Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T02:52:58.183Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - Soft Computing Methods and Water Management

from Part III - Sustainable Water Management under Future Uncertainty

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2022

By
Mohammad Zounemat-Kermani  and
Meysam Alizamir
Edited by
Qiuhong Tang  and
Guoyong Leng
Qiuhong Tang
Affiliation:
Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing
Guoyong Leng
Affiliation:
Oxford University Centre for the Environment
Get access

Summary

This chapter reviews recent developments in modern soft computing models, including heuristic algorithms, extreme learning machines and models based on deep learning strategies applied to water management. In this context, we describe the basics and fundamentals of the mentioned soft computing methods. We then provide a brief review of the models applied in three fields of water management: drought forecasting, evapotranspiration modelling and rainfall-runoff simulation. Thus, we provide guidelines for modern soft computing techniques applied to water management.

Keywords

HydrologyHydrometeorologyWater resourcesHydroinformaticsHydrosciencesMachine learningData miningDeep learning
Type
Chapter
Information
Climate Risk and Sustainable Water Management , pp. 342 - 373
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdullah, S. S., Malek, M. A., Abdullah, N. S., Kisi, O., & Yap, K. S. (2015). Extreme learning machines: A new approach for prediction of reference evapotranspiration. Journal of Hydrology 527: 184–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abdullah, S. S., Malek, M. A., Mustapha, A., & Aryanfar, A. (2014). Hybrid of artificial neural network-genetic algorithm for prediction of reference evapotranspiration (ET0) in arid and semiarid regions. Journal of Agricultural Science 6(3): 191.Google Scholar
Afzaal, H., Farooque, A. A., Abbas, F., & Acharya, B. (2020). Groundwater estimation from major physical hydrology components using artificial neural networks and deep learning. Water 12(1): 5.Google Scholar
Agana, N., & Homaifar, A. (2018). EMD-based predictive deep belief network for time series prediction: An application to drought forecasting. Hydrology 5(1): 18.Google Scholar
Ahmad, A., Razali, S. F. M., Mohamed, Z. S., & El-shafie, A. (2016). The application of artificial bee colony and gravitational search algorithm in reservoir optimization. Water Resources Management 30(7): 2497–2516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ali, M., Deo, R. C., Downs, N. J., & Maraseni, T. (2018). Multi-stage hybridized online sequential extreme learning machine integrated with Markov Chain Monte Carlo copula-Bat algorithm for rainfall forecasting. Atmospheric Research 213: 450–464.Google Scholar
Al-Sudani, Z. A., Salih, S. Q., & Yaseen, Z. M. (2019). Development of multivariate adaptive regression spline integrated with differential evolution model for streamflow simulation. Journal of Hydrology 573: 1–12.Google Scholar
Ashofteh, P. S., Bozorg-Haddad, O., & Loáiciga, H. A. (2020). Logical genetic programming (LGP) application to water resources management. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 192(1): 34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bengio, Y., Lamblin, P., Popovici, D., & Larochelle, H. (2007). Greedy layer-wise training of deep networks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 19. Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Vancouver, BC, 4–7 December 2006 (pp. 153–160).Google Scholar
Cao, J., Chi, D., Liu, L., Li, S., & Yu, M. (2009). Application of BP network model based on PSO for the forecast of drought and flood. Journal of Shenyang Agricultural University 40(1): 118–121.Google Scholar
Cao, J., Lin, Z., & Huang, G. B. (2012). Self-adaptive evolutionary extreme learning machine. Neural Processing Letters 36(3): 285–305.Google Scholar
Chen, J., Jin, Q., & Chao, J. (2012). Design of deep belief networks for short-term prediction of drought index using data in the Huaihe river basin. Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2012(6): 235929.Google Scholar
Civicioglu, P. (2012). Transforming geocentric cartesian coordinates to geodetic coordinates by using differential search algorithm. Computers & Geosciences 46: 229–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darabi, H., Choubin, B., Rahmati, O., Haghighi, A. T., Pradhan, B., & Kløve, B. (2019). Urban flood risk mapping using the GARP and QUEST models: A comparative study of machine learning techniques. Journal of Hydrology 569: 142–154.Google Scholar
Deo, R. C., & Şahin, M. (2015). Application of the extreme learning machine algorithm for the prediction of monthly Effective Drought Index in eastern Australia. Atmospheric Research 153: 512–525.Google Scholar
Deo, R. C., Tiwari, M. K., Adamowski, J. F., & Quilty, J. M. (2017). Forecasting effective drought index using a wavelet extreme learning machine (W-ELM) model. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment 31(5): 1211–1240.Google Scholar
Dongwen, C. (2013). Comprehensive evaluation of water resources development and utilization in Yangtze River Basin based on extreme learning machine. Advances in Science and Technology of Water Resources 2: 005.Google Scholar
Feng, Y., Peng, Y., Cui, N., Gong, D., & Zhang, K. (2017). Modelling reference evapotranspiration using extreme learning machine and generalized regression neural network only with temperature data. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 136: 71–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geem, Z. W., Kim, J. H., & Loganathan, G. V. (2001). A new heuristic optimization algorithm: Harmony search. Simulation 76(2): 60–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghimire, S., Deo, R. C., Downs, N. J., & Raj, N. (2018). Self-adaptive differential evolutionary extreme learning machines for long-term solar radiation prediction with remotely-sensed MODIS satellite and reanalysis atmospheric products in solar-rich cities. Remote Sensing of Environment 212: 176–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gocic, M., Petković, D., Shamshirband, S., & Kamsin, A. (2016). Comparative analysis of reference evapotranspiration equations modelling by extreme learning machine. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 127: 56–63.Google Scholar
He, X., Luo, J., Zuo, G., & Xie, J. (2019a). Daily runoff forecasting using a hybrid model based on variational mode decomposition and deep neural networks. Water Resources Management 33(4): 1571–1590.Google Scholar
He, Z., Zhou, J., Qin, H., Jia, B., & Lu, C. (2019b). Long-term joint scheduling of hydropower station group in the upper reaches of the Yangtze River using partition parameter adaptation differential evolution. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 81: 1–13.Google Scholar
Hinton, G. E., Osindero, S., & Teh, Y. W. (2006). A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets. Neural Computation 18(7): 1527–1554.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huang, G. B., Zhu, Q. Y., & Siew, C. K. (2004). Extreme learning machine: A new learning scheme of feedforward neural networks. Neural Networks 2: 985–990.Google Scholar
Huang, W. B., & Sun, F. C. (2015). A deep and stable extreme learning approach for classification and regression. Proceedings of ELM-2014, Vol. 1 (pp. 141–150). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
Karaboga, D. (2005). An Idea Based on Honey Bee Swarm for Numerical Optimization (Vol. 200, pp. 1–10). Technical report-tr06, Erciyes University, Engineering Faculty, Computer Engineering Department.Google Scholar
Kennedy, J., & Eberhart, R. (1995). Particle swarm optimization. Neural Networks, Proceedings, IEEE International Conference, vol. 4, 27 November–1 December, Perth, WA (pp. 1942–1948).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kisi, O., & Alizamir, M. (2018). Modelling reference evapotranspiration using a new wavelet conjunction heuristic method: Wavelet extreme learning machine vs wavelet neural networks. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 263: 41–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kisi, O., Gorgij, A. D., Zounemat-Kermani, M., Mahdavi-Meymand, A., & Kim, S. (2019). Drought forecasting using novel heuristic methods in a semi-arid environment. Journal of Hydrology 578: 124053.Google Scholar
Kisi, O., Sanikhani, H., Zounemat-Kermani, M., & Niazi, F. (2015). Long-term monthly evapotranspiration modeling by several data-driven methods without climatic data. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 115: 66–77.Google Scholar
Kisi, O., & Zounemat-Kermani, M. (2014). Comparison of two different adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems in modelling daily reference evapotranspiration. Water Resources Management 28(9): 2655–2675.Google Scholar
Li, B., & Cheng, C. (2014). Monthly discharge forecasting using wavelet neural networks with extreme learning machine. Science China Technological Sciences 57(12), 2441–2452.Google Scholar
Li, M. B., Huang, G. B., Saratchandran, P., & Sundararajan, N. (2005). Fully complex extreme learning machine. Neurocomputing 68: 306–314.Google Scholar
Li, S., Kazemi, H., & Rockaway, T. D. (2019). Performance assessment of stormwater GI practices using artificial neural networks. Science of the Total Environment 651: 2811–2819.Google Scholar
Li, X., Du, Z., & Song, G. (2018). A method of rainfall runoff forecasting based on deep convolution neural networks. 2018 Sixth International Conference on Advanced Cloud and Big Data (CBD), 12–15 August, Lanzhou, China (pp. 304–310). IEEE.Google Scholar
Liang, N. Y., Huang, G. B., Saratchandran, P., & Sundararajan, N. (2006). A fast and accurate online sequential learning algorithm for feedforward networks. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 17(6): 1411–1423.Google Scholar
Liu, F., Xu, F., & Yang, S. (2017). A flood forecasting model based on deep learning algorithm via integrating stacked autoencoders with BP neural network. 2017 IEEE Third International Conference on Multimedia Big Data (BigMM), 19–21 April, Laguna Hills, CA (pp. 58–61). IEEE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maier, H. R., & Dandy, G. C. (2000). Neural networks for the prediction and forecasting of water resources variables: A review of modelling issues and applications. Environmental Modelling & Software 15(1): 101–124.Google Scholar
Malik, A., Kumar, A., & Singh, R. P. (2019). Application of heuristic approaches for prediction of hydrological drought using multi-scalar streamflow drought index. Water Resources Management 33(8): 3985–4006.Google Scholar
Meng, X., Chang, J., Wang, X., & Wang, Y. (2019). Multi-objective hydropower station operation using an improved cuckoo search algorithm. Energy 168: 425–439.Google Scholar
Meshram, S. G., Ghorbani, M. A., Deo, R. C., Kashani, M. H., Meshram, C., & Karimi, V. (2019). New approach for sediment yield forecasting with a two-phase feedforward neuron network-particle swarm optimization model integrated with the gravitational search algorithm. Water Resources Management 33(7): 2335–2356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirjalili, S., Mirjalili, S. M., & Lewis, A. (2014). Grey wolf optimizer. Advances in Engineering Software 69: 46–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moeini, R., Soltani-Nezhad, M., & Daei, M. (2017). Constrained gravitational search algorithm for large scale reservoir operation optimization problem. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 62: 222–233.Google Scholar
Naidu, M. N., Boindala, P. S., Vasan, A., & Varma, M. R. (2020). Optimization of water distribution networks using cuckoo search algorithm. In Renkata Rao, R., & Taler, J. (eds.), Advanced Engineering Optimization Through Intelligent Techniques (pp. 67–74). Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
Niu, W. J., Feng, Z. K., Zeng, M., et al. (2019). Forecasting reservoir monthly runoff via ensemble empirical mode decomposition and extreme learning machine optimized by an improved gravitational search algorithm. Applied Soft Computing 82: 105589.Google Scholar
Nourani, V., Baghanam, A. H., Adamowski, J., & Kisi, O. (2014). Applications of hybrid wavelet–artificial intelligence models in hydrology: A review. Journal of Hydrology 514: 358–377.Google Scholar
Ojugo, A. A., Emudianughe, J., Yoro, R. E., Okonta, E. O., & Eboka, A. O. (2013). A hybrid artificial neural network gravitational search algorithm for rainfall runoffs modeling and simulation in hydrology. Progress in Intelligent Computing and Applications 2: 22–33.Google Scholar
Petković, D., Gocic, M., Shamshirband, S., Qasem, S. N., & Trajkovic, S. (2016). Particle swarm optimization-based radial basis function network for estimation of reference evapotranspiration. Theoretical and Applied Climatology 125(3–4): 555–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahgoshay, M., Feiznia, S., Arian, M., & Hashemi, S. A. A. (2019). Simulation of daily suspended sediment load using an improved model of support vector machine and genetic algorithms and particle swarm. Arabian Journal of Geosciences 12(9): 277.Google Scholar
Rashedi, E., Nezamabadi-Pour, H., & Saryazdi, S. (2009). GSA: A gravitational search algorithm. Information Sciences 179(13): 2232–2248.Google Scholar
Reddy, M. J., & Singh, V. P. (2014). Multivariate modelling of droughts using copulas and metaheuristic methods. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment 28(3): 475–489.Google Scholar
Robles-Velasco, A., Cortés, P., Muñuzuri, J., & Onieva, L. (2020). Prediction of pipe failures in water supply networks using logistic regression and support vector classification. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 196: 106754.Google Scholar
Roushangar, K., Alizadeh, F., & Nourani, V. (2017). Improving capability of conceptual modelling of watershed rainfall–runoff using hybrid wavelet-extreme learning machine approach. Journal of Hydroinformatics 20(1): 69–87.Google Scholar
Saggi, M. K., & Jain, S. (2019). Reference evapotranspiration estimation and modeling of the Punjab Northern India using deep learning. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 156: 387–398.Google Scholar
Sattar, A. M., Ertuğrul, Ö. F., Gharabaghi, B., McBean, E. A., & Cao, J. (2019). Extreme learning machine model for water network management. Neural Computing and Applications 31(1): 157–169.Google Scholar
Shabanlou, S. (2018). Improvement of extreme learning machine using self-adaptive evolutionary algorithm for estimating discharge capacity of sharp-crested weirs located on the end of circular channels. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation 59: 63–71.Google Scholar
Storn, R., & Price, K. (1997). Differential evolution – A simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces. Journal of Global Optimization 11(4): 341–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taormina, R., & Chau, K. W. (2015). Data-driven input variable selection for rainfall–runoff modelling using binary-coded particle swarm optimization and extreme learning machines. Journal of Hydrology 529: 1617–1632.Google Scholar
Tikhamarine, Y., Souag-Gamane, D., & Kisi, O. (2019). A new intelligent method for monthly streamflow prediction: Hybrid wavelet support vector regression based on grey wolf optimizer (WSVR–GWO). Arabian Journal of Geosciences 12(17): 540.Google Scholar
Wang, L., Kisi, O., Zounemat-Kermani, M., & Li, H. (2017). Pan evaporation modeling using six different heuristic computing methods in different climates of China. Journal of Hydrology 544: 407–427.Google Scholar
Wang, W. C., Xu, D. M., Chau, K. W., & Chen, S. (2013). Improved annual rainfall–runoff forecasting using PSO–SVM model based on EEMD. Journal of Hydroinformatics 15(4): 1377–1390.Google Scholar
Wen, X., Feng, Q., Deo, R. C., et al. (2019). Two-phase extreme learning machines integrated with the complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition with adaptive noise algorithm for multi-scale runoff prediction problems. Journal of Hydrology 570: 167–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yadav, B., Ch, S., Mathur, S., & Adamowski, J. (2016). Discharge forecasting using an online sequential extreme learning machine (OS-ELM) model: A case study in Neckar River, Germany. Measurement 92: 433–445.Google Scholar
Yang, X. S., & Deb, S. (2009). Cuckoo search via Lévy flights. 2009 World Congress on Nature & Biologically Inspired Computing (NaBIC), 9–11 December, Coimbatore, India (pp. 210–214). IEEE.Google Scholar
Yang, Y., Wang, Y., & Yuan, X. (2012). Bidirectional extreme learning machine for regression problem and its learning effectiveness. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems 23(9): 1498–1505.Google Scholar
Yaseen, Z. M., Jaafar, O., Deo, R. C., et al. (2016). Stream-flow forecasting using extreme learning machines: A case study in a semi-arid region in Iraq. Journal of Hydrology 542: 603–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yilmaz, B., Aras, E., Kankal, M., & Nacar, S. (2019). Prediction of suspended sediment loading by means of hybrid artificial intelligence approaches. Acta Geophysica 67(6): 1693–1705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yin, Z., Wen, X., Feng, Q., He, Z., Zou, S., & Yang, L. (2016). Integrating genetic algorithm and support vector machine for modelling daily reference evapotranspiration in a semi-arid mountain area. Hydrology Research 48(5): 1177–1191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yue, Q., Zhang, F., Zhang, C., Zhu, H., Tang, Y., & Guo, P. (2020). A full fuzzy-interval credibility-constrained nonlinear programming approach for irrigation water allocation under uncertainty. Agricultural Water Management 230: 105961.Google Scholar
Zong, W., Huang, G. B., & Chen, Y. (2013). Weighted extreme learning machine for imbalance learning. Neurocomputing 101: 229–242.Google Scholar
Zou, Q., Liao, L., Ding, Y., & Qin, H. (2019). Flood classification based on a fuzzy clustering iteration model with combined weight and an immune grey wolf optimizer algorithm. Water 11(1): 80.Google Scholar
Zounemat-Kermani, M., Kisi, O., & Rajaee, T. (2013). Performance of radial basis and LM-feed forward artificial neural networks for predicting daily watershed runoff. Applied Soft Computing 13(12): 4633–4644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zounemat-Kermani, M., Kisi, O., Piri, J., & Mahdavi-Meymand, A. (2019). Assessment of artificial intelligence-based models and metaheuristic algorithms in modelling evaporation. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 24(10): 04019033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×