Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:30:28.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 6 - The Bacchants Are Silent

Using Cognitive Science to Explore the Experience of the Oreibasia

from Part III - Gender

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2022

By
Vivienne McGlashan
Edited by
Esther Eidinow ,
Armin W. Geertz  and
John North
Esther Eidinow
Affiliation:
University of Bristol
Armin W. Geertz
Affiliation:
Aarhus Universitet, Denmark
John North
Affiliation:
University College London
Get access

Summary

Tantalizing similarities between Euripides’ Bacchae and the historical ritual of the oreibasia— – a mountainside dance performed for Dionysus – have fascinated and polarized scholars for over a century. The wild women of myth are depicted as ecstatic devotees of the Dionysian cult, or as raging, murderous avatars of the god’s vengeance. But in the tightly regulated civic cult, ritual practitioners were respectable women who honoured Dionysus by imitating his mythological entourage.<break/>The question of whether ritual participants could have experienced ecstasy and epiphanic visions has stimulated a long-running debate encompassing hysteria, belief, and the interplay between cult and myth. Lacking first-hand accounts, historians have struggled with reconciling the ecstatic ‘madwomen’ of myth with the prestige of the civic cult performance, but the apparent gap between ritual performers and mythical exemplars may not be so wide. Inspired by Jan Bremmer’s 1984 paper on the physiological effects of the oreibasia, I revisit the ancient evidence with a cognitive interpretative framework, looking at ritual experience in the embodied mind. Incorporating theories of agency detection and predictive processing, I explore how an interdisciplinary approach can integrate artistic and historical narratives, and better understand the lived experience and religious identity of historical maenads.

Keywords

DionysusmaenadmaniaBacchaeepiphany
Type
Chapter
Information
Cognitive Approaches to Ancient Religious Experience , pp. 145 - 166
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andersen, M. 2019. ‘Predictive Coding in Agency Detection’, Religion, Brain & Behavior 9(1): 1–20.Google Scholar
Andersen, M., Pfeiffer, T., Müller, S., and Schjoedt, U.. 2019. ‘Agency Detection in Predictive Minds: A Virtual Reality Study’, Religion, Brain & Behavior 9(1): 52–64.Google Scholar
Atran, S. and Norenzayan, A.. 2004. ‘Religion’s Evolutionary Landscape: Counterintuition, Commitment, Compassion, Communion’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27(6): 713–730.Google Scholar
Barrett, J. L. 2000. ‘Exploring the Natural Foundations of Religion’, Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4(1): 29–34.Google Scholar
Barrett, J. L., and Lanman, J. A.. 2008. ‘The Science of Religious Beliefs’, Religion 38(2): 109–124.Google Scholar
Bowden, H. 2010. Mystery Cults in the Ancient World. London.Google Scholar
Bowersock, G. W. 1965. ‘Some Persons in Plutarch’s Moralia’, Classical Quarterly 15(2): 267–270.Google Scholar
Boyer, P. 1994. The Naturalness of Religious Ideas: A Cognitive Theory of Religion. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA and London.Google Scholar
Boyer, P. 2001. Religion Explained: The Evolutionary Origins of Religious Thought. New York, NY.Google Scholar
Bremmer, J. N. 1984. ‘Greek Maenadism Reconsidered’, Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 55: 267–286.Google Scholar
Bremmer, J. N. 2019. ‘Greek Maenadism’, in Bremmer, J. N., ed. The World of Greek Religion and Mythology: Collected Essays II, 251–278. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Brown, C. 1982. ‘Dionysus and the Women of Elis: PMG 871’, Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 23(4): 305–314.Google Scholar
Bundrick, S. D. 2015. ‘Athenian Eye Cups in Context’, American Journal of Archaeology 119(3): 295–341.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. A. 1988. Greek Lyric, Volume II: Anacreon, Anacreontea, Choral Lyric from Olympus to Alcman. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Carpenter, T. H. 1997. Dionysian Imagery in Fifth-Century Athens. Oxford.Google Scholar
Clark, A. 2013. ‘Whatever Next? Predictive Brains, Situated Agents, and the Future of Cognitive Science’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36(3): 181–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Connelly, J. B. 2007. Portrait of a Priestess: Women and Ritual in Ancient Greece. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Dodds, E. R. 1940. ‘Maenadism in the Bacchae’, The Harvard Theological Review 33(3): 155–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodds, E. R. 1951. Greeks and the Irrational. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA and London.Google Scholar
Dodds, E. R. 1960. Euripides’ Bacchae. Oxford.Google Scholar
Edwards, M. W. 1960. ‘Representations of Maenads on Archaic Red-Figure Vases’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 80: 78–87.Google Scholar
Eidinow, E. 2013 [2007]. Oracles, Curses, and Risk among the Ancient Greeks. Oxford.Google Scholar
Eidinow, E. 2019. ‘The (Ancient Greek) Subject Supposed to Believe’, Numen 66(1): 56–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrari, G. 1986. ‘EYE-CUP’, Revue Archéologique 1: 5–20.Google Scholar
Frontisi-Ducroux, F. 1989. ‘In the Mirror of the Mask’, in Berard, C., ed. A City of Images, 151–167.Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Geertz, A. W. 2010. ‘Too Much Mind and Not Enough Brain, Body and Culture. On What Needs to be Done in the Cognitive Science of Religion’, Historia Religionum 2: 21–38.Google Scholar
Goff, B. 2004. Citizen Bacchae: Women’s Ritual Practice in Ancient Greece. Oakland, CA.Google Scholar
Gore, C. J., Hahn, A. G., Scroop, G. C., Watson, D. B., Norton, K. I., Wood, R. J., Campbell, D. P., and Emonson, D. L.. 1996. ‘Increased Arterial Desaturation in Trained Cyclists during Maximal Exercise at 580 m Altitude’, Journal of Applied Physiology 80(6): 2204–2210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gore, C. J., McSharry, P. E., Hewitt, A. J., and Saunders, P. U.. 2008. ‘Preparation for Football Competition at Moderate to High Altitude’, Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports 18(s1): 85–95.Google Scholar
Guthrie, S. 1993. Faces in the Clouds: A New Theory of Religion. New York, NY and Oxford.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. 2009. The Aesthetics of Mimesis: Ancient Texts and Modern Problems. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Harrison, J. E. 1903. Prolegomena to the Study of Greek Religion. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Harrison, T. 2015. ‘Beyond the Polis? New Approaches to Greek Religion’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 135: 165–180.Google Scholar
Harrison, T. 2016. ‘Belief vs. Practice’, in Eidinow, E. and Kindt, J., eds. The Oxford Handbook of Ancient Greek Religion, 21–28. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hedreen, G. 1994. ‘Silens, Nymphs, and Maenads’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 114: 47–69.Google Scholar
Heinemann, A. 2016. Der Gott des Gelages: Dionysos, Satyrn und Mänaden auf attischem Trinkgeschirr des 5. Jahrhunderts v. Chr. Berlin and Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Henrichs, A. 1969. ‘Die Maenaden von Milet’, Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 4: 223–241.Google Scholar
Henrichs, A. 1978. ‘Greek Maenadism from Olympias to Messalina’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 82: 121–160.Google Scholar
Henrichs, A. 1982. ‘Changing Dionysiac Identities’, in Meyer, B. F. and Sanders, E. P., eds. Jewish and Christian Self-Definition, vol. 3, 137–160. London.Google Scholar
Henrichs, A. 1984. ‘Loss of Self, Suffering, Violence: The Modern View of Dionysus from Nietzsche to Girard’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 88: 205–240.Google Scholar
Henrichs, A. 1987. ‘Myth Visualized: Dionysos and His Circle in Sixth-Century Attic Vase-Painting’, in Papers on the Amasis Painter and His World, 94–124. Malibu, CA.Google Scholar
Herman, G. 2011. ‘Greek Epiphanies and the Sensed Presence’, História: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte 60(2): 127–157.Google Scholar
Herrmann, P. 1998. Inschriften von Milet, Teil 2: Inschriften n.407-1019. Berlin and New York, NY.Google Scholar
Higgins, J. P., Tuttle, T., and Higgins, J. A.. 2010. ‘Altitude and the Heart: Is Going High Safe for Your Cardiac Patient?’, American Heart Journal 159(1): 25–32.Google Scholar
Hohwy, J. 2013. The Predictive Mind. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hughes, J. D. 1994. Environmental Problems of the Greeks and Romans: Ecology in the Ancient Mediterranean. Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
Isler-Kerényi, C. 2001. ‘Review: Susanne Moraw, Die Mänade in der attischen Vasenmalerei des 6. und 5. Jahrhunderts v. Chr.’, Gnomon 73(4): 336–342.Google Scholar
Kapetanopoulos, E. 1966. ‘Klea and Leontis: Two Ladies from Delphi’, Bulletin de Correspondance Hellénique 90: 119–130.Google Scholar
Kefalidou, E. 2009. ‘The Iconography of Madness in Attic Vase-Painting’, in Oakley, J. H. and Palagia, O., eds. Athenian Potters and Painters Volume II, 90–99. Oxford.Google Scholar
Kern, O. 1900. Die Inschriften von Magnesia am Maenader. Berlin.Google Scholar
Keuls, E. C. 1985. The Reign of the Phallus: Sexual Politics in Ancient Athens. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
Kindt, J. 2012. Rethinking Greek Religion. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korshak, Y. 1987. Frontal Faces in Attic Vase Painting of the Archaic Period. Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Lawler, L. B. 1927. ‘The Maenads: A Contribution to the Study of the Dance in Ancient Greece’, Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome 6: 69–112.Google Scholar
Lewis, I. M. 1971. Ecstatic Religion: A Study of Shamanism and Spirit Possession. New York, NY.Google Scholar
Lopez, C. and Blanke, O.. 2011. ‘The Thalamocortical Vestibular System in Animals and Humans’, Brain Research Reviews 67(1): 119–146.Google Scholar
Lowe, N. J. 2019. ‘The Rational Irrationalist: Dodds and the Paranormal’, in Rediscovering E. R. Dodds: Scholarship, Education, Poetry, and the Paranormal. Oxford.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, M. 2014a. ‘Fauna of the Ancient Mediterranean World’, in Campbell, G. L., ed. The Oxford Handbook of Animals in Classical Thought and Life, 156–179. Oxford.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, M. 2014b. ‘Hunting’, in Campbell, G. L., ed. The Oxford Handbook of Animals in Classical Thought and Life, 203–215. Oxford.Google Scholar
Maij, D. L. R., van Schie, H. T., and van Elk, M.. 2019. ‘The Boundary Conditions of the Hypersensitive Agency Detection Device: An Empirical Investigation of Agency Detection in Threatening Situations’, Religion, Brain & Behavior 9(1): 23–51.Google Scholar
Martin, L. H. 2006. ‘Cognitive Science, Ritual, and the Hellenistic Mystery Religions’, Religion and Theology 13(3–4): 383–395.Google Scholar
Mast, F. W. and Ellis, A. W.. 2017. ‘Internal Models, Vestibular Cognition, and Mental Imagery: Conceptual Considerations’, in Ferrè, E. R. and Harris, L. R., eds. Vestibular Cognition, 89–106. Leiden and Boston, MA.Google Scholar
McNally, S. 1978. ‘The Maenad in Early Greek Art’, Arethusa 11: 101–135.Google Scholar
Merkelbach, R. 1972. ‘Milesische Bakchen’, Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 9: 77–83.Google Scholar
Mills, S. 2016. Auditory Archaeology: Understanding Sound and Hearing in the Past. New York, NY.Google Scholar
Moraw, S. 1998. Die Mänade in der attischen Vasenmalerei des 6. und 5. Jahrhunderts v. Chr. Mainz.Google Scholar
Osborne, R. 2010. ‘The Ecstasy and the Tragedy: Varieties of Religious Experience in Art, Drama and Society’, in Osborne, R., ed. Athens and Athenian Democracy, 368–404. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Osborne, R. 2018. The Transformation of Athens: Painted Pottery and the Creation of Classical Greece. Oxford and Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Parker, R. 2011. On Greek Religion. Ithaca, NY and London.Google Scholar
Peirce, S. 1998. ‘Visual Language and Concepts of Cult on the “Lenaia Vases”’, Classical Antiquity 17(1): 59–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petridou, G. 2016. Divine Epiphany in Greek Literature and Culture. Oxford.Google Scholar
Petrovic, A. and Petrovic, I.. 2016. Inner Purity and Pollution in Greek Religion: Volume I: Early Greek Religion. Oxford.Google Scholar
Platt, V. J. 2011. Facing the Gods: Epiphany and Representation in Graeco-Roman Art, Literature and Religion. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Platt, V. J. 2016. ‘Epiphany’, in Eidinow, E. and Kindt, J., eds. The Oxford Handbook of Ancient Greek Religion, 493–504. Oxford.Google Scholar
Rapp, A. 1872. ‘Die Mänade im griechischen Cultus, in der Kunst und Poesie’, Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 27: 1–22, 563–611.Google Scholar
Riekki, T., Lindeman, M., Aleneff, M., Halme, A., and Nuortimo, A.. 2013. ‘Paranormal and Religious Believers are More Prone to Illusory Face Perception than Skeptics and Non-believers’, Applied Cognitive Psychology 27(2): 150–155.Google Scholar
Rohde, E. 1894. Psyche: Seelencult und Unsterblichkeitsglaube der Griechen, vol. 2. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Rohde, E. 1925. Psyche: The Cult of Souls and Belief in Immortality among the Greeks. London and New York, NY.Google Scholar
Rouget, G. 1985. Music and Trance: A Theory of the Relations Between Music and Possession. Chicago, IL and London.Google Scholar
Santamaría, M. A. 2013. ‘The Term βάκχος and Dionysos Βάκχιος’, in Bernabé, A., de Jáuregui, M. Herrero, Jiménez San Cristóbal, A. I., and Martín Hernández, R., eds. Redefining Dionysos, 38–57. Berlin and Boston, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlesier, R. 1993. ‘Mixtures of Masks: Maenads as Tragic Models’, in Carpenter, T. H. and Faraone, C. A., eds. Masks of Dionysus, 89–114. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Scullion, S. 1999. ‘Tradition and Invention in Euripidean Aitiology’, Illinois Classical Studies 24/25: 217–233.Google Scholar
Scullion, S. 2002. ‘“Nothing to Do with Dionysus”: Tragedy Misconceived As Ritual’, Classical Quarterly 52(1): 102–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seaford, R. 1981. ‘Dionysiac Drama and the Dionysian Mysteries’, Classical Quarterly 31(2): 24.Google Scholar
Seaford, R. 1987. ‘Pentheus’ Vision: Bacchae 918-22’, Classical Quarterly 37(1): 3.Google Scholar
Seaford, R. 1996. The Plays of Euripides: Bacchae. Oxford.Google Scholar
Seemungal, B. M. 2017. ‘The Components of Vestibular Cognition – Motion versus Spatial Perception’, in Ferrè, E. R. and Harris, L. R., eds. Vestibular Cognition, 25–42. Leiden and Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Shukitt-Hale, B., and Lieberman, H. R.. 1996. ‘The Effect of Altitude on Cognitive Performance and Mood States’, in Marriott, B. M. and Carlson, S. J., eds. Nutritional Needs and Cold and High-Altitude Environments: Applications for Military Personnel in Field Operations, 435–451. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Sokolowski, F. 1955. Lois sacrées de l’Asie Mineure. Paris.Google Scholar
Sommerstein, A. H. 2008. Aeschylus III: Fragments. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Sourvinou-Inwood, C. 1990. ‘What Is Polis Religion?’, in Murray, O. and Price, S.R.F., eds. The Greek City: From Homer to Alexander, 295–322. Oxford.Google Scholar
Tian, X. and Poeppel, D.. 2010. ‘Mental Imagery of Speech and Movement Implicates the Dynamics of Internal Forward Models’, Frontiers in Psychology 1: Article 166.Google Scholar
Ustinova, Y. 2018. Divine Mania: Alteration of Consciousness in Ancient Greece. London.Google Scholar
van Elk, M. 2013. ‘Paranormal Believers Are More Prone to Illusory Agency Detection than Skeptics’, Consciousness and Cognition 22(3): 1041–1046.Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, N. and van Elk, M.. 2018. ‘Seeking the Supernatural: The Interactive Religious Experience Model’, Religion, Brain & Behavior: 1–31.Google Scholar
Vernant, J. P. and Frontisi-Ducroux, F.. 1988. ‘Features of the Mask in Ancient Greece’, in Vernant, J. P. and Vidal-Naquet, P., eds. Myth and Tragedy in Ancient Greece, 189–206. Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar
Versnel, H. 2011. Coping with the Gods: Wayward Readings in Greek Theology. Leiden.Google Scholar
Weaver, B. 2009. ‘Euripides’ “Bacchae” and Classical Typologies of Pentheus’ “Sparagmos” 510-406 BC’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 52: 15–43.Google Scholar
Weniger, L. 1883. Das Kollegium der sechzehn Frauen und der Dionysosdienst in Elis. Weimar.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×