Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T06:23:20.155Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - Norway

Corporate governance on the outskirts of the EU

from B - Europe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2013

Andreas M. Fleckner
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht, Germany
Klaus J. Hopt
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht, Germany
Get access

Summary

Introduction

This chapter gives an overview of the regulation of corporate governance in Norway, indicating also, to a certain extent, the practice related to and the effect of the regulation. The section following this introduction includes an overview of relevant acts and other sources of law. The main emphasis is on the third section, which focuses on the internal balance between the company organs, notably the composition of the different organs, the independence of directors, and shareholders' rights and obligations. The fourth section focuses on external corporate governance, mainly the regulation of takeovers, whereas sections five and six give a brief overview on enforcement and recent development regarding reporting on corporate social responsibility.

General information on corporate governance

Definition of corporate governance

There is no definition of corporate governance in Norway as a matter of law. The dominant corporate governance code (The Norwegian Code of Practice for Corporate Governance [“The Corporate Governance Code”]) does not expressly define the term either, but an indication is given of the understanding of the concept through the issues with which the code deals. The focus is on the relationship between the shareholders and the board. This is confirmed through the objective of the Corporate Governance Code, which is given as promoting companies' practice of corporate governance that regulates the division of roles between shareholders, the board of directors, and executive management more comprehensively than is required by legislation.

Type
Chapter
Information
Comparative Corporate Governance
A Functional and International Analysis
, pp. 702 - 752
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aarbakke, M., Aarbakke, A., Knutsen, G., Ofstad, T. and Skaare, J. (eds.), Aksjeloven og Allmennaksjeloven: Kommentarutgave (Commentary to the Norwegian Private Limited Liability Companies Act and the Public Limited Liability Companies Act), (in Norwegian), 2nd edn. (Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, 2004).
Kjelland, C., Teigen, A., and Sjåfjell, B., “Report from Norway: Corporate Governance and Simplification,”European Company Law 8 (2011), 32–36 available at Google Scholar
Lau Hansen, J., Nordic Company Law: The Regulation of Public Companies in Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden (Copenhagen: DJØF Publishing, 2003) on the Nordic corporate governance system, similar but yet different from the UK and the German systemsGoogle Scholar
Bøhren, Ø., Eierne, Styret og Ledelsen: Corporate Governance i Norge (The Owners, the Board and the Management: Corporate Governance in Norway) (in Norwegian) (Bergen: Fagbokforlaget, 2011)Google Scholar
Bream, R., “Norsk Hydro Chairman Forced to Quit,” Financial Times (August 5, 2007), available at : “The chairman of Norsk Hydro was forced to resign on Sunday over the closure of the group's stock option scheme, which involved a NKr210m ($36.5m) payout to top executives.”
Reiersen, H. and Sjåfjell, B., “Report from Norway: Gender Equality in the Board Room,”European Company Law 5 (2008) 191–195, available at .Google Scholar
Sjåfjell, B., Towards a Sustainable European Company Law: A Normative Analysis of the Objectives of EU Law, with the Takeover Directive as a Test Case (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2009), pp. 52–53Google Scholar
Smith, L., Kampen på aksjemarkedet: en rettslig studie av selskapsovertak og forsvarstiltak (The Stock Exchange as Battlefield: A Legal Study of Takeovers and Defense Mechanisms) (Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, 1988), pp. 45–61Google Scholar
Woxholth, G., Selskapsrett (Company Law) (Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk, 2004), p. 23Google Scholar
Andenæs, M. H., Aksjeselskaper og allmennaksjeselskaper (Private Limited Liability Companies and Public Limited Liability Companies) (Oslo: M. H. Andenæs, 2006), p. 358Google Scholar
Bråthen, T., Selskapsrett (Company Law), 2nd edn. (Oslo: Focus Forlag, 2006), p. 51.Google Scholar
Christensen, J., Kapitalselskaber: aktie- og anpartsselskabsret (Limited Liability Companies: Public and Private Companies) (Copenhagen: Thomson, 2003), p. 191Google Scholar
Hill, J., “Corporate Scandals Across the Globe: Regulating the Role of the Director,” in Ferrarini, G., Hopt, K., Winter, J., and Wymeersch, E. (eds.), Reforming Company and Takeover Law in Europe (Oxford University Press, 2004), pp. 241 et seqGoogle Scholar
Lau Hansen, J., “Catching Up with the Crowd – But Going Where? The New Codes on Corporate Governance in the Nordic Countries,”International Journal of Disclosure and Governance 3 (2006)Google Scholar
Truyen, F., Aksjonærenes myndighetsmisbruk (Shareholders' Abuse of Power) (in Norwegian) (Oslo: Cappelen akademisk forlag, 2005)Google Scholar
Atkins, R. and Jenkins, P., “DaimlerChrysler Drops Plan for Performance Pay,” Financial Times (March 24, 2004), available at , regarding a German court ruling “outlawing stock options for supervisory board members”
Delacroix, G., “France to Unveil New Rules on Share Options,” Financial Times (September 20, 2006), available at
Bream, R., “Norsk Hydro Chairman Forced to Quit,” Financial Times (August 5, 2007)
Reiersen, H., Ansvarsbegrensning og ansvarsfrihet i aksjeselskaper (Bergen: Fagbokforlaget, 2007)Google Scholar
Bernitz, U.“The Attack on the Nordic Multiple Voting Rights Model: The Legal Limits under EU Law,”European Business Law Review 15 (2004), 1423–1437Google Scholar
Skog, R.“The Takeover Directive, the ‘Breakthrough’ Rule and the Swedish System of Dual Class Common Stock,” 15 European Business Law Review 15 (2004), 1439–1451Google Scholar
Sjåfjell, B., “Report from Norway: The New Takeover Regime,”European Company Law 3(1) (2006), 35–39Google Scholar
Sjåfjell, B., “Country Report from Norway: The New Takeover Regime (2),”European Company Law 3(3) (2006), 202–206, both freely available at Google Scholar
Sjåfjell, B., “Why Law Matters: Corporate Social Irresponsibility and the Futility of Voluntary Climate Change Mitigation,”European Company Law 8 (2011), 56–64, available at Google Scholar
Sjåfjell, B., “Kun til plunder og heft? – Forbudet mot selskapsfinansiering av aksjeerverv i den norske allmennaksjeloven § 8–10” (Obstructive and Obsolete? The Prohibition against Financial Assistance for the Acquisition of Shares in the Public Limited Liability Companies Act Sect. 8–10), Nordisk Tidsskrift for Selskabsret (Nordic Journal of Company Law) 1(2) (2009), 116–145Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Norway
  • Edited by Andreas M. Fleckner, Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht, Germany, Klaus J. Hopt, Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht, Germany
  • Book: Comparative Corporate Governance
  • Online publication: 05 July 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139177375.021
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Norway
  • Edited by Andreas M. Fleckner, Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht, Germany, Klaus J. Hopt, Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht, Germany
  • Book: Comparative Corporate Governance
  • Online publication: 05 July 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139177375.021
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Norway
  • Edited by Andreas M. Fleckner, Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht, Germany, Klaus J. Hopt, Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht, Germany
  • Book: Comparative Corporate Governance
  • Online publication: 05 July 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139177375.021
Available formats
×