The conclusion explores the feasibility of altering the shareholder primacy norm witihn the current political environment in the United States. Such a reform is more plausible than might at first be imagined. Corporate social responsibility rhetoric by large corporations, and corporate executives, has primed the American people to think of socially responsible corportate governance as an important social value, making a proposal to legally require that standard not so dramatic a proposal. Ordinary people, workers, and consumers, would likely welcome the change. Many large firms already have all the tools they need to undertake multi-stakeholder governance. They have diversity officers and social responsibility officers, they make reports and host stakeholder summits. They have developed a rich language for talking about corporate social responsibility. All that is missing is a corproate law that prescribes the authority, and obligation, for corporations to act in a socially responsible way, authentically, and lawfully, even when doing so is the more profitable course.