Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T10:48:15.734Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Relative Importance of Probabilities and Payoffs in Risk Taking

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Paul Slovic
Affiliation:
Founder and President of Decision Research and Professor of Psychology, University of Oregon
Sarah Lichtenstein
Affiliation:
Founder and President of Decision Research and Professor of Psychology, University of Oregon
Sarah Lichtenstein
Affiliation:
Decision Research. Oregon
Paul Slovic
Affiliation:
Decision Research, Oregon
Get access

Summary

This chapter is concerned with conceptualizing the process by which a person makes decisions about gambles whose probabilities and payoffs are explicitly stated.

Gambles commonly are characterized as multidimensional stimuli. For example, a two-outcome gamble in which one outcome is a gain of some amount of money and the other is a loss can be described by its location on four basic risk dimensions – probability of winning (PW), amount to win ($W), probability of losing (PL), and amount to lose ($L). The essence of an adequate descriptive theory of risk taking is a thorough understanding of the way in which people go about integrating information from these basic risk dimensions when evaluating gambles.

The influence of these basic risk dimensions is examined here with particular emphasis on two ideas. The first is “importance beliefs.” By this is meant that when a person evaluates a bet, he pays more attention to some risk dimensions than to others because he believes that these particular dimensions are most important for his present decision. For example, a person with very little money and great fear of losing it may focus his attention on the amount to lose ($L) and base his decisions almost exclusively on this dimension, largely disregarding the other information provided in the bet. Such beliefs about the relative importance of the risk dimensions may derive from previous experience, from logical analysis of the decision task, or even from quite irrational fears or prejudices.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×