Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g7rbq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T19:28:19.049Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Airships, airplanes, and launch vehicles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 November 2009

Martin A. Uman
Affiliation:
University of Florida
Get access

Summary

Overview

The metal skin of a modern airplane can be considered a good approximation both to a Faraday cage and to the outer surface of a topological shielded system (see Section 3.1). As such, the skin provides the primary lightning protection for the aircraft. Generally, when lightning strikes a metal airplane, the lightning current remains in the skin of the plane as it flows between entrance and exit points. If the shielding by the plane's skin were perfect, there would be no danger to the interior electronics or to the fuel in the wings of the airplane. Unfortunately, there are openings (apertures) such as windows in the metal skin and antennas that project through insulated areas in the skin, both of which may serve as entry points for lightning electromagnetic fields. Additionally, the plane's aluminum skin is not always thick enough to avoid direct damage by a severe lightning charge flowing into the skin (see Section 2.3). Lightning often disables interior aircraft electronics, as we shall discuss in Section 9.2, and occasionally lightning can burn through the aircraft's skin, igniting fuel or releasing hydraulic fluids, examples of which are given in Section 9.3. In Section 9.4, we will briefly consider the standards for testing aircraft to make more certain they can withstand a lightning strike without serious consequences.

Contrary to the common view, most lightning discharges that strike airplanes in flight are initiated by the planes themselves. The lightning would not have occurred if the plane had not been present.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Archbold, R. 1994. Hindenburg: An Illustrated History. New York: Warner Books.Google Scholar
Anderson, R. B. and Kroninger, H. 1975. Lightning phenomena in the aerospace environment. Part II: Lightning strikes to aircraft. Trans. S. Afr. Inst. Electr. Eng. 66: 166–175.Google Scholar
Bussey, J. 1987. Report of Atlas/Centaur-67/FLTSATCOM F-6 Investigation Board, Vol. II. NASA.
Christian, H. J., Mazur, V., Fisher, B. D.et al. 1989. The Atlas/Centaur lightning strike incident. J. Geophys. Res. 94: 13169–13177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, F. A., Plumer, J. A., and Perela, R. A. 1999. Lightning Protection of Aircraft, second printing. Pittsfield, MA: Lightning Technologies Inc.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, D. R. 1967. Probable aircraft “triggering” of lightning in certain thunderstorms. Mon. Weather Rev. 95: 835–842.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godfrey, R., Mathews, E. R. and McDivitt, J. A. 1970. Analysis of Apollo 12 Lightning Incident. NASA MSC-01540.
Harrison, H. T. 1965. United Air Line turbojet experience with electrical discharges. United Air Lines Meteorological Circular, No. 57.Google Scholar
Krider, E. P., Noggle, R. C., Uman, M. A. and Orville, R. E., 1974. Lightning and the Apollo/17 Saturn V exhaust plume. J. Spacecraft Rockets 11: 72–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lalande, P., Bondiou-Clergerie, A. and Laroche, P. 1999. Studying aircraft lightning strokes. Aerospace Engineering (publisher: SAE Aerospace): 39–42. See also Analysis of available in-flight measurements of lightning strikes to aircraft, Proc. 1999 Int. Conf. Lightning and Static Electricity, Toulouse, France, pp. 401–408.
Los Angeles Times, January 29, 1969. final edition, page 1.
Mazur, V. 1989. A physical model of lightning initiation on aircraft in thunderstorms. J. Geophys. Res. 94: 3326–3340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazur, V., Fisher, B. D. and Gerlach, J. C. 1984. Lightning strikes to an airplane in a thunderstorm. J. Aircraft 21: 607–611.Google Scholar
Mazur, V., Fisher, B. D. and Gerlach, J. C. 1986. Lightning strikes to a NASA airplane penetrating thunderstorms at low altitudes. J. Aircraft 23: 499–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMurtry, T. C. 1987. NASA 914 T-38A Jet Trainer Lightning Strike Investigation Report. Date of Mishap Feb. 24, 1987. NASA Johnson Space Center document, July 6, 1987.
Moreau, J.-P., Alliot, J.-C., and Mazur, V. 1992. Aircraft lightning initiation and interception from in situ electric measurements and fast video observations. J. Geophys. Res. 97: 15903–15912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murooka, Y. 1992. A survey of lightning interaction with aircraft in Japan. Res. Lett. Atmos. Electr. 12: 101–106.Google Scholar
Petterson, B. J. and Wood, W. R. 1968. Measurements of Lightning Strokes to Aircraft. Sandia Laboratory Report SC-M-67–549. Albuquerque, NM: Sandia Laboratories. (also Report DS-68-1 of the Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
Pitts, F. L., Perala, R. A., Rudolph, T. H., and Lee, L. D. 1987. New results for quantification of lightning/aircraft electrodynamics. Electromagnetics 7: 451–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitts, F. L., Fisher, B. D., Vladislav, V. and Perala, R. A. 1988. Aircraft jolts from lightning bolts. IEEE Spectrum 25 (July): 34–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rakov, V. A. and Uman, M. A. 2003. Lightning, Physics and Effects. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reazer, J. S., Serrano, A. V., Walko, L. C. and Burket, Capt H. D. 1987. Analysis of correlated electromagnetic fields and current pulses during airborne lightning attachments. Electromagnetics 7: 509–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, D. H. 1971. The Zeppelin in Combat, 3rd edn. J. W. Caler Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Rustan, P. L. 1986. The lightning threat to aerospace vehicles. AIAA J. Aircraft 23: 62–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uman, M. A. and Rakov, V. A. 2003. The interaction of lightning with airborne vehicles. Prog. Aerospace Sci. 39: 62–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orman, W. T., and as told to Hull, R. 1978. The Wizard of the Winds. Saint Cloud, MN: North Star Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×