Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Part I Major language trends in twentieth-century language teaching
- Part II Alternative approaches and methods
- Part III Current communicative approaches
- 14 Communicative Language Teaching
- 15 The Natural Approach
- 16 Cooperative Language Learning
- 17 Content-Based Instruction
- 18 Task-Based Language Teaching
- 19 The post-methods era
- Author index
- Subject index
14 - Communicative Language Teaching
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 July 2010
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Part I Major language trends in twentieth-century language teaching
- Part II Alternative approaches and methods
- Part III Current communicative approaches
- 14 Communicative Language Teaching
- 15 The Natural Approach
- 16 Cooperative Language Learning
- 17 Content-Based Instruction
- 18 Task-Based Language Teaching
- 19 The post-methods era
- Author index
- Subject index
Summary
Background
The origins of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) are to be found in the changes in the British language teaching tradition dating from the late 1960s. Until then, Situational Language Teaching (see Chapter 3) represented the major British approach to teaching English as a foreign language. In Situational Language Teaching, language was taught by practicing basic structures in meaningful situation-based activities. But just as the linguistic theory underlying Audiolingualism was rejected in the United States in the mid-1960s, British applied linguists began to call into question the theoretical assumptions underlying Situational Language Teaching:
By the end of the sixties it was clear that the situational approach … had run its course. There was no future in continuing to pursue the chimera of predicting language on the basis of situational events. What was required was a closer study of the language itself and a return to the traditional concept that utterances carried meaning in themselves and expressed the meanings and intentions of the speakers and writers who created them.
(Howatt 1984: 280)This was partly a response to the sorts of criticisms the prominent American linguist Noam Chomsky had leveled at structural linguistic theory in his now-classic book Syntactic Structures (1957). Chomsky had demonstrated that the current standard structural theories of language were incapable of accounting for the fundamental characteristic of language – the creativity and uniqueness of individual sentences. British applied linguists emphasized another fundamental dimension of language that was inadequately addressed in approaches to language teaching at that time – the functional and communicative potential of language. They saw the need to focus in language teaching on communicative proficiency rather than on mere mastery of structures.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching , pp. 153 - 177Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2001
- 7
- Cited by