Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T12:45:46.834Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - The gambler's fallacy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2015

Michael K. Shepard
Affiliation:
Bloomsburg University, Pennsylvania
Get access

Summary

The dice of God are always loaded.

Ralph Waldo Emerson, Compensation

THE AWAKENING

For two centuries, asteroids were discovered randomly by astronomers attempting to do other “real” work in astronomy. With the exception of the first decades after the discovery of Ceres, there does not appear to have been any systematic effort to discover more. Eros, the 433rd numbered asteroid, was not discovered until nearly a century after Ceres. And by the 1980s, well into the modern astronomical era, only a couple of thousand asteroids had been discovered; of those, only a handful were in reservoirs other than the main belt. Since then, though, discoveries have accelerated; at present there are more than 400,000 numbered asteroids. Why the sudden quickening? It is because we are searching scared, using dedicated telescopes, high-tech instruments, and increasingly sophisticated software to extract these tiny needles from the cosmic haystack.

Culturally, there has been a shift. Until recently, there was no urgency for this search task. But several events have frightened us and made the effort worthwhile to those who control purse strings. Perhaps the watershed event was the discovery and subsequent impact of Comet Shoemaker–Levy 9 into Jupiter in 1994. A few scientists, including Gene Shoemaker (1928–1997), had been warning us of the threat of an impact for years. Shoemaker's role in proving that Meteor Crater, Arizona, was from a relatively recent impact had convinced him and others. But still, events of 50,000 years ago – the estimated age of that impact – don't register with most of us. Our temporal horizons are much closer.

Shoemaker, his wife Carolyn, and friend David Levy had worked together for years surveying the sky for asteroids that could approach and potentially hit the Earth. In March 1993, the trio discovered their ninth periodic comet together, and following the naming convention, it was designated Shoemaker–Levy 9 (SL9).

Type
Chapter
Information
Asteroids
Relics of Ancient Time
, pp. 131 - 158
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barringer Crater website: http://www.barringercrater.com/
Chelyabinsk lake fragment 570 kg: http://voiceofrussia.com/news/2013_10_16/Chelyabinsk-meteorite-fragment-weighing-almost-600-kg-lifted-from-LakeChebarkul-9995/
Also http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-24550941
Hurricane data: http://www.weatherexplained.com/Vol-1/Hurricanes.html (data from National Climatic Data Center/NOAA)
M., Peplow. Rock samples suggest meteor caused Tunguska blast. Nature News (2013), doi:10.1038/nature.2013.13163. http://www.nature.com/news/rocksamples-suggest-meteor-caused-tunguska-blast-1.13163
M. J., Benton.When Life Nearly Died: The Greatest Mass Extinction of All Time (London: Thames and Hudson, 2005).Google Scholar
V., Bricker. Dictionary of Maya language: As Spoken in Hocaba Yucatan (Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah Press, 1998).Google Scholar
B. B., Mandelbrot.The Fractal Geometry of Nature (New York: W. H. Freeman and Co., 1982).Google Scholar
C., Officer, J., Page. Tales of the Earth: Paroxysms and Perturbations of the Blue Planet (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
N. V., Vasiliev, A. F., Kovalevsky, S. A., Razin, L. E., Epiktetova. Eyewitness accounts of the Tunguska Fall (1981). Tunguska phenomenon Research Monographs. Ministry of Higher and Secondary Special Education of the RSFSR of Tomsk State University (in Russian). http://tunguska.tsc.ru/ru/science/1/0.
B., Barringer. Daniel Moreau Barringer (1860–1929) and his crater (the beginning of the crater branch of meteoritics). Meteoritics, 2(1964) 183–199.Google Scholar
G. K., Gilbert.The Moon's Face: A Study ofthe Origin of Its Features (Washington, DC: Philosophical Society of Washington, 1893).Google Scholar
G. K., Gilbert.The origin of hypotheses, illustrated by the discussion of a topo-graphic problem. Science, 3(1896) 1–13.Google Scholar
G. J. H., McCall. Meteorite cratering: Hooke, Gilbert, Barringer, and beyond. In The History of Meteorites and Key Meteorite Collections: Fireballs, Falls, and Finds, eds. G. J. H., McCall, A. J., Bowden, R. J., Howarth. Geological Society Special Publication No. 256 (London: The Geological Society, 2006), pp. 443–470.Google Scholar
B. C., Tilghman.Coon Butte, Arizona. Proc. Acad. Natural Sci. Philadelphia, 57(1905) 887–914.
L. W., Alvarez, W., Alvarez, F., Asaro, H. V., Michel.Extraterrestrial cause for the Cretaceous–Tertiary extinction. Science, 208(1980) 1094–1108.Google Scholar
J. D., Archibald et al. Cretaceous extinctions: Multiple causes. Science, 328(2010) 973.Google Scholar
M., Boslough. The Chelyabinsk airburst event. AAS DPS #45, abstract 110.01 (2013).
M. B. E., Boslough, D. A., Crawford.Low-altitude airbursts and the impact threat. Intern. J. Impact Eng., 35 (2008) 1441–1448.Google Scholar
P. G., Brown et al. A 500-kiloton airburst over Chelyabinsk and an enhanced hazard from small impactors. Nature, 503(2013) 238–241.Google Scholar
S. L., Brusatte et al. The extinction of the dinosaurs. Biol. Rev. (2014), doi:10.1111/ brv.12128.
E. C. T., Chao, E. M., Shoemaker, B. M., Madsen.First natural occurrence of coesite. Science, 132(1960) 220–222.Google Scholar
D. H., Clark, W. H., McCrea, F. R., Stephenson.Frequency of nearby supernovae and climactic and biological catastrophes. Nature, 265(1977) 318–319.Google Scholar
V., Courtillot, F., Fluteau. Cretaceous extinctions: The volcanic hypothesis. Science, 328(2010) 973–974.Google Scholar
A. R., Hildebrand et al. Chicxulub Crater: A possible Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary impact crater on the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. Geology, 19(1991) 867–871.Google Scholar
G., Keller et al. Chicxulub impact predates K-T boundary: New evidence from Brazos, Texas. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 255(2007) 339–356.Google Scholar
G., Keller et al. Cretaceous extinctions: Evidence overlooked. Science, 328(2010) 974–975.Google Scholar
T., Kohout et al. Mineralogy, reflectance spectra, and physical properties of the Chelyabinsk LL5 chondrite: Insight into shock-induced changes in asteroid regoliths. Icarus, 228(2014) 78–85.Google Scholar
V., Kvasnytsya et al. New evidence of meteoritic origin of the Tunguska cosmic body. Planet. Space Sci., 84 (2013) 131–140.Google Scholar
P., Schulte et al. The Chicxulub asteroid impact and mass extinction at the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary. Science, 327(2010) 1214–1218.Google Scholar
P., Schulte et al. Response to letters by Archibald et al., Keller et al., and Courtillot and Flueteau. Science, 328(2010) 975–976.Google Scholar
E. M., Shoemaker, E. C. T, Chao. New evidence for the impact origin of the Ries Basin, Bavaria, Germany. J. Geophys. Res., 66 (1961) 3371–3378.Google Scholar
E. M., Shoemaker.Impact mechanics at Meteor Crater, Arizona. In The Solar System, Vol. IV: The Moon, Meteorites, and Comets, eds. B. M., Middlehurst, G. P., Kuiper (Chicago, USA: University of Chicago Press, 1963), pp. 301–336.Google Scholar
D., Stoffler, N. A., Artemieva, E., Pierazzo.Modeling the Ries-Steinheim impact event and the formation of the moldavite strewn field. Meteor. Planet. Sci., 37 (2010) 1893–1907.Google Scholar
Shoemaker quote: E. M., Shoemaker (1963), p. 315.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×