenarianism (Dordrecht, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jungkuntz, R., ‘Fathers, heretics and Epicureans’, The Journal of Ecclesiastical History, 17 (1966), 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaehler, S. A., ‘Der Kampf zwischen Theologie und Philosophie, 1680–1702’, in Die Philipps-Universität zu Marburg, 1527–1927, eds. Hermlink, H. and Kaehler, S. A. (Marburg, 1927), 299–331.Google Scholar
Kákosy, L., ‘Plato and Egypt. The Egyptian tradition’, in Gedenkschrift István Hahn, ed. Németh, G. (Budapest, 1993), 25–8.Google Scholar
Kákosy, L., ‘Egypt in ancient Greek and Roman thought’, in Civilizations of the ancient near east, eds., Sasson, J. M., Baines, J., Beckman, G., and Rubinson, K. S. (New York, 1995), 3–14.Google Scholar
Kangro, H., ‘Erklärungswert und Schwierigkeiten der Atomhypothese und ihrer Anwendung auf chemische Probleme in der ersten Hälfte des 17. Jahrhunderts’, Technikgeschichte, 35 (1968), 14–36.Google Scholar
Kaplan, B., ‘Divulging of Useful Truths in Physick’: the medical agenda of Robert Boyle (Baltimore, 1993).Google Scholar
Kaplan, Y., Méchoulan, H., and Popkin, R. H., eds., Menasseh ben Israel and his world (Leiden, 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kargon, R. H., ‘Walter Charleton, Robert Boyle and the acceptance of Epicurean atomism in England’, Isis, 55 (1964), 184–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kargon, R. H., ‘Newton, Barrow and the hypothetical physics’, Centaurus, 11 (1966), 46–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karrer, L., Die Historisch-Positive Methode des Theologen Dionysius Petavius (Munich, 1970).Google Scholar
Kassler, J. C., The honourable Roger North (1651–1734): on life, morality, law and tradition (Ashgate, 2009).Google Scholar
Katchen, A. L., Christian Hebraists and Dutch rabbis: seventeenth century apologetics and the study of Maimonides’ Mishneh Torah (Cambridge [MA], 1984).Google Scholar
Katz, D. S., ‘The Abendana brothers and the Christian Hebraists of seventeenth-century England’, Journal of Ecclesiastical History, 40 (1989), 28–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keblusek, M., ‘The exile experience. Royalist and Anglican book culture in the Low Countries (1640–1660)’, in The bookshop of the world. The role of the Low Countries in the book-trade, 1473–1941, eds., Hellinga, L., Duke, A., and Harskamp, J. (Houten, 2001), 151–8.Google Scholar
Keblusek, M., ‘A tortoise in the shell: Royalist and Anglican experience of exile in the 1650s’, in Literatures of exile in the English Revolution and its aftermath, 1640–1690, ed. Major, P. (Aldershot, 2010), 79–91.Google Scholar
Keene, N., ‘John Fell: education, erudition and the English Church in late seventeenth-century Oxford’, History of Universities, 18 (2003), 62–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, D., The descent of ideas: the history of intellectual history (Aldershot, 2002).Google Scholar
Kenney, E. J., The classical text: aspects of editing in the age of the printed book (Berkeley, 1974).Google Scholar
Keseru, G., ‘Religiones rationales in Transylvania’, in György Enyedi and central European Unitarianism, eds., Balázs, M. and Keserű, G. (Budapest, 2000), 125–36.Google Scholar
Kessler, E., ‘The intellective soul’, in The Cambridge history of Renaissance philosophy, eds., Schmitt, C. B. and Skinner, Q. (Cambridge, 1988), 484–534.Google Scholar
Kessler, E., ‘The transformation of Aristotelianism during the Renaissance’, in New perspectives on Renaissance thought, eds., Henry, J. and Hutton, S. (London, 1990), 137–47.Google Scholar
Kessler, E., and Lohr, C. H., and Sparn, W., eds., Aristotelismus und Renaissance (Wiesbaden, 1988).Google Scholar
Kibre, P., Hippocrates Latinus: repertorium of Hippocratic writings in the Latin Middle Ages (New York, 1985).Google Scholar
Kidd, C., Before nationalism: ethnicity and nationhood in the Atlantic world, 1600–1800 (Cambridge, 1999).Google Scholar
Killeen, K., Biblical scholarship, science and politics in early modern England: Thomas Browne and the thorny place of knowledge (Farnham, 2009).Google Scholar
King, H., ‘Hodges, Nathaniel’, ODNB.Google Scholar
Kirsop, W., ‘Prolégomènes à une étude de la publication et de la diffusion des Opera omnia de Gassendi’, in Materia actuosa: antiquité, âge classique, lumières (Paris, 2000), 207–15.Google Scholar
Klein, D., ‘Muslimischer Antitrinitarismus im lutherischen Rostock. Zacharias Grapius der Jüngere und die Epistola theologica des Ahmed ibn Abdallāh’, in Wahrnehmung des Islam zwischen Reformation und Aufklärung, eds., Klein, D. and Platow, B. (Munich, 2008), 41–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klempt, A., Die Säkularisierung der universalhistorischen Auffassung im 16. Und 17. Jahrhundert (Berlin, 1960).Google Scholar
Klutstein, I., ‘Marsile Ficin et les “Oracles Chaldaïques”’, in Marsilio Ficino e il ritorno di Platone, ed. Garfagnini, G. C. (Florence, 1976), 331–8.Google Scholar
Klutstein, I., Marsilio Ficino et la théologie ancienne: Oralces Chaldaïques, Hymnes Orphiques, Hymnes de Proclus (Florence, 1987).Google Scholar
Knijff, P., Visser, S. J., and Visser, P., Bibliographia Sociniana: a bibliographical reference tool for the study of Dutch Socinianism and antitrinitarianism (Amsterdam, 2004).Google Scholar
Knoepfler, D., La Vie de Ménédème d’Érétrie de Diogène Laërce: contribution à l’histoire et à la critique du texte des Vies des Philosophes (Basel, 1991).Google Scholar
Knoespel, K. J., ‘Interpretative strategies in Newton’s Theologiae gentilis origines philosophicae’, in Newton and religion: context, nature and influence, eds., Force, J. and Popkin, R. H. (Dordrecht, 1999), 179–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kollerstrom, N., ‘The hollow world of Edmond Halley’, Journal for the History of Astronomy, 23 (1992), 185–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsten, F., Roger North (1651–1734) virtuoso and essayist (Amsterdam and Maarssen, 1981).Google Scholar
Korsten, F., ‘Thomas Baker’s Reflections upon learning’, in Studies in seventeenth century English literature, history and bibliography, eds., Janssens, G. A. M. and Aarts, F. G. A. M. (Amsterdam, 1984), 133–48.Google Scholar
Kraye, J., ‘The pseudo-Aristotelian Theology in sixteenth- and seventeenth-century Europe’, in Pseudo- Aristotle in the middle ages, eds., Kraye, J., Ryan, W. F., and Schmitt, C. B. (London, 1986), 265–86.Google Scholar
Kraye, J., ‘Daniel Heinsius and the author of De mundo’, in The uses of Greek and Latin: historical essays, eds., Dionissoti, A.C., Grafton, A., and Kraye, J. (London, 1988), 171–97.Google Scholar
Kraye, J., ‘Aristotle’s God and the authenticity of “De mundo”: an early modern controversy’, JHP, 28 (1990), 339–58.Google Scholar
Kraye, J., ‘“Ethnicorum omnium sanctissimus”: Marcus Aurelius and his Meditations from Xylander to Diderot’, in Humanism and early modern philosophy, eds., Kraye, J. and Stone, M. (London, 2000), 107–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraye, J., ‘Ficino in the firing line: a renaissance neoplatonist and his critics’, in Marsilio Ficino: his theology, his philosophy, his legacy, eds., Allen, M. J. B. and Rees, V. (Leiden, 2002), 377–97.Google Scholar
Kraye, J., ‘The legacy of ancient philosophy’, in The Cambridge companion to Greek and Roman philosophy, ed. Sedley, D. (Cambridge, 2003), 323–52.Google Scholar
Kraye, J., ‘Philology, moral philosophy and religion in Thomas Gataker’s edition of Marcus Aurelius’s Meditations (1652)’, in Ethik—Wissenschaft oder Lebenskunst? Modelle der Normenbegründung von der Antike bis zur Frühen Neuzeit, eds., Ebbersmeyer, S. and Kessler, E. (Münster, 2007), 293–307.Google Scholar
Kraye, J., ‘Pagan philosophy and patristics in Erasmus and his contemporaries’, Erasmus of Rotterdam Society Yearbook, 31 (2011), 33–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraye, J., Ryan, W. F., and Schmitt, C. B., eds., Pseudo-Aristotle in the Middle Ages (London, 1986).Google Scholar
Kristeller, P. O., Aristotelismo e sincretismo nel pensiero di Pietro Pomponazzi (Padua, 1983).Google Scholar
Kroll, R., The material word: literate culture in the Restoration and early eighteenth century (Baltimore, 1991).Google Scholar
Kusukawa, S., ‘Bacon’s classification of knowledge’, in The Cambridge companion to Bacon, ed. M. Peltonen (Cambridge, 1996), 47–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labib-Rahman, L., ‘Sir Jean Chardin, the great traveller (1642–1712/13)’, Proceedings of the Huguenot Society, 23 (1977–82), 309–18.Google Scholar
Lagrée, J., ‘Lumière naturelle et notions communes: Herbert de Cherbury et Culverwell’, in ‘Mind senior to the world’: stoicismo e origenismo nella filosofia platonica del Seicento inglese, ed. Baldi, M. (Milan, 1996), 35–54.Google Scholar
Lake, P., ‘The Laudians and the argument from authority’, in Court, country and culture: essays on early modern British history in honor of Perez Zagorin, eds., Kunze, B. Y. and Brautigam, D. D. (New York, 1992), 149–75.Google Scholar
Laplanche, F., L’écriture, le sacré et l’histoire: érudits et politiques Protestants devant la Bible en France au XVIIe siècle (Amsterdam, 1986).Google Scholar
Laplanche, F., ‘Grotius et les religions du paganisme dans les Annotationes in Vetus Testamentum’, in Hugo Grotius, Theologian, eds., Nellen, H. J. M. and Rabbie, E. (Leiden, 1994), 53–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larminie, V., ‘Allix, Peter [Pierre]’, ODNB.Google Scholar
Lasswitz, K., Geschichte der Atomistik vom Mittelalter bis Newton (2 vols, Hamburg and Leipzig, 1890).Google Scholar
Laursen, J. C., ‘Temporizing after Bayle: Isaac de Beausobre and the Manicheans’, in The Berlin refuge 1680–1780: learning and science in European context, eds., Pot, S., Mulsow, M., and Danneberg, L. (Leiden, 2003), 89–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laven, H., The ‘Acta Eruditorum’ under the editorship of Otto Mencke: the history of an international learned journal between 1682 and 1707, trans. Richards, L., (Amsterdam, 1990 [Dutch orig.=1986]).Google Scholar
Le Gall, J.-M., Le mythe de Saint Denis: entre Renaissance et Révolution (Seyssel, 2007).Google Scholar
Lehmann-Brauns, S., Wisheit in der Weltgeschichte: Philosophiegeschichte zwischen Barock und Aufklärung (Tübingen, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehnus, L., ‘Callimaco redivivo tra Th. Stanley e R. Bentley’, Eikasmos, 2 (1991), 285–309.Google Scholar
Leighton, C. D. A., ‘The religion of the non-jurors and the early British enlightenment: a study of Henry Dodwell’, in History of European Ideas, 28 (2002), 247–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leighton, C. D. A., ‘Ancienneté among the non-jurors: a study of Henry Dodwell’, History of European Ideas, 31 (2005), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leijenhorst, C., ‘Franceso Patrizi’s Hermetic philosophy’, in Gnosis and Hermeticism from antiquity to modern times, eds., van den Broek, R. and Hanegraaff, W. J. (Albany, 1998), 125–46.Google Scholar
Leijenhorst, C., The mechanization of Aristotelianism: the late Aristotelian setting of Thomas Hobbes’ natural philosophy (Leiden, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leng, T., Benjamin Worlsey (1618–1677): trade, interest and the spirit in revolutionary England (New York, 2008).Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G., ‘The comparative study of animal development: William Harvey’s Aristotelianism’, in The problem of animal generation in early modern philosophy, ed. Smith, J. E. H. (Cambridge, 2006), 21–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leslie, M., ‘The spiritual husbandry of John Beale’, in Culture and cultivation in early modern England, eds., Leslie, M. and Raylor, T. (Leicester, 1992), 151–72.Google Scholar
Lettinga, N., ‘Covenant theology turned upside down: Henry Hammond and Caroline Anglican moralism’, Sixteenth-Century Journal, 24 (1993), 653–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, J., Dr Woodward’s shield: history, science, and satire in Augustan England (Berkeley, 1977).Google Scholar
Levine, J., The Battle of the Books: history and literature in the Augustan Age (Ithaca [NY], 1991).Google Scholar
Levine, J., Between the ancients and the moderns: Baroque culture in Restoration England (London, 1999).Google Scholar
Levine, J., ‘Latitudinarians, neoplatonists, and the ancient wisdom’, in Philosophy, science, and religion in England, 1640–1700, eds., Kroll, R., Ashcraft, R., and Zagorin, P. (Cambridge, 1992), 85–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, J., ‘Deists and Anglicans: the ancient wisdom and the idea of progress’, in The margins of orthodoxy: heterodox writing and cultural response, 1660–1750, ed. Lund, R. D. (Cambridge, 1995), 219–40.Google Scholar
Levine, J., Between the ancients and the moderns: Baroque culture in Restoration England (New Haven, 1999).Google Scholar
Levitin, D., ‘Reconsidering John Sergeant’s attacks on Locke’s Essay’, Intellectual History Review, 20 (2010), 457–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitin, D., ‘Matthew Tindal’s Rights of the Christian Church (1706) and the church-state relationship’, HJ, 45 (2011), 717–40.Google Scholar
Levitin, D., ‘From sacred history to the history of religion: paganism, Judaism, and Christianity in European historiography from Reformation to “enlightenment”’, HJ, 55 (2012), 1117–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitin, D., ‘John Spencer’s De legibus Hebraeorum and “enlightened” sacred history: a new interpretation’, JWCI, 76 (2013), 49–92.Google Scholar
Levitin, D., ‘Edmund Halley and the eternity of the world revisited’, NRRS, 67 (2013), 315–29.Google Scholar
Levitin, D., ‘Rethinking English physico-theology: Samuel Parker’s Tentamina de Deo (1665)’, ESM, 19 (2014), 28–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitin, D., ‘“Made up from many experimentall notions”. The Society of Apothecaries, medical humanism, and the rhetoric of experience in 1630s London’, Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitin, D., ‘Egyptology, the limits of antiquarianism, and the origins of conjectural history, c. 1680–1740: new sources and perspectives’, History of European Ideas (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitin, D., ‘The historical assumptions behind the General Scholium: a non-metaphysical Newton’, in Newton’s General Scholium after 300 years, eds., Ducheyne, S., Mandelbrote, S. and Snobelen, S. (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Levitin, D., ‘Newton and scholastic philosophy’,British Journal for the History of Science (forthcoming, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, R., ‘“The Best Mnemonicall Expedient”. John Beale’s art of memory and its uses’, The Seventeenth Century, 20 (2005), 113–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, R., ‘Of “Origenian Platonisme”: Joseph Glanvill on the pre-existence of souls’, Huntington Library Quarterly, 69 (2006), 267–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, R., Language, mind and nature: artificial languages in England from Bacon to Locke (Cambridge, 2007).Google Scholar
Lewis, R., William Petty on the order of nature: an unpublished manuscript treatise (Temple [AR], 2012).Google Scholar
Ligota, C., ‘Der apologetische Rahmen der Mythendeutung im Frankreich des 17. Jahrhunderts (P. D. Huet)’, Mythographie der frühen Neuzeit: ihre Anwendung in den Künsten, ed. Killy, W. (Wiesbaden, 1984), 148–61.Google Scholar
Ligota, C., and Quantin, J.-L., ‘Introduction’, in History of scholarship, eds. Ligota, C. and Quantin, J.-L. (Oxford, 2006), 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lim, P., Mystery unveiled: the crisis of the trinity in early modern England (Oxford, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd Jones, G., The discovery of Hebrew in Tudor England: a third language (Manchester, 1983).Google Scholar
Lohr, C. H., ‘Metaphysics’, in The Cambridge history of Renaissance philosophy, eds., Schmitt, C. B. and Skinner, Q. (Cambridge, 1988), 537–638.Google Scholar
Lohr, C. H., ‘The sixteenth-century transformation of the Aristotelian natural philosophy’, in Aristotelismus und Renaissance, eds., Kesller, E., Lohr, C. H., and Sparn, W. (Wiesbaden, 1988), 89–100.Google Scholar
Lohr, C. H., ‘Renaissance Latin translations of the Greek commentaries on Aristotle’, in Humanism and early modern philosophy, eds., Kraye, J. and Stone, M. W. F. (London, 2000), 24–40.Google Scholar
Lolordo, A., Pierre Gassendi and the birth of early modern philosophy (Cambridge, 2007).Google Scholar
Long, P., ‘Humanism and science’, in Renaissance humanism: foundations, forms and legacy, ed. Rabil, A. (3 vols, Philadelphia, 1988), iii, 468–512.Google Scholar
Longo, M., ‘A “critical” history of philosophy and the early enlightenment: Johann Jacob Brucker’, in Santinello ii, 477–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longrigg, J., Greek Rational medicine: philosophy and medicine from Alcmaeon to the Alexandrians (London, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lonie, I. M., ‘The “Paris Hippocratics”: teaching and research in Paris in the second half of the sixteenth century’, in The medical Renaissance of the sixteenth century, eds., Wear, A., French, R. K., and Lonie, I. M. (Cambridge, 1985), 155–72.Google Scholar
Loop, J., ‘Johann Heinrich Hottinger (1620–1667) and the “Historia Orientalis”’, Church History and Religious Culture, 88 (2008), 169–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loveman, K., ‘Samuel Pepys and “Discourses touching religion” under James II’, English Historical Review, 127 (2012), 46–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Lubac, H., Exégèse médiévale, les quatre sens de l’écriture (2 vols, Paris, 1959–61).Google Scholar
Lüthy, C., ‘Atomism, Lynceus, and the fate of 17th-century microscopy’, ESM, 1 (1996), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lüthy, C., ‘Thoughts and circumstances of Sébastien Basson. Analysis, micro-history, questions’, ESM, 2 (1997), 1–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lüthy, C., ‘What to do with seventeenth-century natural philosophy? A taxonomic problem’, Perspectives on Science, 8 (2000), 164–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lüthy, C., ‘The fourfold Democritus on the stage of early modern science’, Isis, 91 (2000), 443–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lüthy, C., ‘An Aristotelian watchdog as avant-garde physicist: Julius Caesar Scaliger’, The Monist, 84 (2001), 542–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lüthy, C., ‘Atoms and corpuscles. Kurd Lasswitz and the historiography of atomism’, Intellectual News, 11/12 (2003), 7–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lüthy, C., David Gorlaeus (1591–1612): an enigmatic figure in the history of philosophy and science (Amsterdam, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lüthy, C., and Newman, W. R., ‘“Matter” and “form”: by way of a preface’, ESM, 2 (1997), 215–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lüthy, C. and Newman, W. R., and Murdoch, J. E., and Newman, W. R., eds., Late medieval and early modern corpuscular matter theories (Leiden, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lüthy, C. and Newman, W. R., and Murdoch, J. E., and Newman, W. R., ‘Introduction: corpuscles, atoms, particles and minima’, in Late medieval and early modern corpuscular matter theories, eds., Lüthy, C., Murdoch, J. E., and Newman, W. (Leiden, 2001), 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luxon, T. H., Literal figures: Puritan allegory and the Reformation crisis in representation (Chicago, 1995).Google Scholar
Lyon, G. B., ‘Baudouin, Flacius, and the plan for the Magdeburg Centuries’, JHI, 64 (2003), 253–72.Google Scholar
Maber, R. G., Publishing in the republic of letters: the Ménage-Graevius-Wetestein correspondence, 1679–1692 (Amsterdam, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maclean, I., Interpretation and meaning in the Renaissance: the case of law (Cambridge, 1992).Google Scholar
Maclean, I., ‘Foucault’s Renaissance episteme: an Aristotelian counterblast’, JHI, 59 (1998), 149–66.Google Scholar
Maclean, I., Logic, signs and nature in the Renaissance: the case of learned medicine (Cambridge, 2002).Google Scholar
Mahoney, E. P., ‘Neoplatonism, the Greek commentators, and Renaissance Aristotelianism’, in Neoplatonism and Christian thought, ed. O’Meara, D. J. (Albany, 1982), 169–77, 264–82.Google Scholar
Mahoney, M. S., ‘Barrow’s mathematics: between ancients and moderns’, in Before Newton: the life and times of Isaac Barrow, ed. Feingold, M. (Cambridge, 1990), 179–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majercik, R., ‘Introduction’, in The Chaldean Oracles: text, translation, and commentary by Ruth Majercik (Leiden, 1989), 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malcolm, N., ‘Private and public knowledge: Kircher, esotericism, and the republic of letters’, in Athanasius Kircher: the last man who knew everything, ed. Findlen, P. (New York and London, 2004), 297–309.Google Scholar
Malcolm, N., ‘The library of Henry Oldenburg’, Electronic British Library Journal (2005), article 7.Google Scholar
Malcolm, N., ‘Jean Bodin and the authorship of the Colloquium Heptaplomeres’, JWCI, 69 (2006), 95–150.Google Scholar
Malcolm, N., ‘The name and nature of Leviathan: political symbolism and biblical exegesis’, IHR, 17 (2007), 21–39.Google Scholar
Malcolm, N., ‘The 1649 English Translation of the Koran: its Origins and Significance’, JWCI, 75, (2012), 261–95.Google Scholar
Malcolm, N., ‘General introduction’, in Hobbes, Thomas, Leviathan, ed. Malcolm, N. (3 vols, Oxford, 2012), i, 1–195.Google Scholar
Malet, A., ‘Isaac Barrow on the mathematization of nature: theological voluntarism and the rise of geometrical optics’, JHI, 58 (1997), 265–87.Google Scholar
Malusa, L., ‘Renaissance antecedents to the historiography of philosophy’, in Santinello i, 3–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malusa, L., ‘The first general histories of philosophy in England and the Low Countries’, in Santinello i, 163–71.Google Scholar
Mancosu, P., Philosophy of mathematics and mathematical practice in the seventeenth century (Oxford, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandelbrote, S., ‘“A duty of the greatest moment”: Isaac Newton and the writing of biblical criticism’, BJHS, 26 (1993), 281–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandelbrote, S., ‘Isaac Newton and Thomas Burnet: biblical criticism and the crisis of late seventeenth-century England’, in The books of nature and scripture, eds. Force, J. E. and Popkin, R. H. (Dordrecht, 1994), 149–78.Google Scholar
Mandelbrote, S., ‘The authority of the Word: manuscript, print and the text of the Bible in seventeenth-century England’, in The uses of script and print, 1300–1700, eds. Crick, J. and Walsham, A. (Cambridge, 2004), 135–56.Google Scholar
Mandelbrote, S., ‘William Petty and Anne Green: medical and political reform in Commonwealth Oxford’, in The practice of reform in health, medicine and science, 1500–2000 (Aldershot, 2005), 125–49.Google Scholar
Mandelbrote, S., ‘Beaumont, John’, ODNB.Google Scholar
Mandelbrote, S., ‘Burnet, Thomas’, ODNB.Google Scholar
Mandelbrote, S., ‘Clerke, Gilbert’, ODNB.Google Scholar
Mandelbrote, S., ‘Ray, John’, ODNB.Google Scholar
Mandelbrote, S., ‘“Then this nothing can be plainer”: Isaac Newton reads the fathers’, in Die Patristik in der frühen Neuzeit, eds., Frank, G., Leinkauf, T., and Wried, M. (Stuttgart, 2006), 277–97.Google Scholar
Mandelbrote, S., ‘Biblical hermeneutics and the sciences, 1700–1900: an overview’, in Nature and scripture in the Abrahamic religions, eds., van der Meer, J. and Mandelbrote, S. (2 vols, Leiden, 2008), ii, 3–40.Google Scholar
Mandelbrote, S., ‘Origen against Jerome in early modern Europe’, in Patristic tradition and intellectual paradigms in the 17th century, eds., Bergjan, S.-P. and Pollmann, K. (Tübingen, 2010), 106–35.Google Scholar
Mandelbrote, S., ‘Isaac Vossius and the Septuagint’, in Isaac Vossius (1618–1689): between science and scholarship, eds., Jorink, E. and van Miert, D. (Leiden, 2012), 85–118.Google Scholar
Manning, G., ‘Three biased reminders about hylomorphism in early modern science and philosophy’, in Matter and form in early modern science and philosophy, ed. Manning, G. (Leiden, 2012), 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manzo, S. A., ‘Francis Bacon and atomism: a reappraisal’, in Late medieval and early modern corpuscular matter theories, eds., Lüthy, C., Murdoch, J. E., and Newman, W. (Leiden, 2001), 209–44.Google Scholar
Marshall, J., ‘The ecclesiology of the latitude-men, 1660–1689: Stillingfleet, Tillotson and “Hobbism”’, Journal of Ecclesiastical History, 26 (1985), 407–27.Google Scholar
Marshall, J., John Locke: resistance, religion and responsibility (Cambridge, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, J., ‘Huguenot thought after the revocation of the Edict of Nantes: toleration, “Socinianism”, integration and Locke’, in From strangers to citizens: the integration of immigrant communities in Britain, Ireland and Colonian America, 1550–1750 (Portland [OR], 2001), 383–96.Google Scholar
Marshall, J., John Locke, toleration, and early enlightenment culture (Cambridge, 2006).Google Scholar
Marshall, P. J., ‘Thomas Hyde: stupor mundi’, The Hakluyt Society (London, 1982), 1–11.Google Scholar
Marshall, P. J., ‘Hyde, Thomas’, ODNB.Google Scholar
Marshall, W., ‘Tenison, Thomas’, ODNB.Google Scholar
Martin, C., Subverting Aristotle: religion, history and philosophy in early modern science (Baltimore, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, S., Flavius Josephus on the Pharisees: a composition-critical study (Leiden, 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayor, J. E. B., and Scott, R. F., Admissions to the college of St John the Evangelist (Cambridge, 1882–93).Google Scholar
McAdoo, H. R., The spirit of Anglicanism: a survey of Anglican theological method in the seventeenth century (London, 1965).Google Scholar
McColley, G., ‘The Ross-Wilkins controversy’, Annals of Science, 3 (1938), 153–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, N., Poetry and allegiance in the English civil wars: Marvell and the cause of wit (Oxford, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGiffert, M., ‘Henry Hammond and covenant theology’, Church History, 74 (2005), 255–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGowan, A., ‘Tertullian and the “heretical” origins of the “orthodox” trinity’, Journal of Early Christian Studies, 14 (2006), 437–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuire, J. E., ‘Newton’s “Principles of philosophy”: an intended Preface for the 1704 Optics and a related draft fragment’, BJHS, 5 (1970), 178–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuire, J. E., and Rattansi, P. M., ‘Newton and the “Pipes of Pan”’, NRRS, 21 (1966), 108–43.Google Scholar
McKenzie, D. F., The Cambridge University Press, 1696–1712: a bibliographical study (2 vols, Cambridge, 1966).Google Scholar
Meinel, C., ‘Early seventeenth-century atomism. Theory, epistemology, and the insufficiency of experiment’, Isis, 79 (1988), 68–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Melsen, A. G. M., From atomos to atom. The history of the concept of atom, trans. Koren, H. J. (New York, 1960 [1st Engl. edn=Pittsburgh, 1952; 1st Dutch edn=Amsterdam, 1949]).Google Scholar
Melton, F. T., Sir Robert Clayton and the origins of English deposit banking, 1658–1685 (Cambridge, 1986).Google Scholar
de Menasce, J. P., ‘Zoroastrian Pahlavi Writings’, in The Cambridge history of Iran. vol. iii: the Seleucid, Parthian and Sasanian periods, ed. E. Yarshater (2 vols, Cambridge, 1983, 2000), ii, 1166–1195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercier, R., ‘English orientalists and mathematical astronomy’, in The ‘Arabick’ interest of the natural philosophers in the seventeenth-century England, ed. Russell, G. A. (Leiden, 1994), 158–214.Google Scholar
Merkel, I., and Debus, A. G., eds., Hermeticism and the Renaissance: intellectual history and the occult in early modern Europe (Washington, 1988).Google Scholar
Meynell, G. G., ‘Sydenham, Locke and Sydenham’s De peste sive febre pestilentiali’, Medical History, 36 (1993), 330–2.Google Scholar
Meynell, G. G., ‘A database for John Locke’s medical notebooks and medical reading’, Medical History, 42 (1997), 473–86.Google Scholar
Meynell, G. G., ‘John Locke and the Preface to Thomas Sydenham’s Observationes medicae’, Medical History, 50 (2006), 93–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michael, E., ‘Daniel Sennert on matter and form. At the juncture of the old and the new’, ESM, 2 (1997), 272–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michael, E., ‘Sennert’s sea change: atoms and causes’, in Late medieval and early modern corpuscular matter theories, eds., Lüthy, C., Murdoch, J. E., and Newman, W. (Leiden, 2001), 331–62.Google Scholar
Michael, E., and Michael, F. S., ‘Gassendi on sensation and reflection: a non-Cartesian dualism’, History of European Ideas, 9 (1988), 583–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Micheli, G., ‘The history of philosophy in Germany in the second half of the seventeenth century’, in Santinello i, 371–476.Google Scholar
van Miert, D., ‘The limits of transconfessional contact in the Republic of Letters around 1600: Scaliger, Casaubon, and their Catholic correspondents’, in Between Scylla and Charybdis: learned letter writers navigating the reefs of religious and political controversy in early modern Europe, eds., De Landtsheer, J. and Nellen, H. (Leiden, 2011), 367–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikkeli, H., An Aristotelian response to Renaissance humanism: Jacopo Zabarella on the nature of the arts and sciencies (Helsinki, 1992).Google Scholar
Mikkeli, H., ‘The foundation of an autonomous natural philosophy: Zabarella on the classification of arts and sciences’, in Method and order in Renaissance philosophy of nature, eds., Di Liscia, D. A., Kessler, E., and Methuen, C. (Aldershot, 1998), 211–28.Google Scholar
Miller, J., ‘Innate ideas in Stoicism and Grotius’, in Grotius and the Stoa, eds., Blom, H. W. and Winkel, L. C. (Assen, 2004), 157–76.Google Scholar
Miller, P., ‘The “antiquarianisation” of Biblical scholarship and the London polyglot Bible (1653–57)’, JHI, 62 (2001), 463–82.Google Scholar
Miller, P., ‘Taking paganism seriously: anthropology and antiquarianism in early seventeenth-century histories of religion’, Archiv für Religionsgeschichte, 3 (2001), 183–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milton, A., Catholic and Reformed: The Roman and Protestant churches in English Protestant thought, 1600–1640 (Cambridge, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milton, A., ‘The creation of Laudianism: a new approach’, in Politics, religion and popularity in early Stuart Britain, eds. Cogswell, T., Cust, R., and Lake, P. (Cambridge, 2002), 162–84.Google Scholar
Milton, A., Laudian and royalist polemic in seventeenth-century England: the career and writings of Peter Heylyn (Manchester, 2007).Google Scholar
Milton, J. R., ‘Locke and Gassendi: a reappraisal’, in English philosophy in the age of Locke, ed. Stewart, M.A. (Oxford, 2000), 87–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minton, G. E., ‘Cave, William’, ODNB.Google Scholar
Mitchell, J., ‘Luther and Hobbes on the question: who was Moses, who was Christ?’, The Journal of Politics, 53 (1991), 676–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mittelstrass, J., ‘Nature and science in the Renaissance’, in Metaphysics and the philosophy of science in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, ed. Woolhouse, R. S. (Dordrecht, 1988), 17–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moody, M. E., ‘A man of a thousand: the reputation and character of Henry Ainsworth, 1569/70–1662’, Huntington Library Quarterly, 45 (1982), 200–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moraux, P., Der Aristotelismus bei den Griechen von Andronikos bis Alexander von Aphrodisias (2 vols, Berlin, 1975–84).Google Scholar
Morgan, J., Godly learning: Puritan attitudes towards reason, learning, and education, 1560–1640 (Cambridge, 1986).Google Scholar
Morgan, J., ‘Sprat, Thomas’, ODNB.Google Scholar
Morgan, J., ‘Science, England’s “Interest” and universal monarchy: the making of Thomas Sprat’s History of the Royal Society’, History of Science, 47 (2009), 27–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mortimer, S., Reason and religion in the English revolution: the challenge of Socinianism (Cambridge, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muccillo, M., ‘La storia della filosofia presocratica nelle “Discussiones peripateticae” di Francesco Patrizi da Cherso’, La cultura, 13 (1975), 48–105.Google Scholar
Muccillo, M., ‘La biblioteca greca di Francesco Patrizi’, in Bibliothecae selectae: da Cusano a Leopardi, ed. Canone, E. (Florence, 1993), 73–118.Google Scholar
Muccillo, M., Platonismo, Ermetismo e ‘Prisca Theologia’: ricerche di storiografia filosofica rinascimentale (Florence, 1996).Google Scholar
Muller, R. A., ‘The debate over the vowel points and the crisis in orthodox hermeneutics’, Journal of Medieval and Renaissance Studies, 10 (1980), 53–72.Google Scholar
Muller, R. A., ‘The Christological problem in the thought of Jacobus Arminius’, Nederlands Archief voor Kerkgeschiendenis, 68 (1988), 145–63.Google Scholar
Muller, R. A., After Calvin: studies in the development of a theological tradition (Oxford, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, R. A., Post-Reformation Reformed dogmatics: the rise and development of Reformed orthodoxy, ca. 1520 to ca. 1725 (4 vols, 2nd edn, Grand Rapids, 2003).Google Scholar
Mulligan, L., ‘“Reason”, “right reason”, and “revelation” in mid-seventeenth-century England’, in Occult and scientific mentalities in the Renaissance, ed. B. Vickers (Cambridge, 1984), 375–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulsow, M., ‘Orientalistik im Kontext der sozinianischen und deistischen Debatten um 1700. Spencer, Crell, Locke und Newton’, Scientia Poetica, 2 (1998), 27–57.Google Scholar
Mulsow, M., ‘Jacques Souverain, Samuel Crell et les cryptosociniens de Londres’, in J. Souverain, Letrre à Mr*** touchant l’apostasie, eds., Matton, S. and Labrousse, E. (Paris, 2000), 49–63.Google Scholar
Mulsow, M., ‘John Seldens De Diis Syris: Idolatriekritik und vergleichende Religionsgeschichte im 17 Jahrhundert’, Archiv für Religionsgeschichte, 3 (2001), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulsow, M., ‘Antiquarianism and idolatry: the “historia” of religions in the seventeenth century’, in Historia: empiricism and erudition in early modern Europe, eds., Pomata, G. and Siraisi, N. G. (Cambridge [MA], 2005), 181–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulsow, M., Moderne aus dem Untergrund: radikale Frühaufklärung in Deutschland 1680–1720 (Hamburg, 2002).Google Scholar
Mulsow, M., ‘The trinity as heresy: Socinian counter-histories of Simon Magus, Orpheus, and Cerinthus’, in Histories of heresy in early modern Europe, ed. Laursen, J. C. (New York, 2002), 161–70.Google Scholar
Mulsow, M., ‘A German Spinozistic reader of Cudworth, Bull, and Spencer: Johann Georg Wachter and his Theologia Martyrum (1712)’, in History of scholarship, eds., Ligota, C. and Quantin, J.-L. (Oxford, 2006), 357–85.Google Scholar
Mulsow, M., ‘Socinianism, Islam and the radical uses of Arabic scholarship’, Al-Qantara, 31 (2010), 549–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulsow, M., ed., Das Ende des Hermetismus: historische Kritik und neue Naturphilosophie in der Spätrenaissance: Dokumentation und Analyse der Debatten um die Datierung der hermetischen Schriften von Genebrard bis Casaubon (1567–1614) (Tübingen, 2002).Google Scholar
Mulsow, M., and Zedelmaier, H., eds., Die Praktiken der Gelehrsamkeit in der frühen Neuzeit (Tübingen, 2001).Google Scholar
Mulsow, M., and Assmann, J., eds., Sintflut und Gedächtnis: Erinnern und Vergessen des Ursprungs (Munich, 2006).Google Scholar
Mungello, D. E., Curious land: Jesuit accommodation and the origins of Sinology (Stuttgart, 1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munk, W., The Roll of the Royal College of Physicians of London, vol. i (London, 1861).Google Scholar
Murdoch, J. E., ‘Aristotle on Democritus’s argument against infinite divisibility in De generatione et corruptione, book I, Chapter 2’, in The commentary tradition on Aristotle’s ‘De generatione et corruptione’, eds., Thijssen, J. M. M. H. and Braakhuis, H. A. G. (Turnhout, 1999), 87–102.Google Scholar
Murdoch, J. E., ‘The medieval and Renaissance tradition of minima naturalia’, in Late medieval and early modern corpuscular matter theories, eds., Lüthy, C., Murdoch, J. E., and Newman, W. (Leiden, 2001), 91–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nardi, B., ‘La fine dell’averroismo’, in Saggi sull’aristotelismo padovano dal secolo XIV al XVI (Florence, 1958), 443–55.Google Scholar
Nauta, L., In defense of common sense: Lorenzo Valla’s humanist critique of scholastic philosophy (Cambridge [MA], 2009).Google Scholar
Neal, K., From discrete to continuous: the broadening of number concepts in early modern England (Dordrecht, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nellen, H. J. M., ‘De vitae termino. An epistolary survey by Johan van Beverwijck (1632–1639)’, in Acta Conventus Neo-Latini Hafniensis, eds., Moss, A., Dust, P., Schmidt, P. G., Chomarat, J., and Tateo, F. (Binghamton [NY], 1994), 731–40.Google Scholar
Nellen, H. J. M., ‘Growing tension between church doctrines and critical exegesis’, in Hebrew Bible/Old Testament: the history of its interpretation, vol. ii: from the Renaissance to the Enlightenment, ed. Saebø, M. (Göttingen, 2008), 802–26.Google Scholar
Nelson, E., The Hebrew republic: Jewish sources and the transformation of European political thought (Cambridge [MA], 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neuburger, M., ‘An historical survey of the concept of nature from a medical viewpoint’ Isis, 35 (1944), 16–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumann, H.-P., ‘Atome, Sonnenstäubchen, Monaden. Zum Pythagoreismus im 17. und 18. Jahrhundert’, in Auflklärund und Esoterik. Rezeption–Integration–Konfrontation, eds., Neugebauer-Wölk, M. and Rudolph, A. (Tübingen, 2008), 205–82.Google Scholar
Newman, W. R., ‘Thomas Vaughan as an interpreter of Agrippa von Nettesheim’, Ambix, 29 (1982), 125–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, W. R., Gehennical fire: the lives of George Starkey: an American alchemist in the scientific revolution (Chicago, 1994).Google Scholar
Newman, W. R., ‘The alchemical sources of Robert Boyle’s corpuscular philosophy’, Annals of Science, 53 (1996), 567–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, W. R., ‘Experimental corpuscular theory in Aristotelian alchemy: from Geber to Sennert’, in Late medieval and early modern corpuscular matter theories, eds., Lüthy, C., Murdoch, J. E., and Newman, W. (Leiden, 2001), 291–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, W. R., Atoms and alchemy: chymistry and the experimental origins of the scientific revolution (Chicago, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, W. R., ‘How not to integrate the history and philosophy of science: a reply to Chalmers’, SHPS, 41 (2010), 203–13.Google ScholarPubMed
Newman, W. R., and Principe, L. M., ‘Alchemy vs. chemistry: the etymological origins of a historiographic mistake’, ESM, 3 (1998), 32–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newman, W. R. and Principe, L. M., and Principe, L. M., Alchemy tried in the fire: Starkey, Boyle, and the fate of Helmontian chymistry (Chicago, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicolson, M. H., ‘Christ’s College and the latitude men’, Modern Philosophy, 27 (1929), 36–53.Google Scholar
Nielsen, O. L., ‘A seventeenth-century physician on God and atoms. Sebastian Basso’, in Meaning and inference in medieval philosophy, ed. Kretzmann, N. (Dordrecht, 1988), 297–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norman, L. F., The shock of the ancient: literature and history in early modern France (Chicago, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuovo, V., ‘Introduction’, in Locke, John, Vindications of the Reasonableness of Christianity, ed. Nuovo, V. (Oxford, 2012).Google Scholar
Nutton, V., ‘“Prisci dissectionum professores”: Greek texts and Renaissance anatomists’, in The uses of Greek and Latin: historical essays, eds., Dionisotti, A. C., Grafton, A., and Kraye, J. (London, 1988), 111–26.Google Scholar
Nutton, V., ‘Wittenberg anatomy’, in Medicine and the Reformation, eds., Grell, O. P. and Cunningham, A. (London, 1993), 11–32.Google Scholar
Oldroyd, D. R., ‘Some writings of Robert Hooke on procedures for the prosection of scientific inquiry, including his “Lectures of things requisite to a ntral history”’, NRRS, 41 (1987), 145–67.Google Scholar
Oldroyd, D. R., ‘Geological controversy in the seventeenth century: Hooke vs Wallis and its aftermath’, in Robert Hooke: new studies, eds., Hunter, M. and Schaffer, S. (Woodbridge, 1989), 207–33.Google Scholar
Osborn, J. M., ‘Thomas Stanley’s lost “Register of Friends”’, Yale University Library Gazette (1958), 1–26.Google Scholar
Osborne, C., ‘Ralph Cudworth’s The true intellectual system of the universe and the presocratic philosophers’, in The presocratics from the Latin middle ages to Hermann Diels, eds., Primavesi, O. and Luchner, K. (Stuttgart, 2011), 215–235.Google Scholar
Osler, M. J., ‘Baptizing Epicurean atomism: Pierre Gassendi on the immortality of the soul’, in Religion, science, and worldview, eds., Osler, M. J. and Farber, P. L. (Cambridge, 1985), 163–83.Google Scholar
Osler, M. J., ‘Introduction’, in Atoms, pneuma, and tranquitlity: Epicurean and Stoic themes in European thought, ed. Osler, M. J. (Cambridge, 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osler, M. J., ‘Ancients, moderns and the history of philosophy: Gassendi’s Epicurean project’, in The rise of modern Philosophy, ed. Sorell, T. (Oxford, 1993).Google Scholar
Osler, M. J., Divine will and the mechanical philosophy: Gassendi and Descartes on contingency and necessity in the created world (Cambridge, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osler, M. J., ‘From immanent natures to nature as artifice: the reinterpretation of final causes in seventeenth-century natural philosophy’, The Monist, 79 (1996), 388–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osler, M. J., ‘When did Gassendi become a libertine?’, in Heterdoxy in early modern science and religion, eds., Brooke, J. H and Maclean, I. (Oxford, 2005), 169–92.Google Scholar
Oster, M., ‘Highmore, Nathaniel’, ODNB.Google Scholar
Packer, J., The transformation of Anglicanism, 1643–1660: with special reference to Henry Hammond (Manchester, 1969).Google Scholar
Pagel, W., ‘The reaction to Aristotle in seventeenth-century biological thought: Campanella, Van Helmont, Glanvill, Charleton, Harvey, Glisson, Descartes’, in Science, medicine and history, ed. Underwood, E. A. (2 vols, Oxford, 1953), i, 489–509.Google Scholar
Pagel, W., ‘Harvey and Glisson on irritability: with a note on van Helmont’, Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 41 (1967), 497–514.Google ScholarPubMed
Pagel, W., Paracelsus: an introduction to philosophical medicine in the era of the Renaissance (2nd rev. edn, Basel, 1982).Google Scholar
Pagel, W., Joan Baptista van Helmont: reformer of science and medicine (Cambridge, 1982).Google Scholar
Palmerino, C. R., ‘Pierre Gassendi’s De Philosophia Epicuri Universi rediscovered’, Nuntius, 14 (1998), 131–62.Google Scholar
Parente, F., ‘Spencer, Maimonides, and the history of religion’, in History of scholarship, eds., Ligota, C. and Quantin, J.-L. (Oxford, 2006), 277–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parenty, H., Isaac Casaubon, Helléniste: Des studia humanitatis à la philologie (Geneva, 2009).Google Scholar
Parkin, J., Science, religion and politics in Restoration England: Richard Cumberland’s De Legibus Naturae (Woodbridge, 1999).Google Scholar
Parkin, J., ‘Hobbism in the later 1660s: Daniel Scargill and Samuel Parker’, HJ, 42 (1999), 85–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parkin, J., ‘Pierce, Thomas’, ODNB.Google Scholar
Parry, G., The trophies of time: English antiquarians of the seventeenth century (Oxford, 1995).Google Scholar
Parry, G., ‘Thomas Browne and the uses of antiquity’, in Sir Thomas Browne: the world proposed (Oxford, 2008), 63–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Partington, J. R., ‘The life and work of John Mayow’, Isis, 47 (1956), 217–30, 405–17.Google ScholarPubMed
Pasnau, R., ‘Form, substance, and mechanism’, The Philosophical Review, 113 (2004), 31–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pattison, M., ‘Tendencies of religious thought in England from 1688 to 1750’, Essays and reviews (London, 1860).Google Scholar
Payne, L. M., ‘Sir Charles Scarburgh’s Harveian Oration, 1662’, Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, 12 (1957), 158–64.Google ScholarPubMed
Péllisier, L. G., ‘Les amis d’Holstenius’, Revue des Langues Romanes, 35 (1891), 321–78, 503–47.Google Scholar
Pelseneer, J., ‘Une opinion inédite de Newton sur l’analyse des anciens’ à propos de l’Analysis Geometrica de Hugo de Omerique’, Isis, 14 (1930), 155–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perani, M., Gugliemo Raimondo Moncada alias Flavio Mitridate. Un ebreo converso siciliano (Palermo, 2008).Google Scholar
Perilli, L., Menodoto di Nicomedia: contributo a una storia Galeniana della medicina empirica (Leipzig, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersson, R. T., Sir Kenelm Digby, the ornament of England, 1603–1665 (London, 1956).Google Scholar
Petit, A., ‘Ralph Cudworth, un platonisme paradoxal: la nature dans la Digression concerning the plastick life of nature’, in The Cambridge Platonists in philosophical context, eds. Rogers, G. A. J., Vienne, J.-M., and Zarka, Y.-C. (Dordrecht, 1997), 101–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfeiffer, R., History of classical scholarship: from the beginnings to the end of the Hellenistic Age (Oxford, 1968).Google Scholar
Philip, I. G., ‘Letter from Thomas Hyde, Bodley’s librarian, 1665–1701’, The Bodleian Library Record, 3 (1950–51), 40–5.Google Scholar
Piaia, G., ‘The histories of philosophy in France in the age of Descartes’, in Santinello ii, 3–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piaia, G., ‘Philosophical historiography in France from Bayle to Deslandes’, in Santinello ii, 93–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piaia, G., ‘Cartesianism and history: from the rejection of the past to a “critical” history of philosophy’, in Translatio Studiorum: ancient, medieval and modern bearers of intellectual history, ed. Sgarbi, M. (Leiden, 2012), 141–54.Google Scholar
Pigney, S., ‘Theophilus Gale (1628–79), nonconformist scholar and intellectual: an introduction to his life and writings’, Journal of the United Reformed Church History Society, 7 (2007), 407–20.Google Scholar
Pigney, S., ‘Theophilus Gale and historiography of philosophy’, in Insiders and outsiders in seventeenth-century philosophy, eds. Rogers, G. A. J., Sorell, T., and Kraye, J. (New York and Oxford, 2010), 76–99.Google Scholar
Pitassi, M. C., Entre croire et savoir. Le problème de la méthode critique chez Jean Le Clerc (Leiden, 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pluta, O., ‘The transformations of Alexander of Aphrodisias’ interpretation of Aristotle’s theory of the soul’, in Renaissance readings of the Corpus Aristotelicum, ed. Pade, M. (Copenhagen, 2001), 147–66.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A., The ancient constitution and the feudal law: a study of English historical thought in the seventeenth century (Cambridge, 1957; reissued with a retrospect, 1987).Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A., ‘Post-puritan England and the problem of the enlightenment’, in Culture and politics from puritanism to the enlightenment, ed. Zagorin, P. (Berkeley, 1980), 91–111.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A., ‘Clergy and commerce: the conservative enlightenment in England’, in L’età dei lumi, eds., Ajello, R., Cortese, E., and Mortari, V. P. (2 vols, Naples, 1985), i, 523–68.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A., ‘Within the margins: the definitions of orthodoxy’, in The margins of orthodoxy: heterodox writing and cultural response, 1660–1750, ed. Lund, R. D. (Cambridge, 1995), 33–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A., ‘Historiography and enlightenment: a view of their history’, Modern Intellectual History, 5 (2008), 83–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A., Barbarism and religion, vol. v. Religion: the first triumph (Cambridge, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A., ‘Review of S. Pincus, 1688: The first modern revolution’, Common Knowledge, 17 (2011), 186–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pocock, N., ‘Illustrations of the state and church during the Great Rebellion’, The Theologian and Ecclesiastic, 9 (1850).Google Scholar
Pomata, G., and Siraisi, N. G., eds., Historia: empiricism and erudition in early modern Europe, (Cambridge [MA], 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, H. H., ‘Milner, John’, ODNB.Google Scholar
Poole, W., ‘Two early readers of Milton: John Beale and Abraham Hill’, Milton Quarterly, 38 (2004), 76–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, W., ‘Francis Lodwick’s creation: theology and natural philosophy in the early Royal Society’, JHI, 66 (2005), 245–63.Google Scholar
Poole, W., ‘The Genesis narrative in the circle of Robert Hooke and Francis Lodwick’, in Scripture and scholarship in early modern England, eds. Hessayon, A. and Keene, N. (Aldershot, 2006), 41–58.Google Scholar
Poole, W., ‘Sir Robert Southwell’s dialogue on Thomas Burnet’s theory of the earth: “C & S discourse of Mr Burnetts Theory of the Earth” (1684): contexts and an edition’, The Seventeenth Century, 23 (2008), 72–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, W., The world makers: scientists of the Restoration and the search for the origins of the earth (Oxford, 2010).Google Scholar
Poole, W., ‘The evolution of George Hakewill’s Apologie or declaration of the power and providence of God, 1627–1637: academic contexts, and some new angles from manuscripts’, Electronic British Library Journal (2010), Article 7.Google Scholar
Poole, W., ‘Heterodoxy and Sinology: Isaac Vossius, Robert Hooke and the early Royal Society’s use of Sinology’, in The intellectual consequences of religious heterodoxy 1600–1750, eds., Mortimer, S. and Robertson, J. (Leiden, 2012), 134–54.Google Scholar
Poole, W., ‘Loans from the library of Sir Edward Sherburne and the 1685 English translation of Xenophon’, The Library, 14 (2013), 80–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, W., ‘John Fell’s New Year Books again’ (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Popkin, R. H., ‘Newton and Maimonides’, in A straight path: studies in medieval philosophy and culture (Washington, 1988), 216–29.Google Scholar
Popkin, R. H., ‘Some further comments on Newton and Maimonides’, in Essays on the context, nature, and influence of Isaac Newton’s theology, eds., Force, J. E. and Popkin, R. H. (Dordrecht, 1990), 1–8.Google Scholar
Popkin, R. H., ‘The crisis of polytheism and the answers of Vossius, Cudworth and Newton’, in Essays on the context, nature, and influence of Isaac Newton’s theology, eds., Force, J. E. and Popkin, R. H. (Dordrecht, 1990), 9–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popkin, R. H., ‘Polytheism, deism and Newton’, in Essays on the context, nature, and influence of Isaac Newton’s theology, eds., Force, J. E. and Popkin, R. H. (Dordrecht, 1990), 27–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popper, N., ‘“Abraham, Planter of Mathematics”: histories of mathematics and astrology in early modern Europe’, JHI, 67 (2006), 87–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popper, N., Walter Ralegh’s History of the world and the historical culture of the late Renaissance (Chicago, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, R., The making of geology: earth science in Britain 1660–1815 (Cambridge, 1977).Google Scholar
Porter, S., ‘University and society’, in The history of the University of Oxford, vol. iv: seventeenth-century Oxford, ed. Tyacke, N. (Oxford, 1997), 25–104.Google Scholar
Potter, A. C., The library of Harvard University: descriptive and historical notes (3rd edn, Cambridge [MA], 1915 [1st edn=1903]).Google Scholar
Praz, M., ‘Stanley, Sherburne and Ayres as translators and imitators of Italian, Spanish and French poets’, Modern Language Review, 20 (1925), 280–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Primavesi, O., ‘Henri II Estienne über philosophische Dichtung: Eine Fragmentsammlung als Beitrag zu einer poetologischen Kontroverse’, in The presocractics from the Latin Middle Ages to Hermann Diels, eds. Primavesi, O. and Luchner, K. (Stuttgart, 2011), 157–96.Google Scholar
Principe, L. M., ‘Virtuous romance and romantic virtuoso: the shaping of Robert Boyle’s literary style’, JHI, 56 (1995), 377–97.Google Scholar
Principe, L. M., The aspiring adept: Robert Boyle and his alchemical quest (New Jersey, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Principe, L. M., ‘Castle, George’, ODNB.Google Scholar
Principe, L. M., ‘Dickinson, Edmund’, ODNB.Google Scholar
Prosperi, V., Di soavi licor gli orli del vaso: La fortuna di Lucrezio dal l’Umanismo alla Controriforma (Turin, 2004).Google Scholar
Puliafito, A. L., ‘Searching for a new physics: metaphysics of light and ancient knowledge in Francesco Patrizi da Cherso’, in Magia, alchimia, scienza dal ’400 al ’700: L’influsso di Ermete Trismegisto, eds., Gilly, C. and van Heertum, C. (2 vols, Florence, 2002), 237–51.Google Scholar
Pumfrey, S., ‘The spagyric art: or, the impossible work of separating pure from impure Paracelsianism: a historiographical analysis’, in Paracelsus: the man and his reputation, his ideas and their transformation, ed. Grell, O. P. (Leiden, 1998), 21–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quantin, J.-L., Le catholicisme classique et les pères de l’église: un retour aux sources (1669–1713) (Paris, 1999).Google Scholar
Quantin, J.-L., ‘Document, histoire, critique dans l’érudition ecclésiastique des temps modernes’, Recherches de Science Religieuse 92 (2004), 597–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quantin, J.-L., ‘Un manuel anti-patristique: context et signification du Traité de l’emploi des saints Pères de Jean Daillé (1632)’, in Die Patristik in der frühen Neuzeit, eds., Frank, G., Leinkauf, T., and Wried, M. (Stuttgart, 2006), 299–325.Google Scholar
Quantin, J.-L., ‘L’Orthodoxie, la censure et la gloire: la difficile édition princeps de l’épître de Barnabé, de Rome à Amsterdam (1549–1646)’, in ‘Editiones principes’ delle opera dei padri greci e latini (Florence, 2006), 103–62.Google Scholar
Quantin, J.-L., ‘Anglican scholarship gone mad? Henry Dodwell (1641–1711) and Christian antiquity’, in History of scholarship, eds., Ligota, C. and Quantin, J.-L. (Oxford, 2006), 305–56.Google Scholar
Quantin, J.-L., ‘Du Chrysostome latin au Chrysostome grec: une histoire européene (1518–1613)’, in Chrysostomosbilder in 1600 Jahren: Facetten der Wirkungsgeschichte eines Kirchenvaters (Berlin, 2008), 267–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quantin, J.-L., The Church of England and Christian antiquity: the construction of a confessional identity in the 17th century (Oxford, 2009).Google Scholar
Quantin, J.-L., ‘John Selden et l’étude de l’Antiquité chrétienne: Érudition, critique et anticléricalisme’, Annuaire de l’institute Michel Villey, 3 (2011), 339–90.Google Scholar
Quantin, J.-L., ‘Reason and reasonableness in French ecclesiastical scholarship’, Huntington Library Quarterly, 74 (2011), 401–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Quehen, H., ‘Politics and scholarship in the Ignatian controversy’, Seventeenth Century, 13 (1998), 69–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Quehen, H., ‘Bentley, Richard’, ODNB.Google Scholar
de Quehen, H., ‘Prideaux, Humphrey’, ODNB.Google Scholar
de Quehen, H., ‘Sherburne, Edward’, ODNB.Google Scholar
Rademaker, C. S. M., Life and work of Gerardus Joannes Vossius (1577–1649) (Assen, 1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rademaker, C. S. M., and van der Lem, G. A. K., Inventory of the correspondence of Gerardus Joannes Vossius (1577–1649) (Assen, 1993).Google Scholar
Ramsey, R., ‘China and the ideal of order in John Webb’s An Historical Essay’, JHI, 62 (2001), 483–503.Google Scholar
Rapp, C., ‘Friedrich Nietzsche and pre-Platonic philosophy’, in The presocratics from the Latin middle ages to Hermann Diels, eds., Primavesi, O. and Luchner, K. (Stuttgart, 2011), 335–58.Google Scholar
Rappaport, R., ‘Hooke on earthquakes: lectures, strategy and audience’, BJHS, 19 (1986), 129–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rappaport, R., ‘Questions of evidence: an anonymous tract attributed to John Toland’, JHI, 58 (1997), 339–48.Google Scholar
Rattansi, P. M., ‘The Helmontian-Galenist controversy in Restoration England’, Ambix, 12 (1964), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raylor, T., ‘Hobbes, Payne, and a Short tract on first principles’, HJ, 44 (2001), 29–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reedy, G., The Bible and reason: Anglicans and scripture in late seventeenth-century England (Philadelphia, 1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reedy, G., Robert South (1634–1716): an introduction to his life and sermons (Cambridge, 1992).Google Scholar
Rees, G. ‘Atomism and “subtlety” in Francis Bacon’s philosophy’, Annals of science, 37 (1980), 549–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rees, G., and Wakely, M., ‘Introduction’, in The Instauratio magna Part II: Novum organum and associated texts, eds. Reeve, M. D. and Wakely, M. (=OFB, xi) (Oxford, 2004).Google Scholar
Rees, G. and Wakely, M., ‘Acidalius on Manilius’, The Classical Quarterly, 41 (1991), 226–39.Google Scholar
Rehnman, S., ‘John Owen: a Reformed scholastic at Oxford’, in Reformation and scholasticism: an ecumenical enterprise, eds., van Asselt, W. J. and Dekker, E. (Grand Rapids, 2001), 181–204.Google Scholar
Rehnman, S., Divine discourse: the theological methodology of John Owen (Grand Rapids, 2002).Google Scholar
Reid, J., ‘The evolution of Henry More’s theory of divine absolute space’, JHP, 45 (2007), 79–102.Google Scholar
Reif, S. C., Hebrew manuscripts at Cambridge University Library: a description and introduction (Cambridge, 1997).Google Scholar
Reiner, H., ‘Die Entstehung der Lehre vom bibliothekarischen Ursprung des Namens Metaphysik. Geschichie einer Wissenschaftslegende’, Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung, 9 (1955), 77–99.Google Scholar
Repetzki, M. M., ‘Preface’, in John Evelyn’s translation of Titus Lucretius Carus de rerum natura: an old-spelling critical edition (Frankfurt, 2000).Google Scholar
Revard, S., ‘Translation and imitation of Joannes Secundus’ Basia during the era of the civil war and protectorate in England’, Acta Conventus Neo-Latini Abulensis (Tempe [AR], 2000), 553–61.Google Scholar
Revard, S., ‘Thomas Stanley and “A Register of Friends”’, in Literary circles and cultural communities in Renaissance England, eds., Summers, C. J. and Pebworth, T.-L. (New York and London, 2000), 148–172.Google Scholar
Reventlow, H. G., ‘English deism and anti-deist apologetic’, in Hebrew Bible/Old Testament: the history of its interpretation, vol. ii: from the Renaissance to the Enlightenment, ed. Saebø, M. (Göttingen, 2008), 851–74.Google Scholar
Reverdin, O., ‘Isaac Casaubon et Genève de 1596 à 1614’, in Mélanges offerts à M. Paul-E. Martin par ses amis, ses collègues et ses élèves (Geneva, 1961), 503–21.Google Scholar
Reverdin, O., ‘En guise d’épilogue: Brève évocation de la Ποίησις φιλόσοφος (Poesis Philosophica), recueil composé et imprimé à Genève, en 1573, par Henri Estienne’, in Hermann Diels (1848–1922) et la Science de L’antiquité, eds., Calder, W. M. III and Mansfeld, J. (Geneva, 1999), 295–8.Google Scholar
Reynolds, L. D., and Wilson, N., Scribes and scholars: a guide to the transmission of Greek and Latin literature (Oxford, 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rietbergen, P., Power and religion in Baroque Rome: Barberini cultural policies (Leiden, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivers, I., Reason, grace, and sentiment: a study of the language of religion and ethics in England, 1660–1780 (2 vols, Cambridge, 1991).Google Scholar
Roberts, R. S., ‘Jonathan Goddard. Discourse concerning physick and the many abuses thereof by apothecaries, 1668: A lost work or a ghost?’ Medical History, 8 (1964), 190–1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, H. W., ‘An unpublished letter of Dr Seth Ward relating to the early meetings of the Oxford Philosophical Society’, NRRS, 7 (1950), 68–71.Google Scholar
Roger, J., ‘The Cartesian model and its role in eighteenth-century “Theories of the earth”’, in Problems of Cartesianism, eds., Lennon, T., Nicholas, J., and Davis, J. (Kingston, 1982), 95–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roitman, A. D., ‘“This people are descendants of Chaldeans” (Judith 5:6): its literary form and historical setting’, Journal of Biblical Literature, 113 (1994), 245–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rolet, S., ‘Invention et exégèse symbolique à la Renaissance: Le “tombeau d’Aureolus” dans les Antiquitates Mediolanenses d’Alciat et les Hieroglyphica de Valeriano’, Albertiana, 5 (2002), 109–40.Google Scholar
Romano, A., ‘Crispo, Giovan Battista’, in Dizionario biografico degli Italiani (Rome, 1960–), xxx, 806–8.Google Scholar
van Rooden, P. T., Theology, biblical scholarship, and rabbinical studies in the seventeenth century: Constantijn L’Empereur (1591–1648), professor of Hebrew and theology at Leiden (Leiden, 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roos, A. M., The salt of the earth: natural philosophy, medicine, and chymistry in England, 1650–1750 (Leiden, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roos, A. M., Web of nature: Martin Lister (1639–1712), the first arachnologist (Leiden, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, J., ‘The ecclesiastical polity of Samuel Parker’, The Seventeenth Century, 25 (2010), 350–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, P. L., and Drake, S., ‘The pseudo-Aristotelian Questions of Mechanics in Renaissance culture’, Studies in the Renaissance, 18 (1971), 65–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenblatt, J. P., Renaissance England’s chief rabbi: John Selden (Oxford, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossi, P., Francis Bacon: from magic to science, trans. Rabinovitch, S. (London, 1968 [Italian original= 1957]).Google Scholar
Rossi, P., ‘Sulle origini dell’idea di progresso’, in Immagini della scienza (Roma, 1977), 15–69.Google Scholar
Rossi, P., ‘Francesco Bacone e la tradizione filosofica’, Atti dell’Istituto Lombardo di scienze e lettere, 88 (1955), 33–93.Google Scholar
Rossi, P., The dark abyss of time: the history of the earth and the history of nations from Hooke to Vico, trans., Cochrane, L. (Chicago, 1984 [Italian orig.=1979]).Google Scholar
Ruelle, C. A., ‘Praefatio’, in Damascii Successoris … De primis principiis, in Platonis Parmenidem, ed. Ruelle, C. A. (Paris, 1889), i–xxi.Google Scholar
Runia, D. T., ‘What is doxography?’, in Ancient histories of medicine: essays in medical doxography and historiography in classical antiquity, ed. van der Eijk, P. J. (Leiden, 1999), 33–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runia, D. T., and Mansfield, J., Aëtiana: the method and intellectual context of a doxographer. Vol. i: the sources (Leiden, 1997), 1–41.Google Scholar
Sachau, E., ‘Contributions to the knowledge of Parsee literature’, Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, 4 (1869), 229–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sakamoto, K., ‘Creation, the trinity and prisca theologia in Julius Caesar Scaliger’, JWCI, 73 (2010), 195–207.Google Scholar
Salaman, C., ‘Echoes of Egypt in Hermes and Ficino’, in Marsilio Ficino: his theology, his philosophy, his legacy, eds., Allen, M. J. B. and Rees, V. (Leiden, 2001), 115–36.Google Scholar
Sankey, M. D., ‘Sheffield, John’, ODNB.Google Scholar
Santinello, G., ed., Storia delle storie generali della filosofia: Delle origini rinascimentali alla ‘historia philosophica’ (Brescia, 1981), trans. as Santinello i.Google Scholar
Santinello, G., ed., Storia delle storie generali della filosofia: Dall’eta cartesiana a Brucker, trans. as Santinello ii.Google Scholar
Santinello, G., ed., Storia delle storie generali della filosofia: Il secondo illuminismo e l’età kantiana (Padua, 1988).Google Scholar
Santinello, G., ed., Storia delle storie generali della filosofia: L’età hegeliana (1995, 2004).Google Scholar
Santinello, G., ed., Storia delle storie generali della filosofia: Il secondo Ottocento (Rome, 2004).Google Scholar
Sargent, R.-M., The diffident naturalist: Robert Boyle and the philosophy of experiment (Chicago, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saveson, J. E., ‘Descartes’ influence on John Smith, Cambridge Platonist’, JHI, 20 (1959), 258–63.Google Scholar
Saveson, J. E., ‘Differing reactions to Descartes among the Cambridge Platonists’, JHI, 21 (1960), 560–7.Google Scholar
Scheible, H., Die Entstehung der Magdeburger Zenturien. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der historiographischen Methode (Gütersloh, 1966).Google Scholar
Schepelern, H. D., ‘Introduction’, in Olai Borrichii itinerarium 1660–1665: the journal of the Danish polyhistor Ole Borch, ed. H. D. Schepelern (Copenhagen, 1983), vii–xliii.Google Scholar
Schironi, F., From Alexandria to Babylon: near eastern languages and Hellenistic erudition in the Oxyrhynchus glossary (Berlin, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, F., ‘The Hasidaeans and the ancient Jewish “sects”: a seventeenth-century controversy’, in Sects and sectarianism in Jewish history, ed. Stern, S. (Leiden, 2011), 187–204.Google Scholar
Schmidt-Biggemann, W., Philosophia perennis: historical outlines of Western spirituality in ancient, medieval and early modern thought (Dordrecht, 2004).Google Scholar
Schmidt-Biggemann, W., ‘History and prehistory of the Cabala of JHSUS’, in Hebrew to Latin, Latin to Hebrew: the mirroring of two cultures in the age of humanism, ed. Busi, G. (Berlin, 2006), 223–41.Google Scholar
Schmidt-Biggemann, W., Geschichte der christlichen Kabbala. 15. und 16. Jahrhundert (Stuttgart, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt-Biggemann, W., and Stammen, T., eds., Jacob Brucker (1696–1770): Philosoph und Historiker der europäischen Aufklärung (Berlin, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, C. B., ‘Aristotle as a cuttlefish: the origin and development of an image’, Studies in the Renaissance, 12 (1965), 60–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, C. B., Gianfrancesco Pico della Mirandola (1469–1533) and his critique of Aristotle (The Hague, 1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, C. B., Cicero Scepticus: a study of the influence of the Academica in the Renaissance (The Hague, 1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, C. B., ‘The rediscovery of ancient skepticism in modern times’, in The skeptical tradition, ed. Burnyeat, M. F. (Berkeley, 1983), 225–51.Google Scholar
Schmitt, C. B., The Aristotelian tradition and the Renaissance universities (London, 1984).Google Scholar
Schmitt, C. B., ‘William Harvey and Renaissance Aristotelianism: a consideration of the Praefatio to “De generatione animalium” (1651)’, in Humanismus und Medizin, eds., Keil, G. and Schmitz, R. (Winheim, 1984), 117–38.Google Scholar
Schmitt, C. B., ‘Aristotle among the physicians’, in The medical Renaissance of the sixteenth century, eds., Wear, A., French, R. K., and Lonie, I. M. (Cambridge, 1985), 1–15.Google Scholar
Schmitt, C. B., ‘The rise of the philosophical textbook’, in The Cambridge history of Renaissance philosophy, eds., Schmitt, C. B. and Skinner, Q. (Cambridge, 1988), 792–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, C. B., and Cranz, F. E., A Bibliography of Aristotle Editions, 1501–1600 (2nd edn, Baden-Baden, 1984).Google Scholar
Schneider, U. J., ‘Eclecticism and the history of philosophy’, History and the disciplines: the reclassification of knowledge in early modern Europe, ed. Kelley, D. R. (Rochester, 1997), 83–102.Google Scholar
Schochet, G., ‘Between Lambeth and Leviathan: Samuel Parker on the church of England and political order’, in Political discourse in early-modern Britain, eds., Phillipson, N. and Skinner, Q. (Cambridge, 1993), 189–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholem, G., ‘The beginnings of the Christian Kabbalah’, in The Christian Kabbalah: Jewish mystical books and their Christian interpreters, ed. Dan, J. (Cambridge [MA], 1997), 17–51.Google Scholar
Schuler, R. M., ‘Some spiritual alchemies of seventeenth-century England’, JHI, 41 (1980), 293–318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schüller, V., Newtons Scholia aus David Gregorys Nachlaß zu den Propositionen IV–IX Buch III seiner Principia (Berlin, 2000).Google Scholar
Schüller, V., ‘Newton’s scholia from David Gregory’s estate on the propositions IV through IX book III of his Principia’, in Between Leibniz, Newton, and Kant: philosophy and science in the eighteenth century, ed. Lefèvre, W. (Dordrecht, 2001), 213–65.Google Scholar
Schuster, J. A., ‘“Waterworld”: Descartes’ vortical celestial mechanics—a gambit in the natural philosophical contest of the early seventeenth century’, in The science of nature in the seventeenth century: patterns of change in early modern natural philosophy, eds. Anstey, P. and Schuster, J. (Dordrecht, 2005), 35–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Secret, F., ‘Gilbert Gaulmin et l’histoire comparée des religions’, Revue de l’histoire des religions, 177 (1970), 35–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedley, D., ‘Physics and metaphysics’, in The Cambridge history of Hellenistic philosophy, eds., Algra, K., Barnes, J., Mansfeld, J., and Schofield, M. (Cambridge, 1999), 355–411.Google Scholar
Sellars, J., ‘Is God a mindless vegetable? Cudworth on Stoic theology’, IHR, 21 (2011), 121–33.Google Scholar
Sellars, J., ‘Stoics against Stoics in Cudworth’s A treatise of freewill’, BJHP, 20 (2012), 935–52.Google Scholar
Serjeantson, R. W., ‘Introduction’, in Generall learning: A seventeenth-century treatise on the formation of the General Scholar by Meric Casaubon, ed. Serjeantson, R. (Cambridge, 1999), 1–65.Google Scholar
Serjeantson, R. W., ‘Herbert of Cherbury before deism: the early reception of De Veritate’, The Seventeenth Century, 16 (2001), 217–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serjeantson, R. W., ‘Thomas Farnaby’, in British rhetoricians and logicians, 1500–1660, ed. Malone, E. A. (Detroit, 2001), 108–16.Google Scholar
Serjeantson, R. W., ‘Hobbes, the universities, and the history of philosophy’, in The philosopher in early modern Europe, eds., Condren, C., Gaukroger, S., and Hunter, I. (Cambridge, 2006), 113–39.Google Scholar
Serjeantson, R. W., ‘“Human understanding” and the genre of Locke’s Essay’, IHR, 18 (2008), 157–71.Google Scholar
Serjeantson, R. W., ‘David Hume’s Natural history of religion (1757) and the end of modern Eusebianism’, The intellectual consequences of religious heterodoxy, eds., Robertson, J. and Mortimer, S. (Leiden, 2011), 267–96.Google Scholar
Serjeantson, R. W., ‘The soul’, in The Oxford handbook of philosophy in early modern Europe, eds., Clarke, D. M. and Wilson, C. (Oxford, 2011), 119–41.Google Scholar
Serjeantson, R. W., ‘Becoming a philosopher in seventeenth-century Britain’, in The Oxford handbook of British philosophy in the seventeenth century, ed. P. Anstey (Oxford, 2013), 9–38.Google Scholar
Serjeantson, R. W., ‘The philosophy of Francis Bacon in early Jacobean Oxford, with an edition of an uknown manuscript of the Valerius Terminus’, HJ, 56 (2013), 1087–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serjeantson, R. W., ‘The education of Francis Willughby’ (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Sgarbi, M., The Aristotelian tradition and the rise of British empiricism: logic and epistemology in the British Isles (1570–1689) (Dordrecht, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shackelford, J., A philosophical path for Paracelsian medicine: the ideas, intellectual context, and influence of Petrus Severinus (1540/2–1602) (Copenhagen, 2004).Google Scholar
Shalev, Z., ‘Measurer of all things: John Greaves (1602–1652), the Great Pyramid, and early modern metrology’, JHI, 63 (2002), 555–75.Google Scholar
Shalev, Z., Sacred words and worlds: geography, religion, and scholarship, 1550–1700 (Leiden, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapin, S., ‘Robert Boyle and mathematics: reality, representation, and experimental practice’, Science in Context, 2 (1988), 23–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapin, S., A social history of truth: civility and science in seventeenth-century England (Chicago, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapin, S., and Schaffer, S., Leviathan and the air-pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the experimental life (Princeton, 1985).Google Scholar
Shapiro, B. J., John Wilkins, 1614–1672: an intellectual biography (Berkeley, 1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, B. J., Probability and certainty in seventeenth-century England (Princeton, 1983).Google Scholar
Sharp, L., ‘Walter Charleton’s early life, 1620–1659, and relationship to natural philosophy in mid-seventeenth century England’, Annals of Science, 30 (1973), 311–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sharples, R. W., ‘Strato of Lampsacus: the sources. Texts and translations’, in Strato of Lampsacus: text, translation, and discussion, eds., Desclos, M.-L and Fortenbaugh, W. W. (New Jersey, 2011), 5–230.Google Scholar
Sheehan, J., ‘Sacred and profane: idolatry, antiquarianism and the polemics of distinction in the seventeenth century’, Past and Present, 192 (2006), 35–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shelford, A. G., Transforming the republic of letters: Pierre-Daniel Huet and European intellectual life, 1650–1720 (Rochester, 2007).Google Scholar
Shelford, A. G., ‘Thinking geometrically in Pierre-Daniel Huet’s Demonstratio evangelica (1679)’, JHI, 63 (2002), 599–617.Google Scholar
Sherlock, P., ‘Bysshe, Sir Edward’, ODNB.Google Scholar
Shuger, D. K., The Renaissance Bible: scholarship, sacrifice and subjectivity (Berkeley, 1998).Google Scholar
Sicherl, M., Die Handschriften, Ausgaben und Übersetzungen von Iamblichos ‘De Mysteriis’ (Berlin, 1957).Google Scholar
Silk, M., ‘Numa Pompilius and the idea of civil religion in the West’, Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 72 (2004), 863–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siniossoglou, N., Plato and Theodoret: the Christian appropriation of Platonic philosophy and the Hellenic intellectual resistance (Cambridge, 2008).Google Scholar
Siraisi, N., ‘Giovanni Argenterio and sixteenth-century medical innovation: between princely patronage and academic controversy’, Osiris, 2.6 (1990), 161–80.Google Scholar
Siraisi, N., The clock and the mirror: Girolamo Cardano and Renaissance medicine (Princeton, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siraisi, N., ‘In search of the origins of medicine: Egyptian medicine and some Renaissance physicians’, in Inventing genealogies, eds., Finucci, V. and Brownlee, K. (Durham [NC], 2001), 235–61.Google Scholar
Siraisi, N., History, medicine, and the traditions of Renaissance learning (Ann Arbor, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siraisi, N., ‘Medicine, 1450–1620, and the history of science’, Isis, 103 (2012), 491–514.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slusser, M., ‘Abraham Woodhead (1608–78): some research notes, chiefly about his writings’, Recusant History, 15 (1971–81), 406–22.Google Scholar
Small, A., and Small, C., ‘John Evelyn and the garden of Epicurus’, JWCI, 60 (1997), 194–214.Google Scholar
Smith, C. F., ‘Jane Lead’s wisdom: women and prophecy in seventeenth-century England’, Poetic prophecy in Western literature, eds., Wojcik, J. and Frontain, R. J. (Michigan, 1984), 55–63.Google Scholar
Smith, J. E. H., ed., The problem of animal generation in early modern philosophy (Cambridge, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J. E. H., ‘Introduction’, in The problem of animal generation in early modern philosophy, ed. Smith, J. E. H. (Cambridge, 2006), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J. Z., Drudgery divine. On the comparison of early Christianities and the religions of late antiquity (Chicago, 1990).Google Scholar
Smith, N., ‘“And if God was one of us”: Paul Best, John Biddle, and anti-trinitarian heresy in seventeenth-century England’, in Heresy, literature and politics in early modern English culture, eds., Loewenstein, D. and Marshall, J. (Cambridge, 2006), 160–84.Google Scholar
Smith, P. H., ‘Science on the move: recent trends in the history of early modern science’, Renaissance Quarterly, 62 (2009), 345–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snobelen, S. D., ‘“God of Gods, and Lord of Lords”: the theology of Isaac Newton’s General Scholium to the Principia’, Osiris, 16 (2001), 169–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snobelen, S. D., ‘“Not in the language of astronomers”: Isaac Newton, the scriptures, and the hermeneutics of accommodation’, in Nature and scripture in the Abrahamic religions, eds., van der Meer, J. M. and Mandelbrote, S. (2 vols, Leiden, 2008), i, 491–530.Google Scholar
Soll, J., Publishing the Prince: history, reading, and the birth of political criticism (Ann Arbor, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorell, T., ‘Hobbes and Aristotle’, in Philosophy in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries: conversations with Aristotle, eds., Blackwell, C. and Kusukawa, S. (Aldershot, 1999), 364–79.Google Scholar
Southgate, B. C., ‘Cauterising the tumour of Pyrrhonism: Blackloism vs skepticism’, JHI, 53 (1992), 631–45.Google Scholar
Southgate, B. C., ‘Covetous of truth’: the life and work of Thomas White, 1593–1676 (Dordrecht, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spellman, W. M., The latitudinarians and the Church of England, 1660–1700 (Athens [GA], 1993).Google Scholar
Spiller, M. R. G., ‘Concerning Natural Experimental Philosophie’: Meric Casaubon and the Royal Socieity (The Hague, 1980).Google Scholar
Spinks, B. D., ‘Outram, William’, ODNB.Google Scholar
Springborg, P., ‘Introduction’, in Hobbes, Thomas, Historia Ecclesiastica, eds. and trans. Springborg, P., Stablein, P., and Wilson, P. (Paris, 2008).Google Scholar
Springborg, P., ‘A very British Hobbes, or a more European Hobbes?’, BJHP, 22 (2014), 368–86.Google Scholar
Spurr, J., ‘“Latitudinarianism” and the Restoration Church’, HJ, 31 (1988), 61–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spurr, J., ‘Taylor, Jeremy’, ODNB.Google Scholar
von Staden, H., ‘Haeresis and heresy: the case of the haireseis iatrikai’, in Jewish and Christian self-definition, vol. iii: self-definition in the Greek and Roman world, eds., Meyer, B. F. and Sanders, E. P. (London, 1982), 76–100, 199–206.Google Scholar
von Staden, H., ‘Rupture and continuity: Hellenistic reflections on the history of medicine’, in Ancient histories of medicine: essays in medical doxography and historiography in classical antiquity, ed. van der Eijk, P. J. (Leiden, 1999), 143–88.Google Scholar
von Staden, H., ‘Celsus as historian’, in Ancient histories of medicine: essays in medical doxography and historiography in classical antiquity, ed. van der Eijk, P. J. (Leiden, 1999), 251–94.Google Scholar
Stanley Jones, F., ‘The genesis, purpose, and significance of John Toland’s Nazarenus’, in The rediscovery of Jewish Christianity: from Toland to Baur, ed. Stanley Jones, F. (Atlanta, 2012), 91–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanwood, P. G., ‘Stobaeus and classical borrowing in the Renaissance, with specialreference to Richard Hooker and Jeremy Taylor’, Neophilologus, 59 (1985), 141–6.Google Scholar
Stausberg, M., Faszination Zarathushtra: Zoroaster und die Europäische Religionsgeschichte der Frühen Neuzeit (2 vols, Berlin, 1998).Google Scholar
Stausberg, M., ‘Von den Chaldäischen Orakeln zu den Hundert Pforten und darüber hinaus: Das 17. Jahrhundert als rezeptionsgeschichtliche Epochenschwelle’, in Archiv für Religionsgeschichte, 3 (2001), 257–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stausberg, M., Die Religion Zarathushtras: Geschichte, Gegenwart, Rituale (3 vols, Stuttgart, 2002–4).Google Scholar
Steinmetz, D. C., and Kolb, R., eds., Die Patristik in der Bibelexegese des 16. Jahrhunderts (Wiesbaden, 1999).Google Scholar
Stephen, L., History of English thought in the eighteenth century (2 vols, London, 1881).Google Scholar
Steuert, D. H., ‘A study in Recusant prose: Dom Serenus Cressy, 1605–74’, The Downside Review, 66 (1948).Google Scholar
Stevenson, L. G., ‘“New diseases” in the seventeenth century’, Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 39 (1965), 1–21.Google Scholar
Stewart, I., ‘Mathematics as philosophy: Barrow and Proclus’, Dionysius, 18 (2000), 151–81.Google Scholar
Stewart, L., The rise of public science: rhetoric, technology, and natural philosophy in Newtonian Britain, 1660–1750 (Cambridge, 1992).Google Scholar
Stewart, L., ‘Harris, John’, ODNB.Google Scholar
Stewart, M. A., ‘Stillingfleet and the way of ideas’, English philosophy in the age of Locke, ed. Stewart, M. A. (Oxford, 2000), 245–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stinger, C. L., Humanism and the church fathers: Ambrogio Traversari (1386–1439) and Christian antiquity in the Italian Renaissance (New York, 1977).Google Scholar
Stolzenberg, D., ‘The Egyptian crucible of truth and superstition: Athanasius Kircher and the hieroglyphic doctrine’, in Antike Weisheit und kulturelle Praxis: Hermetismus in der Frühen Neuzeit, eds., Trepp, A.-C. and Lehmann, H. (Göttingen, 2001), 145–64.Google Scholar
Stolzenberg, D., Egyptian Oedipus: Athanasius Kircher and the secrets of antiquity (Chicago, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stroumsa, G. G., ‘Isaac de Beausobre revisited: the birth of Manichaean studies’, in Studia Manichaica. IV. Internationaler Kongreß zum Manichäismus, Berlin, 14.-18. Juli 1997, eds. Emmerick, R. E., Sundermann, W., and Zieme, P. (Berlin, 2000), 601–12.Google Scholar
Stroumsa, G. G., ‘John Spencer and the roots of idolatry’, History of Religions, 40 (2001), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stroumsa, G. G., ‘Thomas Hyde and the birth of Zoroastrian studies’, in Jerusalem Studies in Arabic and Islam, 26 (2002), 216–30.Google Scholar
Stroumsa, G. G., A new science: the discovery of religion in the age of reason (Cambridge [MA], 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stubbs, M., ‘John Beale, philosophical gardener of Herefordshire, part I. Prelude to the Royal Society (1608–1663)’, Annals of Science, 39 (1982), 463–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stubbs, M., ‘Part II: the improvement of agriculture and trade in the Royal Society (1663–1683)’, Annals of Science, 46 (1989), 323–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundermann, W., ‘How Zoroastrian is Mani’s dualism?’, in Manicheismo e oriente Christiano antico, eds., Cirillo, L. and van Tongerloo, A. (Louvain, 1997), 343–60.Google Scholar
Sykes, N., From Sheldon to Secker: aspects of English church history 1660–1768 (Cambridge, 1959).Google Scholar
Tambrun-Krasker, B., ed. and trans., Μαγικὰ λόγια τῶν ἀπὸ Ζωροάστρου μάγων … Ἐξήγησις εíς τὰ αὐτὰ λόγια: Oracles chaldaïques. Recension de Georges Gémiste Pléthon (Brussels, 1995).Google Scholar
Tambrun-Krasker, B., ‘Marsile Ficin et le “Commentaire” de Pléthon sur les “Oracles Chaldaïques”’, Academia, 1 (1999), 9–48.Google Scholar
Tavard, G. H., The seventeenth-century tradition: a study in Recusant thought (Leiden, 1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, E. G. R., ‘The English worldmakers of the seventeenth century and their influence on the earth sciences’, Geographical Review, 38 (1948), 104–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J. E., Jewish women philosophers of first-century Alexandria: Philo’s ‘Therapeutae’ reconsidered (Oxford, 2003).Google Scholar
Temkin, O., ‘Celsus’ “On medicine” and the ancient medical sects’, Bulletin of the Institute of the History of Medicine, 3 (1935), 249–64.Google Scholar
Temkin, O., ‘The classical roots of Glisson’s doctrine of irritation’, Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 38 (1964), 297–328.Google ScholarPubMed
Terrall, M., ‘Natural philosophy for fashionable readers’, in Books and the sciences in history, eds., Frasca-Spada, M. and Jardine, N. (Cambridge, 2000), 239–44.Google Scholar
Thiel, U., ‘The trinity and human personal identity’, in English philosophy in the age of Locke, ed. Stewart, M. A. (Oxford, 2000).Google Scholar
Thompson, M. P., ‘Reception theory and the interpretation of historical meaning’, History and Theory, 32 (1993), 248–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thouard, D., ‘Hamann and the history of philosophy’, in History of scholarship, eds., Ligota, C. and Quantin, J.-L. (Oxford, 2006), 413–36.Google Scholar
Tigerstedt, E. N., The decline and fall of the neoplatonic interpretation of Plato (Helsinki, 1974).Google Scholar
Timpanaro, S., The genesis of Lachmann’s method, trans. Most, G. (Chicago, 2005 [Italian orig.=1963]).Google Scholar
Tolomio, I., ‘The “historica philosophica” in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries’, in Santinello i, 66–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toomer, G.J., Easterne wisedome and learning: the study of Arabic in seventeenth-century England (Oxford, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toomer, G.J., ‘Selden’s Historie of Tithes: genesis, publication, aftermath’, Huntington Library Quarterly, 65 (2002), 345–78.Google Scholar
Trevor-Roper, H., Catholics, Anglicans and puritans: seventeenth-century essays (London, 1987).Google Scholar
Trowell, S., ‘Unitarian and/or Anglican: the relationship of Unitarianism to the Church from 1687 to 1698’, Bulletin of the John Rylands University Library of Manchester, 78 (1996), 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuck, R., ‘The civil religion of Thomas Hobbes’, in Political discourse in early modern Britain, eds., Phillipson, N. and Skinner, Q. (Cambridge, 1993), 120–38.Google Scholar
Tuck, R., ‘The institutional setting’, in The Cambridge history of seventeenth-century philosophy, eds., Garber, D. and Ayers, M. (Cambridge, 1998), i, 9–32.Google Scholar
Tulloch, J., Rational theology and Christian philosophy in England in the seventeenth century (2 vols, London, 1874).Google Scholar
Turnbull, G. H., ‘John Hall’s letters to Samuel Hartlib’, Review of English Studies, 4 (1953), 221–33.Google Scholar
Turner, A. J., ‘Hooke’s theory of the Earth’s axial displacement: some contemporary opinion’, BJHS, 7 (1974), 166–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tutino, S., Thomas White and the Blackloists: between politics and theology during the English Civil War (Aldershot, 2008).Google Scholar
Tyacke, N., ‘Religious controversy’, in The history of the University of Oxford, vol. iv: seventeenth-century Oxford, ed. Tyacke, N. (Oxford, 1997), 569–619.Google Scholar
Universal Magazine, The, 94 (1794).Google Scholar
Vermeulen, C. L., ‘Strategies and slander in the Protestant part of the republic of letters: image, friendship and patronage in Etienne de Courcelles’ correspondence’, in Self-presentation and social identification: the rhetorics and pragmatics of letter writing in early modern times, eds., Van Houdt, T., Papy, J., Tournoy, G., and Matheeussen, C. (Leuven, 2002), 247–80.Google Scholar
Walker, D. P., ‘Orpheus the theologian and Renaissance Platonists’, JWCI, 16 (1953), 100–20.Google Scholar
Walker, D. P., ‘Origène en France’, in Courants religieux et humanisme à la fin du XVe et au début du XVIe siècle (Paris, 1969), 101–19.Google Scholar
Walker, D. P., Il concetto di spirit o anima in Henry More e Ralph Cudworth (Naples, 1986).Google Scholar
Wallace, D. D. jr., Shapers of English Calvinism, 1660–1714: variety, persistence, and transformation (Oxford, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, R., ‘Historical sketch of the trinitarian controversy from the accession of William III to the passing of the Blasphemy Act’, The Christian Reformer (1845), 133–40, 278–90.Google Scholar
Wallace, W., ‘The vibrating nerve impule in Newton, Willis, and Gassendi: first steps in a mechanical theory of communication’, Brain and Cognition, 51 (2003), 66–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, W. W., ‘Newton’s early writings: beginning of a new direction’, in Newton and the new direction in science, eds., Coyne, G. V., Heller, M., and Źyciński, J. (Vatican City, 1988), 23–44.Google Scholar
Wallis, P., ‘Harvey, Gideon’, ODNB.Google Scholar
Wallis, P., ‘Mapletoft, John’, ODNB.Google Scholar
Walmsley, J. C., ‘“Morbus”—Locke’s early essay on disease’, ESM, 5 (2000), 366–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walmsley, J. C., ‘Sydenham and the development of Locke’s natural philosophy’, BJHP, 16 (2008), 65–83.Google Scholar
Ward, C. E., ‘Religio Laici and father Simon’s History’, Modern Language Notes, 61 (1946).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, D. H. J., ‘Hobbes’s interpretation of the doctrine of the trinity’, Journal of Religious History, 5 (1969), 299–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wear, A., ‘William Harvey and the “way of the anatomists’”, History of Science, 21 (1983), 223–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, C., ‘Water as the ultimate principle of nature: the background to Boyle’s Sceptical Chymist’, Ambix, 13 (1965), 96–107.Google Scholar
Webster, C., ‘Harvey’s De generatione: its origins and relevance to the theory of circulation’, BJHS, 3 (1967), 263–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, C., ‘Henry Power’s experimental philosophy’, Ambix, 14 (1967), 150–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Webster, C., ‘English medical reformers of the Puritan Revolution: a background to the “Society of Chymical Physitians”’, Ambix, 14 (1967), 16–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, C., ‘Henry More and Descartes: some new sources’, BJHS, 4 (1969), 359–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, C., ‘The Helmontian George Thomson and William Harvey: the revival and applications of splenectomy to physiological research’, Medical History, 15 (1971), 154–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, C., From Paracelsus to Newton: magic and the making of modern science (New York, 1982).Google Scholar
Webster, C., The great instauration: science, medicine and reform, 1626–1660 (2nd edn, Oxford, 2002 [1st edn=1975]).Google Scholar
Weinberg, J., ‘The quest for the historical Philo in sixteenth-century Jewish historiography’, in Jewish history: essays in honour of Chumen Abramsky, eds., Rapoport-Albert, A. and Zipperstein, S. (London, 1988), 163–87.Google Scholar
Weinstein, D., Savonarola and Florence: prophecy and patriotism in the Renaissance (Princeton, 1970).Google Scholar
Westfall, R. S., Science and religion in seventeenth-century England (Michigan, 1973).Google Scholar
Westfall, R. S., ‘The role of alchemy in Newton’s career’, in Reason, experiment and mysticism in the Scientific Revolution, eds., Bonelli, M. L. Righini and Shea, W. R. (Michigan, 1975), 189–232.Google Scholar
Westman, R., Plutarch gegen Kolotes. Seine Schrift ‘Adversus Kolotem’ als philosophiegeschichtliche Quelle (Helsinki, 1955).Google Scholar
Whelan, R., ‘The wage of sin is orthodoxy: the Confessions of Saint Augustine in Bayle’s Dictionnaire’, JHP, 26 (1988) 195–206.Google Scholar
Whitaker, V. K., ‘Francesco Patrizi and Francis Bacon’, in Francis Bacon’s legacy of texts, ed. W. A. Sessions (New York, 1990), 89–104.Google Scholar
White, J. S., ‘William Harvey and the primacy of the blood’, Annals of Science, 43 (1986), 239–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiting, J., ‘Living bodies’, in Essays on Aristotle’s De anima, eds., Nussbaum, M. C. and Rorty, A. O. (Oxford, 1992).Google Scholar
Whitteridge, G., ‘Introduction’, in Harvey, W., Disputations touching the generation of animals, trans. Whitteridge, G (Oxford, 1981).Google Scholar
Wijngaards, A. N. M., De ‘Bibliothèque Choisie’ van Jean Le Clerc: een Amsterdams geleerdentijdschrift uit de jaren 1703 tot 1713 (Amsterdam, 1986).Google Scholar
von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U. History of classical scholarship, trans. Harris, A. (London, 1982 [German 1st edn=1921]).Google Scholar
Williams, A., The common expositor: an account of the commentaries on Genesis, 1527–1633 (Chapel Hill, 1948).Google Scholar
Williams, A. V., ‘Hyde, Thomas’, Encyclopaedia Iranica (London, 1982–), xii, fasc. 6, 590–2.Google Scholar
Willmoth, F., Sir Jonas Moore: practical mathematics and Restoration science (Woodbridge, 1993).Google Scholar
Wilson, E., and Vinson, E., ‘Thomas Stanley’s translations and borrowings from Spanish and Italian poems’, Revue de Littérature Comparée, 32 (1958), 548–56.Google Scholar
Wind, E., ‘The revival of Origen’, in Studies in art and literature for Belle da Costa Greene, ed. Miner, D. (London, 1954), 412–24.Google Scholar
Wirszubski, C., Pico della Mirandola’s encounter with Jewish mysticism (Cambridge [MA], 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, E., ‘L’Utilisation du texte du Lucrèce par Gassandi dans le Philosophiae Epicuri Syntagma (1649)’, in Présence de Lucrèce, ed. Poignault, R. (Tours, 1999), 327–43.Google Scholar
Wolffe, M., ‘Hughes, George’, ODNB.Google Scholar
Wolfson, H. A., ‘The problem of the souls of the spheres: from the Byzantine commentaries on Aristotle through the Arabs and St. Thomas to Kepler’, Dumbarton Oaks Papers, 16 (1962), 65–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, P. B., ‘Methodology and apologetics: Thomas Sprat’s “History of the Royal Society”’, BJHS, 13 (1980), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolf, D. R., The idea of history in early Stuart England: erudition, ideology, and the ‘light of truth’ from the accession of James I to the Civil War (Toronto, 1990).Google Scholar
Worden, B., God’s instruments: political conduct in the England of Oliver Cromwell (Oxford, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, J. P., ‘Locke, Willis, and the seventeenth-century Epicurean soul’, in Atoms, pneuma, and tranquility: Epicurean and Stoic themes in European thought, ed. Osler, M. J. (Cambridge, 1989), 239–58.Google Scholar
Wright, S., ‘Hickman, Henry’, ODNB.Google Scholar
Yolton, J. W., Thinking matter: materialism in eighteenth-century Britain (Minnesota, 1983).Google Scholar
Young, B., Religion and enlightenment in eighteenth-century England: theological debate from Locke to Burke (Oxford, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Zande, J. ‘August Ludwig Schlözer and the English Universal History’, in Historikerdialoge: Geschichte, Mythos und Gedächtnis Im Deutsch-britischen kulturellen Austausch 1750–2000, eds., Berger, S., Lambert, P., and Schumann, P. (Göttingen, 2003), 135–56.Google Scholar
Zook, M., ‘Ferguson, Robert’, ODNB.Google Scholar
Agostini, I., ‘Henry More and the sources of the doctrine of spiritual extension’, paper presented at the symposium on ‘The sources of Cambridge Platonism’, Clare College, Cambridge, 6 April 2013.Google Scholar
Bulman, W., ‘Constantine’s Enlightenment: culture and religious politics in the early British Empire, c. 1648-1710’ (unpublished PhD thesis, Princeton University, 2009).Google Scholar
Cerbu, T. J.-M., ‘Leone Allacci (1587–1669): the fortunes of an early Byzantinist’ (unpublished PhD thesis, Harvard University, 1986).Google Scholar
Day, S., ‘Nathaniel Culverwell’s Elegant and learned discourse on the light of nature (1652) in institutional and philosophical context’ (unpublished BA dissertation, University of Cambridge, 2009).Google Scholar
Deer, L. A., ‘Academic theories of generation in the Renaissance: the contemporaries and successors of Jean Fernel’ (unpublished PhD thesis, University of London, Warburg Institute, 1980).Google Scholar
Fishman, J. H., ‘Edward Stillingfleet, Bishop of Worcester (1635–99): Anglican bishop and controversialist’ (unpublished PhD thesis, University of Wisconsin, 1977).Google Scholar
Hardy, N. J. S., ‘The ars critica in early modern England’ (unpublished DPhil thesis, University of Oxford, 2012).Google Scholar
Keene, N., ‘Critici Sacri: biblical criticism in England c. 1650–1710’ (unpublished PhD thesis, University of London, 2004).Google Scholar
Lawrence, M. T., ‘Transmission and transformation: Thomas Goodwin and the puritan project’ (unpublished PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, 2002).Google Scholar
Lewis, M. A., ‘The educational influence of Cambridge Platonism: tutorial relationships and student networks at Christ’s College, Cambridge, 1641–1688’ (unpublished PhD thesis, University of London, 2010).Google Scholar
Malet, A., ‘Studies on James Gregorie (1638–1675)’ (unpublished PhD thesis, Princeton University, 1989).Google Scholar
Miller, E. C., ‘The doctrine of the Church in the thought of Herbert Thorndike (1598–1672)’ (unpublished DPhil thesis, University of Oxford, 1990).Google Scholar
Stephenson, H., ‘Thomas Firmin’ (unpublished DPhil thesis, University of Oxford, 1949).Google Scholar
Walmsley, J. C., ‘John Locke’s natural philosophy (1632–1671)’ (unpublished PhD thesis, King’s College, University of London, 1998).Google Scholar
Wilmott, M. J., ‘Francesco Patrizi da Cherso’s humanist critique of Aristotle’ (unpublished PhD thesis, University of London, The Warburg Institute, 1984).Google Scholar