Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T09:22:39.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - It came from outer space

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2015

Michael K. Shepard
Affiliation:
Bloomsburg University, Pennsylvania
Get access

Summary

When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.

Arthur Conan Doyle, Sign of Four

THE ICE FIELD, ANTARCTICA

Every December and January, about a dozen volunteers spend their holiday season camping on the blue ice of Antarctica. It is summer there then, and with temperatures approaching 0 °C during the day (32 °F), they enjoy the best weather the continent has to offer. Although most of these volunteers are scientists or graduate students, there is the occasional teacher or other non-scientist. But they all have one thing in common – they have come to hunt meteorites.

In December 1969, only six months after humans first stepped on the Moon, Japanese scientists stumbled across an unexpected find – nine meteorites, five of which were completely different from each other, and all found in a very small area of the Antarctic ice. Over the next few years, they increased their bounty with each outing, collecting dozens and then hundreds of new meteorites in each short field season.

The Japanese reported these findings at a 1971 meeting of the Meteoritical Society – the meteorite scientist's analog to the National Geographic or Royal Societies. In the audience was William “Bill” Cassidy, a meteoriticist from the University of Pittsburgh. After their talk, he realized what perhaps nobody else had – there would be thousands, if not hundreds of thousands more. Even better, there were unique conditions that concentrated the meteorites in small areas.

Now Antarctica gets no more meteorites than any other part of the Earth – and perhaps fewer given its polar geography – but meteorites are easier to see here than most other places because they stick out against the white and blue background. And in a place where most of the native rocks are buried hundreds of meters below the surface ice, any rock on the surface is an anomaly unless you're right up on a shedding mountain.

Antarctica is covered by up to three kilometers (two miles) of ice, an enormous continental glacier.

Type
Chapter
Information
Asteroids
Relics of Ancient Time
, pp. 67 - 96
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ANSMET, The Antarctic Search for Meteorites: http://artscilabs.case.edu/ansmet/ Antarctic Meteorites Curation: http://curator.jsc.nasa.gov/antmet/index.cfm Peter Brown's homepage with DOE and DOD satellite information on fireballs: http://meteor.uwo.ca/research/fireball/dod.html
NASA scientists say DNA can be made in space: http://www.nasa.gov/topics/solarsystem/features/dna-meteorites.html
Smell from Murchison. John Lovering: http://museumvictoria.com.au/melbournemuseum/discoverycentre/dynamic-earth/videos/the-murchison-meteoritestory/ 2014 AA discovery and infrasound tracking: http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/news/ news182a.html
CTBTO - Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty Organization: http://www.youtube. com/watch?v=GVWOA5pZG6o
http://www.ctbto.org/verification-regime/monitoring-technologies-how-theywork/infrasound-monitoring/
P. G., Brown. Fireballs producing meteorites: From Chelyabinsk to Tagish Lake. 76th Annual Meteoritical Society Meeting (2013) 5263.pdf.
W. A., Cassidy.Meteorites, Ice, and Antarctica: A Personal Account (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
E. F. F., Chladni. Observations on a mass of iron found in Siberia by Professor Pallas, and on other masses of the like kind, with some conjectures respecting their connection with certain natural phenomena. Phil. Mag., London, 2 (1798) 1–8.Google Scholar
E. C., Howard.Experiments and observations on certain stony substances, which at different times are said to have fallen on the Earth;also on various kinds of native iron.Phil. Trans., 92 (1802) 168–212.Google Scholar
E. L., Krinov.The Tunguska and Sikhote-Alin meteorites. In The SolarSystem, Vol. IV: The Moon, Meteorites, and Comets, eds. B. M., Middlehurst, G. P., Kuiper (Chicago, USA: University of Chicago Press, 1963), pp. 208–234.Google Scholar
U. B., Marvin.Ernst Florens Friedrich Chladni (1756–1827) and the origins of modern meteorite research. Meteor. Planet. Sci., 31 (1996) 545–588.Google Scholar
U. B., Marvin.Meteorites in history: An overview from the Renaissance to the 20th century. In The History of Meteorites and Key Meteorite Collections: Fireballs, Falls, and Finds, eds. G. J. H., McCall, A. J., Bowden, R. J., Howarth. Geological Society Special Publication No. 256 (London: The Geological Society, 2006), pp. 15–72.Google Scholar
R. H., Nuttall.The first microscope of Henry Clifton Sorby. Technology and Culture, 22 (1981) 275–280.Google Scholar
M., O'Leary. Anaxagoras and the Origin of Panspermia Theory (Bloomington, IN: iUniverse Publishing Group, 2008).Google Scholar
H. C., Sorby.On the structure and origin of meteorites. Nature, 15(1877) 495–498.Google Scholar
W., Thomson. Inaugural Address of Sir William Thomson, LL.D. FRS, President, The British Association Meeting at Edinburgh. Nature, 4(1871) 261–278.Google Scholar
S. J., Arrowsmith, D. O., ReVelle, W., Edwards, P., Brown. Global detection of infrasonic signals from three large bolides. Earth, Moon, Planets, 102(2008) 357–363.Google Scholar
P. G., Brown, R. W., Whitaker, D. O., Revelle, E., Tagliaferri. Multi-station infrasonic observations of two large bolides: Signal interpretations and implications for monitoring of atmospheric explosions. Geophys. Res. Lett., 29 (2002) 1636–1640.Google Scholar
M. P., Callahan et al. Carbonaceous meteorites contain a wide range of extraterres–trial nucleobases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 108 (34) (2011) 13995–13998, doi:10.1073.Google Scholar
C., Koeberl. Craters on the Moon from Galileo to Wegener: A short history of the impact hypothesis and implications for the study of terrestrial impact craters. Earth, Moon, Planets, 85–86 (2001) 209–224.Google Scholar
J., Geiss, G., Gloeckler. Abundances of deuterium and helium in the protosolar cloud. Space Sci. Rev., 84 (1998) 239–250.Google Scholar
H., Genda, M., Ikoma. Origin of the ocean on Earth: Early evolution of water D/H in a hydrogen-rich atmosphere. Icarus, 194(2008) 42–52.Google Scholar
J., Oberst et al. The “European Fireball Network”: Current status and future prospects. Meteor. Planet. Sci., 33 (1998) 49–56.Google Scholar
S., Pizzarello, J. R., Cronin.Non-racemic amino acids in the Murry and Murchison meteorites. Geochem. Cosmochem. Acta, 64(2000) 329–338.Google Scholar
D. O., ReVelle, Acoustics of meteors, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan (1974).Google Scholar
D. O., ReVelle.On meteor-generated infrasound. J. Geophys. Res., 81 (1972) 1217–1230.Google Scholar
F., Robert. Solar system deuterium/hydrogen ratio. In Meteorites and the Early Solar System II, eds. D. S., Lauretta, H. Y., McSween (Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press, 2006), pp. 341–351.Google Scholar
D. W. G., Sears. The Origin of Chondrules and Chondrites (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
P., Spurny, J., Oberst, D., Heinlein. Photographic observations of Neuschwanstein, a second meteorite fromthe orbit of the Pribram chondrite. Nature, 423(2003) 151–153.Google Scholar
E., Tagliaferri, R., Spalding, C., Jacobs, S. P., Worden, A., Erlich. Detection of meteoroid impacts by optical sensors in Earth orbit. In Hazards Due to Comets and Asteroids, ed. T., Gehrels (Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press, 1994) pp. 199–220.Google Scholar
Howard quote: E. C., Howard.Experiments and observations on certain stony substances, which at different times are said to have fallen on the Earth; also on various kinds of native iron. Phil. Trans., 92 (1802) p. 212.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×