Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g7rbq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T17:54:46.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

20 - Applying SFL for Understanding and Fostering Instructed Second Language Development

from Part III - SFL in Application

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2019

Geoff Thompson
Affiliation:
University of Liverpool
Wendy L. Bowcher
Affiliation:
Sun Yat-Sen University, China
Lise Fontaine
Affiliation:
Cardiff University
David Schönthal
Affiliation:
Cardiff University
Get access

Summary

The chapter explores the contributions of Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) to the phenomenon of instructed second language (L2) development. It proposes three perspectives for understanding development. First, development can be seen as learners’ growing capacity to ‘make more meaning’, a way of foregrounding the inter-individual social-semiotic nature of language, language use, and language learning. Second, it suggests probing the suitability of the constructs and analyses that a theory makes available for enabling researchers and educators to trace a developmental trajectory over longer time periods. Finally, a theory should provide a principled, explicit, and comprehensive approach to linking the social context of language use to formal features across the entire language system. The chapter argues that SFL can make substantive contributions in each area and supports that contention by positioning SFL in the larger SLA discussion on development, by presenting core constructs and processes in SFL, and by explicating how they have guided research and L2 educational practice with a developmental trajectory. It concludes with a projection of potential expansions, both within SFL and in mainstream SLA research, if fruitful dialogic exchange is pursued by theorists and researchers across the entire field.
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achugar, M. and Colombi, M. C.. 2008. Systemic Functional Linguistic Explorations into the Longitudinal Study of Advanced Capacities: The Case of Spanish Heritage Language Learners, in Ortega, L. and Byrnes, H., eds., The Longitudinal Study of Advanced L2 Capacities. New York: Routledge. 3657.Google Scholar
Atkinson, D., ed. 2011. Alternative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bednarek, M. 2015. Emotion Talk across Corpora. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bednarek, M. and Martin, J. R., eds. 2010. New Discourse on Language: Functional Perspectives on Multimodality, Identity, and Affiliation. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Bhatia, V. K. 2004. Worlds of Written Discourse: A Genre-based View. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Biber, D. and Gray, B.. 2016. Grammatical Complexity in Academic English: Linguistic Change and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bunch, G. and Willett, K.. 2013. Writing to Mean in Middle School: Understanding How Second Language Writers Negotiate Textually-rich Content-area Instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing 22: 141–78.Google Scholar
Byrnes, H., ed. 2006a. Advanced Language Learning: The Contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Byrnes, H. 2006b. What Kind of Resource is Language and Why Does It Matter for Advanced Language Learning? An Introduction. In Byrnes, H., ed., Advanced Language Learning: The Contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky. London: Continuum. 128.Google Scholar
Byrnes, H. 2009. Emergent L2 German Writing Ability in a Curricular Context: A Longitudinal Study of Grammatical Metaphor. Linguistics and Education 20: 5066.Google Scholar
Byrnes, H. 2011. Beyond Writing as Language Learning or Content Learning: Construing Foreign Language Writing as Meaning-making. In Manchón, R. M., ed., Learning-to-write and Writing-to-learn in an Additional Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 133–57.Google Scholar
Byrnes, H. 2012. Conceptualizing FL Writing Development in Collegiate Settings: A Genre-based Systemic Functional Linguistic Approach. In Manchón, R. M., ed., L2 Writing Development: Multiple Perspectives. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 190218.Google Scholar
Byrnes, H. 2014a. Linking Task and Writing for Language Development: Evidence from a Genre-based Curricular Approach. In Byrnes, H. and Manchón, R. M., eds., Task-based Language Learning: Insights from and for L2 Writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 235–61.Google Scholar
Byrnes, H. 2014b. Theorizing Language Development at the Intersection of ‘Task’ and L2 Writing: Reconsidering Complexity. In Byrnes, H. and Manchón, R. M., eds., Task-based Language Learning: Insights from and for L2 Writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 79103.Google Scholar
Byrnes, H. 2015. Linking ‘Task’ and Curricular Thinking: An Affirmation of the TBLT Educational Agenda. In Bygate, M., ed., Domains and Directions in the Development of TBLT: A Decade of Plenaries from the International Conference. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 193224.Google Scholar
Byrnes, H. 2017. Meeting the Challenge of Instructed Language Development: Reflections on Systemic-Functional Contributions. In Neumann, S., Wegener, R., Fest, J., Niemietz, P., and Hützen, N., eds., Challenging Boundaries in Linguistics: Systemic Functional Perspectives. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. 457–91.Google Scholar
Byrnes, H., Maxim, H. H., and Norris, J. M.. 2010. Realizing Advanced Foreign Language Writing Development in Collegiate Education: Curricular Design, Pedagogy, Assessment. Modern Language Journal 94(Supplement 1): ivvi, 1–235.Google Scholar
Caffarel, A. 2006. Learning Advanced French through SFL: Learning SFL in French. In Byrnes, H., ed., Advanced Language Learning: The Contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky. London: Continuum. 204–24.Google Scholar
Chaiklin, S. 2003. The Zone of Proximal Development in Vygotsky’s Analysis of Learning and Instruction. In Kozulin, A., Gindis, B., Ageyev, V. S., and Miller, S. M., eds., Vygotsky’s Educational Theory in Cultural Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 3964.Google Scholar
Christie, F. 2012. Language Education throughout the School Years: A Functional Perspective. Language Learning Monograph Series. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Christie, F. and Derewianka, B.. 2008. School Discourse: Learning to Write across the Years of Schooling. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Coffin, C. and Donohue, J.. 2012. Academic Literacies and Systemic Functional Linguistics: How Do They Relate? Journal of English for Academic Purposes 11: 6475.Google Scholar
Coffin, C. and Donohue, J.. 2014. A Language as Social Semiotic-based Approach to Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. Language Learning Monograph Series. Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar
Coffin, C., Donohue, J., and North, S.. 2009. Exploring English Grammar: From Formal to Functional. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cook, V. 2008. Multi-competence: Black Hole or Wormhole for Second Language Acquisition Research? In Han, Z., ed., Understanding Second Language Process. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 1626.Google Scholar
Douglas Fir Group. 2016. A Transdisciplinary Framework for SLA in a Multilingual World. Modern Language Journal 100: 1947.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C. and Larsen-Freeman, D., eds. 2009. Language as a Complex Adaptive System. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gentil, G. 2011. A Biliteracy Agenda for Genre Research. Journal of Second Language Writing 20: 623.Google Scholar
Godfroid, A. 2016. The Effects of Implicit Instruction on Implicit and Explicit Knowledge Development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 36: 177215.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 1978. Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 1993. Towards a Language-based Theory of Learning. Linguistics and Education 5: 93116.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 1996. On Grammar and Grammatics. In Hasan, R., Cloran, C., and Butt, D. G., eds., Functional Descriptions: Theory in Practice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 138.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 2002. Spoken and Written Modes of Meaning. In Webster, J. J., ed., The Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday, Volume 1: On Grammar. London: Continuum. 323–51.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 2004. On the Grammar of Scientific English. In Webster, J. J., ed., The Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday, Volume 5: The Language of Science. London: Continuum. 181–98.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 2007a. A Language Development Approach to Education (1994). In Webster, J. J., ed., The Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday, Volume 9: Language and Education. London: Continuum. 368–82.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 2007b. The Notion of ‘Context’ in Language Education (1991). In Webster, J. J., ed., The Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday, Volume 9: Language and Education. London: Continuum. 269–90.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 2008. Complementarities in Language. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. and Matthiessen, C. M. I. M.. 2006. Construing Experience through Meaning. A Language-based Approach to Cognition. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Harman, R. 2013. Literary Intertextuality in Genre-based Pedagogies. Building Lexical Cohesion in Fifth-grade L2 Writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 22: 125–40.Google Scholar
Hasan, R. 1995. On Social Conditions for Semiotic Mediation: The Genesis of Mind in Society. In Sadovnik, A. R., ed., Knowledge and Pedagogy: The Sociology of Basil Bernstein. Norwood: Ablex. 171–96.Google Scholar
Housen, A., Kuiken, F., and Vedder, I., eds. 2012. Dimensions of L2 Performance and Proficiency: Complexity, Accuracy and Fluency in SLA. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H., Ellis, R., and Eskildsen, S., eds. 2015. Orders and Sequences in the Acquisition of L2 Morphosyntax, 40 Years On. Language Learning 65.Google Scholar
Jackson, D. O. and Suethanapornkul, S.. 2013. The Cognition Hypothesis: A Synthesis and Meta-analysis of Research on Second Language Task Complexity. Language Learning 63: 330–67.Google Scholar
Kerfoot, C. and Simon-Vandenbergen, A.. 2015. Language in Epistemic Access: Mobilising Multilingualism and Literacy Development for More Equitable Education in South Africa. Language and Education 29: 177–85.Google Scholar
Kress, G. 2009. Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lafford, B. A. 2007. Second Language Acquisition Reconceptualized? The Impact of Firth and Wagner (1997). Modern Language Journal 91: 735–56.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J. P. 2005. Sociocultural and Second Language Learning Research: An Exegesis. In Hinkel, E., ed., The Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum. 335–53.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. 2009. Adjusting Expectations: The Study of Complexity, Accuracy, and Fluency in Second Language Acquisition. Applied Linguistics 30: 579–89.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. 2014. Another Step to Be Taken: Rethinking the End Point of the Interlanguage Continuum. In Han, Z. and Tarone, E., eds., Interlanguage: Forty Years Later. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 203–20.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. 2015. Saying What We Mean: Making a Case for ‘Language Acquisition’ to Become ‘Language Development’. Language Teaching 48: 491505.Google Scholar
Llinares, A., Morton, T., and Whittaker, R., eds. 2012. The Roles of Language in CLIL. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. 1991. Intrinsic Functionality: Implications for Contextual Theory. Social Semiotics 1: 99162.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. 1997. Analysing Genre: Functional Parameters. In Christie, F. and Martin, J. R., eds., Genre and Institutions: Social Processes in the Workplace and School. London: Continuum. 339.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. 2007. Construing Knowledge: A Functional Linguistic Perspective. In Christie, F. and Martin, J. R., eds., Language, Knowledge and Pedagogy: Functional Linguistic and Sociological Perspectives. 3464. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. 2009. Genre and Language Learning: A Social Semiotic Perspective. Linguistics and Education 20: 1021.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R., ed. 2013. Interviews with M. A. K. Halliday: Language Turned Back on Himself. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. 2007. The ‘Architecture’ of Language According to Systemic Functional Theory: Developments since the 1970s. In Hasan, R., Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., and Webster, J. J., eds., Continuing Discourse on Language: A Functional Perspective, Volume 2. Sheffield: Equinox. 505–61.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. 2009. Meaning in the Making: Meaning Potential Emerging from Acts of Meaning. Language Learning 59(Supplement 1): 211–35.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. 2013. Applying Systemic Functional Linguistics in Healthcare Contexts. Text & Talk 33: 437–66.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. 2018. The Notion of a Multilingual Meaning Potential: A Systemic Exploration. In Sellami-Baklouti, A. and Fontaine, L., eds., Perspectives from Systemic Functional Linguistics. London: Routledge. 90120.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., Teruya, K., and Wu, C.. 2008. Multilingual Studies as a Multi-dimensional Space of Interconnected Language Studies. In Webster, J. J., ed., Meaning in Context: Strategies for Implementing Intelligent Applications of Language Studies. London: Continuum. 146220.Google Scholar
MLA Ad Hoc Committee on Foreign Languages. 2007. Foreign Languages and Higher Education: New Structures for a Changed World. Profession 2007: 234–45.Google Scholar
Nikula, T., Dafouz, E., Moore, P., and Smit, U., eds. 2016. Conceptualising Integration in CLIL and Multilingual Education. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Norris, J. M. and Ortega, L.. 2000. Effectiveness of L2 Instruction: A Research Synthesis and Quantitative Meta-analysis. Language Learning 50: 417528.Google Scholar
Norris, J. M. and Ortega, L.. 2009. Towards an Organic Approach to Investigating CAF in Instructed SLA: The Case of Complexity. Applied Linguistics 30: 555–78.Google Scholar
O’Halloran, K. L., ed. 2011. Multimodal Studies: Exploring Issues and Domains. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ortega, L. 2015. Syntactic Complexity in L2 Writing: Progress and Expansion. Journal of Second Language Writing 29: 8294.Google Scholar
Ortega, L. and Byrnes, H.. 2008. Theorizing Advancedness: Setting up the Longitudinal Research Agenda. In Ortega, L. and Byrnes, H., eds., The Longitudinal Study of Advanced L2 Capacities. New York: Routledge. 281–99.Google Scholar
Painter, C., Martin, J. R., and Unsworth, L.. 2013. Reading Visual Narratives: Image Analysis of Children’s Picture Books. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar
Ravelli, L. 2003. Renewal of Connection: Integrating Theory and Practice in an Understanding of Grammatical Metaphor. In Simon-Vandenbergen, A., Taverniers, M., and Ravelli, L., eds., Grammatical Metaphor: Views from Systemic Functional Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 3764.Google Scholar
Ryshina-Pankova, M. and Byrnes, H.. 2013. Writing as Learning to Know: Tracing Knowledge Construction in L2 German Compositions. Journal of Second Language Writing 22: 179–97.Google Scholar
Schleppegrell, M. J. 2004a. The Language of Schooling: A Functional Linguistics Perspective. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Schleppegrell, M. J. 2004b. Technical Writing in a Second Language: The Role of Grammatical Metaphor. In Ravelli, L. J. and Ellis, R. A., eds., Analysing Academic Writing: Contextualized Frameworks. London: Continuum. 172–89.Google Scholar
Swales, J. M. 1990. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Teruya, K. 2006. Grammar as a Resource for the Construction of Language Logic for Advanced Language Learning in Japanese. In Byrnes, H., ed., Advanced Language Learning: The Contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky. London: Continuum. 109–33.Google Scholar
Whittaker, R., McCabe, A., and O’Donnell, M., eds. 2007. Advances in Language and Education. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×