Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T01:17:10.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Solving Foraging Problems: Top-Down and Bottom-Up Perspectives on the Role of Cognition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 June 2017

By
Andrea S. Griffin  and
David Guez
Edited by
Carel ten Cate  and
Susan D. Healy
Carel ten Cate
Affiliation:
Universiteit Leiden
Susan D. Healy
Affiliation:
University of St Andrews, Scotland
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Avian Cognition , pp. 119 - 140
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Auersperg, A. M. I., Gajdon, G. K. and von Bayern, A. M. P. (2012). A new approach to comparing problem solving, flexibility and innovation. Communicative & Integrative Biology, 5, 140–145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Auersperg, A. M. I., Kacelnik, A. and von Bayern, A. M. P. (2013). Explorative learning and functional inferences on a five-step means-means-end problem in Goffin's Cockatoos (Cacatua goffini). PLoS ONE, 8, 1–9.Google Scholar
Auersperg, A. M. I., von Bayern, A. M. P., Gajdon, G. K., et al. (2011). Flexibility in problem solving and tool use of kea and New Caledonian crows in a multi access box paradigm. PloS One, 6, e20231.Google Scholar
Beckers, T., Miller, R. R., De Houwer, J., et al. (2006). Reasoning rats: forward blocking in Pavlovian animal conditioning is sensitive to constraints of causal inference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 92–102.Google Scholar
Benson-Amram, S. and Holekamp, K. E. (2012). Innovative problem solving by wild spotted hyenas. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 279, 4087–4095.Google Scholar
Benson-Amram, S., Weldele, M. L. and Holekamp, K. E. (2013). A comparison of innovative problem-solving abilities between wild and captive spotted hyaenas, Crocuta crocuta. Animal Behaviour, 85, 349–356.Google Scholar
Blaisdell, A. P., Sawa, K., Leising, K. J., et al. (2006). Causal reasoning in rats. Science, 311, 1020–1022. DOI:10.1126/science.1121872Google Scholar
Bókony, V., Lendvai, A. Z., Vágási, C. I., et al. (2014). Necessity or capacity? Physiological state predicts problem-solving performance in house sparrows. Behavioral Ecology, 25, 124–135.Google Scholar
Boogert, N. J., Reader, S. M., Hoppitt, W., et al. (2008). The origin and spread of innovations in starlings. Animal Behaviour, 75, 1509–1518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouchard, J., Goodyer, W. and Lefebvre, L. (2007). Social learning and innovation are positively correlated in pigeons (Columba livia). Animal Cognition, 10, 259–266.Google Scholar
Carter, A. J., Marshall, H. H., Heinsohn, R., et al. (2014). Personality predicts the propensity for social learning in a wild primate. PeerJ, 2, e283. DOI:10.7717/peerj.283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cauchard, L., Boogert, N. J., Lefebvre, L., et al. (2013). Problem-solving performance is correlated with reproductive success in a wild bird population. Animal Behaviour, 85, 19–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chappell, J. and Kacelnik, A. (2002). Tool selectivity in a non-primate, the New Caledonian crow (Corvus moneduloides). Animal Cognition, 5(2), 71–78.Google Scholar
Chappell, J. and Kacelnik, A. (2004). Selection of tool diameter by New Caledonian crows Corvus moneduloides. Animal Cognition, 7, 121–127.Google Scholar
Christidis, L. and Boles, W. (2008). Systematics and taxonomy of Australian birds. Collingwood: CSIRO Publishing.Google Scholar
Clayton, N. S. (2004). Is necessity the mother of innovation? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 98–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T. H. and Harvey, P. H. (1980). Species differences in feeding and ranging behaviour in primates. Journal of Zoology, 190, 309–323.Google Scholar
Cole, E. F., Cram, D. L. and Quinn, J. L. (2011). Individual variation in spontaneous problem-solving performance among wild great tits. Animal Behaviour, 81, 491–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, E. F., Morand-Ferron, J., Hinks, A. E., et al. (2012). Cognitive ability influences reproductive life history variation in the wild. Current Biology, 22, 1808–1812.Google Scholar
Cole, E. F. and Quinn, J. L. (2012). Personality and problem-solving performance explain competitive ability in the wild. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 279, 1168–1175.Google Scholar
Coppens, C. M., de Boer, S. F. and Koolhaas, J. M. (2010). Coping styles and behavioural flexibility: towards underlying mechanisms. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 365, 4021–4028.Google Scholar
Deaner, R. O., Nunn, C. L. and van Schaik, C. P. (2000). Comparative tests of primate cognition: different scaling methods produce different results. Brain, Behavior and Evolution, 55, 44–52.Google Scholar
Diquelou, M., Griffin, A. S. and Sol, D. (2016). The role of motor diversity in foraging innovations: a cross-species comparison in urban birds. Behavioral Ecology, 27, 584–591. DOI:10.1093/beheco/arv190Google Scholar
Ducatez, S., Audet, J. N. and Lefebvre, L. (2014a). Problem-solving and learning in carib grackles: individuals show a consistent speed–accuracy trade-off. Animal Cognition, 18, 485–496.Google Scholar
Ducatez, S., Clavel, J. and Lefebvre, L. (2014b). Ecological generalism and behavioural innovation in birds: technical intelligence or the simple incorporation of new foods? Journal of Animal Ecology, 84, 79–89.Google Scholar
Dwyer, D. M., Starns, J. and Honey, R. C. (2009). “Causal reasoning” in rats: a reappraisal. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 35, 578–586. DOI:10.1037/a0015007Google ScholarPubMed
Gopnik, A. and Schulz, L. (2004). Mechanisms of theory formation in young children. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 371–377.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenberg, R. S. (2003). The role of neophobia and neophilia in the development of innovative behaviour of birds. In Animal Innovation, eds. Reader, S. M. and Laland, K. N. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 175–196.Google Scholar
Griffin, A. S. and Diquelou, M. (2015). Innovative problem solving in birds: A cross-species comparison of two highly successful Passerines. Animal Behaviour, 100, 84–94.Google Scholar
Griffin, A. S., Diquelou, M. and Perea, M. (2014). Innovative problem solving in birds: a key role of motor diversity. Animal Behaviour, 92, 221–227.Google Scholar
Griffin, A. S. and Guez, D. (2014). Innovation and problem solving: A review of common mechanisms. Behavioural Processes, 109, 121–134.Google Scholar
Griffin, A. S. and Guez, D. (2016). Bridging the gap between cross-taxon and within-species analyses of behavioural innovations in birds: Making sense of discrepant cognition-innovation relationships and the role of motor diversity. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 48, 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, A. S., Guez, D., Federspiel, I., et al. (2016). Invading new environments: A mechanistic framework linking motor diversity and cognitive processes to invasion success. In Biological Invasions and Behavior, eds. Sol, D and Weis, J. S. Pp. 26–46. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Griffin, A. S., Guez, D., Lermite, F., et al. (2013a). Tracking changing environments: Innovators are fast, but not flexible learners. PLoS ONE, 8, e84907.Google Scholar
Griffin, A. S., Lermite, F., Perea, M., et al. (2013b). To innovate or not: contrasting effects of social groupings on safe and risky foraging in Indian mynahs. Animal Behaviour, 86, 1291–1300.Google Scholar
Guez, D. and Griffin, A. S. (2016). Unraveling the key to innovative problem solving: a test of learning versus persistence. Behavioral Ecology, 27, 1449–1460.Google Scholar
Guez, D. and Stevenson, G. (2011). Is reasoning in rats really unreasonable? Revisiting recent associative accounts. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 277. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00277Google Scholar
Haselgrove, M. (2010). Reasoning rats or associative animals? A common-element analysis of the effects of additive and subadditive pretraining on blocking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 36, 296–306.Google Scholar
Healy, S. D. and Rowe, C. (2007). A critique of comparative studies of brain size. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 274, 453–464.Google Scholar
Heinrich, B. and Bugnyar, T. (2005). Testing problem solving in ravens: String-pulling to reach food. Ethology, 111, 962–976.Google Scholar
Hills, T. T. (2006). Animal foraging and the evolution of goal-directed cognition. Cognitive Science, 30, 3–41.Google Scholar
Huber, L. and Gajdon, G. K. (2006). Technical intelligence in animals: the kea model. Animal Cognition, 9, 295–305.Google Scholar
Hunt, G. R., Rutledge, R. B. and Gray, R. D. (2006). The right tool for the job: what strategies do wild New Caledonian crows use? Animal Cognition, 9, 307–316.Google Scholar
Isden, J., Panayi, C., Dingle, C., et al. (2013). Performance in cognitive and problem-solving tasks in male spotted bowerbirds does not correlate with mating success. Animal Behaviour, 86, 829–838.Google Scholar
Kamil, A. C. (1988). A synthetic approach to the study of animal intelligence. In Nebraska Symposium of Motivation 1987, Volume 35: Comparative Perspectives in Modern Psychology, eds. Diestbier, R. A. and Leger, D. W. Lincoln, NB: University of Nebraska Press, pp. 257–308.Google Scholar
Keagy, J., Savard, J.-F. and Borgia, G. (2011a). Cognitive ability and the evolution of multiple behavioral display traits. Behavioral Ecology, 23, 448–456.Google Scholar
Keagy, J., Savard, J.-F. and Borgia, G. (2011b). Complex relationship between multiple measures of cognitive ability and male mating success in satin bowerbirds, Ptilonorhynchus violaceus. Animal Behaviour, 81, 1063–1070.Google Scholar
Klopfer, P. H. (1967). Behavioural stereotypy in birds. Wilson Bulletin, 79, 290–300.Google Scholar
Kolodny, O., Edelman, S. and Lotem, A. (2015). Evolved to adapt: A computational approach to animal innovation and creativity. Current Zoology, 61, 350–367.Google Scholar
Kummer, H. and Goodall, J. (1985). Conditions of innovative behaviour in primates. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 308, 203–214.Google Scholar
Kurvers, R. H. J. M., Prins, H. H. T., van Wieren, S. E., et al. (2010a). The effect of personality on social foraging: shy barnacle geese scrounge more. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 277, 601–608.Google Scholar
Kurvers, R. H. J. M., van Oers, K., Nolet, B. A., et al. (2010b). Personality predicts the use of social information. Ecology Letters, 13, 829–837. DOI:10.1111/j.1461–0248.2010.01473.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, L. (2011). Taxonomic counts of cognition in the wild. Biology Letters, 7, 631–633.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, L. (2013). Brains, innovations, tools and cultural transmission in birds, non-human primates, and fossil hominins. Frontiers In Human Neuroscience, 7, 245.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, L., Gaxiola, A., Dawson, S., et al. (1998). Feeding innovations and forebrain size in Australasian birds. Behaviour, 135, 1077–1097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, L., Juretic, N., Nicolakakis, N., et al. (2001). Is the link between forebrain size and feeding innovations caused by confounding variables? A study of Australian and North American birds. Animal Cognition, 4, 91–97.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, L., Nicolakakis, N. and Boire, D. (2002). Tools and brains in birds. Behaviour, 139, 939–973.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, L., Reader, S. M. and Sol, D. (2004). Brains, innovations and evolution in birds and primates. Brain, Behavior and Evolution, 63, 233–246.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, L., Reader, S. M. and Sol, D. (2013). Innovating innovation rate and its relationship with brains, ecology and general intelligence. Brain, Behavior and Evolution, 81, 143–145.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, L. and Sol, D. (2008). Brains, lifestyles and cognition: are there general trends? Brain, Behavior and Evolution, 72, 135–144.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, L., Whittle, P. and Lascaris, E. (1997). Feeding innovations and forebrain size in birds. Animal Behaviour, 53, 549–560.Google Scholar
Liker, A. and Bókony, V. (2009). Larger groups are more successful in innovative problem solving in house sparrows. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 106, 7893–7898.Google Scholar
Macarthur, R. and Levins, R. (1967). The limiting similarity, convergence, and divergence of coexisting species. The American Naturalist, 101, 377–385.Google Scholar
Maes, E., De Filippo, G., Inkster, A. B., et al. (2015). Feature- versus rule-based generalization in rats, pigeons and humans. Animal Cognition, 18, 1267–1284.Google Scholar
Mangalam, M. and Singh, M. (2013). Flexibility in food extraction techniques in urban free-ranging bonnet macaques, Macaca radiata. PloS One, 8, e85497.Google Scholar
Manrique, H. M., Völter, C. J. and Call, J. (2013). Repeated innovation in great apes. Animal Behaviour, 85, 195–202.Google Scholar
Marino, L. (2006). Absolute brain size: did we throw the baby out with the bathwater? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 103, 13563–13564.Google Scholar
Martin, L. B. and Fitzgerald, L. (2005). A taste for novelty in invading house sparrows, Passer domesticus. Behavioral Ecology, 16, 702–707.Google Scholar
Milton, K. (1988). Foraging behaviour and the evolution of primate intelligence. In Machiavellian Intelligence: Social expertise and the evolution of intellect in monkeys, apes and humans, eds. Byrne, R. W. and Whiten, A. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 285–409.Google Scholar
Moldenke, A. R. (1975). Niche specialization and species diversity along a California transect. Oecologia, 21, 219–242.Google Scholar
Morand-Ferron, J., Cole, E. F., Rawles, J. E. C., et al. (2011). Who are the innovators? A field experiment with 2 passerine species. Behavioral Ecology, 22, 1241–1248.Google Scholar
Nicolakakis, N. and Lefebvre, L. (2000). Forebrain size and innovation rate in European birds: feeding, nesting and confounding variables. Behaviour, 137, 1415–1429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obozova, T. A., Bagotskaya, M. S., Smirnova, A. A., et al. (2014). A comparative assessment of birds’ ability to solve string-pulling tasks. Biology Bulletin, 41, 565–574.Google Scholar
Overington, S. E., Cauchard, L., Côté, K.-A., et al. (2011). Innovative foraging behaviour in birds: what characterizes an innovator? Behavioural Processes, 87, 274–285.Google Scholar
Overington, S. E., Morand-Ferron, J., Boogert, N. J., et al. (2009). Technical innovations drive the relationship between innovativeness and residual brain size in birds. Animal Behaviour, 78, 1001–1010.Google Scholar
Penn, D. C. and Povinelli, D. J. (2007). Causal cognition in human and nonhuman animals: a comparative, critical review. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 97–118.Google Scholar
Premack, D. (2007). Human and animal cognition: continuity and discontinuity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 104, 13861–13867.Google Scholar
Reader, S. M., Hager, Y. and Laland, K. N. (2011). The evolution of primate general and cultural intelligence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 366, 1017–1027.Google Scholar
Reader, S. M. and Laland, K. N. (2000). Diffusion of foraging innovations in the guppy. Animal Behaviour, 60, 175–180.Google Scholar
Reader, S. M. and Laland, K. N. (2002). Social intelligence, innovation, and enhanced brain size in primates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 99, 4436–4441.Google Scholar
Reader, S. M. and Laland, K. N. (2003). Animal innovation: An introduction. In Animal Innovation, eds. Reader, S. M. and Laland, K. N. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–35.Google Scholar
Réale, D., Garant, D., Humphries, M. M., et al. (2010). Personality and the emergence of the pace-of-life syndrome concept at the population level. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 365, 4051–4063.Google Scholar
Rescorla, R. A. (2014). Pavlovian second-order conditioning. Studies in associative learning (Psychology Revivals). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Roth, G. and Dicke, U. (2005). Evolution of the brain and intelligence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 250–257.Google Scholar
Shannon, C. E. and Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: The University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Shettleworth, S. J. (2010). Cognition, Evolution, and Behavior, 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smaers, J. B. and Soligo, C. (2013). Brain reorganization, not relative brain size, primarily characterizes anthropoid brain evolution. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 280, 20130269.Google Scholar
Sol, D., Griffin, A. S. and Barthomeus, I. (2012). Consumer and motor innovation in the common myna: the role of motivation and emotional responses. Animal Behaviour, 83, 179–188.Google Scholar
Taylor, A. H., Elliffe, D., Hunt, G. R., et al. (2010a). Complex cognition and behavioural innovation in New Caledonian crows. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 277, 2637–2643.Google Scholar
Taylor, A. H., Medina, F. S., Holzhaider, J. C., et al. (2010b). An investigation into the cognition behind spontaneous string pulling in New Caledonian crows. PloS One, 5, e9345.Google Scholar
Taylor, A. H., Hunt, G. R., Medina, F. S., et al. (2009a). Do New Caledonian crows solve physical problems through causal reasoning? Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 276, 247–254.Google Scholar
Taylor, A. H., Roberts, R., Hunt, G., et al. (2009b). Causal reasoning in New Caledonian crows. Ruling out spatial analogies and sampling error. Communicative & Integrative Biology, 2, 311–312.Google Scholar
Tebbich, S., Griffin, A. S., Peschl, M., et al. (2016). From mechanisms to function: an integrated framework of animal innovation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 371, 20150195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thorndike, E.L. (1898) Animal intelligence: An experimental study of the associative processes in animals. Psychological Review Monograph Supplement. 2, 1–8.Google Scholar
Thornton, A. and Samson, J. (2012). Innovative problem solving in wild meerkats. Animal Behaviour, 83, 1459–1468.Google Scholar
Timmermans, S., Lefebvre, L., Boire, D., et al. (2000). Relative size of the hyperstriatum ventrale is the best predictor of feeding innovation rate in birds. Brain, Behavior and Evolution, 56, 196–203.Google Scholar
Tosh, C. R., Krause, J. and Ruxton, G. D. (2009). Theoretical predictions strongly support decision accuracy as a major driver of ecological specialization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 106, 5698–5702.Google Scholar
Webster, S. J. and Lefebvre, L. (2001). Problem solving and neophobia in a columbiform–passeriform assemblage in Barbados. Animal Behaviour, 62, 23–32.Google Scholar
Weir, A. A. S., Chappell, J. and Kacelnik, A. (2002). Shaping of hooks in New Caledonian crows. Science, 297, 981.Google Scholar
Werdenich, D. and Huber, L. (2006). A case of quick problem solving in birds: string pulling in keas, Nestor notabilis. Animal Behaviour, 71(4), 855–863.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×