Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-14T06:33:56.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

39 - Israel

from A. - Actors’ Views

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2017

Claus Kreß
Affiliation:
Universität zu Köln
Stefan Barriga
Affiliation:
United Nations, New York
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Crime of Aggression
A Commentary
, pp. 1198 - 1216
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Becker, T., Terrorism and the State: Rethinking the Rules of State Responsibility (Oxford: Hart, 2006).Google Scholar
Cassese, A. and Gaeta, P. (eds.), Cassese’s International Criminal Law, 3rd edn (Oxford University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinstein, Y., War, Aggression and Self-Defence, 5th edn (Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Franck, T., Recourse to Force: State Action Against Threats and Armed Attacks (Cambridge University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, J. A., The International Court of Justice and Self-Defence in International Law (Oxford: Hart, 2009).Google Scholar
Lie, T., In the Cause of Peace: Seven Years with the United Nations (New York: Macmillan, 1954).Google Scholar
Shaw, M., International Law, 6th edn (Cambridge University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Stone, J., Conflict through Consensus: United Nations Approaches to Aggression (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1977).Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Enker, A., ‘Law of the Pursuer’, in Ben-Menahem, H., Edrei, A. and Hecht, N. S. (eds.), Windows onto Jewish Legal Culture: Fourteen Exploratory Essays, vol. I (2 vols., London: Routledge, 2011), 266320.Google Scholar
Jennings, R. Y., ‘International Force and the International Court of Justice’, in Cassese, A. (ed.), The Current Legal Regulation of the Use of Force (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1986), 323–35.Google Scholar
Rosenne, S., ‘International Courts and Tribunals, Jurisdiction and Admissibility of Inter-State Applications’ (last updated March 2006), in Wolfrum, Rudiger (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford University Press, 2008) (online edition).Google Scholar
Rubin, A. R., ‘The International Criminal Court: A Skeptical Analysis’, in Schmitt, M. N. (ed.), International Law across the Spectrum of Conflict: Essays in Honor of Professor L. C. Green on the Occasion of his Eightieth Birthday (Newport, RI: Naval War College, 2000), 421–38.Google Scholar
Wilmshurst, E., ‘Definition of the Crime of Aggression: State Responsibility or Individual Criminal Responsibility?’, in Politi, M. and Nesi, G. (eds.), The International Criminal Court and the Crime of Aggression (Farnham: Ashgate, 2004), 9396.Google Scholar
Wilmshurst, E., ‘Aggression’, in Cryer, R., Friman, H., Robinson, D. and Wilmshurst, E. (eds.), An Introduction to International Criminal Law and Procedure, 2nd edn (Cambridge University Press, 2010), 312–33.Google Scholar
Akande, D., ‘The Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court over Nationals of Non-Parties: Legal Basis and Limits’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 1(3) (2003), 618–50.Google Scholar
Akande, D., ‘The Contribution of the International Court of Justice and the Law of the Use of Force’, EJIL:Talk! (18 November 2011), available at: www.ejiltalk.org.Google Scholar
Bethlehem, D., ‘Self-Defense Against an Imminent or Actual Armed Attack by Nonstate Actors’, American Journal of International Law, 106 (2012), 770–77.Google Scholar
Beytenbrod, S., ‘Defining Aggression: An Opportunity to Curtail the Criminal Activities of Non-State Actors’, Brooklyn Journal of International Law, 36 (2011), 647–91.Google Scholar
Blum, Y., ‘Economic Boycotts in International Law’, Texas International Law Journal, 12 (1977), 516.Google Scholar
Creegan, E., ‘Justified Uses of Force and the Crime of Aggression’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 10(1) (2012), 5982.Google Scholar
Davidson, O., ‘A Legal Analysis of Computer Network Attacks Under International Law’, Israel Defense Forces Law Review, 3 (2007–8), 70111.Google Scholar
Gleditsch, N. P., Wallensteen, P., Eriksson, M., Sollenberg, M. and Strand, H., ‘Armed Conflict 1946–2001: A New Dataset’, Journal of Peace Research, 39(5) (2002), 615–37.Google Scholar
Lapidoth, R., ‘The Security Council in the May 1967 Crisis: A Study in Frustration’, Israel Law Review, 4 (1969), 534–50.Google Scholar
Meron, T., ‘Israel’s Acceptance of the Compulsory Jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice’, Israel Law Review, 4(3) (1969), 307–32.Google Scholar
Meron, T., ‘Ideal to Law to Practice: The Universal Declaration Today and Tomorrow’, Pace International Law Review, 11 (1999), 8994.Google Scholar
Meron, T., ‘Defining Aggression for the International Criminal Court’, Suffolk Transnational Law Review, 25(1) (2001–2), 115.Google Scholar
Meron, T., ‘Reflections on the Prosecution of War Crimes by International Tribunals’, American Journal of International Law, 100 (2006), 551–79.Google Scholar
Milanovic, M., ‘Aggression and Legality’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 10 (2012), 165–87.Google Scholar
Rosenne, S., ‘On the Definition of Aggression’, International Problems, 15 (1976), 2534.Google Scholar
Rosenne, S., ‘On Defining International Aggression: An Exercise in Futility’, Israel Law Review, 12 (1977), 401–5.Google Scholar
Rosenne, S., ‘State Responsibility and International Crimes: Further Reflections on Article 19 of the Draft Articles on State Responsibility’, New York University Journal of International Law & Politics, 30 (1997–98), 145–66.Google Scholar
Schondorf, R., ‘Extra-State Armed Conflict: Is there a Need for a New Legal Regime?’, New York University Journal of International Law & Politics, 37 (2004), 178.Google Scholar
Sofaer, A. D., ‘The Best Defense? Preventive Force and International Security’, Foreign Affairs, 89 (2010), 109–18.Google Scholar
Weisbord, N., ‘Conceptualizing Aggression’, Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law, 20 (2009), 168.Google Scholar
Case Concerning Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda), ICJ Reports (2005), 168.Google Scholar
Case Concerning Diplomatic and Consular Staff in Tehran (United States of America v. Iran), ICJ Reports (1980), 3.Google Scholar
Corfu Channel case (United Kingdom v. Albania), ICJ Reports (1949), 18.Google Scholar
East Timor case (Portugal v. Australia), ICJ Reports (1995), 90.Google Scholar
High Court of Justice 3451/02, Almandi and Others v. Minister of Defence and Others, available at: www.court.gov.il.Google Scholar
High Court of Justice 6204/06, Beilin v. Prime Minister, available at: www.court.gov.il.Google Scholar
Interpretation of Peace Treaties (Advisory Opinion), 30 March 1950, ICJ Reports (1950), 65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsen v. Hawaiian Kingdom, Award, PCA, International Law Reports, 119 (2001), 566–98.Google Scholar
Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (Advisory Opinion), ICJ Reports (2004), 136.Google Scholar
Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America), ICJ Reports (1986), 14.Google Scholar
Monetary Gold case (Italy v. France, United Kingdom, and United States), ICJ Reports (1954), 19.Google Scholar
Nuclear Tests (Australia v. France), ICJ Reports (1974), 253.Google Scholar
Nuclear Tests (New Zealand v. France), ICJ Reports (1974), 457.Google Scholar
Status of Eastern Carelia (Advisory Opinion), PCIJ (1923), Series B, No. 5.Google Scholar
Western Sahara (Advisory Opinion), ICJ Reports (1975), 12.Google Scholar
Abuja Non-Aggression and Common Defence Pact (2005), adopted by the African Union.Google Scholar
Akande, D., ‘Prosecuting Aggression: The Consent Problem and the Role of the Security Council’, Working Paper (May 2010).Google Scholar
Commission on Human Rights Resolution 1997/42, concerning Human Rights and Terrorism, 11 April 1997, E/CN.4/RES/1997/42.Google Scholar
Draft Code of Offences Against the Peace and Security of Mankind, Analytical Paper Prepared Pursuant to the Request Contained in Paragraph 256 of the Report of the Commission on the Work of its Thirty-Fourth Session, 25 March 1983, A/CN.4/365.Google Scholar
General Assembly, 22nd Session [Provisional Verbatim Records], 1566th Plenary Meeting, 25 September 1967, GAOR A/22/PV.1566.Google Scholar
Press Release, ‘Legal Prosecution of Aggression Required Agreed Definition, Preparatory Committee on the International Criminal Court Told’, 27 March 1996, UN Doc. L/2765.Google Scholar
Protocol on Non-Aggression and Mutual Defence in the Great Lakes Region (2006).Google Scholar
‘Report of the High-Level Panel on Threats, Challenges, and Change’, UN Doc. A/59/565 (2004).Google Scholar
‘Report of the Working Group on Amendments’, 9 December 2011, ICC-ASP/10/32.Google Scholar
‘Review Conference of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court’, Kampala, Uganda, 31 May–11 June 2010, Review Conference Official Records.Google Scholar
Security Council Resolution 405 (1977) concerning Benin, 14 April 1977, UN Doc. S/RES/405.Google Scholar
Security Council Resolution 419 (1977) concerning Benin, 24 November 1977, UN Doc. S/RES/419.Google Scholar
Security Council Resolution 1368 (2001) concerning Threats to International Peace and Security caused by Terrorist Acts, 12 September 2001, UN Doc. S/RES/1368.Google Scholar
Security Council Resolution 1373 (2001) concerning Threats to International Peace and Security caused by Terrorist Acts, 28 September 2001, UN Doc. S/RES/1373.Google Scholar
Statement on the US Withdrawal from the Proceedings Initiated by Nicaragua in the International Court of Justice, US Department of State Statement, 18 January 1985.Google Scholar
United Nations Treaty Series, vols. 108, 252 and 1349.Google Scholar
Vesterdahl, M., ‘Re-Defining the “Crime of Aggression”: The Evolution of an Outdated Ideal to Include Non-State Actors’ (February 2010), available at: http://works.bepress.com/matthew_vesterdahl/1.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×